Vitamin D, zinc and glutamine: Synergistic action with OncoTherad immunomodulator in interferon signaling and COVID‑19 (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 4, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2021.4844
- Article Number: 11
-
Copyright: © Name et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
1. Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a novel coronavirus: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (1,2). After the first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in the city of Wuhan, China, in December, 2019, the disease spread rapidly and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 (3). As the COVID-19 outbreak advances worldwide, there is a growing need to identify strategies with which to combat the virus.
Briefly, the cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 occurs after its spike (S) proteins bind to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, which is expressed in several cell types, such as lung alveolar and nasal epithelial cells, enterocytes and vascular endothelial cells (4,5). After binding ACE2, the S proteins are cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 entry-activating proteases from the host cell, including type II transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), exposing fusion peptide domains in a process termed S protein priming. Once membrane fusion occurs, the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome is released into the host cell, triggering viral replication and pathogenic events (4,5).
Some nutrients have the ability to modulate the innate and acquired immune systems, and play important roles in antiviral resistance. The finding of possible synergistic actions between nutrients, as well as between nutrients and drugs, may allow the development of complex formulations that act differently from the individual components. In this context, certain specific nutrients, namely zinc, vitamin D and glutamine have been considered. These nutrients are referenced as potential adjuvants in the prevention and treatment of viral infections (6-9). Moreover, emerging evidence provided in the literature has consistently highlighted the potential role of these nutrients, as well as the immunotherapeutic agent OncoTherad, in the prevention or therapy of COVID-19 (10-27). The combination of these nutrients with OncoTherad aims to provide specific metabolic support that, when coordinated with their individual antiviral effects, may represent a putative therapeutic and/or preventive action against COVID-19.
A common mechanism among these compounds, which already exhibit an important synergy, is their ability to modulate the signaling pathways for interferons (IFNs), which are cytokines recognized for their antiviral properties (8,28-35). This area of metabolic confluence, dependent on these nutrients, also corresponds to a synthetic nanocompound known as OncoTherad, developed as an antineoplastic and immunomodulator used as therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) (36-38). With the objective of designing a joint use, considering a possible enhancement of their efficiencies, the present review article discusses the common properties of these compounds (zinc, vitamin D, glutamine and OncoTherad), considering that when a deficiency occurs, nutrients may become limiting factors of the action of other nutrients and drugs (39).
Toll-like receptor (TLR) and interferon signaling pathways
Once cells are infected by a virus, viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) can be recognized by several intracellular pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), such as TLRs. For example, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9 play important roles in the recognition and detection of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA) specific to the viral genome (40). Some viruses can avoid recognition by TLRs and may be recognized by other intracellular PRRs present in the cytosol (40).
Despite the different types of PRRs that can be activated, the antiviral immune response following the PAMP-PRR interaction involves common signaling pathways. In general, the recognition of viral pathogens is associated with the production of several inflammatory cytokines, in particular IFNs, that have important antiviral and anti-proliferative activity (40).
IFNs are a group of cytokines secreted by infected or immune cells that perform critical functions in the immune system, such as the activation of natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages (40). These cytokines are the first line of defense against viral infections. The binding of IFNs to their cell surface receptors leads to the activation of the Janus-activated kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway, which induces the expression of several genes that fight viral replication in the cell itself and in neighboring cells (28,41). Type I IFNs include IFN-α and IFN-β, while the type II IFN class has IFN-γ as its only member (42). In turn, type III IFN (IFN-λ) is a recently discovered distinct class that, despite activating a complex of different receptors, activates the same JAK/STAT signaling pathway (43).
In addition to the key role in antiviral immune responses, IFNs may also exert anti-inflammatory effects associated with the inhibition of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-18 and IL-12 and/or increasing the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (44-49). Although a rapid and effective immune response is essential to limit viral spread, this antiviral response needs to be controlled to limit tissue damage. It is known that excessively high levels of serum pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (cytokine storm) produce an uncontrolled systemic inflammatory response that contributes to the increased severity of viral infections, such as those caused by SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). This is one of the major mechanisms responsible for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the primary cause of mortality from COVID-19 (49-55). Thus, IFNs can play a role in the treatment of COVID-19, not only through their antiviral activity, but also by counterbalancing the cytokine storm, which is actually observed in acute infection by the influenza A virus (49). Other mechanisms through which these compounds could potentially counteract the cytokine storm, specifically related to their well-known immunomodulatory effects, and other aspects of COVID-19 not covered in the present review are further discussed elsewhere (11,13,15,16,19-21,23,25,26).
Although the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 are not yet well known, its genetic (approximately 79%) and structural similarity with SARS-CoV, as well as the similar pathogenic mechanism of cell entry via interaction with ACE2, and the comparable pattern of mortality by age group suggest that previous findings on SARS may be partially applicable to COVID-19 (56,57). In SARS, there are abnormally low levels of antiviral cytokines, particularly type I IFNs (58). In addition, in severe respiratory diseases caused by the coronavirus subtypes SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, the reaction to viral infections by type I IFNs is suppressed. Both types of coronaviruses use varying strategies to evade the antiviral defense system of IFNs, such as inhibition of the production of type I IFN by infected cells, interference in the IFN signaling pathway and increased resistance to IFNs. These suppression approaches are highly associated with disease severity and an increased mortality (58-60).
In fact, it has been observed that the reduction in IFN-γ expression in CD4+ T cells is related to disease severity in patients with COVID-19 (61). A recent study that used ex vivo human lung tissue samples found that SARS-CoV-2, although replicating and infecting more efficiently than SARS-CoV, did not lead to the expression of type I, II or III IFNs (62).
The use of IFNs for the treatment of viral infectious diseases has been shown to be effective (63). For example, type I IFNs are part of the standard treatment for chronic infections by hepatitis B and C viruses (63). Numerous studies have also reported the success of the direct administration of IFNs against coronavirus (64-72). It has been shown that a combination of type I IFN and IFN-γ synergistically inhibits viral replication in vitro (73-76). Thus, the induction of IFNs has immense potential in the defense of organisms against coronavirus infections. Several clinical trials are currently underway to investigate the efficacy of IFN treatments in patients with COVID-19 (NCT04385095, NCT04350671, NCT04465695, NCT04534673, NCT04480138, NCT04492475, NCT04354259, NC T 0 4 49439 9, NC T 0 4254874, NC T 0 432 4 4 63, NC T 0 4315948, NC T 0 434 4 6 0 0, NC T 0 4276 688, ChiCTR2000029387 and ChiCTR2000029600), including cancer patients (NCT04379518, NCT04534725) (77).
OncoTherad
The synthetic nanocompound, Biological Response Modifier - Inorganic Phosphate Complex 1 (MRB-CFI-1, for its acronym in Portuguese), registered as OncoTherad, is a nanometric compound of metallic salts and phosphate and associated with a glycosidic protein, 420-530 nm in size (36-38,78-80). This novel nano-immunotherapy stimulates the immune system to eliminate cancer and could become a promising strategy against SARS-CoV-2. The immunotherapy drug is being developed by researchers at the University of Campinas in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and has patents deposited in Brazil (no. BR1020170127680) (38), USA (no. US20200156951A1) (80) and Europe (no. WO2018227261) (81). It is being tested in clinical trial (Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry -RBR-6swqd2, UTN U1111-1226-9096) and is still not available on the market.
OncoTherad is a novel intravesical therapy with immunological and antitumor properties for the treatment of NMIBC. The primary treatment for NMIBC is based on surgical transurethral resection followed by intravesical immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) to avoid tumor progression and decrease recurrence. Preclinical, clinical-veterinary and phase I/II clinical trials have shown that nano-immunotherapy with OncoTherad leads to the distinct stimulation of the innate immune system mediated by TLR2 and TLR4, resulting in an increased activation of the IFN signaling pathway [TLR4, TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing IFN-β (TRIF), interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-3, IFN-α and -γ], which is associated to the superior efficacy of this nanocompound in the management of NMIBC compared to the standard treatment with BCG (36-38,82).
More specifically, the OncoTherad-induced stimulation of the immune system via TLR2 and TLR4 occurs through the phosphorylation of hydroxylated amino acids, such as tyrosine, threonine and serine by compounds that contain phosphate salts (36-38,78-80), resulting in the activation of stimulator of interferon genes (STING), with a consequent increase in the production of IFN-α and IFN-γ. The increase in the production of IFNs mediated by TLRs-2 and 4 promotes the activation of TCD8+ cells, dendritic cells and M1 macrophages, culminating in the superior effectiveness of OncoTherad in the therapy of bladder cancer when compared to BCG (37,38,78,80). Experiments with rodents (36,38,80) and dogs (38,79,80) have demonstrated that OncoTherad is able to decrease the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANK-L) system and, as a result, prevent the formation of metastases and/or counteract their progression. In addition, in the treatment of bladder cancer chemically induced in Fisher 344 rats, OncoTherad nano-immunotherapy was shown to increase the immunoreactivities of regulatory proteins, such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and p21, demonstrating the positive contribution of this immunotherapy in the regulation of the cell cycle (80).
A previous study demonstrated that the stimulation of TLR4 resulted in protective immune response and TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM) knockout mice were more susceptible to coronavirus infection and expressed molecular signs similar to those of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV with a poor prognosis (83). Furthermore, SARS-CoV may interfere on IRF-3 signaling, delaying IFN activity (60). Therefore, considering the immunomodulation promoted by OncoTherad and the role of the IFN signaling pathway in the control of COVID-19, this compound emerges as a promising therapeutic option for SARS-CoV-2 infection control and reduction of lung injury severity.
In 5 patients who developed severe COVID-19 while undergoing treatment for NMIBC, the administration of OncoTherad with corticosteroids and antibiotics mitigated the exacerbated inflammatory response in the lungs, decreased the average hospital stay from 18 to 10 days, and prevented the need for intubation (17,84).
A 78-year-old Brazilian male enrolled on the OncoTherad clinical trial (Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry-RBR-6swqd2) for the treatment of BCG-refractory or relapsed NMIBC was the most emblematic case. The patient with a history of former tabagism (34 years), systemic arterial hypertension and previous revascularization of myocardium, arrived at the Hospital Municipal de Paulinia in Brazil, presenting with COVID-19 symptoms (84). He reported a dry cough, inappetence, coryza and malaise, which appeared immediately following a cruise trip. The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed with local RT-PCR, IgM/IgG serological rapid screening and a chest CT scan (84).
Before exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19, the patient was diagnosed with high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. In January, 2020, due to a refractory tumor, the patient was enrolled in the OncoTherad clinical trial, developed at the University of Campinas. Consecutive weekly applications of OncoTherad (one intravesical and one intramuscularly applied per week, for 4 weeks) were used to treat the cancer before the patient interrupted the treatment for 2 weeks for travel purposes. On April 1, 2020, following 24 h of having flu-like symptoms, the patient's clinical condition evolved to fever (38.3°C), headache, dyspnea (pO2, 66.4 mmHg; SatO2, 87%; respiratory frequency, 21 bpm) and basilar crackling and stertors in the lungs. A chest CT scan revealed areas of ground-glass opacities on lung parenchyma with bilateral distribution and predominance on right upper and middle lobes, pointing to an evolving acute lung inflammatory process (84).
OncoTherad immunotherapy was resumed to treat the cancer condition with one intramuscular application. The COVID-19 treatment regimen included oxygen therapy (nasal catheter flux 4 liters/min), Ceftriaxone 2 g (for 6 days, intravenously), Azithromycin 500 mg (for 6 days, intravenously) and Tamiflu 75 mg [twice a day (b.i.d.), for 5 days, orally]. At 72 h following hospitalization, the symptoms of coryza and cough improved, with the absence of fever. However, the patient presented continued inappetence and fatigue on minimal exertions. Oxygen therapy was maintained, and, after 6 days of hospitalization, the patient exhibited a significant improvement in pulmonary inflammation (SatO2, 94% at room air), with the withdrawal of oxygen therapy and significant clinical improvement on the 8th day (pO2, 96.2 mmHg; SatO2, 98%; decreased basilar crackling and stertors in the lungs, absence of fever, attenuated cough and appetite enhancement). The patient was discharged in a good general condition on the 10th day of hospitalization (84). Patient progression and recovery occurred in a shorter time period (10 days) than reported in a previous study (85). As previously demonstrated, 86% of patients enrolled in a Chinese study were discharged after 16 days of hospitalization; the majority of individuals exhibited radiological worsening on the 7th day and improvement on the 14th day (85).
A new chest CT scan was performed on patient discharge and a comparative analysis with the chest CT acquired upon admission revealed areas of periphery pulmonary consolidations and fibrous stripes. Areas of ground-glass opacities were no longer observed. Moreover, treatment-related adverse events were Grade 1 or 2, such as pruritus and rash (84).
In addition, as regards the case report of immunotherapy with OncoTherad, Delafiori et al (84) identified 33 molecules related to the metabolic state at admission and 39 after improvement of the clinical condition and discharge. The authors revealed extensive lipid dysregulation with marked disturbances in the metabolism of glycerophospholipids, glycerolipids, lipid sterols and fatty acids. Several fatty acids species were identified in that study under admission and discharge conditions, including mediators of linoleic and arachidonic acid metabolism, which play a crucial role in the response to inflammation (84).
Notably, the other 4 patients subjected to the clinical protocol of OncoTherad therapy for NMIBC who tested positive for COVID-19 exhibited a similar outcome to that of the patient described in the aforementioned case report. Their recovery was more rapid (10 days) when compared to the observed for patients subjected to the standard treatment only (17).
Considering the comorbidities and age of the patients, it is considered that immunotherapy with OncoTherad exerted a protective effect in this patient, preventing the progression of infection to the most severe states and promoting fast recovery without the need for admission to the intensive care unit (84). A study with 140 participants for the use of OncoTherad immunotherapy associated with standard clinical treatment for COVID-19 is underway at Hospital Municipal de Paulinia. The study is expected to last for 1 year (17).
Studies have indicated that some nutrients, particularly zinc, vitamin D and glutamine, play an important role in the immune system and also modulate the IFN signaling pathway, as described below, which may suggest a possible synergistic action with OncoTherad.
2. Zinc
Several studies have indicated the antiviral activity of zinc against several viruses, such as SARS-CoV, rhinovirus, influenza, herpes virus, respiratory syncytial virus, equine arteritis virus, hepatitis E virus and transmissible gastroenteritis virus (6,86-90). For example, zinc has been shown to inhibit viral RNA polymerase activity in vitro and viral replication in Vero-E6 cells infected with SARS-CoV (89). The antiviral mechanisms of action of zinc include the modulation of the immune system of the infected individual, with increased signaling associated with IFNs. These cytokines also stimulate the influx of zinc into the target cell, which highlights the importance of this element for IFN signaling (6).
Zinc induces the production of IFN-α and IFN-γ, and enhances the antiviral action of IFN-α (29-31). A previous study found that zinc and its transporter, ZIP8 (SLC39A8), regulated the expression of IFN-γ in activated human T lymphocytes, which was confirmed by increased IFN-γ release with ZIP8 overexpression and reduced release of the cytokine with a reduction in the expression (knockout) of this zinc transporter (91). The same study demonstrated an increase in the production of IFN-γ in vitro by activated T lymphocytes isolated from individuals supplemented with 15 mg/day zinc orally and an even greater increase after the treatment of activated T lymphocytes with zinc in vitro (91).
In turn, in human primary lung cells, in the absence of zinc, treatment with IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and the activation of Fas receptor signaling may result in cell death by apoptosis and dysfunction of the pulmonary epithelial barrier, indicating that zinc is a vital factor in the protection of this epithelium against acute damage (92).
STAT1 is a key mediator of the IFN signaling pathway. Reduced zinc bioavailability by the zinc chelating agent, N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine (TPEN), has been shown to significantly reduce the gene expression and protein level of STAT1 in macrophages, which may be associated with increased susceptibility to infections in zinc deficiency (93). By contrast, increased zinc concentrations may restrict the replication of hepatitis E virus, increasing the level and activity of STAT1 and/or inducing the antiviral response mediated by IFN-stimulated genes via a mechanism mediated by the nuclear transcription factor-κB (NF-κB) (90).
Interferon-induced transmembrane proteins (IFITMs) are known for their antiviral functions. They are crucial for the IFN-mediated inhibition of a number of enveloped viruses, including influenza A and Ebola virus (94). Similarly, the zinc metalloprotease, ZMPSTE24, exhibits antiviral activity against several enveloped viruses, including those already mentioned (95,96). Both the IFITM3 and ZMPSTE24 proteins are induced by IFN (90), which in turn is induced by zinc treatment. Given that SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped virus, it is assumed that the increase in IFITM and/or ZMPSTE24 induced by zinc could be effective in exerting antiviral effects against COVID-19.
Zinc also acts as an important mediator of the signaling of several immune cell receptors (97). One of these is the TLR4 receptor, which, similar to other TLR receptors, plays an important role in virus recognition and antiviral immune response (40,97). Upon activation, TLR4 binds to the adaptor protein MyD88 and causes an increase in cytoplasmic levels of free zinc (Zn2+). This zinc signaling is necessary for the activation of MyD88-dependent NF-κB, resulting in the expression of genes targeting this transcription factor, such as the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 (97). These cytokines perform several important functions in the adaptive immune response, contributing to antiviral defense (98).
Clinical studies
A clinical study with 21 healthy elderly individuals in Italy (mean age, 87 years) found that the consumption of zinc-fortified milk (3 mg of added zinc plus 1 mg of zinc naturally present in milk) for 2 months, compared to the consumption of non-fortified milk, increased cellular immunity, which was concluded by the increased release of the cytokines, IFN-γ and IL-12p70, and increased endocrine activity in the thymus (active thymulin, linked to zinc) (99). In that study, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from the elderly individuals who consumed zinc-fortified milk following inflammatory stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exhibited a significant increase of 25.7% in the release of IFN-γ, indicating better cellular immune functioning (99).
These data are in agreement with those of a study on 19 healthy elderly individuals supplemented with 10 mg of elemental zinc (50 mg of zinc aspartate). PBMCs isolated from the elderly individuals and stimulated with SPEA in vitro were evaluated before and after zinc supplementation. Supplementation led to a significant increase in the release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFN-γ (53.28%) and TNF-α (80.03%) (P<0.006), and the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10 (31.79%) (P<0.003). These results indicated that zinc supplementation led to an improvement in the immune response of T lymphocytes (100).
3. Vitamin D
Despite the traditional name, vitamin D is actually a hormone, as in addition to being endogenously produced, it is in involved in the regulation of >200 genes in different cell types (101-103). Vitamin D is converted into its active form (calcitriol) through the action of the enzyme 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1). The detection of the expression of this enzyme and of vitamin D receptors in immune cells and the observation that the expression of these receptors is regulated by immune signaling provide evidence of the central role played by vitamin D in the immune system, as well as the clear association between low serum levels of 25(OH)D3 and autoimmune diseases, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and respiratory infections (40). Respiratory epithelial cells constitutively express CYP27B1, underscoring their local need for active vitamin D (7).
Several studies have suggested an important antiviral role of vitamin D, although the mechanisms are complex and remain poorly understood (7). The activation of TLRs by PAMPs in immune cells leads to the increased expression of the vitamin D receptor and of CYP27B1, increasing the conversion of circulating vitamin D into its active form. Thus, the metabolism of vitamin D in these cells is linked to the recognition of pathogens, rendering it an integral part of the innate immune response (40,104).
For example, the activation of TLR4 by LPS has been shown to lead to the increased expression of CYP27B1 in monocytes (105,106). Similarly, in dendritic cells, the activation of TLR4 or TLR3 induces the expression of CYP27B1, altering the migratory properties of these cells to allow the presentation of antigens to CD4+ T lymphocytes (107-110). In human tracheobronchial epithelial cells, TLR stimulation by poly I:C and live respiratory syncytial virus increases the expression of CYP27B1, resulting in the increased conversion of vitamin D into its active form (calcitriol) and the increased expression of cathelicidins, antimicrobial peptides with important antiviral action (111). Similar effects have been reported for TLR8 and TLR2/1 heterodimer (40).
The cytokines, IFN-γ, IL-13, IL-15, IL-4, IL-1, IL-2 and TNF-α, also regulate the expression of CYP27B1 and vitamin D metabolism. The signaling pathways involved in this process are probably the same as those involved in regulation induced by the activation of TLRs (40,112).
Vitamin D is necessary for the antimicrobial immune response of human macrophages mediated by IFN-γ production against Mycobacterium tuberculosis as this antimicrobial response was not observed with macrophages cultured in human serum of individuals with insufficient levels of this hormone. It has been suggested that increased serum levels of vitamin D may improve the IFN-γ-mediated antimicrobial immune response of human macrophages (32).
In summary, the studies mentioned above indicate that the extrarenal synthesis of calcitriol is regulated by TLR activation and cytokine secretion. Thus, in the presence of sufficient levels of circulating vitamin D, infection by respiratory viruses, which results in recognition by TLRs and cytokine production, is able to increase calcitriol levels, possibly altering the immune response to optimize the fight against these pathogens (40).
Importantly, as previously mentioned, SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 for host cell entry. Given that it acts as the viral receptor, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that the higher expression of ACE2 may be detrimental for the host (113). However, several lines of evidence indicate that ACE2 plays a critical role in counteracting ARDS and acute lung injury (113-116). In fact, the viral binding reduces ACE2 activity, which in turn increases ACE1 activity due to the disruption of the ACE2/ACE1 activity ratio, causing elevated pulmonary vasoconstriction and contributing to the severity of COVID-19 (117,118). Vitamin D has been shown to increase the expression of ACE2 in the lungs, which prevents the pulmonary vasoconstriction response in COVID-19 cases and can reduce lung injury. In this context, targeting ACE2 downregulation with vitamin D in SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a potential therapeutic approach to COVID-19 and induced ARDS (113,117-119). Further studies are warranted to confirm this hypothesis (27).
Clinical studies
Several clinical trials have indicated that vitamin D3 supplementation (1,000 or 2,000 IU/day) is effective for enhancing the efficacy of antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) in patients with hepatitis C (120-123). Conversely, low serum concentrations of the hormone seem to be related to severe hepatic fibrosis and/or to the lower responsiveness to treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV (124,125).
In a study with 50 patients with hepatitis C treated with PEG-IFN/RBV, the authors reported that low serum levels of vitamin D were associated with negative treatment results, while supplementation with this hormone (2,000 IU/day for 24 weeks) significantly improved the viral response, defined as an undetectable serum level of viral RNA 24 weeks following the discontinuation of therapy (122). These results were later corroborated by a clinical trial with 84 patients with hepatitis C that also concluded that vitamin D supplementation (1,000 IU/day) from the eighth week until the end of treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV may increase the effects of antiviral therapy (123).
4. Glutamine
Glutamine is an amino acid used as a nitrogen source for rapidly-dividing cells, such as lymphocytes, in which it is critical for nucleotide synthesis and energy production (126).
T lymphocytes are activated rapidly following their interaction with pathogens, which requires high energy and biosynthetic demands (35). These augmented metabolic needs are met by increased absorption and use of glutamine, which is essential for the proliferation of these immune cells (33,35,127). In fact, the activation of naive T lymphocytes is associated with the rapid glutamine uptake, which requires the amino acid transporter ASCT2 (128). Glutamine transporters are upregulated during the activation of T lymphocytes, while a reduction in these transporters impairs the function of these immune cells (33,129).
Activated human T lymphocytes also require glutamine for the production of IFN-γ and IL-2. This compound modulates not only the proliferation of stimulated PBMCs, but also the secretion of these cytokines in a concentration-dependent manner (130), and glutamine depletion inhibits T lymphocyte proliferation, and decreases IL-2 and IFN-γ production (33,34).
When a naive CD4+ T cell is activated by antigens, the types of cytokines determine whether this cell will differentiate into an effector T lymphocyte that performs an immune response, such as a helper T helper 1 cell (Th1) or a regulatory T lymphocyte, which suppresses immune responses. Even in the presence of cytokines that normally promote the generation of Th1 cells, glutamine depletion favors the regulatory T phenotype rather than the Th1 phenotype, which is associated with the suspension of IFN-γ secretion (35). Thus, reduced glutamine availability alters the balance of the immune response to become more suppressive (35), which could impair antiviral immune responses.
Studies have demonstrated that glutamine has antiviral activity against the herpes virus (8,9). Following infection with the herpes simplex virus, glutamine-treated mice (intraperitoneal injection of 8 mg of glutamine twice daily) were shown to have lower levels of virus, higher numbers of active CD4 and CD8 cells in the spleen, and increased levels of IFN-γ in vaginal fluid at 2 and 4 days post-infection, which was associated with an improvement in the clinical signs of viral infection (8). By contrast, glutamine depletion increased the replication of herpes virus (ICP0-null mutant) in cell culture in vitro (9).
A recent study used advanced bioinformatics to identify existing therapeutic options for patients with COVID-19 (131). Two computational approaches were used to identify therapeutic agents already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that could prevent SARS-CoV-2 from entering cells via ACE2 or TMPRSS2 enzymes and that could mitigate the gene expression patterns stimulated by coronavirus. Glutathione and its precursor glutamine were ranked high by two different methods, suggesting that both justify further investigation of their potential effects against SARS-CoV-2 (131).
Clinical studies
Low plasma glutamine levels are associated with a poor clinical outcome in intensive care unit patients (132). Following trauma and surgery, there is a marked reduction in plasma and muscle glutamine concentrations and excessive differentiation of T cells towards a type 2 response. These changes contribute to the state of immunosuppression and greater susceptibility to infectious complications, such as pneumonia, sepsis and bacteremia. It has been observed that the administration of enteral nutrition enriched with glutamine in patients with severe trauma increases the plasma concentrations of the amino acid and reduces the incidence of infectious complications, in addition to improving a variety of immunological parameters (133-138).
A clinical study investigated the effects of enteral nutrition enriched with glutamine compared to a control isocaloric enteral diet on the responses of T lymphocytes during the first 2 weeks after severe traumatic injuries in 28 patients (injury severity score >20) (138). A total of 17 healthy volunteers were used as controls. On the first day, it was observed that T lymphocytes isolated from trauma patients, compared to healthy individuals, exhibited a low IFN-γ production following stimulation with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) in vitro. After 2 weeks, glutamine nutrition significantly augmented the production of IFN-γ, in addition to preventing the decrease in IL-4 production by T lymphocytes stimulated in vitro. In conclusion, trauma caused the suppression of the cellular immune response, while glutamine supported the restoration of the lymphocyte response capacity by increasing IFN-γ production and maintaining normal IL-4 production (138).
Finally, a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of 57 clinical trials evaluated the effect of glutamine supplementation in a total of 4,671 adult patients with serious diseases or undergoing major surgery. The results revealed that the risk of infectious complications in subjects who received glutamine was 21% lower (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.87; P<0.00001) than that in patients who did not receive glutamine. In addition, glutamine supplementation reduced the mean duration of hospitalization and the mean duration of mechanical ventilation by 3.46 (95% CI, -4.61 to -2.32; P<0.0001) and 0.69 (95% CI, -1.37 to -0.02; P=0.04) days, respectively (139).
5. Conclusion
With the advancement of the COVID-19 outbreak, there is an urgent need for the identificsation of strategies with which to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immunotherapy with OncoTherad has been found to be safe and effective in the treatment of NMIBC by increasing the signaling associated with IFNs, cytokines that play essential functions in the activation of the immune system and antiviral responses. Taken together, the available evidence indicates that zinc, vitamin D and glutamine are essential in antiviral defenses, with an emphasis on the participation of these nutrients in IFN signaling, suggesting an adjuvant and synergistic therapeutic potential with OncoTherad in modulating immune function in the treatment of COVID-19 (Fig. 1). Thus, the possible beneficial role in this viral infection justifies the need for preclinical and clinical studies to evaluate the combination of these compounds and standardize the dosages that could provide greater benefits to patients.
Funding
The present study was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) (313152/2018-7) to WJF.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
JJN contributed to the study concept and critically reviewed the article. ARV contributed to the design of the manuscript and figure preparation and edition. JJN, ARV, ACRS and WJF contributed to literature review and drafted the manuscript. All authors gave the final approval for all aspects of the work, agree to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Ms. Paula Mitie Hirata from Kilyos Nutrition for providing technical assistance with the editing of the figure.
References
Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, et al: A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 579:270–273. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, Haagmans BL, Lauber CL, Leontovich AM, Neuman BW, et al: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: The species and its viruses- A statement of the Coronavirus Study Group. Microbiology. 2020. | |
Cucinotta D and Vanelli M: WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 91:157–160. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A and Li F: Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 117:11727–11734. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nitulescu GM, Paunescu H, Moschos SA, Petrakis D, Nitulescu G, Ion GND, Spandidos DA, Nikolouzakis TK, Drakoulis N and Tsatsakis A: Comprehensive analysis of drugs to treat SARSCoV2 infection: Mechanistic insights into current COVID19 therapies (Review). Int J Mol Med. 46:467–488. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Read SA, Obeid S, Ahlenstiel C and Ahlenstiel G: The role of zinc in antiviral immunity. Adv Nutr. 10:696–710. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Teymoori-Rad M, Shokri F, Salimi V and Marashi SM: The interplay between vitamin D and viral infections. Rev Med Virol. 29:e20322019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Uyangaa E, Lee HK and Eo SK: Glutamine and leucine provide enhanced protective immunity against mucosal infection with herpes simplex virus type 1. Immune Netw. 12:196–206. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bringhurst RM, Dominguez AA and Schaffer PA: Glutamine deprivation causes enhanced plating efficiency of a herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP0-null mutant. J Virol. 82:11472–11475. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arvinte C, Singh M and Marik PE: Serum levels of vitamin C and vitamin D in a cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients of a North American Community Hospital Intensive Care Unit in May 2020: A pilot study. Med Drug Discov. 8:1000642020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alexander J, Tinkov A, Strand TA, Alehagen U, Skalny A and Aaseth J: Early nutritional interventions with zinc, selenium and vitamin D for raising anti-viral resistance against progressive COVID-19. Nutrients. 12:23582020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Bauer SR, Kapoor A, Rath M and Thomas SA: What is the role of supplementation with ascorbic acid, zinc, vitamin D, or N-acetylcysteine for prevention or treatment of COVID-19? Cleve Clin J Med. Jun 8–2020.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Benskin LL: A basic review of the preliminary evidence that COVID-19 risk and severity is increased in vitamin D deficiency. Front Public Health. 8:5132020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brewer J, Gomez Marti JL and Brufsky A: Potential interventions for SARS-CoV-2 infections: Zinc showing promise. J Med Virol. Sep 17–2020.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Calder PC, Carr AC, Gombart AF and Eggersdorfer M: Optimal nutritional status for a well-functioning immune system is an important factor to protect against viral infections. Nutrients. 12:11812020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Chakhtoura M, Napoli N and El Hajj Fuleihan G: Commentary: Myths and facts on vitamin D amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Metabolism. 109:1542762020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Durán N and Fávaro WJ: Immunomodulators acting on covid-19: Actual knowledge and perspectives. J Appl Microb Res. 3:37–44. 2020. | |
Ebadi M and Montano-Loza AJ: Perspective: Improving vitamin D status in the management of COVID-19. Eur J Clin Nutr. 74:856–859. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara F, De Rosa F and Vitiello A: The central role of clinical nutrition in COVID-19 patients during and after hospitalization in intensive care unit. SN Compr Clin Med. 1–5. 2020. | |
Grant WB, Lahore H, McDonnell SL, Baggerly CA, French CB, Aliano JL and Bhattoa HP: Evidence that vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients. 12:9882020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Jovic TH, Ali SR, Ibrahim N, Jessop ZM, Tarassoli SP, Dobbs TD, Holford P, Thornton CA and Whitaker IS: Could vitamins help in the fight against COVID-19? Nutrients. 12:25502020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Siuka D, Pfeifer M and Pinter B: Vitamin D supplementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc. 95:1804–1805. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Skalny AV, Rink L, Ajsuvakova OP, Aschner M, Gritsenko VA, Alekseenko SI, Svistunov AA, Petrakis D, Spandidos DA, Aaseth J, et al: Zinc and respiratory tract infections: Perspectives for COVID19 (Review). Int J Mol Med. 46:17–26. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu Y, Baylink DJ, Chen CS, Reeves ME, Xiao J, Lacy C, Lau E and Cao H: The importance of vitamin d metabolism as a potential prophylactic, immunoregulatory and neuroprotective treatment for COVID-19. J Transl Med. 18:3222020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weir EK, Thenappan T, Bhargava M and Chen Y: Does vitamin D deficiency increase the severity of COVID-19? Clin Med (Lond). 20:e107–e108. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang J, McCullough PA and Tecson KM: Vitamin D deficiency in association with endothelial dysfunction: Implications for patients with COVID-19. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 21:339–344. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bergman P: The link between vitamin D and COVID-19: Distinguishing facts from fiction. J Intern Med. Jul 11–2020.Epub ahead of print. | |
Totura AL and Bavari S: Broad-spectrum coronavirus antiviral drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 14:397–412. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berg K, Bolt G, Andersen H and Owen TC: Zinc potentiates the antiviral action of human IFN-alpha tenfold. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 21:471–474. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Foster M and Samman S: Zinc and regulation of inflammatory cytokines: Implications for cardiometabolic disease. Nutrients. 4:676–694. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cakman I, Kirchner H and Rink L: Zinc supplementation reconstitutes the production of interferon-alpha by leukocytes from elderly persons. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 17:469–472. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fabri M, Stenger S, Shin DM, Yuk JM, Liu PT, Realegeno S, Lee HM, Krutzik SR, Schenk M, Sieling PA, et al: Vitamin D is required for IFN-gamma-mediated antimicrobial activity of human macrophages. Sci Transl Med. 3:104ra1022011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carr EL, Kelman A, Wu GS, Gopaul R, Senkevitch E, Aghvanyan A, Turay AM and Frauwirth KA: Glutamine uptake and metabolism are coordinately regulated by ERK/MAPK during T lymphocyte activation. J Immunol. 185:1037–1044. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hörig H, Spagnoli GC, Filgueira L, Babst R, Gallati H, Harder F, Juretic A and Heberer M: Exogenous glutamine requirement is confined to late events of T cell activation. J Cell Biochem. 53:343–351. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klysz D, Tai X, Robert PA, Craveiro M, Cretenet G, Oburoglu L, Mongellaz C, Floess S, Fritz V, Matias MI, et al: Glutamine-dependent alpha-ketoglutarate production regulates the balance between T helper 1 cell and regulatory T cell generation. Sci Signal. 8:ra972015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fávaro WJ, Iantas SR, Gonçalves JM, Dias QC, Reis IB, Billis A, Duran N and Alonso JC: Role of OncoTherad immunotherapy in the regulation of toll-like receptors-mediated immune system and RANK/RANKL signaling: New therapeutic perspective for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 37:e160042019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Durán N, Dias QC and Fávaro WJ: OncoTherad: A new nanobiological response modifier, its toxicological and anticancer activities. J Phys Conf Ser. Oct 2–2019.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fávaro W and Durán N: Process of obtaining a nanostructured complex (CFI-1), associated to nanostructured CFI-1 with a protein (MRB-CFI-1) and its use. Patent BR1020170127680. June 14–2017 | |
Challem JJ: Toward a new definition of essential nutrients: Is it now time for a third 'vitamin' paradigm? Med Hypotheses. 52:417–422. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Greiller CL and Martineau AR: Modulation of the immune response to respiratory viruses by vitamin D. Nutrients. 7:4240–4270. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Platanias LC: Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 5:375–386. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Le Page C, Génin P, Baines MG and Hiscott J: Interferon activation and innate immunity. Rev Immunogenet. 2:374–386. 2000. | |
O'Brien TR, Thomas DL, Jackson SS, Prokunina-Olsson L, Donnelly RP and Hartmann R: Weak induction of interferon expression by SARS-CoV-2 supports clinical trials of interferon lambda to treat early COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 71:1410–1412. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Benveniste EN and Qin H: Type I interferons as anti-inflammatory mediators. Sci STKE. 2007:pe702007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Karimi Y, Giles EC, Vahedi F, Chew MV, Nham T, Loukov D, Lee AJ, Bowdish DM and Ashkar AA: IFN-beta signalling regulates RAW 264.7 macrophage activation, cytokine production, and killing activity. Innate Immun. 26:172–182. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Billiau A: Anti-inflammatory properties of Type I interferons. Antiviral Res. 71:108–116. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
González-Navajas JM, Lee J, David M and Raz E: Immunomodulatory functions of type I interferons. Nat Rev Immunol. 12:125–135. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guarda G, Braun M, Staehli F, Tardivel A, Mattmann C, Förster I, Farlik M, Decker T, Du Pasquier RA, Romero P and Tschopp J: Type I interferon inhibits interleukin-1 production and inflammasome activation. Immunity. 34:213–223. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arimori Y, Nakamura R, Yamada H, Shibata K, Maeda N, Kase T and Yoshikai Y: Type I interferon limits influenza virus-induced acute lung injury by regulation of excessive inflammation in mice. Antiviral Res. 99:230–237. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Doherty PC, Turner SJ, Webby RG and Thomas PG: Influenza and the challenge for immunology. Nat Immunol. 7:449–455. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maines TR, Szretter KJ, Perrone L, Belser JA, Bright RA, Zeng H, Tumpey TM and Katz JM: Pathogenesis of emerging avian influenza viruses in mammals and the host innate immune response. Immunol Rev. 225:68–84. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Taubenberger JK and Morens DM: The pathology of influenza virus infections. Annu Rev Pathol. 3:499–522. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Li X, Geng M, Peng Y, Meng L and Lu S: Molecular immune pathogenesis and diagnosis of COVID-19. J Pharm Anal. 10:102–108. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, et al: Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 395:497–506. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Huang L, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao P, Liu H, Zhu L, et al: Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 8:420–422. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gralinski LE and Menachery VD: Return of the coronavirus: 2019-nCoV. Viruses. 12:1352020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Xu J, Zhao S, Teng T, Abdalla AE, Zhu W, Xie L, Wang Y and Guo X: Systematic comparison of two animal-to-human transmitted human coronaviruses: SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Viruses. 12:2442020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Sarzi-Puttini P, Giorgi V, Sirotti S, Marotto D, Ardizzone S, Rizzardini G, Antinori S and Galli M: COVID-19, cytokines and immunosuppression: What can we learn from severe acute respiratory syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 38:337–342. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kindler E, Thiel V and Weber F: Interaction of SARS and MERS coronaviruses with the antiviral interferon response. Adv Virus Res. 96:219–243. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Perlman S and Dandekar AA: Immunopathogenesis of coronavirus infections: Implications for SARS. Nat Rev Immunol. 5:917–927. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pedersen SF and Ho YC: SARS-CoV-2: A storm is raging. J Clin Invest. 130:2202–2205. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chu H, Chan JF, Wang Y, Yuen TT, Chai Y, Hou Y, Shuai H, Yang D, Hu B, Huang X, et al: Comparative replication and immune activation profiles of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV in human lungs: An ex vivo study with implications for the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 71:1400–1409. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li SF, Gong MJ, Zhao FR, Shao JJ, Xie YL, Zhang YG and Chang HY: Type I interferons: Distinct biological activities and current applications for viral infection. Cell Physiol Biochem. 51:2377–2396. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haagmans BL, Kuiken T, Martina BE, Fouchier RA, Rimmelzwaan GF, van Amerongen G, van Riel D, de Jong T, Itamura S, Chan KH, et al: Pegylated interferon-alpha protects type 1 pneumocytes against SARS coronavirus infection in macaques. Nat Med. 10:290–293. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cinatl J, Morgenstern B, Bauer G, Chandra P, Rabenau H and Doerr HW: Treatment of SARS with human interferons. Lancet. 362:293–294. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Falzarano D, de Wit E, Rasmussen AL, Feldmann F, Okumura A, Scott DP, Brining D, Bushmaker T, Martellaro C, Baseler L, et al: Treatment with interferon-α2b and ribavirin improves outcome in MERS-CoV-infected rhesus macaques. Nat Med. 19:1313–1317. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ströher U, DiCaro A, Li Y, Strong JE, Aoki F, Plummer F, Jones SM and Feldmann H: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus is inhibited by interferon-alpha. J Infect Dis. 189:1164–1167. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Channappanavar R, Fehr AR, Zheng J, Wohlford-Lenane C, Abrahante JE, Mack M, Sompallae R, McCray PB Jr, Meyerholz DK and Perlman S: IFN-I response timing relative to virus replication determines MERS coronavirus infection outcomes. J Clin Invest. 130:3625–3639. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hensley LE, Fritz LE, Jahrling PB, Karp CL, Huggins JW and Geisbert TW: Interferon-beta 1a and SARS coronavirus replication. Emerg Infect Dis. 10:317–319. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Turner RB, Felton A, Kosak K, Kelsey DK and Meschievitz CK: Prevention of experimental coronavirus colds with intranasal alpha-2b interferon. J Infect Dis. 154:443–447. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Falzarano D, de Wit E, Martellaro C, Callison J, Munster VJ and Feldmann H: Inhibition of novel beta coronavirus replication by a combination of interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin. Sci Rep. 3:16862013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Thiel V and Weber F: Interferon and cytokine responses to SARS-coronavirus infection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 19:121–132. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sainz B Jr, Mossel EC, Peters CJ and Garry RF: Interferon-beta and interferon-gamma synergistically inhibit the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Virology. 329:11–17. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mossel EC, Sainz B Jr, Garry RF and Peters CJ: Synergistic inhibition of SARS-coronavirus replication by type I and type II IFN. Adv Exp Med Biol. 581:503–506. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshikawa T, Hill TE, Yoshikawa N, Popov VL, Galindo CL, Garner HR, Peters CJ and Tseng CT: Dynamic innate immune responses of human bronchial epithelial cells to severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus infection. PLoS One. 5:e87292010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Larkin J, Jin L, Farmen M, Venable D, Huang Y, Tan SL and Glass JI: Synergistic antiviral activity of human interferon combinations in the hepatitis C virus replicon system. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 23:247–257. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li G and De Clercq E: Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Nat Rev Drug Discov. 19:149–150. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fávaro WJ, Iantas SR, Gonçalves JM, Socca EAR, Durán N and Billis A: Single-arm phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of OncoTherad immunomodulator in patients BCG-refractory or relapsed non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 37:e160002019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Böckelmann PK, Tizziani SH, Durán N and Fávaro WJ: New therapeutic perspective for bladder cancer in dogs: Toxicological and clinical effects of oncotherad nanostructured immunotherapy. J Phys Conf Ser. 1323:0120222019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fávaro WJ and Caballero NE: A method for producing a nanostructured complex (cfi-1), a protein-associated nanostructured complex (mrb-cfi-1) and use. US Patent 20200156951. June 14–2018, issued May 21, 2020. | |
Fávaro WJ and Caballero NED: A method for producing a nanostructured complex (cfi-1), a protein-associated nanostructured complex (mrb-cfi-1) And use. Patent WO2018227261. Filed June 13, 2018; issued December 19, 2018. | |
Alonso JCC, Reis IB, Gonçalves JM, Sasaki BR, Cintra AA, Duran N, Billis A and Fávaro WJ: Oncotherad immunotherapy elicits promising responses in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Results from phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol. 38:e170482020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Totura AL, Whitmore A, Agnihothram S, Schäfer A, Katze MG, Heise MT and Baric RS: Toll-like receptor 3 signaling via TRIF contributes to a protective innate immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. mBio. 6:e00638–00615. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Delafiori J, Alonso JCC, Santos LA, Oliveira DN, Navarro LC, Brandt Busanello EN, Sales GM, Oliveira AN, Rocha AR, Durán N, et al: A 78-year old urothelial cancer patient with faster recovery from COVID-19: Potential benefit from adjuvant active immunotherapy. SSRN. Jun 4–2020.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen J, Qi T, Liu L, Ling Y, Qian Z, Li T, Li F, Xu Q, Zhang Y, Xu S, et al: Clinical progression of patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China. J Infect. 80:e1–e6. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei Z, Burwinkel M, Palissa C, Ephraim E and Schmidt MF: Antiviral activity of zinc salts against transmissible gastroenteritis virus in vitro. Vet Microbiol. 160:468–472. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Korant BD, Kauer JC and Butterworth BE: Zinc ions inhibit replication of rhinoviruses. Nature. 248:588–590. 1974. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suara RO and Crowe JE Jr: Effect of zinc salts on respiratory syncytial virus replication. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 48:783–790. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
te Velthuis AJ, van den Worm SH, Sims AC, Baric RS, Snijder EJ and van Hemert MJ: Zn(2+) inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity in vitro and zinc ionophores block the replication of these viruses in cell culture. PLoS Pathog. 6:e10011762010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaushik N, Anang S, Ganti KP and Surjit M: Zinc: A potential antiviral against Hepatitis E virus infection? DNA Cell Biol. 37:593–599. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aydemir TB, Liuzzi JP, McClellan S and Cousins RJ: Zinc transporter ZIP8 (SLC39A8) and zinc influence IFN-gamma expression in activated human T cells. J Leukoc Biol. 86:337–348. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bao S and Knoell DL: Zinc modulates cytokine-induced lung epithelial cell barrier permeability. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 291:L1132–L1141. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reiber C, Brieger A, Engelhardt G, Hebel S, Rink L and Haase H: Zinc chelation decreases IFN-β-induced STAT1 upregulation and iNOS expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 44:76–82. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang IC, Bailey CC, Weyer JL, Radoshitzky SR, Becker MM, Chiang JJ, Brass AL, Ahmed AA, Chi X, Dong L, et al: Distinct patterns of IFITM-mediated restriction of filoviruses, SARS coronavirus, and influenza A virus. PLoS Pathog. 7:e10012582011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fu B, Wang L, Li S and Dorf ME: ZMPSTE24 defends against influenza and other pathogenic viruses. J Exp Med. 214:919–929. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li S, Fu B, Wang L and Dorf ME: ZMPSTE24 is downstream effector of interferon-induced transmembrane antiviral activity. DNA Cell Biol. 36:513–517. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brieger A, Rink L and Haase H: Differential regulation of TLR-dependent MyD88 and TRIF signaling pathways by free zinc ions. J Immunol. 191:1808–1817. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Newton K and Dixit VM: Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 4:a0060492012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Costarelli L, Giacconi R, Malavolta M, Basso A, Piacenza F, DeMartiis M, Giannandrea E, Renieri C, Busco F, Galeazzi R and Mocchegiani E: Effects of zinc-fortified drinking skim milk (as functional food) on cytokine release and thymic hormone activity in very old persons: A pilot study. Age (Dordr). 36:96562014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kahmann L, Uciechowski P, Warmuth S, Plümäkers B, Gressner AM, Malavolta M, Mocchegiani E and Rink L: Zinc supplementation in the elderly reduces spontaneous inflammatory cytokine release and restores T cell functions. Rejuvenation Res. 11:227–237. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
ILSI Brasil International Life Sciences Institute do Brasil: Vitamina D. Funções Plenamente Reconhecidas de Nutrientes. 2. Brazil: pp. 432018 | |
Pludowski P, Holick MF, Pilz S, Wagner CL, Hollis BW, Grant WB, Shoenfeld Y, Lerchbaum E, Llewellyn DJ, Kienreich K and Soni M: Vitamin D effects on musculoskeletal health, immunity, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, cancer, fertility, pregnancy, dementia and mortality-a review of recent evidence. Autoimmun Rev. 12:976–989. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Catarino AM, Claro C and Viana I: Vitamin D-current perspectives. J Portug Soc Dermatol Venereol. 74:345–353. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
White JH: Regulation of intracrine production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and its role in innate immune defense against infection. Arch Biochem Biophys. 523:58–63. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Evans KN, Taylor H, Zehnder D, Kilby MD, Bulmer JN, Shah F, Adams JS and Hewison M: Increased expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1alpha-hydroxylase in dysgerminomas: A novel form of humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy. Am J Pathol. 165:807–813. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stoffels K, Overbergh L, Giulietti A, Verlinden L, Bouillon R and Mathieu C: Immune regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin-D3-1alpha-hydroxylase in human monocytes. J Bone Miner Res. 21:37–47. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hewison M, Freeman L, Hughes SV, Evans KN, Bland R, Eliopoulos AG, Kilby MD, Moss PA and Chakraverty R: Differential regulation of vitamin D receptor and its ligand in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol. 170:5382–5390. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fritsche J, Mondal K, Ehrnsperger A, Andreesen R and Kreutz M: Regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1 alpha-hydroxylase and production of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by human dendritic cells. Blood. 102:3314–3316. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Enioutina EY, Bareyan D and Daynes RA: TLR-induced local metabolism of vitamin D3 plays an important role in the diversification of adaptive immune responses. J Immunol. 182:4296–4305. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Enioutina EY, Bareyan D and Daynes RA: TLR ligands that stimulate the metabolism of vitamin D3 in activated murine dendritic cells can function as effective mucosal adjuvants to subcutaneously administered vaccines. Vaccine. 26:601–613. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hansdottir S, Monick MM, Hinde SL, Lovan N, Look DC and Hunninghake GW: Respiratory epithelial cells convert inactive vitamin D to its active form: Potential effects on host defense. J Immunol. 181:7090–7099. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Overbergh L, Stoffels K, Waer M, Verstuyf A, Bouillon R and Mathieu C: Immune regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1alpha-hydroxylase in human monocytic THP1 cells: Mechanisms of interferon-gamma-mediated induction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 91:3566–3574. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rhodes JM, Subramanian S, Laird E, Griffin G and Kenny RA: Perspective: Vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 severity-plausibly linked by latitude, ethnicity, impacts on cytokines, ACE2 and thrombosis. J Intern Med. Jul 2–2020.Epub ahead of print. | |
Yan T, Xiao R and Lin G: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2: A double-edged sword? FASEB J. 34:6017–6026. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada T, Leong-Poi H, et al: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 436:112–116. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kuba K, Imai Y, Rao S, Gao H, Guo F, Guan B, Huan Y, Yang P, Zhang Y, Deng W, et al: A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med. 11:875–879. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar D, Gupta P and Banerjee D: Letter: Does vitamin D have a potential role against COVID-19? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 52:409–411. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Musavi H, Abazari O, Barartabar Z, Kalaki-Jouybari F, Hemmati-Dinarvand M, Esmaeili P and Mahjoub S: The benefits of vitamin D in the COVID-19 pandemic: Biochemical and immunological mechanisms. Arch Physiol Biochem:. Oct 8–2020.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Malek Mahdavi A: A brief review of interplay between vitamin D and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: Implications for a potential treatment for COVID-19. Rev Med Virol. 30:e21192020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Omori-Mizuno Y, Nakayama N, Inao M, Funyu J, Asabe S, Tomita K, Nishikawa K, Hosoda Y, Tanaka M, Hashimoto Y, et al: Randomized study comparing vitamin D3 and 1alpha-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in combination with pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 30:1384–1390. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abu-Mouch S, Fireman Z, Jarchovsky J, Zeina AR and Assy N: Vitamin D supplementation improves sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1)-naive patients. World J Gastroenterol. 17:5184–5190. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nimer A and Mouch A: Vitamin D improves viral response in hepatitis C genotype 2-3 naive patients. World J Gastroenterol. 18:800–805. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yokoyama S, Takahashi S, Kawakami Y, Hayes CN, Kohno H, Kohno H, Tsuji K, Aisaka Y, Kira S, Yamashina K, et al: Effect of vitamin D supplementation on pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b: A randomized controlled trial. J Viral Hepat. 21:348–356. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Petta S, Cammà C, Scazzone C, Tripodo C, Di Marco V, Bono A, Cabibi D, Licata G, Porcasi R, Marchesini G and Craxí A: Low vitamin D serum level is related to severe fibrosis and low responsiveness to interferon-based therapy in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 51:1158–1167. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Behera MK, Shukla SK, Dixit VK, Nath P, Abhilash VB, Asati PK and Jain AK: Effect of vitamin D supplementation on sustained virological response in genotype 1/4 chronic hepatitis C treatment-naive patients from India. Indian J Med Res. 148:200–206. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang K, Hoshino Y, Dowdell K, Bosch-Marce M, Myers TG, Sarmiento M, Pesnicak L, Krause PR and Cohen JI: Glutamine supplementation suppresses herpes simplex virus reactivation. J Clin Invest. 127:2626–2630. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang R, Dillon CP, Shi LZ, Milasta S, Carter R, Finkelstein D, McCormick LL, Fitzgerald P, Chi H, Munger J and Green DR: The transcription factor Myc controls metabolic reprogramming upon T lymphocyte activation. Immunity. 35:871–882. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakaya M, Xiao Y, Zhou X, Chang JH, Chang M, Cheng X, Blonska M, Lin X and Sun SC: Inflammatory T cell responses rely on amino acid transporter ASCT2 facilitation of glutamine uptake and mTORC1 kinase activation. Immunity. 40:692–705. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sinclair LV, Rolf J, Emslie E, Shi YB, Taylor PM and Cantrell DA: Control of amino-acid transport by antigen receptors coordinates the metabolic reprogramming essential for T cell differentiation. Nat Immunol. 14:500–508. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang WK, Yang KD and Shaio MF: Effect of glutamine on Th1 and Th2 cytokine responses of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Immunol. 93:294–301. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim J, Zhang J, Cha Y, Kolitz S, Funt J, Escalante Chong R, Barrett S, Kusko R, Zeskind B and Kaufman H: Advanced bioinformatics rapidly identifies existing therapeutics for patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). J Transl Med. 18:2572020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Bosman RJ, Treskes M, van der Spoel HJ and Zandstra DF: Plasma glutamine depletion and patient outcome in acute ICU admissions. Intensive Care Med. 27:84–90. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
O'Mahony JB, Palder SB, Wood JJ, McIrvine A, Rodrick ML, Demling RH and Mannick JA: Depression of cellular immunity after multiple trauma in the absence of sepsis. J Trauma. 24:869–875. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
O'Sullivan ST, Lederer JA, Horgan AF, Chin DH, Mannick JA and Rodrick ML: Major injury leads to predominance of the T helper-2 lymphocyte phenotype and diminished interleukin-12 production associated with decreased resistance to infection. Ann Surg. 222:482–490; discussion 490-492. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fläring UB, Rooyackers OE, Wernerman J and Hammarqvist F: Glutamine attenuates post-traumatic glutathione depletion in human muscle. Clin Sci (Lond). 104:275–282. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mittendorfer B, Gore DC, Herndon DN and Wolfe RR: Accelerated glutamine synthesis in critically ill patients cannot maintain normal intramuscular free glutamine concentration. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 23:243–252. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Houdijk AP, Rijnsburger ER, Jansen J, Wesdorp RI, Weiss JK, McCamish MA, Teerlink T, Meuwissen SG, Haarman HJ, Thijs LG and van Leeuwen PA: Randomised trial of glutamine-enriched enteral nutrition on infectius morbidity in patients with multiple trauma. Lancet. 352:772–776. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boelens PG, Houdijk AP, Fonk JC, Puyana JC, Haarman HJ, von Blomberg-van der Flier ME and van Leeuwen PA: Glutamine-enriched enteral nutrition increases in vitro interferon-gamma production but does not influence the in vivo specific antibody response to KLH after severe trauma. A prospective, double blind, randomized clinical study. Clin Nutr. 23:391–400. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tao KM, Li XQ, Yang LQ, Yu WF, Lu ZJ, Sun YM and Wu FX: Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD0100502014. |