IGF2BP3‑stabilized SIX4 promotes the proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation of ovarian cancer cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 25, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2022.12748
- Article Number: 232
-
Copyright: © Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Ovarian cancer (OC) is a common malignant tumor of the female reproductive system. The pathological classification of OC can be divided into four types: Epithelial tumor, germ cell tumor, sex cord stromal tumor and other types (1). Among them, epithelial OC accounts for 90% of OC, and serous OC is the most common subtype with the highest malignant degree among epithelial OC subtypes (2). Serous OC accounts for 70–80% of OC deaths, and overall survival (OS) rates have not changed significantly over the past few decades, remaining at ~30% (3). In the present study, OC refers to serous OC. OC is insidious, and often displays no obvious symptoms or signs before metastasis (4). Furthermore, ~70% of patients with OC are already at an advanced stage when diagnosed with OC, and consequently the mortality rate of OC is the highest among the various types of cancer of the female reproductive system (5). The recurrence and metastasis of OC present great obstacles to its effective treatment, and greatly contribute towards the high mortality rate of OC (6). Therefore, it is imperative to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying the invasion and metastasis in OC, and to develop specific targeted drugs for the treatment of OC.
SIX homeobox 4 (SIX4), a member of the homeobox family, subfamily SIX, was first found to regulate the expression of Na+/K+-ATPase subunit (7). Previous studies have demonstrated that the gene expression levels of SIX4 are closely associated with the occurrence, development, invasion, metastasis and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (8), breast cancer (9), bladder cancer (10), non-small cell lung cancer (11) and other tumor types, suggesting that the SIX4 gene may function as an oncogene in the development of a wide variety of tumors. In addition, a previous study has revealed that SIX4 is involved in the differentiation of epithelial follicular stem cells in the ovaries of Drosophila (12). Therefore, it was possible to hypothesize that the role of SIX4 in OC may also be that of an oncogene.
Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) has been reported to promote the invasion and metastasis of tumor cells through the local translation of IGF2BP3-bound transcripts (13). In addition, a previous study revealed that high expression levels of IGF2BP3 may serve as an oncogenic marker in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (14). Upregulation of the RNA-binding proteins lin-28 homolog B and IGF2BP3 is associated with chemoresistance and adverse disease outcomes in OC (15). Therefore, it may be hypothesized that IGF2BP3 exerts a role in SKOV3 cells by binding to the protein SIX4.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of SIX4 in OC, and the mechanism through which it is involved in the regulation of OC cell proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis, in order to provide a theoretical basis for targeted treatment of OC.
Materials and methods
Databases
The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) database (gepia.cancer-pku.cn) was used to detect the expression levels of SIX4 in OC tissues (16). In addition, the ENCORI (starbase.sysu.edu.cn) database was used to detect the association between the expression levels of SIX4 and the OS rate in patients with OC (17).
Cell culture
IOSE-80, A2780, OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cells were obtained from BeNa Culture Collection; Beijing Beina Chunglian Institute of Biotechnology while human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were acquired from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd. All cells were cultured in HyClone® DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% HyClone® FBS and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay
Total RNA was extracted from cells with TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, reverse transcription was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions of the HIFiscript cDNA Synthesis kit (CoWin Biosciences) and the system for RT-qPCR was established using SYBR Green Master Mix (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The thermocycling conditions for RT-qPCR were as follows: 95°C in a 20-µl reaction volume for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. The data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCq method (18). The primer sequences used were as follows: SIX4 forward, 5′-CGAGCTCTACAGCATCCTCG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CGGTACTTGTCTACGGCTCC-3′; IGF2BP3 forward, 5′-CAAGCAGAAACCATGTGATTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-AGAGGTGCCTTCAGGAGTAGAG-3′; and GAPDH forward, 5′-GAGCCCGCAGCCTCCCGCTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CCCGCGGCCATCACGCCACAG-3′.
Western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted from SKOV3 cells in RIPA lysis buffer (MilliporeSigma) and the protein concentration was detected using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Equal amounts of protein (30 µg per lane) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (MilliporeSigma). Subsequently, the membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder for 1.5 h at room temperature, and then incubated with primary antibodies, including anti-SIX4 (1:500 dilution; cat. no. LS-C101744), anti-IGF2BP3 (1:1,000 dilution; cat. no. 57145S), anti-E-cadherin (1:1,000 dilution; cat. no. 14472S), anti-N-cadherin (1:1,000 dilution; cat. no. 13116S), anti-Snail (1:1,000 dilution; cat. no. 3879S), anti-VEGF (1:1,000 dilution; cat. no. 65373S) and anti-GAPDH (1:1,000 dilution; cat.no. 5174S) at 4°C overnight (anti-SIX4 antibody was purchased from LifeSpan BioSciences, Inc.; all the other primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). The next day, after washing with PBS with 0.1% Tween-20, the membranes were incubated with a secondary antibody conjugated to HRP (1:1,000 dilution; cat. no. BS13278; Bioworld Technology, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. The expression levels of the different proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Proteins bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The data were analyzed using ImageJ 1.52 k software (version 1.46; National Institutes of Health).
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (density, 5×104 cells/ml) and a CCK-8 kit (cat. no. G021-1-1; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was used to detect the cell viability. Following incubation, 10 µl CCK-8 solution was added to the cells in each well at 37°C for 3 h. Cell viability was measured at 450 nm absorbance (optical density) with a microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
Cell transfection
Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs/sh) were cloned into the lentiviral vector pLKO.01 from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd using the restriction enzyme pair AgeI/EcoRI using the 3rd generation system. The molar ratio used for the lentivirus, packaging and envelope plasmids was 1:1:1. A total of 2 µg pLKO-sh-SIX4 (#1 and 2) and pLKO-sh-IGF2BP3 (#1 and 2), or pLKO-scramble (sh-NC), pCMV-DR8.9 and pCMV–VSVG plasmids, were transfected into 293T cells (ATCC) to produce lentiviruses. Cell culture media containing lentiviral particles were collected 48 h after transfection and the lentiviruses were harvested and used to infect SKOV3 cells at a multiplicity of infection of 40 with Invitrogen® Lipofectamine™ 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 48 h. At 48 h post-infection, puromycin (2 µg/ml) was used to select stably infected cells for 3–5 days. RT-qPCR and western blot analyses were employed to determine the cell transfection efficiency. The sequences of primers were as follows: sh-SIX4#1, 5′-CCTCCTCATTAGTTAATGTAT-3′; sh-SIX4#2, 5′-CCTCAGCCTTTCCAGTCATAT-3′; sh-IGF2BP3#1, 5′-GCCTCATTCTTATTTCAAGAT-3′; sh-IGF2BP3#2, 5′-CGGTGAATGAACTTCAGAATT-3′; and sh-NC, 5′-CAACAAGATGAAGAGCACCAA-3′.
For the transient IGF2BP3 overexpression experiments, the cells were transfected either with 2 µg pCMV-N-Flag-IGF2BP3 (Ov-IGF2BP3) or with pCMV-N-Flag control vector (Ov-NC) from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology using Invitrogen® Lipofectamine™ 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C for 48 h. RT-qPCR and western blot analyses were subsequently used to assess the cell transfection efficiency at 48 h post-infection.
Colony formation assay
Following cell transfection, SKOV3 cells were seeded (1.5×103 cells/well) into a 6-well plate. After 14 days, the medium was discarded, and the clones were fixed with methanol for 15 min at room temperature. Subsequently, crystal violet was used to stain the cells for 20 min at room temperature. The numbers of clones with >10 cells were counted manually under a light microscope. The number of clones: (cell number >10 cells/colony) ×100%.
Wound healing assay
SKOV3 cells were seeded onto 6-well plates (density, 1×106 cells/ml) and cultured to 80% confluence. After cell transfection, a scratch-wound assay was performed using a 10-µl pipette tip. The medium was replaced by DMEM without serum, and 1 µM 5-fluouracil (MilliporeSigma) was added to block cell proliferation after wounding. The widths of the wounds were measured after 0 and 24 h with a light microscope (magnification, ×200). The cell migration rate was calculated as follows: (Initial width-final width)/Initial width.
Transwell assay
The upper compartment surface of the bottom membrane of the Transwell chamber was coated with Matrigel™ (50 mg/l; 1:8 diluted solution; BD Biosciences) at room temperature for 24 h and air-dried at 4°C. The culture in the culture plate was removed, and serum-free DMEM containing 10 mg/ml BSA (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.) was added to each well at 37°C for 30 min. Subsequently, the treated cells suspended in 200 µl serum-free DMEM were seeded onto the upper chamber membranes of 24-well 8-µm pore Transwell insert (Costar; Corning, Inc.) at a density of 1×104 cells/ml. DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, the membrane was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and sequentially stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 30 min (all at room temperature). The inside of the membrane was gently wiped with a cotton swab. Finally, the numbers of cells were counted under a light microscope.
Tube formation assay
Matrigel™ (BD Biosciences) was used to detect the tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). A total of 5×104 HUVECs were plated and co-cultured with the same amount of SKOV3 cells transfected with sh-SIX4#2 and Ov-IGF2BP3 on a 96-well plate precoated with Matrigel™ (50 µl/well) for 30 min at 37°C. After 12 h, the enclosed networks of tubes from six random high-power microscope fields were examined under a light microscope. The mean value of 10 cumulative total lengths per well represented an experimental point. The number of tubes was assessed using ImageJ 1.52 k software (version 1.46; National Institutes of Health).
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay
A RIP RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (MilliporeSigma) was used to conduct RIP assays. Cells were lysed in Invitrogen RIP buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) after being collected by centrifugation at 200 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Then, 100 µl cell lysate was pre-cleared with 50 ul protein A/G magnetic beads (MilliporeSigma) which were conjugated to 5 µg anti-SIX4 antibody (1:500 dilution; cat. no LS-C101744; LifeSpan BioSciences, Inc.) or 5 µg anti-IgG antibody (1:50 dilution; cat. no ab172730; Abcam). A protein-RNA complex was captured and digested with 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K containing 0.1% SDS to extract RNA. The magnetic beads were repeatedly washed with RIP washing buffer to remove non-specific adsorption. Finally, the expression levels of SIX4 were determined using an RT-qPCR assay as described above.
Actinomycin D treatment
Following transfection, the cells were treated with 2 mg/ml actinomycin D (MedChemExpress) for 0, 3, 6, 9 or 12 h at 37°C. The mRNA levels of SIX4 following actinomycin treatment were subsequently measured using an RT-qPCR assay as described above.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated independently three times. SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp.) was employed for statistical analysis. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. Comparisons between two groups were performed using unpaired Student's t-test, whereas comparisons among multiple groups were performed with one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
SIX4 is highly expressed in OC
The GEPIA database analysis revealed that SIX4 was highly expressed in OC tissues compared with tissues from healthy subjects (Fig. 1A). Subsequently, the ENCORI database was employed to reveal that high expression levels of SIX4 were associated with low OS rates in patients with OC (Fig. 1B). The human normal ovarian epithelial cell line (IOSE-80) and the OC cell lines (A2780, OVCAR3 and SKOV3) were selected for subsequent experiments as previously described (19). Western blot and RT-qPCR analyses were used to detect the expression levels of SIX4 in cells. The results obtained revealed that, compared with those in the IOSE-80 cells, the expression levels of SIX4 were significantly increased in the A2780, OVCAR3 and SKOV3 cells (Fig. 1C and D). Furthermore, SIX4 displayed the highest expression in SKOV3 cells among all selected OC cells; therefore, SKOV3 cells were selected for the follow-up experiments.
Interference with SIX4 inhibits the proliferation of SKOV3 cells
Transfection was used to interfere with SIX4 expression in SKOV3 cells, and the transfection efficiency was assessed by RT-qPCR and western blot analyses. The results demonstrated that, compared with those in the sh-NC control group, the expression levels of SIX4 in the sh-SIX4#1 and sh-SIX4#2 groups were significantly decreased, indicating successful transfection (Fig. 2A and B). The sh-SIX4#2 group was demonstrated to exhibit a better interference efficiency. Therefore, this group was selected for follow-up experiments.
A CCK-8 assay was then used to assess the viability of the cells following interference with SIX4. The results revealed that, compared with the sh-NC control group, the cell survival rate of the sh-SIX4#2 group was significantly decreased at 48 and 72 h (Fig. 2C). A colony formation assay subsequently demonstrated that cell proliferation was significantly decreased in the sh-SIX4#2 group compared with the sh-NC group (Fig. 2D).
Interference with SIX4 expression inhibits the migration, invasion and tube formation of SKOV3 cells
Subsequently, the effects of interference with SIX4 expression on the migration, invasion and tube formation of SKOV3 cells were examined, and it was found that the invasion and migration of the sh-SIX4#2 group were significantly reduced compared with those of the sh-NC control group (Fig. 3A-D). Subsequently tube formation assay was performed to detect the tube formation of the HUVECs. The results obtained revealed that, compared with the sh-NC group, the tube formation of the sh-SIX4#2 group was significantly decreased (Fig. 3E and F). Western blot analysis was then used to investigate the expression levels of the metastasis- and angiogenesis-associated proteins E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Snail, as well as VEGF. The results demonstrated that, the expression levels of E-cadherin in the sh-SIX4#2 group were significantly increased, whereas the expression levels of N-cadherin, Snail and VEGF were significantly decreased compared with the sh-NC group (Fig. 3G), suggesting that interference with SIX4 expression could lead to an inhibition of the metastasis and angiogenesis of SKOV3 cells.
IGF2BP3 increases the stability of SIX4 mRNA
The GEPIA database analysis revealed that IGF2BP3 was highly expressed in OC tissues (Fig. 4A). In addition, a statistically significant positive correlation between the expression levels of IGF2BP3 and SIX4 in OC tissues was also identified (Fig. 4B). Western blot and RT-qPCR analyses revealed that IGF2BP3 expression in SKOV3 cells was abnormally elevated compared with that in IOSE-80 cells (Fig. 4C and D). Subsequently, a RIP assay was used to assess the binding ability of IGF2BP3 and SIX4 mRNA, and the results revealed that, compared with the control group, the expression levels of SIX4 in the IGF2BP3 group were significantly increased, indicating the binding of IGF2BP3 and SIX4 (Fig. 4E). Subsequently, transfection was used to interfere with IGF2BP3 expression in SKOV3 cells, and the transfection efficiency was determined by western blot and RT-qPCR analyses (Fig. 4F and G). Since the shRNA sh-IGF2BP3#2 was demonstrated to have the best interference efficiency, sh-IGF2BP3#2 was selected for subsequent experiments. Following actinomycin D treatment, the stability of SIX4 mRNA was detected by an RT-qPCR assay. The results demonstrated that, compared with the sh-NC group, the stability of SIX4 decreased sharply upon inhibiting IGF2BP3 expression (Fig. 4H), indicating that IGF2BP3 could stabilize SIX4 expression. In addition, it was found that the expression levels of SIX4 were significantly decreased following the inhibition of IGF2BP3 expression in comparison with the sh-NC group, with lowest SIX4 expression when treated with Actinomycin D at 12 h (Fig. 4I and J). These results suggested that IGF2BP3 could improve the stability of SIX4 mRNA in SKOV3 cells.
IGF2BP3-stabilized SIX4 promotes the proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation of SKOV3 cells
To further explore the regulatory role of IGF2BP3/SIX4 in SKOV3 cells, IGF2BP3 was overexpressed (Fig. 5A and B), and the cells were divided into the control, sh-SIX4#2, sh-SIX4#2+Ov-NC and sh-SIX4#2+Ov-IGF2BP3 treatment groups. The results obtained from the CCK-8 and colony formation assays demonstrated that, compared with the sh-SIX4#2+Ov-NC group, the cell viability of the sh-SIX4#2+Ov-IGF2BP3 group was significantly increased at 72 h (Fig. 5C), and the impeded cell proliferation caused by SIX4 silencing was restored by IGF2BP3 overexpression (Fig. 5D). In addition, the wound healing and Transwell assay results revealed that, compared with the sh-SIX4#2+Ov-NC group, the invasion and migration rates of the cells in the sh-SIX4#2+Ov-IGF2BP3 group were significantly increased (Fig. 6A-D). Compared with the sh-SIX4#2+Ov-NC group, the tube formation of the sh-SIX4#2+Ov-IGF2BP3 group was significantly increased (Fig. 6E and F). Western blotting was subsequently used to detect the protein expression levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Snail and VEGF, and the results obtained demonstrated that overexpression of IGF2BP3 could reverse the regulation of these metastasis- and angiogenesis-associated proteins following the inhibition of SIX4 (Fig. 6G). Collectively, these results suggested that IGF2BP3-stabilized SIX4 could promote the proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation of SKOV3 cells.
Discussion
The pathogenesis and treatment of OC have for a long time provided a focus for biomedical research. In the present study, the effects of SIX4 on OC cell proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis were studied, and the underlying mechanism was discussed.
Solid tumor growth is dependent upon continuous and extensive tumor angiogenesis, which provides nutrients and oxygen to tumor tissue and also the means for tumor tissue metastasis (20,21). OC has the highest mortality rate among the different types of gynecological tumors, and exhibits clear characteristics of easy metastasis (22,23). The invasion, growth and metastasis of OC are largely dependent on the formation of an abundant blood supply (24). Folkman (25) first proposed treating tumors via inhibiting tumor angiogenesis in 1971. In recent years, several studies have demonstrated that inhibition of tumor angiogenesis can inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells, thereby inhibiting the occurrence and development of tumors (21,26,27). Therefore, the focus of the present study was to explore the possibility of a novel type of OC therapy via inhibiting the angiogenesis of OC.
SIX4 fulfills an important role in the development of multiple tumors. A previous study indicated that the upregulation of SIX4 is an indicator of poor clinical prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and that this leads to the promotion of tumor growth and cell metastasis (8). SIX4 is able to promote hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via upregulation of the proteins Yes associated transcriptional regulator 1 and C-Met (28). Notably, in colorectal cancer cells, SIX4 increases the expression levels of VEGF-A in conjunction with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and upregulation of SIX4 has been demonstrated to promote tumor growth and angiogenesis (29). These results suggested that SIX4 has an important role in cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. The GEPIA database analysis revealed that SIX4 is highly expressed in OC tissues. High expression levels of SIX4 were associated with low OS rates in patients with OC. Cell experiments in the present study also demonstrated that SIX4 expression is abnormally elevated in OC cells. Interference with the expression of SIX4 can therefore lead to inhibition of OC cell proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation.
Subsequently, the present study provided novel insights into the regulatory mechanism of SIX4. The expression levels of IGF2BP3 and SIX4 were positively correlated according to GEPIA database analysis. The m6A reader IGF2BP3 has an important role in the regulation of angiogenesis in gastric cancer cells. In colon cancer cells, IGF2BP3 has been demonstrated to bind to the m6A-modified region of VEGF mRNA to regulate the expression and stability of VEGF mRNA, thereby inhibiting the angiogenesis of colon cancer (30). In addition, studies have reported that high expression level of IGF2BP3 is a marker of poor prognosis of clear cell OC (31,32). In the present study, GEPIA database analysis revealed that IGF2BP3 was highly expressed in tissues from patients with OC. IGF2BP3 was also highly expressed in OC cell lines. Furthermore, the experiments performed in the present study demonstrated that IGF2BP3 can improve the stability of SIX4 mRNA. Subsequently, the associated mechanism was further investigated by inhibiting the expression of SIX4 and overexpressing IGF2BP3. These experiments revealed that the overexpression of IGF2BP3 could reverse the inhibitory effect of SIX4 on the malignant progression of SKOV3 cells, suggesting that IGF2BP3 regulates the function of SIX4 during the malignant progression of OC.
To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to investigate the role of SIX4 and IGF2BP3 in SKOV3 OC cells and the regulatory relationship between them. In the present study, the mechanism of OC was explored through the combination of bioinformatics and experiments. However, the present study also had certain limitations. First of all, the existing conclusions were not further verified in clinical samples and animal experiments, and our research group will further verify them in future experiments. In addition, in the mechanism experiments, only experiments on interference of SIX4 were conducted, while no experiments on overexpression of SIX4 in cells were conducted. The mechanism will be further investigated through overexpression of SIX4 in future experiments.
In conclusion, it may be determined from the present study that IGF2BP3-stabilized SIX4 is able to promote the proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation of SKOV3 cells. Furthermore, the present study also provides a theoretical basis for the improved understanding of the mechanism of OC, which will hopefully facilitate the treatment of OC.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
JH designed and performed experiments. XH analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. JH edited the manuscript. JH and XH confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Cook DP and Vanderhyden BC: Ovarian cancer and the evolution of subtype classifications using transcriptional profilingdagger. Biol Reprod. 101:645–658. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kroeger PT Jr and Drapkin R: Pathogenesis and heterogeneity of ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 29:26–34. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bowtell DD, Böhm S, Ahmed AA, Aspuria PJ, Bast RC Jr, Beral V, Berek JS, Birrer MJ, Blagden S, Bookman MA, et al: Rethinking ovarian cancer II: Reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 15:668–679. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koutsaki M, Libra M, Spandidos DA and Zaravinos A: The miR-200 family in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 8:66629–66640. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yang WL, Lu Z and Bast RC Jr: The role of biomarkers in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 17:577–591. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, Ledermann J, McCluggage WG, McNeish I, Morice P, Pignata S, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I, et al: ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: Pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent diseasedagger. Ann Oncol. 30:672–705. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang J, Jiang TY, Jiang BG, Yang C, Tan YX, Yang N, Pan YF, Ding ZW, Yang GZ, Wu MC, et al: RMP predicts survival and adjuvant TACE response in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 6:3432–3442. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li Y, Jiang X, Yan X and Wang Y: Upregulation of SIX4 indicates poor clinical outcome and promotes tumor growth and cell metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thorac Cancer. 12:752–759. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun X, Ma J, Chen Q, Hou Z, Luo X, Wang G, Wang J, Hu J and Cao Z: SIX4 promotes metastasis through STAT3 activation in breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 10:224–236. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Na XY, Shang XS, Zhao Y, Ren PP and Hu XQ: miR-203a functions as a tumor suppressor in bladder cancer by targeting SIX4. Neoplasma. 66:211–221. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tang X, Yang Y, Song X, Liu X, Wang X, Huang F, Li Y, Chen F and Wan H: SIX4 acts as a master regulator of oncogenes that promotes tumorigenesis in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 516:851–857. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Johnston MJ, Bar-Cohen S, Paroush Z and Nystul TG: Phosphorylated Groucho delays differentiation in the follicle stem cell lineage by providing a molecular memory of EGFR signaling in the niche. Development. 143:4631–4642. 2016. | |
Taniuchi K, Furihata M, Hanazaki K, Saito M and Saibara T: IGF2BP3-mediated translation in cell protrusions promotes cell invasiveness and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 5:6832–6845. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu H, Zeng Z, Afsharpad M, Lin C, Wang S, Yang H, Liu S, Kelemen LE, Xu W, Ma W, et al: Overexpression of IGF2BP3 as a potential oncogene in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 9:15702019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hsu KF, Shen MR, Huang YF, Cheng YM, Lin SH, Chow NH, Cheng SW, Chou CY and Ho CL: Overexpression of the RNA-binding proteins Lin28B and IGF2BP3 (IMP3) is associated with chemoresistance and poor disease outcome in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 113:414–424. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li C, Tang Z, Zhang W, Ye Z and Liu F: GEPIA2021: Integrating multiple deconvolution-based analysis into GEPIA. Nucleic Acids Res. 49:W242–W246. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH and Yang JH: StarBase v2.0: Decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42:D92–D97. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiao H, Zheng Y, Chen J and Shen H: miR-198 inhibits proliferation, invasion and migration of ovarian cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Acta Biochim Pol. 68:673–677. 2021. | |
Viallard C and Larrivee B: Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: Alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis. 20:409–426. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Unterleuthner D, Neuhold P, Schwarz K, Janker L, Neuditschko B, Nivarthi H, Crncec I, Kramer N, Unger C, Hengstschläger M, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived WNT2 increases tumor angiogenesis in colon cancer. Angiogenesis. 23:159–177. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grunewald T and Ledermann JA: Targeted therapies for ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 41:139–152. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yousefi M, Dehghani S, Nosrati R, Ghanei M, Salmaninejad A, Rajaie S, Hasanzadeh M and Pasdar A: Current insights into the metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer-hopes and hurdles. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 43:515–538. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He L, Zhu W, Chen Q, Yuan Y, Wang Y, Wang J and Wu X: Ovarian cancer cell-secreted exosomal miR-205 promotes metastasis by inducing angiogenesis. Theranostics. 9:8206–8220. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 285:1182–1186. 1971. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li S, Xu HX, Wu CT, Wang WQ, Jin W, Gao HL, Li H, Zhang SR, Xu JZ, Qi ZH, et al: Angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer: Current research status and clinical implications. Angiogenesis. 22:15–36. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ramjiawan RR, Griffioen AW and Duda DG: Anti-angiogenesis for cancer revisited: Is there a role for combinations with immunotherapy? Angiogenesis. 20:185–204. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He Q, Lin Z, Wang Z, Huang W, Tian D, Liu M and Xia L: SIX4 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through upregulating YAP1 and c-MET. Oncogene. 39:7279–7295. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun X, Hu F, Hou Z, Chen Q, Lan J, Luo X, Wang G, Hu J and Cao Z: SIX4 activates Akt and promotes tumor angiogenesis. Exp Cell Res. 383:1114952019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang Z, Wang T, Wu D, Min Z, Tan J and Yu B: RNA N6-methyladenosine reader IGF2BP3 regulates cell cycle and angiogenesis in colon cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 39:2032020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kobel M, Xu H, Bourne PA, Spaulding BO, Shih IeM, Mao TL, Soslow RA, Ewanowich CA, Kalloger SE, Mehl E, et al: IGF2BP3 (IMP3) expression is a marker of unfavorable prognosis in ovarian carcinoma of clear cell subtype. Mod Pathol. 22:469–475. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Noske A, Faggad A, Wirtz R, Darb-Esfahani S, Sehouli J, Sinn B, Nielsen FC, Weichert W, Buckendahl AC, Röske A, et al: IMP3 expression in human ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 28:203–210. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar |