Crosstalk between mitochondrial ROS and depolarization in the potentiation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human tumor cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 10, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.2215
- Pages: 616-628
Abstract
Introduction
Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a member of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine family, selectively induces cancer cell death by binding to two death domain-containing receptors, TRAIL-receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1)/death receptor (DR) 4 and TRAIL-R2/DR5 (1,2). Binding of TRAIL to TRAIL-R1 or TRAIL-R2 expressed on the cell surface initiates the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, in which caspase-8 plays a key role (3,4). Active caspase-8 directly activates the effector caspase-3, -6 and -7 that execute the apoptotic process. Caspase-8 can also engage the intrinsic (mitochondrial) apoptotic pathway by cleaving and activating the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-family molecule Bid (5). Truncated Bid activates Bax and Bak, leading to their oligomerization and pore formation in the outer mitochondrial membrane through which cytochrome c is released into the cytosol. The released cytochrome c binds to another pro-apoptotic protein Apaf-1, leading to assembly of the apoptosome and the resulting activation of caspase-9 (6). Caspase-9 also activates caspase-3, -6 and -7, thereby providing a positive feedback loop to the caspase-8-induced apoptotic events. In a few type I cancer cells, the extrinsic pathway is sufficient to commit the cells to apoptosis, while in most type II cancer cells, the activation of caspase-8 is low and amplification by the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is necessary to evoke substantial apoptosis (7).
Since TRAIL induces apoptosis in a variety of transformed and cancer cells, but not in normal cells, it is promising for cancer treatment. However, some cancer cell types, such as malignant melanoma, glioma, osteosarcoma and non-small cell lung cancer cells, are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis despite expression of the death-inducing TRAIL-Rs on their cell surface (8). Moreover, TRAIL-responsive tumors acquire a resistant phenotype that renders TRAIL therapy ineffective. Therefore, overcoming the TRAIL-resistance of cancer cells is necessary for effective TRAIL therapy, and drugs that can potentiate TRAIL effectiveness are urgently required.
Depolarization has been shown to be an early event in the apoptosis induced by diverse agents, including Fas (9), rotenone (ROT) (10) and arsenic trioxide (11), and is considered to play an important pro-apoptotic role. On the contrary, depolarization has also been shown to exhibit anti-apoptotic effects. Various membrane-depolarizing agents, including ouabain, tetraethylammonium (TEA) and veratridine, protect Purkinje cells against apoptosis (12). These observations suggest that depolarization can act in both pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic manners depending on the cell types and apoptotic stimuli involved. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these dual functions are unclear. Compared with other DRs, the role of depolarization in TRAIL-induced apoptosis is poorly documented. We previously showed that robust depolarization is an early event during TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human melanoma cells. Moreover, membrane-depolarizing agents including K+ and ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel inhibitors such as glibenclamide (GLB) and U37883A (U37) markedly potentiated TRAIL-induced apoptosis (13). This depolarization-mediated potentiation of apoptosis was associated with upregulation of the mitochondrial death pathway and endolasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated death pathway involving caspase-12. Strikingly, melanocytes were insensitive to TRAIL-induced depolarization and apoptosis as well as the potentiation by membrane-depolarizing drugs (13). These observations suggest a tumor-selective role of depolarization in regulating apoptosis. However, it remains to be elucidated whether this effect of depolarization is characteristic of melanoma cells or a general feature of different tumor cell types and how depolarization affects these two death pathways. In the present study, we addressed these questions by performing similar experiments in human Jurkat leukemia cells and A549 lung cancer cells. In addition, we examined the possible role of mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species (mROS) in the potentiation of apoptosis, since our previous study showed that mROS mediated mitochondrial and ER dysfunctions in Jurkat cells during TRAIL-induced apoptosis (14). The results showed that the previous observations in melanoma cells can essentially be expanded to other tumor cells with different origins. Moreover, we found that depolarization and mROS mutually control one another. Importantly, our results suggest a positive loop between depolarization and mROS through DR5 expression.
Materials and methods
Reagents
Soluble recombinant human TRAIL and the K+ channel inhibitors GLB, U37, TEA, 5-hydroxydecanoate (HD), α-dendrotoxin (DTX) and charybdotoxin (CTX) were obtained from Enzo Life Sciences (San Diego, CA, USA). Throughout this study, TRAIL was generally used at concentrations of 6.3–100 ng/ml and the K+ channel inhibitors were used at 100 μM. ROT, antimycin A, oligomycin and carbonylcyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Mn(III) tetrakis (4-benzoic acid) porphyrin chloride (MnTBaP), pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fluoromethylketone (FMK), caspase-3/7-specific inhibitor z-DEVD-FMK, caspase-8-specific inhibitor z-IETD-FMK and caspase-9-specific inhibitor z-LEHD-FMK were purchased from Merck Japan (Tokyo, Japan). The caspase-12-specific inhibitor z-ATAD-FMK and caspase-4-specific inhibitor z-LEVD-FMK were purchased from BioVision (Mountain View, CA, USA). The reagents were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide and diluted with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) to a final dimethylsulfoxide concentration of <0.1% before use. Antimycin A was used with 0.5 μg/ml oligomycin to inhibit complex III activity of the electron transport chain (referred as to AM).
Cell culture
Human Jurkat leukemia cells were obtained from RIKEN BioResource Center Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan) and cultured in high glucose-containing RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich) in a 5% CO2-containing atmosphere. Human A549 lung cancer cells and human fetal fibroblast-like lung cell WI-38-40 were obtained from Health Science Research Resource Bank (Osaka, Japan) and grown in low glucose-containing Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% FBS in a 5% CO2-containing atmosphere. The cells were harvested by incubation in 0.25% trypsin-EDTA medium (Gibco-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 5 min at 37°C.
Measurement of depolarization
Depolarization was measured by flow cytometry using bis-oxonol (Enzo Life Sciences), an anionic dye that shows increased fluorescence intensity upon membrane depolarization, as previously described (13). Briefly, 4×105 cells suspended in 500 μl of HBSS were incubated with 100 nM dye for 15 min at 37°C, and then incubated with the agents to be tested for 2–4 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2-containing atmosphere. Subsequently, 1×104 cells were counted for their fluorescence using the FL-2 channel of a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Determination of surface DR4/DR5 expression
The expression levels of DR4 and TDR5 on the cell surface were determined by flow cytometry as previously described (14). Briefly, 5×105 cells/100 μl were incubated with monoclonal anti-human DR4 and DR5 antibodies or mouse isotype-matched control antibodies (R&D Systems; Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were then centrifuged into a pellet, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline, and incubated with phycoerythrin-conjugated goat F(ab′)2 anti-mouse IgG (R&D Systems) for 30 min at 4°C. The fluorescence was measured using the FL-2 channel of the FACSCalibur and analyzed using CellQuest software.
Determination of apoptotic cell death
Apoptotic cell death was quantitatively assessed by double-staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) as previously described (13). Briefly, 2×105 cells/ml in 24-well plates were incubated with the agents to be tested for 20 h in 10% FBS-containing medium at 37°C. Subsequently, the cells were stained with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI using a commercially available kit (Annexin V FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit I; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The stained cells were evaluated in the FACSCalibur and analyzed using the CellQuest software. Four cellular subpopulations were evaluated: viable cells (Annexin V−/PI−); early apoptotic cells (Annexin V+/PI−); late apoptotic cells (Annexin V+/PI+); and necrotic/damaged cells (Annexin V−/PI+). Annexin V+ cells were considered to be apoptotic cells.
Measurement of mROS
mROS was measured by flow cytometry using MitoSOX Red [(3,8-phenanthridinediamine, 5-(6′-triphenyl-phosphoniumhexyl)-5,6-dihydro-6-phenyl); Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA] as previously described (14). Briefly, 5×105 cells suspended in 500 μl of HBSS were incubated with the agents to be tested for various times at 37°C, followed by incubation with 5 μM MitoSOX for 15 min at 37°C. The cells were then washed, resuspended in HBSS on ice, and centrifuged at 4°C. The red fluorescence was measured using the FL-2 channel of the FACSCalibur and analyzed using CellQuest software. The data were expressed as F/F0, where F0 was the fluorescence in unstimulated cells and F was the fluorescence in stimulated cells.
Measurements of caspase-3/7 activation and mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm)
Activation of caspase-3/7 and changes in Δψm in Jurkat cells were simultaneously measured as previously described (13). Briefly, 2×105 cells/ml in 24-well plates were treated with the agents to be tested for 20 h in 10% FBS-containing RPMI-1640 medium at 37°C, and then stained with the dual sensor MitoCasp™ (Cell Technology Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Caspase-3/7 activation and Δψm were evaluated using the FACSCalibur and the data were analyzed using CellQuest software. Changes in Δψm after a short TRAIL treatment were measured using the lipophilic cation JC-1 (5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3, 3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) as previously described (13). Briefly, 5×105 cells/500 μl were loaded with 2 μM JC-1 at 37°C for 15 min, washed, and resuspended in HBSS. After cell stimulation for 2 or 4 h, the green fluorescence (monomeric JC-1) and red fluorescence (J-aggregates) were measured using the FL-1 and FL-2 channels, respectively, of the FACSCalibur and analyzed using CellQuest software.
Measurement of caspase-12 activation
Caspase-12 activation in living cells was measured using the caspase-12 inhibitor ATAD-FMK conjugated to FITC (FITC-ATAD-FMK) as previously described (13). FITC-ATAD-FMK is cell-permeable and non-toxic, and binds irreversibly to active caspase-12, but not inactive caspase-12, in apoptotic cells. Briefly, 2×105 cells/ml in 24-well plates were treated with the agents to be tested for 20 h in 10% FBS-containing medium at 37°C and then stained with a CaspGLOW™ Fluorescein Active Caspase-12 Staining Kit (BioVision) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The fluorescence was determined using the FL-1 channel of the FACSCalibur and analyzed using CellQuest software.
Measurement of cardiolipin oxidation
Oxidation of cardiolipin was measured by flow cytometry using the fluorescent dye 10-N-nonyl acridine orange (NAO; Invitrogen), which binds to non-oxidized cardiolipin, but not to oxidized cardiolipin, as previously described (14). Briefly, 5×105 cells suspended in 500 μl of HBSS were incubated with the agents to be tested for 4 h at 37°C, and then incubated with 100 nM NAO for 15 min at 37°C. The harvested cells were washed and resuspended in HBSS on ice. Their fluorescence was measured using the FL-1 channel of the FACSCalibur and analyzed using CellQuest software. The data were expressed as F/F0, where F0 was the fluorescence in unstimulated cells and F was the fluorescence in stimulated cells.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (14). Briefly, 1×106 cells/ml in 6-well plates were treated with the agents to be tested for 20 h in 10% FBS-containing medium at 37°C, washed, and lysed with SDS-sample buffer. Whole cell lysates (30 μg protein) were subjected to SDS-PAGE using a 10% separation gel under reducing conditions and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated with BlockAce (Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Osaka, Japan) for 1 h at room temperature, washed, incubated with polyclonal antibodies against X-box-binding protein (XBP)-1 or caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology Japan, Tokyo, Japan) overnight at 4°C, washed again, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated species-specific anti-rabbit Ig (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) for 1 h at room temperature. After extensive washing, the immunoreactive proteins on the membranes were detected using an Enhanced ChemiLuminescence (ECL) Prime Kit (GE Healthcare Japan) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. To verify equal loading, the membranes were re-probed with a monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The signal intensities were quantified relative to the GAPDH signal intensity using NIH Image software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of differences among multiple groups was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey’s test. The significance of differences between two individual groups was analyzed by Student’s t-test. Values of P<0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results
K+-mediated depolarization potentiates TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human tumor cells with different origins
To determine whether the modulation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis by membrane-depolarizing agents is a general feature of tumor cells with different origins, we examined the effect of high K+ loading on TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Jurkat leukemia cells. The cells were treated with TRAIL in the presence or absence of 50 mM KCl for 20 h, and then double-stained with Annexin V/PI. TRAIL at concentrations of ≥6.3 ng/ml increased apoptotic (Annexin V+/PI−) cells, but not necrotic (Annexin V−/PI+) cells, in a dose-dependent manner. KCl alone caused minimal cell death, but significantly potentiated TRAIL-induced apoptosis (Fig. 1A). Measurement of membrane potential changes using bis-oxonol showed that KCl induced rapid (within 5 min) membrane depolarization that peaked at 2 h and declined thereafter (Fig. 1B). TRAIL evoked robust depolarization in a dose- and time-dependent manner, but the effect was observed after a considerable time lag. The effect was initially observed at 2 h for 100 ng/ml TRAIL (1.3-fold) and developed during another 2 h to reach 1.3- and 1.6-fold for 25 and 100 ng/ml TRAIL, respectively (Fig. 1B). K+ loading also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis, but not necrosis, in A549 lung cancer cells (Fig. 1C). In contrast, TRAIL and KCl alone or in combination caused minimal cell death in WI-38-40 fibroblasts despite their substantial DR5 expression (Fig. 1D). Collectively, these findings show that K+-mediated depolarization potentiates TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human tumor cells with different origins, but not in non-transformed cells.
KATP inhibitors specifically potentiate TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human tumor cells with different origins
To verify the role of depolarization, we examined the effects of the KATP channel inhibitors GLB and U37. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, each drug markedly potentiated the TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells, although they caused minimal cell death on their own. In contrast, TEA, which mainly inhibits voltage-dependent potassium (Kv) channel and Ca2+-dependent potassium (KCa) channels, had no such effect (Fig. 2B), suggesting a specific role of KATP channels in the potentiation. In support of this view, treatment of the cells with the Kv channel-specific inhibitor DTX and KCa channel-specific inhibitor CTX for 20 h had minimal effects on the apoptosis (Fig. 2C). The mitochondrial KATP channel inhibitor HD had no effect either. All of these drugs had minimal effects on the apoptosis for at least another 48 h (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 2D, GLB or U37 alone increased the depolarization by 1.4- and 2.6-fold, respectively, and higher degrees of depolarization were observed in the cells treated with TRAIL in the presence of each drug compared with the cells treated with TRAIL alone. However, unlike the case for apoptosis, their effects were less than additive. In contrast, TEA induced marginal depolarization (maximum of 1.2-fold) and had a minimal effect on TRAIL-induced depolarization. GLB and U37 also potentiated the TRAIL-induced apoptosis in A549 cells, while TEA, DTX and CTX had no such effects (data not shown). Again, GLB and U37 alone or in combination with TRAIL had minimal effects on the survival of WI-38-40 fibroblasts (data not shown). These results show that KATP channel inhibitors specifically potentiate TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human tumor cells with different origins, but not in non-transformed cells.
Potentiation of apoptosis is associated with upregulation of cell surface DR5 expression
Since amplification of TRAIL-induced apoptosis is often associated with upregulated expression of DR5 (15–17), we examined the effects of the membrane-depolarizing agents on the expressions of DR4 and DR5. Jurkat cells were exposed to KCl for various times and analyzed for their expression levels of DR4 and DR5 on the cell surface using specific antibodies. Until 4 h after K+ loading, the cell surface DR4 and DR5 expression levels were minimally changed compared with their basal levels. On the other hand, K+ loading for a longer time (20 h) increased the cell surface DR5 expression by 1.6-fold, but minimally increased the cell surface DR4 expression (Fig. 3A). Similarly, GLB and U37 increased the DR5 expression levels by 1.8- and 1.2-fold, respectively, while the former, but not the latter, marginally increased the DR4 expression (maximum of 1.2-fold). In contrast, TEA had minimal effects on the DR4 and DR5 expression levels (Fig. 3A). These results show that the potentiation of apoptosis is associated with upregulation of cell surface DR5 expression.
Membrane-depolarizing agents potentiate the mitochondrial death pathway
We previously showed that TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells and A375 cells was caspase-dependent (13,14). Therefore, an array of caspase-specific inhibitors (10 μM) were tested for their abilities to affect the potentiation of apoptosis. The pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-FMK almost completely blocked apoptosis. The caspase-8-specific inhibitor z-IETD-FMK, caspase-9-specific inhibitor z-LEHD-FMK, and/or caspase-3/7-specific inhibitor z-DEVD-FMK significantly abolished the effects of KCl or U37 (Fig. 4A and B), indicating that both the extrinsic and intrinsic (mitochondrial) apoptotic pathways are involved in the potentiation. Consistent with the role of caspase-12 in the TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells (14), the caspase-12-specific inhibitor z-ATAD-FMK also completely abrogated the effects of KCl or U37 (Fig. 4A and B). In support of the role of the mitochondrial death pathway, TRAIL induced robust mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization and activation of caspase-3/7. The MMP depolarization and caspase-3/7 activation were markedly potentiated by KCl or KATP channel inhibitors, although each drug alone, except for GLB, had minimal effects on the two events (Fig. 4C and D). Consistent with the role of caspase-3, TRAIL induced robust caspase-3 cleavage, as shown by the appearance of a truncated form, i.e., caspase-3 (19 kDa) (Fig. 4E). KCl potentiated the effect, resulting in the new appearance of an even smaller form of caspase-3 (17 kDa). The appearance of caspase-3 (17 kDa) was completely abrogated by the pan-caspase inhibitor and the specific inhibitors of caspase-8, -9, -3 and-12, but not by that of caspase-4. The caspase-8 and caspase-12 inhibitors also abolished the appearance of caspase-3 (19 kDa), while the caspase-9 inhibitor did not (Fig. 4E). These results show that in the presence or absence of depolarization, TRAIL induces caspase-3 cleavage in a different manner.
Membrane-depolarizing agents potentiate ER stress responses
We previously showed that TRAIL induced ER stress in Jurkat cells (14). The ER-mediated death pathway is another pathway for apoptosis that is independent of the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways (18–20). To examine the possible role of this pathway, we analyzed the effects of the membrane-depolarizing drugs on XBP-1 activation, a cellular response to ER stress. Western blot analyses revealed that TRAIL dose-dependently increased the expression levels of both the inactive unspliced form of XBP-1 (XBP-1u) and the active spliced form of XBP-1 (XBP-1s) by about 2-fold, indicating activation of XBP-1. Although each drug alone caused minimal activation of XBP-1, KCl and KATP channel inhibitors, but not TEA, markedly potentiated the effects of TRAIL (Fig. 5A). Next, we examined the effects of the membrane-depolarizing agents on TRAIL-induced caspase-12 activation. The activation of caspase-12 was evaluated by measuring the conversion of a cell-permeable substrate, FITC-ATAD-FMK. As shown in Fig. 5B, each drug alone except for GLB, caused minimal caspase-12 activation, while KCl and KATP channel inhibitors, but not TEA, markedly potentiated TRAIL-induced caspase-12 activation. Taken together, these results show that the membrane-depolarizing agents potentiate ER stress responses including caspase-12 activation.
Functional coupling of mROS and depolarization during TRAIL-induced apoptosis
Previously we showed that TRAIL treatment resulted in mROS accumulation that mediated mitochondrial and ER dysfunctions during TRAIL-induced apoptosis (14). Therefore, we investigated the possible role of mROS in the potentiation of apoptosis by depolarization. To explore the possibility that mROS mediate the depolarization, we examined the effects of membrane-depolarizing drugs on mROS generation. MitoSOX Red localizes to mitochondria and serves as a fluoroprobe for selective detection of superoxide in these organelles (21,22). TRAIL induced mROS generation in a dose-dependent manner, and KCl or U37 markedly potentiated this effect, while each drug alone minimally increased the generation (Fig. 6A). Oxidation of cardiolipin serves as another biochemical hallmark of mitochondrial oxidative stress, because this phospholipid exists in association with cytochrome c on the outer surface of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Because the fluorescent dye NAO binds to the non-oxidized form, but not to the oxidized form, of cardiolipin, independently of Δψm, measurements of NAO fluorescence enable us to monitor the oxidation of cardiolipin in mitochondria (23). Consistent with our previous study (14), TRAIL treatment resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in NAO fluorescence, indicating the induction of cardiolipin oxidation. Agonistic antibodies against DR4 and DR5, which trigger the formation of multimeric complexes containing only specific TRAIL-Rs (24–26) also induced robust cardiolipin oxidation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6B), indicating that this oxidation is mediated by DR4/DR5. Collectively, these results show that TRAIL induces mROS accumulation and that depolarization potentiates this process. Mitochondria serve a major source of ROS under physiological conditions and generate large amounts of ROS when their metabolism is impaired under pathological conditions. Indeed, we previously showed that mitochondrial metabolic inhibitors, such as the complex I inhibitor ROT, complex III inhibitor AM and mitochondrial uncoupling agent FCCP, considerably increased the mROS levels in Jurkat cells, thereby enhancing the TRAIL-induced mitochondrial and ER dysfunctions and apoptosis (14). In agreement with these previous observations, FCCP considerably increased the cardiolipin oxidation (Fig. 6B). To obtain further evidence for the functional coupling between mROS and depolarization, we examined the ability of these metabolic inhibitors to provoke depolarization. As expected, among these metabolic inhibitors, FCCP was the most potent at provoking depolarization (Fig. 6C). This effect (1.7-fold) was comparable to that of 100 ng/ml of TRAIL, while ROT and AM had marginal effects (maximum of 1.2-fold), in parallel with their effects on MitoSOX Red signals (14). The coincident induction of depolarization and mROS led us to hypothesize the presence of another biochemical consequence between them. i.e., that mROS mediate the depolarization. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of MnTBaP on the TRAIL-induced depolarization, since this antioxidant can block TRAIL-induced mROS generation in the cells (14). As shown in Fig. 6D, treatment with non-toxic concentrations of MnTBaP ranging from 3 to 30 μM dose-dependently reduced the TRAIL-induced depolarization. The effectiveness of this antioxidant varied considerably depending on the concentration of TRAIL applied. MnTBaP (30 μM) almost completely reduced the depolarization induced by 25 ng/ml TRAIL, while it reduced the depolarization induced by 100 ng/ml TRAIL by a maximum of 50% (Fig. 6D). Consequently, the levels of depolarization became comparable to those induced by 25 ng/ml TRAIL. On the other hand, MnTBaP reduced the depolarization induced by FCCP by only 20% even when used at the highest concentration. Collectively, these findings show a closed functional coupling of mROS and depolarization during TRAIL-induced apoptosis.
Role of mROS in the potentiation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis by depolarization in human A375 melanoma cells
Since depolarization potentiates TRAIL-induced apoptosis in several human melanoma cell lines (13), we investigated whether similar biochemical pathways involving mROS underlie this potentiation using A375 melanoma cells as a model. First, we examined the effects of the membrane-depolarizing drugs on the cell surface DR expression levels. Until 4 h after exposure to each drug, the DR4 and DR5 expression levels were minimally changed compared with their basal levels. On the other hand, treatment with KCl or U37 for 20 h increased the DR5 expression levels by 1.3 and 1.6-fold, respectively, while minimally increasing the DR4 expression levels (Fig. 7A). In contrast, GLB and TEA had minimal effects on the DR4 and DR5 expression levels, in parallel with their ineffectiveness at potentiating apoptosis (13). Similar to Jurkat cells (14), ROT, AM and FCCP increased the mROS levels. Among these agents, AM was the most powerful (7.8-fold) and the effects of ROT and FCCP were comparable (1.9- and 2.1-fold, respectively). These drugs also potentiated TRAIL-induced apoptosis in the cells (Fig. 7B). For 25 ng/ml TRAIL, necrotic cell death was also substantially increased. Finally, we examined whether these mitochondrial metabolic inhibitors affected the cell membrane potential. AM and FCCP, but not ROT, alone caused robust depolarization (1.2-1.4-fold), and potentiated TRAIL-induced depolarization (Fig. 7C), indicating that mROS accumulation potentiates depolarization. Conversely, MnTBaP treatment, which abolishes mROS generation in melanoma cells (27), considerably reduced TRAIL-induced depolarization in a dose-dependent manner and this effect was more pronounced for lower concentrations of TRAIL (e.g. 30 μM MnTBaP reduced 25 and 100 ng/ml TRAIL-induced depolarization by 62% and 48%, respectively). These results show that similar biochemical pathways including upregulation of surface DR5 expression and mROS accumulation regulate the depolarization-mediated potentiation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis in the cells.
Discussion
This study was undertaken to examine whether depolarization plays a general role in TRAIL-induced tumor cell apoptosis, and can therefore serve as a common target for treatment of tumor cells with different origins. The data presented in this paper taken together with our previous data show that membrane-depolarizing agents, such as K+ and KATP channel inhibitors, potentiate TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human tumor cells with different origins, including Jurkat leukemia cells, and A549 lung cancer cells, but not in non-transformed melanocytes and fibroblsts. Plasma membrane KATP channels appear to be specifically associated with the apoptosis, since inhibitors of other potassium channels, such as KCa and Kv and mitochondrial KATP channels had no such effect. The findings expand our previous findings for melanoma cells to various types of human malignant cells, and indicate that depolarization may be a tumor-selective target for potentiating apoptosis. This may strengthen the therapeutic potential of membrane-depolarizing agents in cancer treatment. Our previous study showed that membrane-depolarizing agents potentiate TRAIL-induced apoptosis in melanoma cells by upregulating mitochondrial and ER-associated death pathways (13). The present study indicates that this is a common mechanism at least among certain cell types, including Jurkat cells. In addition, this study provides new insight into the mechanisms by which depolarization potentiates these two death pathways. First, we found that K+ and KATP channel inhibitors commonly upregulated surface DR5 expression in Jurkat cells and A375 melanoma cells, similar to the effects of diverse chemicals such as thapsigargin, tunicamycin and 2-deoxy-D-glucose on melanoma cells (15–17). In contrast, inhibitors of other potassium channels such as TEA had no such effects. Essentially similar results were obtained in A375 melanoma cells. Thus, the upregulation of surface DR5 expression may be relevant to KATP channels function and play a role in the potentiation of apoptosis. Second, we found that the potentiation of death signals is not only caused by quantitative changes but also by qualitative changes. Western blot analyses revealed that depolarization modulated the manner of caspase-3 cleavage, a molecular hallmark of the enzyme activation. TRAIL alone induced cleavage of caspase-3 (35 kDa) to caspase-3 (19 kDa), while under depolarization conditions, TRAIL caused a higher degree of caspase-3 cleavage, resulting in new appearance of an even smaller form, caspase-3 (17 kDa). The appearance of caspase-3 (19/17 kDa) was completely blocked by specific inhibitors of caspase-8 and caspase-9, as well as caspase-3, consistent with the conventional view that caspase-3 activation occurs downstream of extrinsic (caspase-8) and intrinsic (caspase-9) pathways. Caspase-12 is ubiquitously expressed, localized to the ER membrane, and specifically activated by ER stress to play a key role in stress-induced apoptosis (28–30) The caspase-12 inhibitor prevented the cleavage of caspase-3, suggesting that caspase-12 is also involved in the activation of caspase-3. Strikingly, however, the caspase-9 inhibitor prevented the appearance of caspase-3 (17 kDa), but not that of caspase-3 (19 kDa), suggesting that different sets of caspases are involved in the two different manners of caspase-3 cleavage. Thus, depolarization may modulate the caspase cascade pathways involved in caspase-3 activation. Caspase-4, another ER-associated caspase, has also been shown to play a role in ER stress-mediated apoptosis in melanoma cells (31,32). However, the caspase-4-specific inhibitor had minimal effects on the cleavage of caspase-3, suggesting that if caspase-4 does play a role in the potentiation, it may have another target. Further studies investigating the roles of these two ER-associated caspases in the potentiation are under way.
Our previous findings that mROS mediate mitochondrial and ER dysfunctions in Jurkat cells (14) led us to investigate the possible role of mROS in the potentiation of apoptosis. The membrane-depolarizing agents by themselves increased mROS and potentiated TRAIL-induced mROS generation, indicating that depolarization controls mROS. It is notable that depolarization increased the surface expression of DR5, the triggering of which increases mROS. Since depolarization potentiated the TRAIL-induced activation of the transcription factor XBP-1, which is engaged in the regulation of surface DR5 expression (17), it is possible to speculate that the upregulation of surface DR5 expression results in increased mROS accumulation, thereby causing mitochondrial and ER dysfunctions. On the other hand, our data showed that scavenging of mROS by the antioxidant MnTBaP reduced depolarization, while mROS accumulation caused by metabolic dysfunction potentiated the depolarization. These data indicate that mROS control the depolarization. However, several lines of evidence suggest that this role is limited for weak depolarization. First, depolarization became more resistant to MnTBaP treatment as the concentration of TRAIL (magnitude of depolarization) increased. Second, FCCP-induced depolarization was quite resistant to MnTBaP. It is noteworthy that 5 μM FCCP and 100 ng/ml TRAIL caused comparable levels of mROS accumulation (14) and depolarization (this study), although the time courses of these events were quite different. TRAIL provoked depolarization and mROS accumulation after a considerable time lag, while FCCP caused both responses rapidly. It is noted that FCCP was much more powerful than TRAIL for inducing MMP depolarization. TRAIL induced a moderate MMP depolarization (28%) with a lag of 2 h, while FCCP caused strong MMP depolarization (92%) immediately. Taken together with the dose-dependent induction of MMP depolarization by TRAIL, these observations suggest that mROS are responsible for weak depolarization, while another event, probably MMP depolarization is required for strong depolarization. Further studies are necessary to prove this hypothesis. Collectively, our data suggest that depolarization and mROS accumulation mutually regulated one another and that a positive loop exists between the two events (Fig. 8). Although the precise mechanisms underlying the mutual regulation remain to be elucidated, this finding may provide a rationale for the tumor-selective cytotoxicity and/or potentiation of TRAIL cytotoxicity of a wide variety of ROS-producing substances such as wogonin (33,34) and diallyl trisulfide (35,36) in different types of cancer cells including leukemia and melanoma cells.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr M. Murai and Dr T. Inoue for technical assistance. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (KAKENHI 23591631; to Y.S-K.) and Grant-in-Aid from Nihon University (to Y.S-K.).
References
LeBlanc HN and Ashkenazi A: Apo2L/TRAIL and its death and decoy. Cell Death Differ. 10:66–75. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kischkel FC, Lawrence DA, Chuntharapai A, Schow P, Kim KJ and Ashkenazi A: Apo2L/TRAIL-dependent recruitment of endogenous FADD and caspase-8 to death receptors 4 and 5. Immunity. 12:612–620. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lavrik IN, Golks A and Krammer PH: Caspases: pharmacological manipulation of cell death. J Clin Invest. 15:2665–2662. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Danial NN and Korsmeyer SJ: Cell death: critical control points. Cell. 116:205–219. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Green DR: Apoptotic pathways: paper wraps stone blunts scissors. Cell. 102:1–4. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Korsmeyer SJ, Wei MC, Saito M, Weiler S, Oh KJ and Schlesinger PH: Pro-apoptotic cascade activates BID, which oligomerizes BAK or BAX into pores that result in the release of cytochrome c. Cell Death Differ. 7:1166–1173. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yan N and Shi Y: Mechanisms of apoptosis through structural biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 21:35–56. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dyer MJ, MacFarlane M and Cohen GM: Barriers to effective TRAIL-targeted therapy of malignancy. J Clin Oncol. 25:4506–4507. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bortner CD, Gomez-Angelats M and Cidlowski JA: Plasma membrane depolarization without repolarization is an early molecular event in anti-Fas-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 276:4304–4314. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yin W, Li X, Feng S, et al: Plasma membrane depolarization and Na,K-ATPase impairment induced by mitochondrial toxins augment leukemia cell apoptosis via a novel mitochondrial amplification mechanism. Biochem Pharmacol. 78:191–202. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nolte F, Friedrich O, Rojewski M, Fink RH, Schrezenmeier H and Körper S: Depolarisation of the plasma membrane in the arsenic trioxide (As2O3)-and anti-CD95-induced apoptosis in myeloid cells. FEBS Lett. 578:85–89. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghoumari AM, Piochon C, Tomkiewicz C, et al: Neuroprotective effect of mifepristone involves neuron depolarization. FASEB J. 20:1377–1386. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suzuki Y, Inoue T, Murai M, Suzuki-Karasaki M, Ochiai T and Ra C: Depolarization potentiates TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human melanoma cells: role for ATP-sensitive K+ channels and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Int J Oncol. 41:465–475. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Inoue T and Suzuki-Karasaki Y: Mitochondrial superoxide mediates mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum dysfunctions in TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 61:273–284. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen LH, Jiang CC, Kiejda KA, et al: Thapsigargin sensitizes human melanoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by up-regulation of TRAIL-R2 through the unfolded protein response. Carcinogenesis. 28:2328–2336. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jiang CC, Chen LH, Gillespie S, et al: Tunicamycin sensitizes human melanoma cells to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis by up-regulation of TRAIL-R2 via the unfolded protein response. Cancer Res. 67:5880–5888. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu H, Jiang CC, Lavis CJ, et al: 2-Deoxy-D-glucose enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human melanoma cells through XBP-1-mediated up-regulation of TRAIL-R2. Mol Cancer. 8:1222009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boyce M and Yuan J: Cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum stress: a matter of life or death. Cell Death Differ. 13:363–373. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Breckenridge DG, Germain M, Mathai JP, Nguyen M and Shore GC: Regulation of apoptosis by endoplasmic reticulum pathways. Oncogene. 22:8608–8618. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Groenendyk J and Michalak M: Endoplasmic reticulum quality control and apoptosis. Acta Biochim Pol. 52:381–395. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Robinson KM, Janes MS, Pehar M, et al: Selective fluorescencet imaging of superoxide in vivo using ethidium-based probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:15038–15043. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mukhopadhyay P, Rajesh M, Kashiwaya Y, Haskó G and Pacher P: Simple quantitative detection of mitochondrial superoxide production in live cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 358:203–208. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Petit JM, Maftah A, Ratinaud MH and Julien R: 10N-nonyl acridine orange interacts with cardiolipin and allows the quantification of this phospholipid in isolated mitochondria. Eur J Biochem. 209:267–273. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Griffith TS, Rauch CT, Smolak PJ, et al: Functional analysis of TRAIL receptors using monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol. 162:2597–2605. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Pukac L, Kanakaraj P, Humphreys R, et al: HGS-ETR1, a fully human TRAIL-receptor 1 monoclonal antibody, induces cell death in multiple tumour types in vitro and in vivo. Br J Cancer. 92:1430–1441. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Georgakis GV, Li Y, Humphreys R, et al: Activity of selective fully human agonistic antibodies to the TRAIL death receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 in primary and cultured lymphoma cells: induction of apoptosis and enhancement of doxorubicin- and bortezomib-induced cell death. Br J Haematol. 130:501–510. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tochigi M, Inoue T, Suzuki-Karasaki M, Ochiai T, Ra C and Suzuki-Karasaki Y: Hydrogen peroxide induces cell death in human TRAIL-resistant melanoma through intracellular superoxide generation. Int J Oncol. 42:863–872. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakagawa T, Zhu H, Morishima N, Li E, Xu J, Yankner BA and Yuan J: Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid beta. Nature. 403:98–103. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Szegezdi E, Fitzgerald U and Samali A: Caspase-12 and ER-stress-mediated apoptosis: the story so far. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1010:186–194. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rutkowski DT and Kaufman RJ: A trip to the ER: coping with stress. Trends Cell Biol. 14:20–28. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jiang CC, Mao ZG, Avery-Kiejda KA, Wade M, Hersey P and Zhang XD: Glucose-regulated protein 78 antagonizes cisplatin and adriamycin in human melanoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 30:197–204. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mao ZG, Jiang CC, Yang F, Thorne RF, Hersey P and Zhang XD: TRAIL-induced apoptosis of human melanoma cells involves activation of caspase-4. Apoptosis. 15:1211–1222. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fas SC, Baumann S, Zhu JY, et al: Wogonin sensitizes resistant malignant cells to TNFalpha- and TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Blood. 108:3700–3706. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baumann S, Fas SC, Giaisi M, et al: Wogonin preferentially kills malignant lymphocytes and suppresses T-cell tumor growth by inducing PLCgamma1- and Ca2+-dependent apoptosis. Blood. 111:2354–2363. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Powlny AA and Singh SV: Multitargeted prevention and therapy of cancer by diallyl trisulfide and related Allium vegetable-derived organosulfur compounds. Cancer Lett. 269:305–314. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Murai M, Inoue T, Suzuki-Karasaki M, Ochiai T, Ra C, Nishida S, et al: Diallyl trisulfide sensitizes human melanoma cells to TRAIL-induced cell death by promoting endoplasmic reticulum-mediated apoptosis. Int J Oncol. 41:2029–2037. 2012. |