Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin immunoexpression in colorectal carcinoma: A stage-specific prognostic factor?

  • Authors:
    • Valeria Barresi
    • Roberta Lucianò
    • Enrica Vitarelli
    • Agata Labate
    • Giovanni Tuccari
    • Gaetano Barresi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 23, 2010     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2010.191
  • Pages: 1089-1096
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

TNM post-surgical staging is considered to be one of the most powerful prognosticators for colorectal carcinoma. Although patient survival mostly decreases concomitantly to stage increase, in a percentage of cases TNM stage appears only to express the anatomic extent of the neoplasia with no correlation with clinical outcome. Thus, the identification of additional prognostic markers for colorectal cancer is required. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a 25-kDa protein that appears to play an important role in colorectal cancer progression. In order to evaluate whether NGAL expression may be considered as a predictor of colorectal cancer progression, we analyzed its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics, as well as with patient progression-free survival in a series of surgically resected colorectal carcinomas. A variable NGAL immunoexpression was found in 24 out of the 64 analyzed cases. When only the positive cases were considered, a significant association was found between a high NGAL expression and the presence of distant metastases or high tumor stage. In addition, the presence of NGAL was a significant negative prognostic marker correlated with a shorter progression-free survival in stage I colorectal carcinoma, but not in the remaining TNM stages. If our findings are confirmed in more extensive analyses on stage I colorectal carcinoma, NGAL assessment may be used in order to select those patients with a higher progression risk and to submit them to adjuvant therapies useful to prevent adverse outcome.

Introduction

Colorectal carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in Western Europe and the US (1). Post-surgical TNM staging is a prognostic factor that is able to predict the clinical course of this neoplasia, with 5-year survival rates decreasing concomitantly to stage (2,3). For this reason, TNM staging is taken into consideration in the therapeutic protocols applied to colorectal cancer patients. Thus, stage I colorectal carcinoma is treated by surgery alone, with adjuvant chemotherapy being the choice of treatment in order to improve the survival of patients affected by higher stage carcinomas. Nevertheless, in certain instances TNM staging appears only to express the anatomic extent of the neoplasia with no evidence of correlation with patient survival (4). At present, histoprognostic factors able to predict progression-free and overall survival of colorectal cancer in order to select patients for adjuvant therapies are not available. Thus, factors predicting progression risk, in addition to the currently used clinicalpathological staging system, are required.

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is also known as NRL (neu-related lipocalin), oncogene 24p3, uterocalin and lipocalin 2. It is a 25-kDa protein that is stored in the granules of human neutrophils (5). Additionally, it belongs to the lipocalin family which consists of more than 50 members, all of which are characterized by the ability to bind and transport small lipophilic substances (6). NGAL was shown to be involved in iron trafficking (7) and to increase the cytoplasmic levels of this mineral (8) by capturing and transporting the iron particles to the inner cell following interaction with specific membrane receptors (24p3, megalin). Its role in the delivery of iron to the cells underlies the multiple effects attributed to NGAL. Since it is released by activated neutrophils, this protein is involved in the iron depletion strategy exploited in immune defense against bacterial pathogens (9). Furthermore, NGAL appears to be involved in the growth, development and differentiation of a number of human tissues, as early as in the embryo, via its regulation of iron-responsive genes which are crucial in the differentiation of primordial cells (10,11).

Since NGAL synthesis is induced by factors promoting the development of neoplasias (6,11,12), it was suggested that this protein plays a role in the carcinogenesis and progression of human tumors (11). Accordingly, its overexpression has been found in various types of cancer, including colorectal (1316). The role of NGAL in colorectal cancer progression (18) is evident due to the existence of a significant association between a high NGAL mRNA quantity and nodal metastases or advanced stage of this neoplasia (17). In addition, the induction of NGAL overexpression has been shown to decrease cell-cell adhesion, enhance cell-matrix attachment and increase cell motility and in vitro invasion in colorectal cancer cell lines (18). Subsequently, this study aimed to evaluate whether progression-free survival may differ on the basis of NGAL expression in colorectal cancer and whether this expression is a predictor of disease progression in this neoplasia.

Materials and methods

Materials

A total of 64 consecutive cases of surgically resected colorectal carcinomas, procured from an equal number of patients (29 female and 35 male patients; age range 36–89 years; mean age 68.09±12.19), were obtained from the files of the Department of Human Pathology of the University of Messina, Italy. None of the patients had received pre-operative chemotherapy for their neoplasia or had colonic carcinoma in situ. Complete tumor resection had been achieved in all cases (R0). A total of 41 cases were located at the left colon (including rectum and sigma), while 23 were located at the right colon (including caecum, ascendant and transversus). Histological grade was established according to the World Health Organization classification system criteria; specifically, 24 cases were grade 1, 36 grade 2, while 4 cases were grade 3. Of all patients at the time of diagnosis, 20 had lymph nodes and 12 had liver metastases, with 5 of the latter being submitted to surgical resection for their metastases. Follow-up data, including information regarding progression-free survival, were available in all 64 cases. None of the patients with stage I cancer had been treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, while 3 out of 11 patients with stage II colorectal cancer had received chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid) as had all the patients with stage III or IV cancers.

Methods

All 64 cases were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. For each case, 4-μm sections were cut from the corresponding paraffin block for subsequent immunohistochemical study.

Briefly, the endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.1% H2O2 in methanol for 20 min. Normal sheep serum was then applied for 30 min to prevent non-specific adherence of serum proteins. Sections were sequentially incubated at 4°C overnight with the primary antibody against NGAL (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; 1:100). The bound primary antibody was visualized using the Dako EnVision peroxidase detection system (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For immunostaining, the sections were incubated in the dark for 10 min with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetra hydrochloride (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), with the amount of 100 mg in 200 ml 0.03% hydrogen peroxide in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Nuclear counterstaining was performed by Mayer’s haemalum. The binding specificity was assessed by omitting the primary antiserum or replacing it with normal rabbit serum or PBS (pH 7.4). Proximal tubules within samples of normal renal parenchyma were used as positive controls for the immunoreactions (15,19).

Assessment of the immunostained section was performed by two independent pathologists, who were blinded to the clinicopathological data. NGAL expression was based on the presence of cytoplasmic and membranous staining. The intensity of staining (IS) was graded as negative (0), weak (1), moderate (2) and strong (3). The area of staining positivity (ASP), recorded as a percentage of neoplastic positive cells, was assessed using the values: 0 (<10%), 1 (11–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%) and 4 (>75%), according to the procedure previously described (16,21). An intensity distribution (ID) score was then generated for each case by multiplying the values of IS and ASP. Cases with an ID score of 0 were considered to be negative for NGAL.

For the statistical analyses, samples were subdivided into negative and positive tumors, according to the median NGAL ID score, which was 0. Moreover, when only positive cases were considered, low (ID score 1–2) and high (ID score >2) NGAL expression was defined on the basis of the median ID score of this subgroup (median ID score 2).

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact and Chi-square tests were performed to assess the statistical correlations between NGAL expression and various clinicopathological characteristics, such as age, gender or the site, histological grade, depth of infiltration (T), presence of nodal (N) or distant metastases (M), as well as tumor stage.

Progression-free survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, with the date of primary surgery as the entry data. The end point was characterized as the length of survival to recurrent (local or distant) disease. The Mantel-Cox log-rank test was applied to assess the strength of association between survival time and each of the patient characteristics (age, gender, chemotherapeutic treatment, site, histological grade, TNM stage and NGAL immunoexpression of the tumor) as a single variable. Concomitantly, a multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) was utilised to determine the independent effect of each significant variable.

P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data were analysed using the SPSS package version 6.1.3 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Table I shows the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical data related to the 64 analyzed colorectal carcinomas. NGAL immunoexpression was found in 24 cases with variable ID scores. Immunostaining was present within the cytoplasm of the neoplastic cells (Fig. 1), whereas no immunolabelling was evident in the normal epithelium adjacent to the tumor. In addition, in positive cases immunoreactivity was always evident at the invasive front of the neoplasm.

Table I

Clinico-pathological characteristics and NGAL immunohistochemical expression in 64 colorectal carcinomas.

Table I

Clinico-pathological characteristics and NGAL immunohistochemical expression in 64 colorectal carcinomas.

CaseAgeGenderSiteGradeTNMStageNGAL ID scoreRecurrenceProgression-free survivalChemotherapy
163MLeft colon320010None106None
276FRight colon220010None105None
386FLeft colon110011None62None
462MLeft colon120010None96None
558MLeft colon120010None116None
671MRight colon120010None88None
755MLeft colon220010None74None
875MRight colon220010None86None
962MRight colon220010None65None
1079FLeft colon220010None78None
1183FRight colon220010None75None
1261FLeft colon220010None61None
1362MLeft colon220012None89None
1476FLeft colon220010None90None
1564FLeft colon220012None90None
1670MLeft colon220010None82None
1779MLeft colon220010None93None
1863FRight colon320010None77None
1974MRight colon220010None98None
2085FLeft colon220010None65None
2153FRight colon220011None110None
2265MLeft colon220010None106None
2386MRight colon210010None112None
2469MLeft colon220010None117None
2566FRight colon120011Distant48None
2689FRight colon120012Distant30None
2771FRight colon220011Distant32None
2872MLeft colon220010None106None
2947MRight colon330024Distant22None
3071MRight colon240020None84Yes
3181FRight colon230020None44None
3265MLeft colon240022Local54None
3376MLeft colon330020Distant32None
3437FLeft colon140020None61Yes
3554FLeft colon240021Distant20Yes
3686MLeft colon230020Distant10None
3752FLeft colon230021None60None
3882MLeft colon230020Distant10None
3976MLeft colon230024None35None
4064MRight colon131030Distant30Yes
4171FLeft colon221030Distant12Yes
4288FLeft colon131034Distant46Yes
4371MRight colon231030Distant58Yes
4463FLeft colon231032None26Yes
4581FRight colon121031Distant34Yes
4636FLeft colon141030None61Yes
4773MLeft colon141031None76Yes
4868FLeft colon131030None95Yes
4975MLeft colon341030Distant20Yes
5046FRight colon221032Distant14Yes
5180MLeft colon221031None78Yes
5275MLeft colon241030Distant36Yes
5361MRight colon141142Distant25Yes
5477MLeft colon130140Distant36Yes
5550FLeft colon141140Distant24Yes
5663FLeft colon240141Distant4Yes
5773MRight colon231140Distant14Yes
5878FLeft colon240144None61Yes
5971FLeft colon231141Distant29Yes
6062MLeft colon221143None106Yes
6168MLeft colon231140None80Yes
6242FLeft colon240140None104Yes
6360MRight colon341140None76Yes
6460MRight colon120148Distant40Yes

[i] ID, intensity distribution; M, male; F, female; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

No significant associations were found between NGAL presence and the various clinicopathological characteristics (Table II), but when only positive cases were examined, a significant association emerged between a high NGAL expression (ID score >2) and the presence of distant metastases at the initial diagnosis (P=0.017) or high TNM stage (P=0.039) (Table III).

Table II

Statistical correlations between the NGAL immuno-expression and the various clinicopathological characteristics in 24 NGAL-positive colorectal carcinomas.

Table II

Statistical correlations between the NGAL immuno-expression and the various clinicopathological characteristics in 24 NGAL-positive colorectal carcinomas.

NGAL ID score

1–2>2P-value
Gender0.192
 M64
 F122
Age0.665
 <70 years113
 >70 years73
Site1.000
 Left colon114
 Right colon72
Grade0.201
 162
 2123
 301
T0.418
 110
 292
 333
 451
N1.000
 0114
 1–272
M0.017
 0162
 124
Stage0.039
 170
 231
 361
 424

[i] ID, intensity distribution; M, male; F, female; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Table III

Statistical correlations between NGAL immuno-expression and the various clinicopathological characteristics of the 64 analyzed colorectal carcinomas.a

Table III

Statistical correlations between NGAL immuno-expression and the various clinicopathological characteristics of the 64 analyzed colorectal carcinomas.a

NGAL ID score

0>0P-value
Gender0.066
 M2710
 F1314
Age0.438
 <70 years1814
 >70 years2210
Site1.000
 Left colon2615
 Right colon149
Grade0.055
 198
 2265
 351
T0.932
 111
 22111
 3106
 486
N0.419
 02915
 1–2119
M1.000
 03018
 1106
Stage0.201
 1217
 244
 357
 4106

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-ol-01-06-1089'] } ID, intensity distribution; M, male; F, female; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

a Fisher’s exact and Chi-square tests were used.

Post-surgical follow-up ranged between 4 and 117 months. During the follow-up, 24 out of 64 patients developed recurrent disease, with distant metastases in 23 cases and local recurrence in 1 case. Patients who died of independent disease and those with no evidence of disease progression (3/64) were censored. A total of 23 out of 24 patients with recurrent disease died of disease progression. Univariate survival analyses revealed TNM stage, depth of infiltration, nodal metastases, chemotherapy and NGAL immunoexpression to be significant prognostic factors for progression-free survival (Table IV). In particular, the length of survival to recurrent disease was significantly shorter in those patients with a colorectal carcinoma characterized by a high NGAL expression (P=0.0305) (Table IV). Nevertheless, the multivariate analysis suggested that NGAL expression was not an independent prognostic factor, whereas the application of chemotherapy was found to be an independent variable as compared to progression-free survival of patients (Table IV). When the prognostic value of NGAL expression was specifically investigated according to the TNM stage, the expression of this protein was evidenced as a negative prognostic factor that correlated with a shorter progression-free survival in stage I (P=0.001) (Fig. 2), but not in colorectal carcinomas of higher stages (Table V).

Table IV

Univariate and multivariate analyses for progression-free survival in 64 patients affected by colorectal carcinoma.

Table IV

Univariate and multivariate analyses for progression-free survival in 64 patients affected by colorectal carcinoma.

A, Univariate analysis.

Charateristicsχ2DfP-value
Age0.986210.3207
Gender010.9935
Site1.159510.2816
Grade2.258020.3234
T9.126030.0088
N7.320510.0068
M3.309310.0689
Stage16.252330.0010
Chemotherapy8.821010.0030
NGAL immunoexpression4.679510.0305

B, Multivariate analysis.

VariableβSEExp (β)P-value
Chemotherapy1.21160.434830.005

[i] df, degrees of freedom; SE, standard error.

Table V

NGAL univariate analysis for progression-free survival according to TNM staging of 64 colorectal carcinomas.

Table V

NGAL univariate analysis for progression-free survival according to TNM staging of 64 colorectal carcinomas.

Univariate analysis (Characteristic: NGAL expression)χ2DfP-value
Stage
 I10.577510.0011
 II0.007910.9290
 III0.240010.6242
 IV0.181110.6704

[i] Df, degrees of freedom; TNM, tumor node metastasis.

Discussion

NGAL overexpression and correlation with disease progression has been shown in malignancies of the gastro-intestinal tract, including esophageal, gastric and colorectal carcinomas (17,21,22). We investigated for the first time the relationship between NGAL prognostic value and progression-free survival of colorectal carcinoma. In particular, NGAL immunohistochemical expression was evaluated in a series of 64 colorectal carcinomas of different stages and correlated with the various clinicopathological characteristics, as well as with progression-free survival of the patients.

A variable NGAL expression was found in 24 out of 64 cases. In accordance with previous reports (1618), NGAL immunoexpression was found in the neoplastic cells of positive cases, but not in the adjacent normal epithelium, in line with its suggestive role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Immunostaining was localized at the cytoplasm of the neoplastic cells, as in the case of breast cancer (13). This localization suggests NGAL internalization to the inner cell following its binding to membrane receptors. Since NGAL is involved in iron uptake, we hypothesize that NGAL expression and cytoplasmic localization reflect augmented iron requirement by the neoplastic elements of colorectal carcinoma, as previously described (18). Notably, NGAL appears to play a role in carcinogenesis by promoting iron uptake from the extracellular space within the malignant cells, a fundamental process for the maintenance of neoplastic cell multiplication (14,23). Besides, it is well-known that iron overload promotes carcinogenesis through the induction of oxidative DNA damage (24), whereas iron depletion leads to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (25).

Notably, NGAL staining was mainly observed in the invasive front of the tumor in positive cases. This may be related to its ability to increase the invasive potential of tumor cells. Studies have shown that NGAL forms a complex with matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), preventing MMP-9 degradation and resulting in increased MMP-9 enzyme activity in vitro (26). MMP-9 plays a role in cancer progression by degrading the molecular components of the basement membrane and extracellular matrix, releasing vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) from the extracellular matrix, and enabling angiogenesis, invasion and distant metastasis (2628). Thus, NGAL may play a role in cancer progression by causing increased MMP-9 enzymatic activity, thereby promoting the invasive and metastatic potential of cancer cells in vivo and in vitro (28). However, NGAL was recently shown to increase invasiveness of colorectal cancer cells through an MMP-9-independent process (18). It has been shown that NGAL overexpression enhances the invasive and metastatic potential of colon cancer cells by decreasing e-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion through an iron-dependent mechanism (18). In contrast to other authors (17), we failed to demonstrate any significant correlation between NGAL and the depth of infiltration of tumors. Nevertheless, the role of NGAL in the invasiveness of colorectal carcinoma was confirmed by a significant association between a high NGAL expression and the presence of distant metastases or a high TNM stage at the time of initial diagnosis of the analyzed colorectal carcinomas. Notably, NGAL involvement in the development of metastases had previously been hypothesized, since inhibition of this protein results in the blockage of lung metastases from breast carcinoma (29).

NGAL overexpression was previously considered to be a negative prognostic factor in colorectal cancer due to its significant association with the presence of adverse factors, such as lymph node metastases or venous invasion (17). However, its impact on specific survival in relation to neoplasia has yet to be investigated. Our results showed that patients with tumors characterized by NGAL immunohistochemical expression exhibited a significantly shorter progression-free survival in comparison to patients with absent NGAL staining. Thus, NGAL appears to act as a negative prognostic factor for colorectal cancer, as in the case of breast cancer (13). Notably, when the relationship between NGAL predictive value and disease-progression risk was evaluated according to the TNM stage of neoplasias, the presence of NGAL appeared to be a significant predictor of progression risk in stage I colorectal carcinoma, but not in the remaining TNM stages. Only the former group of patients had not been submitted to chemotherapy, which emerged as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival in our cohort.

In conclusion, the present study showed that NGAL immunoexpression is a negative prognostic marker associated with shorter disease-specific survival in stage I colorectal carcinomas. If our findings are confirmed on larger cohorts of stage I colorectal carcinomas, NGAL assessment in colon cancer tissue may be used as a prognostic tool to determine tumors with a higher progression risk, so that selected patients may undergo adjuvant treatments in order to prevent adverse outcome. Moreover, the inhibition of NGAL expression or function may represent the target for novel therapeutic strategies in order to prevent disease progression in NGAL-positive colorectal carcinomas. Colorectal carcinomas showing NGAL expression may benefit from therapies with iron chelators as anti-cancer agents. Notably, since iron deprivation caused by iron chelators inhibits cell proliferation, iron and its corresponding transport proteins have become new targets in cancer therapy (30,31). Finally, since the efficacy of anti-NGAL antibodies has been shown by blocking cancer metastasis in mice (29), NGAL expression and involvement in colorectal cancer progression and metastatic disease may be exploited for such novel anti-cancer therapies.

References

1 

Landis H, Murray T, Bolden S and Wingo PA: Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin. 49:8–31. 1999.

2 

Wiggers T, Arends JW, Schutter B, Volovics L and Bosman FT: A multivariate analysis of pathologic prognostic indicators in large bowel cancer. Cancer. 61:386–389. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Wu XC, Chen VW, Steele B, Ruiz B, Fulton J, Liu L, Carozza SE and Greenlee R: Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender, and age group. Cancer. 92:2547–2554. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Di Gregorio C, Benfatti P, Losi L, Roncucci L, Rossi G, Ponti G, Marino M, Pedroni M, Scarselli A, Roncari B and Ponz de Leon M: Incidence and survival of patients with Dukes’ A (stages T1 and T2) colorectal carcinoma: a 15-year population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 20:147–154. 2005.

5 

Cowland JB and Borregaard N: Molecular characterization and pattern of tissue expression of the gene for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin from humans. Genomics. 45:17–23. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bratt T: Lipocalins and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1482:318–326. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Yang J, Goetz D, Li JY, Wang W, Mori K and Setlik D: An iron delivery pathway mediated by a lipocalin. Mol Cell. 10:1045–1056. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Goetz DH, Willie ST, Arme RS, Bratt T, Borregaard N and Strong RK: Ligand preference inferred from the structure of neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin. Biochemistry. 39:1935–1941. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Goetz DH, Holmes MA, Borregaard N, Bluhm ME, Raymond KN and Strong RK: The neutrophil lipocalin NGAL is a bacteriostatic agent that interferes with siderophore-mediated iron acquisition. Mol Cell. 10:1033–1043. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Gwira JA, Wei F, Ishibe S, Ueland JM, Barasch J and Cantley LG: Expression of neutrophil associated-gelatinase lipocalin regulates epithelial morphogenesis in vitro. J Biol Chem. 280:7875–7882. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Bolignano D, Donato V, Lacquaniti A, et al: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in human neoplasias: a new protein enters the scene. Cancer Lett. 288:10–16. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Hannai J, Mammoto T, Seth P, Mori K, Karumanchi SA, Barasch J and Sukhatme VP: Lipocalin 2 diminishes invasiveness and metastasis of Ras-transformed cells. J Biol Chem. 280:3641–3647. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Bauer M, Eickhoff JC, Gould MN, Mundhenke C, Maas N and Friedl A: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a predictor of poor prognosis in human primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 108:389–397. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Iannetti A, Pacifico F, Acquaviva R, et al: The neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a NF-kappaB-regulated gene, is a survival factor for thyroid neoplastic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:14058–14063. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Barresi V, Ieni A, Bolignano D, Magno C, Buemi M and Barresi G: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin immunoexpression in renal tumors: correlation with histotype and histological grade. Oncol Rep. 24:305–310. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Nielsen BS, Borregaard N, Bundgaard JR, Timshel S, Sehested M and Kjeldsen L: Induction of NGAL synthesis in epithelial cells of human colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut. 38:414–420. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Zhang XF, Zhang Y, Zhang XH, Zhou SM, Yang GG, Wang OC, Guo GL, Yang GY and Hu XQ: Clinical significance of Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) expression in primary rectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 91:342009.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Hu L, Hittelman W, Lu T, Ji P, Arlinghaus R, Shmulevich I, Hamilton SR and Zhang W: NGAL decreases E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion and increases cell motility and invasion through Rac1 in colon carcinoma cells. Lab Invest. 89:531–548. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Friedl A, Stoesz SP, Buckley P and Gould MN: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Cell type-specific pattern of expression. Histochem J. 31:433–441. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Moniaux N, Chakraborty S, Yalniz M, et al: Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a marker of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Cancer. 98:1540–1547. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Kubben FJ, Sier CF, Hawinkels LJ, et al: Clinical evidence for a protective role of lipocalin-2 against MMP-9 autodegradation and the impact for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 43:1869–1876. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Zhang H, Xu L, Xiao D, et al: Upregulation of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: significant correlation with cell differentiation and tumour invasion. J Clin Pathol. 60:555–561. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Devireddy LR, Gazin C, Zhu X and Green MR: A cell-surface receptor for lipocalin 24p3 selectively mediates apoptosis and iron uptake. Cell. 23:1293–1305. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Toyokuni S: Role of iron in carcinogenesis: cancer as a ferrotoxic disease. Cancer Sci. 100:9–16. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Le NTV and Richardson DN: The role of iron in cell cycle progression and the proliferation of neoplastic cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1603:31462002.

26 

Fernandez CA, Yan L, Louis G, Yang J, Kutok JL and Moses MA: The matrix metallo-proteinase-9/neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin complex plays a role in breast tumor growth and is present in the urine of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 11:5390–5395. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Lee S, Jilani SM, Nikolova GV, Carpizo D and Iruela-Arispe M: Processing of VEGF-A by matrix metalloproteinases regulates bioavailability and vascular patterning in tumors. J Cell Biol. 169:681–691. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Yan L, Borregaard N, Kjeldsen L and Moses MA: The high molecular weight urinary matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity is a complex of gelatinase B/MMP-9 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Modulation of MMP-9 activity by NGAL. J Biol Chem. 276:37258–37265. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Leng X, Ding T, Lin H, et al: Inhibition of lipocalin 2 impairs breast tumorigenesis and metastasis. Cancer Res. 69:8579–8784. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Buss JL, Greene BT, Turner J, Torti FM and Torti SV: Iron chelators in cancer chemotherapy. Curr Top Med Chem. 4:1623–1635. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Jones DT, Trowbridge IS and Harris AL: Effects of transferrin receptor blockade on cancer cell proliferation and hypoxia-inducible factor function and their differential regulation by ascorbate. Cancer Res. 66:2749–2756. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-December 2010
Volume 1 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Barresi V, Lucianò R, Vitarelli E, Labate A, Tuccari G and Barresi G: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin immunoexpression in colorectal carcinoma: A stage-specific prognostic factor?. Oncol Lett 1: 1089-1096, 2010.
APA
Barresi, V., Lucianò, R., Vitarelli, E., Labate, A., Tuccari, G., & Barresi, G. (2010). Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin immunoexpression in colorectal carcinoma: A stage-specific prognostic factor?. Oncology Letters, 1, 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2010.191
MLA
Barresi, V., Lucianò, R., Vitarelli, E., Labate, A., Tuccari, G., Barresi, G."Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin immunoexpression in colorectal carcinoma: A stage-specific prognostic factor?". Oncology Letters 1.6 (2010): 1089-1096.
Chicago
Barresi, V., Lucianò, R., Vitarelli, E., Labate, A., Tuccari, G., Barresi, G."Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin immunoexpression in colorectal carcinoma: A stage-specific prognostic factor?". Oncology Letters 1, no. 6 (2010): 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2010.191