Open Access

Effects of perioperative eicosapentaenoic acid‑enriched oral nutritional supplement on the long‑term oncological outcomes after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

  • Authors:
    • Toru Aoyama
    • Takaki Yoshikawa
    • Satoshi Ida
    • Haruhiko Cho
    • Kentaro Sakamaki
    • Yuichi Ito
    • Kazumasa Fujitani
    • Nobuhiro Takiguchi
    • Yoshiyuki Kawashima
    • Kazuhiro Nishikawa
    • Soya Nunobe
    • Naoki Hiki
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 15, 2022     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13272
  • Article Number: 151
  • Copyright: © Aoyama et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Basic and clinical reports have suggested that eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) exhibits anti‑tumor activity. The present study evaluated whether perioperative EPA could improve the survival of patients with localized gastric cancer as a key secondary endpoint of a randomized clinical study. The present study was designed as multicenter, open‑label, superiority, randomized trial to confirm the preventive effect of EPA on body weight loss after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eligible patients were randomized to either the standard‑diet group (EPA‑off group) or EPA‑on group by a centralized dynamic method. An EPA‑enriched supplement (ProSure®) was given to the EPA‑on group in addition to their standard diet. This supplement included 600 kcal with 2.2 g/day of EPA. Among the 126 patients who were randomized, 123 patients (EPA‑off group, n=60; EPA‑on group, n=63) were examined in the survival analyses. All background factors were well balanced between the two groups. The 3‑year and 5‑year overall survival rates were 74.6 and 67.8%, respectively, in the EPA‑off group, and 77.8 and 76.2% in the EPA‑on group. There was no significant difference between the EPA‑off and EPA‑on groups (hazard ratio, 0.77; P=0.424). In the subgroup analysis, the hazard ratio was 0.39 in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 0.57 in patients with nodal metastasis. In conclusion, a clear survival benefit of perioperative EPA was not observed in localized gastric cancer. The value of EPA should be further tested in a future study in patients with unfavorable advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial number: UMIN000006380; date of registration, September 21, 2011.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2022
Volume 23 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Ida S, Cho H, Sakamaki K, Ito Y, Fujitani K, Takiguchi N, Kawashima Y, Nishikawa K, Nishikawa K, et al: Effects of perioperative eicosapentaenoic acid‑enriched oral nutritional supplement on the long‑term oncological outcomes after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 23: 151, 2022
APA
Aoyama, T., Yoshikawa, T., Ida, S., Cho, H., Sakamaki, K., Ito, Y. ... Hiki, N. (2022). Effects of perioperative eicosapentaenoic acid‑enriched oral nutritional supplement on the long‑term oncological outcomes after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Oncology Letters, 23, 151. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13272
MLA
Aoyama, T., Yoshikawa, T., Ida, S., Cho, H., Sakamaki, K., Ito, Y., Fujitani, K., Takiguchi, N., Kawashima, Y., Nishikawa, K., Nunobe, S., Hiki, N."Effects of perioperative eicosapentaenoic acid‑enriched oral nutritional supplement on the long‑term oncological outcomes after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer". Oncology Letters 23.5 (2022): 151.
Chicago
Aoyama, T., Yoshikawa, T., Ida, S., Cho, H., Sakamaki, K., Ito, Y., Fujitani, K., Takiguchi, N., Kawashima, Y., Nishikawa, K., Nunobe, S., Hiki, N."Effects of perioperative eicosapentaenoic acid‑enriched oral nutritional supplement on the long‑term oncological outcomes after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer". Oncology Letters 23, no. 5 (2022): 151. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2022.13272