Dual effects of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 xenografts and colorectal adenocarcinoma HT-29 xenografts in mice

  • Authors:
    • Jung Joo Rhyu
    • Jun-Won Yun
    • Euna Kwon
    • Jeong-Hwan Che
    • Byeong-Cheol Kang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 7, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4185
  • Pages: 1733-1744
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hATMSCs) have great potential as a therapy for various diseases. However, emerging evidence shows that there are conflicting results concerning effects of hATMSCs on tumor progression. Our objective was to determine whether and how hATMSCs modulate tumor growth. After cancer cell lines were subcutaneously inoculated into BALB/c-nude and hairless severe combined immunodeficient mice, hATMSCs were intratumorally injected into the mice. The growth of the A549 tumors was inhibited by hATMSCs, yet that of the HT-29 tumors was significantly promoted by hATMSCs in the in vivo xenograft models. In vitro study using a co-culture system of cancer cells and hATMSCs was consistent with the in vivo experiments. To reveal the molecular events induced by hATMSCs in the xenograft models, global gene expression profiles of the A549 and HT-29 tumors in the absence or presence of hATMSCs were determined. Significant numbers of genes involved in biological processes were altered in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors, whereas no biological process was regulated by treatment with hATMSCs in the HT-29 tumors, reflecting the different effects of hATMSCs in the different types of cancer. Notably, histone cluster 1, H2aj and neuropeptide Y receptor Y4 were found to be expressed in direct or inverse proportion to tumor size in both xenograft models. In addition, nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) p65 was differentially phosphorylated by the hATMSCs dependent on the source of the cancer cells. In conclusion, the identified gene profiling and NF-κB signaling provide molecular evidence to explain the conflicting findings in tumor‑MSC studies, although further study is needed to confirm these findings using various types of cancer.

Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are defined as cells possessing the ability of self-renewal, proliferation and differentiation into multiple lineages, including chondrocytes, osteoblasts and adipocytes (1). MSCs are known to have homing properties and can repair injured tissues; thus, MSCs demonstrate potential as therapy for organ defects, regeneration or certain other conditions, including bone defects (2,3), hair loss (4), liver fibrosis (5), pancreatic islet transplantation, immunomodulation (6) and neuronal regeneration (7). MSCs can be found in various tissues, including bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, placenta and fat (8). Among these sites, adipose tissue is accessible and abundant for the isolation of adult stem cells. Therefore, human adipose tissue-derived MSCs (hATMSCs) obtained by relatively less invasive procedures are an attractive source for cell therapy.

Our previous study indicated that systemic transplantation of hATMSCs did not induce tumor development (9). MacIsaac et al (10) also showed that no malignancies were detected in normal mice treated with hATMSCs. However, in tumor models, MSCs have been reported to play a role in the process of carcinogenesis, tumor growth and metastasis, although numerous studies have reported contradicting results; some investigators found that MSCs promote tumor growth and others report that MSCs inhibit tumor growth (11). Maestroni et al (12) reported that mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) inhibited the proliferation and growth of Lewis lung carcinoma and B16 melanoma. It was also reported that hBM-MSCs showed a tumor-suppressive effect in an experimental model of Kaposi's sarcoma (13). BM-MSCs also exhibited an inhibitory effect on A549 tumor cells both in vivo and in vitro experiments (14). In contrast, a promoting effect of MSCs on tumor growth was observed in other studies. Zhu et al (15) subcutaneously injected hBM-MSCs along with colon cancer cells, and promotion of angiogenesis and tumor growth were noted. Xu et al (16) showed that hBM-MSCs promoted the growth and metastasis of osteosarcoma. The tumor-promoting effect of BM-MSCs was also demonstrated by Tsai et al (17) in HT-29 cancer cells.

Some mechanisms of MSC-related tumor supporting effects have been reported, which include vascular (18) and tumor stromal support (19), immunosuppressive effects (20) and metastatic support (21). On the other hand, the tumor inhibitory mechanisms of MSCs could be due to cell cycle arrest (22), angiogenesis inhibition (23) and regulation of certain soluble factors, such as Wnt inhibitor, Dickkopf-related protein-1 (DKK-1), that may block tumor-related cell signaling pathways (24). Despite these explanations regarding the action of MSCs, the tumor modulation mechanisms of MSCs are extremely complicated and difficult to demonstrate. Thus, in order for the clinical use of MSCs as a novel cell therapy for various conditions, it is critical to understand the interactions between tumors and MSCs. In the present study, we investigated the tumor-modulatory effects of hATMSCs in several types of human cancer cells to clarify the roles of hATMSCs on human cancers and to determine the underlying mechanisms.

Materials and methods

Tumor cell lines

Human malignant melanoma cell line A-375, human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 and human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line HT-29 were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Human epidermoid carcinoma cell line A-431, human gastric carcinoma cell line NCI-N87 and human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line Capan-1 were obtained from the Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). The cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.03% antibiotic-antimycotic (all from Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified chamber.

Isolation and characterization of hATMSCs

hATMSCs were prepared from surplus banked stem cells under good manufacturing practice conditions (RNL Bio, Seoul, Korea) and used as anonymized materials. In brief, human abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue was obtained by simple liposuction following informed consent from donors, digested with collagenase I (1 mg/ml), and filtered through a 100-μm nylon sieve to remove cellular debris and centrifuged at 470 g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in RCME cell attachment medium (RNL Bio) containing 10% FBS and cultured at 37°C. After 24 h, the cell medium was changed to RKCM cell growth medium (RNL Bio) containing 5% FBS. When the cells reached 80–90% confluency, they were subcultured and expanded in RKCM medium until passage 3. The immunophenotypes of the hATMSCs were analyzed using flow cytometric analysis. Trypsinized hATMSCs were suspended [1×106 hATMSCs/25 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] and stained with FITC-conjugated CD31, CD34 and CD45 antibodies and PE-conjugated CD73 and CD90 antibodies (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA).

In vivo tumor xenograft models

Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) and nude mice can be used as human tumor xenograft models (25). Six-week old female BALB/c-nude mice (Orient Bio Inc., Seongnam, Korea) and hairless SCID mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA, USA) were housed in an environmentally controlled room (22±2°C, 40–60% humidity and a 12-h light cycle). The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Biomedical Research Institute at Seoul National University Hospital. Cancer cells (5×106) were subcutaneously inoculated into the back of mice. The injection was made through the subcutaneous layer of the cervicodorsal part of the animals. When the tumor volume reached close to 100 mm3, the mice were intratumorally injected with 1×105 hATMSCs suspended in PBS or PBS once a week for 8 weeks (n=3–6/group). The tumor size was measured twice a week using a caliper (Mitutoyo, Tokyo, Japan), and the tumor volumes were calculated as π/6 × (volume × width × height) according to a previously described method (26). After sacrifice at 8 weeks, the tumor masses were removed, weighed and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formaldehyde solution for histological analysis or preserved at −70°C.

In vitro co-culture and trypan blue exclusion assay

A549 and HT-29 cancer cells (1×105) were co-cultured with hATMSCs in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS in 6-well plates for 72 h. Indirect co-culture was conducted using Transwell inserts (0.4-μm pore size, polycarbonate membrane; SPL, Pocheon, Korea) in 6-well plates to prevent cell-to-cell contact. All of the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Total cell number was assessed by a trypan blue exclusion assay using a hemocytometer under a microscope.

Western blot analysis

The proteins were extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) containing 0.1% phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and protease inhibitor (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The protein concentrations were determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Protein samples were loaded for immunoblotting using antibodies against phosphorylated nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) p65, β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), p-JAK3, p-STAT3 and β-catenin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Densitometry of the target bands was analyzed using ImageJ [National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)].

RNA isolation and microarray analysis

Total RNA from the tumors was isolated using Ambion mirVana miRNA Isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). RNA quality was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using the RNA 6000 Nano Chip (Agilent Technologies, Amstelveen, The Netherlands), and the quantity was determined by the ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Affymetrix GeneChip® Human Gene 2.0 ST Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to analyze differential gene expression profiles as previously described (27). In order to determine whether genes were differentially expressed among the groups, the genes that showed >1.5-fold difference between the average signal values of the control and test groups were selected. Additionally, genes with a p-value <0.05 were extracted by Student's t-test (two-tailed, unpaired). After significant genes were identified, the web-based tool Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) was used to perform the biological interpretation of the differentially expressed genes. The genes were classified based on the information of gene function in Gene Ontology (GO) (http://david.abc.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp).

Flow cytometric analysis

Cancer cells were analyzed by a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur; Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) to assess levels of proliferation, apoptosis and NF-κB expression. Apoptosis and proliferation were evaluated using Annexin V-FITC Early Apoptosis Detection kit (Cell Signaling Technology) and BrdU Flow kit (BD Pharmingen), respectively, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Harvested tumor cells were centrifuged, resuspended in PBS and fixed in 2–4% formaldehyde. Phospho-NF-κB p65-Alexa Fluor 647 conjugate (Cell Signaling Technology) antibody was used for NF-κB analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the results was performed using one-way ANOVA (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p-values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant results. If the variance was significant, the data were analyzed by the multiple comparison procedure of Dunnett's test.

Results

Effects of the hATMSCs on the growth of various types of tumors in vivo xenograft models

For immunophenotypic characterization of the hATMSCs, surface marker expression was examined by flow cytometry. The hATMSCs expressed high levels of MSC markers CD73 and CD90, whereas the hATMSCs were negative for cell adhesion molecule marker CD31 and hematopoietic stem cell markers CD34 and CD45 (Fig. 1A).

In Korea, the stomach, colon and lung have been reported to be the five leading primary sites of cancer both in males and females in 2013 (28). In addition to xenograft models for these cancers, three well-known xenografts, A-375 melanoma, skin squamous cell carcinoma A-431 and Capan-1 pancreatic xenografts (2931), were used in order to investigate the dual effects of the hATMSCs on tumor growth. The tumor size was measured for 8 weeks after the first subcutaneous hATMSC injection in the BALB/c-nude mice subcutaneously inoculated with the cancer cells. The rates of growth of the A431, Capan-1 and A549 tumors were reduced in the hATMSC-injected groups compared with the respective control groups, although the differences did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 1B). In contrast, NCI-N87 and A375 tumors showed the tendency toward increased volume in the hATMSC-injected groups in comparison to the respective control groups. Particularly, the tumor weight of the HT-29 tumors in the hATMSC group was significantly greater than that in the control group. The differences in tumor weights between the hATMSC and the respective control groups showed consistent patterns with the changes in tumor volume (Fig. 1C and D).

Based on the changes in mean volumes and weights by the hATMSC injection in the BALB/c-nude mice, we selected the A549 and the HT-29 tumors for additional in vivo experiments using hairless SCID mice, and confirmed similar dual effects of the hATMSCs in these two types of tumors. The volume and weight of the A549 tumors were significantly reduced in the hATMSC group compared with the parameters in the control group, whereas the tumor volume and weight of the hATMSC-treated HT-29 tumors were significantly greater than the control group (Fig. 2).

Co-culture effect of the hATMSCs on the viability of cancer cell lines A549 and HT-29 in vitro

Tian et al (8) reported opposite effects of MSCs in vivo and in vitro; human BM-MSCs exerted a tumor inhibitory effect in vitro, yet surprisingly had a promoting effect on tumor growth in vivo. To confirm the effects of the hATMSCs on tumor growth in vivo, the A549 and HT-29 cells were co-cultured with the hATMSCs at different ratios of 10:0.5, 10:1 and 10:2 (Fig. 3A). The direct co-culture of the A549 cells with the hATMSCs at the ratios of 10:1 and 10:2 attenuated the proliferation rates of the cells by 9.78 and 19.82%, respectively, compared to the control group (10:0), whereas the direct co-culture of the HT-29 cells with the hATMSCs at the ratios of 10:1 and 10:2 increased the proliferation rates of the cells by 17.22 and 29.78%, respectively, compared to the control group (10:0). This probably resulted from the proliferation rates of the cancer cells changed by the hATMSCs. However, further evidence that excluded the confounding effects associated with changes in the proliferation rates of the hATMSCs by the cancer cells was needed. Thus, indirect co-culture of the cancer cells with the hATMSCs using cell inserts was conducted in order to prevent cell-to-cell contact. The same trends were observed in the indirect co-culture. The proliferation rates of the A549 cells were reduced by 9.72 and 18.57%, respectively, whereas those of the HT-29 cells were increased by 19.90 and 25.79%, respectively, compared to the control group (10:0).

Co-culture effect of the hATMSCs on the proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells

The proliferation of the cancer cells indirectly co-cultured with the hATMSCs was measured by BrdU staining and flow cytometry. The percentage of BrdU-positive A549 cells was reduced by the hATMSC co-culture by 34 and 23% at the ratios of 10:1 and 10:2, respectively, whereas there was a significant induction of the percentage of BrdU-positive HT-29 cells co-cultured with the hATMSCs at the ratios of 10:2 (Fig. 3B). The apoptotic rates of the cancer cells co-cultured with the hATMSCs were analyzed by Annexin V/PI double staining and flow cytometry. While the percentage of live A549 cells was significantly diminished by co-culture with the hATMSCs, the percentage of apoptotic A549 cells was elevated by 40, 85 and 95% at the ratios of 10:0.5, 10:1 and 10:2, respectively (Fig. 3C). However, the hATMSCs had opposite effects on the HT-29 cells; there was an increase in live HT-29 cells and a decrease in apoptotic HT-29 cells of 23 and 26% at the ratios of 10:1 and 10:2, respectively. Collectively, the hATMSCs inhibited the proliferation, yet elevated the apoptosis in the A549 cancer cells, whereas it promoted the proliferation and reduced apoptosis in the HT-29 cancer cells.

Global differences in gene expression in the xenograft tumors in the presence or absence of the hATMSCs

In the microarray experiment with the A549 tumors of the hairless SCID mice, 4,022 probe sets were used to identify significant differences between the hATMSC and the control group in regards to expression levels of genes (fold-change >1.5) (Fig. 4A and B). Particularly, we found that the expression levels of 1,725 probes were increased and those of 2,297 probes were decreased in the hATMSC group. In contrast, in the microarray experiment with the HT-29 tumors of the hairless SCID mice, 164 probes were found expressed more highly in the hATMSC group, whereas 135 probes were found to be more lowly expressed in the hATMSC group. Based on more stringent statistical criteria (fold-change >1.5 and p<0.05), 568 genes were expressed at a higher level and 1,191 genes were expressed at a lower level in the hATMSC group compared with the control group in the A549 tumors (Table I). In contrast, 9 genes were expressed at a higher level and 14 genes were expressed at a lower level in the hATMSC group when compared with the control group in the HT-29 tumors (Table II).

Table I

Top 30 genes showing differential expression in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors ranked by fold-change.

Table I

Top 30 genes showing differential expression in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors ranked by fold-change.

Probe setGeneGene descriptionFold-changea
Genes expressed at a higher level in A549 tumors after hATMSC injection (p<0.05, fold-change >1.5)
 16863393IGFL2IGF-like family member 23.68
 16976821PPBPPro-platelet basic protein [chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 7]3.18
 17061759NRCAMNeuronal cell adhesion molecule2.77
 16852322MAPK4Mitogen-activated protein kinase 42.47
 16873513 LOC400706Uncharacterized LOC4007062.46
 17083433IL33Interleukin 332.45
 16745990miR3167MicroRNA 31672.17
 16909319DNERΔ/notch-like EGF repeat containing2.07
 17022996ROS1c-ros oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase1.97
 16713760 HNRNPA1P33Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 pseudogene 331.97
 16733325 KIRREL3-AS2KIRREL3 antisense RNA 21.87
 16704464NPY4RNeuropeptide Y receptor Y41.86
 16742086PGM2L1Phosphoglucomutase 2-like 11.85
 16710126HTRA1HtrA serine peptidase 11.79
 17012392RSPO3R-spondin 31.69
 16737590SYT13Synaptotagmin XIII1.66
 16997795 VCAN-AS1VCAN antisense RNA 11.66
 16852849 SERPINB11Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 11 (gene/pseudogene)1.63
 16958382MUC13Mucin 13, cell surface associated1.62
 16713762ANXA8L1Annexin A8-like 11.61
 16851950miR3975MicroRNA 39751.59
 17060820MUC12Mucin 12, cell surface associated1.58
 16705934CHST3Carbohydrate (chondroitin 6) sulfotransferase 31.58
 16677556TGFB2Transforming growth factor, β21.57
 16704614ANXA8Annexin A81.55
 16704516ANXA8L2Annexin A8-like 21.55
 16957304ZBED2Zinc finger, BED-type containing 21.54
 16960922RARRES1Retinoic acid receptor responder (tazarotene induced) 11.51
 17067696NRG1Neuregulin 11.50
 16697674 LINC00862Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 8621.50
Genes expressed at a lower level in A549 tumors after hATMSC injection (p<0.05, fold-change >1.5)
 16971272EDNRAEndothelin receptor type A−4.75
 17113448IL13RA2Interleukin 13 receptor, α2−4.58
 17112149XISTX inactive specific transcript (non-protein coding)−4.44
 16965377SLIT2Slit homolog 2 (Drosophila)−4.32
 16977241NAA11 N(α)-acetyltransferase 11, NatA catalytic subunit−4.22
 17055447MEOX2Mesenchyme homeobox 2−4.11
 17101570 LOC100133123Uncharacterized LOC100133123−4.05
 16870838ZNF208Zinc finger protein 208−4.01
 17001578PDGFRBPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor, β polypeptide−3.93
 16732840OR8G2Olfactory receptor, family 8, subfamily G, member 2−3.91
 16736764MUC15Mucin 15, cell surface associated−3.86
 16870821ZNF100Zinc finger protein 100−3.83
 16909828COL6A3Collagen, type VI, α3−3.72
 16997383F2RL2Coagulation factor II (thrombin) receptor-like 2−3.68
 16979875PCDH18Protocadherin 18−3.62
 17058002 LOC650226Ankyrin repeat domain 26 pseudogene−3.56
 16942958EPHA3EPH receptor A3−3.52
 17108003BGNBiglycan−3.51
 16852966 CCDC102BCoiled-coil domain containing 102B−3.51
 17097661TNCTenascin C−3.45
 17078870MMP16Matrix metallopeptidase 16 (membrane-inserted)−3.32
 16772888 RNU6-52PRNA, U6 small nuclear 52, pseudogene−3.29
 16870854ZNF676Zinc finger protein 676−3.21
 16888610COL3A1Collagen, type III, α1−3.13
 16923842COL6A1Collagen, type VI, α1−3.13
 16666509IFI44Interferon-induced protein 44−3.08
 17107835MAGEA4Melanoma antigen family A, 4−3.04
 17107867MAGEA6Melanoma antigen family A, 6−3.02
 16673075DDR2Discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2−3.00
 16885596POTEJPOTE ankyrin domain family, member J−2.97

a Each value represents the fold-change (in log2 value) vs. the control group. hATMSCs, human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Table II

Genes showing differential expression in the hATMSC-treated HT-29 tumors ranked by fold-change.

Table II

Genes showing differential expression in the hATMSC-treated HT-29 tumors ranked by fold-change.

Probe setGeneGene descriptionFold-changea
Genes expressed at a higher level in the HT-29 tumors after hATMSC injection (p<0.05, fold-change >1.5)
 16703429 RNA5SP307RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 3070.97
 17016490 HIST1H2AJHistone cluster 1, H2aj0.91
 16761541PRB4Proline-rich protein BstNI subfamily 40.85
 17063776TRBV6-8T cell receptor β variable 6-80.77
 16854216 miR133A1MicroRNA 133a-10.74
 16943350GPR128G protein-coupled receptor 1280.67
 17117463 LOC100509635Uncharacterized LOC1005096350.64
 17063800TRBV7-4T cell receptor β variable 7-4 (gene/pseudogene)0.63
 16904484 SNORA70FSmall nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 70F0.61
Genes expressed at a lower level in the HT-29 tumors after hATMSC injection (p<0.05, fold-change >1.5)
 16691574 RNA5SP56RNA, 5S ribosomal pseudogene 56−1.05
 16798050PAR-SNPaternally expressed transcript PAR-SN−0.74
 17114740SPANXN3SPANX family, member N3−0.74
 16798146 SNORD116-5Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 116-5−0.73
 16798150 SNORD116-5Small nucleolar RNA, C/D box 116-5−0.73
 16734339miR4298MicroRNA 4298−0.72
 16716369 miR4679-2MicroRNA 4679-2−0.70
 16743207 TRIM51EPTripartite motif-containing 51E, pseudogene−0.68
 16853028 LOC100505817Uncharacterized LOC100505817−0.64
 16767367 miR3913-1MicroRNA 3913-1−0.63
 17114772miR891BMicroRNA 891b−0.60
 16696120DPTDermatopontin−0.59
 17096623BAATBile acid CoA: amino acid N-acyltransferase (glycine N-choloyltransferase)−0.59
 16704464NPY4RNeuropeptide Y receptor Y4−0.59

a Each value represents the fold-change (in log2 value) vs. the control group. hATMSCs, human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Among the genes differentially expressed in the xenograft tumors after the hATMSC injection, histone cluster 1, H2aj (HIST1H2AJ) was expressed in direct proportion to the xenograft tumor size. In other words, it was expressed at lower level in the A549 tumors and was expressed at a higher level in the HT-29 tumors after the hATMSC injection in comparison to the respective control groups. In addition, neuropeptide Y receptor Y4 (NPY4R) and LOC100505817 were expressed in inverse proportion to the xenograft tumor size. They were expressed at a higher level in the A549 tumors and were expressed at a lower level in the HT-29 tumors after the hATMSC injection in comparison to the respective control groups (Fig. 4A and C).

Functional classification of genes showing differential expression in the hATMSC-treated xenograft tumors

In order to identify the biological function of the genes differentially expressed following the hATMSC injection in the A549 and HT-29 tumor models using hairless SCID mice, GO analysis was performed. The statistically significant categories of GO terms [p<0.01; false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05] are shown in Table III. No enriched GO term was altered following treatment with the hATMSCs in the HT-29 tumors, whereas the genes involved in biological processes, such as 'Regulation of growth' and 'Regulation of cell growth' were upregulated in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors. The genes involved in biological processes, such as 'Nucleosome assembly', 'Nucleosome organization', 'Protein-DNA complex assembly', 'Chromatin assembly or disassembly', 'Cell-cell adhesion' and 'Regulation of transcription (DNA-dependent)' were downregulated in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors.

Table III

GO terms associated with upregulated and downregulated trends in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors (p<0.01, FDR<0.05).

Table III

GO terms associated with upregulated and downregulated trends in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors (p<0.01, FDR<0.05).

GO IDBiological process termGene countP-valueBenjaminiFDR
Upregulated trend
 GO:0040008Regulation of growth241.19E-050.02580.021
 GO:0001558Regulation of cell growth172.37E-050.02560.041
Downregulated trend
 GO:0006334Nucleosome assembly249.31E-112.44E-071.65E-07
 GO:0034728Nucleosome organization251.41E-101.85E-072.51E-07
 GO:0031497Chromatin assembly242.02E-101.77E-073.58E-07
 GO:0065004Protein-DNA complex assembly245.37E-103.53E-079.52E-07
 GO:0006323DNA packaging278.47E-104.45E-071.50E-06
 GO:0006333Chromatin assembly or disassembly281.15E-095.02E-072.03E-06
 GO:0006350Transcription1759.61E-093.60E-061.70E-05
 GO:0006355Regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent1513.65E-081.20E-056.47E-05
 GO:0051252Regulation of RNA metabolic process1535.05E-081.47E-058.96E-05
 GO:0034621Cellular macromolecular complex subunit organization455.14E-071.35E-049.12E-04
 GO:0034622Cellular macromolecular complex assembly411.01E-062.41E-040.002
 GO:0006325Chromatin organization461.01E-062.22E-040.002
 GO:0016339Calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion101.91E-063.85E-040.003
 GO:0045449Regulation of transcription1936.37E-060.00120.011
 GO:0051276Chromosome organization527.69E-060.00130.014

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; FDR, false discovery rate.

Effects of the hATMSCs on the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 in the A549 and HT-29 tumors in vivo and in vitro

The proteins extracted from the xenograft tumor masses of the hairless SCID mice were analyzed by western blot analysis to investigate whether there is a relationship between certain cell signaling pathways and the hATMSC-associated modulation of tumor growth. Among several proteins related to cell signaling pathways, the expression level of phosphorylated NF-κB p65 was reduced by 31% in the hATMSC-injected A549 tumor, whereas it was increased by 77% in the hATMSC-injected HT-29 tumors (Fig. 5A and B). The levels of other cell signaling-related proteins, such as p-JAK3 and p-STAT3, were not affected by the hATMSCs in the A549 and HT-29 tumors, and the β-catenin protein level was elevated by the hATMSCs in the HT-29 tumors, yet not affected in the A549 tumors, providing a possible correlation between the NF-κB pathway and hATMSC-related tumor modulation, at least in the A549 and the HT-29 tumors.

Changes in phosphorylated NF-κB p65 in the tumor masses in vivo were confirmed using flow cytometric analysis in the cancer cells indirectly co-cultured with the hATMSCs, which revealed significant reductions in phosphorylated NF-κB p65 by 12, 25 and 32% in the co-culture of the A549 cancer cells with the hATMSCs at the ratios of 10:0.5, 10:1 and 10:2, respectively, compared with the control (10:0) (Fig. 5C). However, there was an inverse effect in the HT-29 cancer cells, showing a profound increase in phosphorylated NF-κB p65 by 15% in the co-culture of HT-29 cancer cells with the hATMSCs at the ratio of 10:2.

Discussion

In the present study, we found conflicting results concerning the effects of the hATMSCs on tumor growth, particularly in the A549 and HT-29 tumors which were suppressed and supported, respectively, by the hATMSCs. It is possible that the dual effect of MSCs can be dependent on tumor type, at least partially, although these two cell lines do not represent the types of cancer that they are derived from. Thus, further analysis is needed to verify the actual factors in different microenvironment induced by different cancer cells rather than attempting to propose the type of tumor as the reason.

A recent study showed that direct cell-to-cell interaction between cancer cells and MSCs is responsible for the effects of MSCs on tumor growth (32). Although we also observed this result when hATMSCs were directly injected at the tumor site in the xenograft tumor models in vivo, our hypothesis is that this effect of hATMSCs on tumor growth could be indirect according to the results of previous studies (14,33). The hATMSCs showed dual effects such as a strong inhibitory effect on the A549 cancer cell viability and a dramatic promoting effect on the HT-29 cancer cell viability in vitro. In particular, in consistent with a study by Fierro et al (34), the hATMSCs showed a similar impact on cell viability between direct and indirect co-culture in our experiments using in vitro co-culture systems, indicating that the hATMSCs affected tumor cell growth even without direct cell-to-cell contact possibly due to certain soluble factors in the conditioned medium released from the hATMSCs. Among the many MSC-related soluble factors, proangiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (34), fibroblast growth factor (35), and angiopoietin-1 (36), promote endothelial and smooth muscle migration and proliferation at the tumor site, facilitating angiogenesis. In addition, there are factors such as interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor α (37) that are produced by MSCs and have immunosuppressive effects and eventually tumor supporting effects. Karnoub et al (21) reported that MSC-secreted chemokine ligand 5 induced a transient pro-metastatic effect on breast cancer cells. Meanwhile, ATMSCs were found to inhibit the proliferation in primary leukemia cells by secreting DKK-1, which exhibits an inhibitory effect on β-catenin signaling (15,24). Further studies are necessary to analyze which hATMSC-releasing factors contribute to the effect of hATMSCs on tumor growth.

The tumor growth was differentially mediated by hATMSCs between the A549 and the HT-29 tumors with in vivo xenograft models. For functional classification of the genes that were expressed differentially following treatment with the hATMSCs in the A549 and HT-29 tumors, GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed. Noteworthy, 17 enriched GO categories were identified in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors (p<0.01, FDR<0.05), whereas no GO terms were identified in the HT-29 tumors. The GO analysis clearly showed that the treatment of the A549 tumors with the hATMSCs upregulated the expression of many genes associated with 'Regulation of cell growth', which has been known to be induced by a potential anticancer drug (38). In contrast, 'Regulation of transcription (DNA-dependent)' and 'Cell-cell adhesion', which have been previously reported to be upregulated in xenograft tumor models and in cancer cell lines (39,40), were suppressed in the A549 tumors following treatment with the hATMSCs. Lo et al (41) showed that GO biological processes, including 'Nucleosome assembly', 'Nucleosome organization', 'Protein-DNA complex assembly' and 'Chromatin assembly or disassembly' were found to be altered in Asian and Caucasian lung cancer patients. 'Nucleosome assembly' has also been known as a process which alters the regulatory mechanisms of cancer cells (42). In the present study, the hATMSCs downregulated the above-mentioned biological processes in the A549 tumors. In particular, the KEGG pathway analysis indicated that 'Small cell lung cancer pathway' in the downregulated trend gene set was significant in the hATMSC-treated A549 tumors (p<0.05) (data not shown). These findings presented here, suggesting that biological processes possibly associated with the tumor modulation, are active in only A549 tumors, can provide important implications to verify the dual effects of the hATMSCs.

To identify possible genetic factors for hATMSC-induced tumor modulation, the differentially expressed genes in proportion to xenograft tumor size following hATMSC administration were identified. Histone proteins, which are basic nuclear proteins responsible for the nucleosome structure of the chromosomal fiber, were expressed from four different clusters in the human genome. In histone cluster 1, mainly histone 1 (e.g. HIST1H1T) and histone 2 (e.g. HIST1H2BC, HIST1H2AC and HIST1H2BD) genes were found to be overexpressed in the cancer tissues (43). Although there are few reports of HIST1H2AJ which is related to cancer directly, HIST1H2AJ (histone cluster 1, H2aj) was found to be expressed in direct proportion to the xenograft tumor size and is likely to be functionally relevant in tumorigenesis. We also found that NPY4R was differentially expressed in inverse proportion to the xenograft A549 and HT-29 tumor size after hATMSC administration. NPY family peptides, one of the most widely distributed peptides in the central and peripheral nervous system, regulate physiological processes associated with energy homeostasis such as energy expenditure, lipid metabolism and insulin secretion through their actions on Y receptors (4447). Moreover, the NPY system is known to be involved in cancer development via effects on energy homeostasis, immune function, as well as direct actions on tumor biology (47), raising the possibility of the involvement of NPY4R expression in the regulation of tumor growth following treatment with hATMSCs.

Cell signaling pathways associated with translational changes have been referenced to explain the mechanisms of the conflicting effects of MSCs on tumors. PI3K/AKT was referred as a possible means related to the tumor-inhibitory effect of umbilical cord MSCs (48). WNT (24) and JAK/STAT pathways (17) were also suggested as cell signaling pathways involved in the effects of MSCs. We additionally investigated the expression levels of certain proteins to determine which cell signaling pathways are related to the effects of hATMSCs on tumor growth. First of all, the hATMSCs affected the levels of phosphorylated NF-κB p65, yet not p-JAK3, p-STAT3 or β-catenin that are also key players in the effects of MSCs on tumors. Second, the hATMSC-induced changes in phosphorylated NF-κB p65 levels were correlated with the hATMSC-associated modulation on A549 and HT-29 tumor growth, suggesting the NF-κB pathway as a potential mediator in the effects of hATMSCs on tumors. The NF-κB pathway is triggered in response to infection or exposure to pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to inhibitor of κB (IκB) degradation and finally translocation of p50/p65 heterodimers into the nucleus. In general, NF-κB regulates a variety of downstream genes that govern immunity, cell growth and apoptosis (49). In the tumor environment, the NF-κB pathway is widely known to regulate the proliferation of tumor cells through the transcription of anti-apoptotic proteins, leading to the increased growth and metastasis of various types of tumors (50). Actually, in the A549 and HT-29 cancer cells, correlations were reported in which cell proliferation was promoted by activation of the NF-κB pathway and suppressed by blocking the NF-κB pathway (51,52), supporting our hypothesis on the possible link of the NF-κB pathway to the tumor growth modulated by hATMSCs.

Given the possibility of MSCs as a novel therapeutic tool for various diseases, it is critical to explain the conflicting findings in tumor-MSC studies. Despite previous reports on the possible factors of MSC-induced tumor modulation, the exact mechanisms remain unclear. The most direct outcome of the present study is that we confirmed the dual effects of hATMSCs in the two types of cancer cells in different micro-environments in vivo and in vitro. We also suggest the possible roles of the identified gene as profiled and the NF-κB pathway in the dual modulatory effects of hATMSCs on tumor growth. Our findings have profound implication in understanding the interaction between MSCs and tumors although further research is needed to confirm these findings using various types of cancer.

Abbreviations:

hATMSCs

human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells

NF-κB

nuclear factor κB

MSCs

mesenchymal stem cells

BM-MSCs

bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

SCID

severe combined immunodeficiency

References

1 

Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop Dj and Horwitz E: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 8:315–317. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Dong J, Uemura T, Shirasaki Y and Tateishi T: Promotion of bone formation using highly pure porous beta-TCP combined with bone marrow-derived osteoprogenitor cells. Biomaterials. 23:4493–4502. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Choi HJ, Kim JM, Kwon E, Che JH, Lee JI, Cho SR, Kang SK, Ra JC and Kang BC: Establishment of efficacy and safety assessment of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hATMSCs) in a nude rat femoral segmental defect model. J Korean Med Sci. 26:482–491. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Toyoshima KE, Asakawa K, Ishibashi N, Toki H, Ogawa M, Hasegawa T, Irié T, Tachikawa T, Sato A, Takeda A, et al: Fully functional hair follicle regeneration through the rearrangement of stem cells and their niches. Nat Commun. 3:7842012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Seo KW, Sohn SY, Bhang DH, Nam MJ, Lee HW and Youn HY: Therapeutic effects of hepatocyte growth factor-overexpressing human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells on liver fibrosis in rats. Cell Biol Int. 38:106–116. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Perez-Basterrechea M, Obaya AJ, Meana A, Otero J and Esteban MM: Cooperation by fibroblasts and bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells to improve pancreatic rat-to-mouse islet xenotransplantation. PLoS One. 8:e735262013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bas E, Van De Water TR, Lumbreras V, Rajguru S, Goss G, Hare JM and Goldstein BJ: Adult human nasal mesenchymal-like stem cells restore cochlear spiral ganglion neurons after experimental lesion. Stem Cells Dev. 23:502–514. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar :

8 

Tian LL, Yue W, Zhu F, Li S and Li W: Human mesenchymal stem cells play a dual role on tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Physiol. 226:1860–1867. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Ra JC, Shin IS, Kim SH, Kang SK, Kang BC, Lee HY, Kim YJ, Jo JY, Yoon EJ, Choi HJ, et al: Safety of intravenous infusion of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in animals and humans. Stem Cells Dev. 20:1297–1308. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

MacIsaac ZM, Shang H, Agrawal H, Yang N, Parker A and Katz AJ: Long-term in-vivo tumorigenic assessment of human culture-expanded adipose stromal/stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 318:416–423. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :

11 

Klopp AH, Gupta A, Spaeth E, Andreeff M and Marini F III: Concise review: Dissecting a discrepancy in the literature: do mesenchymal stem cells support or suppress tumor growth? Stem Cells. 29:11–19. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Maestroni GJ, Hertens E and Galli P: Factor(s) from nonmacrophage bone marrow stromal cells inhibit Lewis lung carcinoma and B16 melanoma growth in mice. Cell Mol Life Sci. 55:663–667. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Khakoo AY, Pati S, Anderson SA, Reid W, Elshal MF, Rovira II, Nguyen AT, Malide D, Combs CA, Hall G, et al: Human mesenchymal stem cells exert potent antitumorigenic effects in a model of Kaposi's sarcoma. J Exp Med. 203:1235–1247. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Li L, Tian H, Chen Z, Yue W, Li S and Li W: Inhibition of lung cancer cell proliferation mediated by human mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 43:143–148. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Zhu W, Xu W, Jiang R, Qian H, Chen M, Hu J, Cao W, Han C and Chen Y: Mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow favor tumor cell growth in vivo. Exp Mol Pathol. 80:267–274. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Xu WT, Bian ZY, Fan QM, Li G and Tang TT: Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) target osteosarcoma and promote its growth and pulmonary metastasis. Cancer Lett. 281:32–41. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Tsai KS, Yang SH, Lei YP, Tsai CC, Chen HW, Hsu CY, Chen LL, Wang HW, Miller SA, Chiou SH, et al: Mesenchymal stem cells promote formation of colorectal tumors in mice. Gastroenterology. 141:1046–1056. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Roorda BD, ter Elst A, Kamps WA and de Bont ES: Bone marrow-derived cells and tumor growth: Contribution of bone marrow-derived cells to tumor microenvironments with special focus on mesenchymal stem cells. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 69:187–198. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Mishra PJ, Mishra PJ, Humeniuk R, Medina DJ, Alexe G, Mesirov JP, Ganesan S, Glod JW and Banerjee D: Carcinoma-associated fibroblast-like differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cancer Res. 68:4331–4339. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Plumas J, Chaperot L, Richard MJ, Molens JP, Bensa JC and Favrot MC: Mesenchymal stem cells induce apoptosis of activated T cells. Leukemia. 19:1597–1604. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Karnoub AE, Dash AB, Vo AP, Sullivan A, Brooks MW, Bell GW, Richardson AL, Polyak K, Tubo R and Weinberg RA: Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 449:557–563. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Lu YR, Yuan Y, Wang XJ, Wei LL, Chen YN, Cong C, Li SF, Long D, Tan WD, Mao YQ, et al: The growth inhibitory effect of mesenchymal stem cells on tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Biol Ther. 7:245–251. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Otsu K, Das S, Houser SD, Quadri SK, Bhattacharya S and Bhattacharya J: Concentration-dependent inhibition of angiogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells. Blood. 113:4197–4205. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar :

24 

Qiao L, Xu ZL, Zhao TJ, Ye LH and Zhang XD: Dkk-1 secreted by mesenchymal stem cells inhibits growth of breast cancer cells via depression of Wnt signalling. Cancer Lett. 269:67–77. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Kubota T, Yamaguchi H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto T, Takahara T, Takeuchi T, Furukawa T, Kase S, Kodaira S, Ishibiki K, et al: Growth of human tumor xenografts in nude mice and mice with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). Surg Today. 23:375–377. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Denicolaï E, Baeza-Kallee N, Tchoghandjian A, Carré M, Colin C, Jiglaire CJ, Mercurio S, Beclin C and Figarella-Branger D: Proscillaridin A is cytotoxic for glioblastoma cell lines and controls tumor xenograft growth in vivo. Oncotarget. 5:10934–10948. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Yun JW, Lee TR, Kim CW, Park YH, Chung JH, Lee YS, Kang KS and Lim KM: Predose blood gene expression profiles might identify the individuals susceptible to carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Sci. 115:12–21. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Seo HG and Lee JS: Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2013. Cancer Res Treat. 45:15–21. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Paine-Murrieta GD, Taylor CW, Curtis RA, Lopez MH, Dorr RT, Johnson CS, Funk CY, Thompson F and Hersh EM: Human tumor models in the severe combined immune deficient (scid) mouse. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 40:209–214. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Hao Y, Huang W, Liao M, Zhu Y, Liu H, Hao C, Liu G, Zhang G, Feng H, Ning X, et al: The inhibition of resveratrol to human skin squamous cell carcinoma A431 xenografts in nude mice. Fitoterapia. 86:84–91. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Ansari D, Bauden MP, Sasor A, Gundewar C and Andersson R: Analysis of MUC4 expression in human pancreatic cancer xenografts in immunodeficient mice. Anticancer Res. 34:3905–3910. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Uchibori R, Tsukahara T, Mizuguchi H, Saga Y, Urabe M, Mizukami H, Kume A and Ozawa K: NF-κB activity regulates mesenchymal stem cell accumulation at tumor sites. Cancer Res. 73:364–372. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Kéramidas M, de Fraipont F, Karageorgis A, Moisan A, Persoons V, Richard MJ, Coll JL and Rome C: The dual effect of mesenchymal stem cells on tumour growth and tumour angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 4:412013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Fierro FA, Sierralta WD, Epuñan MJ and Minguell JJ: Marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Role in epithelial tumor cell determination. Clin Exp Metastasis. 21:313–319. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Potapova IA, Gaudette GR, Brink PR, Robinson RB, Rosen MR, Cohen IS and Doronin SV: Mesenchymal stem cells support migration, extracellular matrix invasion, proliferation, and survival of endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cells. 25:1761–1768. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Qiao L, Xu Z, Zhao T, Zhao Z, Shi M, Zhao RC, Ye L and Zhang X: Suppression of tumorigenesis by human mesenchymal stem cells in a hepatoma model. Cell Res. 18:500–507. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Abdel aziz MT, El Asmar MF, Atta HM, Mahfouz S, Fouad HH, Roshdy NK, Rashed LA, Sabry D, Hassouna AA and Taha FM: Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in suppression of hepatocarcinorigenesis in rats: Possible role of Wnt signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 30:492011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Kim BY, Lee J, Park SJ, Bang OS and Kim NS: Gene expression profile of the A549 human non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line following treatment with the seeds of Descurainia sophia, a potential anticancer drug. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013:5846042013.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Creighton C, Kuick R, Misek DE, Rickman DS, Brichory FM, Rouillard JM, Omenn GS and Hanash S: Profiling of pathway-specific changes in gene expression following growth of human cancer cell lines transplanted into mice. Genome Biol. 4:R462003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Lu C, Xiong M, Luo Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Dong Y, Zhu Y, Niu T, Wang Z and Duan L: Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of apoptosis-related genes and pathways regulated by H2AX in lung cancer A549 cells. Apoptosis. 18:1039–1047. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Lo FY, Chang JW, Chang IS, Chen YJ, Hsu HS, Huang SF, Tsai FY, Jiang SS, Kanteti R, Nandi S, et al: The database of chromosome imbalance regions and genes resided in lung cancer from Asian and Caucasian identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization. BMC Cancer. 12:2352012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Yang B, Zhang J, Yin Y and Zhang Y: Network-based inference framework for identifying cancer genes from gene expression data. BioMed Res Int. 2013:4016492013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Kavak E, Unlü M, Nistér M and Koman A: Meta-analysis of cancer gene expression signatures reveals new cancer genes, SAGE tags and tumor associated regions of co-regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:7008–7021. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Herzog H: Neuropeptide Y and energy homeostasis: Insights from Y receptor knockout models. Eur J Pharmacol. 480:21–29. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Renshaw D and Batterham RL: Peptide YY: A potential therapy for obesity. Curr Drug Targets. 6:171–179. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Huda MS, Wilding JP and Pinkney JH: Gut peptides and the regulation of appetite. Obes Rev. 7:163–182. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Zhang L, Bijker MS and Herzog H: The neuropeptide Y system: Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications in obesity and cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 131:91–113. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Ma Y, Hao X, Zhang S and Zhang J: The in vitro and in vivo effects of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on the growth of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 133:473–485. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Escárcega RO, Fuentes-Alexandro S, García-Carrasco M, Gatica A and Zamora A: The transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B and cancer. Clin Oncol. 19:154–161. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Pikarsky E and Ben-Neriah Y: NF-kappaB inhibition: A double-edged sword in cancer? Eur J Cancer. 42:779–784. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Zhang J, Xu YJ, Xiong WN, Zhang ZX, Du CL, Qiao LF, Ni W and Chen SX: Inhibition of NF-kappaB through IkappaBalpha transfection affects invasion of human lung cancer cell line A549. Ai Zheng. 27:710–715. 2008.In Chinese. PubMed/NCBI

52 

Kuliková L, Mikeš J, Hýžďalová M, Palumbo G and Fedoročko P: NF-κB is not directly responsible for photoresistance induced by fractionated light delivery in HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells. Photochem Photobiol. 86:1285–1293. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2015
Volume 34 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Rhyu JJ, Yun J, Kwon E, Che J and Kang B: Dual effects of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 xenografts and colorectal adenocarcinoma HT-29 xenografts in mice. Oncol Rep 34: 1733-1744, 2015.
APA
Rhyu, J.J., Yun, J., Kwon, E., Che, J., & Kang, B. (2015). Dual effects of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 xenografts and colorectal adenocarcinoma HT-29 xenografts in mice. Oncology Reports, 34, 1733-1744. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4185
MLA
Rhyu, J. J., Yun, J., Kwon, E., Che, J., Kang, B."Dual effects of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 xenografts and colorectal adenocarcinoma HT-29 xenografts in mice". Oncology Reports 34.4 (2015): 1733-1744.
Chicago
Rhyu, J. J., Yun, J., Kwon, E., Che, J., Kang, B."Dual effects of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 xenografts and colorectal adenocarcinoma HT-29 xenografts in mice". Oncology Reports 34, no. 4 (2015): 1733-1744. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4185