Identification of Pold2 as a novel interaction partner of protein inhibitor of activated STAT2
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 16, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.1065
- Pages: 884-888
Abstract
Introduction
DNA replication is essential not only for duplication of the genome but also for maintenance of genomic integrity during DNA repair (1,2). Chromosomal DNA replication in eukaryotic cells requires three distinct DNA polymerases-α, -δ (Polδ), and -ɛ (1–5). Mammalian Polδ plays a crucial and versatile role in DNA replication and various DNA repair processes (6). Its function as a chromosomal DNA polymerase is dependent on the association with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) which functions as a molecular sliding clamp (7,8). Similar to S. pombe enzyme, the mammalian Polδ consists of four subunits: p125, p50 (also named DNA polymerases δ 2 small subunit, Pold2), p66 and p12, forming a heterotetrameric complex (4,9). It has been reported that Pold2 serves as a scaffold for the assembly of Polδ by interacting simultaneously with all of the other three subunits (10). In addition, Pold2 is also involved in the recruitment of several proteins regulating DNA metabolism, including p21, PDIP1 (polymerase δ-interacting protein 1, PDIP1), PDIP38, PDIP46 and WRN (Werner protein, WRN) (11–14).
PIAS2 [protein inhibitor of activated STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) 2, PIAS2] belongs to the family of PIAS proteins, which includes PIAS1, PIAS2, PIAS3 and PIASy (15–18). PIAS proteins were initially identified as specific cofactors inhibiting DNA binding and transcriptional activation by the STAT family of transcription factors (15). These proteins typically contain an N-terminal SAP domain, an N-terminal PINIT domain, a central RING-like zincfinger (RLD) domain and a C-terminal acidic domain (19,20). The human PIAS2 gene encodes two splice variants, PIASxα (also called ARIP3, androgen receptor-interacting protein 3) and PIASxβ (also known as Miz1, Msx-interacting-zinc finger) (16,21). The mouse PIAS2 gene has at least five isoforms (isoforms 1–5), which differ in the N- and C-termini as a result of alternative splicing. The mouse PIAS2 protein shows 99.4% sequence identity to the human homologue. Although PIAS2 was originally identified as a protein that binds to and inhibits STAT4, the functions of PIAS2 protein are clearly not limited to the regulation of STAT4. PIAS2 is capable of interacting with and modulating (activating and repressing) transcriptional activities of several transcription factors (22–24).
To determine the molecular mechanism of PIAS2 function, we used the yeast two-hybrid screening technique to identify interacting proteins associated with PIAS2. Interestingly, Pold2 was found to interact with PIAS2. Here we report evidence for a direct interaction between Pold2 and PIAS2.
Materials and methods
Yeast two-hybrid analysis
The common cDNA fragment of the mouse PIAS2 gene [9-401 aa corresponding to nucleotides (nt) 213–1391 of NM_008602] was cloned into the pGBKT7 vector containing the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to generate the bait plasmid, pGBKT7-PIAS2. This construct did not show toxic effects or autonomous transcriptional activation following transformation into the yeast strain, Y187. The mouse stem cell cDNA library was constructed in a pGADT7-Rec vector containing a GAL4 activation domain using Matchmaker Library Construction and Screening kits (Clontech, Santa Clara, USA) and then transformed into the yeast AH109 strain. Yeast two-hybrid screening was performed using the Matchmaker Two-Hybrid system (Clontech). Positive clones were selected based on their ability to grow on synthetic dropout (SD) medium/-LTHA/X-α-Gal and for X-α-Gal activity.
Clone isolation and interaction analysis
Plasmid DNA of prey clones was isolated (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and transformed into E. coli DH5α. Prey clones were recovered by ampicillin resistance and cDNA inserts were identified by PCR amplification, sequencing, and BLAST alignment. Interaction between the bait and identified prey clones was verified by co-transforming the purified prey plasmid with the bait pGBKT7-PIAS2 construct into the yeast AH109 strain followed by selection on SD/-LTHA medium. Co-transforming of pGBKT7-p53 with pGADT7-SV40 was used as a positive control. A negative control was also included by co-transforming of pGBKT7-p53 with pGADT7 vector into the same yeast cells.
Expression constructs and antibody preparation
The common cDNA fragment of the mouse PIAS2 gene was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pCMV-Myc and pDsRed-Express-1 vector (Clontech) to generate pCMV-c-Myc-PIAS2 and pDsRed-Express-1-PIAS2 respectively. Full-length Pold2 was cloned into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech) to generate pEGFP-N1-Pold2.
The following commercially available antibodies were used for immunoprecipitation and western blot analysis: monoclonal anti-c-Myc antibody (Millipore Biotechnology, Bedford, MA, USA) and rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (Epitomics, Burlingame, USA).
Cell culture and transfection
HEK 293T and HeLa cells (human epithelial carcinoma line) were cultured and maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Transient transfection of HEK 293T and HeLa cells (75–90% confluence) was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer.
Immunoprecipitations
HEK 293T cells were transiently transfected with pCMV-c-Myc-PIAS2 and pEGFP-N1-Pold2 constructs and maintained as described above for 24 h. The cells were then washed with ice-cold PBS and harvested in 500 ml lysis buffer [150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, and a protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany)]. After incubation in lysis buffer for 60 min on ice, lysates were clarified by centrifugation for 20 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C. Specific monoclonal antibodies (8 μg) were added to the supernatant and incubated for 120 min at 4°C prior to addition of 50 μl protein G-agarose followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C. Samples were then centrifuged for 1 min in a microcentrifuge and washed with 1 ml lysis buffer, 1 ml washing buffer 2 (500 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.05% deoxycholate) and 1 ml washing buffer (10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.05% deoxycholate).
Western blot analysis
Initial lysates and immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting was carried out using specific antibodies. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Amersham, UK) and probed with the appropriate antibodies. Bound antibodies were visualized with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse (Sigma) IgG antibodies using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA).
Fluoresence microscope analysis
To detect PIAS2 and Pold2, HEK 293T/HeLa cells plated on round coverslips were transiently transfected with the pDsRed-Express-1-PIAS2 and pEGFP-N1-Pold2 constructs using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent. After 48 h, cells were washed twice with PBS and visualized by Nikon scanning laser confocal microscope.
Results
Identification of Pold2 as a PIAS2-interacting protein using a yeast two-hybrid screening system
To identify mouse proteins that interact with PIAS2, cDNA libraries derived from mouse stem cells were screened using a yeast two-hybrid system with the bait plasmid pGBKT7-PIAS2. Growth of yeast strain Y187 co-transformed with this construct and the empty prey plasmid pGADT7 was not supported on SD/-LTHA medium confirming that the bait was not auto-activated. A total of 2×106 primary transformants were screened, yielding over 54 positive clones, 10 of which demonstrated strong growth on SD/-LTHA medium. These clones were isolated, sequenced and aligned using the NCBI BLAST alignment search tool. One clone encoded Pold2 (DNA polymerase, δ 2 small subunit), spanning regions of 177 amino acids (Pold2 292-469 aa) was found to interact with PIAS2 protein. To confirm these results, the PIAS2-Pold2 interaction was further investigated using a direct yeast hybrid screening system. The yeast strain co-transformed with pGADT7-Pold2 and pGBKT7 could not grow on SD/-LTHA medium and showed negative β-galactosidase activity (Fig. 1B, clone 3). While strong growth on SD/-LTHA medium was observed only in yeast cells co-transformed with pGBKT7-PIAS2 and pGADT7-Pold2 (Fig. 1B, clone 1), indicating interaction of Pold2 with PIAS2 in yeast.
Pold2 interacts with PIAS2 in vivo
The data obtained from the yeast two-hybrid screen was confirmed by evidence of a direct interaction between PIAS2 and Pold2 in mammalian cells. The expression vectors for c-myc-tagged PIAS2 and GFP-tagged Pold2 were co-transfected to human embryonic kidney 293T cells. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cell extract was prepared, and the proteins in the extract were first immunoprecipitated with the anti-c-myc, anti-GFP and non-specific IgG, respectively. The precipitates were then immnuoblotted against the anti-GFP or anti-c-myc antibodies, respectively (Fig. 2). The anti-c-myc antibody precipitated c-myc-PIAS2. GFP-Pold2, on the other hand, was detected in the immunoprecipitate with the ant-GFP antibody but not with IgG (Fig. 2). PIAS2 protein was also immunoprecipitated from the transfected HEK 293T cells using a rabbit anti-GFP antibody prior to detection of PIAS2 by anti-c-myc antibody. As shown in Fig. 2, Pold2 and PIAS2 fusion proteins were observed in the co-immunoprecipiate and total lysate (input). These results indicated that Pold2 can interact with PIAS2 in mammalian cells.
Co-localization of Pold2 with PIAS2 in HEK 293T and HeLa cells
To further confirm the interaction between Pold2 and PIAS2 proteins, the co-localization was demonstrated by co-transfected pDsRed-Express-1-PIAS2 and pEGFP-N1-Pold2 into HEK 293T and HeLa cells, respectively. Two days after transfection, the cells were detected by a Nikon scanning laser confocal microscope. As shown in Fig. 3, GFP-Pold2 protein was uniformly distributed in HEK 293T and HeLa cells (Fig. 3, green) and DsRed-PIAS2 protein was expressed in these cells (Fig. 3, red). The merged image (Fig. 3, yellow) revealed that Pold2 and PIAS2 were partially co-localized in these cells, indicating that Pold2 can interact with PIAS2 in HEK 293T and HeLa cells.
Discussion
The purpose for this study was to identify novel proteins that interact with mouse PIAS2 using the yeast two-hybrid system. Human PIAS2 include PIASxα and PIASxβ while mouse PIAS2 gene has at least five isoforms (isoforms 1–5), which differ in the N- and C-termini as a result of alternative splicing. So we used the common encoding region of mouse PIAS2 as a bait to screen a mouse cDNA library. As a result, Pold2 protein, a subunit of the DNA polymerase δ complex (10), was found to be a novel interaction partner for PIAS2.
Obviously, protein-protein interactions revealed by the yeast two-hybrid system do not necessarily indicate that the native proteins are capable of interacting, nor do they provide any evidence that such interactions take place in a cellular context. In this study, we have further characterized the interaction of Pold2 with PIAS2.
The ability of Pold2 to interact with PIAS2 was demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation. For this purpose, both tagged forms of Pold2 and PIAS2 eukaryotic expression vectors were co-transfected into human embryonic kidney 293T cells. The whole cell extracts were used for co-immunoprecipitation. The experiments revealed that Pold2 and PIAS2 could be reciprocally co-immunoprecipitated from total cell lysates of the transfected HEK 293T cells. These studies strongly support the view that the interaction of Pold2 with PIAS2 is physiological, i.e. that this interaction takes place in a cellular context.
By using an overexpression system, we further provided evidence of a direct interaction between GFP-Pold2 and DsRed-PIAS2. Microscopy showed that Pold2 protein was distributed in the cytoplasm and nuclei of HEK 293T and HeLa cells, and PIAS2 protein expression was scattered in these cells. The merged image revealed that Pold2 and PIAS2 were partial co-localized in these cells. These results suggested that Pold2 can interact with PIAS2 in mammalian cells.
Mouse Pold2 was cloned from a mouse cDNA embryo library by PCR (25). It was located on chromosome 11, band A2 and encoded a 469 amino acid protein. The homology of the mouse protein with human and bovine homologues was extremely high and the interaction of the 125-kDa subunit and the 50-kDa subunit of Polδ was also highly conserved between mouse and human (25). The crystal structure showed that there are three domains in Pold2: two phosphodiesterase-like (PDE) domains and one oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding (OB) domain. The flanking regions of Pold2 PDE provide a larger surface area and the flexibility to form many protein-protein interactions (26). In our screening, the C-terminal PDE domain of Pold2, which spanned from 292 to 469 amino acids, was found to interact with PIAS2. It has also been reported that there were many proteins interacting with Pold2 protein and fulfilling their function. One of them is p21Cip/WAF1/Sdi1 (p21). p21 was the first cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CKIs) to be identified (27,28). The N-terminal of p21 can bind to and inhibit the cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs) which are necessary for G1 to S phase transition as well as S phase progression (29). A second cyclin binding site has also been identified near the C terminus of p21. The C-terminal region of p21 was also shown to bind proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and to inhibit DNA replication mediated by Polδ (30). p21 was also found to interact with the small subunit of Polδ, Pold2 (11). This ability indicated that p21 may be recruited to the replication complex via an interaction with Pold2. This interaction could provide the basis for the targeting or anchoring of p21 to the replication complex, thereby facilitating the actions of p21. The latter could include several possibilities, i.e., the inhibition of Polδ by binding of p21 to PCNA within the replication complex, or by inhibition of phosphorylation of replication complex proteins by the CDK2/cyclin A kinase (11).
As a member of PIAS2, Miz1 was a mutant PIASxβ with deletion of amino acids 1–133. This mutant protein was initially described as a protein that interacts with the carboxy terminus of the Myc oncoprotein (31). Miz1 was able to activate transcription of genes encoding the cell cycle inhibitors p21, leading to cell cycle arrest (31). Induction of p21 expression required binding of Miz1 to the core p21 promoter and, as a consequence, factors that control Miz1 could affect p21 expression (32). Miz1 could also repress transcription when it formed complexes with other transcription factors. For instance, Miz1 could repress transcription of the p21 gene in a complex with the Myc oncoprotein. Myc repressed transcription of the p21 gene through binding to Miz1. As a result, high levels of Myc suppressed cell cycle arrest and favoured apoptosis in response to DNA damage (32). At its amino-terminus, Miz1 contained a POZ protein-protein interaction domain, which can mediate both homo and heterodimerization among POZ domain proteins. Miz1 heterodimerized with Zbtb4 repressed p21 expression and inhibits cell cycle arrest in response to p53 activation (33). In this study, we found that Pold2 could interact with PIAS2. The yeast-two hybrid bait also contained the full length of Miz1 POZ domain. So there was a possibility that PIAS2 could heterodimerize with Pold2 and regulated the function of p21. The latter could be recruited to the Polδ complex and thereby modulate signaling that could affect Polδ activity. Further study is required to provide more information and evidence for understanding the functional significance of the Pold2-PIAS2 interaction.
In conclusion, evidence was presented here to demonstrate there was a direct interaction between PIAS2 and Pold2, the small subunit of Polδ both in vitro and in vivo. Although its functions were currently unknown, these findings indicated that many proteins might be involved the action of Polδ.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31071020 and no. 81000272) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (no. BK2009192).
