
Rare multiple schwannomas of the left upper extremity: A case report
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 4, 2025 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2025.14952
- Article Number: 205
-
Copyright: © Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Schwannomas, also referred to as neurilemmomas, are the most common type of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor (BPNST), originating from Schwann cells and present predominantly in the hands and upper limbs (1–4). While PNSTs are rare, schwannomas are the most prevalent type, accounting for nearly 5% of all soft-tissue tumors of the upper limb (5). The global incidence of schwannomas is reported to be 3–4 cases per million individuals (6). As BPNSTs, schwannomas typically grow slowly, with a relatively low incidence of malignant transformation, generally ranging from 1 to 13% (7). Therefore, the prognosis for the vast majority of patients is favorable, and the mortality rate is relatively low. However, for patients at risk of malignant transformation, especially those with pathogenic genes (such as NF2, SMARCB1 and LZTR1), there may be a higher risk of complications (8). Approximately 19% of all cases of schwannomas occur in the upper limb, with the distal region near the elbow being the most common tumor site (9). These tumors tend to originate along major nerves and on the flexor surfaces of the upper and lower limbs (10,11). Surgical intervention has been reported as the primary treatment and is relatively effective for schwannomas (12). However, to the best of our knowledge, studies on multiple schwannomas in the upper limb are scarce. The rarity of this condition and the ambiguity in the diagnostic criteria may lead to an underestimation of the actual incidence of multiple schwannomas. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct standardized studies on multiple schwannomas in the upper limb, including studies on diagnosis, surgical management and postoperative care. In this context, the present study discusses the case of a patient with multiple schwannomas in the upper limb. This report also includes a brief review of the literature on the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of schwannomas, with the objective of providing novel insights into their management.
Case report
A 70-year-old man presented at Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou, China) in January 2024 with a mass in the left upper limb that had existed for >40 years. Initially, this mass was solid and oval in shape, measuring ~1×2 cm on the medial aspect of the left upper limb. No specific treatment was received for the mass. Over the past 20 years, the mass had progressively enlarged, and new masses have developed near the left elbow and the hypothenar region. The patient reported no pain or tenderness, and all the masses were cystic-solid upon palpation. The results of the neurological examination were unremarkable. The masses were mobile in the transverse plane but not along the longitudinal axis. The overlying skin exhibited no signs of redness, swelling or ulceration, and no increase in skin temperature was noted. No family member had a history of schwannomas. Given these observations, it was plausible to conclude that this case was more likely to represent a sporadic schwannoma.
The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination conducted upon admission revealed two ovoid masses located in the ulnar nerve path in the middle to distal part of the left upper arm, with slight hyperintensity on T1-weighted images and heterogeneous hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. The masses were ~4.2×5.8×6.1 and 5.0×5.6×6.5 cm in size. The T2-weighted images revealed target signs, with the masses closely related to the nerve. No signal suppression was noted on fat-saturated sequences, and the enhancement of the masses was heterogeneous, with progressive enhancement on delayed-phase imaging. The adjacent muscles exhibited signs of compression displacement with distinct delineations. In addition, long ovoid nodular lesions with similar signal characteristics were observed on the radial side of the flexor tendon sheath close to the wrist and superficial to the thenar muscles on the volar aspect of the left forearm. These lesions were ~1.4×2.8 and 3.0×3.7×5.1 cm in size, respectively, and exhibited marked heterogeneous enhancement on contrast-enhanced images (Fig. 1).
The patient underwent excision of the left upper limb mass, median nerve exploration and pathological biopsy under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. A longitudinal incision was made along the long axis of the tumor, followed by an incision on the skin and subcutaneous tissue. The tumor was bluntly dissected and exposed. A capsule was observed, although it was a focal discontinuity. The tumor adhered to the surrounding skeletal muscle and the median nerve, which was most consistent with a benign neurogenic tumor. Careful dissection of the surrounding nerves, blood vessels and tendons was performed. The tumor dimensions from proximal to distal were 6×5×3, 5×4×3.5 and 5×3.5×3 cm, respectively (Fig. 2). The incision was closed in layers, and the tumors were sent for pathological evaluation. The postoperative course remained uneventful, and complete tumor resection was achieved without any damage to the surrounding nerves. The patient exhibited no sensory or circulatory abnormalities in the surgical region or the distal limb, and no complications occurred. The patient was, therefore, discharged with a healed incision.
Postoperative pathological examination revealed the following gross findings: i) Subcutaneous mass no. 1 in the left upper limb: A grayish-red to grayish-white mass measuring 6×5×3 cm, with the excised surface exhibiting grayish-red to grayish-white coloration and soft consistency. ii) Subcutaneous mass no. 2 in the left upper limb: A grayish-red to grayish-white mass measuring 5×4×3.5 cm in size, with the excised surface exhibiting grayish-red to grayish-yellow coloration, a moderate texture and associations with regions of hemorrhage. iii) Subcutaneous mass no. 3 in the left upper limb: A grayish-red mass measuring 5×3.5×3 cm, with a tail 5 cm in length and ~1 cm in diameter, exhibiting a grayish-red to grayish-yellow excised surface with a soft consistency and solid texture. After tissue sampling, fixation with 10% neutral formalin at room temperature for 8 h, dehydration, embedding with paraffin, sectioning at a thickness of 4 µm and staining, the prepared slides were examined under a Nikon Eclipse CI optical microscope (Nikon Corporation). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on the prepared slides. After dewaxing and rehydrating at room temperature, the slides were stained with hematoxylin for 3 min, differentiated and rinsed before being stained with eosin for 9 min. Following rinsing, dehydration and clearing, the slides were baked at 67°C for 15 min, dried for 10 min and then mounted for observation. H&E staining revealed typical fascicular regions (Antoni A regions) and reticular regions (Antoni B regions). The Antoni A regions contained spindle-shaped cells arranged in fascicular and palisading patterns, with Verocay bodies, with a few regions densely packed, while other regions were more loosely arranged, with visible blood vessels. The Antoni B regions presented with hemosiderin deposition around the blood vessels, along with chronic hemorrhage and cystic changes, suggesting a degenerative schwannoma. Mild nuclear atypia (degenerative changes) was observed in some cells, with no increased mitotic activity. The stroma showed loose myxoid changes, with abundant vascular structures exhibiting congestion and hemorrhage, accompanied by fibrosis, hyaline degeneration and localized calcification, indicating a degenerative schwannoma (Fig. 3A-D). To accurately describe the tumor components, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on several representative paraffin block sections using the ChemMate Envision method (DakoCytomation; Agilent Technologies, Inc.). IHC was performed using a ready-to-use ChemMate Envision kit from DakoCytomation; Agilent Technologies, Inc., [Kit details: Anti-p53 (DO-7) monoclonal antibody, cat. no. M7001; anti-Ki-67 (30–9) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody, cat. no. 790-4286; S100 antibody, cat. no. CSM-0101] following the manufacturer's instructions. The immunohistochemistry analysis revealed positive expression for S100, p53 (~2%) and Ki-67 (hotspot region ~2%). S-100 immunohistochemical staining showed positivity in both the cytoplasm and nuclei of tumor cells, with some regions primarily exhibiting cytoplasmic positivity, while others demonstrated both cytoplasmic and nuclear dual positivity, suggesting that the latter may indicate higher tumor activity. p53 immunohistochemical staining demonstrated focal positivity in scattered tumor cells with variable staining intensity, showing colors ranging from light to dark brown. Immunohistochemical staining revealed a Ki-67 proliferation index of 2%, indicating the presence of tumor cells (Fig. 3E-H). Based on the histological morphology of schwannomas in the microscopic examination section of the third edition of ‘Diagnostic Pathology: Soft Tissue Tumors’ (13), the pathological diagnosis was established as multiple schwannomas of the left upper limb with secondary degenerative hemorrhage. During the 1-year postoperative follow-up period, the patient underwent seven clinical examinations. The surgical wounds healed well without significant complications, and physical examinations revealed no evidence of tumor recurrence.
Discussion
Schwannomas are non-invasive tumors of the peripheral nerve sheath. Studies have indicated that schwannomas are the most common PNSTs in the upper limb, with an incidence rate of 64% (12). No significant sex or ethnicity differences have been noted in this context (14). In a 22-year epidemiological study conducted by Sandberg et al (12), which studied a total of 68 tumors in 53 patients, the median nerve was revealed to be the most frequently affected nerve, followed by the ulnar and digital nerves.
Research has shown that schwannomatosis and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) are both characterized by multiple schwannomas but represent distinct genetic entities. NF2 is caused by mutations in the NF2 gene, whereas schwannomatosis is associated with germline mutations in SMARCB1 or LZTR1 (15). In the epidemiological study on schwannomas by Forde et al (16), the prevalence of LZTR1-related schwannomatosis and SMARCB1-related schwannomatosis was ~1 in 527,000 and ~1 in 1,100,000, respectively, which is 8.4 to 18.4 times lower than the prevalence of NF2. This highlights the significant role of NF2 in the genetic diagnosis of schwannomas (17). In the present case, due to the need for outsourcing high-throughput sequencing, the associated costs and the patient's personal preferences, genetic sequencing could not be performed to confirm the presence of any alterations in the NF2 gene.
The clinical presentation of schwannomas varies notably. Certain reports indicate that these tumors may be painless, although this lack of pain may be attributed to their slow growth, indirect compression of the nerve and absence of sensory innervation in the tumor (18–21). A comprehensive retrospective analysis by Iwashita, which examined 1,202 patients with 1,271 schwannomas, demonstrated a notably low incidence of pain. The histopathological classification of the patients revealed several distinct types: Common (n=932), degenerative (n=238), cellular (n=19), plexiform (n=35), pigmented (n=2), myxoma (n=16) and organoid (n=30), with pain manifestation predominantly observed in myxoma and organoid variants (19). Additionally, symptoms such as pain, sensory abnormalities and a positive Tinel's sign are often associated with the location of the tumor. As the tumor grows and compresses more sensitive nerve regions, the patient may experience pain or other symptoms. A review of the literature on patients with schwannomas in the hand and wrist revealed that the interval between symptom onset and surgery ranged from a few months to 37 years (14). Tumors located in the finger regions tend to cause symptoms earlier than those located in the wrist and the palm. In the present case, the combination of the patient's 40-year clinical history and subsequent histopathological findings from H&E staining strongly indicated a degenerative variant of schwannoma (19).
When considering differential diagnoses, it is important to identify benign tumors that could be confused with schwannomas. The tumors that should be distinguished from schwannomas include neurofibromas, neuroblastomas and ganglioneuromas. Clinically, no distinct standard exists for differentiating schwannomas from neurofibromas. However, the literature suggests that the primary distinction between the two lies in the age of the patients in which they occur, as while neurofibromas predominantly originate in individuals aged 20–30 years, schwannomas are more common in those aged 30–50 years (12,14). Nevertheless, distinguishing schwannomas from other tumors based solely on clinical history and imaging findings remains considerably challenging.
Ultrasound examination may be utilized to establish a preoperative diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors in the extremities. According to reports, an accuracy rate of up to 77% may be achieved when ultrasound is used as an initial diagnostic modality (22). Ultrasound, however, is unable to differentiate between schwannomas and other tumors, as all tumors typically present as similar hypoechoic masses with posterior acoustic enhancement. Typically, uncharacterized soft-tissue masses in the upper limb that are suspected to be related to PNSTs require further evaluation through MRI examination, which reportedly has 75% diagnostic accuracy in the case of these tumors (23). Schwannomas typically present a homogeneous central low signal and a peripheral high signal, referred to as the target sign, although this is not exclusive to schwannomas (22). While MRI is more accurate for determining tumor location and establishing the differential diagnosis of schwannomas, it does not achieve 100% diagnostic accuracy. In addition, fine-needle aspiration or open biopsy is unsuitable for a definitive diagnosis, as these procedures may lead to scarring and potential fascicular injury during subsequent excision (11). Therefore, despite the availability of appropriate clinical and imaging evidence, the definitive diagnosis of schwannomas continues to rely on histopathological examination.
Currently, no pharmacological therapies are recommended as alternatives to surgery for the treatment of schwannomatosis (24). In asymptomatic schwannomas that are stable in size, a period of observation may be appropriate. In the management of benign schwannomas, therapists prefer to perform complete excision of the tumor along with its capsule, as recurrence is often observed in different regions of the same nerve in the affected limb rather than at the surgical site (25). The optimal surgical approach involves microsurgical techniques for intralesional dissection and meticulous tumor removal aimed at preserving nerve structures while minimizing traction on the surrounding nerve bundles (2,14,26,27).
Overall, a review of the relevant literature and the findings of the present case indicate that patients with schwannomas commonly present with soft-tissue masses, which may be accompanied by symptoms that develop due to nerve compression. Schwannomas originate from Schwann cells located within the nerve sheath and are often easily separable from the nerve. The present report highlights the fact that schwannomas can be multifocal and affect different regions of the body. A thorough examination of the peripheral nerves in patients with schwannomas is therefore essential, and a complete dissection should be performed to obtain a biopsy and thereby confirm that the tumor is not malignant. The potential for tumor recurrence underscores the necessity for routine follow-up examinations of affected patients.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Yanmei Li (Department of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangdong, China) for providing radiography consultations.
Funding
This research was supported by the Guangzhou Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (grant no. 202102010111) and the Guangzhou Municipal Key Discipline in Medicine.
Availability of data and materials
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
Authors' contributions
DY conceived and designed the study, and revised the manuscript. HC collected and analyzed the patient's clinical, imaging and pathological data, and drafted the manuscript. XY and PW performed the surgeries, provided detailed surgical descriptions, and contributed to the refinement of the manuscript's conception, design and content. WY, YL, WL, YT, and JL contributed to the writing of specific sections of the manuscript, assisted in the development of the study's methodology, analyzed data and prepared the pathological images for analysis. YX and HM contributed to the overall study design, critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content, and oversaw the processing and presentation of the figures. YY independently analyzed the radiological images, identified key diagnostic features and drafted the radiological findings section of the manuscript. LL performed the histopathological examination, conducted the immunohistochemical staining, interpreted the results and drafted the pathology section of the manuscript. HC, XY, PW and DY confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript, and have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
The patient provided specific written informed consent for publication, which included the acquisition of clinical data and images.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Hsu CS, Hentz VR and Yao J: Tumours of the hand. Lancet Oncol. 8:157–166. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lai CS, Chen IC, Lan HC, Lu CT, Yen JH, Song DY and Tang YW: Management of extremity neurilemmomas: Clinical series and literature review. Ann Plast Surg. 71 (Suppl 1):S37–S42. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Longhurst WD and Khachemoune A: An unknown mass: The differential diagnosis of digit tumors. Int J Dermatol. 54:1214–1225. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Payne WT and Merrell G: Benign bony and soft tissue tumors of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 35:1901–1910. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Holdsworth BJ: Nerve tumours in the upper limb A clinical review. J Hand Surg. 10:236–238. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Petrov M, Sakelarova T and Gerganov V: Other nerve sheath tumors of brain and spinal cord. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1405:363–376. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Junxiao G and Qianhui Q: Diagnosis and surgical treatment of head and neck Schwannomas. Intern J Otolaryngol-Head and Neck Surg. 43:216–219. 2019.(In Chinese). | |
Magro G, Broggi G, Angelico G, Puzzo L, Vecchio GM, Virzì V, Salvatorelli L and Ruggieri M: Practical approach to histological diagnosis of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: An update. Diagnostics (Basel). 12:14632022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Das Gupta TK, Brasfield RD, Strong EW and Hajdu SI: Benign solitary Schwannomas (neurilemomas). Cancer. 24:355–366. 1969. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang HJ, Shin SJ and Kang ES: Schwannomas of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Br. 25:604–607. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Russell SM: Preserve the nerve: Microsurgical resection of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neurosurgery. 61 (3 Suppl):S113–S117; discussion 117–118. 2007. | |
Sandberg K, Nilsson J, Soe Nielsen N and Dahlin LB: Tumours of peripheral nerves in the upper extremity: A 22-year epidemiological study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 43:43–49. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lindberg M: Diagnostic Pathology: Soft Tissue Tumors. 3rd Edition. Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA: 2019 | |
Ozdemir O, Ozsoy MH, Kurt C, Coskunol E and Calli I: Schwannomas of the hand and wrist: Long-term results and review of the literature. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 13:267–272. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Kluwe L, Friedrich RE, Summerer A, Schäfer E, Wahlländer U, Matthies C, Gugel I, Farschtschi S, Hagel C, et al: Phenotypic and genotypic overlap between mosaic NF2 and schwannomatosis in patients with multiple non-intradermal schwannomas. Hum Genet. 137:543–552. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Forde C, Smith MJ, Burghel GJ, Bowers N, Roberts N, Lavin T, Halliday J, King AT, Rutherford S, Pathmanaban ON, et al: NF2-related schwannomatosis and other schwannomatosis: An updated genetic and epidemiological study. J Med Genet. 61:856–860. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim BH, Chung YH, Woo TG, Kang SM, Park S, Kim M and Park BJ: NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2): Molecular insights and therapeutic avenues. Int J Mol Sci. 25:65582024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khodaee M and Langston L: A painless finger mass. J Musculoskel Neuron. 12:189–191. 2012. | |
Iwashita T: Neurilemmoma of the soft tissues: An analysis of 1,271 tumors in an attempt at subtyping. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 80:355–367. 1989.(In Japanese). PubMed/NCBI | |
Martin AE, Martin D, Sandu AM, Neacsu A, Rata O, Gorgan C and Gorgan MR: Nerve sheath tumor, benign neurogenic slow-growing solitary neurilemmoma of the left ulnar nerve: A case and review of literature. Rom Neurosur. 30:219–229. 2016. | |
Pinho R, Santana S, Farinha F, Cunha I, Barcelos A and Brenha J: Shoulder giant schwannoma-a diagnosis to be considered in painless shoulder masses. Acta Reumatol Port. 42:332–333. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hung YW, Tse WL, Cheng HS and Ho PC: Surgical excision for challenging upper limb nerve sheath tumours: A single centre retrospective review of treatment results. Hong Kong Med J. 16:287–291. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nilsson J, Sandberg K, Soe Nielsen N and Dahlin LB: Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral nerve tumours in the upper extremity. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 43:153–159. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Plotkin SR, Blakeley JO, Evans DG, Hanemann CO, Hulsebos TJ, Hunter-Schaedle K, Kalpana GV, Korf B, Messiaen L, Papi L, et al: Update from the 2011 International Schwannomatosis Workshop: From genetics to diagnostic criteria. Am J Med Genet A. 161A:405–416. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Spinner RJ: Complication avoidance. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 15:193–202. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang X, Peng C, Yorkashjan M, Li Y, Kong W, Maimaitiali T and Zhao Y: Microscope-assisted treatment of rare schwannoma of median nerve: 1 case. J Pract Hand Surg. 35:543–544. 2021. | |
Maimaitiali T, Kong W, Huang X, Peng C, Li Y and Zhao Y: Microscopic technique in the treatment of proximal thenar ulnar schwannoma in 1 case. J Pract Hand Surg. 36:569–570. 2022.(In Chinese). |