The effect of G-CSF on F-actin reorganization in HL-60 and K562 cell lines
- Authors:
- Published online on: September 26, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.2061
- Pages: 2138-2148
Abstract
Introduction
Cytokines are a large group of soluble extracellular proteins or glycoproteins, which are involved in many essential cellular processes, including cell growth, death, differentiation, angiogenesis and regulation of normal hematopoiesis (1). One of the types of glycoproteins, well-known since 1960, is granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), now also referred as CSF3 (2,3). G-CSF is mainly produced by hematopoietic cells but also by bone marrow stromal cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and macrophages (4). G-CSF promotes several cellular processes such as proliferation, maturation and differentiation. In addition, CSF3 regulates the survival of mature granulocytes and enhances chemotaxis, motility and phagocytosis of mature neutrophils (2–6). This cytokine interacts with the specific cell receptor G-CSFR, which belongs to the cytokine receptor type I superfamily and is expressed on the surface of early myeloid progenitors, mature granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages (3). The G-CSF gene was cloned in 1984 and allowed the production of recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) (7). The recombinant human protein consists of two forms: the first form is a 174-amino acid glycosylated molecule called Lenograstim and the second one is a smaller non-glycosylated 175-amino acid molecule called G-CSF (7,8). Both were established as useful clinical agents that are aimed at increasing the level of granulocytes after the chemotherapy or radiotherapy (7,9,10).
It has been shown that the reorganization of the cytoskeleton takes place during cell proliferation, maturation and differentiation (11–14). Actin filaments are a major component of the cytoskeleton, which plays an important role in the cellular processes such as cell migration, growth, cytokinesis, endocytosis, determination of cell shape and vesicle trafficking. In cells, actin is found both in a monomeric form (G-actin) and in the form of filaments (F-actin), which can be arranged in bundles or networks (15–19). The cytoplasmic functions of actin are well investigated. However, the role and location of actin in the cell nucleus has been controversial for decades. The first evidence for the presence of actin in the nucleus was presented almost 40 years ago, but was treated with skepticism (20,21). In recent years, it was demonstrated that actin and actin-binding proteins play an important role in diverse nuclear activities. Actin was discovered as a component of chromatin remodeling complex.
It was also observed that nuclear actin is associated with the RNA transcription machineries, long-range chromatin organization and newly synthesized ribonucleoproteins (RNP) (22–26). Nowadays, it is well known that the pool of cytoplasmatic and nuclear actin undergoes various alterations (27–29). Early studies of the effect of G-CSF showed only the reorganization of actin cytoskeleton as a consequence of morphological changes in human neutrophils (30). Moreover, it has been shown that this effect is dependent on the kind of used recombinant human G-CSF (glycosylated or non-glycosylated) (8). Xu et al demonstrated the translocation of actin from the cytoplasm to the nucleus during macrophage differentiation of HL-60 cells (29). In contrast to the HL-60 cell line, the K562 cell line seems to have no detectable G-CSF receptors and the effect of G-CSF on this line has not been fully understood so far. Nevertheless, El-Sonbaty et al showed the influence of G-CSF on the K562 cell line based on the plasmid-induced expression of G-CSFR (31–33).
The aim of our studies was to show the influence of non-glycosylated form of rhG-CSF on the F-actin cytoskeleton and the morphology of HL-60 and K562 cell lines during their differentiation.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The human leukemia cell line HL-60 (ATCC CCL-240) and erythroleukemia cell line K562 (ATCC CCL-243) were used in the present study. Both cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 50 μg/ml gentamycin, in a fully humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells were incubated with 5 and 10 ng/ml concentrations of non-glycosylated G-CSF (Amgen Europe B.V.) for 24 h. Control cells were grown under identical conditions, in the absence of growth factors.
Isolation of nuclei
For analysis of nuclear F-actin content, the isolation of nuclei was performed. After washing with PBS and centrifugation, the cells were incubated with homogenizing buffer consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 0.3 M sucrose; 5 mM CaCl2; 5 mM MgCl2; 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; and 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet-P40 substitute (Sigma-Aldrich).
After the homogenization on ice, the cell suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was decanted. The sediment was suspended in 1 ml of homogenized buffer and placed on the top of the buffer for purification of nuclei, which consists of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 0.3 M sucrose; 5 mM KCl; 5 mM MgCl2; 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich); and 41% glycerol (Roth). Following centrifugation, the nuclei were washed with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Serva).
Classical fluorescence and confocal microscopy
Control cells and cells treated with G-CSF were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Serva) for 20 min, washed three times with PBS and centrifuged onto glass slides. Cells on slides were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min and washed with PBS. Next, the cells were incubated with phalloidin conjugated to Alexa Fluor® 488 (Invitrogen, 1:40) for 20 min, at room temperature (RT). Nuclear staining was performed with 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich, 100 ng/ml) for 10 min. After counter-staining, the cells were rinsed with PBS and mounted in Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences Inc.). The cells were examined using an Eclipse E800 fluorescence microscope (Nikon) and C1 confocal microscope (Nikon).
Flow cytometry
Cytoplasmic and nuclear F-actin staining
Cells and isolated nuclei were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and afterwards rinsed three times with PBS. Then, the cells and nuclei were stained for F-actin with phalloidin conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, 1:40) for 20 min. After washing with PBS, DNA was labeled with 7-aminoactinomycin (7-AAD, Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min in RT. All reaction steps, during which the fluorochrome was used, were performed in the dark. The samples were analyzed using Becton-Dickinson FACScan flow cytometer.
Cell cycle analysis
The cells were stained with PI solution consisting of 50 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI) and 0.03% (v/v) nonylphenylpolyethylene glycol (Nonidet-P40 substitute; Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min in the dark (RT). After centrifugation and supernatant removal, the cells were incubated with RNase A solution for 15 min in the dark (RT). The percentage of cells in respective phases of the cell cycle was analyzed by Becton-Dickinson FACScan flow cytometer.
Double-staining with Annexin V and 7-AAD
In order to detect the apoptotic and necrotic cell death, cells were stained with using the Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection kit (BD Biosciences Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After washing with PBS, the supernatant was incubated with 195 μl of Annexin V binding buffer and 5 μl of Annexin V-FITC. Following the 15-min incubation in the dark (RT) and centrifugation, the cells were incubated with 190 μl of Annexin V binding buffer and 10 μl of 7-AAD for 5 min in the dark. Then cells were detected by Becton-Dickinson FACScan flow cytometer.
Transmission electron microscopy
For observation of the morphology and ultrastructure of HL-60 and K562 cells, a transmission electron microscopy was used. The control cells and cells treated with G-CSF were washed with PBS and fixed in 3.6% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (Merck) for 30 min (RT). After washing with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich), the cells were entrapped in fibrin clot and postfixed in 2% (w/v) OsO4 (Serva) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 h (RT). Then the cells were passed through a series of ethanol and acetone solutions and embedded in Epon 812 (Roth). Ultrathin sections were cut and double-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The samples were examined using a JEM 100CX transmission electron microscope (JEOL).
In order to determine the localization of F-actin at the ultrastructural level, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min (RT), washed three times with PBS and incubated with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. Then, the cells were rinsed with PBS and treated with endogenous biotin blocking kit (Invitrogen) and 6% BSA in PBS (bovine serum albumin, Sigma Aldrich) for 1 h (RT). Next, the cells were incubated for 20 min with biotinylated phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:85 from stock solution. This step was followed by rinsing with PBS, postfixation in 2% (w/v) OsO4 (Serva), dehydration in series of ethanol and embedding in LR White. After the LR White polymerization, the samples were cut by the ultramicrotome and collected on nickel grids (Sigma). Then, cells were treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min and three times with 0.001% Tween-20 in TBS. F-actin was stained for 1 h in the dark using Qdots® 525 streptavidin conjugate (Invitrogen) diluted 1:50 in PBS. The preparations were examined using a JEM 100CX (JEOL) transmission electron microscope.
Statistical analysis
To determine the differences between control cells and cells treated with G-CSF, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used. Results were considered significant at P<0.05.
Results
Fluorescent staining of F-actin
The reorganization of F-actin cytoskeleton in HL-60 and K562 cell lines after treatment with G-CSF was estimated using phalloidin conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. It was shown that in HL-60 control cells, the F-actin fluorescence was increased on the cell periphery. There were also observed low fluorescence signals in the form of small aggregates in the cytoplasm (Figs. 1A′, A″ and 2A, A′). Visualization of actin filaments in HL-60 cells treated with the lowest dose of G-CSF (5 ng/ml) in both classical fluorescence and confocal microscope, revealed a higher fluorescence intensity in whole cells, compared to the control. In these cells small aggregates and short fibers of F-actin were formed (Figs. 1B′, B″ and 2B, B′). At 10 ng/ml concentration of G-CSF, the reorganization of F-actin was more evident and much more networks and aggregates of actin were observed, compared to the control cells and cells treated with the lowest G-CSF dose (Figs. 1C′, C″ and 2C, C′). Moreover, at both doses of G-CSF, only few cells with apoptotic features were observed (Fig. 1B and C).
In K562 control cells, many different forms of F-actin were observed. Beside the high fluorescence intensity on the cell periphery, the F-actin formed small aggregates and a network in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1D′ and D″). In the area of the cell nucleus, the fluorescence intensity of F-actin was high in form of aggregates (Fig. 2D and D′). After treatment with 5 ng/ml of G-CSF a cytoplasmic F-actin labeling, in the form of aggregates and networks, was seen (Fig. 1E′ and E″), however, nuclear staining was decreased (Fig. 2E and E′). After 10 ng/ml of G-CSF, F-actin labeling was also decreased in both cytoplasm and cell nucleus, as compared to control (Fig. 2F and F′). DAPI staining showed that only few nuclei of cells treated with the highest dose of G-CSF displayed apoptotic features (Fig. 1D–F) and these cells were characterized by low fluorescence intensity of F-actin (Fig. 1E″ and F″). High signal of F-actin fluorescence in giant HL-60 and K562 cells was also observed (Fig. 1C′, C″, F′ and F″).
Transmission electron microscopy
HL-60 and K562 cells were examined by transmission electron microscopy. The ultrastructure of HL-60 cells, after treatment with both doses of G-CSF, was unchanged. The control cells and cells incubated with G-CSF showed normal morphology with an oval nucleus. There were no changes observed in mitochondria, Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 3A–C). K562 cells morphology after treatment with the lowest dose of G-CSF, was comparable to the control (Fig. 3D and E). However, in few K562 cells treated with 10 ng/ml of G-CSF multi-lobular nuclei were noted (Fig. 3F).
F-actin was also visualized at the ultrastructural level using biotinylated phalloidin and Qdots semiconductor nanocrystals conjugated with streptavidin. Quantum dots were found in control cells and cells treated with all doses of G-CSF. In HL-60 control cells, nanocrystals were observed in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 4A). After treatment with 5 ng/ml of G-CSF, a lot of Qdots were localized mainly in the cytoplasm. In the nucleus, single aggregates of nanocrystals were observed close to the heterochromatin and nuclear membrane (Fig. 4B). In HL-60 cells incubated with 10 ng/ml of G-CSF only few aggregates of Qdots were localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 4C). In K562 control cells, the Qdots were observed mainly in the nucleus close to the heterochromatin (Fig. 5A). After treatment of K562 cells with 5 and 10 ng/ml of G-CSF nanocrystals were seen in both cytoplasm and nucleus. However, the number of nanomolecules in the nucleus was smaller than in the control (Fig. 5B and C). Moreover, after treatment with 10 ng/ml of G-CSF, the number of Qdots in cytoplasm was greater. For negative control, the cells were incubated as previously described but without biotinyled phalloidin (Fig. 4D).
Flow cytometric analysis
F-actin staining
Flow cytometric analysis after the G-CSF treatment demonstrated quantitative changes in F-actin fluorescence staining both in whole cells and isolated nuclei in comparison to the control. There were not observed statistically significant differences in the percentage of F-actin-positive cells incubated with G-CSF in comparison to the control cells. The levels of F-actin ranged from 99 to 100% in HL-60 cell line and in K562 cells from 91 to 96% (Figs. 6A and 7A). The significant increase (P<0.05) of F-actin level in HL-60 cells was observed only after exposure to 5ng/ml of G-CSF (Fig. 6B). At 10 ng/ml of G-CSF, the fluorescence intensity was comparable to the control (Fig. 6B). In whole K562 cells, the statistically significant differences in fluorescence intensity of F-actin were not observed (Fig. 7B).
In the case of cell nuclei treated with G-CSF, there were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of F-actin-positive nuclei in both cell lines and in F-actin fluorescence intensity in isolated HL-60 nuclei (Figs. 6C, D and 7C). Whereas in K562 cell nuclei, the fluorescence intensity of F-actin decreased in a dose-dependent manner (it was the lowest after treatment with 10 ng/ml concentration) and statistically significant differences were observed (Fig. 7D).
Cell cycle analysis
In order to examine the effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on HL-60 and K562 cell cycle progression, standard and widely used method that employs PI/RNase was applied. Accordingly, there was observed a statistically significant increase in the mean percentage of cells in G0/G1 and sub-G1 phases after treatment of HL-60 cells with 5 ng/ml of G-CSF, as compared to the control (Fig. 8A and B). On the other hand, after treatment of HL-60 cells with the same dose of G-CSF, the percentage of S-phase cells was decreased (Fig. 8C). Moreover, after incubation with 10 ng/ml of G-CSF, a significant increase in the percentage of cells in sub-G1 phase was noticed (Fig. 8A). There were no statistically significant differences in the percentage of HL-60 cells in G2/M phase for both doses of G-CSF (Fig. 8D). As far as K562 cell line is concerned, a significant increase in the percentage of cells in sub-G1 phase was observed following treatment with 5 ng/ml of G-CSF (Fig. 9A). Even though the number of cells classified as G0/G1 and G2/M was decreased after treatment with 10 ng/ml of G-CSF, the percentage of cells with DNA content typical of sub-G1 increased, in comparison to the control. These differences were statistically significant (Fig. 9A, B and D). Moreover, the statistically significant differences in the percentage of cells in S phase were not observed (Fig. 9C).
Annexin V and 7-AAD double-staining
The flow cytometric analysis indicated a decrease in the number of early apoptotic cells after treatment of HL-60 cells with both doses of G-CSF (Fig. 10B). At the 5 ng/ml concentration of G-CSF, there was also seen a significant increase in the number of necrotic cells (only 7-AAD positive) (Fig. 10D). However, the statistically significant differences in the percentage of viable and late apoptotic cells were not observed (Fig. 10A and C). In K562 cell line, an increase in the percentage of late apoptotic cells was noted after treatment with both doses of G-CSF (Fig. 11C) but the statistically significant differences in the percentage of viable, early apoptotic and necrotic cells were not observed (Fig. 11A, B and D).
Discussion
In the present study, we showed the changes of F-actin distribution in HL-60 cells after treatment with non-glycosylated G-CSF. Although, K562 cell line has no detectable G-CSF receptors, changes in the organization and fluorescence intensity of F-actin in isolated nuclei were observed. Moreover, the fluorescence microscopic results showed that stimulation of HL-60 cell line with G-CSF caused F-actin reorganization, including the formation of aggregates and short fibers in the cytoplasm and its conglomeration at the cell surface. Similar results were reported by Veselska et al, who observed the same structures of F-actin during the incubation of HL-60 cells with ATRA and PMA (34). We suggest that observed reorganization of filamentous actin is associated with differentiation process and that surface-associated structures may participate in the apoptotic bleb formation. Such an explanation is reasonable because, in our experiment, some HL-60 cell nuclei showed apoptotic features and the significant increase in the percentage of cells in sub-G1 phase after treatment with both doses of G-CSF was shown. Furthermore, the G1 phase arrest is considered to be a marker of cell differentiation, which was confirmed in the present study during treatment of HL-60 cells with 5 ng/ml of G-CSF (35,36). After differentiation, the cells were most probably switched to apoptotic pathway. An accumulation of F-actin in the apoptotic cells in HL-60 cells after treatment with ATRA and doxorubicin was noticed (37,38). It is well known now, that the processes of differentiation and apoptosis are connected with the reorganization of the cytoskeleton, but the mechanism of this linkage still remains unclear (30,34,39–41). Some scientists consider that the differentiation process is associated with actin polymerization whereas others suggest its relation to depolymerization (8,42,43). Moreover, we observed statistically significant increase of F-actin level in HL-60 cell line after exposure to 5 ng/ml of G-CSF. This observation was confirmed by flow cytometry and transmission electron microscopy. Moreover, our previous study also showed the increase of F-actin level in HL-60 cells after treatment with G-CSF (41). Furthermore, the increase of F-actin level in neutrophils was shown by Carulli et al and Gomez-Cambronero et al as a result of G-CSF treatment (8,43). Similarly, Chodniewicz and Zhelev also noted the higher content of actin filaments in granulocytes incubated with GM-CSF (42). However, the opposite results were observed by Kutsuna et al in human neutrophils. They observed a cytokine-induced actin depolymerization (30). We are in agreement with the authors who suggested that F-actin polymerization and depolymerization depends on the cytokine doses and the time of incubation (8,30,42,43).
In the past decade, many studies have been focused on the development of new nanomaterials and their interactions with cells (44). Here, we showed the usefulness of semiconductor CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals in the localization of F-actin at the ultrastructural level. The results presented in this paper are the ultrastructural evidence of phalloidin-based localization of F-actin using transmission electron microscopy. Up to now, the localization of cytoskeletal proteins in TEM was performed by a direct or indirect method using antibodies. However, there was no evidence concerning phalloidin-based localization of actin filaments. Our previous data showed the presence of F-actin in the cell nucleus, that was determined only by using fluorescence techniques, including flow cytometer analysis of isolated nuclei and laser scanning confocal microscopy (45,46). In the present study, we combined pre- and post-embedding methods and that was the key to successful detection of F-actin at the ultrastructural level. Moreover, the use of colloidal gold for phalloidin-based method of F-actin localization, made it impossible to localize actin filaments or showed very weak delectability (data not shown). As regards the results obtained by using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry, we showed changes in F-actin distribution at the ultrastructural level in the area of the cytoplasm and cell nucleus after treatment of HL-60 and K562 cell lines with different G-CSF doses.
In 2010, Xu et al demonstrated the nuclear translocation of β-actin, one of the actin isoform, during the macrophage differentiation of HL-60 cells. It was shown that this actin isoform is translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and plays an important role in the regulation of the transcription process (29). It is known, that actin and actin-binding proteins are involved in chromatin remodeling and gene transcription. In our previous study, we observed that actin was associated with the heterochromatin during apoptosis (38,46,47). Moreover, Zhao et al showed that F-actin is directly involved in the chromatin reorganization (48). Influence of actin on the translocation of transcriptional RNA was presented by Hofmann et al and Widlak et al (24,49). They described the participation of F-actin in the processing of retroviral RNA and transport of protein kinase inhibitor (PKI). Influence of actin on the regulation of RNAP II-mediated transcription was observed by many other researchers (24,29,50). In the present study we observed the increase of F-actin level after treatment of HL-60 cells with 5 ng/ml concentration of G-CSF in cytometric analysis, and a higher labeling of nuclear F-actin under transmission electron microscope was observed. However, different observations were made during the analyses with the use of K562 cell line. Even though these cells do not express the receptor for G-CSF, some changes were seen in the present study in comparison to the control. We observed a statistically significant increase in the percentage of cells in sub-G1 phase following treatment with 5 and 10 ng/ml concentration of G-CSF. There was also an increase in the percentage of late apoptotic cells after treatment with both doses of G-CSF. On the other hand, the statistically significant difference in the cytoplasmic F-actin level was not detected, but its nuclear level was decreased. We believe that a decreased level of F-actin content in the cell nuclei may be due to the reorganization of the chromatin, which can be supported by the increase of the population of cells in the subG1 phase and in the percentage of late apoptotic cells.
It is known that G-CSF has no detectable effect on some of the hematopoietic cell lines such as U-937, WEHI-3B and K562 (33). However, it has been also shown that granulocyte-colony stimulating factors could promote a time- and dose-dependent increase in ROS production. Additionally, Zhu et al suggested that the G-CSF-induced Lyn-PI3KAkt pathway controls ROS production in a myeloid cell line (51). However, Kitagawa et al indicated the G-CSF-enhanced the effect of Ara-C in U937 and WEHI-3B (52). They found that G-CSF mobilized G0/G1-phase cells into the S phase in U937 cells. On the basis of our present studies, we suggest that G-CSF can act by a receptor-independent pathway or through another homologous receptor. As shown by Chow et al the G-CSF receptor reveals 46% homology in sequence to gp130, the IL-6 receptor signal transducer, and has an identical domain structure (53). Moreover, the overall structure of the receptor for G-CSF is similar to the leptin and LIF receptor (54,55).
In summary, we conclude that the G-CSF-based reorganization of actin filaments is involved in the differentiation process in HL-60 cell line. Moreover, its polymerization and depolymerization depends mostly on G-CSF concentration. As far as K562 cell line is concerned, we observed changes at the flow cytometry, fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy level. Although, K562 cell line has no detectable G-CSF receptors, in our studies it was shown that the G-CSF-induced statistically significant effect on the cell cycle, apoptosis and F-actin fluorescence intensity in the cell nuclei. We suppose that these changes are associated with the G-CSF receptor-independent pathway or its binding to other similar receptors. However, in order to find the exact mechanism of its influence on the cells without G-CSF receptors, further investigations are needed. Moreover, we showed here that CdSe/ZnS quantum dots are useful in the localization of subcellular structures at the ultrastructural level and that our phalloidin-based method allows determination of the presence of F-actin in the cell nucleus by transmission electron microscopy.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by research task within the framework of the statutory activities no. 585 (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland).
References
Oppenheim JJ: Cytokines: past, present and future. Int J Hematol. 74:3–8. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Basu S, Dunn A and Ward A: G-CSF: function and modes of action. Int J Mol Med. 10:3–10. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Beekman R and Touw IP: G-CSF and its receptor in myeloid malignancy. Blood. 115:5131–5136. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Franzke A: The role of G-CSF in adaptive immunity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 17:235–244. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Leavey PJ, Sellins KS, Thurman G, et al: In vivo treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor results in divergent effects on neutrophil functions measured in vitro. Blood. 92:4366–4374. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Suzuki S, Kobayashi M, Chiba K, et al: Autocrine production of epithelial cell-derived neutrophil attractant-78 induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in neutrophils. Blood. 99:1863–1865. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bradstock KF: The use of hematopoietic growth factors in the treatment of acute leukemia. Curr Pharm Des. 8:343–355. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carulli G, Mattii L, Azzara A, et al: Actin polymerization in neutrophils from donors of peripheral blood stem cells: divergent effects of glycosylated and nonglycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Am J Hematol. 81:318–323. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Håkansson L, Höglund M, Jönsson UB, Torsteinsdottir I, Xu X and Venge P: Effects of in vivo administration of G-CSF on neutrophil and eosinophil adhesion. Br J Haematol. 98:603–611. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ripa RS and Kastrup J: G-CSF therapy with mobilization of bone marrow stem cells for myocardial recovery after acute myocardial infarction - a relevant treatment? Exp Hematol. 36:681–686. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ku NO, Zhou X, Toivola DM and Omary MB: The cytoskeleton of digestive epithelia in health and disease. Am J Physiol. 277:G1108–G1137. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bursch W, Hochegger K, Torok L, Marian B, Ellinger A and Hermann RS: Autophagic and apoptotic types of programmed cell death exhibit different fates of cytoskeletal filaments. J Cell Sci. 113:1189–1198. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Pollard TD: The cytoskeleton, cellular motility and the reductionist agenda. Nature. 422:741–745. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ndozangue-Touriguine O, Hamelin J and Bréard J: Cytoskeleton and apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol. 76:11–18. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hightower RC and Meagher RB: The molecular evolution of actin. Genetics. 114:315–332. 1986.PubMed/NCBI | |
Akisaka T, Yoshida H, Inoue S and Shimizu K: Organization of cytoskeletal F-actin, G-actin, and gelsolin in the adhesion structures in cultured osteoclast. J Bone Miner Res. 16:1248–1255. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
White S, Williams P, Wojcik KR, Sun S, Hiemstra PS, Rabe KF and Dorscheid DR: Initiation of apoptosis by actin cytoskeletal derangement in human airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 24:282–294. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ascough KR: Endocytosis: Actin in the driving seat. Curr Biol. 14:R124–R126. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carlier MF and Pantaloni D: Control of actin assembly dynamics in cell motility. J Biol Chem. 282:23005–23009. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pederson T and Aebi U: Actin in the nucleus: what form and what for? J Struct Biol. 140:3–9. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Visa N and Percipalle P: Nuclear functions of actin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2:a0006202010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Olave IA, Reck-Peterson SL and Crabtree GR: Nuclear actin and actin-related proteins in chromatin remodeling. Annu Rev Biochem. 71:755–781. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Blessing CA, Ugrinova GT and Goodson HV: Actin and ARPs: action in the nucleus. Trends Cell Biol. 14:435–442. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hofmann WA, Stojiljkovic L, Fuchsova B, et al: Actin is part of pre-initiation complexes and is necessary for transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat Cell Biol. 6:1094–1101. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miralles F and Visa N: Actin in transcription and transcription regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 18:261–266. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen M and Shen X: Nuclear actin and actin-related proteins in chromatin dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 19:326–330. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pederson T: As functional nuclear actin comes into view, is it globular, filamentous, or both? J Cell Biol. 180:1061–1064. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gieni RS and Hendzel MJ: Actin dynamics and functions in the interphase nucleus: moving toward an understanding of nuclear polymeric actin. Biochem Cell Biol. 87:283–306. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu YZ, Thuraisingam T, Morais DA, Rola-Pleszczynski M and Radzioch D: Nuclear translocation of β-actin is involved in transcriptional regulation during macrophage differentiation of HL-60 cells. Mol Biol Cell. 21:811–820. 2010. | |
Kutsuna H, Suzuki K, Kamata N, et al: Actin reorganization and morphological changes in human neutrophils stimulated by TNF, GM-CSF and G-CSF: the role of MAP kinases. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 286:55–64. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
El-Sonbaty SS, Watanabe M, Hochito K, Yamaguchi K, Matsuda I and Tsuchiya H: Exogenously expressed granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptor on K562 cells can transduce G-CSF-triggered growth and differentiation signals. Int J Hematol. 61:61–68. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Saito K, Nakamura Y, Waga K, et al: Mature and immature myeloid cells decrease the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor level by absorption of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Int J Hematol. 67:145–151. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brandstetter T, Ninci E, Bettendorf H, et al: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptor gene expression of ovarian carcinoma does not correlate with G-CSF caused cell proliferation. Cancer. 91:1372–1383. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Veselska R, Zitterbart K, Jelinkova S, Neradil J and Svoboda A: Specific cytoskeleton changes during apoptosis accompanying induced differentiation of HL-60 myeloid leukemia cells. Oncol Rep. 10:1049–1058. 2003. | |
Godyn JJ, Xu H, Zhang F, Kolla S and Studzinski GP: A dual block to cell cycle progression in HL60 cells exposed to analogues of vitamin D3. Cell Prolif. 27:37–46. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Erenpreisa J and Cragg MS: Mitotic death: a mechanism of survival? Cancer Cell Int. 1:12001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zitterbart K and Veselska R: Effect of retinoic acid on the actin cytoskeleton in HL-60 cells. Neoplasma. 48:456–461. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Grzanka A, Grzanka D and Orlikowska M: Cytoskeletal reorganization during process of apoptosis induced by cytostatic drugs in K-562 and HL-60 leukemia cell lines. Biochem Pharmacol. 66:1611–1617. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Atencia R, Garcia-Sanz M, Perez-Yarza G, Asumendi A, Hilario E and Arechaga J: A structural analysis of cytoskeleton components during the execution chase of apoptosis. Protoplasma. 198:163–169. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Brown SB, Bailey K and Savill J: Actin is cleaved during constitutive apoptosis. Biochem J. 323:233–237. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Grzanka A, Izdebska M, Litwiniec A, Grzanka D and Safiejko-Mroczka B: Actin filament reorganization in HL-60 leukemia cell line after treatment with G-CSF and GM-CSF. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 45:191–197. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chodniewicz D and Zhelev DV: Novel pathway of F-actin polymerization in the human neutrophil. Blood. 102:2251–2258. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gomez-Cambronero J, Horn J, Paul CC and Baumann MA: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor is a chemoattractant cytokine for human neutrophils: involvement of the ribosomal p70 S6 kinase signaling pathway. J Immunol. 171:6846–6855. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mailänder V and Landfester K: Interaction of nanoparticles with cells. Biomacromolecules. 10:2379–2400. 2009. | |
Izdebska M, Grzanka D, Gackowska L, Żuryń A and Grzanka A: The influence of Trisenox on action organization in HL-60 cells. Cent Eur J Biol. 4:351–361. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Grzanka D, Marszałek A, Gagat M, Izdebska M, Gackowska L and Grzanka A: Doxorubicin-induced F-actin reorganization in cofilin-1 (nonmuscle) down-regulated CHO AA8 cells. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 48:377–386. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Izdebska M, Grzanka A, Ostrowski M, Żuryń A and Grzanka D: Effect of arsenic trioxide (Trisenox) on actin organization in K-562 erythroleukemia cells. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 47:453–459. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao K, Wang W, Rando OJ, Xue Y, Swiderek K, Kuo A and Crabtree GR: Rapid and phosphoinositol-dependent binding of the SWI/SNF-like BAF complex to chromatin after T lymphocyte receptor signaling. Cell. 95:625–636. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Widlak P, Palyvoda O, Kumala S and Garrard WT: Modeling apoptotic chromatin condensation in normal cell nuclei. Requirement for intranuclear mobility and actin involvement. J Biol Chem. 277:21683–21690. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sjolinder M, Bjork P, Soderberg E, Sabri N, Farrants AK and Visa N: The growing pre-mRNA recruits actin and chromatin-modifying factors to transcriptionally active genes. Genes Dev. 19:1871–1884. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu QS, Xia L, Mills GB, Lowell CA, Touw IP and Corey SJ: G-CSF induced reactive oxygen species involves Lyn-PI3-kinase-Akt and contributes to myeloid cell growth. Blood. 107:1847–1856. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kitagawa J, Hara T, Tsurumi H, Kanemura N, Kasahara S, Shimizu M and Moriwaki H: Cell cycle-dependent priming action of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) enhances in vitro apoptosis induction by cytarabine and etoposide in leukemia cell lines. J Clin Exp Hematop. 50:99–105. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chow DC, Brevnova L, He XL, Martick MM, Bankovich A and Garcia KC: A structural template for gp130-cytokine signaling assemblies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1592:225–235. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gearing DP, Thut CJ, VandeBos T, et al: Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor is structurally related to the IL-6 signal transducer, gp130. EMBO J. 10:2839–2848. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tartaglia LA, Dembski M, Weng X, et al: Identification and expression cloning of a leptin receptor, OB-R. Cell. 83:1263–1271. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |