Mechanism of targeting the mTOR pathway to regulate ferroptosis in NSCLC with different EGFR mutations
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 1, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14431
- Article Number: 298
-
Copyright: © Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, and the 5-year survival rate following diagnosis is <15% (1). The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is associated with the growth and progression of cancer and an activation mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain (exon 21 L858R point mutation or exon-19 deletion) has been identified as an oncogenic driver of NSCLC (2). A study has shown that 30–40% of Asian patients with NSCLC harbor EGFR mutations at the time of diagnosis (3). Although it was demonstrated that the overall response and disease control rates in gefitinib- and erlotinib-treated groups (via targeting of EGFR) were 76.9 vs. 74.4% and 90.1 vs. 86.8%, respectively (4), drug resistance is inevitable, and ~36% of patients with NSCLC have EGFR T790M/L858R resistance mutations (5). Although a second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), afatinib, showed high activity in an EGFR T790M/L858R driven xenotransplantation model, it did not increase the objective response rate in patients with NSCLC with drug-resistant mutations (6). Third-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as CO1686 and AZD9291, are the only effective drugs for treating NSCLC with the EGFR L858R/T790M mutation (7,8). However, because the drug resistance molecular subtypes emerged (such as acquisition of the EGFR C797S mutation or loss of the T790M mutation), drug resistance is still inevitable after a period of treatment (9). Additionally, EGFR-TKIs may not be superior to chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC with wild-type EGFR (10). A study demonstrated that chemotherapy showed a superiority in terms of PFS (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.35–2.52) and ORR (16.8 vs. 7.2%; relative risk, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02–1.21) compared with EGFR-TKIs in patients with NSCLC with wild-type EGFR (11). Chemotherapy remains the primary treatment strategy for patients with wild-type EGFR NSCLC (10). Thus, identifying additional treatment strategies for EGFR-resistant mutant and EGFR wild-type NSCLC is important.
Ferroptosis is a newly discovered type of programmed cell death that differs from apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Ferroptosis is characterized by iron-dependent cell death, which progresses with the accumulation of lipid peroxide and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (12). During lipid peroxidation, the activity of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) decreases, and therefore lipid oxides cannot be metabolized through the glutathione reductase reaction catalyzed by GPX4 (13,14). The redox-active iron form (Fe2+) oxidizes lipids in a manner similar to that of the Fenton reaction to produce large amounts of ROS, causing an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA), which promotes ferroptosis (15). Ferritin is a major intracellular iron storage protein complex that includes ferritin light-chain polypeptide 1 and ferritin heavy-chain polypeptide 1 (FTH1) (16), and increased ferritin expression limits ferroptosis (17). In addition, iron levels are actively regulated in cells through transferrin, which transports iron into the cells, and ferroportin, which exports iron from the cells (18). The degradation of iron storage proteins and changes in iron transporters can increase iron-mediated ROS production, eventually leading to ferroptosis (19). A study has shown that inducing ferroptosis can improve therapeutic effects in gefitinib-resistant lung cancer (20). In addition, another report has shown that inducing ferroptosis enhances the cytotoxicity of erlotinib in NSCLC cells, thereby overcoming erlotinib resistance (21), suggesting that inducing ferroptosis may be an effective treatment for EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC.
The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway is also associated with tumor development (22). Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), an important serine/threonine protein kinase downstream of PI3K/AKT, regulates the proliferation, survival, invasion and metastasis of tumor cells by activating ribosomal kinases (23). mTOR inhibitors (notably RAD001, an oral rapamycin derivative) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for wider use in antitumor clinical treatment, providing more treatment options for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), estrogen receptor+ + HER2− breast cancer and other solid tumors (24). A study has shown that RAD001 promotes the death of T790M+ NSCLC cells (25), suggesting that RAD001 is a potential treatment strategy for EGFR-TKI resistant tumors. In addition, inhibition of mTOR overcomes lapatinib resistance by inducing ferroptosis in NSCLC (26), suggesting that the regulation of mTOR may promote ferroptosis and overcome EGFR-TKI resistance. Other studies have shown that the induction of ferroptosis in wild-type EGFR NSCLC enhances the therapeutic effect of cisplatin (27) and overcomes cell resistance to gefitinib (28). A previous report also demonstrated that dual inhibition of the EGFR/mTOR pathway had a significant antitumor effect on wild-type EGFR NSCLC (29). However, whether mTOR inhibition enhances the antitumor effect in EGFR-TKI-resistant mutants and wild-type EGFR NSCLC by inducing ferroptosis and the related mechanisms remain unknown.
The present study investigated the effect and mechanism of targeting the mTOR pathway to regulate ferroptosis in NSCLC with EGFR wild-type, EGFR sensitive mutant cells and EGFR-resistant mutant cells through MTT assay, western blotting, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), ROS assay and MDA assay.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human NSCLC (H1975, A549 and H3255) cell lines were purchased from The Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of The Chinese Academy of Sciences and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator and routinely passaged every 3 days.
MTT assay
H1975, A549 and H3255 cells were seeded into 96-well plates with 4×103 cells/well and treated with various concentrations of RAD001 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 µM) or ferroptosis regulators, erastin (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 µM), ferrostatin-1 (0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 µM) and RSL3 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 µM). After 24 h, these cells were incubated with MTT reagent (20 µl/well) at 37°C for 4 h. Then the supernatant was replaced with 150 µl/well DMSO. This mixture was shaken for 10 min and the absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a CLARIOstarPlus microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH).
Western blotting
The H1975, A549 and H3255 cells with different doses of RAD001 or RSL3 treatment were lysed using RIPA lysis buffer containing the protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The supernatant was centrifuged at 15,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min and a BCA protein assay kit (Takara Bio, Inc.) was used to determine the concentration of proteins in the samples. The extracted protein (50 µg/lane) was mixed with 5X sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer (BioTeke Corporation), which was loaded in a 10% gel (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and the proteins were separated using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane and the membrane was blocked in 5% non-fat milk at 22–24°C for 1.5 h. The membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with different primary antibodies (listed below). After washing with TBS-1% Tween 20 for three times, the membranes were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies for 1 h at 22–24°C (listed below). The proteins were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (cat. no. P0018AS; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and analyzed with Quantity One software (version 4.6.9; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Primary antibodies against Caspase 3/Cleaved-Caspase 3 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9662; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), FTH1 (1:1,000; cat. no. 3998; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), transferrin (1:1,000; cat. no. ab109503; Abcam), transferrin receptor, CD71 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab84036; Abcam), ferroportin (1:1,000; cat. no. ab235166; Abcam), GPX4 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab125066; Abcam), phosphorylated (p-)mTOR (1:500; cat. no. 2971; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), mTOR (1:500; cat. no. 2972; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), AKT (1:1,000; cat. no. 9272; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 1:1,000; cat. no. ab9485; Abcam), and secondary antibodies against goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:1,000; cat. no. WLA023; Wanleibio Co., Ltd.) and goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1,000; cat. no. WLA024; Wanleibio Co., Ltd.) were used.
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
H1975, A549 and H3255 cells were seeded into a 6-well microplate at a density of 5×105 cells/well. Total RNA from the cells in each group was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After RNA quality was tested, cDNA was synthesized according to the manufacturer's protocols using a PrimeScript II Reverse Transcriptase kit (Takara Bio, Inc.). qPCR was then performed using a LightCycler 480 system (Roche Diagnostics) and a SYBR Green Master Kit (Takara Bio, Inc.). The reaction conditions were as follows: 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 57°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. GAPDH mRNA was used to normalize relative mRNA levels. The relative quantification of the PCR product was calculated, using the 2−ΔΔCq method (30). Primer sequences are listed in Table I.
ROS assay
H1975, A549 and H3255 cells with different doses of RAD001 treatment were seeded into a 6-well microplate at a density of 3×105 cells/well. After 24 h of treatment with RAD001 (0, 0.5, 1, 8 µM), the cells were collected, 10 µmol/l DCFH-DA was added and the reaction mixture and was incubated at 37°C for 20 min. The cells were then washed three times with serum-free cell culture medium of RPMI 1640 and the rate of ROS was detected using a flow cytometer (FACSCanto; BD Biosciences). The results were analysed using BD FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences).
MDA assay
H1975, A549 and H3255 cells with different doses of RAD001 treatment were seeded into a 6-well microplate at a density of 3×105 cells/well. After 24 h of treatment with RAD001 (0, 0.5, 1, 8 µM), the cells were collected and the levels of intracellular MDA were measured using a Lipid Peroxidation MDA Assay Kit (cat. no. S0131S; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc.) and GraphPad Prism (version 6.01; Dotmatics) software. Statistical data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the means among three or more groups. Dunnett's test was used for all comparisons against a single control. P-values were based on two-tailed statistical analyses. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Different EGFR genotypes of NSCLC have a different sensitivity to ferroptosis inducers
To explore the sensitivity of wild-type EGFR and EGFR-mutated NSCLC cells to ferroptosis, the expression levels of ferroptosis markers in H1975, A549 and H3255 cells were first detected. When compared with H3255 (EGFR L858R mutation) cells, the expression levels of FTH1, GPX4 and the transferrin receptor were higher and the level of transferrin was lower in H1975 (EGFR T790M/L858R) and A549 (EGFR wild type) cells (Fig. 1A). However, compared with H3255, the expression levels of xCT and ferroportin were notably higher in A549, but not H1975. When the A549, H1975 and H3255 cells were treated with the ferroptosis inducer, erastin, cell death was induced in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with H3255/A549 cells, H1975 cells were more sensitive to erastin (IC50: 15.66 µM vs. 6.989 µM vs. 13.83 µM, Fig. 1B). These results suggest that the NSCLC cell lines with wild-type EGFR and EGFR T790M/L858R mutations were more prone to erastin-induced ferroptosis.
Inhibition of mTOR may induce ferroptosis in EGFR-TKI resistant mutant and EGFR wild-type NSCLC
To explore whether RAD001 regulates ferroptosis in NSCLC with different EGFR mutations, H3255 (EGFR-TKI-sensitive), H1975 (EGFR-TKI-resistant) and A549 (EGFR wild-type) cells were treated with RAD001 at different concentrations. It was found that as the drug concentration increased, cell viability gradually decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Compared with H3255 cells, H1975 and A549 cells were more sensitive to RAD001 (IC50: 4.474 mM vs. 8.869 µM vs. 50.79 µM; Fig. 2A). Since ferroptosis is a form of apoptosis independent cell death, it was first tested whether different concentrations of RAD001 induce cell apoptosis, and then explored which concentration of RAD001 might induce ferroptosis. The three cell types were treated with low- and high-dose RAD001. Only 0.5 and 1 µΜ RAD001 treatment in A549 cells induced an increase in cleaved-Caspase3/Caspase3 (Fig. 2B-D). The three cell lines were then treated with RAD001, ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1) and RAD001 + Fer-1, respectively. The results showed that compared with RAD001 (1 µM) control, Fer-1 reduced the cell death induced by RAD001 (1 µM) in H1975 and A549 cells obviously. The difference was statistically significant. However, Fer-1 did not reverse cell death in H3255 cells (Fig. 2E-G).
mTOR inhibitor combined with an ferroptosis inducer promotes ferroptosis in EGFR resistant mutant and wild type EGFR NSCLC cells
The H3255, A549 and H1975 cells were treated with RAD001, erastin (ferroptosis inducer) and RAD001 + erastin, respectively. After 24 h, the results showed that erastin induced H1975, A549 and H3255 cell death in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, compared with H3255/A549 cells, H1975 cells were more sensitive to RAD001 combined with erastin. The IC50s of RAD001 (0.5 µM) + erastin were 15.15, 15.35 and 4.106 µM in H3255, A549 and H1975 cells, respectively. The IC50s of RAD001 (1 µM) + erastin were 15.87, 15.46 and 1.653 µM in H3255, A549 and H1975 cells, respectively (Fig. 3A-C).
Inhibiting mTOR promotes ferroptosis in EGFR resistant mutant and wild-type EGFR NSCLC cells by inducing lipid peroxidation
H3255, A549 and H1975 cells were treated with low or high concentrations of RAD001 (Fig. 4A-C). The results showed that 0.5, M and 8 µM of RAD001 inhibited mTOR activity by 56, 43 and 40% in A549 cells, respectively. In addition, 0.5, 1 and 8 µM of RAD001 inhibited mTOR activity by 5, 14 and 22% in H1975 cells, respectively. However, these concentrations of RAD001 did not inhibit mTOR activity in H3255 cells. It was found that 8 µΜ RAD001 significantly decreased the expression of GPX4, FTH1 and ferroportin by 43, 31 and 22%, respectively, in A549 cells and by 41, 29 and 26% in H1975 cells, respectively. However, RAD001 did not markedly alter GPX4, FTH1 or ferroportin expression in H3255 cells. Following treatment with different concentrations of RAD001 in A549, H3255 and H1975 cells for 4 h, high concentrations (8 µM) of RAD001 significantly induced the accumulation of ROS by 52, 33 and 55% in these three types of cells, respectively (Fig. 4D). Moreover, 8 µM RAD001 increased the level of MDA by 23% in A549 cells and by 31% in H1975 cells, respectively. However, 8 µM of RAD001 did not significantly alter MDA in H3255 cells (Fig. 4E). These results suggested that RAD001 induced lipid peroxidation in EGFR-resistant mutant and wild-type EGFR NSCLC cells by inhibiting mTOR, leading to ferroptosis.
Inhibition of GPX4 inhibits AKT/mTOR and promotes ferroptosis in EGFR resistant mutant NSCLC cells
To clarify the regulatory relationship between mTOR and GPX4, H3255, A549 and H1975 cells were treated with the GPX4 inhibitor, RSL3. The results showed that RSL3 notably inhibited cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, compared with A549 and H1975 cells, H3255 cells were the most sensitive to RSL3 (Fig. 5A). H1975, A549 and H3255 cells were also treated with different concentrations of RAD001 in combination with RSL3. Subsequent, western blotting showed that high-dose RAD001 markedly inhibited the AKT/mTOR pathway in H1975 and A549 cells compared with H3255 cells. High-dose RSL3 inhibited AKT/mTOR pathway notably in H1975 cells and the combination of RAD001 and RSL3 further enhanced the inhibitory effect on the AKT/mTOR pathway in this type of cells; however, this effect was not observed in A549 cells, possibly due to the low mTOR expression in A549 cells (Fig. 5B-D).
Discussion
TKIs have greatly changed the clinical prospects of patients with NSCLC with EGFR activation mutations (31). Although disease control is prolonged and the tumor response rate is high, all patients eventually progress after EGFR-TKI treatment (32). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel treatment strategies for these patients. In addition, if there are no co-mutations in driving genes such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1, it is difficult for patients with NSCLC with wild-type EGFR to benefit from targeted therapy. In the present study, compared with H3255 cells harboring the EGFR L858R mutation, H1975 cells with the EGFR T790M/L858R mutation and A549 cells with the EGFR wild-type mutation were more sensitive to the ferroptosis inducer, erastin, suggesting that targeted ferroptosis may be a potential treatment against EGFR T790M/L858R resistant mutant and wild-type NSCLC. In addition, A549 cells harbor the KRAS G12S mutation. KRAS mutation is a common carcinogenic driver mutation that accounts for ~35% of lung adenocarcinomas (33). Although sotorasib (AMG510), a drug targeting the KRAS G12C mutation, has been approved by the FDA as a second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with the KRAS G12C mutation (34), there are no approved targeted drugs for other KRAS mutation types (35). A study has shown that KRAS mutations are associated with EGFR-TKI resistance (36). In NSCLC, 15–30% of patients with adenocarcinoma have functional mutations in the KRAS gene, which means that the tumors in these patients do not respond to EGFR-TKIs (37). The targeted regulation of ferroptosis has a significant antitumor effect on EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs such as gefitinib (20). Therefore, based on the findings of the present and aforementioned studies, the regulation of ferroptosis may be an effective treatment strategy against tumors harboring KRAS G12S and EGFR-TKI resistance.
Abnormal activation of mTOR is common in a variety of cancer types such as lung adenocarcinoma, lymphoma and melanoma (38–40), and is related to its role as a key effector downstream of several carcinogenic pathways, such as PI3K/AKT and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, as well as tumor inhibitory pathways, such as p53 and LKB1 (38,41–44). A study has shown that mTOR is an important target for the regulation of ferroptosis in many types of tumor cells, like breast cancer and prostate cancer (45). The results of the present study showed that, compared with EGFR L858R mutant NSCLC, EGFR T790M/L858R and EGFR wild-type NSCLC were more sensitive to the mTOR inhibitor, RAD001. RAD001-induced cell death in these two cell types was reduced by the ferroptosis inhibitor, Fer-1. Data from a clinical study suggest that mTOR inhibitors, as single drugs, typically have relatively moderate therapeutic effects, possibly due to the lack of strong cytotoxic effects induced by these inhibitors (40). RAD001 has been approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, PNET and advanced breast cancer (46). However, designing an appropriate combination therapy to enhance the cytotoxicity induced by mTOR inhibition remains an unmet demand in clinical research (40). Recent preclinical studies have further proven that co-targeting mTOR and ferroptosis may be a promising cancer treatment strategy (45,47,48). The results of the present study showed that compared with EGFR L858R mutant NSCLC cells/EGFR wild-type NSCLC cells, EGFR T790M/L858R mutant NSCLC cells were more sensitive to RAD001 combined with the ferroptosis inducer, erastin, suggesting that the combination of mTOR inhibitor and erastin may be a potential treatment strategy for EGFR-resistant mutant NSCLC cells.
mTOR complex 1 mediates cystine-induced GPX4 protein synthesis, inhibits lipid peroxidation and protects cells from ferroptosis (40). The results of the present study showed that RAD001 markedly reduced mTOR activity in EGFR T790M/L858R mutant and wild-type NSCLC cells, resulting in decreased GPX4 protein levels and increased ROS levels. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms underlying the inhibition of mTOR-induced ferroptosis may be related to the accumulation of lipid peroxidation caused by the reduction in GPX4. In addition, the results of the present study demonstrated that the inhibition of mTOR not only changed the expression of GPX4 protein but also reduced the expression of the iron storage protein, FTH1, and the iron transporter, ferroportin. Since FTH1 and ferroportin have important roles in the regulation of iron metabolism in cells, their reduction can lead to iron metabolism disorders and induce ferroptosis (49). The results of the present study indicated that inhibition of mTOR induced ferroptosis in EGFR T790M/L858R mutant and wild-type NSCLC cells by inducing lipid peroxidation and iron metabolism disorder. In addition, the effect of GPX4 regulation on the AKT/mTOR pathway was observed and it was found that GPX4 inhibition effectively inhibited the AKT/mTOR pathway in H1975 cells. This may be related to the positive regulatory relationship between AKT/mTOR and GPX4 (50,51). Notably, compared with H1975 and A549 cells, H3255 cells were the most sensitive to the GPX4 inhibitor, RSL3, and the least sensitive to erastin, which may be related to the different mechanisms of these drugs. Erastin exerts a significant antitumor effect on wild-type EGFR cells by inducing ROS-mediated caspase-independent cell death (52). Erastin binds directly to voltage-dependent anion channel 2 and produces ROS in an NADH-dependent manner, leading to mitochondrial damage. In certain tumor cells with activated mutations, erastin induces cell death via the RAS/RAF/MEK pathway (53). Another study has shown that RSL3 inactivated GPX4, induced ROS production by lipid peroxidation and rapidly induced ferroptosis in RAS-mutant cells (54). Therefore, for NSCLC with different EGFR mutations, different drugs that regulate ferroptosis may be selected to achieve the most effective antitumor effects. There were certain limitations to the present study. In this study, H1975 (EGFR T790M/L858R), H3255 (EGFR L858R) and A549 (EGFR wild type) cells were selected to test our hypothesis. Experiments performed on other EGFR-mutant NSCLC types of cells would strengthen the significance of the present results and conclusion. The experiments using in vivo animal models could also provide more robust results. Moreover, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), squamous cell lung cancer or large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma cell lines were not screened. Bebber et al (55) reported that non-neuroendocrine SCLC is vulnerable to ferroptosis. In our ongoing study, it was found that, compared with neuroendocrine SCLC, non-neuroendocrine SCLC cells with upregulated GPX4 expression were not sensitive to mTOR inhibitors. Therefore, targeting mTOR may not induce ferroptosis by inhibiting GPX4 in SCLC. We will further explore the role and molecular mechanism of targeting mTOR to regulate ferroptosis in NSCLC, SCLC and large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma.
In conclusion, the sensitivity of different EGFR mutation types to ferroptosis was described in the present study and the induction of ferroptosis by targeting mTOR was confirmed to be a potential treatment strategy for EGFR T790M/L858R and wild-type EGFR NSCLC.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The work was supported by the Health and Family Planning Commission of Jilin Province (grant no. 2021JC095) and the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (grant no. YDZJ202301ZYTS512).
Availability of data and materials
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
Authors' contributions
YC, HL, CJW and RZ designed the study; RZ and TXW performed the experiments; RZ and CYH analyzed the data; CJW and RZ wrote the manuscript. YLJ performed flow cytometry. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. CJW and RZ confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2011: The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:212–236. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ochi N, Takeyama M, Miyake N, Fuchigami M, Yamane H, Fukazawa T, Nagasaki Y, Kawahara T, Nakanishi H and Takigawa N: The complexity of EGFR exon 19 deletion and L858R mutant cells as assessed by proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics. Exp Cell Res. 424:1135032023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hamaguchi R, Okamoto T, Sato M, Hasegawa M and Wada H: Effects of an alkaline diet on EGFR-TKI therapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Anticancer Res. 37:5141–5145. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lim SH, Lee JY, Sun JM, Ahn JS, Park K and Ahn MJ: Comparison of clinical outcomes following gefitinib and erlotinib treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in either exon 19 or 21. J Thorac Oncol. 9:506–511. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liang H, Pan Z, Wang W, Guo C, Chen D, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Tang S, He J and Liang W; written on behalf of AME Lung Cancer Cooperative Group, : The alteration of T790M between 19 del and L858R in NSCLC in the course of EGFR-TKIs therapy: A literature-based pooled analysis. J Thorac Dis. 10:2311–2320. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, Chen YM, Park K, Kim SW, Zhou C, Su WC, Wang M, Sun Y, et al: Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): A phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 13:528–538. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Walter AO, Sjin RT, Haringsma HJ, Ohashi K, Sun J, Lee K, Dubrovskiy A, Labenski M, Zhu Z, Wang Z, et al: Discovery of a mutant-selective covalent inhibitor of EGFR that overcomes T790M-mediated resistance in NSCLC. Cancer Discov. 3:1404–1415. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ward RA, Anderton MJ, Ashton S, Bethel PA, Box M, Butterworth S, Colclough N, Chorley CG, Chuaqui C, Cross DA, et al: Structure- and reactivity-based development of covalent inhibitors of the activating and gatekeeper mutant forms of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). J Med Chem. 56:7025–7048. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thress KS, Paweletz CP, Felip E, Cho BC, Stetson D, Dougherty B, Lai Z, Markovets A, Vivancos A, Kuang Y, et al: Acquired EGFR C797S mutation mediates resistance to AZD9291 in non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M. Nat Med. 21:560–562. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou F and Zhou CC: Targeted therapies for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR: What's new and what's enough. Chin J Cancer. 34:310–319. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JK, Hahn S, Kim DW, Suh KJ, Keam B, Kim TM, Lee SH and Heo DS: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors vs conventional chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer harboring wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 311:1430–1437. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JY, Kim WK, Bae KH, Lee SC and Lee EW: Lipid metabolism and ferroptosis. Biology (Basel). 10:1842021.PubMed/NCBI | |
Seibt TM, Proneth B and Conrad M: Role of GPX4 in ferroptosis and its pharmacological implication. Free Radic Biol Med. 133:144–152. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon SJ, Fulda S, Gascón S, Hatzios SK, Kagan VE, et al: Ferroptosis: A regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 171:273–285. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Badgley MA, Kremer DM, Maurer HC, DelGiorno KE, Lee HJ, Purohit V, Sagalovskiy IR, Ma A, Kapilian J, Firl CEM, et al: Cysteine depletion induces pancreatic tumor ferroptosis in mice. Science. 368:85–89. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wish JB: Assessing iron status: Beyond serum ferritin and transferrin saturation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 1 (Suppl 1):S4–S8. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hou W, Xie Y, Song X, Sun X, Lotze MT, Zeh HJ III, Kang R and Tang D: Autophagy promotes ferroptosis by degradation of ferritin. Autophagy. 12:1425–1428. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gkouvatsos K, Papanikolaou G and Pantopoulos K: Regulation of iron transport and the role of transferrin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1820:188–202. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fang X, Wang H, Han D, Xie E, Yang X, Wei J, Gu S, Gao F, Zhu N, Yin X, et al: Ferroptosis as a target for protection against cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116:2672–2680. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang C, Lu X, Liu X, Xu J, Li J, Qu T, Dai J and Guo R: Carbonic anhydrase IX controls vulnerability to ferroptosis in gefitinib-resistant lung cancer. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2023:13679382023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu C, Jiang ZB, Shao L, Zhao ZM, Fan XX, Sui X, Yu LL, Wang XR, Zhang RN, Wang WJ, et al: β-Elemene enhances erlotinib sensitivity through induction of ferroptosis by upregulating lncRNA H19 in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Pharmacol Res. 191:1067392023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vasan N, Razavi P, Johnson JL, Shao H, Shah H, Antoine A, Ladewig E, Gorelick A, Lin TY, Toska E, et al: Double PIK3CA mutations in cis increase oncogenicity and sensitivity to PI3Kα inhibitors. Science. 366:714–723. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aylett CH, Sauer E, Imseng S, Boehringer D, Hall MN, Ban N and Maier T: Architecture of human mTOR complex 1. Science. 351:48–52. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hasskarl J: Everolimus. Recent Results Cancer Res. 211:101–123. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fujiwara R, Taniguchi Y, Rai S, Iwata Y, Fujii A, Fujimoto K, Kumode T, Serizawa K, Morita Y, Espinoza JL, et al: Chlorpromazine cooperatively induces apoptosis with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated lung cancer cell lines and restores the sensitivity to gefitinib in T790M-harboring resistant cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 626:156–166. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ni J, Chen K, Zhang J and Zhang X: Inhibition of GPX4 or mTOR overcomes resistance to Lapatinib via promoting ferroptosis in NSCLC cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 567:154–160. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lou JS, Zhao LP, Huang ZH, Chen XY, Xu JT, Tai WC, Tsim KWK, Chen YT and Xie T: Ginkgetin derived from Ginkgo biloba leaves enhances the therapeutic effect of cisplatin via ferroptosis-mediated disruption of the Nrf2/HO-1 axis in EGFR wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer. Phytomedicine. 80:1533702021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yan WY, Cai J, Wang JN, Gong YS and Ding XB: Co-treatment of betulin and gefitinib is effective against EGFR wild-type/KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer by inducing ferroptosis. Neoplasma. 69:648–656. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang Y, Chen Y, Mei Q, Chen Y, Yu S and Xia S: Combined inhibition of the EGFR and mTOR pathways in EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer cell lines with different genetic backgrounds. Oncol Rep. 29:2486–2492. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Singh S, Sadhukhan S and Sonawane A: 20 Years since the approval of first EGFR-TKI, gefitinib: Insight and foresight. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1878:1889672023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Morimoto K, Yamada T, Takeda T, Shiotsu S, Date K, Tamiya N, Goto Y, Kanda H, Chihara Y, Kunimatsu Y, et al: Clinical efficacy and safety of first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs after osimertinib resistance for EGFR mutated lung cancer: A prospective exploratory study. Target Oncol. 18:657–665. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reck M, Carbone DP, Garassino M and Barlesi F: Targeting KRAS in non-small-cell lung cancer: Recent progress and new approaches. Ann Oncol. 32:1101–1110. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakajima EC, Drezner N, Li X, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Liu Y, Zhao H, Bi Y, Liu J, Rahman A, Wearne E, et al: FDA approval summary: Sotorasib for KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res. 28:1482–1486. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hofmann MH, Gerlach D, Misale S, Petronczki M and Kraut N: Expanding the reach of precision oncology by drugging all KRAS mutants. Cancer Discov. 12:924–937. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pao W, Wang TY, Riely GJ, Miller VA, Pan Q, Ladanyi M, Zakowski MF, Heelan RT, Kris MG and Varmus HE: KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib. PLoS Med. 2:e172005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rodenhuis S, Slebos RJ, Boot AJ, Evers SG, Mooi WJ, Wagenaar SS, van Bodegom PC and Bos JL: Incidence and possible clinical significance of K-ras oncogene activation in adenocarcinoma of the human lung. Cancer Res. 48:5738–5741. 1988.PubMed/NCBI | |
Saxton RA and Sabatini DM: mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 168:960–976. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu GY and Sabatini DM: mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 21:183–203. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lei G, Zhuang L and Gan B: mTORC1 and ferroptosis: Regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Bioessays. 43:e21000932021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng Z, Zhang H, Levine AJ and Jin S: The coordinate regulation of the p53 and mTOR pathways in cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:8204–8209. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shaw RJ, Bardeesy N, Manning BD, Lopez L, Kosmatka M, DePinho RA and Cantley LC: The LKB1 tumor suppressor negatively regulates mTOR signaling. Cancer Cell. 6:91–99. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Byun JK, Park M, Yun JW, Lee J, Kim JS, Cho SJ, Lee YM, Lee IK, Choi YK and Park KG: Oncogenic KRAS signaling activates mTORC1 through COUP-TFII-mediated lactate production. EMBO Rep. 20:e474512019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Prabowo AS, Iyer AM, Veersema TJ, Anink JJ, Schouten-van Meeteren AY, Spliet WG, van Rijen PC, Ferrier CH, Capper D, Thom M and Aronica E: BRAF V600E mutation is associated with mTOR signaling activation in glioneuronal tumors. Brain Pathol. 24:52–66. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yi J, Zhu J, Wu J, Thompson CB and Jiang X: Oncogenic activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling suppresses ferroptosis via SREBP-mediated lipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 117:31189–31197. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hua H, Kong Q, Zhang H, Wang J, Luo T and Jiang Y: Targeting mTOR for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 12:712019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Y, Swanda RV, Nie L, Liu X, Wang C, Lee H, Lei G, Mao C, Koppula P, Cheng W, et al: mTORC1 couples cyst(e)ine availability with GPX4 protein synthesis and ferroptosis regulation. Nat Commun. 12:15892021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Kang R and Tang D: Interplay between MTOR and GPX4 signaling modulates autophagy-dependent ferroptotic cancer cell death. Cancer Gene Ther. 28:55–63. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Muhoberac BB and Vidal R: Iron, Ferritin, hereditary ferritinopathy, and neurodegeneration. Front Neurosci. 13:11952019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jung KH, Kim SE, Go HG, Lee YJ, Park MS, Ko S, Han BS, Yoon YC, Cho YJ, Lee P, et al: Synergistic renoprotective effect of melatonin and zileuton by inhibition of ferroptosis via the AKT/mTOR/NRF2 signaling in kidney injury and fibrosis. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 31:599–610. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu Z and Li L, Li M, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Ran J and Li L: miR-21-5p inhibits ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by regulating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway through MELK. J Immunol Res. 2023:89295252023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yamaguchi H, Hsu JL, Chen CT, Wang YN, Hsu MC, Chang SS, Du Y, Ko HW, Herbst R and Hung MC: Caspase-independent cell death is involved in the negative effect of EGF receptor inhibitors on cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 19:845–854. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yagoda N, von Rechenberg M, Zaganjor E, Bauer AJ, Yang WS, Fridman DJ, Wolpaw AJ, Smukste I, Peltier JM, Boniface JJ, et al: RAS-RAF-MEK-dependent oxidative cell death involving voltage-dependent anion channels. Nature. 447:864–868. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xie Y, Hou W, Song X, Yu Y, Huang J, Sun X, Kang R and Tang D: Ferroptosis: Process and function. Cell Death Differ. 23:369–379. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bebber CM, Thomas ES, Stroh J, Chen Z, Androulidaki A, Schmitt A, Höhne MN, Stüker L, de Pádua Alves C, Khonsari A, et al: Ferroptosis response segregates small cell lung cancer (SCLC) neuroendocrine subtypes. Nat Commun. 12:20482021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |