Protein kinase, membrane‑associated tyrosine/threonine 1 is associated with the progression of colorectal cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: April 13, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6371
- Pages: 2829-2836
Abstract
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer worldwide, and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with an incidence of more than one million new cases per year (1–5). In addition, a significant increase of the incidence rates in CRC in both sexes has been reported, in Korea from 1999 to 2010 (4). The development and progression of CRC occur over several years with distinct molecular and cytological characteristics, eventually leading to a carcinoma with a higher risk of invasion and metastasis (3,6). The prevalent metastasis of CRC is to the lymph node and the liver, which influence approximately half of CRC patients, with a poor survival rate after the diagnosis (7–9). It has been demonstrated that one of the important factors causing progression and poor prognosis of cancer is metastasis (10–12). Though tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) classification and staging systems are widely used to predict prognosis of CRC patients, it remains difficult to precisely predict prognosis (13). Thus, it has been suggested that it is urgently required to identify specific biomarkers to improve the outcomes of patients with CRC (14).
The cell cycle is tightly regulated to prevent premature cell cycle progression, leading to faithful gene replication and segregation (15). Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 also known as CDK1 or cell division cycle 2 (CDC2) is an essential enzyme in cell cycle progression, particularly in the regulation of the G2/M cell cycle transition (16). The activity of CDK1 is regulated by cyclin binding and phosphorylation (17). The phosphorylation of CDK1 at Tyr15 and Thr14 residues leads to the inactivation of CDK1, resulting in a blockade of the transition from G2 to the mitotic phase (17). The protein kinase, membrane-associated tyrosine/threonine 1 (PKMYT1) was originally identified from Xenopus laevis as Myt1, a membrane-associated inhibitory kinase that phosphorylates CDK1 efficiently on both threonine-14 and tyrosine-15 (18). Subsequently, it was cloned from human with 46% identification to Xenopus laevis PKMYT1 and localization to the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex (19). Thus, PKMYT1 was demonstrated to inhibit the progression of the cell cycle through the phosphorylation of CDK1. In addition, it was revealed that PKMYT1 was required to induce apoptosis, leading to the suppression of skin cancer development induced by UVA (20). Recently, however, several studies reported that although PKMYT1 is dispensable for the normal cell cycle, it has a rate-limiting function during checkpoint recovery after DNA damage or it is an essential molecule in glioblastoma stem-like cells, thus highlighting a potential role of PKMYT1 as a therapeutic target (21,22). Since the functional importance of PKMYT1 in CRC remains unknown, it is important to comprehend whether PKYMT1 is indispensable in CRC. Thus, using CRC cell lines and patient-derived samples, we addressed these issues and reported that PKMYT1 was essential in the progression of CRC.
Materials and methods
Cell lines
Human CRC cell lines SW480, SW620, HCT116 and HT29 were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB; Seoul, Korea). Cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Welgene, Geyongsan, Korea) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
siRNA and transfection
The siRNAs were obtained from Bioneer Corporation (Daejeon, Korea) (RNAi nos. 1117350, 1117347 and 1117348) and transfected using HiPerFect Transfection reagent (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
RNA extraction and realtime qPCR
RNA was isolated using RiboEx solution (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea), and converted to cDNA using ReverTra Ace® qPCR kit (Toyobo Life Science, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To determine the level of gene expression, RT-qPCR was performed using the qPCR Master Mix kit (Toyobo Life Science). The primer sequences for RT-qPCR are listed in Table I.
Western blot analysis
Cell lysates were harvested using Pro-Prep (Intron Biotechnology Inc., Seongnam, Korea) and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Protein concentration of the supernatant was determined by Bio-Rad Protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The protein extract was resolved using 10% polyacrylamide gel and electro-transferred onto a 0.45-µm hybridization nitrocellulose filter (HATF) membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) using Trans-Blot Turbo (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Membranes were immunoblotted with either mouse anti-PKMYT1 primary antibody (cat. no. NBP2-2275; Novus Biologicals, LLC, Littleton, CO, USA) diluted 1:500 in TBS-T or rabbit polyclonal anti-actin antibody (cat. no. ab179467; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C. The membranes were incubated with either HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (cat. no. 7071; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) or HRP-linked anti-mouse immunoglobulin (cat. no. 7076; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. The protein signal was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) using the Amersham Imager 600 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chalfont, UK).
Invasion and migration
Cell migration and invasion were analyzed in vitro using the Transwell insert system (Corning Incorporated) without or with coating by 20 µl of Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, USA). The culture insert was attached on the bottom of a 24-well plate and 100 µl of serum-free medium containing 1.0×105 cells was seeded into each well. Six-hundred microliters of media containing 10% FBS were added outside the Transwell culture insert. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 48 h in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Transwells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and cleaned using cotton swaps. The cells were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 15 min, washed twice with PBS, stained with 0.1% of crystal violet for 15 min and then observed using an inverted microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany).
Semi-solid agar colony forming assay
Cell culture media containing 20% FBS was mixed with 1% agarose at 1:1 ratio and was solidified after dropping a few drops. After mixing the cell-containing media with agarose to make 0.35% agarose, cells were spread and incubated for 17 days at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator.
Human colorectal carcinoma specimens
A total of 179 colorectal carcinoma tissue specimens were obtained from Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital (Cheonan, Korea), where samples were collected from patients who underwent surgery between March 2002 and May 2006. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standard of the Ethics Committee of Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital. These tissues were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE). Clinicopathological data including age, sex, TNM classification, invasion of blood vessel and lymphatic vessel are listed at Table II. Tumor stage was identified according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer's TNM classification system.
Tissue microarray (TMA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay
Immunohistochemical staining was performed using tissue microarray (TMA) block sections to determine the expression of PKMYT1 in CRC patient samples. Each TMA block contained 60 cores (2 mm of size) from 30 samples. For immunohistochemistry, 4-µm sections were obtained using a microtome, deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in 100–70% alcohol series. Antigen retrieval was achieved in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) using a microwave for 15 min. To eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity, the sections were incubated in peroxidase blocking solution (Dako; Agilent Technologies GmbH, Waldbronn, Germany) for 30 min and then washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST). The sections were incubated with anti-PKMYT1 antibody (1:10 dilution; cat. no. NBP2-2275; Novus Biologicals, LLC) for 2 h at room temperature, followed by a secondary antibody for 1 h 30 min at room temperature. After being washed with PBST, the sections were incubated with DAB and observed under a light microscope.
IHC data analysis
The PKMYT1-stained tissue cores were examined and a consensus score was determined for each specimen. A positive reaction was scored into 4 grades, according to the intensity of the staining as follows: 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+. The percentages of PKMYT1-positive cells were also scored into 4 categories as follows: 0, 0; 1, 1–30; 2, 31–70; and 3, 71–100%. The final score, calculated as the product of the intensity score multiplied by the percentage score, was classified as follows: 0 for negative; 1–3 for weak; 4–6 for moderate; and 7–9 for strong. Samples with a final score ≤3 were grouped together as PKMYT1-expression negative while those with a score ≥4 were grouped together as PKMYT1-expression positive.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp., Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) program. The results of RT-qPCR, migration and invasion were analyzed with Student's t-test. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of clinicopathological data were evaluated using Cox regression models. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyse disease-free survival rate using the log-rank test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.
Results
siRNA-mediated knockdown of PKMYT1
Since it was revealed that PKYMT1 may be an interesting target in an anticancer therapy (21,22), we tried to determine whether PKMYT1 was functionally important in CRC using siRNA. CRC cell lines including SW480, SW620, HCT116 and HT29 were transduced with either control or PKMYT1 siRNA. To determine the expression level of PKMYT1, RNA was extracted from transduced cells. The expression level of PKMYT1 was significantly lower in PKMYT1-inhibited cells by siRNA compared to control-transduced cells (Fig. 1A). Since mRNA expression is not always consistent with protein level, we analyzed the level of PKMYT1 protein after siRNA-mediated PKMYT1 knockdown. Immunoblot analysis using cell lysates obtained from siRNA-transduced cells revealed that PKMYT1 siRNA-transduced CRC cell lines expressed much lower level of PKMYT1 protein compared to the control cells (Fig. 1B). From these data, we confirmed that the expression of PKMYT1 was significantly inhibited by siRNA-mediated depletion at both the RNA and protein level.
The proliferation and colony-forming ability of CRC cell lines are defective by the knockdown of PKMYT1
We tested whether PKMYT1 was implicated in the growth of CRC cells using MTT assay after PKMYT1 knockdown. The proliferation rate of control or PKMYT1 siRNA-transfected SW480, HCT116, SW620 and HT29 cell lines was analyzed every 24 h for 3 days. The proliferation rate of PKMYT1-depleted CRC cells was significantly decreased starting from 24 h up to 72 h in the tested CRC cell lines (Fig. 2). To check the anchorage-independent growth of CRC cell lines after knocking down PKMYT1, semi-solid soft-agar colony forming ability was tested. Control or PKMYT1 siRNA-transfected CRC cell lines were seeded on soft-agar, and colony number and size were determined. The colony size in PKMYT1-knockdown cells was much smaller than that of control cells (Fig. 3). Notably, as displayed in Fig. 3, the number of colonies was significantly decreased in PKMYT1-siRNA transfected CRC cell lines compared to the control (SW480, 161 vs. 106; SW620, 211 vs. 87; HCT116, 175 vs. 83; HT29, 190 vs. 101).
PKMYT1 is required for the mobility of CRC cell lines
We examined the mobility change after knocking down PKMYT1 in CRC cells to determine whether PKMYT1 was essential in the progression of CRC. CRC cell lines SW480, SW620, HCT116 and HT29 were transfected with either control or PKMYT1 siRNA. Transduced cells were seeded on the Transwell system and incubated for 48 h to assess the migratory ability. The migration of cancer cells was evaluated by counting the cells on the inserts of the Transwell system after staining. PKMYT1 siRNA-transfected cells migrated ~14–38% less than control-transduced cells (Fig. 4A and B). To examine whether PKMYT1 was essential for the invasion of cancer cells in vitro, control or PKMYT1-knockdown cells were plated on a Matrigel-coated insert of a Transwell system and incubated for 48 h. PKMYT1 siRNA-transfected cells exhibited an invasion ability ~25–40% less than the control-transduced cells (Fig. 4C and D). These results indicated that PKMYT1 is indispensable for the mobility of CRC cells, thus possibly contributing to the progression of CRC.
The association of PKMYT1 with a poor prognosis of CRC patients
Following the characterization of the pivotal function of PKMYT1 in CRC cell lines in vitro, we determined the biological relevance of PKMYT1 to a patient prognosis model. The demographic data of the patients analyzed in the present study are provided in Table II. When the correlation of PKMYT1 expression to overall survival (OS) rate was analyzed, we observed that PKMYT1 was closely associated with the OS rate of CRC patients (Fig. 5). Specifically, patients with a high level of PKMYT1 expression had significantly lower overall survival (OS) rate than patients with low expression of PKMYT1 (45.7 vs. 62.4%, P=0.023; Fig. 5C). In addition, PKMYT1 positivity was correlated with other clinicopathological variables by Cox regression analysis including lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion and clinical stage (Table III). These results indicated the close association of PKMYT1 with poor prognosis of CRC patients.
Table III.Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of the relative risk of death according to the expression of PKMYT1. |
Discussion
In the present study, we found that PKMYT1 was essential for the proliferation and mobility of CRC cells in vitro. Depletion of the expression of PKMYT1 by siRNA resulted in impaired proliferation, anchorage-independent colony forming ability and mobility of CRC cells. In addition, using patient-derived samples, we demonstrated that patients expressing a high level of PKMYT1 displayed a worse overall survival rate than those with a low level of PKMYT1. Thus, these results indicated that PKMYT1 was a biomarker for the prediction of the prognosis of the disease. In agreement with our findings, several other studies have also recently reported that PKMYT1 was essential in several cancers such as glioblastoma, however not in normal cells and a promising target in developing chemotherapeutics (21,22).
It is well established that CDK1 is a key molecule in the progression of mitosis and becomes inactivated when phosphorylated by WEE1 (23,24). Although CDK1 is also phosphorylated by PKMYT1, the contribution of PKMYT1 in normal or cancer cells without DNA damage appears relatively minor. Chow et al (21) revealed that the cell cycle or mitosis timing in HeLa cells was not affected by the depletion of PKMYT1 without DNA damage. However, PKMYT1 knockdown with DNA damaging agents such as adriamycin or irradiation was able to significantly inhibit cell survival (21). In human neural stem cells, it was demonstrated that PKMYT1 and WEE1 are redundant. However, in glioblastoma cells, depletion of PKMYT1 led to a dramatic increase in cell death and cytokinesis failure (22). Previously, only WEE1 had been studied as a potential therapeutic target in chemotherapy since PKMYT was considered not essential or redundant. However, our data along with other studies indicated that PKMYT1 was essentially required in several cancers including CRC. Furthermore, it is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to demonstrate that PKMYT1 was implicated in the progression of CRC.
It has been suggested that metastatic spread of CRC is one of the pivotal factors leading to a high level of mortality in CRC patients. Thus, to improve the survival rates of CRC patients, it is required to identify essential signaling pathways implicated in metastasis (25,26). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), an important process in tumor progression, is involved in several aspects including invasion, metastasis and drug resistance (27–34). In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, PKMYT1 has been shown to regulate EMT by activating beta-catenin/TCF signaling (35). In the present study, we also found that depletion of PKMYT1 impaired the mobility of CRC cells, a function that is related to EMT, proposing that PKMYT1 was an essential molecule in the progression of CRC. Thus, developing small molecules that block the function of PKMYT1 could be an effective way to inhibit the progression of the disease.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund and the grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHID), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant no. HI15C1647).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
DJ, HYK and MJB conceived and designed the study. DJ, HK, DK, SB, SO, HL, DK, TSA, SBB, MSL and SJ performed the experiments. HYK and MJB wrote the paper. HJK and CJK reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital and Soonchunhyang University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
Van Roosbroeck S, Hoeck S and Van Hal G: Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: A comparison of two invitation strategies. Cancer Epidemiol. 36:e317–e324. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Elias E, Mukherji D, Faraj W, Khalife M, Dimassi H, Eloubeidi M, Hattoum H, Abou-Alfa GK, Saleh A and Shamseddine A: Lymph-node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage III colorectal cancer: A retrospective study from the Middle East. World J Surg Oncol. 10:632012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deschoolmeester V, Baay M, Specenier P, Lardon F and Vermorken JB: A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: One step closer to targeted therapy. Oncologist. 15:699–731. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Seo HG and Lee JS: Cancer statistics in Korea: Incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Res Treat. 45:1–14. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J and Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 60:277–300. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Michor F, Iwasa Y, Lengauer C and Nowak MA: Dynamics of colorectal cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 15:484–493. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Satram-Hoang S, Lee L, Yu S, Guduru SR, Gunuganti AR, Reyes C and McKenna E: Comparative effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 44:79–88. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tol J and Punt CJ: Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A review. Clin Ther. 32:437–453. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang L, Chen X, Li W and Sheng Z: Antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody improves survival outcomes in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 23:155–160. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wilke HJ and Van Cutsem E: Current treatments and future perspectives in colorectal and gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 14 Suppl 2:ii49–ii55. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chan KM, Wu TH, Cheng CH, Lee WC, Chiang JM, Chen JS and Wang JY: Prognostic significance of the number of tumors and aggressive surgical approach in colorectal cancer hepatic metastasis. World J Surg Oncol. 12:1552014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Swiderska M, Choromanska B, Dabrowska E, Konarzewska-Duchnowska E, Choromańska K, Szczurko G, Myśliwiec P, Dadan J, Ladny JR and Zwierz K: The diagnostics of colorectal cancer. Contemp Oncol. 18:1–6. 2014. | |
Feigelson HS, Zeng C, Pawloski PA, Onitilo AA, Richards CS, Johnson MA, Kauffman TL, Webster J, Nyirenda C, Alexander GL, et al: Does KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer impact overall survival? A comparative effectiveness study in a population-based sample. PLoS One. 9:e949772014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schee K, Lorenz S, Worren MM, Günther CC, Holden M, Hovig E, Fodstad O, Meza-Zepeda LA and Flatmark K: Deep sequencing the MicroRNA transcriptome in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 8:e661652013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Elledge SJ: Cell cycle checkpoints: Preventing an identity crisis. Science. 274:1664–1672. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rhind N and Russell P: Signaling pathways that regulate cell division. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4:pii:a0059422012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Norbury C, Blow J and Nurse P: Regulatory phosphorylation of the p34cdc2 protein kinase in vertebrates. EMBO J. 10:3321–3329. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mueller PR, Coleman TR, Kumagai A and Dunphy WG: Myt1: A membrane-associated inhibitory kinase that phosphorylates Cdc2 on both threonine-14 and tyrosine-15. Science. 270:86–90. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu F, Stanton JJ, Wu Z and Piwnica-Worms H: The human Myt1 kinase preferentially phosphorylates Cdc2 on threonine 14 and localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex. Mol Cell Biol. 17:571–583. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Choi HS, Bode AM, Shim JH, Lee SY and Dong Z: c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 phosphorylates Myt1 to prevent UVA-induced skin cancer. Mol Cell Biol. 29:2168–2180. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chow JP and Poon RY: The CDK1 inhibitory kinase MYT1 in DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Oncogene. 32:4778–4788. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Toledo CM, Ding Y, Hoellerbauer P, Davis RJ, Basom R, Girard EJ, Lee E, Corrin P, Hart T, Bolouri H, et al: Genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens reveal loss of redundancy between PKMYT1 and WEE1 in glioblastoma stem-like cells. Cell Rep. 13:2425–2439. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Parker LL and Piwnica-Worms H: Inactivation of the p34cdc2-cyclin B complex by the human WEE1 tyrosine kinase. Science. 257:1955–1957. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Watanabe N, Broome M and Hunter T: Regulation of the human WEE1Hu CDK tyrosine 15-kinase during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 14:1878–1891. 1995.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chambers AF, Groom AC and MacDonald IC: Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2:563–572. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JJ and Lotze MT: Molecular basis of metastasis. N Engl J Med. 360:1679–1680. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Frisch SM, Schaller M and Cieply B: Mechanisms that link the oncogenic epithelial-mesenchymal transition to suppression of anoikis. J Cell Sci. 126:21–29. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang RY, Chung VY and Thiery JP: Targeting pathways contributing to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in epithelial ovarian cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 13:1649–1653. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jordan NV, Johnson GL and Abell AN: Tracking the intermediate stages of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in epithelial stem cells and cancer. Cell Cycle. 10:2865–2873. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee K and Nelson CM: New insights into the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tissue fibrosis. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 294:171–221. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tam WL and Weinberg RA: The epigenetics of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer. Nat Med. 19:1438–1449. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thiery JP and Sleeman JP: Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 7:131–142. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang J and Weinberg RA: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: At the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev Cell. 14:818–829. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JM, Dedhar S, Kalluri R and Thompson EW: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: New insights in signaling, development, and disease. J Cell Biol. 172:973–981. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu L, Wu J, Wang S, Luo X, Du Y, Huang D, Gu D and Zhang F: PKMYT1 promoted the growth and motility of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by activating beta-catenin/TCF signaling. Exp Cell Res. 358:209–216. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |