Tubular adenoma of the common bile duct with uptake in 18F‑FDG PET: A case report
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 9, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2015.676
- Pages: 35-38
-
Copyright: © Hokonohara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Adenomas of the colon and rectum are very common benign neoplasms, but adenomas of the common bile duct (CBD) are very rare diseases (1,2). Since bile duct adenomas often cause obstructive jaundice, patients are suspected to have CBD stones or malignant neoplasms. Adenomas of the bile duct are essentially benign tumors, although they are occasionally considered to be premalignant tumors. Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct (IPNB) have been proposed to be the biliary counterpart of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas, and the processes of the adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence in bile duct neoplasms have been identified (3–5). Treatments for bile duct adenoma are necessarily based on diagnostic results, and local resections of the CBD may be performed if the distal and proximal cut ends are free from the tumor, and the tumor is diagnosed to be benign. When a bile duct resection is insufficient for complete resection, or if a malignant transformation of the tumor is suspected, consequently, pancreatoduodenectomy should be considered (5).
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is used for cancer diagnosis and staging, and is often used for CBD tumors. 18F-FDG PET is known to have 92.3% sensitivity, and 92.9% specificity, in the diagnosis of bile duct cancer (6), although whether 18F-FDG PET is able to differentially discriminate between diagnoses of adenoma and carcinoma of the bile duct remains to be fully elucidated. In the present study, a case of bile duct adenoma with low-grade atypia was reported, demonstrating the uptake of 18F-FDG, which was successfully treated by surgical resection.
Case report
A 64-year-old man was admitted to hospital with epigastric discomfort and nausea. He had diabetes mellitus and hypertension, which were controlled by the use of oral medicines. A physical examination revealed normal findings in the patient's abdomen. Laboratory analyses, however, revealed increased levels of total bilirubin (40.4 µmol/l), direct bilirubin (21.0 µmol/l), alkaline phosphatase (507 units/l), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (364 units/l), aspartate aminotransferase (1,578 units/l) and alanine aminotransferase (1,132 units/l). Tumor markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, were shown to be within the normal range. Computerized tomography (CT) revealed a slight dilation of the CBD, with the identification of a mass in the distal CBD (Fig. 1A). Following a diagnosis of obstructive jaundice, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage was performed after the admission of the patient. Radiological examinations revealed the presence of a 25 mm fixed filling defect in the distal CBD, and intraductal ultrasonography revealed an isoechoic, and partially high echoic, mass (Figs. 1B and C). A biopsy of this lesion revealed the presence of tubular adenoma with low-grade atypia. 18F-FDG PET demonstrated an accumulation of focal increased tracer in this lesion, with a maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of 3.3, and the position where uptake of the 18F-FDG occurred was separate from the drainage tube (Fig. 1D).
On the basis of these findings, a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy and regional lymph-node dissection were performed. The tumor was impacted in the bile duct lumen, occupying 2.5 cm in length (Fig. 2A). Histological examinations revealed that the tumor was composed of relatively uniform tubules, with a bland cellular appearance. Neither necrotic foci nor mitotic figures were observed. Furthermore, invasion was not observed in the duct wall, and no intraductal mass was identified (Fig. 2B and C). Lymph node metastasis was not detected. A grade B pancreatic fistula was identified following the surgery, although the patient was discharged 40 days post-surgery. The patient remains alive, with no evidence of any recurrence of the tumor, 15 months following the surgery.
Discussion
Benign tumors arising from the extrahepatic biliary tree are very rare, and are reported to occupy 6% of all tumors of the bile ducts (2). In benign tumors, adenomas and papillomas are commonly encountered. Adenomas arise from the epithelial lining of the biliary duct, and grow in a tubular, papillary or a tubulopapillary manner. Adenomas of the bile duct are considered to be premalignant tumors. The adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence has been well established to occur in the colon and the rectum, and this also applies in the ampullary region (7–10). In carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, adenomatous areas were revealed to co-exist with high frequency in >40% of the surgically resected specimens (11,12). Previously, IPNB have been proposed to be the biliary counterpart of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (3,4). IPNB are a major intraductal neoplasm, which is capable of progressing to an invasive carcinoma, and the types of cytoarchitectural atypia in IPNB were characterized as adenoma, borderline, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma (3). The development of IPNB was reported to follow an adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence, which correlated with the stepwise activation of common oncogenic pathways, including mutated Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, the overexpression of tumor protein 53 and loss of p16 (13). Kim et al (1) summarized the 26 cases of adenomas arising from CBD, and reported that the histological findings ranged from adenoma without atypia to carcinoma in situ with an adenoma component. Therefore, complete resection of the lesion is required in order to avoid the postoperative development of bile duct carcinoma.
Appropriate modalities to resect CBD adenoma have not been clearly defined. Endoscopic resection for bile duct adenoma has been infrequently reported, and the technique is considered to be applicable only in a limited number of situations, for example, for patients for whom surgical resection would pose a high risk (14,15). Local resection of the CBD may be performed if the distal and proximal cut ends are free from the tumor and the tumor is diagnosed to be benign. If the extent of the bile duct adenoma occupies a range which reaches to the distal CBD and local resection is impossible, pancreatoduodenectomy should be considered for complete resection. In adenoma of the bile duct, predicting the presence of malignant foci preoperatively may be difficult. Kim et al (1) reported that radical resection may be required in cases where the size of the adenoma was >~20 mm, or where malignant transformation was suspected. In the present case study, the tumor was located in the distal bile duct in the pancreas, and consequently, pancreaticoduodectomy was selected as the procedure, not bile duct resection. Based on the results obtained from the 18F-FDG PET, the regional lymph node was also dissected. Had the results of the 18F-FDG PET proven to be negative, lymph node dissection would not have been necessary.
18F-FDG PET has been applied in clinical practice to detect a wide variety of tumor types, including lymphoma, lung, esophageal, colon and bile duct cancer (16–19). For patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 18F-FDG PET may be used in the diagnosis and staging of the patients (6,20). Furthermore, Choi EK et al (21) reported that the SUVmax value identified from PET-CT scans is a useful parameter to enable the differentiation of an extrahepatic biliary malignancy from benign disease. In the meta-analysis, Annunziata et al (22) reported that the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET were 76 and 74%, respectively, for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Several previous studies reported that false-negative results obtained in cases of 18F-FDG PET were due to the morphology of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (20,23). Infiltrative types of cholangiocarcinoma led to discrepancies in the diagnostic performance due to an insufficient uptake of FDG in the tumor. However, an explanation of how an uptake of FDG was observed with benign biliary tumors was not forthcoming, and neither was it discussed. 18F-FDG PET detects premalignant colonic adenomas, and a focal FDG accumulation is detected in >50% of reported cases (24). The degree of FDG uptake was reported to be correlated with the size of the adenoma, or to the degree of dysplasia (25). For results obtained from 18F-FDG-PET of the bile duct adenoma, Dong et al (26) reported two cases of IPNB, with uptake of FDG, in 2012. Histological findings revealed that these cases were adenomas, with a high-grade dysplasia in one case, and a low-grade dysplasia in the other. The authors reported that the reason for an uptake of FDG in the adenoma was, primarily, high-mitotic activity across the entire range, from low-grade to high-grade dysplasia, and, secondly, the larger tumor size, composed of a greater number of tumor cells (26). In the present case study, the adenoma was 25 mm in diameter with low-grade atypia, and it was hypothesized that the tumor size of the adenoma and the histological grade of atypia correlated with the extent of FDG accumulation.
False-positive results obtained with FDG uptake which are due to inflammatory causes are well recognized. Wakabayashi et al (27) reported that, in diagnosing malignant diseases in patients with biliary stricture, FDG-PET was superior as a method compared with CT examination in terms of both the sensitivity and the specificity, and superior to cytological examination of the bile in terms of its sensitivity. Anderson et al (28) described a false-positive result in a patient scanned following a cholecystectomy, with FDG uptake identified during the analysis of residual post-operative inflammatory changes. In the present case study, the bile duct drainage tube for obstructive jaundice was already inserted at the time of PET scan. In a previous report, Choi et al (21) evaluated the clinical value of 18F-FDG PET for differentiating extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from benign disease. In that study, the final diagnosis was of cholangiocarcinoma in 34 patients, and of benign disease in five other patients. Of all 39 patients studied, 20 of them had either an endoscopic or external biliary drainage tube, or a biliary stent, at the time of the PET scan. Only one patient was false-positive, with a hyperplastic polyp in the ampulla of Vater, and the update of FDG was correlated with the drainage tube. In the present case study, the site of FDG uptake was observed to be separate from that of the drainage tube. In addition, Kitamura et al (18) examined the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in extrahepatic bile duct cancers. The authors reported that no significant correlation was identified between FDG uptake and the presence of a biliary drainage tube, or the levels of C-reactive protein. Therefore, it was not possible to conclude that the presence of the biliary drainage tube did not affect the measurement of FDG uptake.
In conclusion, a case of bile duct adenoma with low-grade atypia showing FDG uptake has been reported in the present study. 18F-FDG PET may be used to detect premalignant tumors of the bile duct, although whether 18F-FDG PET is able to differentially discriminate between diagnoses of adenoma and carcinoma of the bile duct remains to be fully elucidated, and the assessment of further case studies is required.
References
Kim BS, Joo SH and Joo KR: Carcinoma in situ arising in a tubulovillous adenoma of the distal common bile duct: A case report. World J Gastroenterol. 14:4705–4708. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fletcher ND, Wise PE and Sharp KW: Common bile duct papillary adenoma causing obstructive jaundice: Case report and review of the literature. Am Surg. 70:448–452. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
Abraham SC, Lee JH, Hruban RH, Argani P, Furth EE and Wu TT: Molecular and immunohistochemical analysis of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the biliary tract. Hum Pathol. 34:902–910. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zen Y, Fujii T, Itatsu K, Nakamura K, Minato H, Kasashima S, Kurumaya H, Katayanagi K, Kawashima A, Masuda S, et al: Biliary papillary tumors share pathological features with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Hepatology. 44:1333–1343. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim KM, Lee JK, Shin JU, Lee KH, Lee KT, Sung JY, Jang KT, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW and Lim JH: Clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct according to histologic subtype. Am J Gastroenterol. 107:118–125. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kluge R, Schmidt F, Caca K, Barthel H, Hesse S, Georgi P, Seese A, Huster D and Berr F: Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose for diagnosis and staging of bile duct cancer. Hepatology. 33:1029–1035. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hasebe T, Sakamoto M, Mukai K, Kawano N, Konishi M, Ryu M, Fukamachi S and Hirohashi S: Cholangiocarcinoma arising in bile duct adenoma with focal area of bile duct hamartoma. Virchows Arch. 426:209–213. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Serafini FM and Carey LC: Adenoma of the ampulla of Vater: A genetic condition? HPB Surg. 11:191–193. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sato T, Konishi K, Kimura H, Maeda K, Yabushita K, Tsuji M and Miwa A: Adenoma and tiny carcinoma in adenoma of the papilla of Vater - p53 and PCNA. Hepatogastroenterology. 46:1959–1962. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Genc H, Haciyanli M, Tavusbay C, Colakoglu O, Aksöz K, Unsal B and Ekinci N: Carcinoma arising from villous adenoma of the ampullary bile duct: Report of a case. Surg Today. 37:165–168. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takashima M, Ueki T, Nagai E, Yao T, Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M and Tsuneyoshi M: Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater associated with or without adenoma: A clinicopathologic analysis of 198 cases with reference to p53 and Ki-67 immunohistochemical expressions. Mod Pathol. 13:1300–1307. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaiser A, Jurowich C, Schönekäs H, Gebhardt C and Wünsch PH: The adenoma-carcinoma sequence applies to epithelial tumours of the papilla of Vater. Z Gastroenterol. 40:913–920. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schlitter AM, Born D, Bettstetter M, Specht K, Kim-Fuchs C, Riener MO, Jeliazkova P, Sipos B, Siveke JT, Terris B, et al: Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct: Stepwise progression to carcinoma involves common molecular pathways. Mod Pathol. 27:73–86. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sturgis TM, Fromkes JJ and Marsh W Jr: Adenoma of the common bile duct: Endoscopic diagnosis and resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 38:504–506. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Munshi AG and Hassan MA: Common bile duct adenoma: Case report and brief review of literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 20:e193–e194. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kubota K: From tumor biology to clinical Pet: A review of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology. Ann Nucl Med. 15:471–486. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bomanji JB, Costa DC and Ell PJ: Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2:157–164. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kitamura K, Hatano E, Higashi T, Seo S, Nakamoto Y, Narita M, Taura K, Yasuchika K, Nitta T, Yamanaka K, et al: Prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 18:39–46. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yamada H, Hosokawa M, Itoh K, Takenouchi T, Kinoshita Y, Kikkawa T, Sakashita K, Uemura S, Nishida Y, Kusumi T and Sasaki S: Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Today. 44:1258–1265. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Kimura N, Miki A, Sasakawa Y, Wakabayashi H and Ohkawa M: Comparison of early and delayed FDG PET for evaluation of biliary stricture. Nucl Med Commun. 28:914–919. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Choi EK, Yoo IeR, Kim SH, O JH, Choi WH, Na SJ and Park SY: The clinical value of dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT for differentiating extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from benign disease. Clin Nucl Med. 38:e106–e111. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Annunziata S, Caldarella C, Pizzuto DA, Galiandro F, Sadeghi R, Giovanella L and Treglia G: Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of the primary tumor in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2014:2476932014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Albazaz R, Patel CN, Chowdhury FU and Scarsbrook AF: Clinical impact of FDG PET-CT on management decisions for patients with primary biliary tumours. Insights Imaging. 4:691–700. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van Kouwen MC, Nagengast FM, Jansen JB, Oyen WJ and Drenth JP: 2-(18F)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography detects clinical relevant adenomas of the colon: A prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 23:3713–3717. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yasuda S, Fujii H, Nakahara T, Nishiumi N, Takahashi W, Ide M and Shohtsu A: 18F-FDG PET detection of colonic adenomas. J Nucl Med. 42:989–992. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Dong A, Dong H, Zhang L and Zuo C: F-18 FDG uptake in borderline intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct. Ann Nucl Med. 26:594–598. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wakabayashi H, Akamoto S, Yachida S, Okano K, Izuishi K, Nishiyama Y and Maeta H: Significance of fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the diagnosis of malignancies in patients with biliary stricture. Eur J Surg Oncol. 31:1175–1179. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Anderson CD, Rice MH, Pinson CW, Chapman WC, Chari RS and Delbeke D: Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 8:90–97. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |