Pancreatic cancer cell apoptosis is induced by a proteoglycan extracted from Ganoderma lucidum
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 12, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12295
- Article Number: 34
-
Copyright: © Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor of the digestive system. In the United States, in 2018, an estimated 56,770 cases of pancreatic cancer occurred, and 45,750 patients succumbed to the disease (1). Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal types of cancer, for its mortality rates closely parallels its incidence rates (2). Most patients have obvious symptoms, particularly in the advanced stage of pancreatic cancer (2). Gemcitabine is a widely used drug for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, to improve the surgical success ratio. However, its serious side effects attenuate its efficacy, and cause harm to patients (3). Therefore, it is crucial to identify an efficacious drug, with fewer serious side effects, for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Ganoderma lucidum is a Traditional Chinese Medicine. Several biological activities and pharmacological functions of polysaccharides, proteins, and triterpenoids, found in Ganoderma lucidum, have been reported, including the defense of tumors, management of blood sugar levels, modulation of immunity, and protection of hepatocytes (4). In our previous study a proteoglycan, Fudan-Yueyang Ganoderma lucidum (FYGL) was extracted from the Ganoderma lucidum fruiting body (5). FYGL is composed of both proteins and polysaccharides, and its molecular weight is 2.6×105. FYGL is an amphiphilic hyperbranched proteoglycan consisting of hydrophilic polysaccharides (4 saccharide units) and lipophilic protein moieties (17 amino acids), with a saccharide:protein ratio of 77:17 (6). Our previous study demonstrated that, FYGL could efficiently and safely manage blood sugar levels in vivo, and affect multiple signaling pathways for insulin regulation (5,7,8).
Oxidative stress is crucial for both anticancer effects and cancer development (9). Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) can damage the cancer cell structures, including lipids, proteins, and DNA, resulting in cancer cell death, apoptosis and autophagy (10,11). Furthermore, high levels of ROS, and the resultant oxidative damage, can decrease the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), leading to cancer cell death (12,13). However, the production of ROS by mammalian mitochondria has been associated with multiple pathologies, including neurodegenerative diseases (14), diabetes (15), cancer (16) and premature aging (17). Therefore, the regulation of ROS at a suitable concentration in the body is crucial for maintaining health. In addition, the autophagy of cancer cells is a catabolic pathway for supporting metabolism in response to starvation, and for removing damaged proteins and organelles in response to stress (18). Autophagy maintains mitochondrial metabolic function, which is beneficial for the growth of aggressive cancers (19); however, pharmacological inhibition of autophagy can cause the accumulation of defective mitochondria, and consequently lead to metabolomic issues (20). Cell autophagy is essential for pancreatic cancer activity and it has been found that inhibition of autophagy in cancer cells through genetically and pharmacologically increasing ROS; therefore, damaging DNA, is an alternative method of inducing apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells (21,22).
In the present study, the anti-pancreatic cancer ability of FYGL was investigated and to compare its selectivity in 3 different pancreatic cancer cell lines (PANC-1, BxPC-3 and Mia PaCa-2), as well as in the HepG2 hepatic cell line. In addition, the effect of FYGL on cell migration, colony formation, ROS production, and cell autophagy were also investigated. The results indicated that FYGL was effective at inducing apoptosis in the PANC-1 cells, by increasing ROS and inhibiting autophagy.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and reagents
FYGL was extracted from Ganderma lucidum in our laboratory (5). The human pancreatic cancer cell line, PANC-1, and the human liver cancer cell line, HepG2, were obtained from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd., while the human pancreatic cancer cell line, Mia PaCa-2, was donated by Professor Wuli Yang (Fudan University, Shanghai, China). The human pancreatic cancer cell line, BxPC-3, was donated by Doctor Yiqun Ma (Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China). The PANC-1, Mia PaCa-2 and HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The BxPC-3 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The following antibodies: Caspase-3 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 9662S), cleaved-caspase-3 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 9661S), Bcl-2 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 4223S), P62 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 39749S), LC3A/B (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 12741S), β-actin (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 4970S), GAPDH (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 5174S), and HRP-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit (dilution 1:2,000; cat. no. 7074S) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Inc.
Cell viability assay
The cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, at a density of 5×104 cells/well. After 24 h, the cells in each well were treated with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–1,000 µg/ml, and gemcitabine (Eli Lilly and Company) as a positive control at a concentration range of 5–20 µM for 24 and 48 h, then, 10 µl Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) reagent (Shanghai Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) was added into each well. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm, using a microplate reader (Cytation 3; BioTek Instruments, Inc.), 1–4 h later.
Confocal microscopy analysis
The cells were seeded in cell culture dishes (Wuxi NEST Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) at a density of 1×105 cells/well at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. After treatment with 0 (control) and 150 µg/ml FYGL, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min at 37°C, then permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.). FYGL was stained with a green fluorescent agent, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), and the cell nucleus and cytoskeleton were stained with a blue fluorescent agent, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and a red fluorescent agent, rhodamine-labeled phalloidin (all from Shanghai Yeasen Biotech Co., Ltd.), respectively for 10 min at 37°C. Images were obtained using a laser scanning confocal microscope (magnification, ×100; LSCM; Nikon C2+; Nikon Corporation).
Wound healing assay
The cells were seeded (5×105 cells/well) in 6-well plates at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, and the cell monolayer was scratched with a pipette tip when the cells grew to a single layer. Following which, the cells were treated with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–1,000 µg/ml in DMEM medium with 3% FBS for 48 h. Cell images were obtained using an inverted optical microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE Ts2; Nikon Corporation) to observe the migration of the cells across the wound (magnification, ×4). ImageJ software (v1.51j8; National Institutes of Health) was used for digital analysis of the wound healing area.
Colony viability assay
The cells were seeded in 6-well culture plates at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, at a density of 200 cells/well and incubated for 24 h. Then, the cells in each well were treated with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–1,000 µg/ml for 12 days. All colonies were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min at 37°C, and washed with PBS (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.) subsequently, the cells in each well were stained with a purple dye, giemsa (Shanghai Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 10 min at 37°C. Cell images were obtained using an optical camera (magnification, ×1; Sony α6400; Sony Corporation).
Cell apoptosis assay
The percentage of apoptotic cells was determined using an Annexin V-FITC/PI kit (Shanghai Yeasen Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.). Cells were seeded in 6-well plates, at a density of 5×105 cells/well. After incubation for 24 h, the cells were treated with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–500 µg/ml for 24 h and harvested using 0.25% trypsin (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.), then the cells were incubated with 5 µl Annexin V-FITC and 10 µl PI working solution for 30 min at 37°C. Finally, the stained cells were analyzed using flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter, Inc.), and the data were analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10.4; BD Biosciences).
Measurement of intracellular ROS levels
The fluorescent agent, 2,7-dichlorodi-hydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; Shanghai Yeasen Biotech Co., Ltd.) was used to investigate ROS production. The cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, at a density of 5×105 cells/well. After incubation for 24 h, the cells were treated with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–500 µg/ml for 24 h. Following which, the cells were washed with PBS and added to 1 ml serum-free medium with 10 µl DCFH-DA per well. After incubation for 30 min at 37°C, the level of ROS in the cells were identified using DCFH, and analyzed using flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter, Inc.), and the data were analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10.4; BD Biosciences).
Analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential
The cells were seeded in cell culture dishes at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, at a density of 1×105 cells/well and incubated for 24 h, then, the cells were treated with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–1,000 µg/ml for 24 h. The medium was removed and the cells were washed with PBS, then stained with 10 µl rhodamine 123 (Rh-123; a green fluorescent agent; 5 mg/ml; Shanghai Yeasen Biotech Co. Ltd.) for 30 min in the dark at 37°C, to detect the mitochondrial membrane potential. Following which, the cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min at 37°C, and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100. Subsequently, the cell nucleus and cytoskeleton were stained blue with DAPI and red with rhodamine-labeled phalloidin for 10 min at 37°C, respectively. Images were taken by LSCM (magnification, ×60; Nikon C2+, Nikon Corporation).
Detection of autophagy
The cells were seeded in cell culture dishes at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, at a density of 1×105 cells/well then, treated with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–1,000 µg/ml for 24 h. After washing with PBS three times, the cells were incubated with a Cyto-ID autophagy detection kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.) for 30 min at 37°C, which including a mitochondrial staining reagent Cyto-ID and nuclear staining reagent Hoechst 33258, subsequently were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min at 37°C. Images were obtained using LSCM (magnification, ×60; Nikon C2+; Nikon Corporation).
Western blot analysis
Total protein was lysed from the cells using a RIPA containing phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, then the concentration was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (all from Shanghai Yeasen Biotech Co., Ltd.). Following which, the lysed proteins were separated using a 10–15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The membranes were blocked with a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, and 5% skimmed milk (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), then incubated with the primary antibodies for 12 h at 4°C, followed by incubation with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at 25°C. The antibodies were detected using a super enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagent (Shanghai Yeasen Biotech Co., Ltd.) and a chemiluminescent imaging system (Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). GAPDH and β-actin were used as the loading controls.
Imaging mCherry-green fluorescent protein-LC3B (mCherry-GFP-LC3) fusion protein
The adenovirus expressing (Ad)-mCherry-GFP-LC3 fusion protein (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was used to investigate the binding of autophagosomes and lysosomes. The PANC-1 cell line was transfected with ad-mCherry-GFP-LC3 adenovirus, at 20 multiplicity of infection for 24 h at 37°C. Then, the culture medium was removed and fresh DMEM with FYGL at a concentration range of 0–500 µg/ml was added. After 24 h, the cells were detected with LSCM (magnification, ×60; Nikon C2+; Nikon Corporation).
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). SPSS software (v20.0; IBM Corp.) was used for statistical analyses. ImageJ software (v1.51j8; National Institutes of Health) was used for digital analysis of the western blots. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare the mean values among multiple groups followed by Tukey's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell viability by FYGL
To investigate the effects of FYGL on the viability of 2 different cancer cell lines, three pancreatic cancer cell lines, PANC-1, BxPC-3, and Mia PaCa-2, and one hepatic cell line, HepG2, were treated with FYGL, at a concentration range of 50–1,000 µg/ml, with gemcitabine, as a positive control, at a concentration range of 5–20 µM. All the cell lines were treated for 24 (Fig. 1A) and 48 h (Fig. 1B), then the viability was investigated using a CCK-8 assay. The results indicated that FYGL had different effects on cell viability in the 2 different cancer cell lines. The viability of PANC-1 and BxPC-3 cells was markedly decreased by the treatment of FYGL in a dose dependent manner at both 24 and 48 h, comparable with the cells treated with the positive agent, gemcitabine. The viability of the Mia PaCa-2 cells was not affected by FYGL treatment in a dose dependent manner, both at 24 and 48 h. As well as in HepG2 cells, however, gemcitabine was markedly toxic for all the cell lines following treatment for 48 h. The results, therefore, indicated that FYGL was moderate, safe, and selective for the given cell lines.
FYGL absorption in cells
To understand the functional mechanism of FYGL in the cells, the PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cell lines were selected for further research. First, the absorption of FYGL into the cells was investigated. The FYGL, cell nucleus, and cytoskeleton were all labeled with fluorescent agents namely: FITC (green), DAPI (blue), and rhodamine-labeled phalloidin (red). As shown in Fig. 2, the green fluorescence from FYGL overlapped with the red fluorescence from the cytoskeleton. Furthermore, some green fluorescent areas were found between the red and the blue fluorescent areas (from the nucleus labelled with DAPI), indicating that FYGL was encapsulated by vesicles and dispersed into the cytoplasm. Some green fluorescent areas were found to be outside of the cells, indicating not all of the FYGL was absorbed into the cells; however, most of the FYGL was absorbed in the cells.
Effects of FYGL on cell migration and colony formation
Cell migration in cell treated with FYGL was determined using a wound healing assay. Both PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cells were treated with FYGL for 48 h. The cell migration of PANC-1 cells into the wound area was halted by the increased concentrations of FYGL (Fig. 3A). The wound healing percentage of PANC-1 cells significantly decreased at 250, 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL compared with that in the control group (Fig. 3B). However, the wound healing percentage of Mia PaCa-2 cells increased at 250 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL and decreased at 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL, but no significant differences were observed compared with that in the control group, which indicated that cell migration was not affected by FYGL in the Mia PaCa-2 cells (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3D and E showed the colony formation of the PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cells treated with different concentrations of FYGL. A total of 200 cells, in each well, were incubated with FYGL for 12 days. The colony formation of the PANC-1 cells was low at higher concentrations, indicating sensitivity to FYGL treatment, while there was a high number of colonies with the Mia PaCa-2 cell line indicating insensitivity to FYGL treatment.
Effects of FYGL on apoptosis of the pancreatic cancer cells
Apoptosis of cancer cells is a critical index for an anticancer drug (23), and is typically investigated using an Annexin V-FITC/PI kit and measured using flow cytometry (24). The apoptotic rate of the PANC-1 cells increased to 23%, as the concentration of FYGL increased to 500 µg/ml (Fig. 4A), however, the apoptotic rate of Mia PaCa-2 cells was unaffected (Fig. 4B).
Furthermore, western blot analysis was used to analyze the expression levels of key proteins for example, caspase-3, Bcl-2 and cleaved-caspase-3, which are involved in apoptosis. The production of cleaved caspase-3 from caspase-3 promotes cell apoptosis, while the expression level of Bcl-2 prevents the cells from undergoing apoptosis (25,26). Fig. 5A shows that the protein expression levels of caspase-3 and Bcl-2 in the PANC-1 cells significantly decreased at 250, 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL compared with that in the control group, while Fig. 5B shows that the protein expression level of cleaved-caspase-3 in the PANC-1 cells was significantly increased, at 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL, compared with that in the control group. The results indicated that cell apoptosis in the PANC-1 cells was induced by FYGL.
However, Fig. 5C and D demonstrated that the protein expression levels of caspase-3 in the Mia PaCa-2 cells decreased at 50 and 100 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL and increased at 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL, but no significant differences were observed compared with that in the control group. The protein expression levels of Bcl-2 in the Mia PaCa-2 cells increased at 50, 100 and 500 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL, but no significant differences were observed compared with that in the control group. The protein expression levels of cleaved-caspase-3 in the Mia PaCa-2 cells increased at 50 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL and decreased at 250, 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL, but no significant differences were observed compared with that in the control group. These results indicated that FYGL does not induce Mia PaCa-2 cell apoptosis.
FYGL effects on oxidative stress and MMP
The fluorescent probe, DCFH-DA was used to detect ROS in the cells using flow cytometry. Fig. 6A showed that the ROS level in the PANC-1 cells significantly increased as the concentration of FYGL increased from 0 to 500 µg/ml; however, there was no increase in the Mia PaCa-2 cells (Fig. 6B). The decrease of MMP has been associated with the increase of ROS, and with cell apoptosis (11,27).
Therefore, in the subsequent experiments, the green fluorescent agent, Rh-123 was used to detect the MMP in the PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cell lines, treated with FYGL for 24 h and analyzed using confocal microscopy. Fig. 7A and B showed the fluorescent images of the PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cell lines, respectively; wherein blue, green, and red represent the cell nucleus (DAPI), MMP (Rh-23), and cytoskeleton (rhodamine-labeled phalloidin), respectively. The MMP was found to be deceased in the PANC-1 cells, as the concentrations of FYGL increased; however, there was no marked change in the Mia PaCa-2 cells, which were consistent with the results from the ROS experiments. The results indicated that FYGL could selectively induce the production of ROS, leading to the reduction of the MMP and apoptosis in the PANC-1 cells line.
Effects of FYGL on autophagy of the pancreatic cancer cells
The cell autophagy process occurs from autophagosome formation, along with organelle damage, to the movement of autophagosomes into lysosomes for the recycling of damaged organelles (18). The polyubiquitinated protein, LC3-I/II, and the polyubiquitin-binding protein, P62, are autophagic effector proteins. During the cell autophagy process, LC3-I is covalently bound to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) to form LC3-II, which then localizes on the autophagosome membrane (28). Once the autophagy process has been completed, the P62 protein is degraded, and the autophagosomes enter the lysosomes (29). Fig. 8A showed that the autophagosomes, labeled with the green fluorescent agent, cyto-ID, increased, as the concentration of FYGL increased, in the PANC-1 cells treated with FYGL for 24 h, suggesting that FYGL promoted autophagosome formation in the PANC-1 cell line. FYGL had almost no effect on the fluorescence intensity in the Mia PaCa-2 cell line, indicating that FYGL did not induce autophagosome formation in the Mia PaCa-2 cell line (Fig. 8B).
Fig. 9A and B showed the protein expression level of LC3-I/II and P62 in the PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cells, respectively, treated with different concentrations of FYGL for 24 h. In the PANC-1 cells, the cascade protein ratio of LC3-I/II significantly decreased at 50, 100, 250, 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL compared with that in the control group further indicating that there was an increase in the number of autophagosomes in the PANC-1 cells. However, it was found that in the PANC-1 cells treated with different concentrations of FYGL, the relative protein expression level of P62 was significantly increased, at 500 and 1,000 µg/ml compared with that in the control group, indicating that the cell autophagy process was halted, and not completed in the signaling pathway. In the Mia PaCa-2 cell line, the ratio of LC3-I/II decreased at 50, 250, 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL and increased at 100 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL, but no significant differences were observed compared with that in the control group. The protein expression levels of P62 in the Mia PaCa-2 cells increased at 500 and 1,000 µg/ml concentrations of FYGL, but no significant differences were observed compared with that in the control group. These results indicated that FYGL had almost no effect on the autophagy of Mia PaCa-2 cells.
In addition, the fluorescent adenovirus, ad-mCherry-GFP-LC3 was used to confirm that the autophagosomes enter the lysosomes. When the ad-mCherry-GFP-LC3 adenovirus, bound to the autophagosomes, are present in the lysosomes of cells, the GFP in the fusion protein is quenched. Fig. 9C shows the fluorescence images of the PANC-1 cells infected with Ad-mCherry-GFP-LC3 and treated with (500 µg/ml) or without (control) FYGL for 24 h. It was found that the fluorescent intensity of GFP in FYGL-treated cells was markedly higher compared with that in the control cells, suggesting that FYGL prevented autophagosomes from entering the lysosomes.
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that FYGL could promote cell apoptosis in the PANC-1 cell line, but not in the Mia PaCa-2 cell line. The Bcl-2 protein is one of the most important anti-apoptotic proteins, and prevents the loss of MMP (26). ROS can damage lipids, proteins, DNA, and organelles, leading to cell apoptosis (12). Numerous studies (30–34) have found that drugs, such as Berberine, BML-275 and Resveratrol could induce apoptosis of the PANC-1 and MiaPaCa-2 cell lines via ROS production, without selectivity, indicating that ROS has the same sensitivity for both the PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cell lines treated with those drugs; therefore, we hypothesized that a similar mechanism was involved following treatment with FYGL. Western blot analysis showed that the protein expression level of the Bcl-2 protein was decreased in the PANC-1 cell line treated with FYGL. In addition, the ROS was also increased, as a result, the caspase-3/cleaved-caspase-3 proteins were activated, which led to a reduction in MMP and ultimately, PANC-1 cell apoptosis; however, this did not occur in the Mia PaCa-2 cell line.
Furthermore, ROS also plays a crucial role in the activation of cell autophagy (18,35). Cell autophagy can provide nutrients and energy for cancer cells, promote the development of cancer cells, and leads to cancer cell resistance to treatment. The excessive accumulation of ROS can induce cell autophagy (36). In the present study, the ratio of LC3-I/II was decreased in PANC-1 cells, indicating an increase in the number of autophagosomes. However, the protein expression level of P62 was increased in the PANC-1 cells treated with 500 and 1,000 µg/ml FYGL compared with that in the control cells, indicating an inhibition of autophagy. We hypothesized that the failure of the autophagy process resulted from the inhibition of autophagosomes from entering the lysosomes. A schematic of FYGL killing pancreatic cancer cells was proposed, as shown in Fig. 10. First, FYGL was absorbed into the cells probably through the process of micropinocytosis (37). Then, FYGL decreased MMP and induced ROS production through inhibiting the expression of Bcl-2 protein. The increase of ROS production damaged organelles and proteins, which activated both the cell autophagy and cell apoptosis pathways. More autophagosomes were synthesized to wrap damaged organelles, consuming lots of LC3-I protein and PE to synthesize LC3-II protein, which is an important part of the autophagosome membrane. However, FYGL halts the downstream process of autophagy by inhibiting the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, which caused the upregulation of P62 proteins and increased the production of ROS, as well as induced metabolic deficiency. The increase of ROS and the blockage of autophagy promoted apoptosis in the PANC-1 cells in the present study.
In addition, Boya et al (22) reported that autophagy inhibition lead to the accumulation of defective mitochondria and an increase in ROS production, while Humpton et al (38) found that KRAS-NIX-mediated mitophagy was a novel driver of glycolysis and redox activities. Future studies will investigate whether the energy metabolic processes of pancreatic cancer cells are forced to switch under the treatment of FYGL.
In pancreatic cells, macropinocytosis drives the internalization of extracellular proteins and saccharides, and thereafter degradation in lysosomes, to produce amino acids and sugars (39,40). When nutrients, such as amino acids, are plentiful, the mTORC1 signaling pathway could inactivate lysosomes to inhibit autophagy (41,42). FYGL endocytosed in the PANC-1 cells might be degraded into amino acids and sugars, potentially inhibiting cell autophagy.
A limitation of the present study was that in vitro experiments alone are not sufficient to validate the inhibitory effects of FYGL on tumors. Therefore, future studies should include in vivo experiments. However, the present study conclusively demonstrated that, FYGL could selectively kill pancreatic cancer cells through regulation of ROS and the simultaneous inhibition of autophagy in the following processes: FYGL promoted PANC-1 cell apoptosis by inducing ROS, and the increase of ROS increased the number of autophagosomes. On the other hand, FYGL halts the downstream process of autophagy by inhibiting the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes. This increased the accumulation of defective mitochondria and the production of ROS, as well as induced metabolic deficiency. Both processes promoted apoptosis in the PANC-1 cells. The results from the present study suggested that FYGL could be used as a potential agent for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 21374022 and 81374032); The Scientific National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for ‘Significant New Drugs Development’ (grant no. 2017ZX09301006) and the Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan ‘Science and Technology Support Project in Biomedical Science’ (grant no. 17401902700).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author's contributions
XW and PZ designed and performed the experiments. LJ and JL performed part of the western blotting experiments. HL, YP and SY performed the experiments involving cell culture and cell viability. ZZ, YH, HY and YT contributed to the data analysis. XW wrote the manuscript. HY and PZ reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual information. PZ conceived the study and was responsible for the revision of the manuscript and final decision to submit the article for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 69:7–34. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T and Takaori K: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 388:73–85. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burris HR III, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, et al: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 15:2403–2413. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shiao MS: Natural products of the medicinal fungus Ganoderma lucidum: Occurrence, biological activities, and pharmacological functions. Chem Rec. 3:172–180. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Teng BS, Wang CD, Yang HJ, Wu JS, Zhang D, Zheng M, Fan ZH, Pan D and Zhou P: A protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B activity inhibitor from the fruiting bodies of Ganoderma lucidum (Fr.) Karst and its hypoglycemic potency on streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic mice. J Agric Food Chem. 59:6492–6500. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pan D, Wang L, Chen C, Hu B and Zhou P: Isolation and characterization of a hyperbranched proteoglycan from Ganoderma lucidum for anti-diabetes. Carbohyd Polym. 117:106–114. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pan D, Zhang D, Wu J, Chen C, Xu Z, Yang H and Zhou P: Antidiabetic, antihyperlipidemic and antioxidant activities of a novel proteoglycan from Ganoderma lucidum fruiting bodies on db/db mice and the possible mechanism. PLoS One. 8:e683322013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Teng BS, Wang CD, Zhang D, Wu JS, Pan D, Pan LF, Yang HJ and Zhou P: Hypoglycemic effect and mechanism of a proteoglycan from ganoderma lucidum on streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 16:166–175. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gorrini C, Harris IS and Mak TW: Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 12:931–947. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen Y, McMillan-Ward E, Kong J, Israels SJ and Gibson SB: Oxidative stress induces autophagic cell death independent of apoptosis in transformed and cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 15:171–182. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khan M, Ding C, Rasul A, Yi F, Li T, Gao H, Gao R, Zhong L, Zhang K, Fang X and Ma T: Isoalantolactone induces reactive oxygen species mediated apoptosis in pancreatic carcinoma PANC-1 cells. Int J Biol Sci. 8:533–547. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schumacker PT: Reactive oxygen species in cancer cells: Live by the sword, die by the sword. Cancer Cell. 10:175–176. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li PF, Dietz R and von Harsdorf R: p53 regulates mitochondrial membrane potential through reactive oxygen species and induces cytochrome c-independent apoptosis blocked by Bcl-2. EMBO J. 18:6027–6036. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Vries HE, Witte M, Hondius D, Rozemuller AJ, Drukarch B, Hoozemans J and van Horssen J: Nrf2-induced antioxidant protection: A promising target to counteract ROS-mediated damage in neurodegenerative disease? Free Radic Biol Med. 45:1375–1383. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hur J, Sullivan KA, Schuyler AD, Hong Y, Pande M, States DJ, Jagadish HV and Feldman EL: Literature-based discovery of diabetes- and ROS-related targets. BMC Med Genomics. 3:492010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pelicano H, Carney D and Huang P: ROS stress in cancer cells and therapeutic implications. Drug Resist Updat. 7:97–110. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liochev SI: Reactive oxygen species and the free radical theory of aging. Free Radic Biol Med. 60:1–4. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mizushima N: Autophagy: Process and function. Genes Dev. 21:2861–2873. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Degenhardt K, Mathew R, Beaudoin B, Bray K, Anderson D, Chen G, Mukherjee C, Shi Y, Gélinas C, Fan Y, et al: Autophagy promotes tumor cell survival and restricts necrosis, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 10:51–64. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo JY, Chen HY, Mathew R, Fan J, Strohecker AM, Karsli-Uzunbas G, Kamphorst JJ, Chen G, Lemons JM, Karantza V, et al: Activated Ras requires autophagy to maintain oxidative metabolism and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 25:460–470. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang S, Wang X, Contino G, Liesa M, Sahin E, Ying H, Bause A, Li Y, Stommel JM, Dell'Antonio G, et al: Pancreatic cancers require autophagy for tumor growth. Genes Dev. 25:717–729. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boya P, Gonzalez-Polo RA, Casares N, Perfettini JL, Dessen P, Larochette N, Metivier D, Meley D, Souquere S, Yoshimori T, et al: Inhibition of macroautophagy triggers apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 25:1025–1040. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
El-Khattouti A, Selimovic D, Haikel Y and Hassan M: Crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies in cancer. J Cell Death. 6:37–55. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen S, Cheng AC, Wang MS and Peng X: Detection of apoptosis induced by new type gosling viral enteritis virus in vitro through fluorescein annexin V-FITC/PI double labeling. World J Gastroenterol. 14:2174–2178. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Budihardjo I, Oliver H, Lutter M, Luo X and Wang X: Biochemical pathways of caspase activation during apoptosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 15:269–290. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang J, Liu X, Bhalla K, Kim CN, Ibrado AM, Cai J, Peng TI, Jones DP and Wang X: Prevention of apoptosis by Bcl-2: Release of cytochrome c from mitochondria blocked. Science. 275:1129–1132. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Poupel F, Aghaei M, Movahedian A, Jafari SM and Shahrestanaki MK: Dihydroartemisinin induces apoptosis in human bladder cancer cell lines through reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial membrane potential, and cytochrome c pathway. Int J Prev Med. 8:782017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, Kirisako T, Noda T, Kominami E, Ohsumi Y and Yoshimori T: LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 19:5720–5728. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pankiv S, Clausen TH, Lamark T, Brech A, Bruun JA, Outzen H, Øvervatn A, Bjørkøy G and Johansen T: p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J Biol Chem. 282:24131–24145. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park SH, Sung JH, Kim EJ and Chung N: Berberine induces apoptosis via ROS generation in PANC-1 and MIA-PaCa2 pancreatic cell lines. Braz J Med Biol Res. 48:111–119. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duong HQ, Hwang JS, Kim HJ, Seong YS and Bae I: BML-275, an AMPK inhibitor, induces DNA damage, G2/M arrest and apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 41:2227–2236. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Messner MC and Cabot MC: Cytotoxic responses to N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 68:477–487. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vaquero EC, Edderkaoui M, Pandol SJ, Gukovsky I and Gukovskaya AS: Reactive oxygen species produced by NAD(P)H oxidase inhibit apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 279:34643–34654. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng L, Yan B, Chen K, Jiang Z, Zhou C, Cao J, Qian W, Li J, Sun L, Ma J, et al: Resveratrol-induced downregulation of NAF-1 enhances the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine via the ROS/Nrf2 signaling pathways. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018:94820182018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scherz-Shouval R, Shvets E, Fass E, Shorer H, Gil L and Elazar Z: Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4. EMBO J. 26:1749–1760. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scherz-Shouval R and Elazar Z: ROS, mitochondria and the regulation of autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 17:422–427. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang Z, Wu F, Yang H and Zhou P: Endocytosis mechanism of a novel proteoglycan, extracted from Ganoderma lucidum, in HepG2 cells. Rsc Adv. 7:41779–41786. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Humpton TJ, Alagesan B, DeNicola GM, Lu D, Yordanov GN, Leonhardt CS, Yao MA, Alagesan P, Zaatari MN, Park Y, et al: Oncogenic KRAS induces NIX-mediated mitophagy to promote pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 9:1268–1287. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Y and Commisso C: Macropinocytosis in cancer: A complex signaling network. Trends Cancer. 5:332–334. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Commisso C, Davidson SM, Soydaner-Azeloglu RG, Parker SJ, Kamphorst JJ, Hackett S, Grabocka E, Nofal M, Drebin JA, Thompson CB, et al: Macropinocytosis of protein is an amino acid supply route in Ras-transformed cells. Nature. 497:633–637. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Florey O and Overholtzer M: Macropinocytosis and autophagy crosstalk in nutrient scavenging. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 374:201801542019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Palm W, Park Y, Wright K, Pavlova NN, Tuveson DA and Thompson CB: The utilization of extracellular proteins as nutrients is suppressed by mTORC1. Cell. 162:259–270. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |