Open Access

Risk factors associated with the mortality of COVID‑19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • Authors:
    • Junior Carbajal
    • Carlos Ballon‑Salcedo
    • Leonardo J. Uribe‑Cavero
    • Gabriel G. Saravia
    • Sthefany S. Cuadros‑Aguilar
    • Maria J. Lopez
    • Alfredo Rebaza
    • Jhon Ausejo
    • Joseph A. Pinto
    • Kevin J. Paez
    • Luis G. Saravia‑Huarca
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 3, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2024.277
  • Article Number: 62
  • Copyright : © Carbajal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with the in‑hospital mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, a cross‑sectional study of the medical records of patients hospitalized between April, 2020 and February, 2021 was performed. The demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment data were compared between COVID‑19 survivors and non‑survivors. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression and principal component analyses (PCA) were carried out to identify risk factors associated with mortality in these patients. Among the 287 patients included, 132 (46%) did not survive. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that dyspnea [odds ratio (OR), 7.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.77‑40.89; P=0.010], neutrophil count >6.3x109/l (OR, 8.17; 95% CI, 3.16‑26.62; P<0.001), hemoglobin levels of ≤12 g/dl (OR, =3.24; 95% CI, 1.30‑8.56; P=0.014) and a partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) of <60 mmHg (OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 2.83‑21.86; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for in‑hospital mortality. By contrast, lung crackles were associated with lower risk of in‑hospital mortality (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08‑0.55). In addition, PCA revealed that elevated levels of fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and neutrophil count, and a low PaO2/FiO2 ratio considerably contributed to the first principal components of the non‑survivor group. Overall, the results of the present study demonstrated that patients with COVID‑19 and T2DM exhibit a high mortality rate, while several factors in these patients contribute independently to in‑hospital mortality.

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to devastating consequences worldwide. Until the end of October, 2023, >771 million individuals were infected and >6 million succumbed to the disease globally (1). The COVID-19 pandemic had an even more detrimental effect in countries with limited resources. Therefore, Peru was one of the countries with the highest COVID-19-related mortality worldwide, with >220,000 related deaths (2).

The most common risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality include an older age, lower oxygen saturations and the presence of comorbidities, including diabetes. Diabetes is a prevalent comorbidity among patients with COVID-19 and is associated with an increased mortality rate in these patients. More particularly, patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) can have a 2-3-fold higher mortality rate compared with those without the condition (3-5). To date, several factors are known to be associated with worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and type 2 DM (T2DM) (6,7), including angiotensin converting enzyme 2 upregulation, poor glycemic control, higher levels of inflammatory markers, as well as several conditions, such as obesity, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and dyslipidemia (8,9).

Although several studies on the risk factors associated with high mortality rates of patients with COVID-19 and T2DM have been conducted, relevant studies form Latin American countries are lacking. A better understanding of these risk factors in resource-constrained hospitals could be significant for preparedness against global emergencies, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, in the present study, the data from patients with COVID-19 and T2DM hospitalized in the Hospital Regional de Ica, Ica, Peru were collected to explore the clinical features and the risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality.

Patients and methods

Study design and participants

The present cross-sectional study included the medical records of adult patients (≥18 years of age) with T2DM and COVID-19 hospitalized at the Hospital Regional de Ica (Ica, Peru) between April, 2020 and February, 2021. All patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 upon hospital admission based on serological or antigenic tests of nasopharyngeal samples, according to the World Health Organization interim guidelines (10). Patients were diagnosed with T2DM based on their medical records (11) or random serum glucose levels of ≥200 mg/dl (newly diagnosed with T2DM) (12,13). It was mandatory that the medical records of the included patients included information of the analyzed variables, such as demographic, history, clinical, laboratory and treatment data. Pregnant women, and patients with no information about the outcome variable (deceased or discharged) were excluded from the study.

Data collection and variables

The exposure and outcome data for each patient were extracted from their medical records at the time of admission. The data were reviewed by one physician (LGSH) and one researcher (CBS). Disagreements between the two lead reviewers were resolved by a third researcher (JC). The medical records included the following data: The demographic characteristics of the patients, such as age and sex; their medical history, including smoking status, alcoholism, dyslipidemia, obesity, hypertension, cerebrovascular diseases, cancer, HIV, immunosuppressive disease, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hemodialysis and asthma; their vital signs, such as respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); signs and symptoms, including fever, cough, sore throat, general malaise, headache, tachypnea, dyspnea, anosmia, dyspnea, dysgeusia, lung crackles, diarrhea, vomiting, asthenia, abdominal pain, weight loss, polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia and sensory; other laboratory blood findings, such as white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), hemoglobin levels, hematocrit, serum creatinine levels, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, glucose levels, pH, anion Gap, and sodium, potassium, chlorine and calcium levels; and arterial blood gas findings, such as oxygen saturation (SaO2), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), PaO2/FiO2 ratio, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) and bicarbonate (HCO3). These variables and their categorization were considered according to previous studies (6,7). The outcome variable was in-hospital COVID-19-related mortality, which was assessed by the death certificate included in the medical records.

Ethical aspects

Informed consents from patients were not necessary, since the study solely included retrospective data from their clinical records. The personal information of patients was anonymized prior to storage in the local hospital database. The present study was conducted according to the tenet of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by The Research Ethics Committees of the Hospital Regional de Ica (approval no. RD N 561-2021-HRI/DE) and the Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista (approval no. 429-2022-CIEI-UPSJB).

Statistical analysis

Categorical and continuous variables are expressed as frequencies with percentages (n, %) and medians with interquartile range (IQR), respectively. Where appropriate, a Pearson's Chi-squared (χ² test), Fisher's exact or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U tests were employed for the bivariate analysis (survivors vs non-survivors). The risk factors associated with in-hospital COVID-19-related mortality were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, and the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were determined. Self-reported and low-frequency variables and variables without significant differences between groups were excluded from the univariate analysis. To prevent biased estimates caused by overfitting and multicollinearity among predictor variables in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the variables were selected based on scientific evidence, significance from univariate analysis (Wald test <0.05), the stepwise modeling method and checking for collinearity. Therefore, correlation analysis was performed for numerical variables and the Spearman's correlation coefficients (Rho) were estimated. Additionally, the generalized variance inflation factor (GVIF) and adjusted generalized standard error inflation factor (aGSIF) values were determined. Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out to reduce dimensionality and visualize numerical variables (vital signs, laboratory findings and arterial blood gas findings) between the outcome groups. All statistical analyses were performed using R Statistical Software (v4.3.2; R Core Team 2023). The R collection tidyverse v2.0.0 package was used to prepare data (14). Statistical analyses were performed using the gtsummary package v1.7.2(15), while the logistic regression models and PCA were evaluated using the performance package v0.10.8(16) and factoextra package v1.0.7(17), respectively. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference between groups.

Results

Demographic characteristics

In the present study, a total of 287 adult patient with T2DM and COVID-19, who were admitted to the Hospital Regional de Ica, Peru between April, 2020 and February, 2021, were included. Among these patients, 132 (46%) succumbed during hospitalization (Fig. 1). The median age of the patients was 60 years (IQR, 51-68) and 189 (65.9%) were males (Table I).

Table I

Demographics, clinical findings, and sign and symptoms of patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

Table I

Demographics, clinical findings, and sign and symptoms of patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

 Mortality 
CharacteristicAll patients (n=287)aNon-survivors (n=132)Survivors (n=155) P-valueb
Demographics and history    
     Age (years)60.0 (51.0-68.0)64.5 (57.8-73.0)56.0 (47.0-64.5) <0.001
          <61149 (51.9%)47 (35.6%)102 (65.8%) <0.001
          ≥61138 (48.1%)85 (64.4%)53 (34.2%) 
Sex   0.46
     Female98 (34.1%)48 (36.4%)50 (32.3%) 
     Male189 (65.9%)84 (63.6%)105 (67.7%) 
Smoking2 (0.7%)1 (0.8%)1 (0.6%)>0.99
Alcoholism2 (0.7%)1 (0.8%)1 (0.6%)>0.99
Dyslipidemia4 (1.4%)1 (0.8%)3 (1.9%)0.63
Obesity44 (15.3%)15 (11.4%)29 (18.7%)0.085
Hypertension102 (35.5%)59 (44.7%)43 (27.7%)0.003
Cerebrovascular disease4 (1.4%)4 (3.0%)0 (0.0%)0.044
Cancer1 (0.3%)1 (0.8%)0 (0.0%)0.46
HIV1 (0.3%)1 (0.8%)0 (0.0%)0.46
Immunosuppressive disease3 (1.0%)2 (1.5%)1 (0.6%)0.60
CKD10 (3.5%)5 (3.8%)5 (3.2%)>0.99
Hemodialysis5 (1.9%)4 (3.0%)1 (0.8%)0.37
Asthma6 (2.1%)2 (1.5%)4 (2.6%)0.69
Time from illness onset to death or discharge (days)7.0 (5.0, 10.0)7.0 (5.0, 10.0)7.0 (5.0, 10.0)0.23
Signs and symptoms    
     Fever170 (59.2%)88 (66.7%)82 (52.9%)0.018
     Dry cough218 (76.0%)105 (79.5%)113 (72.9%)0.19
     Sore throat92 (32.1%)33 (25.0%)59 (38.1%)0.018
     General malaise206 (71.8%)91 (68.9%)115 (74.2%)0.32
     Headache62 (21.6%)13 (9.8%)49 (31.6%) <0.001
     Tachypnea99 (34.5%)34 (25.8%)65 (41.9%)0.004
     Dyspnea242 (84.3%)122 (92.4%)120 (77.4%) <0.001
     Anosmia16 (5.6%)5 (3.8%)11 (7.1%)0.22
     Dysgeusia13 (4.5%)5 (3.8%)8 (5.2%)0.58
     Lung crackles141 (49.1%)50 (37.9%)91 (58.7%) <0.001
     Diarrhea18 (6.3%)10 (7.6%)8 (5.2%)0.40
     Vomiting17 (5.9%)11 (8.3%)6 (3.9%)0.11
     Asthenia48 (16.7%)14 (10.6%)34 (21.9%)0.010
     Abdominal pain12 (4.2%)4 (3.0%)8 (5.2%)0.37
     Weight loss3 (1.0%)0 (0.0%)3 (1.9%)0.25
     Polyuria12 (4.2%)3 (2.3%)9 (5.8%)0.14
     Polydipsia10 (3.5%)2 (1.5%)8 (5.2%)0.11
     Polyphagia5 (1.7%)1 (0.8%)4 (2.6%)0.38
     Sensory state    <0.001
          Awake250 (91.2%)99 (83.2%)151 (97.4%) 
          Sleepy17 (6.2%)14 (11.8%)3 (1.9%) 
          Drowsy7 (2.6%)6 (5.0%)1 (0.6%) 
Vital signs    
     Respiratory rate (bpm)26.0 (23.0-30.0)28.0 (24.0-32.0)26.0 (22.3-28.0) <0.001
          24-30138 (51.7%)62 (51.2%)76 (52.1%)0.006
          <2470 (26.2%)23 (19.0%)47 (32.2%) 
          >3059 (22.1%)36 (29.8%)23 (15.8%) 
     Heart rate (bpm)100.0 (85.8, 113.0)105.5 (92.0, 115.8)98.0 (82.3, 107.8) <0.001
          <100133 (46.3%)47 (35.6%)86 (55.5%) <0.001
          ≥100154 (53.7%)85 (64.4%)69 (44.5%) 
     SBP (mmHg)115.0 (100.0-130.0)120.0 (100.0-130.0)110.0 (100.0-120.0)0.25
          <140246 (85.7%)104 (78.8%)142 (91.6%)0.002
          ≥14041 (14.3%)28 (21.2%)13 (8.4%) 
     DBP (mmHg)70.0 (60.0-80.0)70.0 (60.0-80.0)70.0 (60.0-80.0)0.13
          <90258 (89.9%)112 (84.8%)146 (94.2%)0.009
          ≥9029 (10.1%)20 (15.2%)9 (5.8%) 

[i] Data are presented as the median (IQR) or n (%).

[ii] aSome variables may not sum to the total number of patients due to missing data.

[iii] bP-values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ² test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; CKD, chronic kidney disease; bpm, beats per minute or breaths per minute; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Comorbidities and symptoms

The most frequent comorbidities identified were hypertension, followed by obesity and CKD. Approximately half of the patients had abnormal respiratory or heart rates, while the majority of them (>80%) displayed normal blood pressure (Table I). Furthermore, the most common symptoms reported upon admission were dyspnea (84.3%), dry cough (76.0%), general malaise (71.8%) and fever (59.2%). The frequency of the remaining symptoms was <50% (Table I).

Blood and biochemical tests

Blood tests revealed leukocytosis in 146 (54.3%) patients, neutrophilia in 196 (68.3%) and lymphopenia in 146 (50.9%) patients. The majority of the patients (92.7%) had a platelet count of >125x109/l, while ~80% of them had normal hemoglobin and hematocrit levels (Table II). In addition, the biochemical tests revealed that the serum creatinine and BUN levels differed significantly between the two groups of patients. Among the 287 patients included, 278 (96.9%) received antibiotics, 232 (80.8%) anticoagulants, 208 (72.5%) corticosteroids, 125 (43.6%) hydroxychloroquine, 115 (44.1%) pronation and 56 (19.5%) ivermectin (Table III). The median time from the onset of illness to either patient discharge or death was 7 days (IQR, 5-10; Table I).

Table II

Laboratory findings of the patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

Table II

Laboratory findings of the patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

CharacteristicAll patients (n=287)aNon-survivors (n=132)Survivors (n=155) P-valueb
Laboratory findings    
     WBC (x109/l)10.6 (7.8-16.6)14.5 (10.0-19.2)9.0 (6.5-13.1) <0.001
          4-10104 (38.7%)29 (24.2%)75 (50.3%) <0.001
          <419 (7.1%)4 (3.3%)15 (10.1%) 
          >10146 (54.3%)87 (72.5%)59 (39.6%) 
     Neutrophils (x109/l)9.0 (6.0-14.8)13.0 (8.8-17.9)7.2 (4.5-11.7) <0.001
          ≤6.391 (31.7%)24 (18.2%)67 (43.2%) <0.001
          >6.3196 (68.3%)108 (81.8%)88 (56.8%) 
     Lymphocytes (x109/l)0.9 (0.6-1.3)0.7 (0.4-1.2)1.0 (0.7-1.5) <0.001
          ≥1141 (49.1%)54 (40.9%)87 (56.1%)0.010
          <1146 (50.9%)78 (59.1%)68 (43.9%) 
     Platelets (x109/l)254.5 (193.5-342.0)251.0 (200.0-331.0)255.0 (190.0-344.0)0.93
          ≥125266 (92.7%)122 (92.4%)144 (92.9%)0.88
          <12521 (7.3%)10 (7.6%)11 (7.1%) 
     MCV (mm3)90.9 (87.7-93.6)91.3 (88.2-94.4)90.2 (87.2-92.8)0.048
     MCH (pg)29.3 (28.1-30.3)29.4 (28.4-30.6)29.2 (27.9-30.1)0.045
     Hemoglobin (g/dl)13.7 (12.0-14.9)13.7 (11.4-14.9)13.7 (12.6-15.0)0.42
          >12216 (75.3%)91 (68.9%)125 (80.6%)0.022
          ≤1271 (24.7%)41 (31.1%)30 (19.4%) 
     Hematocrit (%)42.0 (37.5-46.0)41.7 (35.3-46.0)42.7 (38.5-46.0)0.23
          ≥36229 (79.8%)98 (74.2%)131 (84.5%)0.031
          <3658 (20.2%)34 (25.8%)24 (15.5%) 
     Serum creatinine (mg/dl)0.8 (0.6-1.2)1.0 (0.7-1.5)0.7 (0.6-1.0) <0.001
          <1.3213 (74.2%)86 (65.2%)127 (81.9%) <0.001
          ≥1.374 (25.8%)46 (34.8%)28 (18.1%) 
     BUN (mg/dl)36.1 (26.8-52.0)42.5 (30.0-56.5)32.0 (24.0-44.0) <0.001
          <2030 (10.5%)8 (6.1%)22 (14.2%)0.025
          ≥20257 (89.5%)124 (93.9%)133 (85.8%) 
     Blood glucose (mmol/l)13.26 (9.49-17.15)13.82 (10.84-17.65)12.65 (8.71-16.46)0.18
     pH7.4 (7.4-7.5)7.4 (7.4-7.5)7.4 (7.4-7.5)0.28
          7.35-7.45173 (62.0%)81 (63.3%)92 (60.9%)0.37
          <7.3542 (15.1%)22 (17.2%)20 (13.2%) 
          >7.4564 (22.9%)25 (19.5%)39 (25.8%) 
     Anion gap (mEq/l)10.5 (7.1-14.0)11.4 (7.8-14.4)10.0 (6.4-13.4)0.057
          7-13128 (46.5%)60 (48.0%)68 (45.3%)0.16
          <767 (24.4%)24 (19.2%)43 (28.7%) 
          >1380 (29.1%)41 (32.8%)39 (26.0%) 
     Sodium (mmol/l)137.0 (133.0-142.0)137.0 (133.0-142.0)137.0 (133.5-142.0)0.65
     Potassium (mEq/l)3.8 (3.5-4.2)4.0 (3.5-4.4)3.8 (3.6-4.1)0.057
     Chlorine (mmol/l)1.2 (1.1-1.2)1.2 (1.1-1.2)1.2 (1.1-1.2)0.34
     Calcium (mmol/l)1.2 (1.1-1.2)1.2 (1.1-1.2)1.2 (1.1-1.2)0.34

[i] Data are presented as the median (IQR) or n (%).

[ii] aSome variables may not sum to the total number of patients due to missing data.

[iii] bP-values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ² test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; WBC, white blood cells; MCV, median corpuscular volume; MCH, median corpuscular hemoglobin; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.

Table III

Arterial blood gas findings and treatment of the patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

Table III

Arterial blood gas findings and treatment of the patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

CharacteristicAll patients (n=287)Non-survivors (n=132)Survivors (n=155) P-valuea
Arterial blood gas findings    
     SaO2 (%)90.0 (83.0-94.0)85.0 (78.0-91.3)92.0 (88.0-95.0) <0.001
          ≥9480 (27.9%)28 (21.2%)52 (33.5%)0.020
          <94207 (72.1%)104 (78.8%)103 (66.5%) 
     FiO2 (%)40.0 (21.0-80.0)80.0 (32.0-80.0)38.0 (21.0-40.0) <0.001
          >21 (O2 therapy)203 (70.7%)98 (74.2%)105 (67.7%)0.23
          2184 (29.3%)34 (25.8%)50 (32.3%) 
     PaO2:FiO2 ratio191.0 (95.1-298.0)123.0 (77.6-249.5)238.5 (145.0-325.3) <0.001
          >200135 (47.0%)47 (35.6%)88 (56.8%) <0.001
          ≤200152 (53.0%)85 (64.4%)67 (43.2%) 
     PaO2 (mmHg)73.1 (61.0-91.0)64.9 (52.2-80.5)78.0 (68.0-93.9) <0.001
          ≥60223 (77.7%)82 (62.1%)141 (91.0%) <0.001
          <6064 (22.3%)50 (37.9%)14 (9.0%) 
     PCO2 (mmHg)31.4 (27.9-35.0)30.2 (26.4-35.0)32.2 (28.9-35.0)0.021
          <36222 (77.4%)100 (75.8%)122 (78.7%)0.55
          ≥3665 (22.6%)32 (24.2%)33 (21.3%) 
     HCO3 (mmol/l)20.7 (17.9-23.0)19.9 (16.0-22.5)21.1 (19.7-23.1)0.003
          21-28119 (42.8%)44 (34.4%)75 (50.0%)0.032
          <21148 (53.2%)78 (60.9%)70 (46.7%) 
          >2811 (4.0%)6 (4.7%)5 (3.3%) 
Type of treatment    
     Antibiotics278 (96.9%)132 (100.0%)146 (94.2%)0.004
     Corticosteroids208 (72.5%)111 (84.1%)97 (62.6%) <0.001
     Anticoagulants    <0.001
          No55 (19.2%)14 (10.6%)41 (26.5%) 
          Enoxaparin232 (80.8%)118 (89.4%)114 (73.5%) 
     Antiparasitic   0.085
          No231 (80.5%)112 (84.8%)119 (76.8%) 
          Ivermectin56 (19.5%)20 (15.2%)36 (23.2%) 
     Antimalarials   0.003
          No162 (56.4%)62 (47.0%)100 (64.5%) 
          Hydroxychloroquine125 (43.6%)70 (53.0%)55 (35.5%) 
     Pronation115 (44.1%)54 (40.9%)61 (47.3%)0.30

[i] Data are presented as the median (IQR) or n (%).

[ii] aP-values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ² test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; SaO2, oxygen saturation; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2, partial pressure of oxygen; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; HCO3, bicarbonate.

Differences between groups

Data analysis demonstrated that the non-survivors were significantly older than the survivors (P<0.001). In addition, hypertension (P=0.003), leukocytosis (P<0.001), neutrophilia (P<0.001) and lymphopenia (P=0.010) were significantly more common among the non-survivors compared with the survivors (Table I and II). Furthermore, compared with the survivors, the non-survivors exhibited higher levels of serum creatinine and BUN (both P<0.001; Table II). The median FiO2 value in patients who underwent O2 therapy was higher in the non-survivors than in the survivors (80 vs. 38%), while the opposite was recorded for the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PaO2 and PCO2. In terms of therapy, the administration of anticoagulants, corticosteroids and antimalarials were more common among non-survivors (Table III).

Logistic regression analysis

The univariate logistic regression analysis (unadjusted) revealed that the odds of in-hospital mortality were higher in patients aged >60 years and in those with hypertension, obesity, tachypnea, dyspnea, lung crackles, an increased heart rate, increased SBP, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, anemia and increased serum creatinine, and BUN levels. The decreased levels of gas parameters (SaO2< 94%, PaO2<60, PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤200 and HCO3 < 21) and the administration of corticosteroids were also associated with increased mortality. In the adjusted multivariate regression analysis, a total of 217 patients were included, and in particular, 114 in the survivor group and 103 in the non-survivor group. For this analysis, we excluded highly correlated variables (Rho >0.6) were excluded (Fig. S1). Thus, WBC, diastolic blood pressure, MCV, hematocrit, PaO2, FiO2 and serum creatinine were excluded from the analysis. The analysis revealed that the presence of dyspnea (OR, 7.68; 95% CI, 1.77-40.89; P=0.010), neutrophilia (OR, 8.17; 95% CI, 3.16-23.62; P<0.001), anemia (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.30-8.56; P<0.014) and PaO2 <60 mmHg (OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 2.83-21.86; P<0.001) were associated with increased odds of mortality. By contrast, lung crackles were associated with reduced mortality rates (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08-0.55; P<0.002; Table IV). The aGSIF value of the adjusted model was <1.4, thus indicating that the control for highly associated variables that provided the same information was effective in avoiding collinearity.

Table IV

Mortality risk factors in patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

Table IV

Mortality risk factors in patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.

CharacteristicUnivariate OR (95% CI)P-valueMultivariate OR (95% CI)P-value
Age (years)    
     ≤60- - 
     >602.80 (1.63 to 4.90) <0.0011.71 (0.77 to 3.83)0.188
Sex    
     Female-   
     Male0.79 (0.45 to 1.37)0.394  
Obesity    
     No- - 
     Yes0.40 (0.17 to 0.89)0.0300.38 (0.11 to 1.23)0.114
Hypertension    
     No- - 
     Yes1.83 (1.05 to 3.21)0.0351.37 (0.59 to 3.21)0.471
Fever    
     No-   
     Yes1.63 (0.94 to 2.84)0.082  
Dry cough    
     No-   
     Yes1.39 (0.74 to 2.66)0.305  
Tachypnea    
     No- - 
     Yes0.49 (0.27 to 0.86)0.0151.11 (0.45 to 2.81)0.816
Dyspnea    
     No- - 
     Yes5.59 (2.04 to 19.70) <0.0027.68 (1.77 to 40.89)0.010
Lung crackles    
     No- - 
     Yes0.38 (0.22 to 0.66) <0.0010.21 (0.08 to 0.55) <0.002
Respiratory rate (bpm)    
     24-30-   
     <240.61 (0.31 to 1.19)0.154  
     >301.85 (0.94 to 3.69)0.077  
Heart rate (bpm)    
     <100- - 
     ≥1002.51 (1.45 to 4.39) <0.0012.23 (1.00 to 5.11)0.053
SBP (mmHg)    
     <140- - 
     ≥1402.69 (1.26 to 6.05)0.0121.68 (0.57 to 5.24)0.355
DBP (mmHg)    
     <90-   
     ≥902.44 (1.02 to 6.26)0.051  
WBC (x109/l)    
     4-10-   
     <40.50 (0.11 to 1.69)0.304  
     >104.14 (2.29 to 7.66) <0.001  
Neutrophils (x109/l)    
     ≤6.3- - 
     >6.37.01 (3.43 to 15.60) <0.0018.17 (3.16 to 26.62) <0.001
Lymphocytes (x109/l)    
     ≥1- - 
     <11.71 (1.00 to 2.96)0.0531.87 (0.82 to 4.41)0.143
Platelets (x109/l)    
     ≥125-   
     <1250.85 (0.29 to 2.37)0.757  
MCV (mm3)1.04 (0.99 to 1.10)0.143  
MCH (pg)1.17 (1.02 to 1.34)0.0261.14 (0.94 to 1.39)0.180
Hemoglobin (g/dl)    
     >12- - 
     ≤122.18 (1.17 to 4.83)0.0153.24 (1.30 to 8.56)0.014
Hematocrit (%)    
     ≥36-   
     <362.40 (1.23 to 4.83)0.012  
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)    
     <1.3-   
     ≥1.32.28 (1.23 to 4.31)0.010  
BUN (mg/dl)    
     <20- - 
     ≥203.44 (1.30 to 10.78)0.0200.90 (0.19 to 4.55)0.894
SaO2 (%)    
     ≥94- - 
     <941.95 (1.06 to 3.67)0.0340.80 (0.30 to 2.12)0.661
FiO2 (%)1.02 (1.01 to 1.04) <0.001  
PaO2:FiO2 ratio    
     >200- - 
     ≤2002.14 (1.24 to 3.73)0.0061.34 (0.60 to 3.05)0.474
PaO2 (mmHg)    
     ≥60- - 
     <607.45 (3.62 to 16.70) <0.0017.46 (2.83 to 21.86) <0.001
PaCO2 (mmHg)0.97 (0.93 to 1.01)0.115  
HCO3 (mmol/l)    
     21-28- - 
     <212.10 (1.20 to 3.72)0.0101.49 (0.65 to 3.41)0.346
     >281.72 (0.45 to 6.62)0.4192.25 (0.35 to 13.87)0.376
Corticosteroids    
     No- - 
     Yes2.00 (1.02 to 4.08)0.0491.65 (0.61 to 4.57)0.326
Anticoagulants    
     No-   
     Enoxaparin1.30 (0.56 to 3.16)0.547  
Antiparasitics    
     No    
     Ivermectin0.55 (0.28 to 1.07)0.082  
Antimalarials    
     No-   
     Hydroxychloroquine1.51 (0.88 to 2.59)0.132  
Pronation    
     Yes-   
     No1.35 (0.79 to 2.31)0.277  

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; bpm, beats per minute or breaths per minute; WBC, white blood cells, SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; SaO2, oxygen saturation; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2, partial pressure of oxygen; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; HCO3, bicarbonate.

PCA

The biplots of PCA revealed that the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, BUN levels, hematocrit, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, FiO2, potassium, SaO2, neutrophils and PaO2 were the variables with the highest representation and contribution in PC1 and PC2. In addition, chlorine, calcium, sodium, age, HCO3, WBC, PCO2 and neutrophils were the variables with the highest representation and contribution in PC3 and PC4. PC1 and PC2 contributed to 23.3% of total variance, while PC3 and PC4 to 17.8%. For these principal components, no clear separation between the survivors and non-survivors was observed (Fig. 2). However, based on the results of the bivariate analysis and PCA, in the non-survivor group, the high values of FiO2, BUN, serum creatinine, neutrophils and PaO2/FiO2 ratio considerably contributed to PC1 and PC2 (Fig. 2A), while WBC, neutrophils, age and PCO2 to PC3 and PC4 (Fig. 2B).

Discussion

Once diagnosed with COVID-19, patients with diabetes are more likely to develop severe illness and can be at higher risk of mortality (18). The results of the present study reported a mortality rate of 46%, which was higher compared with that reported in other regions. Additionally, dyspnea, the absence of lung crackles, neutrophilia, anemia and PaO2 of <60 mmHg were identified as significant risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in patients diagnosed with T2DM. Although the PCA results revealed a substantial contribution of multiple numerical variables, neutrophilia remained constant in non-survivors.

The mortality rate in the present study (46%) was among the highest reported in Peruvian populations, which ranged between 33-50% (19-21). A previous meta-analysis, including 42 studies from several regions worldwide, revealed that the prevalence of COVID-19-related mortality ranged from 3.14 (95% CI, 2.34-4.14%) to 61.51% (95% CI, 55.02-67.71%) (18). The mortality rate was higher in Latin American countries. In fact, regionally, Andean Latin America had the highest mortality rate compared with other regions worldwide (22).

Herein, the univariate analysis revealed that an advanced age, hypertension, and obesity were associated with an increased risk of COVID-19-related mortality in patients with T2DM. Consistently, the aforementioned factors have been extensively reported by previous studies as risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality (7,18,23). In hospitals in Peru, an older age, low oxygen saturation and different drugs, such as ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and corticosteroids, were all associated with COVID-19-related mortality. However, the comorbidities were not significant (19,21,24). Another study including patients from three hospitals of Peru, demonstrated that patients aged ≥60 years, those with low oxygen saturation and with two or more comorbidities were at an increased risk of COVID-19-related mortality (25). Similar findings were reported in other populations, including patients with COVID-19, T1DM and T2DM (26). In the present study, an age >60 years, hypertension, and obesity did not reach significance in the multivariate analysis. This finding may be due to the fact that the patients included in the present study were already older when they were diagnosed with T2DM or other diseases. Although herein, hepatic damage was not assessed, previous studies have demonstrated that chronic liver disease and hepatic fibrosis are associated with an increased risk of in-hospital COVID-19-related mortality (27,28).

Dyspnea was the most prevalent symptom in the present study, and it was associated with COVID-19-related mortality in the multivariate regression analysis. Fever, dry cough, fatigue and dyspnea are the most common symptoms of COVID-19 (7,29), with dyspnea being present in most severe cases (29). Furthermore, a previous systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that dyspnea, fatigue, myalgia and a low respiratory rate were the optimal predictors of mortality (7). Other studies have also reported that dyspnea is an independent risk factor associated with COVID-19-associated mortality (30-32). In addition, in patients with diabetes, dyspnea upon admission was associated with a reduced risk of hospital discharge and an increased mortality at day 28(6). Aksel et al (33) demonstrated that dyspnea was an early predictor of mortality in patients with moderate or severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (hazard ratio, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.19-15.28). Lung damage caused by inflammatory responses that compromise gas exchange could explain dyspnea as an early predictor of mortality. The early recognition of this symptom could help to recognize patients who are at high risk.

The utility of vital signs as predictors of COVID-19-related mortality is inconclusive. In the present study, an elevated heart rate (≥100) upon admission was identified as a risk factor associated with an increased mortality. In several studies, an increased heart rate was found to be significantly more common among non-survivors of COVID-19 (34,35). In previous a study including 8,770 patients with COVID-19 from 53 health centers in New York City found that a higher heart rate was associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01), thus suggesting that the higher heart rate and other clinical risk factors could serve as effective predictors of COVID-19-related mortality, regardless of the patient's level of consciousness (34). Notably, a higher heart rate variability could predict improved survival in elderly patients with COVID-19(35).

Furthermore, the results of the present study revealed that neutrophilia and anemia were also independent predictors of COVID-19-related mortality in patients with diabetes. An increased neutrophil count (≥8.0x109/l), hemoglobin levels of <12.5 g/dl, creatinine levels of ≥1.36 mg/dl, an age ≥65 years and CKD have been shown to be associated with the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, invasive mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality (36). Additionally, three previous meta-analyses of early studies revealed that an increased neutrophil count, and decreased lymphocyte and platelet counts could increase the risk of progression and mortality in patients with COVID-19; however, there was high heterogeneity and publication bias (7,37,38). During SARS-CoV-2 infection, neutrophils release a web-like structures to kill viruses. However, neutrophil overactivation and the subsequent enhanced formation of neutrophil extracellular traps can also lead to lung injury and thrombosis (39). Emerging evidence has also indicated that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a known indicator of systemic inflammation, is a valuable prognostic marker in patients with COVID-19 with or without diabetes (40,41). Therefore, a study including 201 patients with COVID-19 and T2DM demonstrated that a NLR of ≥7.36 was an independent predictor of disease severity (42). Although a previous study indicated that renal impairment and respiratory frequency were associated with higher COVID-19-related mortality (43), the results of the present study demonstrated that low CDK frequencies (n=10 patients) and respiratory frequency were significant predictors in the descriptive analysis and PCA, but not in the univariate logistic regression analysis.

Herein, in terms of arterial blood gas parameters, an increased FiO2, and a decreased PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 ratio were associated with COVID-19-related mortality. However, only PaO2 remained significant in the multivariate analysis. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio reflects the level of respiratory failure and it is an oxygenation index commonly used in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (44). Therefore, it is considered as a significant predictor of COVID-19 outcomes (45-47). Previously, two different studies demonstrated that the decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio was an independent risk factor associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 in the ICU (45,46). One of these studies further suggested that a 10% increase in FiO2 at admission was also associated with mortality in patients admitted to the ICU (45). In the present study, the high prevalence (53%) of patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤200) could explain why statistically significance (of of PaO2/FiO2 ratio) was not reached at the multivariate analysis. On the other hand, it has been argued that hypoxemia (SaO2 <90%) is a less useful predictor for mortality in patients with COVID-19, since it could hide hypoxia (48,49). It has been reported that the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SaO2 are good predictors of COVID-19-related mortality. When combined with the 12-field lung ultrasound score, they could be even more useful in predicting mortality and clinical progression of patients with COVID-19(50).

The use of drugs against COVID-19 without sufficient evidence was promoted as a national policy during the so called ‘first wave’ of the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru. Subsequent studies revealed the detrimental effects of this policy. A previous study conducted in hospitals of the Seguro Social de Salud del Perú (EsSalud) revealed no benefits of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin or azithromycin administration in preventing all-cause mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In fact, treatment with hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycin showed an increased risk of all-cause death (51). In a previous phase III clinical trial among Peruvian healthcare workers, hydroxychloroquine was tested as preventive drug against SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, no differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded (52). Furthermore, another study conducted in a Peruvian hospital found that ivermectin and azithromycin were associated with a higher risk of COVID-19-related mortality (19). Herein, the analysis revealed that the drugs administrated were not associated with an increased mortality. In the univariate analysis, only corticosteroids were identified as significant predictors. A study demonstrated that low doses of corticosteroids could be beneficial in patients who were subjected to respiratory support (53). In addition, two observational studies conducted in Perú found that low or low-to-moderate doses of corticosteroids were associated with reduced mortality (19). In patients with or without diabetes, corticosteroids could further lead to severe hyperglycemia, and life-threatening ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (54).

The present study has a cross-sectional design; therefore, it could not examine a cause-effect association between the factors assessed and in-hospital mortality. Additionally, the present study has other limitations. According to the American Diabetes Association, diabetes can be diagnosed based on the random glucose levels in combination with the presence of classic hyperglycemic symptoms/crises. For this subset of patients, herein, the data on hyperglycemic symptoms were lacking. However, it has been suggested that random plasma glucose levels can exhibit a good diagnostic value in predicting diabetes, even when glucose levels are well below the conventional ‘diagnostic’ range (12). Furthermore, the plasma glucose levels were measured upon admission. Therefore, corticosteroids, if administered, could not have any effect on glucose levels. Secondly, working conditions in a pandemic context led to resource constraints and therefore the levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were not measured. The lack of measurements of glycemic control could constrain the findings of the present study, as elevated HbA1c could be associated with worse outcomes and poor immunological response to COVID-19 vaccines (55.) Thirdly, the majority of patients included in the present study were diagnosed with COVID-19 based on serological tests. Fourth, a control group, namely patients without T2DM, was lacking in the present study. Finally, the sample size was not sufficient to draw firm conclusions. Despite these limitations, the present study provided notable findings, while performing mixed statistical analyses (logistic regression and PCA) on patients with T2DM and COVID-19 from Peru. These issues had been poorly reported in Peru.

In conclusion, the present study reported that the risk of mortality was increased in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and T2DM at the Hospital Regional de Ica. Several factors, including dyspnea, neutrophilia, anemia and low PaO2 levels could be independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 and T2DM. Overall, the results of the present study provided data on risk factors associated with COVID-19-related mortality, thus assisting the development of novel treatment strategies for patients with COVID-19 in Peru.

Supplementary Material

Spearman's correlation matrix. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MCV, median corpuscular volume; MCH, median corpuscular hemoglobin; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; SaO2, oxygen saturation; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2, partial pressure of oxygen; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; HCO3, bicarbonate.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Statistics Department of the Hospital Regional de Ica, Ica, Peru, for facilitating the data collection for the present study.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JC was involved in the conceptualization of the study, in the study methodology, validation, investigation and data curation, as well as in the writing of the original draft, and in the writing, reviewing and editing of the manuscript. CBS was involved in the conceptualization of the study, in the study methodology, data validation, formal analysis, investigation, provision of resources, data curation, as well as in the writing of the original draft, and in the writing, reviewing and editing of the manuscript, and in the preparation of the figures. LJUC was involved in the study methodology, data validation, formal analysis, investigation, provision of resources, data curation, and in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript. GGS was involved in the study methodology, data validation, investigation, provision of resources, data curation, and in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript. SSCA was involved in the study methodology, data validation, investigation, provision of resources, data curation, and in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript. MJL was involved in the study methodology, data validation, investigation, provision of resources, data curation, and in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript. AR was involved in the study methodology, data validation, investigation, data curation, and in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript. JA was involved in the conceptualization of the study, in the study methodology, data validation, investigation, provision of resources, data curation, and in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript. JAP was involved in the conceptualization of the study, in the study methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, in the writing, reviewing and editing of the manuscript, in study supervision and in project administration. KJP was involved in the conceptualization of the study, in the study methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript, in the writing, reviewing and editing of the manuscript, in the preparation of the figures, and in project administration. LGSH was involved in the conceptualization of the study, in the study methodology, data validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, in the writing of the original draft of the manuscript, reviewing and editing of the manuscript, in study supervision and in project administration. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. JC and LGSH confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consents from patients were not necessary, since the study solely included retrospective data from their clinical records. The personal information of patients was anonymized prior to storage in the local hospital database. The present study was conducted according to the tenet of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by The Research Ethics Committees of the Hospital Regional de Ica (approval no. RD N 561-2021-HRI/DE) and the Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista (approval no. 429-2022-CIEI-UPSJB).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

World Health Organization: COVID-19 Epidemiological update-27 October 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-epidemiological-update-27-october-2023.

2 

Minsa. Cocid-19 Situation Room. COVID-19 situation. 2022. Available from: https://www.dge.gob.pe/covid19.html.

3 

Huang I, Lim MA and Pranata R: Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia-A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 14:395–403. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Kumar A, Arora A, Sharma P, Anikhindi SA, Bansal N, Singla V, Khare S and Srivastava A: Is diabetes mellitus associated with mortality and severity of COVID-19? A meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 14:535–545. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Guo L, Shi Z, Zhang Y, Wang C, Do Vale Moreira NC, Zuo H and Hussain A: Comorbid diabetes and the risk of disease severity or death among 8807 COVID-19 patients in China: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 166(108346)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Wargny M, Potier L, Gourdy P, Pichelin M, Amadou C, Benhamou PY, Bonnet JB, Bordier L, Bourron O, Chaumeil C, et al: Predictors of hospital discharge and mortality in patients with diabetes and COVID-19: Updated results from the nationwide CORONADO study. Diabetologia. 64:778–794. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Corona G, Pizzocaro A, Vena W, Rastrelli G, Semeraro F, Isidori AM, Pivonello R, Salonia A, Sforza A and Maggi M: Diabetes is most important cause for mortality in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 22:275–296. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to. 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet. 402:203–234. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Lei F, George K and Michael R: Coronavirus spike protein and receptor, illustration. Lancet Respir Med. 8(e21)2019.

10 

World Health Organization: Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases: Interim guidance, 2 March 2020.

11 

ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Gaglia JL, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunt K, et al: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: Standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 47 (Suppl 1):S20–S42. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Rhee MK, Ho YL, Raghavan S, Vassy JL, Cho K, Gagnon D, Staimez LR, Ford CN, Wilson PWF and Phillips LS: Random plasma glucose predicts the diagnosis of diabetes. PLoS One. 14(e0219964)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Association American Diabetes. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 44 (Suppl 1):S15–S33. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, et al: Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 4(1686)2019.

15 

Sjoberg DD, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery JA and Larmarange J: Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary package. R J. 13:570–580. 2021.

16 

Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar M, Patil I, Waggoner P and Makowski D: Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J Open Source Softw. 6(3139)2021.

17 

Kassambara A and Mundt F: factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. Package Version 1.0.7. R Packag version, 2020. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/factoextra/readme/README.html.

18 

Dessie ZG and Zewotir T: Mortality-related risk factors of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies and 423,117 patients. BMC Infect Dis. 21(855)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Soto A, Quiñones-Laveriano DM, Azañero J, Chumpitaz R, Claros J, Salazar L, Rosales O, Nuñez L, Roca D and Alcantara A: Mortality and associated risk factors in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in a Peruvian reference hospital. PLoS One. 17(e0264789)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Mejía F, Medina C, Cornejo E, Morello E, Vásquez S, Alave J, Schwalb A and Málaga G: Oxygen saturation as a predictor of mortality in hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 in a public hospital in Lima, Peru. PLoS One. 15(e0244171)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Hueda-Zavaleta M, Copaja-Corzo C, Bardales-Silva F, Flores-Palacios R, Barreto-Rocchetti L and Benites-Zapata VA: Factors associated with mortality due to COVID-19 in patients from a public hospital in Tacna, Peru. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 38:214–223. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Spanish, English).

22 

COVID-19 Excess Mortality Collaborators. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020-21. Lancet. 399:1513–1536. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, Bacon S, Bates C, Morton CE, Curtis HJ, Mehrkar A, Evans D, Inglesby P, et al: Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 584:430–436. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Anyaypoma-Ocón W, Vásquez SÑ, Bustamante-Chávez HC, Sedano-De La Cruz E, Zavaleta-Gavidia V and Angulo-Bazán Y: Factors associated with covid-19 lethality in a hospital in the cajamarca region in peru. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 38:501–511. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Spanish, English).

25 

Díaz-Vélez C, Urrunaga-Pastor D, Romero-Cerdán A, Peña-Sánchez ER, Mogollon JL, Chafloque JD, Ascoy GC and Benites-Zapata VA: Risk factors for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from three hospitals in Peru: A retrospective cohort study. F1000Res. 10(224)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Holman N, Knighton P, Kar P, O'Keefe J, Curley M, Weaver A, Barron E, Bakhai C, Khunti K, Wareham NJ, et al: Risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England: A population-based cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 8:823–833. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Galiero R, Loffredo G, Simeon V, Caturano A, Vetrano E, Medicamento G, Alfano M, Beccia D, Brin C, Colantuoni S, et al: Impact of liver fibrosis on COVID-19 in-hospital mortality in Southern Italy. PLoS One. 19(e0296495)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Galiero R, Pafundi PC, Simeon V, Rinaldi L, Perrella A, Vetrano E, Caturano A, Alfano M, Beccia D, Nevola R, et al: Impact of chronic liver disease upon admission on COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: Findings from COVOCA study. PLoS One. 15(e0243700)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P and Shi ZL: Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol. 19:141–154. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Muñoz-Rodríguez JR, Gómez-Romero FJ, Pérez-Ortiz JM, López-Juárez P, Santiago JL, Serrano-Oviedo L and Redondo-Calvo FJ: COVID-19 SESCAM Network. Characteristics and risk factors associated with mortality in a multicenter spanish cohort of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Arch Bronconeumol. 57:34–41. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Soares RCM, Mattos LR and Raposo LM: Risk factors for hospitalization and mortality due to COVID-19 in Espírito Santo State, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 103:1184–1190. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Berenguer J, Ryan P, Rodríguez-Baño J, Jarrín I, Carratalà J, Pachón J, Yllescas M and Arriba JR: COVID-19@Spain Study Group; Fundación SEIMC-GESIDA et al. Characteristics and predictors of death among 4035 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 26:1525–1536. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Aksel G, İslam MM, Algın AE, Emre S, Yaşar GB, Ademoğlu E and Dölek ÜC: Early predictors of mortality for moderate to severely ill patients with Covid-19. Am J Emerg Med. 45:290–296. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Rechtman E, Curtin P, Navarro E, Nirenberg S and Horton MK: Vital signs assessed in initial clinical encounters predict COVID-19 mortality in an NYC hospital system. Sci Rep. 10(21545)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Mol MBA, Strous MTA, van Osch FHM, Vogelaar FJ, Barten DG, Farchi M, Foudraine NA and Gidron Y: Heart-rate-variability (HRV), predicts outcomes in COVID-19. PLoS One. 16(e0258841)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Rastad H, Ejtahed HS, Mahdavi-Ghorabi A, Arzaghi M, Safari A, Shahrestanaki E, Rezaei M, Niksima MM, Zakani A, Manshadi SH, et al: Factors associated with the poor outcomes in diabetic patients with COVID-19. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 19:1293–1302. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Shi L and Wang Y, Liang X, Xiao W, Duan G, Yang H and Wang Y: Is neutrophilia associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients? A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Lab Hematol. 42:e244–e247. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Zhang L, Hou J, Ma FZ, Li J, Xue S and Xu ZG: The common risk factors for progression and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. Arch Virol. 166:2071–2087. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Li J, Zhang K, Zhang Y, Gu Z and Huang C: Neutrophils in COVID-19: Recent insights and advances. Virol J. 20(169)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Ali ET, Jabbar AS, Al Ali HS, Hamadi SS, Jabir MS and Albukhaty S: Extensive study on hematological, immunological, inflammatory markers, and biochemical profile to identify the risk factors in COVID-19 patients. Int J Inflam. 2022(5735546)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Chen R, Sang L, Jiang M, Yang Z, Jia N, Fu W, Xie J, Guan W, Liang W, Ni Z, et al: Longitudinal hematologic and immunologic variations associated with the progression of COVID-19 patients in China. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 146:89–100. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Novida H, Soelistyo SA, Cahyani C, Siagian N, Hadi U and Pranoto A: Factors associated with disease severity of COVID-19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biomed Rep. 18(8)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Galiero R, Simeon V, Loffredo G, Caturano A, Rinaldi L, Vetrano E, Medicamento G, Alfano M, Beccia D, Brin C, et al: Association between renal function at admission and COVID-19 in-hospital mortality in Southern Italy: Findings from the prospective multicenter Italian COVOCA study. J Clin Med. 11(6121)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

ARDS Definition Task Force. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L and Slutsky AS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin definition. JAMA. 307:2526–2533. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, Albano G, Antonelli M, Bellani G, Bonanomi E, Cabrini L, Carlesso E, Castelli G, et al: Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 180:1345–1355. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Gu Y, Wang D, Chen C, Lu W, Liu H, Lv T, Song Y and Zhang F: PaO2/FiO2 and IL-6 are risk factors of mortality for intensive care COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep. 11(7334)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Gao J, Zhong L, Wu M, Ji J and Liu Z, Wang C, Xie Q and Liu Z: Risk factors for mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter retrospective case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 21(602)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Tobin MJ, Laghi F and Jubran A: Why COVID-19 silent hypoxemia is baffling to physicians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 202:356–360. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Santus P, Radovanovic D, Saderi L, Marino P, Cogliati C, De Filippis G, Rizzi M, Franceschi E, Pini S, Giuliani F, et al: Severity of respiratory failure at admission and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19: A prospective observational multicentre study. BMJ Open. 10(e043651)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Rinaldi L, Lugarà M, Simeon V, Perrotta F, Romano C, Iadevaia C, Sagnelli C, Monaco L, Altruda C, Fascione MC, et al: Application and internal validation of lung ultrasound score in COVID-19 setting: The ECOVITA observational study. Pulmonology. 17(29)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Soto-Becerra P, Culquichicón C, Hurtado-Roca Y and Araujo-Castillo RV: Real-world effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and ivermectin among hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Results of a target trial emulation using observational data from a nationwide healthcare system in Peru. medRxiv and bioRxiv. 51:191–192. 2020.

52 

Llanos-Cuentas A, Schwalb A, Quintana JL, Delfin B, Alvarez F, Ugarte-Gil C, Gronerth RI, Lucchetti A, Grogl M and Gotuzzo E: Hydroxychloroquine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers: Early termination of a phase 3, randomised, open-label, controlled clinical trial. BMC Res Notes. 16(22)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, Brightling C, Ustianowski A, Elmahi E, et al: Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 384:693–704. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Rayman G, Lumb AN, Kennon B, Cottrell C, Nagi D, Page E, Voigt D, Courtney HC, Atkins H, Higgins K, et al: Dexamethasone therapy in COVID-19 patients: Implications and guidance for the management of blood glucose in people with and without diabetes. Diabet Med. 38(e14378)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Marfella R, D'Onofrio N, Sardu C, Scisciola L, Maggi P, Coppola N, Romano C, Messina V, Turriziani F, Siniscalchi M, et al: Does poor glycaemic control affect the immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccination in patients with type 2 diabetes: The CAVEAT study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 24:160–165. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-December 2024
Volume 6 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 2632-2900
Online ISSN:2632-2919

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Carbajal J, Ballon‑Salcedo C, Uribe‑Cavero LJ, Saravia GG, Cuadros‑Aguilar SS, Lopez MJ, Rebaza A, Ausejo J, Pinto JA, Paez KJ, Paez KJ, et al: Risk factors associated with the mortality of COVID‑19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. World Acad Sci J 6: 62, 2024.
APA
Carbajal, J., Ballon‑Salcedo, C., Uribe‑Cavero, L.J., Saravia, G.G., Cuadros‑Aguilar, S.S., Lopez, M.J. ... Saravia‑Huarca, L.G. (2024). Risk factors associated with the mortality of COVID‑19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. World Academy of Sciences Journal, 6, 62. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2024.277
MLA
Carbajal, J., Ballon‑Salcedo, C., Uribe‑Cavero, L. J., Saravia, G. G., Cuadros‑Aguilar, S. S., Lopez, M. J., Rebaza, A., Ausejo, J., Pinto, J. A., Paez, K. J., Saravia‑Huarca, L. G."Risk factors associated with the mortality of COVID‑19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus". World Academy of Sciences Journal 6.6 (2024): 62.
Chicago
Carbajal, J., Ballon‑Salcedo, C., Uribe‑Cavero, L. J., Saravia, G. G., Cuadros‑Aguilar, S. S., Lopez, M. J., Rebaza, A., Ausejo, J., Pinto, J. A., Paez, K. J., Saravia‑Huarca, L. G."Risk factors associated with the mortality of COVID‑19 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus". World Academy of Sciences Journal 6, no. 6 (2024): 62. https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2024.277