miR‑576‑3p overexpression enhances cisplatin sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells by dysregulating PD‑L1 and cyclin D1

  • Authors:
    • Ying Zuo
    • Wei Zheng
    • Qing Tang
    • Jing Liu
    • Shanshan Wang
    • Chunxia Xin
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 23, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11719
  • Article Number: 81
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Cisplatin (DDP) resistance is a major obstacle in the chemotherapeutic efficacy of ovarian cancer. The present study aimed to explore the role of miR‑576‑3p in DDP sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells. Ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 and A2780 and DDP‑resistant ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP were used in the present study. In vitro studies demonstrated that microRNA (miR)‑576‑3p overexpression increased the DDP sensitivity of DDP‑resistant ovarian cancer cells. A dual‑luciferase assay verified that both programmed death‑ligand 1 (PD‑L1) and cyclin D1 were targets of miR‑276‑3p and were reversely associated with the expression of miR‑576‑3p. Moreover, in vivo studies indicated that tumorigenesis was inhibited by DDP, which was enhanced by further miR‑576‑3p overexpression in tumor tissues. Taken together, the results suggested that miR‑576‑3p overexpression increased DDP chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer cells via decreasing PD‑L1 and cyclin D1, indicating that miR‑576‑3p may serve as a promising therapeutic target for ovarian cancer.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed and most deadly gynecological malignancy worldwide (1). According to 2018 statistics, 225,500 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and 140,200 women died from this disease worldwide (2). Etiological studies reported that childbearing, family history of ovarian cancer, smoking, obesity, and diet may increase the risk of ovarian cancer (3). At present, the conventional treatment of ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery, followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy (4). Cisplatin (DDP) and paclitaxel are the main chemotherapeutic drugs used in ovarian cancer. However, >60% of the patients develop advanced-stage relapse or do not respond to chemotherapy (5,6). Although the majority of patients are initially sensitive to chemotherapy, they often develop resistance after multiple relapses. Due to the lack of effective second-line chemotherapy, the overall survival of patients is short, at only 1 year (7). Therefore, it is crucial to overcome the drug resistance of patients with ovarian cancer to improve their prognosis.

MicroRNAs (miRs/miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression by silencing or degrading their target mRNA molecules, thereby mediating various pathological processes, including tumorigenesis (8). Various miRNAs are dysregulated in several cancers. Among them, miR-576-3p was found to be downregulated in non-melanoma skin cancer (9). In lung adenocarcinoma, miR-576-3p was significantly reduced, and its overexpression reduced the expression of mesenchymal markers, and inhibited the migration and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells (10). miR-576-3p downregulation was also observed in bladder cancer tissues and was found to be correlated with poor clinical outcome (11). These findings indicated the negative regulatory effect of miR-576-3p on cancer development. Moreover, miR-576-3p may also be closely associated with the chemosensitivity of tumors. Studies have found that miR-576-3p was downregulated in DDP-resistant human teratoma cells, as well as Adriamycin-resistant breast cancer tissues and cells (12,13). However, further investigation is required to determine whether miR-576-3p plays an important role in mediating the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to DDP-based chemotherapy.

In present study, TargetScan7.2 (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) predicted that miR-576-3p may target programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cyclin D1. PD-L1 has been demonstrated to be associated with cancer prognosis and is highly expressed in gastric, colon, and lung cancers (1416). PD-1/PD-L1 signal blockade is beneficial for the treatment of cancer, including colon and liver cancer (15,17). Moreover, PD-L1 was found to be upregulated in DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells, and downregulation of PD-L1 increased DDP sensitivity in lung cancer (18,19). Cyclin D1 is a key regulator of the G1/S transition and has been reported to play a key role in tumor cell development and drug resistance (20). Downregulation of cyclin D1 increased DDP chemosensitivity in gastric cancer (21), whereas overexpression of cyclin D1 was revealed to promote tumor cell growth and resistance of pancreatic tumor cell lines to DDP-mediated apoptosis (22). Thus, based on the significant role of PD-L1 and cyclin D1 in cancer development and chemotherapy sensitivity, the present study investigated whether miR-576-3p affects the chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to DDP by regulating PD-L1 and cyclin D1.

Materials and methods

Cell culture, transfection and drug administration

Cell culture, transfection, and treatment of human ovarian cancer cells were performed as described previously (19). Ovarian cancer cells SKOV3 and A2780 were purchased from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd. 293T cells were purchased from Shanghai Zhongqiao Xinzhou Biotechnology Co., Ltd. DDP was purchased from Dalian Meilun Biology Technology Co., Ltd. Cells were maintained in Minimum Essential Medium (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) in a 37°C incubator containing 5% CO2. The transfection of miR-576-3p mimic, negative control (NC) mimic, miR-576-3p inhibitor, and NC inhibitor (100 pmol) into cells (at 90% confluence) was performed using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's instructions. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were used for subsequent experiments. The sequences of the mimics and inhibitors were as follows: miR-576-3p mimic forward, 5′-AAGAUGUGGAAAAAUUGGAAUC-3′ and reverse, 5′-UUCCAAUUUUUCCACAUCUUUU-3′; NC mimic forward, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT−3′; miR-576-3p inhibitor, 5′-GAUUCCAAUUUUUCCACAUCUU-3′; NC inhibitor, 5′-UUGUACUACACAAAAGUACUG−3′. The sequences were purchased from JTS Scientific Biological Technology Co., Ltd.

Construction of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines

DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP were established by culturing SKOV3 and A2780 cells with increasing concentrations of DDP. Briefly, SKOV3 and A2780 cells were resuscitated and cultured in an incubator. At 60% confluence, cells were treated with DDP at concentrations of 1, 2, 4, and 8 µM. Once the cells were incubated for 48 h, the medium was discarded and fresh medium was added. After 12 weeks, stable DDP-resistant SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP cells were successfully established and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Cytotoxicity assay

Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a cell count of 5×103 per well. At 24 h after transfection, medium (200 µl) containing different concentrations of DPP (5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 µM) was added to each well (23,24). After the cells were incubated for 48 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 MTT mixture (0.5 mg/ml) was added into each well, and cells were then incubated at 37°C for 5 h. Subsequently, DMSO solution (150 µl) was added to dissolve the purple formazan. After 10 min of incubation in the dark, the optical density value of cells at a wavelength of 570 nm was measured and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was calculated.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis

Total RNA was extracted from tissues or cells using a total RNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA concentration in each sample was detected by ultraviolet spectrophotometry (NanoDrop 2000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). cDNA was reverse-transcribed from RNA using RNase inhibitor (BioTeke Corporation) and Super M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (BioTeke Corporation). The following temperature protocol was used for reverse transcription for miR-576-3p: 37°C for 30 min, 42°C for 30 min and 70°C for 10 min. The following temperature protocol was used for reverse transcription for cyclin D1 and PD-L1: 25°C for 10 min, 42°C for 50 min and 80°C for 10 min. Subsequently, RT-qPCR analysis was performed with primers, SYBR-Green (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and 2X Power Taq PCR Master Mix (BioTeke Corporation) to detect miR-576-3p expression level. The following thermocycling conditions were used for qPCR for miR-576-3p: 94°C for 4 min, 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 20 sec and 72°C for 15 sec. The following thermocycling conditions were used for qPCR for cyclin D1 and PD-L1: 94°C for 5 min, 40 cycles of 94°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 25 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. The primers used for qPCR were as follows: miR-576-3p forward, 5′-AAGATGTGGAAAAATTGGAATC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTC-3′; 5S rRNA forward, 5′-GATCTCGGAAGCTAAGCAGG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTAT-3′; cyclin D1 forward, 5′-GCGAGGAACAGAAGTGCG−3′ and reverse, 5′-TGGAGTTGTCGGTGTAGATGC−3′; PD-L1 forward, 5′-AACTACCTCTGGCACATC−3′ and reverse, 5′-ATCCATCATTCTCCCTTT-3′; β-actin forward, 5′-GGCACCCAGCACAATGAA−3′ and reverse, 5′-TAGAAGCATTTGCGGTGG-3′. The primers were purchased from GenScript. The expression of miR-576-3p, and cyclin D1 and PD-L1 was calculated and normalized to 5S rRNA and β-actin, respectively. Gene expression was quantified using the 2−∆∆Cq method (25).

Western blot analysis

Total protein was extracted from tissues or cells using IP cell lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride protease inhibitor (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Protein concentration was quantified using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Proteins (20 µl/lane) from each sample were separated via SDS-PAGE (8 and 13% separation gel for different sized proteins) and then transferred to a PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore). After blocking in 5% skimmed milk powder for 1 h at room temperature the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit/mouse secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature (1:5,000; cat. nos. A0208 and A0216; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The primary antibodies used were as follows: PD-L1 (1:1,000; cat. no. DF6526; Affinity Biosciences), cyclin D1 (1:1,000; cat. no. AF0931; Affinity Biosciences), efflux pump multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1; 1:1,000; cat. no. AF5185; Affinity Biosciences), pro/cleaved caspase-3 (1:1,000; cat. no. DF6879; Affinity Biosciences), pro/cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP; 1:1,000; cat. no. #9532; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), and β-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Finally, the membranes were visualized with ECL luminescent reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and the optical density values of the target bands were analyzed using Gel-Pro-Analyzer software (version 4; Media Cybernetics, Inc.). β-actin served as an internal control.

Cell cycle assay

Cells were incubated in 6-well plates at a density of 2×105 cells/well. After transfection with miR-576-3p mimic or NC mimic, cells were treated with DDP at 50% of the IC50 dose at 37°C for 24 h. The treated cells were harvested and fixed in 70% ethanol at 4°C for 2 h, followed by incubation with propidium iodide (PI; 25 µl) and RNase A (10 µl) at 37°C for 30 min in the dark. Finally, the cell cycle distribution was detected by flow cytometry using a NovoCyte flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, Inc.) and analyzed using NovoExpress software (version 1.2.5; ACEA Biosciences, Inc.).

Cell apoptosis assay

Both early and late apoptotic cells were assessed. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 2×105 cells/well. After transfection, cells were treated with DDP at 50% of the IC50 dose at 37°C for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were treated with 5 µl Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and 10 µl PI for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. Finally, cells stained with V-FITC and PI were detected by flow cytometry using a NovoCyte flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, Inc.) and analyzed using NovoExpress (version 1.2.5; ACEA Biosciences, Inc.).

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

The binding sites between miR-576-3p and PD-L1 and cyclin D1 were determined using TargetScan (version 7.2; http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/). PD-L1 and cyclin D1 fragments containing the target sequence of miR-576-3p were inserted into pmirGLO vectors (GenScript) to construct wild-type (wt) and mutant (mut) plasmids. Subsequently, the plasmids were co-transfected with miR-576-3p mimic, NC mimic, miR-576-3p inhibitor or NC inhibitor into 293T cells (at 90% confluence) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After 48 h, luciferase activity was detected using a Dual-Luciferase Detection kit (Promega Corporation). Firefly luciferase activities were normalized to Renilla luciferase activities.

Animal experiments

The present study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital (approval no. 2018137; Shandong, China) and performed according to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (26). The feeding and treatment of mice were performed as described in our previous study (19). Briefly, 12 healthy female BALB/c nude mice (weight, ~20 g) aged 5–6 weeks were given free access to food and water and fed adaptively for 1 week. Mice were randomly divided into two groups: SKOV3/DDP + LV-NC + DDP group and SKOV3/DDP + LV-miR-576-3p + DDP group (n=6/group). The construction of SKOV3/DDP cells was performed as aforementioned. The nude mice were subcutaneously injected (the right side of the back of the neck) with lentivirus (LV) miR-576-3p infected SKOV3/DDP cells (2×106 in PBS) or LV control-infected SKOV3/DDP cells (2×106 in PBS). The tumor was confirmed by a pathologist. When the tumor volume reached 100 mm3, all nude mice were intraperitoneally injected with DDP (10 mg/kg) twice a week for 3 weeks. Tumor size was monitored every 2 days. After 19 days, nude mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Death verification was confirmed by cessation of heartbeat and respiration, and absence of reflexes and metabolism. After the mice stopped breathing, the tumors were resected.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± SD of three repeats, except for animal experiments (n=6). GraphPad 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) was used to perform statistical analysis. An unpaired t-test, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test or two-way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons test were used to evaluate statistical significance. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-576-3p is downregulated whereas PD-L1 and cyclin D1 are upregulated in DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells

To investigate whether miR-576-3p, PD-L1 and cyclin D1 are involved in DDP resistance of ovarian cancer cells, DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP were used. The results demonstrated that, as the concentration of DDP increased, the viability of ovarian cancer cells SKOV3 and A2780 and DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP significantly decreased. Furthermore, the cell viability of ovarian cancer cells was more affected by DDP compared with that of DDP-resistant cells (Fig. 1A). In addition, the tolerance of SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP cells to DDP was significantly higher compared with that of SKOV3 and A2780 cells (Fig. 1B). RT-qPCR analysis was used to detect the mRNA expression of miR-576-3p in DDP-resistant cells, and the results revealed that the mRNA levels of miR-576-3p in SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP cells were downregulated compared with those in SKOV3 and A2780 cells (Fig. 1C). Western blotting demonstrated that the protein expression levels of PD-L1 and cyclin D1 in DDP-resistant cells were significantly higher compared with those in non-resistant cells (Fig. 1D and E). These data indicated that miR-576-3p, PD-L1 and cyclin D1 may be involved in DDP resistance of ovarian cancer cells.

miR-576-3p overexpression increases DDP sensitivity of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells in vitro

The role of miR-576-3p in ovarian cancer cells was investigated via transfection of miR-576-3p mimic, which significantly increased the expression of miR-576-3p in ovarian cancer cells (Fig. S1A). Furthermore, miR-576-3p overexpression decreased ovarian cancer cell viability, and promoted apoptosis and the accumulation of ovarian cancer cells in the G1 phase (Fig. S2). To study the effects of miR-576-3p on DDP sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells, DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells were transfected with miR-576-3p mimic or NC mimic. The results demonstrated that miR-576-3p overexpression significantly increased miR-576-3p mRNA expression in DDP-resistant cells (Fig. 2A). miR-576-3p upregulation reduced DDP tolerance in DDP-resistant cells (Fig. 2B). Moreover, the viability of DDP-resistant cells decreased with the increase in DDP concentration, and miR-576-3p overexpression increased the DDP sensitivity of SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP cells (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, DDP treatment had no significant effect on DDP-resistant cell cycle progression and apoptosis compared with the control group (Fig. 2D and E). However, overexpression of miR-576-3p resulted in the accumulation of DDP-resistant cells in the G1 phase and promotion of cell apoptosis (Fig. 2D and E). Additionally, DDP treatment reduced the protein levels of PD-L1, cyclin D1 and MDR1, but increased the cleaved/pro caspase-3 ratio and cleaved/pro PARP ratio in DDP-treated DDP-resistant cells compared with the control group (Fig. 3). Moreover, miR-576-3p overexpression further enhanced the effects of DDP on PD-L1, cyclin D1, MDR1, cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP protein levels (Fig. 3). Therefore, miR-576-3p overexpression increased DDP sensitivity of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells via regulating cell viability and apoptosis.

miR-576-3p directly targets PD-L1 and cyclin D1

A dual-luciferase assay was performed to detect the targeting relationship between miR-576-3p and PD-L1 and cyclin D1. The binding sites between miR-576-3p and PD-L1 and cyclin D1 were determined using TargetScan (version 7.2; http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/). As shown in Fig. 4A and B, the luciferase activity in cells transfected with wt-PD-L1 and wt-cyclin D1 plasmids was significantly decreased by miR-576-3p mimic transfection. The luciferase activity in cells transfected with mut-PD-L1 and mut-cyclin D1 plasmids showed no significant change. The results indicated that miR-576-3p can directly target PD-L1 and cyclin D1. Additionally, the mRNA and protein expression levels of PD-L1 and cyclin D1 were significantly reduced in SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP cells following miR-576-3p mimic transfection, but were significantly increased by transfection with a miR-576-3p inhibitor (Figs. 4C-F and S1B). Therefore, miR-576-3p overexpression may regulate cell viability and apoptosis via targeting PD-L1 and cyclin D1.

miR-576-3p overexpression enhances the efficacy of DDP in inhibiting ovarian tumor growth in vivo

The effects of miR-576-3p on DDP resistance in ovarian cancer cells were also investigated using a xenograft tumor model. The results demonstrated that DDP treatment inhibited tumor growth in the nude mice injected with miR-576-3p overexpressing-SKOV3/DDP cells compared with the control group (Fig. 5A and B). The mRNA expression level of miR-576-3p was upregulated in miR-576-3p-overexpressing ovarian tumor tissues (Fig. 5C). Western blotting demonstrated that the protein expression levels of PD-L1, cyclin D1 and MDR1 were downregulated, whereas the cleaved/pro caspase-3 ratio and cleaved/pro PARP ratio were upregulated in miR-576-3p-overexpressing tumor tissues treated with DDP (Fig. 5D). Overall, miR-576-3p overexpression enhanced DDP sensitivity of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells in vivo.

Discussion

Ovarian cancer is one of the most malignant tumors of the female reproductive system. With the widespread application of chemotherapeutic drugs, patients with ovarian cancer may develop drug resistance that adversely affects their prognosis. Hence, it is crucial to identify methods that enhance the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to DPP. Various studies have indicated that miRNAs have a crucial role in cancer progression and chemosensitivity due to their important regulatory functions of targets at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. The findings of the present study suggested that miR-576-3p was downregulated in DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells, and miR-576-3p overexpression may enhance DDP sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells via targeting PD-L1 and cyclin D1.

It was observed that DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP had a higher IC50 value compared with SKOV3 and A2780 cells, indicating that SKOV3 and A2780 cells were more sensitive to DDP compared with SKOV3/DDP and A2780/DDP cells. Furthermore, miR-576-3p overexpression significantly decreased the IC50 value of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells, indicating that miR-576-3p overexpression increased the sensitivity of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells to DDP. It was previously demonstrated that miR-576-3p was downregulated in non-melanoma skin cancer, lung adenocarcinoma and bladder cancer (911). The downregulation of miR-576-3p was found to be associated with the chemosensitivity of human teratoma and breast cancer cells (12,13). The present study demonstrated that miR-576-3p overexpression inhibited viability and promoted apoptosis of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells. A previous study reported that the antitumor effects of DDP on drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells may be enhanced by induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell migration and invasion (27). Therefore, the effects of miR-576-3p overexpression on promoting the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to DDP may be achieved by inhibiting viability and promoting apoptosis in DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells.

In the present study, upregulation of PD-L1, MDR1 and cyclin D1 was observed in DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells, whereas miR-576-3p overexpression reduced the expression levels of PD-L1, MDR1 and cyclin D1. MDR1 is an ATP-binding cassette transporter that acts as an energy-dependent efflux pump for multiple drugs and is responsible for reducing drug accumulation in cells, ultimately causing drug resistance (28). MDR1 efflux is considered to be the primary mechanism of ovarian cancer resistance to taxanes (29). MDR1 overexpression reduced the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin and paclitaxel, whereas MDR1 knockdown increased chemosensitivity to vincristine, paclitaxel and docetaxel (30,31). PD-L1 is an antitumor immune negative regulator. During cancer development, the increased binding of PD-L1 to the receptor PD-1 on T cells causes T-cell dysfunction, thereby preventing cytotoxic T cells from effectively targeting tumor cells, leading to tumor cell survival (32). Our previous research found that PD-L1 was highly expressed in DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells, and PD-L1 silencing decreased this DDP resistance (19). Clinical studies have demonstrated that PD-L1 may be a potential mechanism used by cancer cells to evade immune defense, and inhibiting the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 may enhance the T cell response and mediate antitumor activity (33). Currently, PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-PD-L1 antibodies developed for PD-L1 have been successful in clinical trials of cancer therapy (34). It was reported that the combined administration of anti-PD-L1 antibodies and DDP significantly reduced tumor growth compared with single-agent treatments and controls (35). These findings indicated a key role of PD-L1 in regulating DDP resistance of cancer cells. The survival and proliferation of cancer cells require the expression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 acts as an allosteric modulator of cellular cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 to regulate the transition of the cell cycle from the G1 to the S phase (36). Cyclin D1 overexpression was found to be associated with a high risk of recurrence of invasive serous ovarian cancer and poor response to first-line chemotherapy (37). Consistent with these previous findings, the results of the present study suggested that miR-576-3p overexpression increased the chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to DDP via regulating PD-L1, MDR1 and cyclin D1 levels. Furthermore, in vivo studies suggested that miR-576-3p overexpression inhibited tumorigenesis and downregulated the expression of PD-L1, MDR1 and cyclin D1 in tumor tissues, which was consistent with the in vitro findings.

In bladder cancer, a targeting relationship between miR-576-3p and cyclin D1 has already been identified (38), and the present study also further confirmed this targeting relationship. Additionally, it was demonstrated that PD-L1 is one of the targets of miR-576-3p. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence of miR-576-3p targeting and regulating the expression of MDR1. The present study demonstrated that miR-576-3p may indirectly regulate the expression of MDR1 via PD-L1 and cyclin D1. A previous study demonstrated that the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction may upregulate the expression of MDR1 in breast cancer cells (39). In addition, knockdown of cyclin D1 significantly reduced the expression of MDR1 in human glioblastoma (40). Therefore, the effect of miR-576-3p overexpression on the chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer cells may be achieved by targeting PD-L1 and cyclin D1. Furthermore, it was previously reported that PD-L1 silencing promoted apoptosis of DDP-resistant ovarian cancer cells and inhibited cell proliferation, whereas PD-L1 overexpression inhibited apoptosis and promoted cell proliferation (19). DDP inhibited the proliferation of human epithelial ovarian cancer cells and promoted apoptosis via the inhibition of cyclin D1, and the overexpression of cyclin D1 increased the proliferative ability of epithelial ovarian cancer cells (41,42). Collectively, these findings demonstrated that miR-576-3p overexpression may promote apoptosis and inhibit the viability of ovarian cancer cells via decreasing PD-L1 and cyclin D1 expression.

However, a limitation of the present study is that there were only six mice in each group for the animal experiments. Moreover, further studies are needed to explore whether miR-576-3p can regulate cisplatin sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells by directly regulating PD-L1 and cyclin D1 in vivo.

In conclusion, previous findings have indicated that both PD-L1 and cyclin D1 are important in the modulation of ovarian tumor progression. Combined with the findings of the present study, it was shown that that miR-576-3p played a key role in ovarian cancer development and DDP resistance via negatively regulating PD-L1 and cyclin D1 expression.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Data

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

YZ and WZ performed the experiments, contributed to data analysis and made substantial contributions to the conception and design. QT, JL and SW contributed to data analysis and the experimental materials. CX made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, gave final approval of the version to be published, agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved, drafted the manuscript and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital (approval no. 2018137; Shandong, China) and performed according to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Salehi F, Dunfield L, Phillips KP, Krewski D and Vanderhyden BC: Risk factors for ovarian cancer: An overview with emphasis on hormonal factors. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 11:301–321. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Bristow RE and Chi DS: Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 103:1070–1076. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Pignata S, C Cecere S, Du Bois A, Harter P and Heitz F: Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 28 (Suppl 8):viii51–viii6. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Bookman MA: Optimal primary therapy of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 27 (Suppl 1):i58–i62. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Jayson GC, Kohn EC, Kitchener HC and Ledermann JA: Ovarian cancer. Lancet. 384:1376–1388. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hayes J, Peruzzi PP and Lawler S: MicroRNAs in cancer: Biomarkers, functions and therapy. Trends Mol Med. 20:460–469. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Balci S, Ayaz L, Gorur A, Yildirim Yaroglu H, Akbayir S, Dogruer Unal N, Bulut B, Tursen U and Tamer L: microRNA profiling for early detection of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Clin Exp Dermatol. 41:346–351. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Greenawalt EJ, Edmonds MD, Jain N, Adams CM, Mitra R and Eischen CM: Targeting of SGK1 by miR-576-3p Inhibits Lung Adenocarcinoma Migration and Invasion. Mol Cancer Res. 17:289–298. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Meng FM, Meng FM and Song XL: MiR-576-3p is a novel marker correlated with poor clinical outcome in bladder cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 21:973–977. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Port M, Glaesener S, Ruf C, Riecke A, Bokemeyer C, Meineke V, Honecker F and Abend M: Micro-RNA expression in cisplatin resistant germ cell tumor cell lines. Mol Cancer. 10:522011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lv J, Xia K, Xu P, Sun E, Ma J, Gao S, Zhou Q, Zhang M, Wang F, Chen F, et al: miRNA expression patterns in chemoresistant breast cancer tissues. Biomed Pharmacother. 68:935–942. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Wang X, Wu WKK, Gao J, Li Z, Dong B, Lin X, Li Y, Li Y, Gong J, Qi C, et al: Autophagy inhibition enhances PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 38:1402019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Wyss J, Dislich B, Koelzer VH, Galván JA, Dawson H, Hädrich M, Inderbitzin D, Lugli A, Zlobec I and Berger MD: Stromal PD-1/PD-L1 expression predicts outcome in colon cancer patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 18:e20–e38. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Rojkó L, Reiniger L, Téglási V, Fábián K, Pipek O, Vágvölgyi A, Agócs L, Fillinger J, Kajdácsi Z, Tímár J, et al: Chemotherapy treatment is associated with altered PD-L1 expression in lung cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 144:1219–1226. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Cai J, Qi Q, Qian X, Han J, Zhu X, Zhang Q and Xia R: The role of PD-1/PD-L1 axis and macrophage in the progression and treatment of cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 145:1377–1385. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Jiang Z, Yang Y, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Yue Z, Pan Z and Ren X: Ginsenoside Rg3 attenuates cisplatin resistance in lung cancer by downregulating PD-L1 and resuming immune. Biomed Pharmacother. 96:378–383. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zuo Y, Zheng W, Liu J, Tang Q, Wang SS and Yang XS: MiR-34a-5p/PD-L1 axis regulates cisplatin chemoresistance of ovarian cancer cells. Neoplasma. 67:93–101. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Sherr CJ: G1 phase progression: Cycling on cue. Cell. 79:551–555. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Hu J, Fang Y, Cao Y, Qin R and Chen Q: miR-449a Regulates proliferation and chemosensitivity to cisplatin by targeting cyclin D1 and BCL2 in SGC7901 cells. Dig Dis Sci. 59:336–345. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Biliran H Jr, Wang Y, Banerjee S, Xu H, Heng H, Thakur A, Bollig A, Sarkar FH and Liao JD: Overexpression of cyclin D1 promotes tumor cell growth and confers resistance to cisplatin-mediated apoptosis in an elastase-myc transgene-expressing pancreatic tumor cell line. Clin Cancer Res. 11:6075–6086. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Liu R, Guo H and Lu S: MiR-335-5p restores cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cells through targeting BCL2L2. Cancer Med. 7:4598–4609. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Zou J, Liu L, Wang Q, Yin F, Yang Z, Zhang W and Li L: Downregulation of miR-429 contributes to the development of drug resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer by targeting ZEB1. Am J Transl Res. 9:1357–1368. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th edition. National Academies Press (US); Washington, DC: 2011, PubMed/NCBI

27 

Wang H, Luo Y, Qiao T, Wu Z and Huang Z: Luteolin sensitizes the antitumor effect of cisplatin in drug-resistant ovarian cancer via induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell migration and invasion. J Ovarian Res. 11:932018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Joncourt F, Buser K, Altermatt H, Bacchi M, Oberli A and Cerny T: Multiple drug resistance parameter expression in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 70:176–182. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kavallaris M, Kuo DY, Burkhart CA, Regl DL, Norris MD, Haber M and Horwitz SB: Taxol-resistant epithelial ovarian tumors are associated with altered expression of specific beta-tubulin isotypes. J Clin Invest. 100:1282–1293. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Wu DD, Li XS, Meng XN, Yan J and Zong ZH: MicroRNA-873 mediates multidrug resistance in ovarian cancer cells by targeting ABCB1. Tumour Biol. 37:10499–10506. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zhang H, Wang J, Cai K, Jiang L, Zhou D, Yang C, Chen J, Chen D and Dou J: Downregulation of gene MDR1 by shRNA to reverse multidrug-resistance of ovarian cancer A2780 cells. J Cancer Res Ther. 8:226–231. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Zhang J, Dang F, Ren J and Wei W: Biochemical aspects of PD-L1 regulation in cancer immunotherapy. Trends Biochem Sci. 43:1014–1032. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Iwai Y, Ishida M, Tanaka Y, Okazaki T, Honjo T and Minato N: Involvement of PD-L1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L1 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:12293–12297. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Matsumura N, Abiko K, Baba T and Konishi I: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in cancer treatment: Perspectives and issues. Int J Clin Oncol. 21:462–473. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Fournel L, Wu Z, Stadler N, Damotte D, Lococo F, Boulle G, Ségal-Bendirdjian E, Bobbio A, Icard P, Trédaniel J, et al: Cisplatin increases PD-L1 expression and optimizes immune check-point blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 464:5–14. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Qie S and Diehl JA: Cyclin D1, cancer progression, and opportunities in cancer treatment. J Mol Med (Berl). 94:1313–1326. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Abdelrahman AE, Fathy A, Elsebai EA, Nawar N and Etman WM: Prognostic impact of Apaf-1, Cyclin D1, and AQP-5 in serous ovarian carcinoma treated with the first-line chemotherapy. Ann Diagn Pathol. 35:27–37. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Liang Z, Li S, Xu X, Xu X, Wang X, Wu J, Zhu Y, Hu Z, Lin Y, Mao Y, et al: MicroRNA-576-3p inhibits proliferation in bladder cancer cells by targeting cyclin D1. Mol Cells. 38:130–137. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Liu S, Chen S, Yuan W, Wang H, Chen K and Li D and Li D: PD-1/PD-L1 interaction up-regulates MDR1/P-gp expression in breast cancer cells via PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways. Oncotarget. 8:99901–99912. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Wang J, Wang Q, Cui Y, Liu ZY, Zhao W, Wang CL, Dong Y, Hou L, Hu G, Luo C, et al: Knockdown of cyclin D1 inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis, and attenuates the invasive capacity of human glioblastoma cells. J Neurooncol. 106:473–484. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Dai J, Wei RJ, Li R, Feng JB, Yu YL and Liu PS: A study of CCND1 with epithelial ovarian cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 20:4230–4235. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

42 

Xia B, Yang S, Liu T and Lou G: miR-211 suppresses epithelial ovarian cancer proliferation and cell-cycle progression by targeting Cyclin D1 and CDK6. Mol Cancer. 14:572015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2021
Volume 23 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zuo Y, Zheng W, Tang Q, Liu J, Wang S and Xin C: miR‑576‑3p overexpression enhances cisplatin sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells by dysregulating PD‑L1 and cyclin D1. Mol Med Rep 23: 81, 2021.
APA
Zuo, Y., Zheng, W., Tang, Q., Liu, J., Wang, S., & Xin, C. (2021). miR‑576‑3p overexpression enhances cisplatin sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells by dysregulating PD‑L1 and cyclin D1. Molecular Medicine Reports, 23, 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11719
MLA
Zuo, Y., Zheng, W., Tang, Q., Liu, J., Wang, S., Xin, C."miR‑576‑3p overexpression enhances cisplatin sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells by dysregulating PD‑L1 and cyclin D1". Molecular Medicine Reports 23.1 (2021): 81.
Chicago
Zuo, Y., Zheng, W., Tang, Q., Liu, J., Wang, S., Xin, C."miR‑576‑3p overexpression enhances cisplatin sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells by dysregulating PD‑L1 and cyclin D1". Molecular Medicine Reports 23, no. 1 (2021): 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11719