Serum PGLYRP‑1 is a highly discriminatory biomarker for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 8, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9632
- Pages: 589-594
Abstract
Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an autoimmune disease, presents as a chronic and systemic inflammatory disorder that affects a number of tissues and organs; however, it frequently attacks synovial joints and leads to systemic bone loss due to excessive osteoclast activity (1,2). In addition, 0.5–1% of the global population suffers from RA (3,4). Early diagnosis and proper treatment may prevent severe disease manifestations in patients with RA (5). However, current diagnostic methods demonstrate various insufficiencies in the early diagnosis of RA, reflecting the need to investigate novel biomarkers that may contribute to improved diagnosis and prognosis.
Peptidoglycan recognition protein-1 (PGLYRP-1; previously termed PGRP-S) is one of the four types of peptidoglycan recognition proteins in humans that is primarily expressed in polymorphonuclear leukocyte granules (6,7). In addition, PGLYRP-1 is a secreted and circulating protein that binds peptidoglycan and promotes inflammation through the activation of innate immune mechanisms (8). A number of studies have demonstrated that an imbalance between the adaptive and innate immune systems driving excessive immune responses is involved in the pathogenesis of RA (9–11). Furthermore, Fodil et al (12) reported that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of Pglyrp1 were associated with RA. However, limited data are available regarding the potential role of Pglyrp1/PGLYRP-1 in RA.
In the present study, it was hypothesized that the plasma levels of PGLYRP-1, reflecting inflammation, may be associated with RA. This hypothesis was tested by measuring the expression of PGLYRP-1 in the serum and to determine whether PGLYRP-1 in the serum may be used as a novel biomarker for RA diagnosis.
Patients and methods
Patient variables
A total of 62 patients (age, 56.54±11.98 years; 13 males) who fulfilled the revised American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA (13) were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China) between November 2015 and September 2017. The Pglyrp1 mRNA expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the PGLYRP-1 levels in the serum were simultaneously determined in 22 patients. A further 22 patients were employed to detect the Pglyrp1 mRNA level in PBMCs solely because of the limited serum samples and 18 patients were engaged to identify the PGLYRP-1 level in the serum also solely because of the limited PBMCs samples. In total, 44 specimens [6 from patients with novel-onset RA (14)] were used to detect the Pglyrp1 mRNA expression level in PBMCs and 40 specimens (6 cases of novel-onset RA) were used to identify the PGLYRP-1 level in the serum. The characteristics of the RA patients (44 specimens for detecting the Pglyrp1 gene and 40 specimens for detecting the PGLYRP-1 protein) are presented in Table I. The RA disease activity was measured using the disease activity score 28 (DAS28) (15). In addition, the present study included 91 healthy controls (HCs; age, 53.76±14.39 years; 14 males, 77 females) who were unrelated to the patients and did not have inflammatory or autoimmune diseases. Among them, 51 HCs were employed to detect Pglyrp1 in PBMCs and 40 HCs were engaged to detect PGLYRP-1 in the serum. RA and HC cases were age- and sex-matched. As an autoimmune disease control, 41 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; age, 38.61±12.60 years; 3 males, 38 females) who fulfilled the revised American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE (16) were also enrolled at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2017 and September 2017. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (ethical approval no. 019) and was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants also signed informed consent forms.
PBMC preparation and total RNA extraction
PBMCs were isolated from 2 ml EDTA-anticoagulated blood from each donor using Ficoll-Hypaque density gradients (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at 25°C. The cells were frozen in TRIzol® (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at a concentration of 106/ml and stored at −80°C. Total RNA was extracted from PBMCs using TRIzol reagent, according to the manufacturer's protocol. The concentration and quality of the RNA were assessed by absorbance spectrometry ratios of A260/A280 and A260/A230 using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Reverse transcription quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis
Total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). RT assay was set at an initial denaturation step of 37°C for 15 min, followed by 85°C for 5 sec. The qPCR was performed on an ABI 7500 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara Bio, Inc.) in 10-µl reactions containing 1X SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix, 0.4 µM of each specific forward and reverse primer, and 0.5 µl cDNA template. The PCR assay had an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and at 60°C for 1 min, and melt curves were detected to confirm the specificity of amplification and the lack of primer dimers. The primers used in RT-qPCR are presented in Table II. Furthermore, β-actin was used as an internal control. Following the reactions, the Cq values were determined using the fixed threshold settings.
Table II.Specific gene primers used for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. |
The relative expression levels of Pglyrp1 were calculated using the 2−ΔCq method normalized to the endogenous control, with ΔCt=Cttarget-Ctreference (17,18).
ELISA
Stored serum obtained from each categorical subject was thawed and assayed for PGLYRP1 by using a commercial ELISA kit (cat. no. SED937Hu; USCN Life Science Inc., Wuhan, China) (19).
Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and routine blood measurement
The concentrations of serum CRP and RF were determined by nephelometry methods, according to the manufacturer's protocol (IMMUNE800; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA). ACPA of immunoglobulin G in serum was measured using a commercial ELISA kit (cat. no. EC180701; Shanghai Kexin Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). ESR and routine bloods were determined erythrocyte sediment rate analyzer and hematology analyzer according to the manufacturer's protocols.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis and graphical presentation were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and SPSS software version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess whether the data were normally distributed. In addition, a Student's t-test was used where the normality test passed; otherwise, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the data. Likewise, the Pearson method or the nonparametric Spearman method was used for correlation analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic value of PGLYRP-1 in the serum of RA patients compared with the HCs. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Expression of Pglyrp1 is upregulated in PBMCs from patients with RA
The expression of Pglyrp1 in PBMCs from 44 patients with RA and 51 HCs was first analyzed using RT-qPCR. As presented in Fig. 1, compared with the HCs, the expression level of Pglyrp1 in patients with RA was significantly upregulated (P=0.0063).
Expression of PGLYRP-1 is increased in the serum from RA
To determine the expression of the Pglyrp1 gene encoding the PGLYRP-1 protein in serum from RA, additional serum samples of RA patients (n=40) and HC (n=40) were obtained and ELISAs were performed. As illustrated in Fig. 2, a significant increase in the serum levels of PGLYRP-1 in the RA group was demonstrated compared with the HC group (P<0.0001).
Potential diagnostic values of PGLYRP-1 in the serum in RA
Next, analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential diagnostic value of PGLYRP-1 in serum. As presented in Fig. 3, the PGLYRP-1 level in the serum from patients with RA was significantly correlated with RF (r=0.50, P=0.0011) and ACPA (r=0.45, P=0.0039), which are antibody hallmarks of RA and may reflect the severity of the disease (20,21). However, the PGLYRP-1 level in the serum from patients with RA was not correlated with ESR, CRP or DAS28 (data not shown).
It was hypothesized that the PGLYRP-1 level in the serum may be used as a biomarker of RA. Therefore, a ROC curve was constructed. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was up to 0.832 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.745–0.919; P<0.0001; Fig. 4] calculated using 0.7306 as the cutoff point. The sensitivity and specificity were 85.0 and 65.0%, respectively.
PGLYRP-1 level in the serum in patients with RA and SLE
The level of PGLYRP-1 was significantly increased in patients with RA compared with patients with SLE (P<0.0001; Fig. 5A). Subsequently, a risk score based on PGLYRP-1 in serum was further assessed in RA patients and all controls (HC + SLE). The AUC for the risk score was 0.780 (95% CI, 0.719–0.880; P<0.0001; Fig. 5B). The sensitivity and specificity were 85.0 and 64.2%, respectively. The risk score also significantly differentiated the patients with RA from disease controls (SLE) and the AUC was 0.768 (95% CI: 0.665–0.871; P<0.0001; Fig. 5C). The sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 and 61.0%, respectively.
Due to the difference in the ages of high incidence between RA and SLE (the incidence of RA is high in people of 50–60 years, and the incidence of SLE is high in women of childbearing age), patients with RA and SLE were not age-matched in the present study. No correlation between PGLYRP-1 serum levels and age or sex was observed in SLE, RA and HC (Fig. 6).
Discussion
The Pglyrp1 gene encodes an innate immunity protein (PGLYRP-1) that directly breaks down the structure of microbial cell wall peptidoglycan and serves an important role in antibacterial defenses, and several inflammatory diseases (22). To the best of our knowledge, only one study has demonstrated that SNPs of Pglyrp1 are associated with RA (12), which suggested that the Pglyrp1 gene was correlated with RA. However, there are no reports regarding the assessment of the Pglyrp1/PGLYRP-1 levels in the peripheral blood from patients with RA, to the best of our knowledge. The present study is among the first studies to report the level of Pglyrp1 in PBMCs, in which the level of PGLYRP-1 in the serum was increased in patients with RA. These results indicated that Pglyrp1/PGLYRP-1 may be associated with the pathogenesis of RA.
RA is a chronic, debilitating systemic autoimmune disease with unclear etiology. In 2010, the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis, ACPA, RF, CRP and ESR were adopted to diagnose RA (23). However, all of these biomarkers suffer from a weak correlation with the disease severity of RA. Novel biomarkers with a satisfactory correlation with the disease activity of RA are required for the evaluation of the curative effect of treatment or disease development (5). The present study revealed that the level of PGLYRP-1 was increased and the regression model from PGLYRP-1 demonstrated that the AUC was high. Furthermore, the risk score based on PGLYRP-1 indicated that it may significantly discriminate patients with RA from those with SLE. The results supported the level of PGLYRP-1 in the serum being used as a candidate biomarker of RA.
It is well-known that RA is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by increased auto-antibodies, including RF and ACPA (24). Additionally, the RF/ACPA titer is frequently positively correlated with disease activity and the severity of joint destruction (25). In the present study, the serum levels of RF and ACPA were first determined and analyzed due to their association with the level of PGLYRP-1 in the serum. The obtained data demonstrated that the level of PGLYRP-1 was positively correlated with RF and ACPA in the serum of patients with RA and suggested that the level of PGLYRP-1 in the serum may be associated with the autoimmune responses of RA and disease activity.
However, there are a number of limitations to the present study. The first one is the relatively small sample size of patients with novel-onset RA, which results in some uncertainty as to whether the use of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs affect the expression of PGLYRP-1 in the serum. The second issue is the relatively small sample size of patients with RA, and the present study is limited as only patients from one hospital were included, which may restrict the representativeness of the results. Third, due to the lack of data on RF and ACPA in HC, the values of PGLYRP-1 in serum plus RF/ACPA in RA diagnosis were not evaluated. Fourth, the roles of PGLYRP-1 in RA pathogenesis in this study were not investigated. However, the increased expression of PGLYRP-1 and its correlation with RF and ACPA suggest that PGLYRP-1 may serve specific roles in the pathogenesis of RA, which will be investigated in the authors' future study.
In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the level of PGLYRP-1 in serum was demonstrated for the first time to be upregulated in RA patients. The results of the present study established an association between the level of PGLYRP-1 in the serum and RA disease activity. Serum PGLYRP-1 is a promising diagnostic biomarker for RA.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the advice received from Dr Rui Wu [affiliated to the Department of Rheumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University].
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81360459), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 20151BAB215031 and 20171BAB205113), the Science and Technology Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Jiangxi Province of China (grant no. 20165094) and the Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists of Jiangxi Province of China (grant no. 20171BCB23087).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
QL, XL, ZH and JL conceived and designed the experiments. QL, XL, LZ, FY, ZD, CQ, RS, JX and YG performed the experiments. QL, XL, ZH and JL analyzed the data. QL, XL, ZH and JL wrote the manuscript. FY, ZD, CQ, RS, JX and YG contributed reagents, materials and analytical tools. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (approval no. 019) and was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. All participants signed informed consent forms.
Patient consent for publication
All participants signed informed consent forms.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Schett G and Gravallese E: Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: Mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 8:656–664. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Crotti TN, Dharmapatni AA, Alias E, Zannettino AC, Smith MD and Haynes DR: The immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM)-related factors are increased in synovial tissue and vasculature of rheumatoid arthritic joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 14:R2452012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wong JB, Ramey DR and Singh G: Long-term morbidity, mortality, and economics of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 44:2746–2749. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lajas C, Abasolo L, Bellajdel B, Hernández-García C, Carmona L, Vargas E, Lázaro P and Jover JA: Costs and predictors of costs in rheumatoid arthritis: A prevalence-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 49:64–70. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ouyang Q, Wu J, Jiang Z, Zhao J, Wang R, Lou A, Zhu D, Shi GP and Yang M: Microarray expression profile of circular RNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Cell Physiol Biochem. 42:651–659. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guan R and Mariuzza RA: Peptidoglycan recognition proteins of the innate immune system. Trends Microbiol. 15:127–134. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Royet J and Dziarski R: Peptidoglycan recognition proteins: Pleiotropic sensors and effectors of antimicrobial defences. Nat Rev Microbiol. 5:264–277. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dziarski R and Gupta D: Review: Mammalian peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs) in innate immunity. Innate Immun. 16:168–174. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Luo Q, Zeng L, Mei H, Huang Z, Luo X, Ye J, Li X, Guo Y and Li J: PD-L1-expressing neutrophils as a novel indicator to assess disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 10:7716–7724. 2017. | |
Villanueva-Romero R, Gutiérrez-Cañas I, Carrión M, Pérez-García S, Seoane IV, Martínez C, Gomariz RP and Juarranz Y: The anti-inflammatory mediator, vasoactive intestinal peptide, modulates the differentiation and function of th subsets in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol Res. 2018:60437102018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Calabresi E, Petrelli F, Bonifacio AF, Puxeddu I and Alunno A: One year in review 2018: Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 36:175–184. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fodil M, Teixeira VH, Chaudru V, Hilliquin P, Bombardieri S, Balsa A, Westhovens R, Barrera P, Alves H, Migliorin P, et al: Relationship between SNPs and expression level for candidate genes in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 44:2–7. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS, et al: The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 31:315–324. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Shan Y, Jiang Z, Feng J, Li C, Ma L and Jiang Y: High frequencies of activated B cells and T follicular helper cells are correlated with disease activity in patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 174:212–220. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Prevoo ML, van't Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB and van Riel PL: Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 38:44–48. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hochberg MC: Updating the American College of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 40:17251997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Luo Q, Zhang L, Li X, Fu B, Deng Z, Qing C, Su R, Xu J, Guo Y, Huang Z and Li J: Identification of circular RNAs hsa_circ_0044235 in peripheral blood as novel biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 194:118–124. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang F, Wu L, Qian J, Qu B, Xia S, La T, Wu Y, Ma J, Zeng J, Guo Q, et al: Identification of the long noncoding RNA NEAT1 as a novel inflammatory regulator acting through MAPK pathway in human lupus. J Autoimmun. 75:96–104. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park HJ, Noh JH, Eun JW, Koh YS, Seo SM, Park WS, Lee JY, Chang K, Seung KB, Kim PJ and Nam SW: Assessment and diagnostic relevance of novel serum biomarkers for early decision of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Oncotarget. 6:12970–12983. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Alemao E, Guo Z, Frits ML, Iannaccone CK, Shadick NA and Weinblatt ME: Association of anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies, erosions, and rheumatoid factor with disease activity and work productivity: A patient registry study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 47:630–638. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haschka J, Englbrecht M, Hueber AJ, Manger B, Kleyer A, Reiser M, Finzel S, Tony HP, Kleinert S, Feuchtenberger M, et al: Relapse rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in stable remission tapering or stopping anti-rheumatic therapy: Interim results from the prospective randomized controlled RETRO study. Ann Rheum Dis. 75:45–51. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tydell CC, Yuan J, Tran P and Selsted ME: Bovine peptidoglycan recognition protein-S: antimicrobial activity, localization, secretion, and binding properties. J Immunol. 176:1154–1162. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kedar MP, Acharya RV and Prakashini K: Performance of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria for classification of rheumatoid arthritis in an Indian population: An observational study in a single centre. Indian J Med Res. 144:288–292. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Falkenburg WJJ, Kempers AC, Dekkers G, Ooijevaar-de Heer P, Bentlage AEH, Vidarsson G, van Schaardenburg D, Toes REM, Scherer HU and Rispens T: Rheumatoid factors do not preferentially bind to ACPA-IgG or IgG with altered galactosylation. Rheumatology (Oxford). 56:2025–2030. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schett G: The role of ACPAs in at-risk individuals: Early targeting of the bone and joints. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 31:53–58. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |