MCM7 serves as a prognostic marker in diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinoma and siRNA-mediated knockdown suppresses its oncogenic function
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 19, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3094
- Pages: 2071-2078
Abstract
Introduction
Gastric cancer consists of primary malignant lesions in any part of the stomach and causes ~870,000 deaths worldwide per year (1). The highest incidences are in eastern Asia (China, Japan, Korea), South America and Eastern Europe (2). Most stomach cancer is caused by H. pylori infection (3). The mechanism by which H. pylori induces stomach cancer potentially involves chronic inflammation or the action virulence factors such as CagA (4). Dietary factors including some foods with high sodium such as smoked foods, salted fish and pickled vegetables are associated with higher risk (5). Smoking increases the risk of developing gastric cancer significantly (6). Other factors associated with increased risk are autoimmune atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and genetic factors (7). Gastric cancers are overwhelmingly adenocarcinoma (8) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is a malignant epithelial tumor which originates from glandular epithelium of the gastric mucosa. According to Lauren classification, it is divided as two major types, intestinal-type and diffuse-type.
MCM7 is one of the highly conserved mini-chromosome maintenance proteins (9) that are essential for the initiation of genomic replication. The hexametric protein complex formed by the MCM proteins is a key component of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) and involved in the formation of replication forks and in the recruitment of other DNA replication related proteins (10,11). Some studies have suggested that MCM4, 6 and 7 complexes contain DNA helicase activity (12,13) and act as a DNA unwinding enzyme. MCM7 amplification and overexpression in several human malignancies has been identified (14–16), and its function in cancer development is gradually revealed.
However, in GAC, MCM7 has not been functionally investigated and evaluated on its clinical significance. In the present study, we provide the first evidence that MCM7 overexpression is correlated with diffuse-type GAC patient survival and siRNA mediated downregulation of MCM7 in gastric cancer cell lines has anti-oncogenic effect.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and primary GAC samples
The 9 GAC cell lines (MKN28, KATOIII, MKN45, SNU16, SNU1, MKN7, MKN1, NCI-N87 and AGS) (17), were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; EU Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin and 10 μg/ml streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. Archival tissue blocks from 123 patients with diffuse-type GAC were retrieved from the Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital (PWH), Hong Kong. Frozen tissues from another 6 pairs of primary GACs and corresponding non-tumorous gastric mucosa were collected from patients who underwent gastectomy before any therapeutic intervention. The AJCC (7th edition) was used for cancer staging.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Qiagen). High-Capacity cDNA reverse transcription kits (Applied Biosystems) were applied to achieve cDNAs. For qRT-PCR, SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was applied for MCM7 expression (sense, ACTT GTGGAATGGCAGGAAG and antisense, CTAGGCATCC CACTCAAAGG). The normal gastric mRNA was from Ambion (AM 7996). The relative expression level was normalized by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicate reaction wells including positive and negative controls.
Immunohistochemical staining and scoring
Immunohistochemical staining of MCM7 was performed in 4 μm-thick sections. After de-waxing in xylene, sections were rehydrated, rinsed in distilled water, and incubated in 3% H2O2 solution for 25 min to block endogenous peroxidase activities. Antigen retrieval was done by using pressure cooker with 10 nM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for a total of 30 min (high power 10 min followed by low power 20 min). The primary antibody MCM7 (1:1,000, CDC47 Ab-2; NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA, USA) was applied at 4°C overnight and chromogen development was performed using the standard avidin-biotin method (Dako). The nuclear expression of MCM7 was scored by estimating proportion of tumor cells with positive nuclear staining into 4 different groups (negative, none; weak, ≤10%; moderate, 10 to ≤25%; strong, >25%).
Western blot analysis
Protein was extracted from the GAC cell lines, normal gastric epithelium tissues together with 6 paired primary samples using RIPA lysis buffer with proteinase inhibitor. Protein mixed (20 μg) with 5X SDS loading buffer was loaded per lane, separated by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. MCM7 protein was detected with MCM7 antibody (1:50, CDC47 Ab-2; NeoMarkers). Cleaved-PARP (Asp214) (1:1,000, #9541; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) was also evaluated to check late apoptosis.
In vitro functional study assays
Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen) and siMCM7 (SI05064276 and SI05064283; Qiagen) at the concentration of 25 nM. Scramble siRNA was included as control. Cell proliferation was assessed using CellTiter 96® Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (MTT) (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance at 570 nm was measured and documented for the 5-day MTT proliferation analysis (Victor3; Perken-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Monolayer colony formation assay was performed as described in our previous report (18). We used 6-well plates for this assay, 3 for siMCM7 and 3 for siScramble. The time-point was 8 days after transfection. Colonies were fixed with 70% ethanol for 15 min and stained with 2% crystal violet. Colonies with cell number of >50 cells/colony were counted. Cell invasion assay was performed in a 24-well invasion chamber (BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber; BD Biosciences). Cells were harvested from the culture dishes 24 h after transfection, washed three times with culture medium containing 1% FBS, and resuspended in medium with 1% FBS. Then, 300 μl of the cell suspension (1×105 cells) was added into the Transwells, with 500 μl of culture medium containing 10% FBS in the lower chamber. After 24-h incubation at 37°C, cells that invaded through the Matrigel membrane were fixed with 100% methanol for 2 min and stained with 1% Toluidine blue for another 2 min. Cells on the underside of the membrane were counted from 3 microscope fields and the average number recorded.
Statistical analysis
In the functional assays like MTT proliferation, monolayer colony formation and cell invasion, Student’s t-test was used to compare the phenotype difference of siMCM7 knockdown cells and siScramble transfected cells. Correlations between MCM7 expression with other clinicopathologic parameters were evaluated by non-parametric Spearman’s rho rank test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rates according to MCM7 nuclear staining. For the parameters statistically significant in the univariate survival analysis (P<0.05), the multivariate survival was achieved by the Cox regression analysis. All statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software (version 16.0; SPSS Inc.). A two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.
Results
Upregulation of MCM7 in gastric cell lines and primary gastric tumors
The MCM7 mRNA expression levels were higher in 6 GAC cell lines (KatoIII, MKN45, SNU16, MKN1, NCI-N87 and AGS) than it in the normal gastric tissue as shown in Fig. 1A. The upregulation of MCM7 in the GAC cells was further confirmed by western blot analysis. High MCM7 protein expression was observed in all GAC cell lines compared with the 3 normal gastric mucosal samples from patients who underwent weight reduction gastrectomy (Fig. 1B). Comparing tumor with the paired non-tumorous mucosa, upregulation of MCM7 protein was observed in all 6 tumor samples by western blot analysis (Fig. 1C). In normal gastric epithelium tissues, only cells from neck region (proliferation compartment) showed MCM7 nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 1D). Immunohistochemical analysis of 5 paired primary GAC samples showed positive nuclear staining of MCM7 in the tumor tissues but not in the non-tumorous gastric glandular epithelium (Fig. 1E).
MCM7 knockdown in GAC cells exerts anti-oncogenic effect in vitro
Upregulation of MCM7 in GACs suggested a potential tumorigenic role of MCM7 in cancer development. To further elucidate the functional role it plays, we investigated the effect of MCM7 knockdown by siRNA in vitro. MCM7 were knocked down by 2 specific siMCM7s in AGS and NCI-N87 with high transfection efficiency (Fig. 2A). The 5-day MTT assay indicated that the MCM7 knockdown reduced cell proliferation rates to significant levels (AGS, 32.1 and 30.0%; NCI-N87, 40.5 and 43.6%; P<0.001) (Fig. 2B) compared with siScramble control groups. The viability change induced by siMCM7 was also confirmed by anchorage-dependent monolayer colony formation assays. A significant reduction of colony number and colony size was observed in cells transfected with siMCM7 compared with the siScramble group (reduced to 21.3 and 10.6% in AGS; 7.6 and 9.2% in NCI-N87; P<0.001) (Fig. 2C). In cell motility assays using BD BioCoat chamber, we confirmed that the invaded cell number was significantly lower in the siMCM7 transfected cells than the control groups (impaired to 23.0 and 19.1% in AGS; 34.9 and 47.6% in NCI-N87; P<0.001) (Fig. 2D), suggesting that MCM7 was involved in the invasion of cancer cells. Moreover, siMCM7 induced late apoptosis in AGS and NCI-N87 cells which was represented by activation of cleaved-PARP (Fig. 2A).
MCM7 overexpression correlates with poor survival in diffuse-type primary GACs
In total 267 GAC samples, MCM7 expression had no correlation with survival (P=0.724), thus, we checked its prognostic correlation according to histological type (intestinal and diffuse) and stage (early and advanced) separately. We found only in the diffuse-type GAC, MCM7 correlates with poor survival.
MCM7 was predominantly expressed in the nuclei of diffuse-type tumor cells (Fig. 3A). Of the 123 diffuse-type GAC samples, 16 cases (13.0%) had MCM7 negative nuclear staining, 11 cases (8.9%) had weak staining, 44 cases (35.8%) had moderate staining and 52 cases (42.3%) had strong staining. No significant survival difference was observed between the 4-grade MCM7 expression by univariate analysis (P=0.071; Fig. 3B). Then, we stratified negative and weak staining cases as negative/weak MCM7 expression group (27/123, 22.0%), and moderate and strong cases as moderate/strong MCM7 expression group (96/123, 78.0%). MCM7 nuclear expression correlates with poor survival based on these groupings (P=0.048; Fig. 3C).
We further investigated the clinicopathological correlation of MCM7 in diffuse-type GACs. Table I summarizes the correlation of MCM7 with clinicopathological parameters in diffuse-type GAC patients. MCM7 expression only correlated with advanced age (>60 years; P=0.015). Univariate analysis (Table II) indicated that MCM7 expression in diffuse-type GACs associated with poor disease-specific survival (P=0.048). Advanced age and stage were (T, N and M, respectively) also correlated with poor survival (P<0.05). By multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (Table II), only stage (T, N and M, respectively) was independently associated with disease-specific survival (P<0.05).
Table IIUnivariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of clinicopathological factors in patients with GAC. |
Discussion
In gastric cancer, MCM7 was first screened from mRNA expression microarray (Fig. 4A) and array-CGH (comparative genomic hybridization, Fig. 4B) in 9 GAC cell lines. The MCM7 mRNA expression showed positive correlation with DNA copy number change (Fig. 4C), indicating MCM7 DNA copy number gain was partly responsible for its mRNA upregulation in GAC, and van Dekken et al (19) screened MCM7 using the same method in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas due to the DNA amplification and mRNA upregulation. MCM7 gene on chromosome 7q22 contains an intronic miRNA miR-106b-25 cluster in intron 13 (20). MCM7 oncogenicity may be linked, at least in part, to overexpression of the hosted miRNAs which targets TGF-β tumor suppressor pathway in gastric cancer (21).
MCM7 has been reported to be upregulated in many types of cancer and functions as oncogene in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (22), non-small cell lung cancer (23,24), Hodgkin lymphoma (25), prostate cancer (15), liver cancer (26), meningiomas (27), colorectal cancer (28,29), medulloblastoma (30) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (31). By siRNA-mediated knockdown of MCM7 in GAC cell lines, the cell proliferation and invasion were inhibited, thus MCM7 knockdown exerts anti-oncogenic effect in vitro. This result was concordant with functional studies in other types of cancer. In medulloblastoma, exogenous overexpression of MCM7 increased tumor growth and invasiveness, whereas MCM7 knockdown by RNA interference inhibited cell growth and reduced cell migration and invasion (30). MCM7 elimination in prostate cancer and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines also suppressed cell growth. In a mouse model of PC3 and DU145 xenografts of prostate cancer, knockdown of MCM7 dramatically reduced the tumor volumes, decreased tumor metastasis and animal mortality (32).
Some reports indicated that MCM7 was a more reliable and useful biomarker in assessing tumor proliferation, aggression and in the prognosis of patients even than the existing markers such as Ki-67 (33,34). In primary diffuse-type GACs, we identified that MCM7 was moderately/strongly stained in 96 of 123 GAC (78.0%) and its overexpression was closely correlated with advanced age (>60 years). However, MCM7 expression was not detected associated with other clinicopathological factors including clinical grade, stage and lymph node metastasis. In endometrial carcinoma (35) and Hodgkin lymphoma (25), MCM7 overexpression also correlates with advanced age. More importantly, its upregulation correlates with poor survival and predicts poor prognosis, indicating MCM7 might have potential as a biomarker and therapeutic target in diffuse-type GAC.
In conclusion, the present findings indicate that MCM7 expression may be a useful prognosis indicator in patients with diffuse-type GACs and its knockdown by RNA interference quenches its oncogenic property in gastric cancer.
Acknowledgements
The present study is supported by a National Natural Science Grant of China (81201591).
References
Kelley JR and Duggan JM: Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 56:1–9. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith MG, Hold GL, Tahara E and El-Omar EM: Cellular and molecular aspects of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 12:2979–2990. 2006. | |
Shiota S, Suzuki R and Yamaoka Y: The significance of virulence factors in Helicobacter pylori. J Dig Dis. 14:341–349. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sepulveda AR: Helicobacter, inflammation, and gastric cancer. Curr Pathobiol Rep. 1:9–18. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhong C, Li KN, Bi JW and Wang BC: Sodium intake, salt taste and gastric cancer risk according to Helicobacter pylori infection, smoking, histological type and tumor site in China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13:2481–2484. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang MW, Jin MJ, Yu YX, et al: Associations of lifestyle-related factors, hsa-miR-149 and hsa-miR-605 gene polymorphisms with gastrointestinal cancer risk. Mol Carcinog. 51(Suppl 1): E21–E31. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gomceli I, Demiriz B and Tez M: Gastric carcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 18:5164–5170. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Green D, Ponce de Leon S, Leon-Rodriguez E and Sosa-Sanchez R: Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with survival. Am J Clin Oncol. 25:84–89. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kebebew E, Peng M, Reiff E, Duh QY, Clark OH and McMillan A: Diagnostic and prognostic value of cell-cycle regulatory genes in malignant thyroid neoplasms. World J Surg. 30:767–774. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Luo JH: Oncogenic activity of MCM7 transforming cluster. World J Clin Oncol. 2:120–124. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei Q, Li J, Liu T, Tong X and Ye X: Phosphorylation of minichromosome maintenance protein 7 (MCM7) by cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase affects its function in cell cycle regulation. J Biol Chem. 288:19715–19725. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishimi Y: A DNA helicase activity is associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 protein complex. J Biol Chem. 272:24508–24513. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
You Z, Komamura Y and Ishimi Y: Biochemical analysis of the intrinsic Mcm4-Mcm6-mcm7 DNA helicase activity. Mol Cell Biol. 19:8003–8015. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Honeycutt KA, Chen Z, Koster MI, et al: Deregulated minichromosomal maintenance protein MCM7 contributes to oncogene driven tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 25:4027–4032. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ren B, Yu G, Tseng GC, et al: MCM7 amplification and overexpression are associated with prostate cancer progression. Oncogene. 25:1090–1098. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kan T, Sato F, Ito T, et al: The miR-106b-25 polycistron, activated by genomic amplification, functions as an oncogene by suppressing p21 and Bim. Gastroenterology. 136:1689–1700. 2009. | |
Kang W, Tong JH, Chan AW, et al: Stathmin1 plays oncogenic role and is a target of microRNA-223 in gastric cancer. PLoS One. 7:e339192012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang W, Tong JH, Chan AW, et al: Yes-associated protein 1 exhibits oncogenic property in gastric cancer and its nuclear accumulation associates with poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 17:2130–2139. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van Dekken H, Tilanus HW, Hop WC, et al: Array comparative genomic hybridization, expression array, and protein analysis of critical regions on chromosome arms 1q, 7q, and 8p in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 189:37–42. 2009. | |
Ambs S, Prueitt RL, Yi M, et al: Genomic profiling of microRNA and messenger RNA reveals deregulated microRNA expression in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 68:6162–6170. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Petrocca F, Visone R, Onelli MR, et al: E2F1-regulated microRNAs impair TGFβ-dependent cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in gastric cancer. Cancer Cell. 13:272–286. 2008. | |
Fristrup N, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Reinert T, et al: Multicenter validation of cyclin D1, MCM7, TRIM29, and UBE2C as prognostic protein markers in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Am J Pathol. 182:339–349. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu YZ, Jiang YY, Hao JJ, et al: Prognostic significance of MCM7 expression in the bronchial brushings of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer. 77:176–182. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Toyokawa G, Masuda K, Daigo Y, et al: Minichromosome Maintenance Protein 7 is a potential therapeutic target in human cancer and a novel prognostic marker of non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 10:652011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marnerides A, Vassilakopoulos TP, Boltetsou E, et al: Immunohistochemical expression and prognostic significance of CCND3, MCM2 and MCM7 in Hodgkin lymhoma. Anticancer Res. 31:3585–3594. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou YM, Zhang XF, Cao L, et al: MCM7 expression predicts post-operative prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 32:1505–1509. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Saydam O, Senol O, Schaaij-Visser TB, et al: Comparative protein profiling reveals minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins as novel potential tumor markers for meningiomas. J Proteome Res. 9:485–494. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pillaire MJ, Selves J, Gordien K, et al: A ‘DNA replication’ signature of progression and negative outcome in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 29:876–887. 2010. | |
Nishihara K, Shomori K, Fujioka S, et al: Minichromosome maintenance protein 7 in colorectal cancer: implication of prognostic significance. Int J Oncol. 33:245–251. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lau KM, Chan QK, Pang JC, et al: Minichromosome maintenance proteins 2, 3 and 7 in medulloblastoma: overexpression and involvement in regulation of cell migration and invasion. Oncogene. 29:5475–5489. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng CJ, Li HJ, Li JN, Lu YJ and Liao GQ: Expression of Mcm7 and Cdc6 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions. Anticancer Res. 28:3763–3769. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi YK, Yu YP, Tseng GC and Luo JH: Inhibition of prostate cancer growth and metastasis using small interference RNA specific for minichromosome complex maintenance component 7. Cancer Gene Ther. 17:694–699. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fujioka S, Shomori K, Nishihara K, et al: Expression of minichromosome maintenance 7 (MCM7) in small lung adenocarcinomas (pT1): Prognostic implication. Lung Cancer. 65:223–229. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishino H, Hara Y, Takekoshi S, et al: Ki-67 and minichromosome maintenance-7 (MCM7) expression in canine pituitary corticotroph adenomas. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 41:207–213. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li SS, Xue WC, Khoo US, et al: Replicative MCM7 protein as a proliferation marker in endometrial carcinoma: a tissue microarray and clinicopathological analysis. Histopathology. 46:307–313. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |