Screen and analysis of key disease genes for precancerous lesions of oral buccal mucosa induced by DMBA in golden hamsters
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 23, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2010.228
- Pages: 265-271
Abstract
Introduction
Oral cancer accounts for approximately 2% of systemic malignant tumors, of which 90% are squamous cell carcinomas (1). Buccal cancer is one of the most common oral cancers. Although great progress has been made in a variety of oral cancer treatment methods, the 5-year survival rate for buccal and oral cancer following treatment is only 55–60% (1,2). Previous studies confirmed that oral cancer is a complex, multiphase, multi-step pathological process involving multiple genetic changes (3,4), where a number of genes play various roles at different stages of cancer development. The majority (80%) of oral cancers originate from precancerous lesions (5). At present, no effective treatment method for the prevention of the occurrence of precancerous lesions exists. If effective intervention to prevent the occurrence of precancerous lesions at the molecular level is achieved, the early and effective prevention of oral cancer may also be achieved.
The development of microarray technology allows for whole-genome microarray technology to provide a comprehensive understanding of genetic changes during carcinogenesis and screen cancer-related genes to determine cellular gene expression profiles. Microarray technology is currently used in studying oral tumor markers (6,7), tumor molecular typing (8,9), drug screening (10) and the comparative analysis of discrepancies in gene expression patterns between cancer tissues and adjacent or normal tissue (11,12). However, no reports are currently available regarding the analysis of disease-related genes during the transformation of normal buccal mucosa to precancerous lesions on a whole-genome level.
An experimental animal model of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)-anthracene (DMBA)-induced oral buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma in Syrian golden hamsters was first reported in 1954 by Salley (13). The animal model was later shown to exhibit carcinogenesis, growth characteristics and biological behavior similar to that of human oral mucosal epithelial cells (14,15). Thus, it is considered to be an ideal animal model for studying oral mucosal carcinogenesis.
In this study, the DMBA-induced oral buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma in Syrian golden hamsters was used to establish precancerous lesions. Agilent whole-genome microarray containing 41,000 genes/EST sequences and bioinformatics analysis were used to screen and analyze precancerous disease-related genes during the transformation of normal buccal mucosa to precancerous lesions in order to identify cellular gene expression profiles. This procedure may provide data and methodology for the exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying precancerous lesions and their prevention.
Materials and methods
Main reagents and instruments
The following reagents and instruments were utilized: DMBA (Sigma Corporation, USA), 20 Syrian golden hamsters (Chengdu Institute of Biological Products, China), PCR instrument (PTC-100, MJ Company), hybrid furnace (G-2545A, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA), agilent scanner (G2565AA, Agilent Technologies), single-labeled agilent rat cDNA microarray (Agilent Technologies), Cy3 NHS ester (GE Healthcare, PA13105), aaUTP (Ambion, AM8436), low RNA input linear amplication kit (Agilent, 5184-3523), gene expression hybridization kit (Agilent, 5188–5242), gene expression wash buffer kit (Agilent, 5188–5327), stabilization and drying solution (Agilent, 5185–5979), gasket slide (Agilent, G2534-60003), hybridization chamber (Agilent, G2534A), RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, 74106) and RT-PCR kit (Bioflux). The animals and experimental procedures were approved by the Management Committee of Laboratory Animals Use, Institute of Laboratory Animal, Chongqing Medical University, China.
Establishment of hamster model with cheek pouch precancerous lesions
A total of 20 Syrian golden hamsters (10 males and 10 females; weight, 90–120 g; age, 6–8 weeks) were randomly divided into 2 groups (10 per group). Group I was considered the normal control group and group II the experimental group. The hamsters in group II were fixed on a self-made mouse shelf and the cheek pouches were opened. The bilateral hamster cheek pouches were painted with 0.5% DMBA acetone solution using a No. 1 oil pen every Monday, Wednesday and Friday afternoon for 6 weeks. The animals were then starved for 2 h. Group I was not treated. The animals were sacrificed in the 6th week and cheek pouch tissue samples were removed. Half of the tissue was immediately placed in liquid nitrogen for preservation and the remaining half was fixed using a 10% formalin solution. The fixed tissue samples were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and mounted. The pathological examination was performed via observation using light microscopy.
Diagnostic criteria for precancerous lesions
The precancerous lesions were diagnosed according to the 12 criteria set by the World Health Organization (WHO) (16). These criteria included: i) the disappearance of basal cell polarity, ii) stratified-like changes in basal cells, iii) increased ratio of nucleus to cytoplasm, iv) drop-shaped epithelial nail protrusion, v) disorder of the epithelial layer, vi) increased and abnormal mitosis, vii) increased mitosis (1/2 epithelium undergoing mitosis), viii) pleomorphic cells, ix) hyperchromatic nuclei, x) enlarged nucleolus, xi) diminished or lack of intercellular adhesion and xii) dyskeratosis. The diagnostic classification was based on the observation of the aforementioned criteria: 1–2 criteria, mild dysplasia; 3–4, moderate epithelial dysplasia; and ≥5, severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ. In this study, moderate dysplasial tissues were used for the experiments.
Extraction and purification of RNA from normal hamster cheek pouch mucosa and precancerous lesion samples
Total RNA from samples from groups I and II was extracted using the TRIzol extraction kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The Qiagen RNeasy kit was used to purify total RNA, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Equivalent amounts of total RNA from groups I and II were dissolved in Milli-Q water and preserved at −80°C.
cRNA labeling and synthesis
Extracted RNA samples were single-labeled with Cy3 using reverse transcription. The concrete steps were: 2 μg of RNA from the samples obtained from the 2 groups was added to two test tubes (1.5 ml) and 5 μl of primer was added. RNase-free water was added for a total volume of 11.5 μl and the contents were combined. The solution was incubated in a 60°C water bath for 10 min and cooled in ice water for 5 min. Then, 2 μl DDT (100 mmol/l), 1 μl dNTP, 4 μl 5 first strand buffer, 0.5 μl RNaseOUT and 1 μl MMLV RT were added to the RNA samples and combined. cRNA was synthesized in a 2-h reaction performed at 40°C, with a thermal cover heated to 65°C. The synthetic cRNA was labeled using aaUTP and purified using the Qiagen RNeasy mini kit. The cRNA concentration was measured using a spectrophotometer. The cRNA was then labeled and repurified.
cRNA fragmentation and microarray hybridization
Approximately 875 ng of Cy3-labeled cRNA extracted from the normal mucosa and precancerous lesions was added to 11 μl blocking agent and 2.2 μl fragmentation buffer. Nuclease-free water was added to make the total volume 55 μl. The mixture was incubated at 60°C for 30 min for fragmentation, following which 55 μl GEX hybridization buffer was added. Then, 100 μl of the above solution was added to the microarray for rolling hybridization at 65°C for 17 h at a speed of 10 rpm. The microarray was removed and washed in lotion 1 for 1 min and then washed with lotion 2 for 1 min at 37°C.
Microarray scanning and data processing
Microarray hybridization results were scanned using an Agilent G2565AA fluorescence scanner and read by feature extraction software. The scanner resolution was 5 μm, and the photomultiplier tubes were set to 100 and 10% for 2 scans. The scan results were automatically merged by Agilent software and feature extraction was used for uniform treatment. The homogenization coefficient in this experiment was 0.853. The ratio of average signal intensity and average background of the microarray was >3, which was consistent with the manufacturer's standards.
Bioinformatics analysis
Ratios of ≥2 and ≤0.5 were the threshold values for screening differentially expressed genes. Differentially expressed genes underwent functional classification according to the Gene Ontology (GO) classification standard. The databases KECG, GENMAPP and BIOCARTA (www.biorag.com) were used for signal pathway analysis and identification of the signal pathways for abnormally expressed genes. P<0.05 was used both to determine the significance of pathways and screen for target pathways.
Verification of microarray results by RT-PCR
From the microarray results, the Atp6v0d2 up-regulation and Sfrp2 down-regulation were randomly selected for verification by RT-PCR. In accordance with the instructions, the TRIzol kit (Invitrogen) was used for total RNA extraction from samples from groups I and II. RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed to cDNA in a 20 μl reaction using a thermocycler. The process involved 3 min pre-denaturation at 94°C; 30 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 94°C, 30 sec annealing at 52°C and 1 min extension at 72°C; and after 10 min at 72°C it was terminated. The PCR primers were designed by Primer 3.0 (Table I).
Results
Conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining of normal buccal mucosa and precancerous lesions
Group I comprised normal buccal mucosa. Cases in group II were classified according to the WHO criteria for precancerous lesions: 3 showed mild dysplasia and 7 moderate dysplasia (Fig. 1).
Microarray hybridization results and analysis of biological data Screen of differentially expressed genes in normal buccal mucosa and precancerous lesions
A total of 1331 genes, including 1278 known, 53 unknown, 747 up-regulated and 584 down-regulated genes, were found to be differentially expressed during the transformation of normal buccal mucosa to precancerous lesions in golden hamsters.
Gene Ontology functional classification
A total of 1331 differentially expressed genes were divided into 8 major functional groups according to the GO classification criteria (Table II).
Pathway analysis
Pathway analysis revealed a total of 14 gene interaction pathways significantly associated with the 1278 known differentially expressed genes (P<0.05). Only 21 genes in the 1278 differentially expressed genes enhanced the 14 pathways (Table III).
RT-PCR verification results
Atp6v0d2 up-regulation and Sfrp2 down-regulation were verified using RT-PCR (Fig. 2). The optical density values of the PCR bands were analyzed and compared with β-actin. Expression of Atp6v0d2 and Sfrp2 in cheek pouch mucosa precancerous lesions was 6.21 and 0.231 times, respectively, that of the normal cheek pouch mucosa, which was consistent with the microarray results (Table IV).
Discussion
This study identified 1331 genes that were differentially expressed during the transformation of normal buccal mucosa to precancerous lesions in golden hamsters. Additionally, the genes were found to act in 14 different pathways, suggesting that the occurrence of precancerous oral buccal mucosa lesions in golden hamsters is a complicated pathological process that involves a number of genetic changes that affect numerous pathways. GO analysis revealed that the differentially expressed genes can be divided into 8 functional groups, in which 30.78% of the genes identified are involved in the regulation of cell physiological processes and 29.84% are related to cell structure. Together, these two functional groups account for 60.62% of the 1331 genes identified, indicating that these genes are crucial in the formation of oral precancerous lesions.
Pathway analysis identified 14 gene interaction pathways that were significantly correlated to the 1278 known differentially expressed genes. Only 21 of the 1278 differentially expressed genes were enhanced in the 14 pathways. Since pathways express interactions between proteins, we suggest that the following candidate genes are key in the development of precancerous oral buccal mucosal lesions: Cyp2b13, Orc1L, casp8, CCL5, CXCL12, CCL20, Serping1, P518/Qrfp, F5, TFPI, Vcam1, Fn1, Angpt2, Lcp2, Cxadr, Lyn, Hck, Btk, RGD1564385/fes, Vav1 and IL5ra.
In the 14 pathways, caspase-8 (casp8) is formed from pro-casp8 following pro-casp8 activation in the apoptosis pathway. The caspase family of proteases is a group of aspartate-specific hydrolases containing cysteine. Following cascade activation of the caspases, the Fas receptor is activated and induces apoptosis, for which casp8 activation is the first step in cascade activation (17,18). In this study, casp8 was down-regulated, resulting in cell apoptosis.
The association of licensing factors with the pre-replicative complex pathway was primarily correlated to the regulation of DNA replication. DNA synthesis is required to induce a post-replicative state in the cell. Origin recognition complex (Orc) is a protein complex involved in the replication of eukaryotic DNA that regulates cell proliferation and the cell cycle (19). Orc1 is a key member of this protein complex (20) and is a crucial factor in the cell cycle progression from the G0 to G1/S phase. In this study, Orc1L was up-regulated in two pathways and promoted cell proliferation.
Chemokine receptors bind chemokines, and rhodopsin-like receptor pathways are subordinate branches of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway. GPCRs are members of the seven-pass transmembrane domain receptor superfamily. GPCRs, combined with chemokines, activate PKC kinases and Ras and Rho family members. Moreover, these receptors play a key role in cell growth, adhesion and directional migration. Previous studies showed that a high expression of chemokines CCL5 and CXCL12 promotes cell proliferation and cancer cell metastasis (21,22). CCL5 and CXCL12 were up-regulated in the three preceding pathways (signaling by GPCR, chemokine receptors bind chemokines and rhodopsin-like receptor pathways) in this study. CCL20 is known to be involved in the directional migration of dendritic and T cells. CCL20 promotes the chemotaxis of immature dendritic cells to tumor areas, activates T cells and triggers an immune response, thus inhibiting tumor growth (23). Previous studies showed that CCL20 is highly expressed in tumors (24). However, in this study, CCL20 in precancerous lesions was expressed at low levels in the three preceding pathways. This low expression may have led to a decreased local immunity, thereby promoting lesion development. P518/Qrfp is an endogenous GPCR ligand and its involvement in tumor development has not previously been reported.
Formation of the fibrin clot is a branch of the hemostasis pathway (25). F5 encodes coagulation factor V and the Serping1 gene encodes the C1 inhibitor. TPFI inhibits the extrinsic coagulation process and activation of FIX by the FVIIa tissue factor complex. In this pathway, F5 and Serping1 expression were up-regulated and TFPI expression was down-regulated, suggesting that the main characteristics of the vascular changes in precancerous lesions enhanced coagulation and inhibited anticoagulation.
The integrin cell surface pathway primarily mediates adhesion between cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM). Vcaml is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and high expression levels of Vcam1 enhance endothelial cell migration and promote angiogenesis (26). High expression levels of Fn, a macromolecular glycoprotein with a double-stranded structure (27), increase cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesion. In the integrin pathway, Vcam1 and Fn1 are highly expressed, enhancing the adhesion between cells and the ECM, thereby promoting angiogenesis.
We identified four abnormally expressed genes (Angpt2, Lcp2, Vcam1 and Cxadr) that were enhanced in signaling pathways involved in the immune system. A high expression of Angpt2 and Vcam1 promotes angiogenesis (26,28). Lcp2 plays a key role in T cell activation; however, its role in tumor formation has not previously been reported. Cxadr is a cell adhesion molecule and its decreased expression weakens intercellular adhesion (29). During precancerous lesion formation, we observed that Angpt2, Lcp2 and Vcam1 were up-regulated, whereas Cxadr was down-regulated. The combined effect of the three genes may promote angiogenesis.
The arachidonic acid (AA) and cytochrome P450 (CYP450)-dependent xenobiotic metabolic pathways are subordinate branches of biological oxidation pathways. AA is an essential fatty acid for the human body and previous studies have shown that abnormal AA in the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase metabolic pathways is associated with tumor occurrence and development (30,31). CYP450 is a group of isoenzymes with a similar structure and function encoded by a superfamily of genes. CYP450 plays a key role in the metabolism of endogenous and external carcinogens, chemical poisons and toxins. CYP450 induces genetic mutations or inhibits gene expression (32). Cyp2b13 is a member of a second CYP450 family and its expression in the two pathways was down-regulated. This down-regulation may lead to the decreased metabolism of exogenous toxins such as DMBA, and promote the formation of precancerous lesions.
The IL5 and IL6 pathways are correlated to the regulation of intracellular protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) activity. PTKs are crucial for cell signal transduction and the regulation of cell growth, proliferation and differentiation (33). Lyn, Btk, Hck and Fes are members of the non-receptor-type PTK family. A high expression of Lyn, Btk, Hck and Fes results in cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis and the promotion of angiogenesis (34–36). Up-regulation of Vav1 and IL5ra is correlated to tyrosine phosphorylation and the activation of signal transduction. Up-regulation of Lyn, IL5ra, Hck, Btk, RGD1564385 (fes) and Vav1 in the pathway enhances tyrosine kinase activity, thereby promoting cell proliferation and angiogenesis, and inhibiting apoptosis.
This study showed that precancerous buccal mucosal lesions in hamsters not only involved the abnormal expression of a number of genes, but that the identified differentially expressed genes induce the occurrence of precancerous lesions through various pathways. The overall mechanism involved in the formation of hamster buccal mucosal precancerous lesions requires that the chemical carcinogen DMBA act on the oral buccal mucosa. This activity results in changes in gene expression including that of Cyp2b13. Subsequently, DMBA metabolism (with cell and genetic toxicity) is reduced through the metabolism of xenobiotics by the CYP450 and AA metabolic pathways. The dual role of cell metabolism disorders and DMBA toxicity likely results in changes in the aforementioned genes and pathways, including activation of DNA replication (Orc1L up-regulation) and inhibition of the cell apoptosis pathway (casp8 down-regulation). The gene expression changes induced cell proliferation, angiogenesis, apoptosis inhibition, cell cycle regulation disorders and decreased local immunity, resulting in the occurrence and development of precancerous lesions. Therefore, we hypothesize that Cyp2b13, Orc1L, casp8 and the remaining 21 genes are candidates in the development of oral precancerous lesions. Inhibitors that regulate these genes or pathways effectively may improve treatment methods and chemoprophylaxis of precancerous lesions.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by the Medical Foundation of Chongqing City Health Bureau, Chongqing, P.R. China (No. 03-2-073).
References
Kademani D, Bell RB, Schmidt BL, Blanchaert R, Fernandes R, Lambert P and Tucker WM: Oral and maxillofacial surgeons treating oral cancer: a preliminary report from the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Task Force on Oral Cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 66:2151–2157. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bernier J and Cooper JS: Chemoradiation after surgery for high-risk head and neck cancer patients: how strong is the evidence? Oncologist. 10:215–224. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carinci F, Lo Muzio L, Piattelli A, et al: Genetic portrait of mild and severe lingual dysplasia. Oral Oncol. 41:365–374. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Choi P and Chen C: Genetic expression profiles and biologic pathway alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 104:1113–1128. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shiu MN and Chen TH: Impact of betel quid, tobacco and alcohol on three-stage disease natural history of oral leukoplakia and cancer: implication for prevention of oral cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 13:39–45. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nagata M, Fujita H, Ida H, et al: Identification of potential biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma by cDNA microarray analysis. Int J Cancer. 106:683–689. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kashiwazaki H, Hassan NM, Hamada J, et al: Gene expression profile changes correlated with lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Odontology. 96:38–43. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arora S, Matta A, Shukla NK, Deo SV and Ralhan R: Identification of differentially expressed genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 42:97–108. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Erdem NF, Carlson ER and Gerard DA: Characterization of gene expression profiles of 3 different human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines with different invasion and metastatic capacities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 66:918–927. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mendez E, Cheng C, Farwell DG, et al: Transcriptional expression profiles of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer. 95:1482–1494. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gottschlich S, Ambrosch P, Cordes C, Gorogh T, Schreiber S and Hasler R: Gene expression profiling of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using cDNA microarrays. Int J Oncol. 29:605–613. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Estilo CL, O-charoenrat P, Talbot S, et al: Oral tongue cancer gene expression profiling: identification of novel potential prognosticators by oligonucleotide microarray analysis. BMC Cancer. 9:112009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Salley JJ: Experimental carcinogenesis in the cheek pouch of the Syrian hamster. J Dent Res. 33:253–262. 1954. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng L and Wang Z: Chemopreventive effect of celecoxib in oral precancers and cancers. Laryngoscope. 116:1842–1845. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gimenez-Conti IB and Slaga TJ: The hamster cheek pouch carcinogenesis model. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 17F:83–90. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
World Health Organization. Report of a meeting of investigators on the histological definition of precancerous lesions. Geneva: World Health Organization; pp. 7311973 | |
Stupack DG, Teitz T, Potter MD, et al: Potentiation of neuroblastoma metastasis by loss of caspase-8. Nature. 439:95–99. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
McKee AE and Thiele CJ: Targeting caspase 8 to reduce the formation of metastases in neuroblastoma. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 10:703–708. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
DePamphilis ML: Cell cycle dependent regulation of the origin recognition complex. Cell Cycle. 4:70–79. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tatsumi Y, Ohta S, Kimura H, Tsurimoto T and Obuse C: The ORC1 cycle in human cells: I. cell cycle-regulated oscillation of human ORC1. J Biol Chem. 278:41528–41534. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burger JA and Kipps TJ: CXCR4: a key receptor in the crosstalk between tumor cells and their microenvironment. Blood. 107:1761–1767. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vaday GG, Peehl DM, Kadam PA and Lawrence DM: Expression of CCL5 (RANTES) and CCR5 in prostate cancer. Prostate. 66:124–134. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fushimi T, Kojima A, Moore MA and Crystal RG: Macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha transgene attracts dendritic cells to established murine tumors and suppresses tumor growth. J Clin Invest. 105:1383–1393. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rubie C, Frick VO, Wagner M, et al: Chemokine expression in hepatocellular carcinoma versus colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol. 12:6627–6633. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu JL, May L, Lhotak V, et al: Oncogenic events regulate tissue factor expression in colorectal cancer cells: implications for tumor progression and angiogenesis. Blood. 105:1734–1741. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakao S, Kuwano T, Ishibashi T, Kuwano M and Ono M: Synergistic effect of TNF-alpha in soluble VCAM-1-induced angiogenesis through alpha 4 integrins. J Immunol. 170:5704–5711. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gubala E, Wiench M, Oczko-Wojciechowska M, et al: [Gene expression analysis by DNA microarray in papillary thyroid cancer]. Endokrynol Pol. 56:752–757. 2005. | |
Koga K, Todaka T, Morioka M, et al: Expression of angiopoietin- 2 in human glioma cells and its role for angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 61:6248–6254. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang LL, He DL, Li X, Li L, Zhu GD, Zhang D and Wang XY: Overexpression of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor inhibit growth of human bladder cancer cell in vitro and in vivo. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 28:895–900. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cao Y and Prescott SM: Many actions of cyclooxygenase-2 in cellular dynamics and in cancer. J Cell Physiol. 190:279–286. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Poff CD and Balazy M: Drugs that target lipoxygenases and leukotrienes as emerging therapies for asthma and cancer. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 3:19–33. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brookman-Amissah N, Mackay AG and Swann PF: Isolation and sequencing of the cDNA of a novel cytochrome P450 from rat oesophagus. Carcinogenesis. 22:155–160. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Konecny GE, Pegram MD, Venkatesan N, et al: Activity of the dual kinase inhibitor lapatinib (GW572016) against HER-2-overexpressing and trastuzumab-treated breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66:1630–1639. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suh HS, Kim MO and Lee SC: Inhibition of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor signaling and microglial proliferation by anti-CD45RO: role of Hck tyrosine kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt. J Immunol. 174:2712–2719. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grosso S, Puissant A, Dufies M, et al: Gene expression profiling of imatinib and PD166326-resistant CML cell lines identifies Fyn as a gene associated with resistance to BCR-ABL inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther. 8:1924–1933. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stephens LR, Anderson KE and Hawkins PT: Src family kinases mediate receptor-stimulated, phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent, tyrosine phosphorylation of dual adaptor for phosphotyrosine and 3-phosphoinositides-1 in endothelial and B cell lines. J Biol Chem. 276:42767–42773. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar |