Biomechanical comparison of bioresorbable F‑u‑HA/PLLA screw and tension band wire fixation in medial malleolar fractures

Sakai,Hiroaki; Takada,Naoya; Kuroyanagi,Gen; Usami,Takuya; Ueki,Yoshino; Murakami,Hideki

doi:10.3892/wasj.2021.97

Biomechanical comparison of bioresorbable F‑u‑HA/PLLA screw and tension band wire fixation in medial malleolar fractures

Authors:
- Hiroaki Sakai
- Naoya Takada
- Gen Kuroyanagi
- Takuya Usami
- Yoshino Ueki
- Hideki Murakami
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467‑8601, Japan, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kainan Hospital, Yatomi, Aichi 498‑8502, Japan, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467‑8601, Japan
Published online on: March 31, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2021.97
Article Number: 26
Copyright: © Sakai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The authors have recently reported that forged composites of raw particulate unsintered hydroxyapatite/poly‑L‑lactide (F‑u‑HA/PLLA) screws are useful for the treatment of medial malleolar fracture. However, the biomechanical properties of these screws have not yet been fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to compare the biomechanical properties of F‑u‑HA/PLLA screws with those of tension band wiring (TBW) using medial malleolar fracture models obliquely oriented at 45˚ angles in synthetic tibial bones. Fractures were fixed using two 4.5‑mm‑diameter partial thread F‑u‑HA/PLLA screws, two 4.5‑mm‑diameter full thread F‑u‑HA/PLLA screws, or TBW. The fracture models were tested parallel to the distal joint surface and parallel to the fracture line. The compression load at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm of fracture displacement was assessed. The compression load parallel to the distal joint surface at 3, 4 and 5 mm of fracture displacement was significantly higher in the partial thread screw group than in the TBW group (P<0.01). Additionally, the compression load parallel to the distal joint surface at 4 and 5 mm was significantly higher in the full thread screw group than in the TBW group (P<0.001). However, the TBW group exhibited a higher compression load at 1 mm compared to the full thread group (P<0.05). As regards the compression load parallel to the fracture line, the compression load at 3, 4 and 5 mm of fracture displacement was markedly higher in the partial thread screw group than in the TBW group (P<0.01); likewise, the compression load at 4 and 5 mm of displacement was significantly higher in the full thread screw group than in the TBW group (P<0.001). On the whole, these results strongly suggest that F‑u‑HA/PLLA screw fixation, particularly partial thread screw fixation, has good biomechanical strength and provides adequate stability for the treatment of medial malleolar fractures.

View Figures

View References

1	Lokerman RD, Smeeing DPJ, Hietbrink F, van Heijl M and Houwert RM: Treatment of a Scientifically Neglected Ankle Injury: The Isolated Medial Malleolar Fracture. A Systematic Review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 58:959–968. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	Carter TH, Duckworth AD and White TO: Medial malleolar fractures: Current treatment concepts. Bone Joint J. 101B:512–521. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
3	Yammine K, Karam K and Assi C: Cortical versus cancellous screws in treating medial malleolar fractures: A systematic review of comparative clinical and biomechanical studies. Foot. 40:81–86. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	Barnes H, Cannada LK and Watson JT: A clinical evaluation of alternative fixation techniques for medial malleolus fractures. Injury. 45:1365–1367. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Ebraheim NA, Ludwig T, Weston JT, Carroll T and Liu J: Comparison of surgical techniques of 111 medial malleolar fractures classified by fracture geometry. Foot Ankle Int. 35:471–477. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Brown OL, Dirschl DR and Obremskey WT: Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 15:271–274. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Shikinami Y and Okuno M: Bioresorbable devices made of forged composites of hydroxyapatite (HA) particles and poly-L-lactide (PLLA): Part I. Basic characteristics. Biomaterials. 20:859–877. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Kuroyanagi G, Yoshihara H, Yamamoto N, Suzuki H, Yamada K, Yoshida Y, Otsuka T and Takada N: Treatment of Lateral Tibial Condylar Fractures Using Bioactive, Bioresorbable Forged Composites of Raw Particulate Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-L-Lactide Screws. Orthopedics. 41:e365–e368. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
9	Takada N, Suzuki H, Yamada K and Otsuka T: Treatment of Ankle Fractures Using New High-Strength, Bioactive, Bioresorbable Forged Composites of Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA) Implants. J Orthop. 7(e5)2010.
10	Takada N, Otsuka T, Suzuki H and Yamada K: Pediatric displaced fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus treated using high strength, bioactive, bioresorbable F-u-HA/PLLA pins: A case report of 8 patients with at least 3 years of follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 27:281–284. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	Fowler TT, Pugh KJ, Litsky AS, Taylor BC and French BG: Medial malleolar fractures: A biomechanical study of fixation techniques. Orthopedics. 34:e349–e355. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
12	Downey MW, Kosmopoulos V and Carpenter BB: Fully Threaded Versus Partially Threaded Screws: Determining Shear in Cancellous Bone Fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 54:1021–1024. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
13	Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD and Kellam JF: Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 32 (Suppl 1):S1–S170. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
14	Parker L, Garlick N, McCarthy I, Grechenig S, Grechenig W and Smitham P: Screw fixation of medial malleolar fractures: A cadaveric biomechanical study challenging the current AO philosophy. Bone Joint J. 95-B:1662–1666. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Furukawa T, Matsusue Y, Yasunaga T, Nakagawa Y, Okada Y, Shikinami Y, Okuno M and Nakamura T: Histomorphometric study on high-strength hydroxyapatite/poly(L-lactide) composite rods for internal fixation of bone fractures. J Biomed Mater Res. 50:410–419. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Hasegawa S, Ishii S, Tamura J, Furukawa T, Neo M, Matsusue Y, Shikinami Y, Okuno M and Nakamura T: A 5-7 year in vivo study of high-strength hydroxyapatite/poly(L-lactide) composite rods for the internal fixation of bone fractures. Biomaterials. 27:1327–1332. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	Lind M, Feller J and Webster KE: Tibial bone tunnel widening is reduced by polylactate/hydroxyapatite interference screws compared to metal screws after ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts. Knee. 16:447–451. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
18	Li ZH, Yu AX, Guo XP, Qi BW, Zhou M and Wang WY: Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 5:1531–1537. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
19	Landes C, Ballon A, Ghanaati S, Tran A and Sader R: Treatment of malar and midfacial fractures with osteoconductive forged unsintered hydroxyapatite and poly-L-lactide composite internal fixation devices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 72:1328–1338. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Culemann U, Holstein JH, Köhler D, Tzioupis CC, Pizanis A, Tosounidis G, Burkhardt M and Pohlemann T: Different stabilisation techniques for typical acetabular fractures in the elderly - a biomechanical assessment. Injury. 41:405–410. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar