Suppression of human breast cancer cells by tectorigenin through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases and MAPK signaling in vitro

  • Authors:
    • Linwen Zeng
    • Shaofeng Yuan
    • Jianliang Shen
    • Ming Wu
    • Liangming Pan
    • Xiangdong Kong
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 19, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.8313
  • Pages: 3935-3943
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Breast cancer is a major life‑threatening malignancy and is the second highest cause of mortality. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of tectorigenin (Tec), a Traditional Chinese Medicine, against human breast cancer cells in vitro. MDA‑MB‑231 and MCF‑7 human breast cancer cells were treated with various concentrations of Tec. Cell proliferation was evaluated using the Cell Counting kit‑8 assay, and apoptosis and the cell cycle were examined by flow cytometry. The migratory and invasive abilities of these cells were detected by Transwell and Matrigel assays, respectively. Metastasis‑, apoptosis‑ and survival‑related gene expression levels were measured by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. The results indicated that Tec was able to inhibit the proliferation of MDA‑MB‑231 and MCF‑7 cells in a dose‑ and time‑dependent manner. Furthermore, Tec treatment induced apoptosis and G0/G1‑phase arrest, and inhibited cell migration and invasion. Tec treatment decreased the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‑2, MMP9, BCL‑2, phosphorylated‑AKT and components of the mitogen‑activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, and increased the expression of BCL‑2‑associated X, cleaved poly [ADP‑ribose] polymerase and cleaved caspase‑3. In conclusion, Tec treatment suppressed human breast cancer cells through the downregulation of AKT and MAPK signaling and the upregulated expression and/or activity of the caspase family in vitro. Therefore, Tec may be a potential therapeutic drug to treat human breast cancer.

Introduction

Breast cancer is a major life-threatening malignancy and ranks as the second leading cause of mortality (1,2). Triple-negative (TN) breast cancer accounts for ~15% of all diagnosed breast cancers. TN breast cancer cells do not express estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor or human epidermal growth factor receptor (3,4). Drug-resistant TN breast cancers have a poor prognosis, as they metastasize rapidly and are difficult to treat (5). MDA-MB-231 TN breast cancer cells are aggressive, invasive and resistant to a number of anticancer agents (6). On this basis, MDA-MB-231 cells provide an ideal in vitro model in which to analyze the effects of anticancer treatments, such as with tectorigenin (Tec). MCF-7 cells are an estrogen-responsive breast cancer cell line, which was used to confirm the inhibitory effects of Tec on cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Chemotherapeutic drugs that inhibit the malignant characteristics of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells would be the best drugs to treat breast cancer.

Experience-based remedies such as Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs) have been derived over many years of clinical use in China. Most TCMs are extracted from at least one medicinal herb and comprise multiple bioactive ingredients, which suggested that TCMs may be a potential source for new anticancer drugs (7). To date, a number of naturally occurring phytochemicals have been reported that exhibit antitumoral effects by inducing apoptosis and have received considerable attention (1,2,4). Tec is an effective component of the TCM that is derived from Belamcanda chinensis (8). Tec has been reported to exhibit beneficial effects in various types of tumors, including osteosarcoma (9), ovarian cancer (10), lung carcinoma (11), hepatocellular carcinoma (12) and promyelocytic leukemia (13). In addition, Tec was revealed to regulate adipogenic differentiation and adipocytokine secretion through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and IκB kinase/nuclear factor-κB signaling (14). In addition, previous studies also reported that Tec affects the proliferation of breast cancer cells (15,16). However, the specific effects and the underlying mechanisms of Tec on apoptosis and metastasis in human breast cancer have not been elucidated.

Based on the present study results, it is hypothesized that Tec may induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells by downregulating the protein expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), phosphorylated (p)-AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling and by upregulating the expression of cleaved caspase (CASP)-3 and cleaved poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) as MMPs, p-AKT, MAPK signaling, cleaved CASP-3 and cleaved PARP have been linked to the apoptosis or metastasis of breast cancer in previous reports (3,4,9,10). Therefore, Tec may be a potential therapeutic drug for human breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Main reagents

Tec was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 200 mM and stored at −20°C. Primary antibodies against MMP2 (cat. no. 87809), MMP9 (cat. no. 13667), BCL-2 (cat. no. 4223), BCL-2-associated X (BAX; cat. no. 5023), p-AKT (cat. no. 4060), total-AKT (cat. no. 4685), p-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; cat. no. 4668), total-JNK (cat. no. 9252), p-p38 (cat. no. 4511), p38 (cat. no. 8690), p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK; cat. no. 4370), total-ERK (cat. no. 4695), cleaved CASP-3 (cat. no. 1050), CASP-3 (cat. no. 14220), cleaved PARP (cat. no. 5625), PARP (cat. no. 9532) and GAPDH (cat. no. 2118) and anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) secondary antibody (DyLight™ 800 4X PEG conjugate; cat. no. 5151) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA).

Cell lines and cell culture

Human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, and the human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) lines were purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) the repository of ATCC cell lines in China. MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and containing <0.05% DMSO, at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. hMSCs were cultured in α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were used within 20 passages, and hMSCs were used within 5 passages.

Measurement of cell viability

Cell viability was measured using the Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8), as previously described (17). Briefly, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells (6,000 cells/well) were plated in a 96-well plate and incubated overnight at 37°C without drug treatment. Subsequently, the cells of the control group (0 µM group) were treated with 0.1% DMSO and the cells in the Tec groups were treated with Tec at concentrations of 0, 50, 100 or 200 µM and incubated at 37°C. The present study used 0–200 µM Tec as the experimental dose according to a pretest study and previously published studies (9,10). Viability was examined every 24 h following treatment (that is, at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h) by incubating the cells with CCK-8 solution at 37°C for 2 h and measuring optical density (OD) at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Electron Corporation; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Each condition included three replicate wells with at least three independent repeats. Cell viability compared to the control was calculated using the following equation: Cell viability (%)=ODdrug-treated group/ODcontrol group. The cell viability of hMSCs was detected using the above methods at 72 and 96 h following Tec treatment. If there were no effect on the cell viability of hMSCs at 72 and 96 h, 24 and 48 h should also demonstrate no effect. As a result, the inhibition of proliferation in MCF-7 was more obvious than in MDA-MB-231 cells, so these were selected to detect the apoptosis, cell cycle and apoptosis-related genes of MDA-MB-231 cells in subsequent experiments.

Apoptosis

Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry using Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) double-immunofluorescence staining kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, MDA-MB-231 cells (1×106 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates and harvested 24 h following treatment with 0, 100 or 200 µM Tec. As 50 µM was far less than IC50 at 24 h in MDA-MB-231 cells, this concentration was removed. The cells were vigorously pipetted and centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C and the supernatants were discarded. Subsequently, the cells were resuspended in 1X Annexin-binding buffer to verify drug-induced apoptosis rates, and apoptotic events were indicated as a combination of FITC+/PI (early apoptotic) and FITC+/PI+ (late apoptotic or dead), and were analyzed using FlowJo version 7.6 (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA). The final results are expressed as the percentage of FITC+ cells after subtracting the number of vehicle cells. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from at least three independent experiments.

Cell cycle analysis

To analyze the effects of Tec on cell cycle, MDA-MB-231 cells (2×106 cells/dish) were seeded in 60 mm culture dishes and treated with 0, 100 or 200 µM Tec for 24 h at 37°C. Cells were harvested, washed twice with PBS and fixed in 70% ice-cold ethanol at −20°C for 2 h, followed by 2 washes with PBS. Cells were resuspended in 300 µl PI/RNase staining buffer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 10 min at room temperature and analyzed using a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The cell cycle distribution was analyzed with the ModFit LT software version 3.0 (BD Biosciences). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from at least three independent experiments.

Tumor cell migration and invasion ability

Cell migration was analyzed using a Transwell assay with 8 µm cell culture inserts (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) in 24-well plates. Untreated and Tec-treated MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells (3×104 cells/well) were suspended in 100 µl of serum-free DMEM and added to the upper Transwell chamber, whereas the lower chamber was filled with 500 µl complete DMEM with 20% FBS. Following incubation for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere, the insert was washed with PBS and cells on the top surface of the insert were removed by wiping with a cotton swab. Cells that migrated to the bottom surface of the insert were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min, stained with 0.1% crystal violet at room temperature for 20 min, and examined using a light microscope (BX43; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Cell counts were based on examination of five random fields from the digital images (magnification, ×200) and reported as the mean ± standard deviation. All assays were repeated three times independently.

The invasion assay procedure was similar to that of the cell migration assay, except that the Transwell membrane was coated with 1:3 diluted Matrigel (BD Biosciences), and the cells were incubated for 32 h at 37°C. All assays were repeated three times independently.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

A total of 24 h post-treatment with different doses of Tec, RNA was extracted from MDA-MB-231 cells (1×106 cells/well) using the TRIzol (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) method and RNA extracted according to the manufacturer's protocol. The concentration and purity were measured by Nanodrop 2000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). The iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was used to synthesize cDNA using the reverse transcription method according to the manufacturer's protocol. mRNA expression levels were evaluated by qPCR using a SYBR Premix ex Taq, Tli RNase H Plus kit (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 34 sec. Primer sequences are listed in Table I. GAPDH was used as an internal control and for normalization of expression. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from at least three independent experiments. Gene expression was compared using the 2−ΔΔCq method (18).

Table I.

Primer sequences used in reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Table I.

Primer sequences used in reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

GenePrimer sequence (5′→3′)
MMP2F: ATGCAGTGGGGGCTTAAGAA
R: AAACAGGTTGCAGCTCTCCT
MMP9F: TCTATGGTCCTCGCCCTGAA
R: CATCGTCCACCGGACTCAAA
AKT1F: GAAGGACGGGAGCAGGC
R: CTCACGCGCTCCTCTCAG
AKT2F: GCCACCATGAATGAGGTGAAT
R: TCTCGTCTGGAGAATCCACG
AKT3F: TTTTCTCTATTATTTGGGCTGAGTC
R: CCCCTCTTCTGAACCCAACC
BCL-2F: ATCTGGGCCACAAGTGAAGT
R: GCTGATTCGACGTTTTGCCT
BAXF: AGAGGTCTTTTTCCGAGTGGC
R: CAGGGACATCAGTCGCTTCAG
CASP-3F: GCTCTGGTTTTCGGTGGGTG
R: CTGAGGTTTGCTGCATCGAC
CASP-8F: CTGGTCTGAAGGCTGGTTGT
R: CAGGCTCAGGAACTTGAGGG
CASP-9F: CAGGCTCAGGAACTTGAGGG
R: TCGACAACTTTGCTGCTTGC
GAPDHF: AATGGGCAGCCGTTAGGAAA
R: GCGCCCAATACGACCAAATC

[i] BAX, BCL-2-associated X; CASP, caspase; F, forward; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; R, reverse.

Western blot analysis

Protein extracts from MDA-MB-231 cells (1×106 cells/well) subjected to various Tec treatments were prepared using 120 µl radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (RIPA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and were quantified using a Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Lysates were diluted 5:1 with loading buffer and heat-denatured at 99°C for 10 min. Equal amounts of protein (30 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE using precast 7.5–12.5% gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., USA) at 80 V for 30 min and 120 V for 1 h. Proteins were transferred onto an activated polyvinylidene fluoride membrane by wet electrophoretic transfer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) for 2.5 h at a constant current of 250 mA. The membranes were blocked for 1 h in TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST) and 5% nonfat milk powder and subsequently incubated overnight with primary antibodies (all antibodies at 1:1,000) at 4°C. Following three washes in TBST, the membranes were probed with the corresponding secondary antibody (1:15,000) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed in TBS, and the protein bands were visualized using an Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Positive immunoreactive bands were densitometrically quantified and normalized to GAPDH. Adobe Photoshop (Creative Suite 5; Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for densitometry. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from at least three independent experiments.

Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the data. Significant differences between experimental groups and controls were assessed using the Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance and LSD test as appropriate. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Proliferation of breast cancer cells and hMSCs following Tec treatment

The structure of Tec is provided in Fig. 1A; molecular weight, 300.26. To investigate the effects of Tec treatment on breast cancer cells, a CCK-8 cell proliferation assay was performed on MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells; no significant differences were identified in hMSCs following 72 or 96 h Tec treatment (Fig. 1B). The proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells was inhibited following treatment with Tec, and the inhibitory effects of Tec on proliferation significantly increased with the increasing Tec concentration in both cell lines, with the strongest effects observed following 96 h treatment (Fig. 1C and D, respectively). The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated (Table II). According to previous studies (9,10) as well as the present IC50 results, it was determined that the concentrations of Tec at 0, 50, 100 and 200 µM were to be used in subsequent experiments. These results indicated that Tec treatment inhibited the proliferation of breast cancer cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner.

Table II.

IC50 calculated for varying incubation periods for tectorigenin treatment on two breast cancer cell lines.

Table II.

IC50 calculated for varying incubation periods for tectorigenin treatment on two breast cancer cell lines.

IC50 (µM)

Cell line24 h48 h72 h96 h
MDA-MB-231417.4283.9184.277.4
MCF-7276.8118.4   55.3623.65

[i] IC50, inhibitory concentration 50%.

Tec-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of MDA-MB-231 cells

Flow cytometry was used to detect Tec-induced apoptosis. Treatments with 100 and 200 µM Tec significantly increased the total apoptotic rates (18.5 and 29.97%, respectively) compared with the apoptotic rate in untreated control cells (3.28%; P<0.05; Fig. 2A and B); quantitative data for early and late apoptosis rate were consistent with this phenomenon (Fig. 2B). The cell cycle was also examined by flow cytometry following PI staining. Tec treatments significantly increased the proportion of G0/G1-phase cells and significantly decreased the proportion of S-phase and G2/M cells (Fig. 2C and D), which suggested that Tec treatment may induce G0/G1-phase arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells. These results indicated that the inhibitory function of Tec may be through activating the apoptosis pathway and G0/G1-phase arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells.

Tec treatment impairs migration and invasion of breast cancer cells and inhibits the expression of metastasis-related genes

Cell migration and invasion were examined using Transwell and Matrigel assays, respectively, following treatment with different concentrations of Tec. The results revealed that the migratory and invasive abilities of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were inhibited by Tec in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A and B, respectively). In addition, the mRNA expression levels of MMP2 and MMP9 were inhibited by Tec treatment in a dose-dependent manner in both MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells (Fig. 3C). As the metastasis ability of MDA-MB-231 is stronger than MCF-7 cells (1,4), western blotting analysis was not performed for MMP expressions in MCF-7 cells. The inhibitory effects of Tec on the protein expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in MDA-MB-231 cells were confirmed (Fig. 3D). These results indicated that Tec may impair migration and invasion of breast cancer by suppressing MMP2 and MMP9 expression.

Apoptosis- and survival-related gene expression

To investigate the molecular mechanisms of the inhibitory effects of Tec in MDA-MB-231 cells, RT-qPCR was used to examine the variation in apoptosis- and survival-related gene expression levels. The mRNA expression levels of BCL-2, AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3 were reduced in Tec-treated MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A-D, respectively), whereas the expression levels of BAX, CASP-3, CASP-8 and CASP-9 were upregulated (Fig. 4E-H, respectively). These results suggested that these genes may be potential downstream targets of Tec in breast cancer treatment.

Tec treatment regulates the expression of apoptosis-related proteins and components of the MAPK signaling pathway

Western blotting was used to analyze protein expression levels of apoptosis-related proteins and components of the MAPK signaling pathway in MDA-MB-231 cells following different concentrations of Tec treatment. The results demonstrated that Tec treatment inhibited the protein expression of MAPK signaling proteins p-p38, p-JNK and p-ERK in (Fig. 5A and B). Tec treatment also suppressed the expression of BCL-2 and p-AKT in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5C and D). However, Tec treatment led to increased expression levels of BAX, cleaved PARP and cleaved CASP-3 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5C-E). These data suggested that Tec treatment induced apoptosis of breast cancer cells through suppression of the MAPK pathway and by activation of CASP-3 dependent apoptosis.

Discussion

Although the current first-line therapies for breast cancer, which include surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, have allowed for great achievements in clinical control, poor prognosis and serious side effects remain and must be addressed (1924). Another primary problem of treatments for breast cancer is a high incidence of failure and relapse with drug resistance (46). Therefore, an increasing number of studies are exploring more efficient treatments for breast cancer, in which developing new drug treatments is a primary goal (1). TCMs may offer a primary source for the discovery of new anticancer drugs (25), and anticancer agents extracted from Chinese herbs have attracted further attention. For example, one recent study reported that Polyporus umbellatus including its ingredients ergosta-4,6,8 (14), 22-tetraen-3-one and polyporusterone A-G inhibited breast tumor cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis by downregulating AKT expression (26). Another recent study reported that emodin, a rhubarb-derived compound, inhibited breast cancer growth and metastasis (27).

Tec is one of the bioactive components that is purified from the Chinese herb Belamcanda chinensis that has been investigated in the treatment of certain cancers; a number of pharmacological effects have been identified (28,29), which indicated that Tec may be an effective option for the treatment of breast cancer. The function and underlying mechanisms of Tec in breast cancer are not fully understood. To further investigate its potential clinical application, the present study examined the effects of Tec treatment on the proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, migration and invasion ability in human breast cancer cells in vitro.

The result demonstrated that up to Tec treatments did not influence the proliferation of hMSCs, whereas culturing MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells with various concentrations inhibited their proliferation. Tec treatment also induced MDA-MB-231 cell apoptosis and G0/G1-phase arrest in a dose-dependent manner. The migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were also inhibited by Tec in a dose-dependent manner probably through the suppression of MMP2 and MMP9 expression. These data indicated that Tec may be able to serve as an efficient chemotherapy drug for breast cancer treatment. However, a number of previous studies have reported that Tec stimulated the proliferation of MCF-7 and T-47D human breast cancer cells (15,16). The present study suspected that the reason for this discrepancy is that a different number of cells used; for example, in the present study the CCK-8 assay used 6,000 cells/well, whereas the previous studies used 1×104 cells/well. Another possible reason may be that the highest concentration of Tec in the previous studies was 100 µM while the maximum concentration used in the present study was 200 µM, and the inhibition of the proliferation of tumor cells was not demonstrated in previous studies (15,16); therefore, the inhibitory effects of Tec may not be obvious in these studies. The inhibitory effects of Tec in other tumors of epithelial origin, such as prostate cancer (30) and hepatocellular carcinoma (12), have been confirmed in other previous studies, and Tec treatment has now been confirmed to inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer cells by the present study.

The molecular mechanisms of Tec treatment on breast cancer cells were explored. Breast cancer cells often express continued active survival and signaling pathways, such as AKT and MAPK signaling, as well as gene mutation, rearrangements and chromosomal translocation in other signaling pathways (3133). The survival-signaling pathway serves an important role in proliferation, tumorigenesis, anti-apoptosis and drug resistance (34,35). The more constitutively active the survival signaling pathways are in breast cancer, the poorer is the prognosis (9). Apoptosis is an important mode of cell death during tumor chemotherapy. The caspase pathway is usually involved in the process of apoptosis, and CASP-3 is the main apoptogenic protein downstream of the mitochondrial apoptosis signaling pathways (17); it cleaves various key cellular substrates, therefore resulting in apoptosis (36). Cleavage of PARP is another defining characteristic of apoptosis, and serves a pivotal role in it (37). Heavy DNA damage usually results from apoptosis stimuli, which elicits a major increase in PARP activity, which rapidly depletes cellular levels of nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (NAD)+ and ATP (38). Efforts to resynthesize NAD+ increase ATP consumption, which leads to an energy crisis that results in cell apoptosis (39). Members of the BCL-2 protein family are key regulators of apoptosis, and the BCL-2/BAX ratio is a key determinant of apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway (40). The present results indicated that the expression of BCL-2 was downregulated, whereas BAX expression was upregulated in breast cancer cells following treatment with Tec. These data also demonstrated that Tec treatment enhanced CASP-3, CASP-8, CASP-9 and PARP activity in a dose-dependent manner, which indicated that the mitochondrial apoptosis signaling pathway may be involved in breast cancer cell apoptosis induced by Tec. The MAPK and AKT signaling pathways are two main pathways that regulate cell proliferation in breast cancer (3135). The present results demonstrated that both AKT and MAPK signal transduction pathways were suppressed simultaneously in Tec-treated breast cancer cells. It was hypothesized that Tec, by inhibiting the activation of AKT and MAPK pathways and promoting activation of the caspase family, may create a more effective response in antitumor therapy, as the inhibitor simultaneously targets three pathways in breast cancer cells. Tec may be more effective compared with specific inhibitors that have a single target for the treatment of breast cancer because drug resistance frequently emerges under single target treatments due to hyperactivation of alternative signaling pathways. In the present study, Tec treatment exhibited multi-targeted characteristics, and it is expected that resistance to Tec in breast cancer may occur rarely, response to Tec may be higher and the response duration may be longer.

Results from the present study have demonstrated the role of Tec in restricting proliferation, migration and invasion, and inducing apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. It was also revealed that Tec may indirectly or directly affect the vitality of AKT survival signaling, MAPK signaling and caspase-related apoptosis signaling, which are key regulators of cell survival and apoptosis during breast cancer treatment. However, further investigations should be conducted to better determine the in-depth molecular mechanisms controlling Tec-mediated effects on cell survival and apoptosis-related signaling pathways. In addition, animal experiments should be constructed to verify the therapeutic effect of Tec in vivo, and the present results should be verified by patient treatment trials.

In conclusion, the present study revealed the biological response of human breast cancer cells to a novel traditional Chinese herb Tec. It is suggested that Tec may induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells by downregulating the protein expression of p-AKT, BCL-2 and the MAPK pathway, and by upregulating the expression of cleaved CASP-3, cleaved PARP and BAX. In addition, Tec may be a potential therapeutic drug for human breast cancer. However, future work needs to be performed in additional cell lines to confirm these results for this molecule to be used in the clinic.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by The Health System ‘Outstanding Young Talent’ Cultivation Plan of Shanghai Jinshan District (grant no. JSYQ201620 to Xiangdong Kong), The Science and Technology Innovation Fund Projects of Shanghai Jinshan District (grant no. 2015-3-24 to Xiangdong Kong) and The Medical Subject Construction Fund Project of Shanghai Jinshan District (grant no. JSZK2015B06 to Ming Wu).

References

1 

Kwak JH, Park JY, Lee D, Kwak JY, Park EH, Kim KH, Park HJ, Kim HY, Jang HJ, Ham J, et al: Inhibitory effects of ginseng sapogenins on the proliferation of triple negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 24:5409–5412. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Wang P, Du X, Xiong M, Cui J, Yang Q, Wang W, Chen Y and Zhang T: Ginsenoside Rd attenuates breast cancer metastasis implicating derepressing microRNA-18a-regulated Smad2 expression. Sci Rep. 6:337092016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Jia Y, Wang X, Liu Q, Leung AW, Wang P and Xu C: Sonodynamic action of hypocrellin B triggers cell apoptosis of breast cancer cells involving caspase pathway. Ultrasonics. 73:154–161. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Qiao H, Wang TY, Yan W, Qin A, Fan QM, Han XG, Wang YG and Tang TT: Synergistic suppression of human breast cancer cells by combination of plumbagin and zoledronic acid in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 36:1085–1098. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

He J, Du L, Bao M, Zhang B, Qian H, Zhou Q and Cao Z: Oroxin A inhibits breast cancer cell growth by inducing robust endoplasmic reticulum stress and senescence. Anti-cancer Drugs. 27:204–215. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, Symmans WF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hennessy B, Green M, et al: Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26:1275–1281. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Qu Z, Cui J, Harata-Lee Y, Aung TN, Feng Q, Raison JM, Kortschak RD and Adelson DL: Identification of candidate anti-cancer molecular mechanisms of compound kushen injection using functional genomics. Oncotarget. 7:66003–66019. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Zhang Y, He L, Yue S, Huang Q, Zhang Y and Yang J: Characterization and evaluation of a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system containing tectorigenin, an isoflavone with low aqueous solubility and poor permeability. Drug Deliv. 24:632–640. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Guo Y, Chen YH, Cheng ZH, Ou-Yang HN, Luo C and Guo ZL: Tectorigenin inhibits osteosarcoma cell migration through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases in vitro. Anticancer Drugs. 27:540–546. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Yang YI, Lee KT, Park HJ, Kim TJ, Choi YS, Shih Ie M and Choi JH: Tectorigenin sensitizes paclitaxel-resistant human ovarian cancer cells through downregulation of the Akt and NFκB pathway. Carcinogenesis. 33:2488–2498. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Amin A, Mokhdomi TA, Bukhari S, Wani SH, Wafai AH, Lone GN, Qadri A and Qadri RA: Tectorigenin ablates the inflammation-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in a co-culture model of human lung carcinoma. Pharmacol Rep. 67:382–387. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Jiang CP, Ding H, Shi DH, Wang YR, Li EG and Wu JH: Pro-apoptotic effects of tectorigenin on human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. World J Gastroenterol. 18:1753–1764. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lee KT, Sohn IC, Kim YK, Choi JH, Choi JW, Park HJ, Itoh Y and Miyamoto K: Tectorigenin, an isoflavone of Pueraria thunbergiana Benth., induces differentiation and apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 24:1117–1121. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Li QY, Chen L, Yan MM, Shi XJ and Zhong MK: Tectorigenin regulates adipogenic differentiation and adipocytokines secretion via PPARγ and IKK/NF-κB signaling. Pharm Biol. 53:1567–1575. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Monthakantirat O, De-Eknamkul W, Umehara K, Yoshinaga Y, Miyase T, Warashina T and Noguchi H: Phenolic constituents of the rhizomes of the Thai medicinal plant Belamcanda chinensis with proliferative activity for two breast cancer cell lines. J Nat Prod. 68:361–364. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Umehara K, Nemoto K, Matsushita A, Terada E, Monthakantirat O, De-Eknamkul W, Miyase T, Warashina T, Degawa M and Noguchi H: Flavonoids from the heartwood of the Thai medicinal plant Dalbergia parviflora and their effects on estrogenic-responsive human breast cancer cells. J Nat Prod. 72:2163–2168. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Han XG, Li Y, Mo HM, Li K, Lin D, Zhao CQ, Zhao J and Tang TT: TIMP3 regulates osteosarcoma cell migration, invasion and chemotherapeutic resistances. Tumour Biol. 37:8857–8867. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Fang C, Wang FB, Li Y and Zeng XT: Down-regulation of miR-199b-5p is correlated with poor prognosis for breast cancer patients. Biomed Pharmacother. 84:1189–1193. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Chlebowski RT, Pan K and Col NF: Ovarian suppression in combination endocrine adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 161:185–190. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Kong X, Li Z and Li X: GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms as predictors of response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 78:1163–1173. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Sun S, Wang F, Dou H, Zhang L and Li J: Preventive effect of zoledronic acid on aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss for postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant letrozole. Onco Targets Ther. 9:6029–6036. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Meng L, Xu Y, Xu C and Zhang W: Biomarker discovery to improve prediction of breast cancer survival: Using gene expression profiling, meta-analysis and tissue validation. Onco Targets Ther. 9:6177–6185. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Fleisher B, Clarke C and Ait-Oudhia S: Current advances in biomarkers for targeted therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 8:183–197. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Wang X, Xia X, Leung AW, Xiang J, Jiang Y, Wang P, Xu J, Yu H, Bai D and Xu C: Ultrasound induces cellular destruction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells in the presence of curcumin. Ultrasonics. 51:165–170. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Tan XL, Guo L and Wang GH: Polyporus umbellatus inhibited tumor cell proliferation and promoted tumor cell apoptosis by down-regulating AKT in breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 83:526–535. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Iwanowycz S, Wang J, Hodge J, Wang Y, Yu F and Fan D: Emodin inhibits breast cancer growth by blocking the tumor-promoting feedforward loop between cancer cells and macrophages. Mol Cancer Ther. 15:1931–1942. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kapoor S: Tectorigenin and its inhibitory effects on tumor growth in systemic malignancies. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 35:5332013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Ha le M, Que do TN, Huyen do TT, Long PQ and Dat NT: Toxicity, analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of tectorigenin. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 35:336–340. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Thelen P, Scharf JG, Burfeind P, Hemmerlein B, Wuttke W, Spengler B, Christoffel V, Ringert RH and Seidlová-Wuttke D: Tectorigenin and other phytochemicals extracted from leopard lily Belamcanda chinensis affect new and established targets for therapies in prostate cancer. Carcinogenesis. 26:1360–1367. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Ho JY, Hsu RJ, Liu JM, Chen SC, Liao GS, Gao HW and Yu CP: MicroRNA-382-5p aggravates breast cancer progression by regulating the RERG/Ras/ERK signaling axis. Oncotarget. 8:22443–22459. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Wang D, Wu P, Wang H, Zhu L, Zhao W and Lu Y: SIN1 promotes the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells by Akt activation. Biosci Rep. 36:e004242016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Wang H, Jia XH, Chen JR, Yi YJ, Wang JY, Li YJ and Xie SY: HOXB4 knockdown reverses multidrug resistance of human myelogenous leukemia K562/ADM cells by downregulating P-gp, MRP1 and BCRP expression via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 49:2529–2537. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Aghazadeh S and Yazdanparast R: Mycophenolic acid potentiates HER2-overexpressing SKBR3 breast cancer cell line to induce apoptosis: Involvement of AKT/FOXO1 and JAK2/STAT3 pathways. Apoptosis. 21:1302–1314. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Zhang Z, Liu L, Liu C, Cao S, Zhu Y and Mei Q: TIPE2 suppresses the tumorigenesis, growth and metastasis of breast cancer via inhibition of the AKT and p38 signaling pathways. Oncol Rep. 36:3311–3316. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Din TA, Seeni A, Yusoff MS, Shamsuddin S and Jaafar H: PF4-Induced apoptosis in breast cancer in vivo study: The role of the caspases family. Pathology. 48 Suppl 1:S1222016. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Lazebnik YA, Kaufmann SH, Desnoyers S, Poirier GG and Earnshaw WC: Cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase by a proteinase with properties like ICE. Nature. 371:346–347. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Soldani C and Scovassi AI: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 cleavage during apoptosis: An update. Apoptosis. 7:321–328. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Bhaskara VK, Panigrahi M, Challa S and Babu PP: Comparative status of activated ERK1/2 and PARP cleavage in human gliomas. Neuropathology. 25:48–53. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Sharifi S, Barar J, Hejazi MS and Samadi N: Roles of the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, caspase-8 and 9 in resistance of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 15:8617–8622. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2018
Volume 17 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zeng L, Yuan S, Shen J, Wu M, Pan L and Kong X: Suppression of human breast cancer cells by tectorigenin through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases and MAPK signaling in vitro. Mol Med Rep 17: 3935-3943, 2018
APA
Zeng, L., Yuan, S., Shen, J., Wu, M., Pan, L., & Kong, X. (2018). Suppression of human breast cancer cells by tectorigenin through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases and MAPK signaling in vitro. Molecular Medicine Reports, 17, 3935-3943. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.8313
MLA
Zeng, L., Yuan, S., Shen, J., Wu, M., Pan, L., Kong, X."Suppression of human breast cancer cells by tectorigenin through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases and MAPK signaling in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 17.3 (2018): 3935-3943.
Chicago
Zeng, L., Yuan, S., Shen, J., Wu, M., Pan, L., Kong, X."Suppression of human breast cancer cells by tectorigenin through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases and MAPK signaling in vitro". Molecular Medicine Reports 17, no. 3 (2018): 3935-3943. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.8313