Open Access

Immunohistochemical expression of four different stem cell markers in prostate cancer: High expression of NANOG in conjunction with hypoxia‑inducible factor‑1α expression is involved in prostate epithelial malignancy

  • Authors:
    • Katsuhito Miyazawa
    • Takuji Tanaka
    • Dan Nakai
    • Nobuyo  Morita
    • Koji Suzuki
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 23, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2274
  • Pages: 985-992
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been identified in a variety of cancer types, including prostate cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of NANOG, octamer 4 (OCT4), cluster of differentiation 133 (CD133) and NESTIN, which are all CSC markers, and assess their function in prostate carcinogenesis. A total of 114 patients were referred to the Kanazawa Medical University Hospital (Uchinada, Japan) having presented with elevated serum prostate‑specific antigen levels and/or abnormal digital rectal examinations, and underwent transrectal ultrasound sonography guided eight core biopsies. The prostate pathological specimens were re‑evaluated for selection in this study. When specimens were diagnosed as prostate cancer, immunohistochemical analysis of the four different stem cell markers (NANOG, OCT4, CD133 and NESTIN) and hypoxia‑inducible factor (HIF)‑1α was performed. Prostate cancer was found in 38 cases (33.3%), while the other patients had benign prostate hyperplasia with prostatitis. All prostate cancers were histopathologically identified as adenocarcinomas of various grades, and cancer cells and intraepithelial neoplasia (high grade) were immunohistochemically shown to express NANOG and OCT4, but not CD133 and NESTIN. The intensity of NANOG expression was much greater than that of OCT4, and the positivity and intensity of the four stem cell markers, including NANOG, were elevated with high Gleason scores. A significant correlation was observed between the NANOG‑ and HIF‑1α‑positive regions. The CSC markers, in particular OCT4 and NANOG, were immunohistochemically expressed in prostate cancers. Furthermore, HIF‑1α expression may affect NANOG and/or OCT4 expression. The findings of the current study suggested that NANOG expression may be a biomarker for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, and the coexpression of NANOG and HIF‑1α may be involved in prostate carcinogenesis.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2014
Volume 8 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Miyazawa K, Tanaka T, Nakai D, Morita N and Suzuki K: Immunohistochemical expression of four different stem cell markers in prostate cancer: High expression of NANOG in conjunction with hypoxia‑inducible factor‑1α expression is involved in prostate epithelial malignancy. Oncol Lett 8: 985-992, 2014.
APA
Miyazawa, K., Tanaka, T., Nakai, D., Morita, N., & Suzuki, K. (2014). Immunohistochemical expression of four different stem cell markers in prostate cancer: High expression of NANOG in conjunction with hypoxia‑inducible factor‑1α expression is involved in prostate epithelial malignancy. Oncology Letters, 8, 985-992. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2274
MLA
Miyazawa, K., Tanaka, T., Nakai, D., Morita, N., Suzuki, K."Immunohistochemical expression of four different stem cell markers in prostate cancer: High expression of NANOG in conjunction with hypoxia‑inducible factor‑1α expression is involved in prostate epithelial malignancy". Oncology Letters 8.3 (2014): 985-992.
Chicago
Miyazawa, K., Tanaka, T., Nakai, D., Morita, N., Suzuki, K."Immunohistochemical expression of four different stem cell markers in prostate cancer: High expression of NANOG in conjunction with hypoxia‑inducible factor‑1α expression is involved in prostate epithelial malignancy". Oncology Letters 8, no. 3 (2014): 985-992. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2274