search button

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nedaplatin regimen followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Ting Jin
    • Xiao‑Zhong Chen
    • Jian‑Jiang Liu

  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 10, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3349
  • Pages: 1123-1130
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nedaplatin chemotherapy regimen, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone, in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Eighty‑six patients with stage III, IVA or IVB NPC, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy [gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 (d1) and d5; nedaplatin, 25 mg/m2 on d 1‑3] every 3 weeks for at least two cycles, followed by intensity‑modulated radiotherapy every 3 weeks, with or without concurrent nedaplatin (25 mg/m2, d1‑3) between September 2010 and December 2013, were retrospectively analyzed. By comparing pretreatment and post‑treatment MRI images, it was shown that seven patients achieved a complete response (8.5%), while 66 achieved a partial response (80.5%), following completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (combined response rate, 89.0%). Grade 3‑4 toxicities following neoadjuvant chemotherapy included neutropenia (29.1%), leukopenia (11.6%), liver dysfunction (9.3%), thrombocytopenia (9.3%) and nausea/vomiting (8.1%). The median follow‑up was 18 months (range, 5‑44 months). The 2‑year relapse‑free survival, distant metastasis‑free survival, progression‑free survival and overall survival rates were 96.6, 85.4, 83.3 and 96.1%, respectively. Compared with alternative neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in combination with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the present gemcitabine and nedaplatin did not provide additional survival benefit and led to a higher frequency of liver dysfunction. Therefore, neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nedaplatin should be used with caution in locoregionally advanced NPC.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2015
Volume 10 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

  • Journal Metrics
  • Impact Factor: 2.5
  • Ranked Oncology
    (total number of cites)
  • CiteScore: 5.7
  • CiteScore Rank: Q2: #139/404 Oncology
  • Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.574
  • SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.644
International Symposium on Molecular Medicine Conference Banner
The Cancer Story
World Congress on Advances in Oncology and International Symposium on Molecular Medicine Conference Banner
World Academy Of Sciences Banner
Heyday Road Banner

0

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Jin T, Chen XZ and Liu JJ: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nedaplatin regimen followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncol Lett 10: 1123-1130, 2015.
APA
Jin, T., Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2015). Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nedaplatin regimen followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 10, 1123-1130. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3349
MLA
Jin, T., Chen, X., Liu, J."Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nedaplatin regimen followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma". Oncology Letters 10.2 (2015): 1123-1130.
Chicago
Jin, T., Chen, X., Liu, J."Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine and nedaplatin regimen followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma". Oncology Letters 10, no. 2 (2015): 1123-1130. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3349