![Open Access](/resources/images/iconopenaccess.png)
CTBP1‑AS upregulation is associated with polycystic ovary syndrome and can be effectively downregulated by cryptotanshinone
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 1, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2022.12761
- Article Number: 245
-
Copyright: © Wen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrinopathies; it is characterized by a number of clinical symptoms, including menstrual disorders, hyperandrogenism, infertility, insulin resistance, hirsutism, obesity and cystic ovaries (1–3). The worldwide incidence of PCOS is 5–10% among women of reproductive age, and it accounted for 70% of ovulation barrier sterility (4–6). Early diagnosis and timely treatment can contribute to the mitigation of the PCOS and may help in avoiding associated metabolic complications (7). However, due to the fact that many of the symptoms and signs of PCOS are also normal in puberty, PCOS diagnose criteria needs to be improved to prevent overdiagnosis of the syndrome (3,8). The Rotterdam diagnostic criteria for PCOS is the most widely used standard and includes hyperandrogenism, chronic anovulation (oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhea) and polycystic ovary morphology (volume of the ovary >10 cm3 or at least 12 follicles measuring 2–9 mm) (9–11). Ruling out hyperandrogenism caused by other endocrinopathies, a patient with any two of above three criteria can be diagnosed with PCOS (12).
Confirmation of the etiology is key to determining the treatment of PCOS. To date, environmental factors and genetic factors are thought to be involved (13), including diet, unhealthy lifestyle and certain diseases (such as thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia and androgen-secreting tumors). Apart from these, a large number of genes have been identified as serving a role in the development of PCOS, such as GDF9 and androgen receptor (AR). Androgenic effect, exerted through the AR, is regarded as one of the most predominant mechanisms responsible for PCOS (14,15). As a steroid receptor and nuclear transcription factor, AR can control the expression of downstream target genes (16–18). In theory, hyperandrogenism is influenced by the changes of testosterone (T) level and AR activity. Previous studies have demonstrated that AR functions as a dynamic heterocomplex with a number of coactivators and corepressors (19–23). C-terminal-binding protein 1 antisense (CTBP1-AS) is a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) that can directly suppress CTBP1 expression through sense-antisense binding, which subsequently promotes the transcriptional activity of AR (24,25). In addition to promoting prostate cancer progression (24), CTBP1-AS was also positively correlated with PCOS (12). However, the molecular mechanism of CTBP1-AS in PCOS remains largely unknown.
In the present study, the levels of CTBP1-AS were compared between patients with PCOS and healthy controls. The effects of CTBP1-AS on the proliferation and apoptosis of granulosa cells was explored, and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 and embryonic (EZH2) and ectoderm development protein (EED) were indicated to interact with CTBP1-AS in primary granulosa cells and KGN cells. Notably, it was demonstrated that the level of CTBP1-AS could be significantly reduced by treatment of cryptotanshinone. The present findings may reveal a new pathophysiological relevance of CTBP1-AS in PCOS and may provide new potential target for PCOS treatment.
Materials and methods
Isolation and culture of ovarian granulosa cells
A total of 60 patients with PCOS and 60 healthy controls were recruited to the present study. After ruling out hyperandrogenism caused by other endocrinopathy, the Rotterdam diagnostic criteria was used to diagnose PCOS, particularly those with any two of the following features: Hyperandrogenism, chronic anovulation (oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhea) and polycystic ovary morphology. All women with PCOS included in the study fulfilled all three criteria aforementioned; none of the healthy control women recruited in this study met any of the Rotterdam diagnostic criteria. All 120 patients were non-smokers, had no concurrent illness and took no regular medications prior to the study; a pregnancy test was performed prior to their inclusion in the study. The average age of patient group and control group were 29.21±4.78 and 29.43±3.82 years, respectively. No significant differences were identified for age or body mass index (BMI) between the wo groups (Table I). The present study was approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Hangzhou, China; approval no. 2020-K-060-02); all subjects provided signed consent forms prior to recruitment to the study.
![]() | Table I.Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients with PCOS and the healthy control patients. |
Both healthy controls and patients with PCOS were given clomiphene citrate at a dose of 50 mg/day on cycle days 5–9 to induce ovulation. Following ovulation induction, and 36 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (10,000 U) injection, two eggs were collected from each candidate using transvaginal ultrasound-guided retrieval; eggs from patients with PCOS were aspirated by an experienced operator before laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) surgery, whereas those from the healthy control patients were immediately collected through 19-gauge single-lumen aspiration needles (K-OPS-7035-REH-ET; Cook) to aspirate under a suction pressure of 80 mmHg. Eggs from patients and healthy control were both performed transvaginally under ultrasound guidance in conscious sedation with fentanyl 1 µg/kg IV (Fentanyl®, B. Braun Medical AB) and propofol 30–40 mg IV (Propofol-®Lipuro, B. Braun Medical AB) was given when needed. The granulosa cells were detached under a compact cell culture light microscope (Olympus CKX53, Olympus)and kept in follicular fluids. Granulosa cells were centrifuged at 395 × g for 15 min at 4°C, the precipitate was harvested and mixed with 50% v/v Percoll solution (cat. no. 65455-52-9; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and centrifuged again at 395 × g for 10 min to remove red blood cells. Then, 0.2 g/l collagenase I solution (cat. no. 9001-12-1; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used to resuspend and digest the granulosa cells for 30 min at 37°C followed by centrifugation as aforementioned. Cells were harvested and seeded into a 12-well cell culture plate at 1×105 cells/ml. Each well contained 1 ml RPMI-1640 medium (cat. no. SH30809.01; HyClone; Cytiva) with 10% fetal bovine serum (cat. no. FB25015; Clark Bioscience) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS; cat. no. SV30010; Hyclone; Cytiva). The cells were cultured in an incubator at 37°C with an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
KGN cell culture
The KGN human ovarian granulosa tumor cell line (cat. no. CL0544) was purchased from Hunan Fenghui Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and cultured in DMEM/F-12 at 37°C with 5% CO2 (cat. no. SH30023.01; HyClone; Cytiva) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PS.
RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
To verify the subcellular localization of CTBP1-AS, a DIG RNA Labeling Kit (cat. no. 11175025910; Roche Diagnostics) was used to label CTBP1-AS probe (synthesized by RiboBio) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The sequence of the CTBP1-AS probe, complementary to CTBP1-AS, was 5′-TCATCATAATTTCTTATCCTAAG-3′. A total of 50,000 primary granulosa cells were cultured on cover glasses in 24-well culture dishes for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. The cells were subsequently rinsed with PBS, fixed at room temperature in a solution of 3% formaldehyde and 10% acetic acid in PBS for 30 min, and then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, hybridization was performed in a moist chamber at 42°C overnight. Then, cells were washed by 4X saline sodium citrate) buffer with 0.1% Tween-20, and followed by 2X SSC, 1X SSC and PBS for 10 min at 42°C in dark. Cells were then blocked with 20% goat serum (cat. no. SL038; Beijing Solarbio) for 1 h at room temperature and followed by incubation with anti-DIG antibody (cat. no. 14682; Cell Signaling Technology) which diluted with 10% goat serum at 1:200 overnight at 4°C. After three washes with PBS, FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (diluted with 10% goat serum at 1:1,000, cat. no. ab6717; Abcam) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the nucleus was counterstained with DAPI (cat. no. C0065; Beijing Solarbio Science and Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 20 min at room temperature. Results were visualized at 400 magnification using a Leica DMI4000B inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH).
CTBP1-AS knockdown
For CTBP1-AS knockdown, two small interfering (si)RNAs were purchased from Sigma Genosys (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and their sequences are as follows: siCTBP1-AS #1, 5′-CCAAUUAAUUAGACCACAAAA-3′; siCTBP1-AS#2, 5′-CAACUGUCAAGAAACAAUUAG-3′. Scrambled Stealth RNAi™ Med GC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used as a negative control (siControl). Cells were seeded in 6-well plate and grown to ~40% confluence at the time of transfection. 200 pmol (20 µM) siCTBP1-AS #1, siCTBP1-AS #1 or siControl was respectively transfected at room temperature by using the Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (cat. no. 13778-150; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The transfected cells were grown in antibiotic free DMEM/F-12 (8119239, Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 24 h and then re-seeded and cultured for an additional 24 h for further experiments with the density of 200 cells/well for colony formation assay and 30,000 for Cryptotanshinone treatment and immunofluorescence detection assay.
RNA isolation and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was isolated with the High Purity Total RNA Extraction kit (cat. no. RP5611; BioTeke Corporation) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA with the super M-MLV reverse transcriptase (cat. no. PR6502; BioTeke Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. qPCR was conducted to analyze CTBP1-AS and β-actin expression levels. qPCR was performed on an Applied Biosystems 7300 cycler using SYBR Green PCR MasterMix (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Thermocycling parameters are as follows: 95°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 sec and 60°C for 30 sec with FAM acquisition. The primer sequences used were as follows: CTBP1-AS forward, 5′-AACCTGGCAGCACGGAAGT-3′; CTBP1-AS reverse, 5′-GAGCACAACCACCACCTCATC-3′; β-actin forward, 5′-CTGTGCCCATCTACGAGGGCTAT-3′; β-actin reverse, 5′-TTTGATGTCACGCACGATTTCC-3′. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (26) and normalized to β-actin.
Preparation of nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA
A total of 5×106 cells were harvested, washed with cold PBS and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was resuspended with cold nuclear fractionation buffer [140 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP-40 and 3 U/ml RNaseOUT (Thermo Fisher Scientific)]. After 5 min, the suspension was centrifuged 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected as the cytoplasmic fraction, whereas the pellet was further washed with fractionation buffer three additional time, centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C and used as the nuclear fraction. Total cytoplasmic and nuclear RNAs were extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and subsequently reverse transcribed to cDNA using super M-MLV reverse transcriptase (cat. no. PR6502; BioTeke Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primer sequences used were as follows: U48 forward, 5′-AGTGATGATGACCCCAGGTA-3′; U48 reverse, 5′-GGTCAGAGCGCTGCGGTGAT-3′; 7SL forward, 5′-GTAGCTTTTCGCAGCGTCTC-3′; 7SL reverse, 5′-GCACTACAGCCCAGAACTCC-3′. The relative expression of CTBP1-AS was detected as aforementioned and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (26) and normalized to U48 and 7SL for nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, respectively.
RNA pulldown and mass spectrometry analysis
Pierce Magnetic RNA-Protein Pull-Down Kit (cat. no. 20164; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to perform RNA pulldown assay according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, CTBP1-AS was synthesized by RiboBio Co. Ltd. and labeled using desthiobiotinylated cytidine bisphosphate and T4 RNA ligase. After labeling, CTBP1-AS was captured by streptavidin magnetic beads (50 µl), which was contained in the kit, in RNA capture buffer at room temperature for 30 min. 5×107 KGN cells in logarithmic growth phase were harvested and lysed with Pierce IP Lysis Buffer (cat. no. 87787, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with RNase inhibitor and protease/phosphatase inhibitor (cat. no. P0013; Beyotime). Subsequently, 1,000 µg protein lysate were added to Protein-RNA Binding Buffer equilibrated RNA-bound beads. The mixture was incubated overnight with rotation at 4°C. The beads were then rinsed with wash buffer three times followed by vortexing and separation using a magnetic stand. 50 µl Elution Buffer was added and incubated for 15–30 min at 37°C with agitation to elute the RNA-binding protein complex. After separation by the magnetic stand, the eluted samples were then harvested denatured for 10 min at 100°C in loading buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS (w/v), 0.1% BPB (w/v), 10% glycerol (v/v), 1% β-mercaptoethanol (v/v)] for SDS-PAGE electrophoresis followed closely by Coomassie brilliant blue staining and mass spectrometry analysis or western blotting detection. Mass spectrometry data was acquired by sending sample to Shanghai Bioprofile Ltd for mass spectrometry assay.
Western blotting
Protein concentrations from RNA pulldown assays were determined with a BCA Protein Assay Kit (cat. no. P0011; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Proteins were denatured for 10 min at 100°C in loading buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS (w/v), 0.1% BPB (w/v), 10% glycerol (v/v), 1% β-mercaptoethanol (v/v)], separated by SDS-PAGE (10%), transferred into PVDF membranes and blocked with 5% skim milk for 2 h at room temperature. Membranes were incubated with anti-EZH2 (cat. no. 5246; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) or anti-EED (cat. no. 85322; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) antibodies, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (cat. no. 7074S, Cell Signaling Technology). All antibodies were diluted with 5% skim milk at 1:1,000 and incubated with the membranes for 2 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized with the Tanon High-sig ECL Western Blotting Substrate (cat. no. 180-501; Tanon Science and Technology Co., Ltd.).
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
Cell viability was measured using CCK-8 assay (cat. no. CK04; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.). Briefly, 5,000 primary granulosa cells were seeded into 96-well plate and transfected for 24 h with 10 pmol siCTBP1-AS #1, siCTBP1-AS #2 or siControl at room temperature. Then, transfected cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 for ~24 h until the confluence reached 30–40%. 0, 24, 48 and 72 h later, CCK-8 solution was added and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using CMax Plus (Molecular Devices, LLC).
ELISA
Blood samples (5 ml) were collected from all participants. The serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin, estradiol (E2), total T, free T, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), as well as fasting glucose and fasting insulin were determined by commercial ELISA kits for Testosterone (cat. no. ab108666) and DHEAS (cat. no. ab108669) purchased from Abcam. All detection were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Flow cytometry detection of apoptosis
Cell apoptosis were detected using a FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (cat. no. 556547; BD Biosciences). Primary granulosa cells were cultured to 30–50% confluence in 6-well plate, and then transfected with siRNAs for 48 h. Cells were harvested, washed with cold PBS and stained with propidium iodide (PI) alone or PI and Annexin V-FITC for 20 min at room temperature. Data were obtained using CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and analyzed by CytExpert software (Beckman Coulter, Inc.version 2.3).
Colony formation assay
SiCTBP1-AS #1, siCTBP1-AS #2 or siControl transfected primary granulosa cells were plated at 200 cells/well in 6-well dishes and cultured for 2–3 weeks in DMEM/F-12 (8119239, Gibco) at 37°C with 5% CO2, supplemented with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum, FB25015, Clark) and 1% PS (penicillin-streptomycin, SV30010, Hyclone) and washed with PBS. The cells were fixed in cold methanol for 30 min. Fixed colonies were visualized by incubating the cells with 0.5% (w/v) crystal violet for 30 min. Residual crystal violet was rinsed away with three washes with PBS. Visible colonies, consisting of ≥50 cells, were counted. Each experiment was repeated three times.
Cryptotanshinone treatment and immunofluorescence
A total of 30,000 KGN cells were cultured on cover glasses in 24-well culture dishes. After 24 h incubation, different concentrations cryptotanshinone (5 µM in Fig. 4 and 0, 2.5, 5, 10 µM for Fig. S3) was added and the cells were incubated for another 24 h. The cells were rinsed with PBS, fixed in a solution of 3% formaldehyde and 10% acetic acid in PBS for 30 min at room temperature and then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, cells were incubated with diluted (1:500) anti-5-methylcytosine (5mC) antibody (cat. no. ab10805; Abcam) to label methylated DNA overnight at 4°C and the nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (5 µg/ml) for 20 min at room temperature. Results were visualized and images captured under a Leica DMI4000B inverted fluorescence microscope and analyzed by Leica Application Suite V4 software (Leica Microsystems GmbH).
Analyzing the promoter region of CTBP1-AS
To analyze the promoter region of CTBP1-AS, we recruited the UCSC Genome Browser database (genome.ucsc.edu). CTBP1-AS (Homo sapiens, NR_104331) was used to analyze the CpG island existed in the promoter region.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Comparisons of non-normally distributed variables between clinicopathological characteristics of healthy control and patients with PCOS (Table I) and the comparisons of CTBP1-AS level in healthy controls and patients with PCOS (Fig. 1) were determined using Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post hoc test. were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Student's t test was used to determine the statistical significance when only two groups were compared, and when three groups or more were compared, ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM Corp.). All the experiments were repeated three times.
Results
CTBP1-AS is upregulated in PCOS
To investigate whether CTBP1-AS served a role in PCOS, 60 patients with PCOS and 60 healthy controls were recruited to the present study; there were no significant differences in age and BMI (Table I). ELISA serum analysis results demonstrated that patients with PCOS had higher levels of total T, free T, DHEAS, FSH, LH and fasting insulin than controls (Table I). However, no significant differences were identified for the concentrations E2, SHBG, prolactin and fasting glucose between the two groups.
Two oocytes were harvested from each patient and the ovarian granulosa cells were separated, cultured and subsequently used to detect the expression level of CTBP1-AS by RT-qPCR. Compared with healthy controls, the level of CTBP1-AS was significantly higher in patients with PCOS (Fig. 1A). Total T levels were notably different among patients with PCOS; therefore, the patients with PCOS were divided into high T and normal T group. Both groups exhibited higher levels of CTBP1-AS compared with the control group (Fig. 1B). These data suggested that CTBP1-AS may participate in PCOS process. Next, the localization of CTBP1-AS in granulosa cells was examined using RNA FISH. Consistent with a previous report (24), CTBP1-AS was expressed throughout the nucleus (Fig. 1C). To further evaluate the distribution of CTBP1-AS in granulosa cells, the expression levels in cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were analyzed by RT-qPCR. The results demonstrated that the CTBP1-AS levels in the nucleus were ~150 times than that of the expression in cytoplasm (Fig. S1).
CTBP1-AS balances proliferation and apoptosis of granulosa cells
To further investigate the biological significance of CTBP1-AS in PCOS, CTBP1-AS expression was knocked down using siRNA. As shown in Fig. 2A, the expression levels of CTBP1-AS were significantly decreased in primary granulosa cells transfected with siCTBP1-AS #1 and siCTBP1 #2 compared with siControl transfected cells. The proliferative ability of granulosa cells was examined through CCK-8 assays, and the results demonstrated that proliferation was significantly inhibited by the siCTBP1-AS transfections compared with the control (Fig. 2B). Colony formation assays further demonstrated that CTBP1-AS knockdown suppressed the colony formation ability of primary granulosa cells compared with the control group (Fig. S2). In addition, the effect of CTBP1-AS on granulosa cell apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry. The results showed that the number of both apoptotic and necrotic cells significantly increased following CTBP1-AS knockdown (Fig. 2C and D). Taken together, these results indicated that CTBP1-AS may facilitate PCOS through balancing the proliferative and apoptotic rates of granulosa cells.
CTBP1 directly interacts with EZH2 and EED in granulosa cells
As CTBP1-AS could recruit and bind PTB-associated splicing factor in prostate cancer cells (24), the present study attempted to identify the interacting proteins of CTBP1-AS in granulosa cells using RNA pulldown and mass spectrometry. As shown in Fig. 3A, the enrichment efficiency of CTBP1-AS was ~9 times higher compared with the control group. After incubation with cell lysate, the mixture was collected and examined by SDS-PAGE, followed closely by Coomassie brilliant blue staining. The specific bands were further analyzed by mass spectrometry, and two Polycomb-group proteins, EZH2 and EED, were of particular interest (Fig. 3B). Both proteins make up the core catalytic subunits of Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and PRC2 is responsible for catalyzing histone 3, lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) on chromatin (26,27). The interaction was further confirmed in primary granulosa cells and KGN cells by RNA pulldown (Fig. 3C). It was inferred from these results that CTBP1-AS may regulate PCOS through EZH2- and EED-dependent H3K27me3 methylation.
Cryptotanshinone effectively reduces the level of CTBP1-AS in KGN cells
Cryptotanshinone can ameliorate insulin resistance and androgen excess in a PCOS rat model (28,29), but the molecular mechanism is still not fully understood. To better elucidate this mechanism, KGN cells were treated with 5 µM cryptotanshinone for 24 h (Fig. 4A). The results of 5mC immunofluorescence staining suggested that the methylation level of the whole genome had a positive association with the concentration of cryptotanshinone (Fig. S3). Immunofluorescence intensity induced by 10 µM cryptotanshinone was weaker compared with that induced by 5 µM (Fig. S3); it was speculated that this may be caused by the cytotoxicity of cryptotanshinone. Furthermore, UCSC Genome Browser analysis showed that there existed CpG island in the promoter region of CTBP1-AS (Fig. 4B); therefore, we hypothesized that cryptotanshinone may regulate the level of CTBP1-AS through methylation. Consistent with this, cryptotanshinone treatment significantly inhibited the level of CTBP1-AS (Fig. 4C). These results indicated that CTBPA1-AS may be a potential target of cryptotanshinone for PCOS treatment.
Discussion
As the main functional cells in the ovaries, granulosa cells participate in the development of follicles and steroid secretion (30). Atresia is usually triggered by oocyte apoptosis followed by granulosa cell apoptosis in the early stage of follicular development; however, granulosa cell apoptosis initiates atresia in mature follicles (31). Communication between oocytes and granulosa cells lasts throughout the oocyte cell development process. Granulosa cells can provide nutrients and growth factors for oocyte cells, and oocytes promote the growth and differentiation of granulosa cells (32). Previous reports have demonstrated that dysfunction of these cells induces abnormal follicle and related to PCOS (33,34); however, the molecular mechanism is still unknown. AR is generally thought to be closely related to PCOS, and lncRNA CTBP1-AS has been demonstrated to serve a role in PCOS regulation through AR (12). In the present study, the expression levels of CTBP1-AS were compared in the granulosa cells from 60 patients with PCOS and 60 healthy control patients. The data revealed that CTBP1-AS is upregulated in patients with PCOS, and knockdown of CTBP1-AS could significantly inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of granulosa cells in vitro.
Polycomb group proteins are considered paradigmatic epigenetic modulators that regulate cell proliferation and differentiation, and organ development, as well as initiation and progression of certain diseases, such as prostate cancer and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), through remodeling the chromatin structure and subsequent transcriptional repression (35). EZH2 and EED are the two core catalytic subunits of PRC2 and are required for histone H3 methylation (35). In prostate cancer, AR directly binds to the promoter and enhancer of EZH2 to regulate its expression (36). However, in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells, EZH2 can directly bind to and regulate AR (37). A recent study showed that EZH2 and EED could bind AR to regulate its expression level and the expression of downstream target genes (35). A previous study by Takayama et al (24) demonstrated that CTBP1-AS could promote AR transcriptional activity in prostate cancer. However, whether there exists interaction between EZH2, EED and CTBP1-AS is still not clear. The present study identified an interaction between these components in granulosa cells in patients with PCOS, which may provide a potential target for PCOS treatment.
Results from the present study demonstrated that the traditional Chinese medicine, cryptotanshinone, could effectively decrease the expression level of CTBP1-AS. CpG islands can be found in the promoter region of CTBP1-AS, and the methylation of this region could inhibit its transcription. Therefore, drugs that target the methylation of CTBP1-AS CpG islands may provide a new direction for PCOS treatment.
In conclusion, the present study results demonstrated an upregulated expression level of CTBP1-AS in PCOS granulosa cells and identified the interaction between CTBP1-AS and the Polycomb group proteins, EZH2 and EED. Most importantly, results demonstrated the efficiency of cryptotanshinone in reducing the level of CTBP1-AS expression. However, there are limitations to the present study. As PCOS is a complex pathological process caused by many factors, the effects of up- or downregulation of CTBP1-AS in a PCOS model was not comprehensively verified by in vitro and in vivo experiments. Therefore, additional studies are needed to further clarify the role of CTBP1-AS in PCOS.
Supplementary Material
Supporting Data
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant no. LY20H290007).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
MW contributed to experimental data analyses and wrote the manuscript. SZ, BW, JX, WZ and FW contributed experimental data. XD designed the experiments and supervised the research. MW and XD confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Hangzhou, China; approval no. 2020-K-060-02); all subjects provided signed consent forms prior to recruitment to the study.
Patient consent for publication
All the patients in this project signed the consent forms.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Mortada R and Williams T: Metabolic syndrome: Polycystic ovary syndrome. FP Essent. 435:30–42. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hardiman P, Pillay OS and Atiomo W: Polycystic ovary syndrome and endometrial carcinoma. Lancet. 361:1810–1812. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Akgül S, Düzçeker Y, Kanbur N and Derman O: Do different diagnostic criteria impact polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis for adolescents? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 31:258–262. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G and Azziz R: Polycystic ovary syndrome: Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 7:219–231. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Asunción M, Calvo RM, Millán JL, Sancho J, Avila S and Escobar-Morreale HF: A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:2434–2438. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Amiri M, Tehrani FR, Bidhendi-Yarandi R, Behboudi-Gandevani S, Azizi F and Carmina E: Relationships between biochemical markers of hyperandrogenism and metabolic parameters in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Horm Metab Res. 51:22–34. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fitzgerald S, DiVasta A and Gooding H: An update on PCOS in adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr. 30:459–465. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Szydlarska D, Machaj M and Jakimiuk A: History of discovery of polycystic ovary syndrome. Adv Clin Exp Med. 26:555–558. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group, : Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 81:19–25. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Neven ACH, Laven J, Teede HJ and Boyle JA: A summary on polycystic ovary syndrome: Diagnostic criteria, prevalence, clinical manifestations, and management according to the latest international guidelines. Semin Reprod Med. 36:5–12. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang R and Mol BWJ: The Rotterdam criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: Evidence-based criteria? Hum Reprod. 32:261–264. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Z, Hao C, Song D, Zhang N, Bao H and Qu Q: Androgen receptor coregulator CTBP1-AS is associated with polycystic ovary syndrome in Chinese women: A preliminary study. Reprod Sci. 22:829–837. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Patel S: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), an inflammatory, systemic, lifestyle endocrinopathy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 182:27–36. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sung YA, Oh JY, Chung H and Lee H: Hyperandrogenemia is implicated in both the metabolic and reproductive morbidities of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 101:840–845. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Norman RJ, Dewailly D, Legro RS and Hickey TE: Polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet. 370:685–697. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gelmann EP: Molecular biology of the androgen receptor. J Clin Oncol. 20:3001–3015. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Meng D, Yang S, Wan X, Zhang Y, Huang W, Zhao P, Li T, Wang L, Huang Y, Li T and Li Y: A transcriptional target of androgen receptor, miR-421 regulates proliferation and metabolism of prostate cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 73:30–40. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takayama KI: Splicing factors have an essential role in prostate cancer progression and androgen receptor signaling. Biomolecules. 9:1312019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baculescu N: The role of androgen receptor activity mediated by the CAG repeat polymorphism in the pathogenesis of PCOS. J Med Life. 6:18–25. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bevan CL, Hoare S, Claessens F, Heery DM and Parker MG: The AF1 and AF2 domains of the androgen receptor interact with distinct regions of SRC1. Mol Cell Biol. 19:8383–8392. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu J, Qiu Y, DeMayo FJ, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ and O'Malley BW: Partial hormone resistance in mice with disruption of the steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) gene. Science. 279:1922–1925. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng S, Brzostek S, Lee SR, Hollenberg AN and Balk SP: Inhibition of the dihydrotestosterone-activated androgen receptor by nuclear receptor corepressor. Mol Endocrinol. 16:1492–1501. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berrevoets CA, Umar A, Trapman J and Brinkmann AO: Differential modulation of androgen receptor transcriptional activity by the nuclear receptor co-repressor (N-CoR). Biochem J. 379:731–738. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takayama KI, Horie-Inoue K, Katayama S, Suzuki T, Tsutsumi S, Ikeda K, Urano T, Fujimura T, Takagi K, Takahashi S, et al: Androgen-responsive long noncoding RNA CTBP1-AS promotes prostate cancer. EMBO J. 32:1665–1680. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takayama K, Tsutsumi S, Katayama S, Okayama T, Horie-Inoue K, Ikeda K, Urano T, Kawazu C, Hasegawa A, Ikeo K, et al: Integration of cap analysis of gene expression and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis on array reveals genome-wide androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 30:619–630. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Czermin B, Melfi R, McCabe D, Seitz V, Imhof A and Pirrotta V: Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites. Cell. 111:185–196. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Montgomery ND, Yee D, Chen A, Kalantry S, Chamberlain SJ, Otte AP and Magnuson T: The murine polycomb group protein Eed is required for global histone H3 lysine-27 methylation. Curr Biol. 15:942–947. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ji XY, Tan B and Zhu YZ: Salvia miltiorrhiza and ischemic diseases. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 21:1089–1094. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X, Morris-Natschke SL and Lee KH: New developments in the chemistry and biology of the bioactive constituents of Tanshen. Med Res Rev. 27:133–148. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Havelock JC, Rainey WE and Carr BR: Ovarian granulosa cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 228:67–78. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Morita Y and Tilly JL: Oocyte apoptosis: Like sand through an hourglass. Dev Biol. 213:1–17. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Buccione R, Schroeder AC and Eppig JJ: Interactions between somatic cells and germ cells throughout mammalian oogenesis. Biol Reprod. 43:543–547. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Erickson GF, Magoffin DA, Garzo VG, Cheung AP and Chang RJ: Granulosa cells of polycystic ovaries: Are they normal or abnormal? Hum Reprod. 7:293–299. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jakimiuk AJ, Weitsman SR, Navab A and Magoffin DA: Luteinizing hormone receptor, steroidogenesis acute regulatory protein, and steroidogenic enzyme messenger ribonucleic acids are overexpressed in thecal and granulosa cells from polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 86:1318–1323. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Q, Wang G, Li Q, Jiang W, Kim JS, Wang R, Zhu S, Wang X, Yan L, Yi Y, et al: Polycomb group proteins EZH2 and EED directly regulate androgen receptor in advanced prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 145:415–426. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu J, Yu J, Mani RS, Cao Q, Brenner CJ, Cao X, Wang W, Wu L, Li J, Hu M, et al: An integrated network of androgen receptor, polycomb, and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions in prostate cancer progression. Cancer Cell. 17:443–454. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |