Microbiota dysbiosis is associated with HPV‑induced cervical carcinogenesis

  • Authors:
    • Wojciech Kwasniewski
    • Maria Wolun‑Cholewa
    • Jan Kotarski
    • Wojciech Warchol
    • Dorota Kuzma
    • Anna Kwasniewska
    • Anna Gozdzicka‑Jozefiak
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 26, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9509
  • Pages: 7035-7047
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Cervical microbial communities serve a crucial role in the persistence and development of oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV) infections. In the present study, the authors hypothesised that disturbed heterogeneity of microbial flora was associated with HPV‑induced carcinogenesis. Swabs of the cervical microbiota were collected from 250 women and the 16S ribosomal DNA was sequenced using a high throughput assay. The swabs of cervical microbiota were grouped according to the community state types (CSTs) as follows: Healthy cervical swabs; swabs taken from low‑grade squamous intra‑epithelial lesions (LSIL) and swabs taken from high‑grade squamous intra‑epithelial lesions (HSIL). Analysis of the bacterial classes revealed that the CST cervical swabs of the volunteers were characterised by Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis, however, Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus were absent. In the CST of patients with LSIL the predominant type of bacteria was Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus iners, however Lactobacillus crispatus was not detected. Swabs from CST women diagnosed with HSIL exhibited abundant Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, however, lacked Lactobacillus taiwanensis, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus crispatus. The abundance of Lactobacillus acidophilus in swabs from the healthy women was compared with the swabs from the women with LSIL. The results of the present study indicated that the development of HPV‑induced cancer is associated with a high diversity of vaginal microbiota, which is involved in the control of viral persistence, and is therefore indicative of disease prognosis.

Introduction

It has been reported that the female cervix maintains communities of microbial species, which have a symbiotic relationship with the host (1). It has been demonstrated that the female cervix is colonized by diverse microbiota, which serve a crucial role in cervicovaginal health (1). However, it has been indicated that the type of organisms present is dependent on the prevailing environmental conditions and host factors (1,2). Over the last decade, it has been indicated that the development and introduction of molecular-based technology has provided novel information regarding the composition of the vaginal-cervical flora, as well as the abnormal colonization of the genital tract by pathogens (2). The aforementioned findings may help to elucidate the microbiome of the genital tract in healthy women and in human papilloma virus (HPV)-dependent carcinogenesis.

The majority of previous studies have indicated that the cervical/vaginal microbial flora has a prevalence of Lactobacillus species, which produce lactic acids that maintain an acidic environment and may inhibit pathogenic growth (28). Specifically, lactic acid and other related acidic compounds have been reported to inhibit bacterial growth associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV), as well as viral infections (3). In addition, lactic acid has been recognized as a component of the immune defence system, as it has been demonstrated to potentiate the production of protective proinflammatory cytokines by vaginal epithelial cells, to promote the activation of T helper 17 lymphocytes, to stimulate dendritic cell maturation and induce interferon production (1). Over 120 Lactobacillus species have been identified and over 20 species have been identified in the vagina (2).

The dominant microorganisms in the vagina of a healthy woman during puberty have been reported to be from the Lactobacillus genus, including L. acidophilus, L. fermentum, L. plantarum, L. brevis, L. jenseni, L. casei, L. catenaforme, L. delbrueckii and L. salivarius (1,2). It is considered that in the majority of cases, vaginal inflammation is not caused by novel microorganisms introduced from the outside, but instead by a disturbance to the proportion and number of microorganisms already existing in the vagina (4). Each bacterium has been reported as a potential etiological factor of inflammation, including Lactobacillus (4). It has been reported that anaerobic bacteria have a significantly increased pathogenic potential compared with aerobic bacteria (5,6). Factors, which have been reported to potentially disturb vaginal biocenosis include the following hormonal changes: Pregnancy, puberty, menopause and hormonal contraception, particularly using low doses of estrogen; vaginal sterilization following chemo- or antibiotic therapy; surgical conditions such as vaginoplasty, erosions, poor genitalia hygiene, including the vulva and the vagina, and lack of a regimented sex life, i.e. frequent, unprotected, lack of a regular sex life (46). Large variation in the number and composition of bacteria has been reported among women, and among time intervals for one woman (5,6). Therefore, attempting to evaluate the vaginal microbiome is extremely difficult.

A healthy cervicovaginal microenvironment has been reported to be characterised by high levels of different species of Lactobacillus, including the predominant L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii and L. gasseri. Other species may occur occasionally (2,6). In rare cases, it has been reported that the cervix can be colonized by the same two or four Lactobacillus species (4). The aforementioned cases have been demonstrated to be dependent on a number of genetic and environmental factors, including nationality, diet and age (2,6). A number of previous studies have indicated that, in a significant proportion of healthy women, the Lactobacillus in the vagina may be replaced by other lactic acid-producing bacteria, including Atopobium vaginae, Megaspharea and Leptotrichia species (3). It has been indicated that an abnormal vaginal microenvironment may be caused by sexually transmitted infection (3). It has been reported that trichomoniasis may be caused by colonization with a microorganism not commonly identified within vaginal colonies, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Listeria monocytogenes (6,7). In addition, it has been reported that an abnormal microenvironment may be caused by an invasion of an alternative organism, which is a component of the normal vaginal flora, including Escherichia coli (3). Bacterial vaginosis has been reported as a disorder characterised by a decrease in the quality or quantity of Lactobacillus and the growth of Mycoplasma hominis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus species, Neisseria gonorrhea, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Prevotella species (4,5). A previous meta-analysis reported a positive association between cervical HPV infection and BV (6,7). The reverse phenomenon of HPV as a risk factor for BV invasion has also been described (8).

It has been demonstrated that HPV is considered a principal factor responsible for the development of cervical cancer (8). However, it has been suggested that HPV infection alone does not cause cervical carcinogenesis and that other factors, such as prolonged oral contraceptive or smoking, may be involved in the disease progression (8). To determine whether the vaginal microflora is affected by one of these factors, the present study investigated the association between cervical and vaginal infections, and pre-cancerous lesions of the cervix.

Materials and methods

Patient samples

Women included in the present study were recruited from cervical cancer screening in the Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin in Poland between February 2003 and August 2015. The study group consisted of 250 women. Patients whose molecular analysis indicated that they were HPV-positive [HPV(+)] were included within the analysed group (n=180), whereas the healthy women [HPV(−)] were included within the control group (n=70).

Cytology and HPV status were used to classify the patients into the following 3 groups: Control group [n=70); HPV(−)]; women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL; n=95; HPV(−)], and women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL; n=85; HPV(+)]. The mean ages of patients with LSIL and HSIL, and the control group, did not significantly differ: 35 years (range, 25–48) and 37 years (range, 29–48) compared with 37 years (range 21–48), respectively (P>0.05). The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lublin (Lublin, Poland). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the present study and the research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

The patient inclusion criteria for the present study for the research and control groups were as follows: i) Cytological diagnosis of LSIL or HSIL or patients with a normal cytological swab; ii) HPV (+) or (−) status; iii) no use of oral and/or vaginal probiotics for 30 days prior to the start of the present study; iv) absence of genital tract infection during the 30 days prior to the classification of patients in the study, and v) a maximum of one sexual partner for 30 days prior to qualification testing.

The exclusion criteria for participating in the present study included the following: i) Vaginal bleeding of unknown etiology; ii) pregnancy; iii) oral contraceptive use or hormone replacement therapy; iv) cigarette smoking; v) history of other types of cancer; vi) systemic diseases; vii) diabetes, and viii) thyroid or other endocrine diseases.

Cervical swabs were collected from patients and to rule out experimental bias or random error. pooling was performed in 3 subgroups as follows: in the control group 23, 23, 24 swabs were pooled; in the LSIL group 31, 32, 32 were pooled, and in the HSIL group 28, 28, 29 swabs were pooled. The pooled cervical swabs were stored immediately at −80°C for a maximum 12 months. The cervical cytological findings were classified according to the Bethesda system (9).

DNA isolation from the swabs

Total DNA was extracted from cells using a DNA isolation kit (QIAamp DNA kit; cat. no. 51306; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's protocols.

Identification of HPV DNA

Identification of HPV-derived DNA was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of HPV gene sequences. The MY09, MY11, LC1 and LC2 primers (Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland) that were complementary to the genomic sequence of the predominantly diagnosed HPV types were used, as previously described (10).

Typing of 16S ribosomal DNA (16S rRNA) by PCR-amplification and next generation sequencing

The V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA in bacterial genes were detected by PCR, as previously described (11). Sequencing and sequence analysis was performed at Genomed S.A, Warszawa (Poland).

Statistical analysis

The difference in the mean age of the female patients was tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test and was statistically significant if the calculated P>0.05. Using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data, the frequency of bacteria occurrences were calculated by multiplying the total number of present bacteria with the percentage of bacterial concentration in the cervical swabs. The statistical analysis was performed using k-means cluster analysis (k-means clustering algorithm) and Statistica 12.0 software (StatSoft Inc., Cracow, Poland).

Results

Identification and cluster analysis of bacteria in the control, LSIL HPV(+) and HSIL HPV(+) groups

16S rRNA sequence-based methods were used to identify healthy cervical microbial colonies, as well as those associated with HPV-dependent carcinogenesis. The identified microflora were grouped into CSTs as follows: Control, HPV(−); LSIL, HPV(+), and HSIL HPV(+). A total of 6,466 bacteria species, belonging to 74 classes, were identified from the vaginal/cervical swabs of the patients. The major classes observed are presented in Table I.

Table I.

The frequency of bacteria classes in vaginal/cervical swabs.

Table I.

The frequency of bacteria classes in vaginal/cervical swabs.

ClassHealthy (%)LSIL HPV(+) (%)HSIL HPV(+) (%)
Actinobacteria0.211.08.10
Alphaproteobacteria0.200.030.41
Bacilli96.2784.0027.69
Bacterioidia0.010.010.00
Betaproteobacteria0.010.010.01
Clostridia0.090.160.20
Deltaproteobacteria0.000.000.01
Flavobacteriia0.010.000.03
Gammproteobacteria0.198.2061.48
Ktedonobactetria0.010.000.00
Methanomicrobiota0.000.010.00
Mollicutes0.250.030.00
Nostocophycideae0.410.020.15
Sphingobacteria0.000.010.01
Unclassified2.34–2.63

[i] LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Identification and cluster analysis of bacterial classes in the control, LSIL HPV(+) and HSIL HPV(+) groups

Frequency analysis of bacterial classes in the CST healthy women, as well as in patients with a diagnosis of LSIL HPV(+) or HSIL HPV(+) revealed the presence of three major clusters. The results of the bacterial classes cluster analysis are presented in Table II. The bacterial classes, which were distinct from the other classes regardless of the type of diagnosis, included Bacilli, Actinobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria (Table II). Analysis of the frequencies of the individual classes demonstrated that the CST composition in the healthy women, as well as the women diagnosed with LSIL was formed predominantly of the Bacilli bacteria. In CST patients with cancer, the Gammaproteobacteria class was additionally detectable. Further cluster analysis, from classes to species, was performed to determine the bacterial species making up the three selected bacteria classes.

Table II.

Three major clusters of bacteria classes in volunteers and patients with LSIL and HSIL diagnosis.

Table II.

Three major clusters of bacteria classes in volunteers and patients with LSIL and HSIL diagnosis.

ControlLSIL HPV(+)HSIL HPV(+)



ClassGr.Dist.ClassGr.Dist.ClassGr.Dist.
Bacilli10.00Bacilli10.00Bacilli11255.09
Actinobacteria23.01 Gammaproteobacteria10.00 Gammaproteobacteria11255.09
Alphaproteobacteria24.44 Actinobacteria225.94 Actinobacteria20.00
Gammaproteobacteria25.32 Bacteroidia233.90 Alphaproteobacteria323.48
Mollicutes20.38 Clostridia230.74 Bacteroidia32.23
Nostocophycideae213.16 Alphaproteobacteria320.47 Betaproteobacteria31.69
Bacteroidia30.14 Betaproteobacteria32.14 Chrysiogenetes32.48
Betaproteobacteria30.14 Chrysiogenetes32.82 Clostridia311.07
Chrysiogenetes30.50 Deferribacteres32.78 Deferribacteres32.53
Clostridia37.07 Deinococci32.82 Deinococci32.48
Deferribacteres30.50 Deltaproteobacteria32.75 Deltaproteobacteria32.06
Deinococci30.50 Epsilonproteobacteria33.25 Epsilonproteobacteria32.37
Deltaproteobacteria30.50 Erysipelotrichi32.83 Erysipelotrichi32.53
Epsilonproteobacteria30.42 Flavobacteriia32.26 Flavobacteriia31.58
Erysipelotrichi30.50 Fusobacteria32.68 Fusobacteria32.53
Fusobacteria30.34 Ktedonobacteria32.08 Ktedonobacteria32.37
Ktedonobacteria30.30 Methanomicrobia32.56 Methanomicrobia32.48
Methanomicrobia30.42 Mollicutes32.80 Mollicutes37.58
Opitutae30.50 Nostocophycideae333.15 Nostocophycideae311.59
Oscillatoriophycideae30.26 Opitutae32.82 Opitutae32.37
Planctomycetia30.50 Oscillatoriophycideae32.42 Oscillatoriophycideae32.32
Rubrobacteria30.50 Planctomycetia32.80 Planctomycetia32.53
Sphingobacteriia30.26 Rubrobacteria32.82 Rubrobacteria32.53
Synechococcophycideae30,50 Sphingobacteriia32.96 Sphingobacteriia31.43
Synergistia30,50 Synechococcophycideae32.82 Synechococcophycideae32.48
Thermotogae30,50 Synergistia32.82 Synergistia32.53
Flavobacteriia30,06 Thermotogae32.80 Thermotogae32.53

[i] LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Gr., cluster number; Dist., Euclidean.

Identification and cluster analysis of bacterial species in the control, LSIL HPV(+) and HSIL HPV(+) groups

Analysis of the bacteria species in each of the three classes of bacteria revealed no cluster formation within the Gammaproteobacteria class. The further analysis subsequently focussed only on the Actinobacterium and Bacilli classes of bacterial species. Regardless of the type of diagnosis, the bacterial species within the analysed classes formed two clusters. The results are presented in Tables III and IV (data repository).

Table III.

The bacteria species of the class Actinobacterium forming clusters in volunteers and patients with L-SIL or H-SIL histopathological diagnosis. Gr.- cluster number, Dist.- Euclidean distance.

Table III.

The bacteria species of the class Actinobacterium forming clusters in volunteers and patients with L-SIL or H-SIL histopathological diagnosis. Gr.- cluster number, Dist.- Euclidean distance.

ControlL-SILH-SIL



Bacteria speciesDist.Gr.Bacteria speciesDist.Gr.Bacteria speciesDist.Gr.
Gardnerella vaginalis0,001Actinomyces turicensis0,001Gardnerella vaginalis0,001
Propionibacterium acnes0,001Gardnerella vaginalis0,001Corynebacterium glaucum0,081
Actinomyces georgiae0,062Actinomyces georgiae0,042Corynebacterium matruchotii0,081
Actinomyces neuii0,062Actinomyces neuii0,202 Propionibacterium acnes0,321
Actinomyces odontolyticus0,062Actinomyces odontolyticus0,052 Propionibacterium humerusii0,151
Actinomyces turicensis0,062Corynebacterium amycolatum0,042Actinomyces georgiae0,022
Corynebacterium amycolatum0,022Corynebacterium aurimucosum0,082Actinomyces neuii0,022
Corynebacterium aurimucosum0,022Corynebacterium coyleae0,062Actinomyces odontolyticus0,062
Corynebacterium coyleae0,092Corynebacterium diphtheriae0,042Actinomyces turicensis0,022
Corynebacterium diphtheriae0,022Corynebacterium glaucum0,052Corynebacterium amycolatum0,022
Corynebacterium glaucum0,022Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum0,042Corynebacterium aurimucosum0,022
Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum0,062Corynebacterium jeikeium0,042Corynebacterium coyleae0,072
Corynebacterium jeikeium0,062Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii0,042Corynebacterium diphtheriae0,022
Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii0,092Corynebacterium kutscheri0,052Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum0,022
Corynebacterium kutscheri0,252Corynebacterium lipophiloflavum0,052Corynebacterium jeikeium0,0208832
Corynebacterium lipophiloflavum0,022Corynebacterium matruchotii0,132Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii0,022
Corynebacterium matruchotii0,062Corynebacterium mucifaciens0,052Corynebacterium kutscheri0,072
Corynebacterium mucifaciens0,022Corynebacterium pseudogenitalium0,062Corynebacterium lipophiloflavum0,162
Corynebacterium pseudogenitalium0,062Corynebacterium riegelii0,052Corynebacterium mucifaciens0,022
Corynebacterium riegelii0,022Corynebacterium sundsvallense0,052Corynebacterium pseudogenitalium0,022
Corynebacterium sundsvallense0,062Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum0,122Corynebacterium riegelii0,022
Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum0,092Corynebacterium ureicelerivorans0,062Corynebacterium sundsvallense0,062
Corynebacterium ureicelerivorans0,062Corynebacterium variabile0,062Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum0,022
Corynebacterium variabile0,062 Propionibacterium acnes0,622Corynebacterium ureicelerivorans0,022
Propionibacterium avidum0,062 Propionibacterium avidum0,152Corynebacterium variabile0,022
Propionibacterium granulosum0,022 Propionibacterium granulosum0,052 Propionibacterium avidum0,022
Propionibacterium humerusii0,092 Propionibacterium humerusii0,082 Propionibacterium granulosum0,022
Propionibacterium microaerophilum0,022 Propionibacterium microaerophilum0,052 Propionibacterium microaerophilum0,092
Streptomyces lazureus0,062Streptomyces lazureus0,022Streptomyces lazureus0,022

Table IV.

The bacteria species of the class Bacilli forming clusters in volunteers and patients with L-SIL or H-SIL histopathological diagnosis. Gr.- cluster number, Dist.- Euclidean distance.

Table IV.

The bacteria species of the class Bacilli forming clusters in volunteers and patients with L-SIL or H-SIL histopathological diagnosis. Gr.- cluster number, Dist.- Euclidean distance.

ControlL-SILH-SIL



Bacteria speciesDist.Gr.Bacteria speciesDist.Gr.Bacteria speciesDist.Gr.
Lactobacillus crispatus633,171Lactobacillus iners0,001Lactobacillus iners0,001
Lactobacillus iners633,171Lactobacillus acidophilus0,001Lactobacillus acidophilus0,001
Lactobacillus taiwanensis0,001Actinobacillus parahaemolyticus8,192Lactobacillus crispatus0,001
Actinobacillus parahaemolyticus1,432Actinobacillus porcinus8,172Actinobacillus parahaemolyticus3,842
Actinobacillus porcinus1,352Actinobacillus rossii8,172Actinobacillus porcinus3,882
Actinobacillus rossii1,432Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus8,072Actinobacillus rossii3,882
Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus1,192Alkalibacillus salilacus7,302Alkalibacillus haloalkaliphilus3,862
Alkalibacillus salilacus0,472Bacillus alcaliinulinus8,062Alkalibacillus salilacus3,012
Bacillus alcaliinulinus1,112Bacillus anthracis8,192Bacillus alcaliinulinus3,882
Bacillus anthracis1,432Bacillus arbutinivorans8,202Bacillus anthracis3,882
Bacillus arbutinivorans1,432Bacillus aryabhattai8,192Bacillus arbutinivorans3,802
Bacillus aryabhattai1,352Bacillus axarquiensis8,202Bacillus aryabhattai3,782
Bacillus axarquiensis1,352Bacillus azotoformans8,162Bacillus axarquiensis3,882
Bacillus azotoformans1,432Bacillus benzoevorans8,142Bacillus azotoformans3,882
Bacillus benzoevorans1,432Bacillus cereus8,152Bacillus benzoevorans3,882
Bacillus cereus1,4332Bacillus flexus8,182Bacillus cereus3,842
Bacillus flexus1,432Bacillus foraminis8,202Bacillus flexus3,882
Bacillus foraminis1,432Bacillus fordii8,192Bacillus foraminis3,862
Bacillus fordii1,432Bacillus fortis8,192Bacillus fordii3,882
Bacillus fortis1,432Bacillus ginsenggisoli8,162Bacillus fortis3,882
Bacillus ginsenggisoli1,352Bacillus hackensackii8,202Bacillus ginsenggisoli3,882
Bacillus hackensackii1,432Bacillus herbersteinensis8,192Bacillus hackensackii3,862
Bacillus herbersteinensis1,352Bacillus horneckiae8,072Bacillus herbersteinensis3,882
Bacillus horneckiae1,432Bacillus isabeliae8,132Bacillus horneckiae3,862
Bacillus isabeliae1,432Bacillus koreensis8,192Bacillus isabeliae3,882
Bacillus koreensis1,432Bacillus litoralis8,172Bacillus koreensis3,882
Bacillus litoralis1,432Bacillus mucilaginosus8,172Bacillus litoralis3,882
Bacillus mucilaginosus1,272Bacillus oleronius8,172Bacillus mucilaginosus3,782
Bacillus oleronius1,432Bacillus olivae8,202Bacillus oleronius3,882
Bacillus olivae1,272Bacillus oryzae8,152Bacillus olivae3,862
Bacillus oryzae1,432Bacillus pseudomegaterium8,192Bacillus oryzae3,882
Bacillus pseudomegaterium1,352Bacillus sonorensis8,152Bacillus pseudomegaterium3,862
Bacillus sonorensis0,792Bacillus thermoamylovorans8,202Bacillus sonorensis3,882
Bacillus thermoamylovorans1,432Brevibacillus brevis8,202Bacillus thermoamylovorans3,842
Brevibacillus brevis1,352Brevibacillus centrosporus8,142Brevibacillus brevis3,802
Brevibacillus centrosporus1,432Brevibacillus choshinensis8,022Brevibacillus centrosporus3,862
Brevibacillus choshinensis1,432Brevibacillus formosus7,812Brevibacillus choshinensis3,782
Brevibacillus formosus1,272Brevibacillus ginsengisoli7,782Brevibacillus formosus3,502
Brevibacillus ginsengisoli0,952Brevibacillus invocatus8,182Brevibacillus ginsengisoli3,672
Brevibacillus invocatus1,432Brevibacillus limnophilus8,122Brevibacillus invocatus3,862
Brevibacillus limnophilus1,352Brevibacillus panacihumi8,072Brevibacillus limnophilus3,782
Brevibacillus panacihumi0,712Brevibacillus reuszeri8,172Brevibacillus panacihumi3,682
Brevibacillus reuszeri1,432Geobacillus thermoglucosidans8,182Brevibacillus reuszeri3,882
Geobacillus thermoglucosidans1,352Lactobacillus acidifarinae8,172Geobacillus thermoglucosidans3,562
Lactobacillus acidifarinae1,432Lactobacillus amylolyticus8,202Lactobacillus acidifarinae3,882
Lactobacillus acidophilus19,472Lactobacillus antri19,752Lactobacillus amylolyticus3,862
Lactobacillus amylolyticus1,352Lactobacillus apis7,112Lactobacillus antri3,542
Lactobacillus antri1,432Lactobacillus brantae8,172Lactobacillus apis2,782
Lactobacillus apis118,512Lactobacillus camelliae8,122Lactobacillus brantae3,692
Lactobacillus brantae0,712Lactobacillus casei8,182Lactobacillus camelliae3,742
Lactobacillus camelliae0,472Lactobacillus coleohominis8,202Lactobacillus casei3,882
Lactobacillus casei1,432Lactobacillus crispatus721,142Lactobacillus coleohominis1,502
Lactobacillus coleohominis1,432Lactobacillus diolivorans8,202Lactobacillus diolivorans3,862
Lactobacillus diolivorans1,432Lactobacillus equi8,182Lactobacillus equi3,712
Lactobacillus equi1,432Lactobacillus equicursoris8,132Lactobacillus equicursoris3,842
Lactobacillus equicursoris1,432Lactobacillus fabifermentans7,992Lactobacillus fabifermentans3,882
Lactobacillus fabifermentans1,432Lactobacillus faeni7,062Lactobacillus faeni3,272
Lactobacillus faeni0,232Lactobacillus farraginis8,202Lactobacillus farraginis3,862
Lactobacillus farraginis1,432Lactobacillus fermentum8,172Lactobacillus fermentum3,492
Lactobacillus fermentum1,352Lactobacillus frumenti5,832Lactobacillus frumenti3,802
Lactobacillus frumenti1,432Lactobacillus gallinarum22,362Lactobacillus gallinarum16,202
Lactobacillus gallinarum2,232Lactobacillus gasseri5,542Lactobacillus gasseri3,572
Lactobacillus gasseri1,432Lactobacillus gastricus8,202Lactobacillus gastricus3,882
Lactobacillus gastricus1,352Lactobacillus gigeriorum6,922Lactobacillus gigeriorum2,302
Lactobacillus gigeriorum0,552Lactobacillus guizhouensis8,202Lactobacillus guizhouensis3,882
Lactobacillus guizhouensis1,272Lactobacillus hamsteri7,782Lactobacillus hamsteri3,722
Lactobacillus hamsteri0,072Lactobacillus helveticus12,52Lactobacillus helveticus8,652
Lactobacillus helveticus2,382Lactobacillus hilgardii8,202Lactobacillus hilgardii3,702
Lactobacillus hilgardii1,432Lactobacillus ingluviei8,062Lactobacillus ingluviei3,882
Lactobacillus ingluviei1,432Lactobacillus intermedius22,702Lactobacillus intermedius1,782
Lactobacillus intermedius7,402Lactobacillus intestinalis8,022Lactobacillus intestinalis3,732
Lactobacillus intestinalis1,272Lactobacillus japonicus6,422Lactobacillus japonicus3,822
Lactobacillus japonicus1,592Lactobacillus jensenii268,382Lactobacillus jensenii39,952
Lactobacillus jensenii1,432Lactobacillus johnsonii113,222Lactobacillus johnsonii10,032
Lactobacillus johnsonii0,872Lactobacillus kalixensis8,162Lactobacillus kalixensis3,882
Lactobacillus kalixensis1,432Lactobacillus kisonensis8,202Lactobacillus kisonensis3,862
Lactobacillus kisonensis1,432Lactobacillus kitasatonis5,942Lactobacillus kitasatonis0,562
Lactobacillus kitasatonis0,002Lactobacillus letivazi7,742Lactobacillus letivazi3,652
Lactobacillus letivazi1,112Lactobacillus manihotivorans8,202Lactobacillus manihotivorans3,842
Lactobacillus manihotivorans1,432Lactobacillus mucosae8,192Lactobacillus mucosae3,812
Lactobacillus mucosae1,432Lactobacillus oris6,082Lactobacillus oris3,732
Lactobacillus oris1,432Lactobacillus paracasei8,192Lactobacillus paracasei3,882
Lactobacillus paracasei1,352Lactobacillus parafarraginis8,202Lactobacillus parafarraginis3,862
Lactobacillus parafarraginis1,432Lactobacillus parakefiri8,192Lactobacillus parakefiri3,762
Lactobacillus parakefiri1,432Lactobacillus paraplantarum7,972Lactobacillus paraplantarum3,882
Lactobacillus paraplantarum1,432Lactobacillus pentosus8,892Lactobacillus pentosus3,662
Lactobacillus pentosus1,032Lactobacillus plantarum7,782Lactobacillus plantarum3,692
Lactobacillus plantarum1,032Lactobacillus reuteri7,262Lactobacillus reuteri3,882
Lactobacillus reuteri1,432Lactobacillus rhamnosus8,042Lactobacillus rhamnosus3,632
Lactobacillus rhamnosus0,002Lactobacillus ruminis8,202Lactobacillus ruminis3,862
Lactobacillus ruminis1,432Lactobacillus salivarius8,202Lactobacillus salivarius3,772
Lactobacillus salivarius1,432Lactobacillus senmaizukei7,432Lactobacillus senmaizukei3,272
Lactobacillus senmaizukei0,792Lactobacillus siliginis8,112Lactobacillus siliginis3,862
Lactobacillus siliginis1,352Lactobacillus similis8,202Lactobacillus similis3,762
Lactobacillus similis1,432Lactobacillus suebicus8,182Lactobacillus suebicus3,842
Lactobacillus suebicus1,432Lactobacillus taiwanensis477,972Lactobacillus taiwanensis156,772
Lactobacillus thailandensis1,352Lactobacillus thailandensis8,152Lactobacillus thailandensis3,802
Lactobacillus tucceti0,872Lactobacillus tucceti7,802Lactobacillus tucceti3,302
Lactobacillus ultunensis48,752Lactobacillus ultunensis48,092Lactobacillus ultunensis45,052
Lactobacillus vaginalis1,432Lactobacillus vaginalis6,752Lactobacillus vaginalis3,732
Lactobacillus versmoldensis1,352Lactobacillus versmoldensis8,182Lactobacillus versmoldensis3,882
Lactobacillus zeae0,792Lactobacillus zeae8,202Lactobacillus zeae3,862
Lentibacillus kapialis0,472Lentibacillus kapialis7,822Lentibacillus kapialis3,482
Lentibacillus salinarum1,432Lentibacillus salinarum8,152Lentibacillus salinarum3,812
Lysinibacillus boronitolerans1,432Lysinibacillus boronitolerans8,172Lysinibacillus boronitolerans3,882
Lysinibacillus cresolivorans0,872Lysinibacillus cresolivorans8,122Lysinibacillus cresolivorans3,662
Lysinibacillus fusiformis1,352Lysinibacillus fusiformis8,202Lysinibacillus fusiformis3,882
Lysinibacillus parviboronicapiens1,432Lysinibacillus parviboronicapiens8,122Lysinibacillus parviboronicapiens3,782
Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus1,192Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus8,192Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus3,682
Paenibacillus caespitis1,432Paenibacillus caespitis8,202Paenibacillus caespitis3,842
Paenibacillus castaneae1,432Paenibacillus castaneae8,212Paenibacillus castaneae3,842
Paenibacillus cellulosilyticus1,432Paenibacillus cellulosilyticus8,172Paenibacillus cellulosilyticus3,882
Paenibacillus cellulositrophicus1,352Paenibacillus cellulositrophicus8,1852Paenibacillus cellulositrophicus3,862
Paenibacillus cookii1,432Paenibacillus cookii8,172Paenibacillus cookii3,882
Paenibacillus ehimensis1,352Paenibacillus ehimensis8,162Paenibacillus ehimensis3,862
Paenibacillus elgii1,432Paenibacillus elgii8,202Paenibacillus elgii3,862
Paenibacillus filicis1,352Paenibacillus filicis8,212Paenibacillus filicis3,882
Paenibacillus forsythiae1,432Paenibacillus forsythiae8,212Paenibacillus forsythiae3,862
Paenibacillus gansuensis1,432Paenibacillus gansuensis8,212Paenibacillus gansuensis3,862
Paenibacillus ginsengagri1,432Paenibacillus ginsengagri8,172Paenibacillus ginsengagri3,812
Paenibacillus jamilae1,432Paenibacillus jamilae8,212Paenibacillus jamilae3,802
Paenibacillus lactis1,432Paenibacillus lactis8,212Paenibacillus lactis3,862
Paenibacillus macerans1,432Paenibacillus macerans8,172Paenibacillus macerans3,882
Paenibacillus mendelii1,432Paenibacillus mendelii8,212Paenibacillus mendelii3,862
Paenibacillus motobuensis1,432Paenibacillus motobuensis8,142Paenibacillus motobuensis3,882
Paenibacillus naphthalenovorans1,432Paenibacillus naphthalenovorans8,182Paenibacillus naphthalenovorans3,882
Paenibacillus ourofinensis1,032Paenibacillus ourofinensis8,072Paenibacillus ourofinensis3,842
Paenibacillus panacisoli1,432Paenibacillus panacisoli8,172Paenibacillus panacisoli3,812
Paenibacillus pini1,352Paenibacillus pini8,202Paenibacillus pini3,882
Paenibacillus pocheonensis1,432Paenibacillus pocheonensis8,202Paenibacillus pocheonensis3,862
Paenibacillus polymyxa1,432Paenibacillus polymyxa8,202Paenibacillus polymyxa3,802
Paenibacillus residui1,432Paenibacillus residui8,182Paenibacillus residui3,882
Paenibacillus vortex1,432Paenibacillus vortex8,172Paenibacillus vortex3,882
Paenibacillus woosongensis1,112Paenibacillus woosongensis8,072Paenibacillus woosongensis3,712
Paenibacillus xinjiangensis1,432Paenibacillus xinjiangensis8,192Paenibacillus xinjiangensis3,802
Pontibacillus halophilus1,272Pontibacillus halophilus8,022Pontibacillus halophilus3,682
Pontibacillus marinus1,352Pontibacillus marinus8,192Pontibacillus marinus3,882
Streptococcus agalactiae1,112Streptococcus agalactiae97,052Streptococcus agalactiae3,652
Streptococcus alactolyticus1,432Streptococcus alactolyticus8,182Streptococcus alactolyticus3,882
Streptococcus anginosus1,272Streptococcus anginosus10,852Streptococcus anginosus25,552
Streptococcus australis1,432Streptococcus australis8,162Streptococcus australis3,882
Streptococcus bovis1,272Streptococcus bovis7,462Streptococcus bovis3,842
Streptococcus cristatus1,432Streptococcus cristatus8,172Streptococcus cristatus3,81862
Streptococcus fryi1,352Streptococcus fryi8,072Streptococcus fryi3,802
Streptococcus gallinaceus1,432Streptococcus gallinaceus8,202Streptococcus gallinaceus3,802
Streptococcus gordonii1,432Streptococcus gordonii8,192Streptococcus gordonii3,882
Streptococcus infantis1,432Streptococcus infantis7,962Streptococcus infantis3,802
Streptococcus intermedius1,432Streptococcus intermedius8,152Streptococcus intermedius3,882
Streptococcus macedonicus1,432Streptococcus macedonicus7,972Streptococcus macedonicus3,882
Streptococcus milleri1,352Streptococcus milleri8,082Streptococcus milleri19,662
Streptococcus mutans1,432Streptococcus mutans7,982Streptococcus mutans3,882
Streptococcus oligofermentans1,432Streptococcus oligofermentans8,132Streptococcus oligofermentans3,882
Streptococcus oralis1,432Streptococcus oralis8,092Streptococcus oralis3,802
Streptococcus orisratti1,432Streptococcus orisratti10,782Streptococcus orisratti3,842
Streptococcus parasanguinis1,432Streptococcus parasanguinis8,182Streptococcus parasanguinis3,882
Streptococcus pasteuri1,432Streptococcus pasteuri8,182Streptococcus pasteuri3,882
Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae1,272Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae7,732Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae3,882
Streptococcus sanguinis1,432Streptococcus sanguinis8,192Streptococcus sanguinis3,862
Streptococcus thermophilus1,352Streptococcus thermophilus8,202Streptococcus thermophilus3,882
Streptococcus tigurinus1,352Streptococcus tigurinus7,822Streptococcus tigurinus3,782
Streptococcus vestibularis1,272Streptococcus vestibularis8,032Streptococcus vestibularis3,472
Ureibacillus thermophilus1,432Ureibacillus thermophilus8,192Ureibacillus thermophilus3,862
Virgibacillus byunsanensis1,432Virgibacillus byunsanensis8,202Virgibacillus byunsanensis3,862
Virgibacillus salexigens1,432Virgibacillus salexigens8,202Virgibacillus salexigens3,842
Viridibacillus arvi0,872Viridibacillus arvi8,182Viridibacillus arvi3,672
Viridibacillus neidei1,352Viridibacillus neidei8,182Viridibacillus neidei3,882

The Actinobacterium class included Gardnerella vaginalis and Propionibacterium acnes identified in the CST healthy women; Gardnerella vaginalis and Actinomyces turicensis in the CST women diagnosed with LSIL, and Gardnerella vaginalis, Corynebacterium glaucum, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Propionibacterium acnes and Propionibacterium humerusii in women diagnosed with HSIL, which formed clusters separate from the other bacterial species (Table III, data repository).

The cluster analysis of the Bacilli bacterial species revealed the presence of a CST subpopulation, which in the healthy women consisted of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis. In women diagnosed with LSIL it included Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus acidophilus, and in women diagnosed with HSIL it included Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus crispatus (Table IV, data repository). For further analysis, the levels of bacterial characteristics were determined in each of the analysed patient groups (Table V).

Table V.

Analysis of the selected bacteria species frequency in control, LSIL and HSIL diagnosed patients. Frequencies >10 have been highlighted.

Table V.

Analysis of the selected bacteria species frequency in control, LSIL and HSIL diagnosed patients. Frequencies >10 have been highlighted.

SpeciesControlLSILHSIL
Actinomyces turicensis00.630
Corynebacterium glaucum0.0800.19
Corynebacterium matruchotti00.070.19
Gardnerella vaginalis11.4746.93304.49
Lactobacillus acidophilus20.871273.621193.89
Lactobacillus crispatus2506.01405.03245.87
Lactobacillus iners3772.353183.671217.21
Lactobacillus taiwanensis320.69410.57116.49
Propionibacterium acnes0.880.420.48
Propionibacterium humerusii0.160.130.14

The analysis of the bacterial classes indicated that CST cervical swabs of the female patients were colonised by Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis, however, Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus were almost not identified. In the CST patients diagnosed with LSIL, the predominant types of bacteria were Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus iners, while Lactobacillus crispatus frequency was lower than in the control group. In CST patients diagnosed with HSIL, high abundance of Gardnerella vaginalis, Lactobacillus acidophilus was identified, however, Lactobacillus taiwanensis, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus crispatus frequencies were lower than in the control group. The level of Lactobacillus acidophilus in the CST patients diagnosed with LSIL swabs were compared with swabs taken from women with HSIL.

Discussion

It has been indicated that the introduction of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) into research allowed for the identification of specific ecological niches for microorganisms within living organisms. This was possible due to the amplification and parallel sequencing of gene fragments, which were highly conserved among microorganisms, the most common being the 16S rRNA subunit, as well as RAD51 recombinase and inhibin subunit a (12). Highly conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene (V1-V9) have been reported to allow for phylogenetic and taxonomic characterisation of the analysed microbial communities (12). In the present study, the V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA were used, which allowed for the identification of 3 CSTs of HSIL HPV(+), LSIL HPV(+) and the healthy group HPV(−).

In addition, >70 classes of bacteria were identified and the analysis of their frequencies demonstrated that cervical swabs of flora obtained from the volunteers and women diagnosed with LSIL HPV(+) were predominantly composed of the Bacilli class. The presence of Gammaproteobacteria and Actinobacterium classes in patients with HSIL HPV(+) were also detected. Further analysis revealed no cluster formation within the Gammaproteobacteria class and, therefore, this class was excluded from the present study.

Further analysis focussed only on the Actinobacterium and Bacilli classes of bacterial species. Regardless of the type of diagnosis, the bacterial species within the analysed classes only formed two clusters. It was observed that swabs from healthy women were characterised by an increased level of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis. However, Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus were absent. In the CST patients diagnosed with LSIL HPV(+) the predominant types of bacteria were Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus iners, and there was no presence of Lactobacillus crispatus detected. The CST cervical swabs obtained from women with HSIL HPV(+) were rich in Gardnerella vaginalis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, while Lactobacillus taiwanensis, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus crispatus were not detected. However, similar levels of Lactobacillus acidophilus were identified in the control and LSIL HPV(+) groups.

In the majority of healthy women in the present study, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis were the dominant cervical microbiota. According to previous studies, these species were also reported to be dominant in the vaginal microbiota of Asian women (6,13). The women with the highest risk of HSIL HPV(+) indicated low levels of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis. It has been reported that hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacilli are present in 96% of women with a normal vaginal bacterial community (4). In addition, species in the Lactobacillus genus have been reported to maintain a low pH by producing lactic acid (4). It has been reported that Lactobacillus crispatus was associated with a low vaginal pH compared with Lactobacillus iners, suggesting that these two species differ in ecological function (14). The cervical swabs obtained from healthy women consisted mainly of Lactobacillus bacteria. Due to their presence, the physiological pH value (3.6–4.5) was achieved by fermentation of epithelial glycogen. In addition, it has been reported that Lactobacillus bacteria have a high adherence potential, which allows them to adhere tightly to the vaginal epithelium and cover its surface, protecting the vagina from colonisation by pathogenic microorganisms (1517). A number of Lactobacillus species can form biofilms and produce bacteriocins and hydrogen peroxide, which together have been reported to inhibit the development of undesirable anaerobes in the vagina (15,16). Lactobacillus iners has been previously reported to become a predominant part of the microbial community in the vaginal microbiota transition between abnormal and normal states (17). HPV infection can alter the mucosal metabolism and host immunity, and can induce changes in the vaginal microbiota (18).

It has been reported that microbe-induced inflammation can contribute to cervical cancer by stimulating the production of specific cytokines and chemokines, which promote proliferation and/or inhibit apoptosis (18,19). Microbiota have been demonstrated to increase, as well as decrease susceptibility to HPV infection (18,19). An association between vaginal microbiota and HPV infection was previously described by Gao et al (19). They observed a significant presence of Lactobacillus species, including Lactobacillus gallinarum, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus gasseri in all women as well as Lactobacillus gasseri and Gardnerella vaginalis in HPV(+) women. The reduced population of the Lactobacillus species and the presence of Fusobacteria species in HPV(+) patients was also observed by Lee et al (6). The present study demonstrated that bacterial communities in the cervix are more complex than previously thought. The analyses suggest an association between HPV infection and decreased abundance of Lactobacillus species and increased abundance of Gammaproteobacteria anaerobes. The aforementioned results are similar to those reported by Lee et al (6) and Dareng et al (8). The changes to the ‘core microbiome’ may be associated with changes in human health and risk of exposure to HPV infection and cervical cancer development.

In summary, analysis of the association between the occurrence of bacterial species and the histopathological diagnosis in the analysed population revealed that the vaginal microbiota may be clustered into two groups. Cluster 1 was predominantly affected by Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis and Cluster 2 predominated by Gardnerella vaginalis. The frequency of Lactobacillus acidophilus was identical in the clustered groups. The proposed mechanism of a cervical cancer formation may start with a sexually transmitted carcinogenic HPV infection (Fig. 1).

The fastest rate of HPV clearance may occur in women with Cluster 1 bacteria as the dominant microbiota as >50% of all infections were cleared within a year. The lowest clearance rate may occur in women classified with Cluster 2 dominant microbiota. In the aforementioned patients the chance of HSIL(+) development gradually increases, representing the growth of a clonal high-grade lesion up to a number of years following HPV infection. It was recently demonstrated that Gardnerella vaginalis, a dominant Cluster 2 bacterium, was able to adhere to and displace precoated protective Lactobacilli from vaginal epithelial cells, while other BV-associated anaerobes, including Atopobium vaginae, were less virulent (20).

The findings of the present study demonstrated a possible interaction between bacterial flora and HPV infection, as well as an association between this interaction and clinical cervical neoplasia. It was observed that bacterial dysbiosis, characterized by a predominance of Gardnerella vaginalis and a concomitant paucity of Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus taiwanensis, may be an HPV-dependent cofactor for cervical neoplasia development. However, without continuous observation it is difficult to confirm that microbiota dysbiosis contributes to HPV infection and carcinogenesis. Future researches are required to confirm the results of 16S rRNA sequencing and determine that microflora dysbiosis may be associated with HPV-induced cervical carcinogenicity.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was funded by grants from the Medical University of Lublin (Lublin, Poland; grant nos., DS 120, DS 128 and MB 128).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The datasets presented in Tables III and IV can be found online at the following webpages: http://www.katbiolkom.ump.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/table_III.docx and http://www.katbiolkom.ump.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/table_IV.doc × (The repository of the University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland).

Authors' contributions

WK conceived the study, collected samples, wrote the materials and methods and edited the manuscript. MWC analyzed the data and wrote the results and discussion sections. JK conceived the study, collected samples and contributed resources. DK performed laboratory assays. WW conceived the study, prepared figures and wrote background information. AK conceived the study, collected samples, contributed resources and approved the final draft. AGJ conceived the study, contributed resources, collected samples and approved the final draft.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The investigations were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lublin (Lublin, Poland; Resolution of the Bioethics Committee; approval no: 0254/30/2002. Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals, and the research was performed by the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.

Patient consent for publication

Study participants provided written informed consent for the publication of any data and associated images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Wheeler CM: The natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infections and cervical cancer: Gaps in knowledge and future horizons. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 40:165–76. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Oh HY, Kim BS, Seo SS, Kong JS, Lee JK, Park SY, Hong KM, Kim HK and Kim MK: The association of uterine cervical microbiota with an increased risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Korea. Clin Microbiol Infect. 21:674.e1–e9. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Polatti F: Bacterial vaginosis, Atopobium vaginae and nifuratel. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 7:36–40. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Nam H, Whang K and Lee Y: Analysis of vaginal lactic acid producing bacteria in healthy women. J Microbiol. 45:515–520. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Hillier SL, Critchlow CW, Stevens CE, Roberts MC, Wolner-Hanssen P, Eschenbach DA and Holmes KK: Microbiological, epidemiological and clinical correlates of vaginal colonisation by Mobiluncus species. Genitourin Med. 67:26–31. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Lee JE, Lee S, Lee H, Song YM, Lee K, Han MJ, Sung J and Ko G: Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLoS One. 8:e635142013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Gillet E, Meys JF, Verstraelen H, Bosire C, De Sutter P, Temmerman M and Broeck DV: Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: A meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 11:102011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Dareng EO, Ma B, Famooto AO, Akarolo-Anthony SN, Offiong RA, Olaniyan O, Dakum PS, Wheeler CM, Fadrosh D, Yang H, et al: Prevalent high-risk HPV infection and vaginal microbiota in Nigerian women. Epidemiol Infect. 144:123–137. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cerval/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: Developed and approved at the National Cancer Institute workshop in Bethesda, MD, December 12-13, 1988. Diagn Cytopathol. 5:331–334. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Manos MM, Ting Y, Wright DK, Lewis AJ, Broker TR and Wolinsky SM: The use of polymerase chain reaction amplification for the detection of genital human papilloma viruses. Cancer Cell. 7:209–214. 1989.

11 

Fadrosh DW, Ma B, Gajer P, Sengamalay N, Ott S, Brotman RM and Ravel J: An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome. 2:62014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Wu D, Wu M, Halpern A, Rusch DB, Yooseph S, Frazier M, Venter JC and Eisen JA: Stalking the fourth domain in metagenomic data: Searching for, discovering, and interpreting novel, deep branches in marker gene phylogenetic trees. PLoS One. 6:e180112011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, et al: Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:4680–4687. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Hummelen R, Fernandes AD, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Changalucha J, Gloor GB and Reid G: Deep sequencing of the vaginal microbiota of women with HIV. PLoS One. 5:e120782010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Petricevic L, Domig KJ, Nierscher FJ, Sandhofer MJ, Fidesser M, Krondorfer I, Husslein P, Kneifel W and Kiss H: Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Sci Rep. 4:51362014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Marchesi JR, Lee YS, Bennett PR and Kyrgiou M: The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: What do we know and where are we going next? Microbiome. 4:582016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Jakobsson T and Forsum U: Lactobacillus iners: A marker of changes in the vaginal flora? J Clin Microbiol. 45:31452007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Scott M, Stites DP and Moscicki AB: Th1 cytokine patterns in cervical human papillomavirus infection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 6:751–755. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Gao W, Weng J, Gao Y and Chen X: Comparison of the vaginal microbiota diversity of women with and without human papillomavirus infection: A cross-sectional study. BMC Infec Dis. 13:2712013. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F and Raoult D: Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis. 47:33–43. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2018
Volume 16 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kwasniewski W, Wolun‑Cholewa M, Kotarski J, Warchol W, Kuzma D, Kwasniewska A and Gozdzicka‑Jozefiak A: Microbiota dysbiosis is associated with HPV‑induced cervical carcinogenesis. Oncol Lett 16: 7035-7047, 2018.
APA
Kwasniewski, W., Wolun‑Cholewa, M., Kotarski, J., Warchol, W., Kuzma, D., Kwasniewska, A., & Gozdzicka‑Jozefiak, A. (2018). Microbiota dysbiosis is associated with HPV‑induced cervical carcinogenesis. Oncology Letters, 16, 7035-7047. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9509
MLA
Kwasniewski, W., Wolun‑Cholewa, M., Kotarski, J., Warchol, W., Kuzma, D., Kwasniewska, A., Gozdzicka‑Jozefiak, A."Microbiota dysbiosis is associated with HPV‑induced cervical carcinogenesis". Oncology Letters 16.6 (2018): 7035-7047.
Chicago
Kwasniewski, W., Wolun‑Cholewa, M., Kotarski, J., Warchol, W., Kuzma, D., Kwasniewska, A., Gozdzicka‑Jozefiak, A."Microbiota dysbiosis is associated with HPV‑induced cervical carcinogenesis". Oncology Letters 16, no. 6 (2018): 7035-7047. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9509