Open Access

Reduction of renal activity retention of radiolabeled albumin binding domain‑derived affinity proteins using a non‑residualizing label strategy compared with a cleavable glycine‑leucine‑glycine‑lysine‑linker

  • Authors:
    • Fanny Lundmark
    • Anzhelika Vorobyeva
    • Yongsheng Liu
    • Sarah Lindbo
    • Tianqi Xu
    • Maryam Oroujeni
    • Sara S. Rinne
    • Ulrika Rosenström
    • Javad Garousi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 28, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2023.13155
  • Article Number: 32
  • Copyright: © Lundmark et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The feasibility of targeted imaging and therapy using radiolabeled albumin‑binding domain‑derived affinity proteins (ADAPTs) has been demonstrated. However, high renal uptake of radioactivity limits the maximum tolerated dose. Successful reduction of renal retention of radiolabeled Fab fragments has been demonstrated by incorporating a cleavable linker between the targeting agent and the radiometal chelator. The present study investigated if the introduction of a glycine‑leucine‑glycine‑lysine (GLGK)‑linker would reduce the kidney uptake of radiolabeled ADAPT6 and also compared it with the non‑residualizing [125I]I‑[(4‑hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]maleimide ([125I]I‑HPEM) labeling strategy. GLGK was site‑specifically coupled to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‑targeting ADAPT6. Conjugates without the cleavable linker were used as controls and all constructs were labeled with lutetium‑177 (177Lu). [125I]I‑HPEM was coupled to ADAPT6 at the C‑terminus. Biodistribution of all constructs was evaluated in NMRI mice 4 h after injection. Specific binding to HER2‑expressing cells in vitro was demonstrated for all constructs. No significant difference in kidney uptake was observed between the [177Lu]Lu‑2,2',2”,2”'‑(1,4,7,10‑tetraazacyclododecane‑1,4,7,10‑tetrayl)tetraacetic acid‑GLGK‑conjugates and the controls. The renal activity of [125I]I‑HPEM‑ADAPT6 was significantly lower compared with all other constructs. In conclusion, the incorporation of the cleavable GLGK‑linker did not result in lower renal retention. Therefore, the present study emphasized that, in order to achieve a reduction of renal retention, alternative molecular design strategies may be required for different targeting agents.

Introduction

Targeted therapies have gained interest as a way for safe and selective delivery of cytotoxic agents, such as radionuclides, toxins, and drugs, to malignant cells (1). The use of high affinity small engineered scaffold proteins (ESPs) as targeting agents enables the efficient delivery of payloads to targets such as cancer-specific markers on tumor cells. Compared with antibodies, ESPs have a more rapid clearance from blood and non-targeted tissues (24). Radiolabeled affibody molecules and Albumin binding domain (ABD)-Derived Affinity ProTeins (ADAPTs) are ESPs that can provide high contrast visualization of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-expressing tumors in breast cancer patients (57). During the past years, several other promising ESPs, such as anticalins, cystine-knot peptides, and designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins), have been developed and investigated in preclinical or early clinical studies (812).

ADAPTs are small (5 kDa) engineered non-immunoglobulin proteins, with the selected variant against HER2 named ADAPT6 (13). In previous studies, we have investigated different aspects of the molecular design of radiolabeled ADAPTs to increase the sensitivity for imaging of disseminated cancers (1419). For stratification of cancer patients for HER2 targeting therapy, [99mTc]Tc-ADAPT6 has demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity as an imaging agent using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Moreover, no signs of acute toxicity in patients at doses up to 1 mg were observed (6). ADAPTs have also shown promising potential as therapeutic agents. ABD-fused ADAPT6 labeled with 177Lu has shown promising results in radionuclide therapy of HER2-expressing SKOV-3 ×enografts in mice. It was demonstrated that the median survival in mice was increased more than two-fold after a single injection of 18 MBq of [177Lu]Lu-2,2′,2”,2”'-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-ADAPT6-ABD035 (20).

The kidneys are the main excretion pathway of peptides and proteins below 60 kDa and therefore, a high renal uptake is common for ESP-based radiopharmaceuticals. High renal uptake leads to reduced sensitivity for detection of abdominal lesions close to the kidneys and it also decreases the maximum tolerated therapeutic dose. Radiopharmaceuticals excreted via the glomeruli undergo reabsorption and internalization in proximal tubular cells. Internalized radiopharmaceuticals are degraded by lysosomal enzymes leading to the formation of radiometabolites. The main reason for the high retention of radioactivity in kidneys is due to the degradation of proteins labeled with residualizing radiometals (e.g. 177Lu) leading to the formation of hydrophilic radiometabolites that cannot cross the cellular membrane and will therefore be trapped inside the cells. High renal retention has been observed for ADAPTs labeled with radiometals regardless of the label position, at both N- and C-terminus (13,16,17).

Several strategies have been developed to reduce the renal retention of ESP-based radiopharmaceuticals, and one strategy is to prevent glomerular filtration by fusing the radiopharmaceutical to an ABD. The ABD will bind to albumin in the blood which will increase the total size of the construct above the kidney filtration barrier (60 kDa). This strategy has been successfully applied to both 177Lu-labeled anti-HER2 affibody molecules and [177Lu]Lu-ADAPT6, where the kidney radioactivity retention was reduced 25- and 14-fold compared with the native constructs, respectively (20,21). However, the increased circulatory half-life by ABD-fusion will also increase the risk of undesired bone marrow exposure. Therefore, exploring alternative strategies to reduce the kidney accumulation of ADAPTs is of high interest for radionuclide therapy. Pretargeting is a possible approach to reduce the renal activity uptake using a non-labeled primary agent coupled to a recognition tag injected prior to the radiolabeled probe (2224). A study using affibody-based peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated pretargeting in mice demonstrated a 20-fold lower uptake of radioactivity in kidneys compared with the regular targeting strategy (24).

Another method that does not require modification of the ESP is the use of a pharmacological agent as a competitor or inhibitor of the reabsorption process in kidneys. These agents may act on transporters (e.g. saturation by lysine, arginine, gelofusine, or blocking by probenecid) or by decreasing the level of energy-mediated endocytosis (e.g. pre-injection of sodium maleate and fructose) (25). We have recently investigated these pharmacological approaches for renal uptake reduction of DARPins, affibodies, and ADAPT6. It was shown that sodium maleate and fructose could reduce the accumulation of activity in kidneys, however, both agents are toxic at the required doses (2628).

An alternative approach for reducing the activity uptake in the kidneys is the use of a non-residualizing label (e.g. radioiodine). Radiometabolites of a non-residualizing label are lipophilic which enables diffusion through the cell membrane out into the extracellular space. In that way, the radiometabolites can return to the blood circulation and be excreted from the body. Reduction of the renal activity retention using a non-residualizing label has been demonstrated for [125I]I-HPEM-ADAPT6 in mice bearing SKOV-3 ×enografts (17). This approach is particularly useful for radionuclide therapy with the β-emitter 131I. 131I has suitable physicochemical properties and the emitted 365 keV gamma-rays (81% abundance) could be used for monitoring therapy. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that ADAPT6 labeled with radiometals provided higher radioactivity retention in the tumor com-pared to a non-residualizing radiohalogen label (14). Longer retention of radioactivity at the target location reduces the frequency of injections for radionuclide therapy. Therefore, it is of high interest to find a strategy to reduce the reabsorption in the kidneys of ADAPTs labeled with radiometals (e.g. beta-emitting 177Lu).

The introduction of an enzyme-cleavable peptide linker between the radiometal-chelator complex and the scaffold protein could be another method for reducing the renal reabsorption of radiopharmaceuticals. Once the peptide linker has been cleaved by the enzyme located in the kidneys, the radiometal-chelator complex will be separated from the scaffold protein and excreted with the urine. It is crucial that the peptide linker has high selectivity to the selected enzyme and not to other enzymes (e.g. in the blood). The proximal tubular brush border enzyme is a potential target enzyme for this approach. Previous studies have shown that the glycine-lysine (GK) sequence is a substrate for carboxypeptidase M located at the renal brush border membrane (2931). Uehara et al also demonstrated that the construct 188Re-tricarbonyl-(cyclopentadienyl)-glycyl-lysine-Fab was recognized and cleaved by the brush border enzymes, resulting in a significant decrease of renal activity uptake 6 h after injection without influencing the tumor uptake (32). Another study demonstrated the same activity uptake in the tumor but a lower renal activity uptake due to an efficient cleavage of 66/67Ga-NOTA-Met from a 66/67Ga-labeled Fab fragment (33,34).

In this study, we investigated if the introduction of a cleavable glycine-leucine-glycine-lysine (GLGK) peptide linker between the [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-complex and ADAPT6 would reduce the renal activity retention due to cleavage by the brush border enzymes. This strategy was also compared to the use of a non-residualizing [125I]I-HPEM label.

Materials and methods

Preparation of radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs

Three constructs (13) of ADAPT6 (Fig. 1A), containing cysteine either at the N- or C-terminus, were recombinantly produced in E. coli BL21*(DE3) cells and purified as described earlier (13,14,17). The molecular mass was confirmed by MALDI. DOTA-GLGK(maleimide)-COOH was synthesized in two steps (Data S1). First, DOTA-GLGK-COOH (4) (Fig. 1B) was synthesized by Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis on 2-CTC resin using Oxyma Pure and N,N'-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) as coupling reagents and the cleaved peptide was purified by RP-HPLC. In a second step, N-(methoxycarbonyl) maleimide was coupled to the free amine in 4 to generate DOTA-GLGK(maleimide)-COOH (5) (Fig. 1B) which was purified by RP-HPLC. The identity and purity of the compound were determined by LC-MS. Through a Michael addition, constructs 1 and 2 were conjugated with compound 5 and DOTA-maleimide separately followed by purification by RP-HPLC. 177Lu-labeling was performed according to a method optimized by Altai et al (35). Construct 3 was labeled with [125I]I-HPEM according to the protocol optimized by Tolmachev et al for indirect iodination of affibody molecules (36).

The specificity of in vitro cell binding of radiolabeled ADAPT6

The specificity of binding of ADAPT6 constructs labeled with 177Lu or 125I was tested using the HER2-expressing SKOV3 ovarian cancer cell line (1.6×106 receptors/cell) as described by Wållberg and Orlova (37). Briefly, 50 nM of the labeled compound was added to two sets of Petri dishes in triplicates (1 million cells/dish). HER2 receptors in one set of the dishes were saturated by the addition of non-labeled ADAPT6 construct (1000-fold molar excess) 15 min prior to the addition of the labeled compound. The dishes were incubated at 37°C for 1 h in a humidified incubator. The media were aspirated, the cells were harvested by trypsinisation and radioactivity content in the samples was measured. The percent of cell-associated radioactivity was calculated and the data were normalized to the highest value of average cell-associated radioactivity.

In vivo studies

The animal experiments were planned in agreement with the Swedish laws on laboratory animal welfare and were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research in Uppsala (Permit Number C4/2016). The biodistribution properties of ADAPTs labeled with 177Lu or 125I were evaluated in non-tumor bearing NMRI mice, randomized into five groups with four animals per group. Mice were injected with a total dose of 3 µg per mouse (40 kBq/15 kBq of 177Lu/125I, correspondingly, and the dose was adjusted by the addition of non-labeled compound) in 100 µl PBS. At 4 h after injection, animals were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of xylazine and ketamine. The dose of xylazine was 20 mg/kg, the dose of ketamine was 200 mg/kg. After the injection of anesthesia, its effectiveness was ensured by the absence of a paw withdrawal reflex in mice. The sedated mice were euthanized by exsanguination via cardiac puncture and collection of blood. Tissue samples and organs of interest were collected, weighed, and the uptake of activity was measured using an automated γ-spectrometer. The data were corrected for dead time, spillover, background, and decay.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism (version 8.00 for Windows; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis. To determine significant differences (P<0.05) between two groups the obtained data were analyzed by an unpaired two-tailed t-test. Data analysis for more than two groups was performed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test.

Results

Synthesis of DOTA-GLGK(maleimide)-COOH (5)

DOTA-GLGK(maleimide)-COOH was successfully synthesized and purified. The purity was >98 % (Fig. S1) and the identity of the product was confirmed (calculated m/z 840.4, found m/z 840.1) by LC-MS (Fig. S2).

Preparation of radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs

ADAPT6 constructs were successfully produced and purified. MALDI-TOF analysis confirmed the expected mass of the constructs (6447 Da), which was in good agreement with the theoretical value (6445.2 Da). The difference was within the accuracy of the method. The constructs intended for labeling with 177Lu were successfully conjugated with construct 5 or DOTA-maleimide, and the purity and identity of the constructs were confirmed by mass spectrometry (Fig. S3). All ADAPT6 conjugates were successfully labeled with 177Lu or [125I]I-HPEM, and the radiochemical yields are presented in Table I. The purity after size-exclusion chromatography was over 99% for all constructs. No release of the radiolabels could be detected after incubation with an excess of EDTA or KI over 3 h (Table I). The radiolabeling of construct 3 (Fig. 1A) with [125I]I-HPEM was in good agreement with the previously reported data for indirect radioiodination of ADAPT6 and affibody molecules (17,37). The maximum achieved effective specific radioactivity was 1 MBq/µg (7 GBq/µmol) and 0.3 MBq/µg (1.96 GBq/µmol) for 177Lu and 125I, respectively.

Table I.

Radiochemical yields of radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs.

Table I.

Radiochemical yields of radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs.

ADAPT6 constructRadiochemical yield (%)Radiochemical purity (%)Radiochemical purity after challenge (%)
[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-GLGK-182±2>99>99a
[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-190±4>99>99a
[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-GLGK-287±3>99>99a
[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-295±2>99>99a
[125I]I-HPEM-360±6>99>99b

a Incubation with a 1000-fold molar excess of potassium iodide;

b Incubation with a 5000-fold molar excess of EDTA. As shown in Fig. 1A, construct 1: ADAPT6 with a cysteine at the N-terminus; 2: ADAPT6 with a cysteine at the C-terminus; 3: ADAPT6 with HPEM at C-terminus. ADAPT, albumin-binding domain-derived affinity proteins; 177Lu, lutetium-177; DOTA, 2,2′,2”,2”'-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid; [125I]I-HPEM, [125I]I-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]maleimide.

Specificity of in vitro cell binding of radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs

The in vitro specificity test demonstrated HER2-mediated binding to HER2-expressing SKOV-3 cells for all radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs (Fig. 2). Presaturation of HER2 receptors by non-labeled ADAPT6 resulted in a significant decrease of cell-associated radioactivity (P<0.001).

In vivo studies

The biodistribution study in NMRI mice 4 h after injection demonstrated a fast excretion and an activity in blood below 0.2% ID/g for all radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs (Fig. 3). Constructs labeled with 177Lu at the C-terminus had a significantly (P<0.001, one-way ANOVA test) lower activity uptake in blood compared to the N-terminus constructs. The liver uptake of [125I]I-HPEM-ADAPT6 was significantly higher (P<0.001, one-way ANOVA test) compared with the 177Lu-labeled constructs. For all constructs, the uptake of activity in non-targeted organs and tissues was lower than 1% ID/g (except in the kidneys for the 177Lu-labeled constructs). There was no significant difference (P>0.05, one-way ANOVA test) in the radioactivity uptake in the kidneys between the 177Lu-labeled ADAPT6 constructs containing the cleavable peptide linker and the controls, regardless of the label position. The renal radioactivity uptake of [125I]I-HPEM-ADAPT6 was significantly lower than that of all other constructs. For example, the renal activity of [125I]-HPEM-ADAPT6 was 507-fold lower than the activity of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-GLGK-2 (0.59±0.21% ID/g vs. 299±21% ID/g, respectively). Numerical biodistribution data is presented in Table SI.

Discussion

ESPs, such as ADAPTs, have a high affinity to their targets and possess suitable pharmacokinetics for selective delivery of radioactivity for imaging and therapy. However, due to their small size (<60 kDa), their biodistribution is associated with high renal uptake as a result of reabsorption in proximal tubular cells (57,13). After reabsorption, degradation of the radiopharmaceuticals occurs leading to the formation of radiometabolites. Radiometabolites of proteins labeled with radiometals (177Lu, 111In) usually have better residualizing properties than proteins labeled with radiohalogens (125I, 131I). The two most common ways to lower renal radioactivity exposure are to re-duce the uptake of the radiopharmaceutical in the kidneys or to reduce the renal retention of the radiometabolites. We have already demonstrated two different methods for the reduction of kidney uptake of radiolabeled ADAPTs. However, these methods are associated with toxicity in some organs and tissues such as the bone marrow (2028). Therefore, it is desirable to investigate other approaches for this purpose.

In this study, we have investigated if the strategy of incorporating a cleavable linker between the radiometal-chelator complex and the targeting agent would result in a reduction of renal activity retention, which has been demonstrated for Fab-fragments earlier (3234). The cleavable linker used in this study was GLGK, a substrate for the brush border enzymes in kidneys, which upon cleavage is suggested to lead to excretion of the radiometal-chelator complex with the urine. We also compared the use of a cleavable linker with another strategy based on the use of a non-residualizing label via indirect radiohalogenation. 177Lu and 125I (a surrogate of 131I used for therapy) were used as radionuclides to evaluate and compare the two strategies. Their preferable characteristics, such as a physical half-life between 6 and 7 days, stable daughter products, well-developed chemistry for radiolabeling with high stability, and association of an additional low energy gamma emission for diagnostic purposes make them suitable for radionuclide therapy in clinics (38).

After successful preparation of all ADAPT6 constructs, the two labeling approaches provided stable labels. All radiolabeled ADAPT6 constructs demonstrated specific binding to the HER2-expressing cells in vitro.

Surprisingly, no significant difference in renal activity retention could be demonstrated between the constructs containing the cleavable linkers and the controls. Despite the same structure of the cleavable linker as in the construct [111In]In-DOTA-GLGK-Cys-diabody used by Li and co-workers, there was no reduction in renal activity retention in our study (39). An explanation for this could be the differences in the type and size of the targeting agent, which could have negatively affected the cleavage of the linker. The different types of radionuclides used (177Lu vs. 111In) is also a factor that can influence the results. Arano et al demonstrated that the efficiency of this approach is influenced in different ways by the size and composition of the linker for different radionuclides and chelators (40). Based on this, the application of in vitro system using brush border membrane enzymes could be helpful for the selection of a suitable peptide linker for future studies (34,41).

While the presence and position of the cleavable linker did not affect the kidney uptake, results from the biodistribution study demonstrated that the uptake of radioactivity in blood was significantly lower for the C-terminus constructs than for the N-terminus constructs. An explanation for this could be that the placement of DOTA-GLGK(maleimide)-COOH at the C-terminus increases the local hydrophilicity at this position, which would decrease the interactions with blood proteins and thereby result in a lower blood uptake. In that way, these constructs would have a local hydrophilicity at both termini: the HEHEHE-tag at the N-terminus and the cleavable peptide linker at the C-terminus. The N-terminus construct will only have a local hydrophilicity at one terminus due to the placement of the HEHEHE-tag and the cleavable peptide linker at the same position. Higher local hydrophobicity at the C-terminus of these constructs could also be a possible explanation for the slightly, but not significantly, higher uptake in the liver.

When comparing the cleavable linker strategy with the use of a non-residualizing label, the renal retention of [125I]I-HPEM-ADAPT6 was significantly lower than for all the 177Lu-labeled constructs. This was an expected possibility as a non-residualizing iodine label is not trapped inside the cell after internalization to the same extent as a residualizing radiometal (17). Amongst the constructs studied herein, [125I]I-HPEM-ADAPT6 was deemed optimal due to its lower uptake in the kidneys. The use of a non-residualizing label resulted in significantly lower renal activity retention of radiolabeled ADAPT6 compared with the use of a residualizing radiometal in combination with the cleavable GLGK-linker.

It was previously observed that an elevated lipophilicity was associated with elevated hepatic uptake for affibody molecules and DARPins (4244). The addition of hydrophilic chelators such as DOTA increases the hydrophilicity of radiolabeled ADAPTs, while the addition of the HPEM group increases their lipophilicity. This might explain the observed phenomenon that the liver uptake of [125I]I-HPEM-ADAPT6 (0.70±0.19% ID/g) was ca. two to three times higher than of the 177Lu-labeled constructs (ca. 0.2–0.4% ID/g). It should be noted that the tumor uptake of ADAPT6 is typically much higher (ca. 10–20% ID/g; 17) and an elevated hepatic uptake would not be a limitation for radionuclide therapy

In conclusion, to prevent the kidneys from high radiation exposure in the course of targeted therapy, molecular design can be used to reduce renal activity retention. Earlier studies showed that the incorporation of a cleavable linker between the targeting agent and the radiometal chelator reduced renal retention of radiolabeled Fab fragments (3234). In the present study, we investigated if the same strategy could be applied to reduce the renal retention of radiolabeled ADATPs. Surprisingly, incorporation of the cleavable GLGK-linker did not result in lower renal retention of 177Lu-labeled ADAPT6. This study emphasizes that when aiming to reduce the renal retention of ESPs labeled with radiometals, the molecular design of each construct is crucial. However, further investigations into suitable methods for the reduction of renal activity uptake of radiolabeled ADAPTs during radionuclide therapy are needed.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data
Supporting Data

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Anna Orlova (Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden) and Mr. Jesper Borin (Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden) for their technical assistance.

Funding

This research was funded by the grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden; grant nos. 20 0181 P, 20 0893 Pj and 23 0650 JIA).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JG designed, coordinated and supervised the study. FL, AV, YL, SL, TX, MO, SSR and JG performed the experiments. JG analyzed the data. FL, SL and JG performed production, purification and analysis of compounds. UR participated in the molecular design and supervised the production, purification and analysis. FL, AV and JG wrote the first version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. FL and JG confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Authors' information

Fanny Lundmark, ORCID 0000-0002-9153-2832; Anzhelika Vorobyeva, ORCID 0000-0002-4778-3909; Yongsheng Liu, ORCID 0000-0001-5871-5779; Sarah Lindbo, ORCID 0000-0001-5908-4315; Tianqi Xu, ORCID 0000-0002-1826-4093; Maryam Oroujeni, ORCID 0000-0003-2660-9837; Sara S. Rinne, ORCID 0000-0003-2141-3982; Ulrika Rosenström, ORCID 0000-0002-0817-8140; Javad Garousi, ORCID 0000-0002-7224-6304.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

ADAPT

albumin-binding domain-derived affinity protein

ABD

albumin binding domain

DARPin

designed ankyrin repeat protein

DOTA

2,2′,2”,2”'-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid

EDTA

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

ESP

engineered scaffold protein

HER2

human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

HPEM

[(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]maleimide

SPECT

single-photon emission computed tomography

References

1 

Tolmachev VM, Chernov VI and Deyev SM: Targeted nuclear medicine. Seek and destroy. Russ Chem Rev. 91:RCR50342022. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Krasniqi A, D'Huyvetter M, Devoogdt N, Frejd FY, Sörensen J, Orlova A, Keyaerts M and Tolmachev V: Same-Day imaging using small proteins: Clinical experience and translational prospects in oncology. J Nucl Med. 59:885–891. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bragina OD, Deyev SM, Chernov VI and Tolmachev VM: The evolution of targeted radionuclide diagnosis of HER2-Positive breast cancer. Acta Naturae. 14:4–15. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Stern LA, Case BA and Hackel BJ: Alternative Non-Antibody protein scaffolds for molecular imaging of cancer. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2:10.1016/j.coche.2013.08.009. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Sörensen J, Velikyan I, Sandberg D, Wennborg A, Feldwisch J, Tolmachev V, Orlova A, Sandström M, Lubberink M, Olofsson H, et al: Measuring HER2-Receptor expression in metastatic breast cancer using [68Ga]ABY-025 affibody PET/CT. Theranostics. 6:262–271. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bragina O, von Witting E, Garousi J, Zelchan R, Sandström M, Medvedeva A, Orlova A, Doroshenko A, Vorobyeva A, Lindbo S, et al: Phase I Study of 99mTc-ADAPT6, a scaffold protein-based probe for visualization of HER2 expression in breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 62:493–499. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bragina O, Chernov V, Schulga A, Konovalova E, Hober S, Deyev S, Sörensen J and Tolmachev V: Direct intra-patient comparison of scaffold protein-based tracers, [99mTc]Tc-ADAPT6 and [99mTc]Tc-(HE)3-G3, for imaging of HER2-Positive breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 15:31492023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Rothe C and Skerra A: Anticalin® proteins as therapeutic agents in human diseases. BioDrugs. 32:233–243. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Ackerman SE, Currier NV, Bergen JM and Cochran JR: Cystine-knot peptides: Emerging tools for cancer imaging and therapy. Expert Rev Proteomics. 11:561–572. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Vorobyeva A, Schulga A, Konovalova E, Güler R, Löfblom J, Sandström M, Garousi J, Chernov V, Bragina O, Orlova A, et al: Optimal composition and position of histidine-containing tags improves biodistribution of 99mTc-labeled DARPin G3. Sci Rep. 9:94052019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Deyev SM, Vorobyeva A, Schulga A, Abouzayed A, Günther T, Garousi J, Konovalova E, Ding H, Gräslund T, Orlova A, et al: Effect of a radiolabel biochemical nature on tumor-targeting properties of EpCAM-binding engineered scaffold protein DARPin Ec1. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 145:216–225. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Bragina O, Chernov V, Schulga A, Konovalova E, Garbukov E, Vorobyeva A, Orlova A, Tashireva L, Sörensen J, Zelchan R, et al: Phase I Trial of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3, a DARPin-Based probe for imaging of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer. J Nucl Med. 63:528–535. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Garousi J, Lindbo S, Nilvebrant J, Åstrand M, Buijs J, Sandström M, Honarvar H, Orlova A, Tolmachev V and Hober S: ADAPT, a novel scaffold protein-based probe for radionuclide imaging of molecular targets that are expressed in disseminated cancers. Cancer Res. 75:4364–4371. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Garousi J, Lindbo S, Borin J, von Witting E, Vorobyeva A, Oroujeni M, Mitran B, Orlova A, Buijs J, Tolmachev V, et al: Comparative evaluation of dimeric and monomeric forms of ADAPT scaffold protein for targeting of HER2-expressing tumours. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 134:37–48. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Garousi J, Lindbo S, Mitran B, Buijs J, Vorobyeva A, Orlova A, Tolmachev V and Hober S: Comparative evaluation of tumor targeting using the anti-HER2 ADAPT scaffold protein labeled at the C-terminus with indium-111 or technetium-99m. Sci Rep. 7:147802017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lindbo S, Garousi J, Mitran B, Vorobyeva A, Oroujeni M, Orlova A, Hober S and Tolmachev V: Optimized molecular design of ADAPT-Based HER2-Imaging probes labeled with 111In and 68Ga. Mol Pharm. 15:2674–2683. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Lindbo S, Garousi J, Mitran B, Altai M, Buijs J, Orlova A, Hober S and Tolmachev V: Radionuclide tumor targeting using ADAPT scaffold proteins: Aspects of label positioning and residualizing properties of the label. J Nucl Med. 59:93–99. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

von Witting E, Garousi J, Lindbo S, Vorobyeva A, Altai M, Oroujeni M, Mitran B, Orlova A, Hober S and Tolmachev V: Selection of the optimal macrocyclic chelators for labeling with 111In and 68Ga improves contrast of HER2 imaging using engineered scaffold protein ADAPT6. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 140:109–120. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Lindbo S, Garousi J, Åstrand M, Honarvar H, Orlova A, Hober S and Tolmachev V: Influence of Histidine-Containing tags on the biodistribution of ADAPT scaffold proteins. Bioconjug Chem. 27:716–726. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Garousi J, von Witting E, Borin J, Vorobyeva A, Altai M, Vorontsova O, Konijnenberg MW, Oroujeni M, Orlova A, Tolmachev V, et al: Radionuclide therapy using ABD-fused ADAPT scaffold protein: Proof of Principle. Biomaterials. 266:1203812021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Tolmachev V, Orlova A, Pehrson R, Galli J, Baastrup B, Andersson K, Sandström M, Rosik D, Carlsson J, Lundqvist H, et al: Radionuclide therapy of HER2-positive microxenografts Using a 177Lu-Labeled HER2-Specific affibody molecule. Cancer Res. 67:2773–2782. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Goldenberg DM, Chatal JF, Barbet J, Boerman O and Sharkey RM: Cancer imaging and therapy with bispecific antibody pretargeting. Update Cancer Ther. 2:19–31. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Honarvar H, Westerlund K, Altai M, Sandström M, Orlova A, Tolmachev V and Karlström AE: Feasibility of affibody Molecule-Based PNA-Mediated radionuclide pretargeting of malignant tumors. Theranostics. 6:93–103. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Westerlund K, Altai M, Mitran B, Konijnenberg M, Oroujeni M, Atterby C, de Jong M, Orlova A, Mattsson J, Micke P, et al: Radionuclide therapy of HER2-Expressing human xenografts using Affibody-Based Peptide nucleic acid-mediated pretargeting: In Vivo proof of principle. J Nucl Med. 59:1092–1098. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Vegt E, de Jong M, Wetzels JFM, Masereeuw R, Melis M, Oyen WJG, Gotthardt M and Boerman OC: Renal toxicity of radiolabeled peptides and antibody fragments: Mechanisms, impact on radionuclide therapy, and strategies for prevention. J Nucl Med. 51:1049–1058. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Altai M, Garousi J, Rinne SS, Schulga A, Deyev S and Vorobyeva A: On the prevention of kidney uptake of radiolabeled DARPins. EJNMMI Res. 10:72020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Garousi J, Vorobyeva A and Altai M: Influence of several compounds and drugs on the renal uptake of radiolabeled affibody molecules. Molecules. 25:26732020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Vorobyeva A, Oroujeni M, Lindbo S, Hober S, Xu T, Liu Y, Rinne SS and Garousi J: Investigation of a pharmacological approach for reduction of renal uptake of radiolabeled ADAPT scaffold protein. Molecules. 25:44482020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Arano Y: Strategies to reduce renal radioactivity levels of antibody fragments. Q J Nucl Med. 42:262–270. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Arano Y, Fujioka Y, Akizawa H, Ono M, Uehara T, Wakisaka K, Nakayama M, Sakahara H, Konishi J and Saji H: Chemical design of radiolabeled antibody fragments for low renal radioactivity levels. Cancer Res. 59:128–134. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Fujioka Y, Arano Y, Ono M, Uehara T, Ogawa K, Namba S, Saga T, Nakamoto Y, Mukai T, Konishi J, et al: Renal metabolism of 3′-iodohippuryl N(epsilon)-maleoyl-L-lysine (HML)-conjugated Fab fragments. Bioconjug Chem. 12:178–185. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Uehara T, Koike M, Nakata H, Hanaoka H, Iida Y, Hashimoto K, Akizawa H, Endo K and Arano Y: Design, synthesis, and evaluation of [188Re]organorhenium-labeled antibody fragments with renal enzyme-cleavable linkage for low renal radioactivity levels. Bioconjug Chem. 18:190–198. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Uehara T, Yokoyama M, Suzuki H, Hanaoka H and Arano Y: A Gallium-67/68-Labeled antibody fragment for Immuno-SPECT/PET shows low renal radioactivity without loss of tumor uptake. Clin Cancer Res. 24:3309–3316. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Bendre S, Zhang Z, Kuo HT, Rousseau J, Zhang C, Merkens H, Roxin Á, Bénard F and Lin KS: Evaluation of Met-Val-Lys as a renal brush border Enzyme-Cleavable linker to reduce kidney uptake of 68Ga-Labeled DOTA-Conjugated peptides and peptidomimetics. Molecules. 25:38542020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Altai M, Westerlund K, Velletta J, Mitran B, Honarvar H and Karlström AE: Evaluation of affibody molecule-based PNA-mediated radionuclide pretargeting: Development of an optimized conjugation protocol and 177Lu labeling. Nucl Med Biol. 54:1–9. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Tolmachev V, Mume E, Sjöberg S, Frejd FY and Orlova A: Influence of valency and labelling chemistry on in vivo targeting using radioiodinated HER2-binding Affibody molecules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 36:692–701. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Wållberg H and Orlova A: Slow internalization of anti-HER2 synthetic affibody monomer 111In-DOTA-ZHER2:342-pep2: Implications for development of labeled tracers. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 23:435–442. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Yeong CH, Cheng M and Ng KH: Therapeutic radionuclides in nuclear medicine: current and future prospects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 15:845–863. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Li L, Olafsen T, Anderson AL, Wu A, Raubitschek AA and Shively JE: Reduction of kidney uptake in radiometal labeled peptide linkers conjugated to recombinant antibody fragments. Site-specific conjugation of DOTA-peptides to a Cys-diabody. Bioconjug Chem. 13:985–995. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Arano Y: Renal brush border strategy: A developing procedure to reduce renal radioactivity levels of radiolabeled polypeptides. Nucl Med Biol. 92:149–155. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Biber J, Stieger B, Stange G and Murer H: Isolation of renal proximal tubular brush-border membranes. Nat Protoc. 2:1356–1359. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Hosseinimehr SJ, Tolmachev V and Orlova A: Liver uptake of radiolabeled targeting proteins and peptides: Considerations for targeting peptide conjugate design. Drug Discov Today. 17:1224–1232. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Hofstrom C, Orlova A, Altai M, Wangsell F, Graslund T and Tolmachev V: Use of a HEHEHE purification tag instead of a hexahistidine tag improves biodistribution of affibody molecules site-specifically labeled with (99m)Tc, (111)In, and (125)I. J Med Chem. 54:3817–3826. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Vorobyeva A, Sсhulga A, Konovalova E, Güler R, Mitran B, Garousi J, Rinne S, Löfblom J, Orlova A, Deyev S and Tolmachev V: Comparison of tumor-targeting properties of directly and indirectly radioiodinated designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) G3 variants for molecular imaging of HER2. Int J Oncol. 54:1209–1220. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2024
Volume 29 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lundmark F, Vorobyeva A, Liu Y, Lindbo S, Xu T, Oroujeni M, Rinne SS, Rosenström U and Garousi J: Reduction of renal activity retention of radiolabeled albumin binding domain‑derived affinity proteins using a non‑residualizing label strategy compared with a cleavable glycine‑leucine‑glycine‑lysine‑linker. Mol Med Rep 29: 32, 2024.
APA
Lundmark, F., Vorobyeva, A., Liu, Y., Lindbo, S., Xu, T., Oroujeni, M. ... Garousi, J. (2024). Reduction of renal activity retention of radiolabeled albumin binding domain‑derived affinity proteins using a non‑residualizing label strategy compared with a cleavable glycine‑leucine‑glycine‑lysine‑linker. Molecular Medicine Reports, 29, 32. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2023.13155
MLA
Lundmark, F., Vorobyeva, A., Liu, Y., Lindbo, S., Xu, T., Oroujeni, M., Rinne, S. S., Rosenström, U., Garousi, J."Reduction of renal activity retention of radiolabeled albumin binding domain‑derived affinity proteins using a non‑residualizing label strategy compared with a cleavable glycine‑leucine‑glycine‑lysine‑linker". Molecular Medicine Reports 29.2 (2024): 32.
Chicago
Lundmark, F., Vorobyeva, A., Liu, Y., Lindbo, S., Xu, T., Oroujeni, M., Rinne, S. S., Rosenström, U., Garousi, J."Reduction of renal activity retention of radiolabeled albumin binding domain‑derived affinity proteins using a non‑residualizing label strategy compared with a cleavable glycine‑leucine‑glycine‑lysine‑linker". Molecular Medicine Reports 29, no. 2 (2024): 32. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2023.13155