miR‑514a‑3p functions as a tumor suppressor in renal cell carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Lu Jin
    • Yifan Li
    • Zeng Zhang
    • Tao He
    • Jia Hu
    • Jiaju Liu
    • Mingwei Chen
    • Yaoting Gui
    • Shangqi Yang
    • Xiangming Mao
    • Yun Chen
    • Yongqing Lai
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 31, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6855
  • Pages: 5624-5630
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer, and the prognosis of metastatic RCC remains poor with a high rate of recurrence and mortality. A previous study has revealed that microRNA (miRNA), which negatively regulates protein expression, serves a role of oncogene or tumor suppressor. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression and function of miR‑514a‑3p in RCC. To detect the expression of miR‑514a‑3p in 32 paired RCC tissues, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed. The function of miR‑514a‑3p in the proliferation, mobility and apoptosis of RCC cells (786‑O and ACHN) was assessed by MTT, CCK‑8, cell scratch, Transwell, Hoechst 33342 staining and flow cytometry assay. The results of qPCR revealed that miR‑514a‑3p was significantly downregulated in RCC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. Upregulation of miR‑514a‑3p by transfection of mimics suppressed RCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced cell apoptosis. The results revealed that miR‑514a‑3p was significantly downregulated in RCC and may serve a role as tumor suppressor in RCC. Further studies are required, focusing on the possibility of using miR‑514a‑3p as a biomarker for RCC as well as the pathway of miR‑514a‑3p in RCC.

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the third most common urological cancer, accounts for ~3% of all adult malignancies and represents 90% of all kidney cancers (1,2). Estimated cancer statistics in the USA revealed that RCC was among the top ten cancer types in terms of its incidence and mortality rate, with 63,920 new cancer cases and 13,860 mortalities from kidney and renal pelvis cancer estimated to occur in 2014 (3). For early and local RCC, surgical resection remains the best curative therapy approach, while 20–30% of patients develop local and/or distant disease recurrence (4). For advanced RCC, surgical resection has no curative effect and the disease is resistant to standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with a five-year survival rate of <10% for patients with metastatic RCC (5,6). Thus, it is essential to understand the mechanisms of RCC tumorigenesis and development, and to search for novel biomarkers to improve the clinical outcomes of RCC.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are a class of non-coding RNAs with a length of ~22 nucleotides (7,8). They regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by imperfectly binding with the 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) of targeted messenger RNAs (mRNAs) to suppress translation or induce mRNA degradation (7). miRNAs regulate various cellular processes including cell differentiation, proliferation, metabolism and apoptosis (1). Investigations of miRNAs have provided a new direction in our understanding of the mechanisms of tumorigenesis of RCC. A number of miRNAs have been observed to be deregulated in RCC, including miR-206 (9), miR-30c (10) and miR-29b (11). Previous studies of microarrays indicated that miR-514a-3p (previously known as miR-514) was downregulated in RCC (12,13), although the expression of miR-514a-3p has not been verified in RCC tissues by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). In the present study, the expression of miR-514a-3p in RCC and adjacent normal tissues was explored and the function of miR-514a-3p in RCC cell lines was assessed.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

A total of 30 paired tissues (RCC and adjacent normal tissues) were collected from Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Guangdong, China). The adjacent normal tissues were extracted at 2 cm away from visible RCC lesions. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The collection and usage of the samples was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committees of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital. The tissues were immersed in RNAlater for over 30 min (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) after being dissected, and then stored at −80°C. The tissues collected were reviewed and classified by hematoxylin and eosin staining. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients are presented in Table I.

Table I.

Clinicopathological features of renal cell carcinoma patients.

Table I.

Clinicopathological features of renal cell carcinoma patients.

CharacteristicsNumber of cases
Mean age (range) (years)50 (25–70)
Sex
  Male/female19/11
Histological type
  Clear cell/papillary25/5
pT stage
  T1/T2/T3 +T418/8/4
Fuhrman grade
  I/II/III+IV18/7/5
AJCC clinical stages
  I/II/III+IV17/8/5

[i] pT, primary tumor; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.

Cell culture

Two RCC cell lines (786-O and ACHN; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were used in this study. Cells were cultured in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 at a temperature of 37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 1% antibiotics (100 µl/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin sulfates; Gibco) and 1% glutamine (Gibco).

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from the samples and cells by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and purified with the RNeasy maxi kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop 2000/2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). One microgram of RNA from each sample was used to obtain cDNA by performing reverse transcription PCR with a miScript reverse transcription kit (Qiagen). Then qPCR was performed with a miScript SYBR-Green PCR kit (Qiagen) on the Roche Lightcycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). U6 was used as an internal control and the sequences of the primers are shown in Table II. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 1 min, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 70°C for 30 sec. The expression levels of miR-514a-3p in tissues and cells were analyzed with the 2−ΔΔCq method.

Table II.

Sequences used in the study.

Table II.

Sequences used in the study.

Sequence
miR-514a-3p mimicSense: 5′-AUUGACACUUCUGUGAGUAGA-3′
Antisense: 5′-UACUCACAGAAGUGUCAAUUU-3′
Negative controlSense: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′
Antisense: 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′
Inhibitor NC 5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′
U6 forward primer 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′
U6 reverse primer 5′-ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′
miR-514a-3p forward primer5′- ATTGACACTTCTGTGAGTAGA-3′
miR-514a-3p reverse primerUniversal primer (miScript SYBR-Green PCR kit)

[i] NC, negative control.

Cell transfection

Synthesized miR-514a-3p mimic (GenePharma, Suzhou, China) or mimic negative control (NC) were transfected into cells with Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen), which was mixed in Opti-MEM® I reduced serum medium (Gibco) according to the manufacturer's protocol. qPCR was performed to measure the expression of miR-514a-3p in cells following transfection. The sequences used in the study are shown in Table II.

Cell scratch assay

Cell scratch assay was performed to assess the cell migratory ability of 786-O and ACHN cells. Approximately 3×105 cells were seeded in each well of a six-well plate. Twenty-four h later, the cells were transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics or mimic NC. At 6 h after transfection the cell monolayer was scratched with a sterile 1-ml pipette tip to generate a line-shaped wound. To remove the floating cells every well was rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then the cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS. A digital camera system was used to acquire images of the scratches at 0 and 24 h after making the scratch. The experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.

Cell proliferation assay

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and CCK-8 assay were performed to assess cell proliferative ability following transfection. A total of 5,000 cells were seeded in each well of a 96-well plate and 12 h later the cells were transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics or mimic NC. For the CCK-8 assay, 10 µl Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was added into the wells for detection at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h after transfection, and 1 h later the optical density (OD) of each well was measured using an ELISA microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 490 nm. For the MTT assay, 20 µl MTT (5 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was added into the wells for detection at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h after transfection, and 4 h later the mixed medium was replaced by 150 µl dimethylsulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Next, the 96-well plate was agitated for 15 min at room temperature. Then the OD of each well was measured by the ELISA microplate reader at a wavelength of 490 nm. The experiments were performed in sextuplicate and repeated at least three times.

Transwell assay

Transwell assay was performed to assess the cell migratory and invasive ability. In the assay, Transwell chamber inserts (BD Biosciences, New York, NJ, USA) with (for migration) or without Matrigel (BD; for invasion) were used following the manufacturer's protocol. Transfected cells (1×104) in 200 µl DMEM were seeded in the upper channel of the inserts. Cells were allowed to migrate for 36 h and invade for 48 h. The cells that migrated or invaded to the bottom of the inserts were stained with crystal violet for 25 min and then washed with PBS 3 times. The cells would be counted using a microscope. The experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times.

Hoechst 33342 staining assay

Approximately 3×105 cells were seeded in each well of a six-well plate, and 12 h later the cells were transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics or mimic NC. After 48 h the cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (5 µg/ml; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 20 min. Images of the cells were acquired with an immunofluorescent inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica DM IRB, Wetzlar, Germany) after washing twice in PBS.

Flow cytometry assay

The apoptotic rates of cells were measured by performing flow cytometry assay with an Alexa Fluor® 488 Αnnexin V/dead cell apoptosis kit (Invitrogen). Approximately 3×105 cells were seeded in each well of a six-well plate and 12 h later the cells were transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics or mimic NC. At 48 h after transfection all cells were harvested and stained according to the manufacturer's protocol. After 15 min of staining, 400 µl binding buffer (provided with the apoptosis kit) was added to each tube. Then flow cytometry (EPICS XL-4; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) was used to analyze the apoptosis rate. The experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times.

Statistical analysis

A paired t-test was used to compare the expression levels of miR-514a-3p in matched tumor/normal tissues and cells. Student's t-test was used to analyze assays for characterizing phenotypes of cells. All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 19.0 statistical software package (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). The results in all figures are shown as the means ± standard error. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-514a-3p is downregulated in RCC tissues

To determine the expression level of miR-514a-3p, qPCR was performed in 30 paired RCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues. The relative expression of miR-514a-3p [log2 (T/N), where T represents RCC tissues and N represents normal tissues] in tissues is shown in Fig. 1A. The relative expression of miR-514a-3p in RCC (0.44±0.16) was significantly lower compared with adjacent normal tissues, as shown in Fig. 1B (P<0.05).

Validation of expression of miR-514a-3p following transfection

To determine the expression level of miR-514a-3p following transfection, qPCR was performed. The results revealed that in cells transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics the expression of miR-514a-3p was 1043.84 times higher (786-O cells, P<0.001) and 541.09 times higher (ACHN cells, P<0.01) than in cells transfected with mimic NC. The results are shown in Fig. 2.

miR-514a-3p suppresses cell proliferation

MTT and CCK-8 assays were performed, and the results suggested that upregulation of miR-514a-3p suppressed cell proliferation. In 786-O cells the results revealed that at 24, 48 and 72 h the cell proliferation was reduced by 1.37, 10.40 (P<0.05) and 15.78% (P<0.01) (MTT assay, Fig. 3A) and 7.68 (P<0.05), 12.17 (P<0.05) and 10.50% (P<0.01) (CCK-8 assay, Fig. 3B) compared with cells transfected with mimic NC. In ACHN cells the results revealed that at 24, 48 and 72 h the cell proliferation was reduced by 8.68, 6.46 (P<0.05) and 9.50% (P<0.01) (MTT assay, Fig. 3C) and 9.92, 8.24 (P<0.05) and 8.02% (P<0.01) (CCK-8 assay, Fig. 3D). The results revealed that miR-514a-3p suppressed cell proliferation in RCC.

miR-514a-3p suppresses RCC cell mobility

Cell scratch assay and Transwell assay were performed to assess cell mobility. The results of cell scratch assay revealed that in cells transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics the migratory distance was reduced by 67.29% (786-O, P<0.01) and 27.26% (ACHN, P<0.05) compared with cells transfected with mimic NC, as shown in Fig. 4A and B. The results of Transwell assay revealed that upregulation of miR-514a-3p suppressed cell migration and invasion. As shown in Fig. 5A, the invasive 786-O cell number was reduced by 40.61% (P<0.01) and migratory cells were reduced by 53.08% (P<0.01) for cells transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics. For ACHN cells, upregulation of miR-514a-3p reduced invasive cells by 38.55% (P<0.05) and migratory cells by 29.44% (P<0.05), as shown in Fig. 5B. The results indicated that miR-514a-3p suppressed RCC cell mobility.

miR-514a-3p induces cell apoptosis

The apoptotic rate was qualified by flow cytometry and Hoechst 33342 staining. The results of flow cytometry indicated that the apoptotic rate of cells transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics or mimic NC was 21.08 vs. 10.32% (P<0.01) in 786-O cells (Fig. 6A) and 17.21 vs. 6.95% (P<0.01) in ACHN cells (Fig. 6B). The results of Hoechst 33342 staining are shown in Fig. 7, indicating that the apoptotic rate was 31.91 vs. 18.41% in 786-O cells transfected with miR-514a-3p mimics vs. mimic NC (Fig. 7A). In ACHN cells the apoptotic rate was 37.86% in cells transfected with mimic and 12.17% in cells transfected with NC (P<0.01; Fig. 7B). The results revealed that miR-514a-3p induced cell apoptosis in RCC.

Discussion

Emerging evidence has highlighted the role of non-coding RNA in post-transcriptional regulation of human tumorigenesis. Non-coding RNAs are divided into three groups: long non-coding RNAs, small non-coding RNAs and housekeeping RNAs (14). miRNA is a kind of non-coding RNA which is generated through multiple processes (1517). For most miRNA in mammals, the primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) are the transcripts transcribed by RNA polymerase II and at the length of 300–1,000 nucleotides. Pri-miRNA is processed in the nucleus by Drosha and DiGeorge syndrome critical region 8 to produce a small double-stranded hairpin-shaped pre-miRNA transcript, which is the precursor miRNA. Finally, the mature miRNA is generated with the help of Dicer (1517). The mature miRNA regulates gene expression post-transcriptionally by binding with the 3′UTR of targeted mRNA (1820).

Previous studies have revealed that miRNAs have unique expression profiles in different types of cancer or diseases at different stages, which indicates that miRNAs could be used as biomarkers for diagnosis and serve a significant role in the occurrence and development of tumors (21,22). In RCC, certain miRNAs have been described as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors based on the function and expression level of miRNAs. For example, miR-29s, miR-1, miR-133a and miR-497 have been described as tumor suppressors for downregulation in RCC (5,23,24), and the downregulation of miR-497 is associated with a poor prognosis for RCC patients. Conversely, miR-29b, miR-21 and miR-210 are overexpressed in RCC (1,11), and high expression of miR-29b is associated with the tumor-node-metastasis stage and prognosis of RCC. Thus, miRNAs are potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognostic judgment or targeted therapy in tumors.

miR-514a-3p (previously known as miR-514), located on chrXq27.3, has been demonstrated to be abnormally expressed in melanoma and metastatic RCC (25,26). In melanoma, Stark et al observed that miR-514a-3p negatively regulated nuclear factor 1 (NF1) and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) (26). Wotschofsky et al assessed the expression of miR-514a-3p in 111 RCC patients (22 cases with metastases and 89 without) and the results revealed that miR-514a-3p was further downregulated in metastatic RCC compared with non-metastatic RCC tissues (25). It was also indicated that miR-514a-3p could be used as an indicator of recurrence risk and an independent prognostic risk factor (25). In the present study, the results of qPCR revealed that miR-514a-3p was downregulated in RCC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. It was hypothesized that miR-514a-3p may serve a tumor suppressor role in RCC. In addition, RCC cellular function was assessed following overexpression of miR-514a-3p in RCC cells by transfecting miR-514a-3p mimics. It was observed that overexpression of miR-514a-3p suppressed RCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced RCC cell apoptosis. Thus, miR-514a-3p is a potential biomarker for RCC and may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism of RCC. Taken together, the results of the present study demonstrated that miR-514a-3p served a role as tumor suppressor in RCC.

Few studies have investigated the unique expression profile of miR-514a-3p in different cancers. In melanoma, only NF1 and CDK2 were confirmed to be regulated by miR-514a-3p. It remains to be elucidated how miR-514a-3p functions as a tumor suppressor. Further study should focus on the mechanism of miR-514a-3p in RCC.

In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrate that miR-514a-3p is significantly downregulated in RCC tissues and serves a role as tumor suppressor. Thus, miR-514a-3p is a potential biomarker for RCC. Further studies should be performed, focusing on the pathway of miR-514a-3p and the possibility of its use as a biomarker for RCC.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81101922), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (no. 2015A030313889), the Science and Technology Development Fund Project of Shenzhen (nos. JCYJ20120616144352139, JCYJ20130402114702124, JCYJ20140415162542975 and JCYJ20150403091443329) and the Fund of Guangdong Key Medical Subject.

References

1 

Neal CS, Michael MZ, Rawlings LH, Van der Hoek MB and Gleadle JM: The VHL-dependent regulation of microRNAs in renal cancer. BMC Med. 8:642010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Rasmussen F: Metastatic renal cell cancer. Cancer Imaging. 13:374–380. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64:9–29. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Rini BI, Rathmell WK and Godley P: Renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 20:300–306. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Zhao X, Zhao Z, Xu W, Hou J and Du X: Down-regulation of miR-497 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8:758–764. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Lam T, Marconi L, Merseburger AS, et al: EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 67:913–924. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Huang J, Yao X, Zhang J, Dong B, Chen Q, Xue W, Liu D and Huang Y: Hypoxia-induced downregulation of miR-30c promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 104:1609–1617. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Luo Z, Zhang L, Li Z, Jiang C, Dai Y, Liu X, Zheng Y, Yu H, Xiang J and Li G: miR-149 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 36:604–609. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Cai Y, Li H and Zhang Y: Downregulation of microRNA-206 suppresses clear cell renal carcinoma proliferation and invasion by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A. Oncol Rep. 35:1778–1786. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Wang J, Duan L, Guo T, Gao Y, Tian L, Liu J, Wang S and Yang J: Downregulation of miR-30c promotes renal fibrosis by target CTGF in diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 30:406–414. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Xu Y, Zhu J, Lei Z, Wan L, Zhu X, Ye F and Tong Y: Expression and functional role of miR-29b in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8:14161–14170. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Tang K and Xu H: Prognostic value of meta-signature miRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: An integrated miRNA expression profiling analysis. Sci Rep. 5:102722015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Nakada C, Matsuura K, Tsukamoto Y, Tanigawa M, Yoshimoto T, Narimatsu T, Nguyen LT, Hijiya N, Uchida T, Sato F, et al: Genome-wide microRNA expression profiling in renal cell carcinoma: Significant down-regulation of miR-141 and miR-200c. J Pathol. 216:418–427. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Esteller M: Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 12:861–874. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Miyoshi K, Miyoshi T and Siomi H: Many ways to generate microRNA-like small RNAs: Non-canonical pathways for microRNA production. Mol Genet Genomics. 284:95–103. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ha M and Kim VN: Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 15:509–524. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Denby L and Baker AH: Targeting non-coding RNA for the therapy of renal disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 27:70–77. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Li M, Wang Y, Song Y, Bu R, Yin B, Fei X, Guo Q and Wu B: MicroRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review of clinical implications (Review). Oncol Rep. 33:1571–1578. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Huang X, Huang M, Kong L and Li Y: miR-372 suppresses tumour proliferation and invasion by targeting IGF2BP1 in renal cell carcinoma. Cell prolif. 48:593–599. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Liu XJ, Hong Q, Wang Z, Yu YY, Zou X and Xu LH: MicroRNA21 promotes interstitial fibrosis via targeting DDAH1: A potential role in renal fibrosis. Mol Cell Biochem. 411:181–189. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Su Z, Chen D, Zhang E, Li Y, Yu Z, Shi M, Jiang Z, Ni L, Yang S, Gui Y, et al: MicroRNA-509-3p inhibits cancer cell proliferation and migration by targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 8 oncogene in renal cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 12:1535–1543. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Song T, Zhang X, Wang C, Wu Y, Cai W, Gao J and Hong B: MiR-138 suppresses expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma 786-O cells. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 12:1307–1311. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Kawakami K, Enokida H, Chiyomaru T, Tatarano S, Yoshino H, Kagara I, Gotanda T, Tachiwada T, Nishiyama K, Nohata N, et al: The functional significance of miR-1 and miR-133a in renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 48:827–836. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Nishikawa R, Chiyomaru T, Enokida H, Inoguchi S, Ishihara T, Matsushita R, Goto Y, Fukumoto I, Nakagawa M and Seki N: Tumour-suppressive microRNA-29s directly regulate LOXL2 expression and inhibit cancer cell migration and invasion in renal cell carcinoma. FEBS Lett. 589:2136–2145. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Wotschofsky Z, Busch J, Jung M, Kempkensteffen C, Weikert S, Schaser KD, Melcher I, Kilic E, Miller K, Kristiansen G, et al: Diagnostic and prognostic potential of differentially expressed miRNAs between metastatic and non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma at the time of nephrectomy. Clin Chim Acta. 416:5–10. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Stark MS, Bonazzi VF, Boyle GM, Palmer JM, Symmons J, Lanagan CM, Schmidt CW, Herington AC, Ballotti R, Pollock PM and Hayward NK: miR-514a regulates the tumour suppressor NF1 and modulates BRAFi sensitivity in melanoma. Oncotarget. 6:17753–17763. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2017
Volume 14 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Jin L, Li Y, Zhang Z, He T, Hu J, Liu J, Chen M, Gui Y, Yang S, Mao X, Mao X, et al: miR‑514a‑3p functions as a tumor suppressor in renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett 14: 5624-5630, 2017.
APA
Jin, L., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., He, T., Hu, J., Liu, J. ... Lai, Y. (2017). miR‑514a‑3p functions as a tumor suppressor in renal cell carcinoma. Oncology Letters, 14, 5624-5630. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6855
MLA
Jin, L., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., He, T., Hu, J., Liu, J., Chen, M., Gui, Y., Yang, S., Mao, X., Chen, Y., Lai, Y."miR‑514a‑3p functions as a tumor suppressor in renal cell carcinoma". Oncology Letters 14.5 (2017): 5624-5630.
Chicago
Jin, L., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., He, T., Hu, J., Liu, J., Chen, M., Gui, Y., Yang, S., Mao, X., Chen, Y., Lai, Y."miR‑514a‑3p functions as a tumor suppressor in renal cell carcinoma". Oncology Letters 14, no. 5 (2017): 5624-5630. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6855