Open Access

Akt regulates RSK2 to alter phosphorylation level of H2A.X in breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Zhi-Feng Guo
    • Fan-Long Kong
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 6, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12448
  • Article Number: 187
  • Copyright: © Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Histone H2AX (H2A.X) is a variant of the histone H2A family. Phosphorylation of H2A.X is a marker of DNA strand breaks and the presence or absence of H2A.X is closely related to tumor susceptibility and drug resistance. The present study found that the activity of the serine/threonine kinase Akt was negatively associated with H2A.X phosphorylated at the Ser16 site (H2A.X S16ph), but the mechanism of the inverse relationship remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the mechanism of action between Akt and H2A.X S16ph and the exact role of this mechanism. Western blot analysis was performed to detect the regulatory association between p‑Akt and H2A.X S16ph/p‑RSK2, and immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation were performed to prove that Akt, RSK2 and H2A.X combine and interact in human breast cancer cells. The changes of cellular proliferation and migration induced by the interaction of Akt, RSK2 and H2A.X was determined by MTT, soft agar colony formation and cell migration experiments. The effect of interaction of Akt, RSK2 and H2A.X on cancer‑promoting genes, such as PSAT‑1 was determined via reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR analysis. The current study indicated that the serine/threonine kinase ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2) as a kinase of H2A.X could be phosphorylated by Akt at Ser19 site. Moreover, Akt positively regulated the phosphorylation of RSK2 to inhibit phosphorylation of H2A.X, thereby affecting the affinity between RSK2 and substrate histone, promoting the survival and migration of breast cancer cells. In conclusion, Akt‑mediated phosphorylation of RSK2 regulated the phosphorylation of H2A.X, thereby promoting oncogenic activity. This finding provides new insights to understand the pathogenesis and treatment mechanisms of breast cancer.

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common female malignant tumors in the world (1), which has been proved to be the second leading cause of death by cancer among women worldwide (2). According to statistics, there were 1.67 million new breast cancer cases and 500,000 mortalities worldwide in 2012 (3). Currently, the pathogenesis of breast cancer is not completely understood, but the cause of breast cancer is related to a number of factors including age and breast gland density (4,5). The incidence of breast cancer in women increases with age (6,7), and the incidence of breast cancer in women with high breast density is 4–6 times higher than that in women with low breast density (8,9). Although the treatment of cancer has improved over the years, the current treatment for breast cancer mainly including surgical operation and chemotherapy cannot effectively ameliorate the overall survival of patients with breast cancer because of the metastasis of breast cancer (10). The high mortality of breast cancer is due to the metastasis and drug resistance of breast cancer cells (11,12). About 30% of patients with breast cancer will have axillary lymph node metastasis and distal organ (stone, liver, lung and brain) metastasis, reducing the survival rate of patients (13,14). During the course of chemotherapy treatment for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the chemical resistance of cancer cells may be caused by the disorder of DNA replication, the repair of key enzymes, the change of apoptosis related genes and the abnormal regulation of key signaling pathways, which decreases the effectiveness of cancer treatment (14,15). Therefore, the study of new treatment methods for breast cancer is necessary and it is vital to explore the molecular mechanism of its formation, which may provide improved treatment strategies for breast cancer.

Epigenetic modifications including DNA modifications (e.g. methylation) and histone modifications (e.g. phosphorylation and methylation) and abnormalities of non-coding RNA affect cellular function and transcriptional activity (16). A number of studies have shown that cancer is often accompanied by various histone modifications, which are related to the chromatin structure and the transcriptional activity of proto-oncogene or tumor suppressor genes, affecting the development of diverse cancers (1719). For example, DNA hypermethylation is associated with the pathogenesis of colon cancer, lung cancer and prostate cancer (2022). Abdel-Hafiz and Horwitz (23) showed that the level of histone methylation is associated with the occurrence and development of metastatic breast cancer. In addition, Liu et al (24) found that the downregulation of microRNA-20a expression can accelerate the progression of ovarian cancer. Other studies have shown that signaling pathways can directly affect important components of the epigenetic machinery (25). For instance, Avanzato et al (26) suggested that the expression of phosphorylated (p-) Akt in breast cancer tissues is significantly higher than that in the paracancerous tissues. In addition, and the PI3K/Akt pathway can positively regulates the pro-apoptotic protein BAD (27). Furthermore, Liu et al (28) revealed that the protein bifunctional arginine demethylase and lysyl-hydroxylase JMJD6 (JMJD6) promoted the development of TNBC cells by phosphorylating the histone H2AX (H2A.X) at the Tyr39 (Y39) site, which regulates autophagy genes in order to stimulate autophagy flux. In addition, the increase of autophagy flux can inhibit cell proliferation in the middle and late stages of breast cancer (28).

H2A.X plays an important role in regulating the repair of double stranded DNA breaks (29). The phosphorylation of H2A.X at Ser139 (S139) binds well with each double stranded break and is considered the most sensitive marker for examining the level of DNA damage and the subsequent repair of DNA lesions (30). In cancer cells, when the DNA repair mechanisms are dysfunctional, cells become dependent on the remaining pathways, including the PI3K/Akt and ATM/γH2AX pathways and this renders them more vulnerable to therapies that target these specific pathways (31). The loss of H2A.X in a human non-tumorigenic breast cell line leads to the activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), thus enhancing the ability of migration and invasion of breast cancer cells (32). Ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2), an important regulator of cell survival, transcription, growth and proliferation, is able to phosphorylate H2A.X at S139 and Ser16 (S16) to delay the process of breast cancer (33). RSK2 is known for mediating the growth of osteosarcoma cells through regulating the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway (34). In acid-tolerable malignant mesothelioma, the phosphorylation of H2A.X is a biomarker of DNA damage, and the Akt can negatively regulate the phosphorylation of H2A.X (35). We occasionally found p-Akt can negatively regulate the phosphorylation of H2A.X in breast cancer cells, however, at present, an interaction between Akt and H2A.X has not been reported in breast cancer, and thus, the aim of the present study was to explore this connection.

Materials and methods

Cells and animals

Human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, HGC-27, HeLa cell lines were purchased from the Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-157 was obtained from the ATCC Global Bioresource Center. Cells were cultured in complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; all purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2 at 37°C for 1 week.

Antibodies

The primary and secondary antibodies used in this study are as follows. The primary antibodies: Akt antibody (cat. no. 9272; dilution 1:1,000), Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (193H12) Rabbit mAb (p-Akt, cat. no. 4058; dilution 1:1,000), β-actin antibody (cat. no. 4967; dilution 1:1,000), p-glycogen synthase kinase-3β (p-GSK3β; cat. no. 9336, dilution 1:1,000), Phospho-GSK-3α/β (Ser21/9) Antibody (t-GSK3β, cat. no. 9331, dilution 1:1,000), Phospho-RSK2 (Ser227) (D53A11) Rabbit mAb (p-RSK2, cat. no. 3556; dilution 1:1,000), RSK2 (D21B2) XP® Rabbit mAb (cat. no. 5528; dilution 1:1,000) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., and anti-histone H2A.X antibody (cat. no. ab229914; dilution 1:1,000), anti-HA-tag antibody (cat. no. ab9110; dilution 1:1,0000), anti-Myc-tag [9E10] (cat. no. ab32; dilution 1:1,000), anti-histone H3 (acetyl K18) antibody (H2A.X S16ph; cat. no. ab1191; dilution 1:1,000), anti-DDDDK-tag (Binds to FLAG® tag sequence) antibody (Flag-tag, cat. no. ab205606; dilution 1:50,000) and anti-GAPDH antibody (cat. no. ab9485; dilution 1:2,500) were purchased from Abcam. All primary antibodies were from Rabbit. The secondary antibodies: Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) (cat. no. ab205718; dilution 1:5,000).

Western blotting

Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 150 mM NaCl), and the protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) method. Briefly, 200 µl of the BCA working solution and 20 µl of diluted sample protein were added per well into 96-well plates and the absorbance was measured at 526 nm after incubation at 37°C for 30 min. Protein concentration was calculated in relation to the standard curve. Protein samples (50 µg) were then separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes, followed by blocking at 25°C for 1 h in 5% non-fat milk powder. Membranes were then incubated at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies. The membranes were then washed with TBS-Tween buffer to remove the free protein and incubated with anti-goat and anti-rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) (cat. no. ab205718; dilution 1:5,000; Abcam) secondary antibodies at 25°C for 1 h. The protein bands were visualized using the ECL Western blotting kit (cat. no. WP20005; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and the bands were exposed to autoradiography film. β-actin was used as the loading control. Each experiment was repeated three times.

Cell transfection and treatment

Akt siRNA (si-Akt), RSK2 siRNA (si-RSK2), negative control siRNA (si-NC), RSK2S19A (Ser19 site of RSK2 was replaced by Ala) plasmid and RSK2S19E (Ser19 site of RSK2 was replaced by S19E) plasmid were purchased and constructed by Hanbio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The sequences of siRNA: si-Akt, 5′-CUGACCAAGAUGACAGCAU-3′ (sense), 5′-AUGCUGUCAUCUUGGUCAG-3′ (antisense); si-RSK2, 5′-AGUUUACUGAUGGAUAUGAAGUAAA-3′ (sense), 5′-AGAAGAAGAUGUCAAAUUCUACUUG-3′ (antisense); si-NC, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ (sense), 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′ (antisense). DN-Akt (dominant negative Akt) and CA-Akt (constitutively activated Akt) were purchased from (Addgene, Inc.).MBA-MD-231 cells (106 cells/ml, 50 µl/well) were cultured in the 6-well plates with complete DMEM for 24 h, before being transfected with the plasmids (1 µg/ml) include the control empty vector pEGFP-N1, and the generated plasmids DN-Akt, CA-Akt, RSK2S19A and RSK2S19E. In addition, si-Akt, si-RSK2 and the si-NCwere also transfected. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 3,000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After 48 h of transfection, the transfection efficiency was determined by western blotting. As presented in Fig. S1, the transfection efficiency was high. When needed cells were stimulated with insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 15 ng/ml for 30 min or treated with the PI3K-Akt inhibitor LY294002 16 µM for 24 h.

Peptide competition assay

A polyclonal antibody was generated in-house to specifically recognize an RSK2 peptide that harbored the phosphorylated S19 (anti-RSK2-S19ph antibody). The specificity of the anti-RSK2-S19ph antibody was examined by peptide competition assay. The synthesized phospho-RSK2 and non-phospho-RSK2 peptides were purchased from Medical & Biological Laboratories (Beijing, China). Firstly, 10 µM anti-RSK2-S19ph antibody was pre-incubated with phospho-RSK2 or non-phospho-RSK2 peptide for 20 min at 30°C. Then, the total protein was extracted from MDA-MB-231 cells using 1× SDS buffer, and boiled at 95°C for 10 min to inactivate the protein. Next, the total protein was separated on 15% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes. Then the membranes were incubated with anti-RSK2-S19ph antibody (1:1,000) pre-treated with phospho-RSK2 or non-phospho-RSK2 peptides for 1 h at 30°C for the detection of p-RSK2. The membranes were also incubated anti-RSK2 antibody (1:1,000) with same condition for the detection of RSK2.

MTT assay

MTT assay was used to detect the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells. The MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in MDEM with penicillin-streptomycin and FBS for 7 days at 37°C. Then, the cells were seeded into 96-well plates (5×103 cells/well) with complete DMEM (100 µl per well). Next, the cells were transfected with WT-/MUT (S19A and S19E)-RSK2 plasmids, and the blank vector as the negative control. A total of 20 µl of a 5 mg/ml MTT solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA) was added to each well after the cells were cultured for 1, 2 and 3 days, and the plate was incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Then, the MTT was discarded, and DMSO (150 µl/well) was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 10 min and the absorbance values were measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader.

Soft agar colony formation assay

First of all, we carried out a pre-experiment of colony formation assay to measure the cell vitality by using acid phosphatase method to detect the cellular ability of survival and proliferation. Then, a cell suspension (MDA-MB-231 cells with DMEM, FBS and penicillin-streptomycin) of 1,000 living cells/m and were added to 3% (w/v) melted agar. Then, the cell-agar suspensions (1 ml/well) were added into 6-well plates and after solidification, cells were maintained at 37°C. After 14 days, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 1% crystal violet and the colonies were counted manually.

Transwell migration assay

Cell migration was assayed using a Transwell chamber (8 µm, 12 wells). A total of 1×104 cells in serum-free DMEM were transferred to the upper compartment of the well inserts and the cells were cultured for 24 h at 37°C. Meanwhile, the lower compartment was filled with complete DMEM (10% FBS). After 24 h, the cells on the top surface of the membrane were wiped off softly with a cotton swab and the cells that migrated to the bottom of the membrane were fixed with methanol and were stained with 5% crystal violet for 10 min at room temperature and were visualized using a Leica DC 300F microscope (magnification, ×400).

Kinase activity assay

The kinase activity of RSK2 was tested by measuring the level of H2A phosphorylation after stimulation with RSK2. The assay mixture included the Myc-tag wild type (WT) RSK2 plasmid (addgen) or the mutant RSK2 (MUT-RSK2) plasmids (S19A and S19E), with 10 µM CoA (Abcam) and 10 µg H2A (Abcam), which were incubated with the kinase assay buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 30 min at 30°C. The kinase activity of hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged Akt (HA-Akt) phosphorylating Myc-tagged RSK2 (Myc-RSK2) was assayed by western blotting by measuring the phosphorylated H2A in the presence of H2A and acetyl-CoA. In addition, the protein tags, including Myc and HA were attached to carrier and used to detect the target protein more conveniently.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

A total of 3×106 cells/ml were crosslinked in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at 25°C, followed by washing with ice-cold PBS for 3 times and cell lysis with SDS lysis buffer (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.). The lysates were then sonicated to shear the DNA into 200–800 bp fragments and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was diluted with ChIP DB (1% Triton X-100; 1.2 mM EDTA; 16.7 mM Tris-HCL, pH 0.8; 167 mM NaCl; 0.1 mM PMSF) and was cultured overnight with the A/G agarose beads (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and primary antibody against RSK2, H2A.X and β-actin at 4°C. The normal anti-Rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody served as the control. The beads were washed for 5 min with low-salt (150 mM NaCl; 0.1% SDS; 1% Triton X-100; 2 mM EDTA; 20 mM Tris-HCL, pH 0.8) high-salt (500 mM NaCl; 0.1% SDS; 1% Triton X-100; 2 mM EDTA; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 0.8) and LiCl buffers at 4°C and were finally washed with 1X Tris-EDTA at 25°C for 2 min. The DNA was eluted from the beads by adding 1% SDS and NaCl was added to the eluant for 7 h at 65°C to reverse the crosslinks. Subsequently, the eluted DNA was precipitated by ethanol at −20°C, following by treatment with 20 µg proteinase K to digest proteins attached to DNA. DNA was purified utilizing the QIAquick PCR Purification Columns (Qiagen China Co., Ltd.). Finally, the purified DNA was analyzed by RT-qPCR.

Co-immunoprecipitation analysis

MDA-MB-231 cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate] for 30 min on ice. After the lysates were centrifuged at 4°C for 30 min at 12,000 × g, the supernatant was incubated with the primary antibodies: Anti-Akt antibody (cat. no. 9272; dilution 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and anti-RSK2 antibody (cat. no. 5528; dilution 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) overnight at 4°C. The normal anti-Rabbit IgG antibody (cat. no. 2729; dilution 1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) served as the negative control, and the whole lysates as the positive control. On the following day, A/G agarose beads (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) were added to the lysates and incubated for a further 3 h, after which the beads were washed with PBS and collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 3,000 × g at 4°C. The proteins were released by boiling the samples and were analyzed by western blotting on a 15% SDS-PAGE.

Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q) PCR

The total RNA of RSK2 and the target genes of Akt like PSAT-1 were extracted and purified using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Next, 5 µg total RNA was applied to synthesize cDNA using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, the mixture system including SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (500 nM), cDNA templates (50 ng) and primers (500 nM) were applied to Real-time qPCR to detect the expression of RSK2 and PSAT-1, according to standard methods (95°C, 3 min; 95°C, 30 sec, 30 circles; 55°C, 30 sec, and 72°C, 60 sec). Finally, the PCR products was electrophoresed with 1.5% agarose gel, and the electrophoretic bands were observed. The relative expression was calculated by 2−ΔΔCq method (36). GAPDH were applied to as an internal control of the target gene of Akt, and the β-actin as the control of RSK2. The primer sequences used for qPCR are listed in Table I.

Table I.

Primer sequences used for quantitative PCR.

Table I.

Primer sequences used for quantitative PCR.

GeneForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)
RSK2 TCCGACTTAAATGAAAGGAG GCTCAGCATTGTAGGTGAC
CDKN2A GAAGAAAGAGGAGGGGTTGG GAAGAAAGAGGAGGGGTTGG
PUMA GCCAGATTTGTGAGACAAGAGG CAGGCACCTAATTGGGCTC
Dram 1 GCGCGCTCCGGAAATCCCCCGGGAG CCTCGCACCCCGAGGGCG
PTEN CCGAAAGGTTTTGCTACCATTCT AAAATTATTTCCTTTCTGAGCATTCC
ING3 ACCTGAGTGGAGGGAAGAGC CTGGTTTGCCAACTGAACCT
PSAT-1 CGGAATTCCGATGGACGCCCCCA GGAAGATCTCTCATAGCTGATGCATCTCCA
Bax TGCTTCAGGGTTTCATCCAGG TGGCAAAGTAGAAAAGGGCGA
RTK6 CGTACGAGGTAAACAGGAG AGCTTGTTCTCCTCGCTGTA
GAPDH TCGACAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCTTT GCCCAATACGACCAAATCCGTTGA
β-actin TCAGGTCATCACTATCGGCAATAAAGAA AGGGTGTAAAACGCA
Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis between two groups was calculated using unpaired Student's t-test, and the comparison among multiple groups was evaluated with ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons test. The statistical graphs were drawn using GraphPad Prism (version 7.0; GraphPad Software, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Akt inversely regulates H2A.X S16ph

MDA-MB-231 was selected as the main experimental cell line as it has a higher ability of invasion and migration compared with the other breast cancer cell lines (37). Western blot results showed that breast cancer cells with high levels of p-Akt generally had lower levels of H2A.X S16ph (Fig. 1A). This phenomenon prompted the investigation on whether H2A.X S16 phosphorylation was affected by Akt. Indeed, when the MDA-MB-231 cells were stimulated with IGF to increase the phosphorylation of Akt, a decrease in H2A.X S16ph was observed, and this effect was reversed after the introduction of the PI3K-Akt inhibitor LY294002 (Fig. 1B). Likewise, when the MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with DN-Akt (Fig. 1C and S1A) or when the expression of Akt was knocked down by siRNA (Fig. 1D) the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16 also increased. As presented in Fig. 1C, GSK3β was a control of p-Akt as it can be phosphorylated by Akt (38). Furthermore, the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16 was negatively associated with the activity of Akt over time (Fig. 1E).

Akt interacts with and phosphorylates RSK2 on Ser19 (S19)

To examine how the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16 was regulated by Akt signaling, the activity of the RSK2 enzyme that regulates H2A.X S16ph (33) was assessed. No change was observed after IGF was added (Fig. S2). Thus, Akt was examined to understand if it can regulate RSK2 activity and therefore affect the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed to confirm the interaction between RSK2 and Akt. Results showed that Myc-RSK2 and HA-Akt could be detected in the presence of each other, when CA-Akt was expressed but not DN-Akt (Fig. 2A). Besides, the association between the endogenous Akt and RSK2 was reduced after treatment with LY294002 (Fig. 2B). Thus, the results suggested that Akt and RSK2 interacted with each other in vitro.

Subsequently, a kinase assay was performed using RSK2 mutants of possible phosphorylation sites to verify whether the phosphorylation site was S19. The result showed that when the S19 site of RSK2 was replaced by an Ala or Glu (S19A and S19E, respectively) or by glutathione S-transferase (GST as a negative control), RSK2 was not phosphorylated by Akt (Fig. 2C). Next, a polyclonal antibody was generated in-house that specifically recognized an RSK2 peptide that harbored the phosphorylated S19 (anti-RSK2-S19ph antibody) to confirm that Akt phosphorylated RSK2 at S19 in vitro (Fig. S3). The association of the phosphorylation of RSK2 at S19 site and Akt was observed in multiple cell lines including the gastric cancer cell line HGC-27 using the specially designed antibody (Fig. S4).

Subsequently, immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were used to investigate whether the phosphorylation of RSK2 at S19 was regulated by Akt using endogenous RSK2 from MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with DN-Akt or treated with LY294002 (Fig. 2D). The result showed that the RSK2 in the MDA-MB-231 cells was phosphorylated in the presence of LY194002 (inhibitor of Akt), but the RSK2 in cells transfected with DN-Akt or in those treated with LY194002 was not phosphorylated (Fig. 2D). In addition, when performing the immunoprecipitation using an antibody against p-RSK2, and western blot using an antibody against RSK2, results showed that the levels of p-RSK2 were reduced when Akt activity was blocked (Fig. 2E). Additionally, when the cells were transfected with the WT- or S19A-RSK2 plasmid, a similar result was observed (Fig. 2F). Altogether these experiments suggested that Akt phosphorylated RSK2 at S19.

Akt suppresses RSK2 kinase activity

To confirm whether the Akt-mediated phosphorylation of RSK2 inhibit the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16, a western blot was performed. The data revealed that CA-Akt decreased the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16 but DN-Akt maintained the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16 (Fig. 3A). In addition, the level of H2A.X S16ph in the cells transfected with RSK2S19A was slightly higher than the H2A.X S16ph in the cells transfected with RSK2S19E (mimicking the phosphorylated state of RSK2) (Fig. 3B). In addition, the levels of H2A.X S16ph decreased when RSK2 was knocked down using siRNA, and this effect was not reversed by DN-Akt (Fig. 3C). In conclusion, p-RSK2, mediated by Akt, inhibited the phosphorylation of H2A.X S16.

In order to further prove that the phosphorylation of RSK2 at S19 by Akt affected the kinase activity of RSK2, in vitro kinase experiments were carried out with WT-RSK2, RSK2S19A and CA-Akt obtained by immunoprecipitation. An increase in the phosphorylation levels of RSK2 and a decrease in RSK2 kinase activity (reflected by a decrease in H2A.X S16ph) were observed for the WT-RSK2 but not the RSK2S19A mutant (Fig. 3D). Flag-tag was used to locate the protein (Fig. 3D). To support this discovery, another kinase activity assay was performed with RSK2 expressed in vitro, where the results showed that H2A.X S16 was phosphorylated by the transfection of WT-RSK2 when compared to the empty vector control, and this phosphorylation was enhanced by the expression of RSK2S19A and was weakened by the expression of RSK2S19E (Fig. 3E). These data suggested that the phosphorylation of RSK2 at S19 regulated by Akt is responsible for regulating the activity of the RSK2 kinase.

Akt-mediated phosphorylation of RSK2 changes substrate affinity

Co-immunoprecipitation assays were used to confirm whether the phosphorylation of RSK2 affects its affinity to histone H2A. The association of H2A with RSK2S19A was greater than H2A with RSK2S19E and WT-RSK2 + LY294002 (Fig. 4A). Next, the binding of RSK2 with soluble protein (S) and insoluble (chromatin-bound) nucleoplasm (C) was evaluated by ChIP in cells for which Akt has been induced by IGF or suppressed by the transfection of DN-Akt or treatment with LY294002 inhibitor. The results demonstrated that the rate of the integration of RSK2 with the chromatin-bound was high when Akt was suppressed, but it was low when Akt was promoted (Fig. 4B-C). The results about the integration rate of RSK2 with soluble demonstrated that the integration rate was high when Akt was overexpressed; however, it was low when Akt was inhibited (Fig. 4B and C).

Moreover, to clarify whether p-RSK2 had a positive effect on neoplasia, the influence of p-RSK2 on target genes from the Akt pathway was assessed with MDA-MB-231 cells. The altered transcription of these genes was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Fig. S5). Certain genes that are affected by RSK2 have been reported to be associated with tumor progression, such as phosphoserine aminotransferase 1 (PSAT-1) that is known as an oncogene from an erythropoietin-producing hepatoma cell line (39), and its expression was promoted by RSK2S19A (RSK2S19A could not be phosphorylated) and inhibited by RSK2S19E when compared with the WT control (removes the influence of exogenous sequence) (Fig. 4D). PCR analysis demonstrated that H2A.X S16ph was highly expressed in the promoter of PSAT-1 of the cells transfected with RSK2S19A (Fig. 4E). In addition, high levels of H2A.X S16ph were observed in the promoter of PSAT-1 of the cells transfected with DN-Akt (Fig. 4F). All experimental results indicated that p-RSK2 may inhibit the phosphorylation of H2A.X and promote the occurrence and development of cancer.

Phosphorylation of RSK2 at S19 by Akt enhances its oncogenic activities

To further demonstrate that the phosphorylation of RSK2 mediated by Akt induced oncogenic activity, MTT, soft agar colony formation and Transwell migration assays were performed in the MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with the WT-RSK2 or MUT-RSK2 (S19A and S19E). The experimental results showed that RSK2S19E and WT-RSK2 promoted cell viability and migration, but RSK2S19A suppressed cell survival and migration when compared with the empty vector control (Fig. 5A-C).

Discussion

In the present study, Akt was found to mediate the phosphorylation of RSK2 at the S19 site, which inhibited the phosphorylation of H2A.X at S16. In addition, it was revealed that the interaction of Akt, RSK2 and H2A.X reduced the affinity between RSK2 and the substrate histone and also inhibited the expression of the cancer promoter, PSAT-1 to some extent, thereby promoting the viability and migration of breast cancer cells.

Akt is a serine/threonine kinase that is located at the center of the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-diphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway (40). Akt is a vital signaling node in cells, and it is also one of the most widely utilized protein kinases for human physiological activities (41). Akt plays an important role in numerous cellular activities, including cell proliferation, cell migration, angiogenesis, etc (42). Additionally, the activation of Akt and its related pathways is associated with tumorigenesis and poor prognosis (43). For instance, the amplification of three subtypes of Akt is detected in a variety of tumor cells, including colon, stomach, prostate and ovarian cancers (44,45). Moreover, the overactivation of the PI3K/Akt pathway increased the number of cancer stem cells, promotes cancer cell metastasis and induces drug resistance (46,47). In addition, the activity of the Akt/PI3K pathway regulates the growth, proliferation and survival of cells affecting the response of tumor cells to radiotherapy (48).

Histone H2A.X is a mutant of histone H2A and is widely expressed in the genome and is highly conserved among species (49). In the absence of histone H2A.X, gene stability is decreased and the susceptibility of cells to become cancerous increases, suggesting that H2A.X may be a tumor suppressor (50). Weyemi et al (50) showed that the presence of H2A.X in colon cancer cells confers a strong ability to metastatic colonization, making the tumor invasive, and a high level of phosphorylation of H2A.X is one sign of a premalignant lesion and the early stages of cancer. Zhu et al and Dong et al (33,51) found that the combination of a high phosphorylation of H2A.X at the Tyr142 or S139 sites and the RAS/ERK pathway in gastric cancer cells enhanced the apoptosis response caused by DNA damage, and increased the susceptibility of cancer cells to drug treatment. In addition, Livin/Baculoviral IAP repeat-contaning protein 7 induces the proliferation and migration of colon cancer cells by phosphorylating H2A.X at the Y39 site by the degradation of JMJD6 (28). Livin also increases the phosphorylation of H2A.XY39 in lung cancer and breast cancer cells (29,52). S16 is a newly reported phosphorylation site for H2A.X, and the phosphorylation of this site prevents the ubiquitination of the histone (33). Based on the aforementioned properties of Akt and H2A.X, the present study attempted to explore the relationship between these two molecules in breast cancer. Ultimately, it was demonstrated that knocking out or inhibiting Akt lead to an increase in H2A.X phosphorylation at S16 and that Akt was negatively associated with H2A.X.

To examine this interaction, the present work focused on RSK2, which is an important kinase of H2A.X. RSK2 controls several processes related to tumorigenesis, including proliferation, viability and motility (33). In addition, RSK2 promotes the invasion and metastasis of liver cancer and colon cancer, contributes to the survival of multiple myeloma cells and participates in the proliferation of prostate cancer cells and the development of c-fos-dependent osteosarcoma (5355). Zhu et al (33) also suggested that RSK2-mediated phosphorylation of H2A.X increased the stability of H2A.X, thereby reducing the rate of cell transformation and inhibiting the onset of cancer. Thus, we hypothesized that Akt and RSK2 interacted with each other.

Supporting this hypothesis, Akt was found to phosphorylate RSK2 at S19, which inhibited H2A.X phosphorylation at S16. Then, it was established that Akt interacted with RSK2 and H2A.X. The Akt-mediated phosphorylation of RSK2 altered its substrate affinity to H2A and the expression level of certain transcription factors, including PSAT-1. This is important because the PSAT-1 factor was inhibited by the decrease of H2A.X S16ph that was mediated by the Akt-RSK2 pathway, and PSAT-1 is known to promote the survival and proliferation of cancer cells (56). Moreover, the present study further indicated that the survival and migration of breast cancer cells was promoted by the Akt-induced phosphorylation of RSK2 at S19, which inhibited the phosphorylation of H2A.X at S16.

In conclusion, the findings of the present study demonstrated that the interaction between Akt, RSK2 and H2A.X serves an important role in regulating the development of breast cancer. Specifically, Akt targets the phosphorylation of RSK2 at S19 to regulate the phosphorylation of histone H2A.X in breast cancer, which in turn, affects the survival and migration of breast cancer cells. Therefore, these molecules might be effective molecular targets for the treatment of breast cancer, providing another avenue for understanding the pathogenesis of breast cancer.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

ZFG designed experiments, drafted the initial manuscript and approved the manuscript. FLK performed the experiments and analyzed the experimental results. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Yu Y, Luo W, Yang ZJ, Chi JR, Li YR, Ding Y, Ge J, Wang X and Cao XC: miR-190 suppresses breast cancer metastasis by regulation of TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Cancer. 17:702018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Liu BW, Yu ZH, Chen AX, Chi JR, Ge J, Yu Y and Cao XC: Estrogen receptor-α-miR-1271-SNAI2 feedback loop regulates transforming growth factor-β-induced breast cancer progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 38:1092019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D and Bray F: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 136:E359–E386. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

van de Water W, Bastiaannet E, Dekkers OM, de Craen AJ, Westendorp RG, Voogd AC, van de Velde CJ and Liefers GJ: Adherence to treatment guidelines and survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer by age at diagnosis. Br J Surg. 99:813–820. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Duffy SW, Morrish OWE, Allgood PC, Black R, Gillan MGC, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA, Michell MJ, Dobson HM, et al: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 88:48–56. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Derks MGM, Bastiaannet E, van de Water W, de Glas NA, Seynaeve C, Putter H, Nortier JWR, Rea D, Hasenburg A, Markopoulos C, Dirix LY, et al: Impact of age on breast cancer mortality and competing causes of death at 10 years follow-up in the adjuvant TEAM trial. Eur J Cancer. 99:1–8. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

McPherson K, Steel CM and Dixon JM: ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ. 309:1003–1006. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, Bernstein L, Salane M, Parisky YR, Astrahan M, Siozon CC and Pike MC: Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 12:332–338. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, Ghosh K, Pruthi S, Brandt KR and Pankratz VS: Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 9:2172007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Li X, Huang R, Ma L, Liu S and Zong X: Locoregional surgical treatment improves the prognosis in primary metastatic breast cancer patients with a single distant metastasis except for brain metastasis. Breast. 45:104–112. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Mamounas EP, Anderson SJ, Dignam JJ, Bear HD, Julian TB, Geyer CE Jr, Taghian A, Wickerham DL and Wolmark N: Predictors of locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from combined analysis of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 30:3960–3966. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB and Johnston PG: Cancer drug resistance: An evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 13:714–726. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kapoor PM, Lindstrom S, Behrens S, Wang X, Michailidou K, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, Dunning AM, Pharoah PDP, et al: Assessment of interactions between 205 breast cancer susceptibility loci and 13 established risk factors in relation to breast cancer risk, in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Int J Epidemiol. 49:216–232. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Nguyen LV, Vanner R, Dirks P and Eaves CJ: Cancer stem cells: An evolving concept. Nat Rev Cancer. 12:133–143. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Chen W, Qin Y, Wang D, Zhou L, Liu Y, Chen S, Yin L, Xiao Y, Yao XH, Yang X, et al: CCL20 triggered by chemotherapy hinders the therapeutic efficacy of breast cancer. PLoS Biol. 16:e20058692018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Sueoka T, Koyama K, Hayashi G and Okamoto A: Chemistry-driven epigenetic investigation of histone and DNA modifications. Chem Rec. 18:1727–1744. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wang Z, Long H, Chang C, Zhao M and Lu Q: Crosstalk between metabolism and epigenetic modifications in autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive overview. Cell Mol Life Sci. 75:3353–3369. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Dziaman T, Gackowski D, Guz J, Linowiecka K, Bodnar M, Starczak M, Zarakowska E, Modrzejewska M, Szpila A, Szpotan J, et al: Characteristic profiles of DNA epigenetic modifications in colon cancer and its predisposing conditions-benign adenomas and inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Epigenetics. 10:722018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Bhol CS, Panigrahi DP, Praharaj PP, Mahapatra KK, Patra S, Mishra SR, Behera BP and Bhutia SK: Epigenetic modifications of autophagy in cancer and cancer therapeutics. Semin Cancer Biol. 66:22–33. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Su J, Huang YH, Cui X, Wang X, Zhang X, Lei Y, Xu J, Lin X, Chen K, Lv J, et al: Homeobox oncogene activation by pan-cancer DNA hypermethylation. Genome Biol. 19:1082018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Zummeren MV, Kremer WW, Leeman A, Bleeker MCG, Jenkins D, Sandt MV, Doorbar J, Heideman DAM, Steenbergen RDM, Snijders PJF, et al: HPV E4 expression and DNA hypermethylation of CADM1, MAL, and miR124-2 genes in cervical cancer and precursor lesions. Mod Pathol. 31:1842–1850. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Angulo JC, Andres G, Ashour N, Sanchez-Chapado M, Lopez JI and Ropero S: Development of castration resistant prostate cancer can be predicted by a DNA hypermethylation profile. J Urol. 195:619–626. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Abdel-Hafiz HA and Horwitz KB: Role of epigenetic modifications in luminal breast cancer. Epigenomics. 7:847–862. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Liu Y, Han S, Li Y, Liu Y, Zhang D, Li Y and Zhang J: MicroRNA-20a contributes to cisplatin-resistance and migration of OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cell line. Oncol Lett. 14:1780–1786. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Safdari Y, Khalili M, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Yazdani Y and Farajnia S: Natural inhibitors of PI3K/AKT signaling in breast cancer: Emphasis on newly-discovered molecular mechanisms of action. Pharmacol Res. 93:1–10. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Avanzato D, Pupo E, Ducano N, Isella C, Bertalot G, Luise C, Pece S, Bruna A, Rueda OM, Caldas C, et al: High USP6NL levels in breast cancer sustain chronic AKT phosphorylation and GLUT1 stability fueling aerobic glycolysis. Cancer Res. 78:3432–3444. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Khor TO, Gul YA, Ithnin H and Seow HF: Positive correlation between overexpression of phospho-BAD with phosphorylated Akt at serine 473 but not threonine 308 in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 210:139–150. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Liu Y, Long YH, Wang SQ, Zhang YY, Li YF, Mi JS, Yu CH, Li DY, Zhang JH and Zhang XJ: JMJD6 regulates histone H2A.X phosphorylation and promotes autophagy in triple-negative breast cancer cells via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Oncogene. 38:980–997. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Liu Y, Long YH, Wang SQ, Li YF and Zhang JH: Phosphorylation of H2A.XTyr39 positively regulates DNA damage response and is linked to cancer progression. FEBS J. 283:4462–4473. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Sharma A, Singh K and Almasan A: Histone H2AX phosphorylation: A marker for DNA damage. Methods Mol Biol. 920:613–626. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

O'Connor MJ: Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Mol Cell. 60:547–560. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Weyemi U, Redon CE, Sethi TK, Burrell AS, Jailwala P, Kasoji M, Abrams N, Merchant A and Bonner WM: Twist1 and Slug mediate H2AX-regulated epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cells. Cell Cycle. 15:2398–2404. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Zhu F, Zykova TA, Peng C, Zhang J, Cho YY, Zheng D, Yao K, Ma WY, Lau AT, Bode AM and Dong Z: Phosphorylation of H2AX at Ser139 and a new phosphorylation site Ser16 by RSK2 decreases H2AX ubiquitination and inhibits cell transformation. Cancer Res. 71:393–403. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Qiu Q, Jiang J, Lin L, Cheng S, Xin D, Jiang W, Shen J and Hu Z: Downregulation of RSK2 influences the biological activities of human osteosarcoma cells through inactivating AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. Int J Oncol. 48:2508–2520. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Lee YJ, Bae JH, Kim SA, Kim SH, Woo KM, Nam HS, Cho MK and Lee SH: Cariporide Enhances the DNA damage and apoptosis in acid-tolerable malignant mesothelioma H-2452 cells. Mol Cells. 40:567–576. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR. Methods. 25:402–408. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Bassett JJ, Bong A HL, Janke EK, Robitaille M, Roberts-Thomson SJ, Peters AA and Monteith GR: Assessment of cytosolic free calcium changes during ceramide-induced cell death in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells expressing the calcium sensor GCaMP6m. Cell Calcium. 72:39–50. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Yang Q, Wen L, Meng Z and Chen Y: Blockage of endoplasmic reticulum stress attenuates nilotinib-induced cardiotoxicity by inhibition of the Akt-GSK3β-Nox4 signaling. Eur J Pharmacol. 822:85–94. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Ravez S, Spillier Q, Marteau R, Feron O and Frederick R: Challenges and opportunities in the development of serine synthetic pathway inhibitors for cancer therapy. J Med Chem. 60:1227–1237. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Yang Q, Jiang W and Hou P: Emerging role of PI3K/AKT in tumor-related epigenetic regulation. Semin Cancer Biol. 59:112–124. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Zheng CH, Wang JB, Lin MQ, Zhang PY, Liu LC, Lin JX, Lu J, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, et al: CDK5RAP3 suppresses Wnt/β-catenin signaling by inhibiting AKT phosphorylation in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 37:592018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Searle EJ, Telfer BA, Mukherjee D, Forster DM, Davies BR, Williams KJ, Stratford IJ and Illidge TM: Akt inhibition improves long-term tumour control following radiotherapy by altering the microenvironment. EMBO Mol Med. 9:1646–1659. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Revathidevi S and Munirajan AK: Akt in cancer: Mediator and more. Semin Cancer Biol. 59:80–91. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Altomare DA and Testa JR: Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene. 24:7455–7464. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Engelman JA, Luo J and Cantley LC: The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 7:606–619. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Guerrero-Zotano A, Mayer IA and Arteaga CL: PI3K/AKT/mTOR: Role in breast cancer progression, drug resistance, and treatment. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 35:515–524. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Xie S, Yu X, Li Y, Ma H, Fan S, Chen W, Pan G, Wang W, Zhang H, Li J and Lin Z: Upregulation of lncRNA ADAMTS9-AS2 promotes salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma metastasis via PI3K/Akt and MEK/Erk signaling. Mol Ther. 26:2766–2778. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Starska K, Forma E, Lewy-Trenda I, Stasikowska-Kanicka O, Skora M and Brys M: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 and 3 expression is associated with regulatory PI3K/AKT kinase activity, as well as invasion and prognosis, in human laryngeal cancer. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 41:253–268. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Redon CE, Nakamura AJ, Martin OA, Parekh PR, Weyemi US and Bonner WM: Recent developments in the use of γ-H2AX as a quantitative DNA double-strand break biomarker. Aging (Albany NY). 3:168–174. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Weyemi U, Redon CE, Choudhuri R, Aziz T, Maeda D, Boufraqech M, Parekh PR, Sethi TK, Kasoji M, Abrams N, et al: The histone variant H2A.X is a regulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Commun. 7:107112016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Dong C, Sun J, Ma S and Zhang G: K-ras-ERK1/2 down-regulates H2A.XY142ph through WSTF to promote the progress of gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 19:5302019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Ge Y, Liu BL, Cui JP and Li SQ: Livin promotes colon cancer progression by regulation of H2A.XY39ph via JMJD6. Life Sci. 234:1167882019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Yao K, Peng C, Zhang Y, Zykova TA, Lee MH, Lee SY, Rao E, Chen H, Ryu J, Wang L, et al: RSK2 phosphorylates T-bet to attenuate colon cancer metastasis and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 114:12791–12796. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Lara R, Mauri FA, Taylor H, Derua R, Shia A, Gray C, Nicols A, Shiner RJ, Schofield E, Bates PA, et al: An siRNA screen identifies RSK1 as a key modulator of lung cancer metastasis. Oncogene. 30:3513–3521. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Kang S, Elf S, Lythgoe K, Hitosugi T, Taunton J, Zhou W, Xiong L, Wang D, Muller S, Fan S, et al: p90 ribosomal S6 kinase 2 promotes invasion and metastasis of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. J Clin Invest. 120:1165–1177. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Ravez S, Spillier Q, Marteau R, Feron O and Frédérick R: Challenges and opportunities in the development of serine synthetic pathway inhibitors for cancer therapy. J Med Chem. 60:1227–1237. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2021
Volume 21 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Guo Z and Kong F: Akt regulates RSK2 to alter phosphorylation level of H2A.X in breast cancer. Oncol Lett 21: 187, 2021.
APA
Guo, Z., & Kong, F. (2021). Akt regulates RSK2 to alter phosphorylation level of H2A.X in breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 21, 187. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12448
MLA
Guo, Z., Kong, F."Akt regulates RSK2 to alter phosphorylation level of H2A.X in breast cancer". Oncology Letters 21.3 (2021): 187.
Chicago
Guo, Z., Kong, F."Akt regulates RSK2 to alter phosphorylation level of H2A.X in breast cancer". Oncology Letters 21, no. 3 (2021): 187. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2021.12448