A microRNA expression signature characterizing the properties of tumor-initiating cells for breast cancer

  • Authors:
    • Lixin Wang
    • Daoqiang Zhang
    • Changwen Zhang
    • Shuping Zhang
    • Zhe Wang
    • Chen Qu
    • Sijin Liu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 28, 2011     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.431
  • Pages: 119-124
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

microRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in controlling tumor behaviors either as oncogenes or tumor suppressors. To elucidate the role of miRNAs in the regulation of tumor initiation, we delineated the microRNA expression signature characterizing the properties of tumor-initiating cells for breast cancer. A group of miRNAs were differentially expressed in MDA-MB‑231 and SUM1315 cells (with a high proportion of breast cancer tumor‑initiating cells, CD44+CD24-/low subpopulation) compared to MCF-7 cells (only a small proportion of CD44+CD24-/low cells). Among the differentially expressed miRNAs common to MDA-MB‑231 and SUM1315, approximately 46% of them are suggested to regulate the 'stemness' of stem cells or progenitor cells. Taken together, these findings suggested that miRNAs contribute to the maintenance of tumor‑initiating properties and indicate the potential value of the miRNA expression signature in characterizing or predicting the features (including metastasis) of breast cancer.

Introduction

The leading cause of death in breast cancer (BrCa) patients is not the primary tumor in the breast per se, but metastasis to distant organs. Metastasis accounts for over 90% of deaths in BrCa patients. Millions of cells are released from the primary tumor into the blood circulation daily, but only a small minority of these cells survive and colonize on distant organs. The aim of the present study was to establish the identity of these cells. According to the current cancer stem cell hypothesis, tumors are organized in cell hierarchies composed of tumor-initiating cells (T-ICs), cancer cells and differentiated cells (1). T-ICs with stem cell-like properties, so-called cancer stem cells, are not only the source of the primary tumor; but are also responsible for tumor growth, metastasis and possible recurrence. The CD44+CD24−/low subpopulation in BrCa cells was reported to be enriched in BrCa T-ICs (2). This subpopulation of cells is capable of generating other cellular phenotypes observed in the original tumor and initiating metastases at distant sites from low numbers of cells (2). However, data on the characteristics of BrCa T-ICs and their molecular regulation is currently limited.

microRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression by binding to their target miRNAs. miRNAs regulate tumor development, prognosis and metastasis either as oncogenes or tumor suppressors (3,4). A burgeoning body of evidence showed that miRNAs modulate the properties of embryonic stem (ES) and tissue stem cells in a variety of eukaryotic organisms (5,6). A group of miRNAs may play specialized roles in stem cell regulation, as the Dicer (the enzyme that processes the pre-miRNAs into mature miRNAs) knockout in mice is embryonically lethal (7), and Dicer conditional knockout mouse ES cells grow more slowly than controls and fail to differentiate (8).

In the present study, we investigated the differences in miRNA expression profiling among BrCa cell lines with various proportions of T-ICs and the potential contribution of miRNAs to maintaining the 'stemness' of BrCa T-ICs. The results indicate that a miRNA expression signature may help identify the stemness of T-ICs, and that certain miRNAs may help predict clinical features, such as metastasis, for BrCa.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and cell culture

Human BrCa cell lines MCF-7, SUM149, SUM1315 and MDA-MB-231 were stored in the laboratory. The culture conditions for each cell line were identical to those used in our previous study (9).

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis

CD24 and CD44 expression of BrCa cells was examined by FACS analysis using anti-CD44 (FITC-conjugated) and anti-CD24 (PE-conjugated) antibodies as previously described (10). The two antibodies were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA).

miRNA microarray analysis

A MiRVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was used to isolate total RNA with enriched miRNAs from cells according to the manufacturer's instructions. miRNA microarray was performed by LC Sciences (Houston, TX, USA; http://www.lcsciences.com) as previously described (9). The differentially expressed miRNAs in SUM1315 and MDA-MB-231 cells were those with a fold-change of >2 or <−2 and P-values of the t-test <0.05 compared to MCF-7 cells.

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses

Total RNA with enriched miRNAs in BrCa cells was isolated as described above. Reverse transcription (RT) was performed using the RT primers for each individual miRNA from Ambion according to the manufacturer's instructions. Real-time PCR was performed using a miRVana qRT-PCR kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions and the protocol used previously (11). PCR primers were purchased from Ambion.

miRNA selection and target gene prediction

To filter the miRNAs associated with stem cell-like properties, a search on various literature in the PubMed database was conducted using the keywords 'miR-xx' and 'stem cells' for each individual miRNA. Based on the literature, miRNAs clearly involved in stem/progenitor cell modulation were collected. Following that, the miRGen database (http://www.diana.pcbi.upenn.edu/miRGen/v3/miRGen.html) was used to predict target genes for selected miRNAs. The Targets interface of the miRGen database provides access to the union and intersection of the four widely used target prediction programs: miRBase, miRanda, TargetScan and PicTar. To obtain reliable target genes, the intersection function (among miRanda, TargetScan and PicTar) was used to predict target genes (Fig. 1). The obtained gene list was further intersected with the target genes above the mean score from the PicTar prediction alone to obtain the final hits for each individual miRNA. Following this process, target genes documented to regulate stem cell-like properties were selected from PubMed.

Statistical analysis

The two-tailed Student's t-test was used to analyze the statistical significance of FACS and RT-PCR data. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results and Discussion

The prevalence of CD44+CD24−/low cells in BrCa cell lines

To test the hypothesis that the prevalence of T-ICs in a BrCa cell population is associated with the metastatic phenotype of the BrCa cells, the proportion of the CD44+CD24−/low subpopulation of cells was assessed in the tumorigenic/metastatic human BrCa cell lines, SUM1315 and MDA-MB-231, and the tumorigenic/non-metastatic human BrCa cell lines, MCF-7 and SUM149, by FACS analysis. Consistent with a previous report (12), the proportion of this subpopulation is relatively higher in SUM1315 (~60%) and MDA-MB-231 cells (>90%) than in MCF-7 and SUM149 ones (0.05 and 3%, respectively; P<0.001) (Fig. 2A and B). The greater percentage of CD44+CD24−/low cells in SUM1315 and MDA-MB-231 cells corresponds with the highly malignant and metastatic phenotypes of these cell lines (13,14). This finding is also consistent with our previous observation that these cell lines possess enhanced propensity to metastasize (9,13).

miRNA expression signature for tumor-initiating properties in BrCa cells

To investigate the role of miRNAs in the maintenance of BrCa T-ICs, total RNAs from MCF-7, SUM1315 and MDA-MB-231 cells were used as representatives to carry out a microarray analysis of miRNAs. The miRNA expression profiling was documented previously (9). There are 86 and 74 miRNAs that are differentially expressed (fold-change >2 or <−2, P<0.05) in MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315 cells compared to MCF-7 cells, respectively, and there are 69 common miRNAs between the 86 and 74 differentially expressed miRNAs (9). Among the 69 miRNAs common to the two cell lines, approximately 46% (n=32) of them have been documented to regulate the stemness of stem/progenitor cells (Table I). The expression changes of miR-22, miR-93 and miR-203 were further validated by qRT-PCR (Fig. 3).

Table I

miRNAs associated with stem cell-like properties.

Table I

miRNAs associated with stem cell-like properties.

miRNAMDA-MB-231 vs. MCF-7 cellsSUM1315 vs. MCF-7 cellsFunction descriptionRepresentative target genes
miR-375↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓Regulates human ES cell differentiation (15)RLF, OTP, INSM1
miR-203↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓Tumor suppressor, and regulates stem cell differentiation (16,17)EDN1
miR-200c↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓Suppresses the ability of normal mammary stem cells to form mammary ducts and tumors (18)FN1, ZFHX1B
miR-7↓↓↓↓↓↓↓Regulates differentiation of germline stem cell lineage (19)COL2A1, GLI3, KLF4
miR-98↓↓↓↓Regulates differentiation of bronchoalveolar stem cells (20)E2F5, HOXA9, SEMA4C
miR-183↓↓ ↓Suppresses expression of stem cell factors in cancer and mouse ES cells (21)ABCA1, LRP6, ITGB1
miR-26b↓↓ ↓Significantly decreased in human ES cells (22)JAG1, NLK, Ezh2
miR-21↓↓Suppresses the self-renewal of ES cells (23)SATB1, RHOB, PITX2
miR-148b↓↓Regulates human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation (24)CANX, CSF1, DNMT1
miR-93Depleted in mammary progenitor cells (25)LATS2, TXNIP, ARID4B
miR-125aRegulates neural differentiation of stem cells (26)TAZ, GPC4, PLAGL2
miR-106bAltered expression in bronchoalveolar stem cells (27)ARID4B, BCL2L2, EPHA4
miR-103Modulates the self-renewal of mesenchymal stem cells (28)BTG2, CDK6
miR-107Modulates the self-renewal of mesenchymal stem cells (28)OGT, RBM24, CDK6
miR-128Promotes neural stem cell self-renewal (29)BMI-1
miR-26aModulates the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (30)SMAD1, HOXA5, JAG1
miR-20aDifferentially expressed in developing mouse embryos, and controls differentiation of stem cells (31)ABCA1, BCL11B, CD69
miR-23bRegulates liver stem cell differentiation by targeting Smads (32)PKNOX1, SRC1, ZIC1
miR-23aIncreased during replication and senescence of human cord blood-derived multipotent stem cells (33)ELF5, SRC1
miR-92bControls the G1/S checkpoint gene p57 in human ES cells (34)p57
miR-24↑ ↑Inhibits endodermal differentiation of human ES cells (35)CDX2
miR-22↑ ↑Highly expressed in mammary progenitor cells (25)LGALS1, PLAGL2, MECP2
miR-19a↑ ↑Up-regulated by activin A in human ES cells (36)CD164, ARHGAP1, WNT3
miR-27a↑ ↑↑ ↑Reduces the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (24)HOXB8, APRIN, SEMA4C
miR-19b↑ ↑↑ ↑Down-regulated by activin A in human ES cells (36)NEUROD1, WNT3, CCNT2
miR-29c↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑Up-regulated in the course of replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells (37)RLF, TRAF4, PHC1
miR-99a↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑ ↑Differentially expressed in human mesenchymal stem cells (38)HOXA1
miR-29a↑ ↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑ ↑Highly expressed in hematopoietic stem cells and down-regulated in hematopoietic progenitors (39)RLF, GDF8, TRAF4
miR-125b↑ ↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑ ↑Critical for the suppression of human glioma stem cell proliferation (40)U251 GPC4, TAZ, MSI1
miR-100↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑Modulates differentiation of mouse ES cells (41)SMARCA5, HOXA1
miR-222↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑Highly expressed at early developmental stages in the embryonic retina (42)MAP3K10, PBX3
miR-221↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑Controls proliferation and differentiation of CD34-positive hematopoietic progenitor cells (43)MAP3K10, CTCF

[i] Fold changes: ↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓, −512 to −256; ↓↓↓↓↓↓↓, −256 to −l128; ↓↓↓↓↓↓, −l128 to −l64; ↓↓↓↓↓, −l64 to −l32; ↓↓↓↓, −l32 to −l16; ↓↓↓, −l16 to −l8; ↓↓, −l8 to −l4; ↓, −l4 to −l2; ↑, 2 to 4; ↑↑, 4–8; ↑↑↑, 8–16; ↑↑↑↑, 16–32; ↑↑↑↑↑, 32–64; ↑↑↑↑↑↑, 64–128; ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑, 128–256; ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑, 256–512; ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑, 512–1024.

A recent study of miRNA expression of mouse mammary progenitor cells revealed a characteristic group of miRNAs: miR-22 and miR-205 are highly expressed, and miR-93 and let-7 are decreased in progenitor cells compared to differentiated cells (25). In agreement with this study, the miRNA profiling data obtained in the present study showed that miR-22 was induced and miR-93 was reduced in MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315 cells compared to MCF-7 cells (Table I and Fig. 3). This result correlates with the high percentage of BrCa T-ICs in MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315 cells (Fig. 2). miR-21, regulated by REST (RE1-silencing transcription factor; also known as NRSF), specifically suppresses the self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells (23). miR-125a, along with let-7, induces stem cell commitment by regulating the expression of the mammalian lin-28 (a marker for pluripotency in ES cells) (26,44) and its expression is significantly increased during the neural differentiation of ES and embryocarcinoma (EC) cells (26,44). The downregulation of miR-21 and miR-125a (Table I) parallels the enriched progenitor cells in MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315 cells compared to MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2). miR-203 has been shown to control the keratinocyte differentiation of epithelial progenitor cells (16) and to be a tumor suppressor (17). This miRNA was depleted in a number of hematopoietic tumors due to hypermethylation, while its re-expression is capable of reducing tumor cell proliferation (17). Its expression was found to be markedly reduced in MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315 cells compared to MCF-7 cells (Table I and Fig. 3). miRNA depletion in metastatic MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315 cells correlates with the more aggressive phenotype of these cells compared to non-metatastic MCF-7 cells (14).

To shed light on the potential role of differentially expressed miRNAs in modulating tumor-initiating features, an analysis of target gene prediction was performed using the online miRGen database. Most miRNAs were predicted to have numerous target genes. miRNAs such as miR-99b, miR-200c and miR-7 have tens of predicted target genes, whereas other miRNAs (e.g., miR-148b, miR-375 and miR-20a) have hundreds of predicted target genes. Representative genes involved in the stemness are shown in Table I. LATS2, a potential target gene of miR-93, is essential for embryonic development, proliferation control and genomic integrity (45). A possible target gene of miR-21, SATB1, contributes to embryonic stem cell differentiation and regulates Nanog expression (46). As a likely target gene of miR-22, PLAGL2 restrains differentiation in neural stem cells (47). Although the published data on miRNA profiles in T-ICs are limited, evidence suggests that certain miRNAs play a significant role in the generation and maintenance of T-ICs. In C. elegans, mutation of lin-4 and let-7 miRNAs results in the generation of stem cell-like cells (48). Mammalian let-7 expression is depleted in human BrCa T-ICs and significantly increased in differentiated cells. Let-7 suppresses self-renewal by targeting H-RAS and induces differentiation by targeting HMGA2 (10). The data from the present study further support the hypothesis that miRNAs are involved in the regulation of BrCa T-ICs. Future studies of the aberrantly expressed miRNAs in BrCa T-ICs may elucidate the mechanisms responsible for tumorigenesis, metastasis and cancer relapse, and may identify therapeutic molecular targets for anti-cancer drug discovery.

Taken together, these results indicate that BrCa cells with a higher prevalence of T-ICs possess distinct miRNA expression profiles that may contribute to the maintenance of stem cell properties. The mechanism by which miRNAs modulate BrCa T-ICs remains unknown. Moreover, our study suggests the potential diagnostic value of the miRNA expression signature in BrCa, including metastasis, although clinical evidence is required to confirm this hypothesis.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the 'Hundred Talents Program', the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-EW-404), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21077128 and 20921063).

Abbreviations:

miRNAs

microRNAs

BrCa

breast cancer

T-ICs

tumor-initiating cells

ES

embryonic stem

EC

embryocarcinoma

FACS

fluorescence-activated cell sorting

RT-PCR

reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

RT

reverse transcription

References

1 

Shipitsin M, Campbell LL, Argani P, et al: Molecular definition of breast tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Cell. 11:259–273. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, et al: Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res. 65:5506–5511. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Deng SCG, Croce CM, Coukos G and Zhang L: Mechanisms of microRNA deregulation in human cancer. Cell Cycle. 7:2643–2646. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Garzon R, Marcucci G and Croce CM: Targeting microRNAs in cancer: rationale, strategies and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 9:775–789. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Suh M-R, Lee Y, Kim JY, et al: Human embryonic stem cells express a unique set of microRNAs. Dev Biol. 270:488–498. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Croce CM and Calin GA: miRNAs, cancer, and stem cell division. Cell. 122:6–7. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bernstein EKS, Carmell MA, Murchison EP, Alcorn H, Li MZ, Mills AA, Elledge SJ, Anderson KV and Hannon GJ: Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nat Genet. 35:215–217. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Kanellopoulou C, Muljo SA, Kung AL, et al: Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev. 19:489–501. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Liu S, Goldstein RH, Scepansky EM and Rosenblatt M: Inhibition of rho-associated kinase signaling prevents breast cancer metastasis to human bone. Cancer Res. 69:8742–8751. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Yu F, Yao H, Zhu P, et al: let-7 regulates self renewal and tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells. Cell. 131:1109–1123. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Liu S, Suragani RN, Wang F, Han A, Zhao W, Andrews NC and Chen JJ: The function of heme-regulated eIF2alpha kinase in murine iron homeostasis and macrophage maturation. J Clin Invest. 117:3296–3305. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Fillmore CM and Kuperwasser C: Human breast cancer cell lines contain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically diverse progeny and survive chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 10:R252008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kuperwasser C, Dessain S, Bierbaum BE, et al: A mouse model of human breast cancer metastasis to human bone. Cancer Res. 65:6130–6138. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kang Y, Siegel PM, Shu W, et al: A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell. 3:537–549. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Hinton A, Afrikanova I, Wilson M, et al: A distinct microRNA signature for definitive endoderm derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells and Dev. 19:797–807. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lena AM, Shalom-Feuerstein R, Di Val Cervo PR, et al: miR-203 represses 'stemness' by repressing [Delta]Np63. Cell Death Differ. 15:1187–1195. 2008.

17 

Bueno MJ, Pérez de Castro I, Gómez de Cedrón M, et al: Genetic and epigenetic silencing of microRNA-203 enhances ABL1 and BCR-ABL1 oncogene expression. Cancer Cell. 13:496–506. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Shimono Y, Zabala M, Cho RW, et al: Downregulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells. Cell. 138:592–603. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Pek JW, Lim AK and Kai T: Drosophila maelstrom ensures proper germline stem cell lineage differentiation by repressing microRNA-7. Dev Cell. 17:417–424. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Mallick B, Ghosh Z and Chakrabarti J: MicroRNome analysis unravels the molecular basis of SARS infection in bronchoalveolar stem cells. PLoS ONE. 4:e78372009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wellner U, Schubert J, Burk UC, et al: The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 11:1487–1495. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Ma Y-L, Zhang P, Wang F, et al: Human embryonic stem cells and metastatic colorectal cancer cells shared the common endogenous human microRNA-26b. J Cell Mol Med. View Article : Google Scholar : (E-pub ahead of print). Accessed September 10, 2010

23 

Singh SK, Kagalwala MN, Parker-Thornburg J, Adams H and Majumder S: REST maintains self-renewal and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature. 453:223–227. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Schoolmeesters A, Eklund T, Leake D, et al: Functional profiling reveals critical role for miRNA in differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS ONE. 4:e56052009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ibarra I, Erlich Y, Muthuswamy SK, Sachidanandam R and Hannon GJ: A role for microRNAs in maintenance of mouse mammary epithelial progenitor cells. Genes Dev. 21:3238–3243. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Rybak A, Fuchs H, Smirnova L, et al: A feedback loop comprising lin-28 and let-7 controls pre-let-7 maturation during neural stem-cell commitment. Nat Cell Biol. 10:987–993. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Qian S, Ding JY, Xie R, et al: MicroRNA expression profile of bronchioalveolar stem cells from mouse lung. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 377:668–673. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Lakshmipathy U and Hart RP: Concise review: microRNA expression in multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cells. 26:356–363. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Godlewski J, Nowicki MO, Bronisz A, et al: Targeting of the Bmi-1 oncogene/stem cell renewal factor by microRNA-128 inhibits glioma proliferation and self-renewal. Cancer Res. 68:9125–9130. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Luzi E, Marini F, Sala SC, Tognarini I, Galli G and Brandi ML: Osteogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells is modulated by the miR-26a targeting of the SMAD1 transcription factor. J Bone Miner Res. 23:287–295. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Foshay KM and Gallicano GI: miR-17 family miRNAs are expressed during early mammalian development and regulate stem cell differentiation. Dev Biol. 326:431–443. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Rogler CE, LeVoci L, Ader T, et al: MicroRNA-23b cluster microRNAs regulate transforming growth factor-beta/bone morphogenetic protein signaling and liver stem cell differentiation by targeting Smads. Hepatology. 50:575–584. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Lee S, Jung J-W, Park S-B, et al: Histone deacetylase regulates high mobility group A2-targeting microRNAs in human cord blood-derived multipotent stem cell aging. Cell Mol Life Sci. 68:325–336. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Sengupta S, Nie J, Wagner RJ, Yang C, Stewart R and Thomson JA: MicroRNA 92b controls the G1/S checkpoint gene p57 in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 27:1524–1528. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Tzur G, Levy A, Meiri E, et al: MicroRNA expression patterns and function in endodermal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE. 3:e37262008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Tsai Z-Y, Singh S, Yu S-L, et al: Identification of microRNAs regulated by activin A in human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 109:93–102. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

37 

Wagner W, Horn P, Castoldi M, et al: Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells: A continuous and organized process. PLoS ONE. 3:e22132008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Wang K-H, Kao A-P, Singh S, et al: Comparative expression profiles of mRNAs and microRNAs among human mesenchymal stem cells derived from breast, face, and abdominal adipose tissues. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 26:113–122. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Han Y-C, Park CY, Bhagat G, et al: microRNA-29a induces aberrant self-renewal capacity in hematopoietic progenitors, biased myeloid development, and acute myeloid leukemia. J Exp Med. 207:475–489. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Shi L, Zhang J, Pan T, et al: MiR-125b is critical for the suppression of human U251 glioma stem cell proliferation. Brain Res. 1312:120–126. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Tarantino C, Paolella G, Cozzuto L, et al: miRNA 34a, 100, and 137 modulate differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. FASEB J. 24:3255–3263. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Decembrini S, Bressan D, Vignali R, et al: MicroRNAs couple cell fate and developmental timing in retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:21179–21184

43 

Poliseno L, Tuccoli A, Mariani L, et al: MicroRNAs modulate the angiogenic properties of HUVECs. Blood. 108:3068–3071. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Wu L and Belasco JG: Micro-RNA regulation of the mammalian lin-28 gene during neuronal differentiation of embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 25:9198–9208. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

McPherson JP, Tamblyn L, Elia A, et al: Lats2/Kpm is required for embryonic development, proliferation control and genomic integrity. Embo J. 23:3677–3688. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Savarese F, Dávila A, Nechanitzky R, et al: Satb1 and Satb2 regulate embryonic stem cell differentiation and Nanog expression. Genes Dev. 23:2625–2638. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Zheng H, Ying H, Wiedemeyer R, et al: PLAGL2 regulates Wnt signaling to impede differentiation in neural stem cells and gliomas. Cancer Cell. 17:497–509. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Reinhart BJ, Slack FJ, Basson M, et al: The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 403:901–906. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January 2012
Volume 3 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang L, Zhang D, Zhang C, Zhang S, Wang Z, Qu C and Liu S: A microRNA expression signature characterizing the properties of tumor-initiating cells for breast cancer. Oncol Lett 3: 119-124, 2012.
APA
Wang, L., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., Qu, C., & Liu, S. (2012). A microRNA expression signature characterizing the properties of tumor-initiating cells for breast cancer. Oncology Letters, 3, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.431
MLA
Wang, L., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., Qu, C., Liu, S."A microRNA expression signature characterizing the properties of tumor-initiating cells for breast cancer". Oncology Letters 3.1 (2012): 119-124.
Chicago
Wang, L., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Wang, Z., Qu, C., Liu, S."A microRNA expression signature characterizing the properties of tumor-initiating cells for breast cancer". Oncology Letters 3, no. 1 (2012): 119-124. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.431