Open Access

Molecular dynamic simulation of mutated β‑catenin in solid pseudopapillary neoplasia of the pancreas

  • Authors:
    • Varomyalin Tipmanee
    • Nawanwat C. Pattaranggoon
    • Kanet Kanjanapradit
    • Jirakrit Saetang
    • Surasak Sangkhathat
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 13, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8490
  • Pages: 9167-9173
  • Copyright: © Tipmanee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasia of the pancreas (SPN) is a rare pancreatic neoplasm that frequently harbors mutations in catenin β1 (CTNNB1, encoding β‑catenin) as a part of its molecular pathogenesis. Mutations to CTNNB1 reported in SPN usually occur at the serine/threonine phosphorylation sites, including codons 33, 37 and 41, and the flanking residues of codon 33. On analysis of 3 cases of SPN, mutations to CTNNB1 were detected in codon 32 (D32A and D32Y). As this residue, aspartic acid, is not a direct phosphorylation site of the protein, molecular modeling tools were used to predict the influence of these mutations on the protein structure of β‑catenin. A total of three MD simulations (wild‑type, D32A, and D32Y) were performed to visualize the conformations of β‑catenin under in vivo, aqueous‑phase conditions at 37˚C. In the wild‑type protein, the secondary structure of residues P16‑H28 remained helical; we therefore hypothesized that the helical structure of this protein fragment (residues M11‑G50) was necessary for phosphorylation of S33 phosphorylation. The loss of the secondary structure in P16‑H28 was observed in D32A, losing its helical structure and becoming a turn; however, in the D32Y mutant, the helical structure remained. The present demonstrated that structural changes in the mutated β‑catenin protein at D32 could potentially explain the mechanism behind its defective phosphorylation in the pathogenesis of SPN.

Introduction

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasia of the pancreas (SPN) is a rare pancreatic neoplasm accounting for <2% of pancreatic exocrine tumors. SPN usually occurs in young female patients during the second to third decade of life (1). In the majority of cases, the patient presents with a mixed cystic-solid mass in any region of the pancreas, which may compress adjacent organs and cause symptoms (2). SPN is generally regarded as a low-grade malignant tumor that is confined to the pancreas, for which en-bloc resection is the primary therapeutic method (3). The prognosis is generally favorable, except for patients with invasion and metastasis at the time of diagnosis, which is reported in ~5% of cases (4,5).

Histopathologically, SPN displays solid pseudopapillary areas intermixed with cystic regions, and consist of uniform polygonal-shaped cells with oval nuclei and abundant cytoplasm, with occasional pleomorphism and mitosis (6). The majority of SPNs are marked with neuron-specific enolase, vimentin and α1-antitrypsin and are immunohistochemically negative for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (3). In addition, Ki-67 immunoreactivity is associated with tumor aggressiveness and poorer patient prognosis. A recent study has revealed that the nuclear accumulation of the β-catenin protein is one of the pathological hallmarks of SPN (7). Further investigations reported somatic mutations to catenin β1 (CTNNB1) in the tumor tissue, with the majority being point mutations at serine/threonine residues that are phosphorylation sites of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), including at codons 33, 37 and 41, and the flanking residues of codon 33 (codons 32 and 34) (8). The most common mutation was reported at codon 32 (8).

β-catenin, encoded by CTNNB1, is centrally involved in the Wnt signaling pathway, which serves physiological roles in embryonic organ development (9). In differentiated cells, the cytosolic level of β-catenin is kept low by a ubiquitination process driven by phosphorylation of β-catenin at its clustered serine/threonine residues in exon 3 by casein kinase 1 (CK1), and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), which are the scaffolding proteins that serve a role in β-catenin ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (9). Mutations involving these phosphorylation sites are involved in the molecular pathogenesis of various pediatric embryonal tumors, including hepatoblastoma, Wilms tumor, medulloblastoma and pancreatoblastoma (1012). Codon 32, encoding for aspartic acid, is not the phosphorylation target itself. However, point mutations at Asp32 have been reported in various types of human cancer, including SPN (8). The juxtaposition of Asp32 mutation with Ser33 may result in conformational changes that prevent effective phosphorylation, hence the cytosolic retention of β-catenin and its translocation into the nucleus (13).

Functional genetic studies focusing on codon 32 revealed a reduction in ubiquitination activity in D32G, D32N and D32Y mutants when compared to the wild-type sequence (13,14). However, details regarding structural changes caused by codon 32 mutations have not been purposed. The present study investigated mutations to CTNNB1 detected in samples from three patients SPN and used molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to attempt to predict alterations to protein conformations caused by the mutations.

Materials and methods

Samples and polymerase chain reaction

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University (Hat Yai, Thailand) and patients provided written informed consent agreeing to their inclusion. Snap-frozen tumor specimens from three patients with SPN that underwent surgical resection in Songklanagarind Hospital were retrieved for DNA extraction. The cases included 1 male and 2 females, aged 12, 13 and 61 years, respectively. DNA extraction was done using GeneJET genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), following manufacturer's protocol. A mutation study covering the exon 2–4 of CTNNB1 was performed by polymerase chain reaction and direct nucleotide sequencing using 2 primer sets designed by Koch et al (15) and the PCR conditions reported by the study of Udatsu et al (16). PCR polymerase was performed by using TopTaq Master Mix kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with the condition as follows: 5 min at 95°C, 30 cycles (30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 58°C, 45 sec at 72°C) and 10 min at 72°C. All amplicon was then purified by GeneJET PCR Purification kit (Thermo scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Nucleotide sequencing was performed by the Scientific Equipment Center, Prince of Songkla University. Mutations to CTNNB1 in each case involved codon 32, consisting of two incidences of D32A and one of D32Y (Table I).

Table I.

Characteristics of the solid pseudopapillary neoplasias that were used in the present study.

Table I.

Characteristics of the solid pseudopapillary neoplasias that were used in the present study.

PatientCTNNB1 mutationTumor detailsCase data
1D32AA 6-cm cyst at the pancreatic head with pancreatic duct dilatation12-year-old male, alive 16 years following surgery
2D32YA 3-cm cyst at the pancreatic body with bilateral pleural effusion61-year-old female, recurrence at 8 years following surgery
3D32AA 5-cm well-encapsulated cyst at the head of the pancreas13-year-old female, alive 4 years following surgery

[i] CTNNB1, catenin β1.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry of the tumor tissue used the protocol presented in our previous work (17). Sections of 3-µm thickness were stained using β-catenin monoclonal antibody (cat. no. 6B3; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at a 1:1,000 dilution. Detection was then performed by using Bond Polymer Refine Detection system (Leica, Ltd., Milton Keynes, UK). This included all reagents: Peroxide blocking reagent (3–4%), polymer anti-mouse poly-HRP-IgG (<25 µg/ml) containing 10% (v/v) animal serum in tris-buffered saline/0.09% ProClin™ 950, DAB Part 1 (66 mM 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride hydrate, in a stabilizer solution), DAB Part B (≤0.1% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide in a stabilizer solution), and hematoxylin. The protocol used in this study was performed as followed: After endogenous peroxidase blocking, slides were incubated at room temperature with primary antibody for 120 min, followed by a 30 min incubation at room temperature with peroxidase labeled polymer conjugated to rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins. Color was then developed by the liquid 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride hydrate (DAB) chromogen. Counterstaining was performed with hematoxylin and imaged using a light microscope (magnification, ×20 and ×40). All procedures were performed according to the Bond Polymer Refine Detection system manufacturer protocol. Nuclear accumulation of β-catenin was demonstrated in the tissue of all cases (Fig. 1).

MD simulation of wild-type and mutated forms of β-catenin

To elucidate the role of the aforementioned mutations on β-catenin function, a three-dimensional (3D) structure was required. The wild-type β-catenin template was adopted from the first structure of an experimental nuclear magnetic resonance-derived structure from a rabbit (pdb code, 2G57), in which the sequence identity in the region of interest is identical to its human counterpart. As mutant structures of human β-catenin are not available, bioinformatics tools were introduced in the present study. In addition, MD simulation was performed to investigate the effects of point mutations on the protein conformation in detail.

The structure prediction was commenced using residues 11–50 of the chosen β-catenin sequence. The residue numbers refer to those of the human β-catenin protein sequence (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P35222). For each β-catenin (wild-type, D32A or D32Y), a secondary structure was independently predicted using two bioinformatics tools, PSIPRED Protein Sequence Analysis Workbench (18,19) and NetSurfP version 1.1 (20). A prediction of the 3D structure of the wild type was performed using PEP-fold server (2123), using the structure of rabbit β-catenin as a molecular template. The wild-type structure was finally chosen from 50 possible structures corresponding to the aforementioned predicted secondary structure predictions. For the mutant, the 3D structures of D32A and D32Y were constructed using the point mutation module of the Rosetta Backrub server (23), and the aforementioned wild-type structure was exploited as a template. The selection of the predicted structure was performed using the best result from 50 possible structures based on the highest prediction score.

Each constructed β-catenin structure was solvated in the TIP3P water rectangular box, ~4,400 water molecules, with a distance of 12 Å from the protein surface using the command from tleap module in AMBER16 package. Sodium chloride was then added into the system to make it equivalent to 0.15 M NaCl solution. Protonation states in all ionizable amino acid side chains were set at pH 7. The protein-solution system was modeled using AMBER10 force field, which was included in an AMBER 16 package (24). Prior to MD simulation, the system was energy-minimized to remove unusual inter-atomic contacts, using the steepest descent method for 2,000 steps. The system was then equilibrated in a constant number (N), volume (V), and temperature (T) (NVT) ensemble for 600 psec, where the protein was position-restrained using force constants of 250, 150, 100, 50, 20, and 10 kcal/mol/Å2 for each 100 psec simulation. A time step of 1 sec was applied in each NVT run and a temperature of 310 K (37°C) was controlled using Langevin dynamics (25). The simulation was subsequently switched to an isobar/isothermal (constant number (N), pressure (P), and temperature (T); NPT) ensemble, with a temperature of 310 K and a pressure of 1 atm, regulated by Berendsen algorithms (26). Short- and long-range interactions were computed using a 12 Å cutoff and electrostatic forces were computed using Lennard-Jones 6–12 potential and Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) method (27), in which both are implemented in the AMBER16 simulation program. The NPT simulation was performed for 200 nsec, with a time step of 2 fsec. The energy minimization and MD simulations were performed using SANDER and PMEMD modules, respectively, using the AMBER 16 package (28). The first 100-nsec NPT simulation was omitted as an equilibrated phase and 100 equidistant snapshots from the last 100 nsec were taken for analysis. The simulations of wild-type and mutant β-catenins followed an identical protocol. All structure visualization was performed using Visual Molecular Dynamics package version 1.9.1 (29) which is freely available online from Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.

Results

Each modeled tertiary structure of the β-catenin fragment (M11-G50) was in good agreement with the predicted secondary structure of its counterpart (Fig. 2). Since the protein fragment (M11-G50) also consists of S33, an important phosphorylation site for β-catenin functions (3034), the simulation was performed with the hypothesis that the domain requires a specific conformation for phosphorylation to occur, and a point mutation could affect the phosphorylation by inducing a conformational change. Therefore, three MD simulations (wild-type, D32A, and D32Y) were performed to visualize the β-catenin conformations under in vivo, aqueous-phase conditions at 37°C. Conformational abnormalities in mutant proteins may interfere with the phosphorylation of S33 and eventually contribute to β-catenin dysfunction. Additionally, the secondary structure of each residue in β-catenin residue was plotted against the simulation time to investigate the conformational changes of the 3D structure at the S33 site.

The stability of structural dynamics was observed via the Ramachandran plot from average structure, rather than the root-mean-square-displacement, owing to the high flexible coil in the fragment structure. The plot illustrated that <1% of the overall amino acids in the dynamics trajectories fell into the outlier (disallowed) region (Fig. 3). Initially, the P16-H28 fragment was predicted to be a helical structure in the first place (Fig. 2). In the wild-type protein, after 100 nsec, the secondary structure of P16-H28 remained helical, similar to the starting structure (Fig. 4). These results indicated that the helical structure of this protein fragment (P16-H28) is a prerequisite to S33 phosphorylation. A similar pattern of secondary structure was observed in the D32Y fragment (Fig. 5). This indicated that D32Y mutation, at least, may not affect phosphorylation activity via conformation distortion in this area. However, in the D32A mutant, a loss in the helical secondary structure of P16-H28 was observed, moving from a helical shape into a turn (Fig. 6). The D32A mutant therefore clearly possesses structural differences to the wild type β-catenin, and the mutation could enhance protein unfolding via alternation of the helical structure to interfere with the functional S33 position.

Discussion

SPN belongs to a group of human cancer types that occur in developing organs with somatic mutations to CTNNB1. Patterns of CTNNB1 mutation differ, and are specific to tumor types. In nephroblastoma, CTNNB1 mutations usually occur to codon 45, whereas the majority of mutations in hepatoblastoma are large deletions involving exon 3 (10,35). Defective phosphorylation caused by β-catenin sequence alterations involves the priming phosphorylation sites for casein kinase I proteins, underlying the molecular mechanism of tumorigenesis of those neoplasms. Tumors containing mutations on the main phosphorylation sites are relatively fast-growing, invasive and respond well to chemotherapy. The mutation spots in medulloblastomas and pancreatoblastomas are confined to residues 33 and 37, which are sequential phosphorylation sites for GSK-3β (10). Tumors harboring lesions on those secondary phosphorylation sites are usually found in older children and are relatively non-invasive (10).

Alterations to CTNNB1 codon 32 have been reported in rare tumor types, including SPN, pilomatrixomas and medulloblastomas (3638). These tumors are relatively low-grade and rarely undergo distant metastasis. The study of Ellison et al (36) demonstrated that codon 32 was the most commonly mutated in childhood medulloblastoma. The current study detected mutations to this codon in each of the three cases studied. Together, this evidence supports the relevance of the molecular pathology in these rare tumors.

Three-dimensional molecular simulation is a useful computational tool for the prediction of the molecular structure of biomolecules, particularly proteins. The present study demonstrated that amino acid alterations to codon 32 tend to interfere with a helical structure within β-catenin. The MD simulations indicated that the D32A mutation was responsible for hindrance of phosphorylation at S33 in β-catenin by contributing to a loss of secondary structure, although D32Y may not act in the same way. Data from the structural prediction were consistent with a previous functional genetic study by Al-Fageeh et al (13), which demonstrated increased T-cell factor transactivation in a 293 cell culture model.

In conclusion, the present study used a computer-generated molecular structure model to successfully predicted conformational changes to β-catenin caused by point mutations at codon 32. These data indicate at the mechanism of tumorigenesis in patients with SPN that possess D32 β-catenin mutations.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was partially supported by the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University (Kho Hong, Thailand; grant no. 59-221-10-1).

Availability of data and materials

The analyzed data sets generated during the study are available from the corresponding author, on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

VT and NCP performed in silico molecular modeling of the β-catenin protein. KK interpreted the pathological and immunohistochemistry results. JS performed the mutation study and wrote the manuscript. SS collected the clinical data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University (Hat Yai, Thailand) and all patients provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Patients provided written informed consent for the publication of their data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Guo N, Zhou QB, Chen RF, Zou SQ, Li ZH, Lin Q, Wang J and Chen JS: Diagnosis and surgical treatment of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: Analysis of 24 cases. Can J Surg. 54:368–374. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Papavramidis T and Papavramidis S: Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: Review of 718 patients reported in English literature. J Am Coll Surg. 200:965–972. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Yagcı A, Yakan S, Coskun A, Erkan N, Yıldırım M, Yalcın E and Postacı H: Diagnosis and treatment of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: Experience of one single institution from Turkey. World J Surg Oncol. 11:3082013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Lee JS, Han HJ, Choi SB, Jung CW, Song TJ and Choi SY: Surgical outcomes of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A single institution's experience for the last ten years. Am Surg. 78:216–219. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ansari D, Elebro J, Tingstedt B, Ygland E, Fabricius M, Andersson B and Andersson R: Single-institution experience with solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. Scand J Gastroenterol. 46:1492–1497. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Adams AL, Siegal GP and Jhala NC: Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: A review of salient clinical and pathologic features. Adv Anat Pathol. 15:39–45. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Huang SC, Ng KF, Yeh TS, Chang HC, Su CY and Chen TC: Clinicopathological analysis of β-catenin and Axin-1 in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 19 Suppl 3:S438–S446. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Kobayashi T, Ozasa M, Miyashita K, Saga A, Miwa K, Saito M, Morioka M, Takeuchi M, Takenouchi N, Yabiku T, et al: Large solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas with aberrant protein expression and mutation of β-catenin: A case report and literature review of the distribution of β-catenin mutation. Intern Med. 52:2051–2056. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

MacDonald BT, Tamai K and He X: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: Components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell. 17:9–26. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Koesters R and von Knebel Doeberitz M: The Wnt signaling pathway in solid childhood tumors. Cancer Lett. 198:123–138. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Sangkhathat S, Kusafuka T, Miao J, Yoneda A, Nara K, Yamamoto S, Kaneda Y and Fukuzawa M: In vitro RNA interference against β-catenin inhibits the proliferation of pediatric hepatic tumors. Int J Oncol. 28:715–722. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Sangkhathat S, Kanngurn S, Chaiyapan W, Gridist P and Maneechay W: Wilms' tumor 1 gene (WT1) is overexpressed and provides an oncogenic function in pediatric nephroblastomas harboring the wild-type WT1. Oncol Lett. 1:615–619. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Al-Fageeh M, Li Q, Dashwood WM, Myzak MC and Dashwood RH: Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of oncogenic mutants of beta-catenin containing substitutions at Asp32. Oncogene. 23:4839–4846. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Provost E, McCabe A, Stern J, Lizardi I, D'Aquila TG and Rimm DL: Functional correlates of mutation of the Asp32 and Gly34 residues of beta-catenin. Oncogene. 24:2667–2676. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Koch A, Denkhaus D, Albrecht S, Leuschner I, von Schweinitz D and Pietsch T: Childhood hepatoblastomas frequently carry a mutated degradation targeting box of the beta-catenin gene. Cancer Res. 59:269–273. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Udatsu Y, Kusafuka T, Kuroda S, Miao J and Okada A: High frequency of beta-catenin mutations in hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 17:508–512. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wanitsuwan W, Kanngurn S, Boonpipattanapong T, Sangthong R and Sangkhathat S: Overall expression of beta-catenin outperforms its nuclear accumulation in predicting outcomes of colorectal cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 14:6052–6059. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Buchan DW, Minneci F, Nugent TC, Bryson K and Jones DT: Scalable web services for the PSIPRED protein analysis workbench. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:(Web Server issue). W349–W357. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Jones DT: Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 292:195–202. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Petersen B, Petersen TN, Andersen P, Nielsen M and Lundegaard C: A generic method for assignment of reliability scores applied to solvent accessibility predictions. BMC Struct Biol. 9:512009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Maupetit J, Derreumaux P and Tuffery P: PEP-FOLD: An online resource for de novo peptide structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:(Web Server Issue). W498–W503. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Maupetit J, Derreumaux P and Tufféry P: A fast method for large-scale de novo peptide and miniprotein structure prediction. J Comput Chem. 31:726–738. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Thévenet P, Shen Y, Maupetit J, Guyon F, Derreumaux P and Tufféry P: PEP-FOLD: An updated de novo structure prediction server for both linear and disulfide bonded cyclic peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:(Web Server Issue). W288–W293. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Case DA, Cerutti DS, Cheatham TE III, Darden TA, Duke RE, Giese TJ, Gohlke H, Goetz AW, Greene D, Homeyer N, et al: AMBER 2017. University of California, SF; 2017

25 

Pastor RW, Brooks BR and Szabo A: An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms. Mol Phys. 65:1409–1419. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Gunsteren WF, van DiNola A and Haak JR: Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys. 81:3684–3690. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Darden TA and Pedersen LG: Molecular modeling: An experimental tool. Environ Health Perspect. 101:410–412. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Case DA, Darden TA, Cheatham TE III, Simmerling CL, Wang J, Duke RE, Luo R, Walker RC, Zhang W, Merz KM, et al: AMBER 12. University of California, SF; 2012

29 

Humphrey W, Dalke A and Schulten K: VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 14(33–38): 27–28. 1996.

30 

Morin PJ, Sparks AB, Korinek V, Barker N, Clevers H, Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW: Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science. 275:1787–1790. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Chan EF, Gat U, McNiff JM and Fuchs E: A common human skin tumour is caused by activating mutations in beta-catenin. Nat Genet. 21:410–413. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Legoix P, Bluteau O, Bayer J, Perret C, Balabaud C, Belghiti J, Franco D, Thomas G, Laurent-Puig P and Zucman-Rossi J: Beta-catenin mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma correlate with a low rate of loss of heterozygosity. Oncogene. 18:4044–4046. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Huang H, Mahler-Araujo BM, Sankila A, Chimelli L, Yonekawa Y, Kleihues P and Ohgaki H: APC mutations in sporadic medulloblastomas. Am J Pathol. 156:433–437. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

van Noort M, van de Wetering M and Clevers H: Identification of two novel regulated serines in the N terminus of beta-catenin. Exp Cell Res. 276:264–272. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Koesters R, Ridder R, Kopp-Schneider A, Betts D, Adams V, Niggli F, Briner J and von Knebel Doeberitz M: Mutational activation of the beta-catenin proto-oncogene is a common event in the development of Wilms' tumors. Cancer Res. 59:3880–3882. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

36 

Ellison DW, Onilude OE, Lindsey JC, Lusher ME, Weston CL, Taylor RE, Pearson AD and Clifford SC: United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Brain Tumour Committee: beta-Catenin status predicts a favorable outcome in childhood medulloblastoma: The United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Brain Tumour Committee. J Clin Oncol. 23:7951–7957. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Chmara M, Wernstedt A, Wasag B, Peeters H, Renard M, Beert E, Brems H, Giner T, Bieber I, Hamm H, et al: Multiple pilomatricomas with somatic CTNNB1 mutations in children with constitutive mismatch repair deficiency. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 52:656–664. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Silva RD, Marie SK, Uno M, Matushita H, Wakamatsu A, Rosemberg S and Oba-Shinjo SM: CTNNB1, AXIN1 and APC expression analysis of different medulloblastoma variants. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 68:167–172. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2018
Volume 15 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tipmanee V, Pattaranggoon NC, Kanjanapradit K, Saetang J and Sangkhathat S: Molecular dynamic simulation of mutated β‑catenin in solid pseudopapillary neoplasia of the pancreas. Oncol Lett 15: 9167-9173, 2018.
APA
Tipmanee, V., Pattaranggoon, N.C., Kanjanapradit, K., Saetang, J., & Sangkhathat, S. (2018). Molecular dynamic simulation of mutated β‑catenin in solid pseudopapillary neoplasia of the pancreas. Oncology Letters, 15, 9167-9173. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8490
MLA
Tipmanee, V., Pattaranggoon, N. C., Kanjanapradit, K., Saetang, J., Sangkhathat, S."Molecular dynamic simulation of mutated β‑catenin in solid pseudopapillary neoplasia of the pancreas". Oncology Letters 15.6 (2018): 9167-9173.
Chicago
Tipmanee, V., Pattaranggoon, N. C., Kanjanapradit, K., Saetang, J., Sangkhathat, S."Molecular dynamic simulation of mutated β‑catenin in solid pseudopapillary neoplasia of the pancreas". Oncology Letters 15, no. 6 (2018): 9167-9173. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8490