Changes in blood concentrations of trace metals in cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 24, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.789
- Pages: 737-744
Abstract
Introduction
Cisplatin (CDDP) is one of the most potent anticancer therapeutic agents in clinical use. It is applied in the treatment of various common types of solid tumor found in tissues, such as the esophagus and the lungs. However, CDDP is frequently associated with renal tubular dysfunction and cumulative impairment in renal function is a dose-limiting factor in the administration of this anticancer agent (1,2). The mechanism of CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity is not completely understood. However, the primary cause of dysfunction is considered to be the high concentration of CDDP uptake into renal cells, particularly renal proximal tubular cells, relative to other tissues (3,4). Moreno-Gordaliza et al (5) performed fertility laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry bioimaging analysis, which demonstrated that platinum (Pt) displaced zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) within renal cells of CDDP-treated rats. This result indicates the possibility of limited tissue distribution of these types of metal and consequent changes in their blood levels in the early phase of CDDP-based chemotherapy. Additionally, there is the possibility that CDDP administration influences the concentrations of other metals in body fluids. However, there is little information regarding time-concentration profiles of trace metals during CDDP-based chemotherapy.
The aim of the present study was to determined the plasma levels of trace metals, including manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), Cu, Zn, and lead (Pb) in Japanese esophageal and lung cancer patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy.
Materials and methods
Patients and blood samples
The protocol for the current study was approved by Ethics Committee of Kobe University Hospital (Kobe, Japan). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the start of the study. Eight patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant CDDP-based chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma at Kobe University Hospital (February 2011 to July 2011). The clinical characteristics of the patients in the current study are presented in Table I. The study protocols of CDDP-based chemotherapy and blood sampling for esophageal cancer patients (patients 1–5) and lung cancer patients (patients 6–8) are presented in Fig. 1. The CDDP-based chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma consisted of a 2-h drip infusion of 80 mg/m2 CDDP (Maruko cisplatin for i.v. infusion; Yakult, Tokyo, Japan) on day 1 and a 5-day protracted venous infusion of 800 mg/m2 per day fluorouracil on days 1–5. For lung adenocarcinoma, treatment consisted of a 2-h drip infusion of 75 mg/m2 CDDP and 500 mg/m2 pemetrexed (Alimta® Injection; Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN, USA) on day 1. The patients received appropriate hydration and antiemetic premedication consisting of 1 mg granisetron (Granisetron intravenous solution; Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Tokyo, Japan) on day 1, 6.6 mg dexamethasone (DEXART® injection; Fuji Pharma Co., Toyama, Japan) on day 1 and 3.3 mg dexamethasone on days 2 and 3), and 125 mg aprepitant (EMEND® Capsule; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Osaka, Japan) on day 1 and 80 mg aprepitant on days 2 and 3. One esophageal cancer patient (patient 1) received 0.75 mg palonosetron (Aloxi® i.v. injection; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan) on day 1 rather than granisetron. This patient had anemia and required a single red blood cell transfusion on day 1. Subsequently, the patient took oral iron pills every day during the observation period.
Table I.Patient characteristics and baseline values of laboratory tests and plasma trace metals in patients with esophageal and lung cancer. |
Peripheral venous blood (5 ml) was drawn at 6–10 time-points from each patient into duplicate tubes, either containing or not containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The first blood sample was taken 1–3 days after the start of the CDDP infusion, and samples were taken at 2- to 16-day intervals thereafter. Baseline measurements were taken one day before or at the start of CDDP administration. Blood samples containing EDTA were immediately centrifuged at room temperature (18–25°C) for 10 min at 1,900 × g to provide a plasma sample for the determination of plasma concentrations of trace metals, and samples without EDTA were used for routine and additional laboratory tests. The time-blood concentration profiles of Pt in the five patients with esophageal cancer were assessed during chemotherapy in our previous study (6), and the plasma samples of the study were reanalyzed during the present study for trace metal analysis. The variability in plasma concentrations of trace metals during the observation period were assessed as fold-increases relative to the baseline level. To minimize confounding influences from circadian variations in trace metal concentrations and clinical laboratory tests, the serum sampling was performed in the fasted state, and always at 5:30 a.m., to obtain samples for the additional clinical laboratory tests. Serum Fe, magnesium, ferritin, and transferrin were analyzed in accordance with standard biochemical methods at LSI Medience Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). The plasma and serum samples were stored at −40°C prior to testing.
Determination of plasma concentrations of trace metals
The concentrations of trace metals in plasma were determined as described previously (6). Briefly, each sample (50 µl) was reduced to ash by repeated treatment with nitric acid [for poisonous metal determination; Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan)], hydrogen peroxide (for atomic absorption spectrochemical analysis; Wako) and perchloric acid (for poisonous metal determination; Wako) at 200°C. Sample ash was dissolved in 5 ml of 5% nitric acid and analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using Agilent 7700x ICP-MS (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The levels of Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Pt and Pb (m/z=55, 56, 59, 63, 66, 195 and 208, respectively) were determined in two or three replicates per sample. Contamination from tubes and other sources was avoided. The trace metal concentrations in each sample were calculated using linear regression of the standard curves prepared using standard solutions of the respective trace metals. The standard curves exhibited linear regression in the range of 1–500 ng/ml (r=0.999) and the limit of quantification was 0.1 ng/ml.
Measurement of serum levels of Fe, magnesium, ferritin and transferrin
Serum levels of Fe, magnesium and transferrin were measured using a colorimetric assay (Quick Auto Neo Fe; Shino-Test Corp., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturers' instructions, an emzymatic assay (IATRO LQ Mg rate II; LSI Medience Corp.) and a turbidimetric immunoassay (N-Assay TIA Tf-H Nittobo; Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), respectively, with an automated clinical chemistry analyzer (System H7700; Hitachi High-Tequnologies Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The serum ferritin level was measured using a chemiluminiscent immunoassay (Chemilumi ACS-Ferritin II; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan) with a Chemilumi ADVIA Centaur (Siemens Healthcare diagnostics). The results were routinely validated to confirm acceptable precision and accuracy.
Statistical analysis
The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the individual plasma Pt concentration-time curve as described previously (6). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median and quartile range. Fisher's exact test and Welch's test were used for statistical analysis of the two groups. The differences in rates of change, for raw or mean values from individual laboratory tests, between baseline and treatment days after initiation of chemotherapy were evaluated using Steel-Dwass multiple comparison test. Two-tailed P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Patient characteristics and baseline values of the laboratory tests and plasma trace metals
Serum albumin levels in patients with esophageal cancer were identified to be significantly lower than those of the lung cancer patients (P=0.042), whereas no significant difference in renal and hepatic function indices were identified between the two groups (Table I). In addition, no significant difference was identified between the groups in red and white blood cell counts, platelet counts or in the hemoglobin and C-reactive protein levels in the blood. The mean ± SD baseline plasma concentration of 56Fe in patients with esophageal cancer was 1,719±369 ng/ml, and the value was significantly lower than that in lung cancer patients (2,419±118 ng/ml; P=0.011). No significant differences in the mean values of other trace metals were identified between the esophageal and lung cancer patients. The baseline plasma concentrations of 195Pt and those of 59Co at almost all sampling points were below the limit of quantification.
Time-plasma concentrations of trace metals
Fig. 2 demonstrated the time-plasma concentrations of trace metals in eight patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy. The fold-change values of the plasma concentrations from baseline were in the range 0.1–5.5 for 55Mn, 0.6–1.9 for 56Fe, 0.7–2.3 for 63Cu, 0.3–3.9 for 66Zn, and 0.4–10.0 for 208Pb during the observation period. When the plasma Pt concentrations were calculated by adjusting for the CDDP dose at the start of the treatment in patients with esophageal and lung cancer (6) there was a statistically significant difference between their mean ± SD values [6.8±0.8 and 8.7±0.9 ng ml−1 (mg CDDP)−1, respectively; P=0.044]. No significant difference in the elimination rate constant and half-life was identified between the esophageal and lung cancer patients.
Variability of plasma trace metal concentrations
Fig. 3 shows the variability of plasma trace metal concentrations during the observation period. To minimize confounding influences of circadian variation and supplemental treatment on trace metal levels, two patients were excluded from the analysis: One lung cancer patient had consumed food prior to baseline blood sampling, and another patient with esophageal cancer required a single red blood cell transfusion and had taken oral iron pills. For the six patients included, the variability of plasma concentrations of trace metals during the observation period was assessed (Fig. 3). In these patients, the plasma concentrations of 56Fe and 66Zn increased during the 1–3 days following the start of CDDP treatment. Subsequently, the plasma concentrations of 56Fe declined to baseline levels by around the tenth day for all patients, whereas 66Zn plasma concentrations changed gradually during the observation period. Plasma concentrations of other trace metals (55Mn, 63Cu and 208Pb) did not exhibit any characteristic changes.
Variability of laboratory test values
In the six patients, the median (interquartile range) baseline serum levels of Fe, magnesium, ferritin and transferrin were 67.0 (61.0–93.3) µg/100 ml, 2.4 (2.3–2.5) mg/100 ml, 104.9 (73.8–151.5) ng/ml, and 208.0 (191.0–237.8) mg/100 ml, respectively. When serum Fe levels were determined by the colorimetric method, its transient elevation, similar to that of 56Fe determined by the ICP-MS method, was observed more clearly (Fig. 4A). Serum magnesium levels were also determined enzymatically and had a tendency to decrease during the observation period, although this was not statistically significant (Fig. 4B). The serum levels of ferritin significantly increased on days 1–3 (P=0.018), and this increase was sustained until at least 10 days after CDDP treatment (Fig. 4C). Serum transferrin levels tended to be below the baseline levels at days 1–11 and on days 1–3 exhibited a significant difference (Fig. 4D; P=0.018). The median (interquartile range) baseline values of red blood cells and hemoglobin were 406 (395–429) × 104 cells/µl and 13.1 (12.0–13.5) g/100 ml, respectively. These values showed a similar pattern of change during the observation period, exhibiting a marginal decrease on days 1–3 and a significant decrease approximately one month after CDDP treatment (Fig. 4E and F; P<0.05).
Time-concentration profiles of plasma cystatin C and serum creatinine levels
In our previous study, the transient elevation of the plasma concentration of cystatin C following CDDP treatment was observed in patients with esophageal cancer (6). In the present study, the plasma concentration profiles were evaluated in three patients with lung cancer in addition to patients with esophageal cancer (Fig. 5). Two lung cancer patients exhibited 1.29- and 1.39-fold increases in plasma cystatin C levels on days 1–3, compared with their baseline levels, and these levels subsequently returned to baseline within approximately one week. The other patient also demonstrated a similar tendency, exhibiting a 1.3-fold increase in plasma cystatin C levels after CDDP treatment (0.66 and 0.87 mg/l on days 1 and 5, respectively), although in this patient, baseline blood sampling was performed in the non-fasted state and, therefore, the level was 0.86 mg/l. The change rates of serum creatinine levels in two patients were between 0.86 and 1.06 during the present observation period, based on their baseline levels, whereas the value in the other patient increased gradually by ~1.3.
Discussion
Trace metals including Fe, Zn, and Cu exist widely in the body and are important in the maintenance of physiological homeostasis. Fe is required for adequate erythropoietic function (oxygen transport and storage), oxidative metabolism, and cellular immune response (7). Zn is required for general metabolism, and catalytic, structural and regulatory functions (8), and Cu is required for Fe metabolism, antioxidant defense, neuropeptide synthesis, and immune function (9). In the present study, serum concentrations of 55Mn, 56Fe, 63Cu, 66Zn, 59Co and 208Pb were determined in esophageal and lung cancer patients (Table I). In lung cancer patients who had not undergone cancer chemotherapy, the results demonstrated that serum levels of 55Mn, 56Fe, 63Cu and 208Pb were in approximately the same range, whereas 66Zn levels were beyond the range of values reported previously (10–14). The differences in trace metal concentrations may be partly explained by the different measurement methods that were used; atomic absorption spectrophotometry and ICP-MS. In the esophageal cancer patients of the present study, the baseline serum levels of 56Fe and 66Zn were apparently in the same range as that which was reported in a previous study on preoperative esophageal cancer patients (15). The levels of 55Mn, 59Co, 63Cu, 66Zn and 208Pb were comparable with values in the lung cancer patients while the 56Fe levels were significantly lower. This may have been due to the anemia-associated lowering of values of serum ferritin and hemoglobin, as well as of serum Fe levels in one esophageal cancer patient, although it was unclear whether the other patients exhibited gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
Pt is a heavy metal and a constituent atom of CDDP, and there is a possibility that the administration of CDDP influences the trace metal concentrations in body fluids. Among the metals evaluated in the present study, the time-concentration profile of 56Fe indicated that its plasma concentration was increased subsequent to CDDP treatment and returned to the baseline level within ~10 days. The current study, however, included two patients who had anemia or were in a non-fasted condition and, therefore, the blood transfusion, and consumption of iron tablets and a meal were considered as confounding factors. In order to eliminate these, the plasma levels of 56Fe and other metals from data of all but these two patients were evaluated. The analysis yielded results that indicated a significant increase in plasma 56Fe and 66Zn levels in the 1–3 days following CDDP treatment (Fig. 3). In addition, the serum Fe levels were evaluated using a colorimetric method, which more clearly confirmed the same tendency (Fig. 4A). This may be due to the difference in ability to remove the Fe from the serum proteins between chelating and ashing. Fe in the body is largely stored in erythrocyte hemoglobin, and the liver and spleen are also Fe-rich tissues (16). As shown in Fig. 4E and F, red blood cell counts and hemoglobin levels have a tendency to decrease, which may contribute to the elevation of serum Fe levels, although the difference was not statistically significant. Ferritin is one of the proteins that stores Fe in the tissues. In the current study, its serum level increases gradually after CDDP treatment and continues to increase even after the serum Fe levels pass their peak. In addition, transferrin is important to Fe homeostasis, as it is involved in the transportation of Fe between the bloodstream and tissues. A significant decline in transferrin levels accompanied the increase in serum Fe and ferritin, although the capacity of transferrin to store Fe is markedly lower than that of ferritin from a stoichiometric viewpoint. These findings indicate that the change in serum ferritin and transferrin levels was a secondary reaction against excessive Fe in the bloodstream. In esophageal patients undergoing CDDP-based chemotherapy, Akutsu et al (17) demonstrated the decreased serum Cu and Mn levels and the marginal change in serum Fe and Zn levels, although the methodology used to measure the trace metals was not clear. The variations detected were markedly different when compared with those of the present study, which may be due to the differing nutritional status of the patients; in the former study, patients received total parenteral nutrition, but not in the present study. Overall, although the present pilot study was limited by its small sample size in each type of cancer and combined chemotherapeutic agent, it was concluded that the transient elevation in serum Fe levels after CDDP treatment is not completely explained by destruction of red blood cells and/or ferritin, and further studies are required to address this issue.
As shown in Fig. 3, the plasma concentration of 66Zn in esophageal and lung cancer patients without blood transfusion or meal intake was increased on days 1–3 after the CDDP treatment and, subsequently, varied without a certain tendency. By contrast, Sweeney et al (14) reported that a decrease in plasma Zn following CDDP administration, which was accompanied by an increase in urinary Zn excretion, and diurnal variation in plasma Zn level were observed in the head and neck, and lung cancer patients. The authors also discussed the possibility of the release of intracellular Zn by tumor lysis following CDDP administration, which would lead to an increase in plasma Zn concentration (14). Additionally, it was reported that, in CDDP-treated rat kidneys, Zn that was bound to proteins within cells could be displaced by Pt, although the serum Zn levels were not clearly known (5). In the present study, Zn possibly derived from the kidneys may be involved in the increase in plasma Zn levels immediately following CDDP treatment. However, the extent to which that contributes to the change in plasma Zn levels remains obscure, and therefore, further studies are warranted to appropriately investigate this possibility.
Cystatin C is one of the endogenous markers of the glomerular filtration rate (18–20), but the efficacy of blood cystatin C level for detection of renal dysfunction during CDDP-based chemotherapy remains controversial (21–23). In our previous study, a transient elevation of serum cystatin C concentration, perhaps independently of renal function, was observed in esophageal cancer patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy (6). In the present study, two lung cancer patients exhibited an increase in the plasma cystatin C concentration within a week after the CDDP treatment, followed by a subsequent return to baseline levels (Fig. 5). Another lung cancer patient also appeared to exhibit a similar tendency, although this patient did not fast for the baseline blood sampling (Fig. 5). These findings were in close agreement with our previous results, and indicated a possible underestimation of renal function based on plasma cystatin C levels during the early CDDP treatment period, regardless of whether the cancer was of the lung or the esophagus (6). Prospective and larger clinical studies are required to confirm these findings.
As mentioned above, a transient elevation was observed in serum Fe levels, and this change appeared to be parallel to that of plasma cystatin C levels (Figs. 2, 3, 4A and 5). In patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy, antiemetic therapeutic agents, including dexamethasone are administered to prevent treatment-associated nausea and vomiting (24), while dexamethasone has the potential to induce the secretion of cystatin C from cancer cell lines (25,26). It was reported that an increase in serum Fe levels and a decrease in total Fe binding capacity calculated based on serum transferrin levels were observed only during an anti-inflammatory period induced by the administration of prednisolone in an experimental dog study (27). If dexamethasone exerted an effect similar to that of prednisolone immediately after initiating CDDP-based chemotherapy, the increase in serum Fe levels may reflect the phenomenon of anti-inflammation induced by dexamethasone. Although it remains unclear whether the extracellular release of Fe is correlated with that of cystatin C and whether Fe influences the measurement system of cystatin C, the evaluation of renal function based on serum levels of not only cystatin C, but also Fe, would be more reliable during the early CDDP treatment period.
The progressive decline in magnesium levels with each successive cycle of chemotherapy has been reported in patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy (28). In the present study, serum magnesium levels tended to decrease after the start of chemotherapy and its median level at the end of the observation period was 0.92 (quartile range, 0.87–0.99) of the baseline level (Fig. 4B). The value was comparable with those in previous reports (28,29). Furthermore, the protective effect of magnesium supplementation and the preventive effect of magnesium preloading on nephrotoxicity in cancer patients receiving CDDP-based chemotherapy have been reported (30,31); therefore, the underlying mechanisms may become clearer through examination of the effect of Fe, released by CDDP treatment, on serum and tissue magnesium levels.
In conclusion, these findings suggest that serum Fe, Zn and magnesium levels may be useful in understanding the physiological responses in the early stages of CDDP-based chemotherapy, which may be associated with systemic inflammation and/or tissue distribution of CDDP.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant nos. 26460245 and 16K08908). In addition, it was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities, 2012-2016 (grant no. S1201008).
References
Madias NE and Harrington JT: Platinum nephrotoxicity. Am J Med. 65:307–314. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kintzel PE and Dorr RT: Anticancer drug renal toxicity and elimination: Dosing guidelines for altered renal function. Cancer Treat Rev. 21:33–64. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Filipski KK, Mathijssen RH, Mikkelsen TS, Schinkel AH and Sparreboom A: Contribution of organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) to cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 86:396–402. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakamura T, Yonezawa A, Hashimoto S, Katsura T and Inui K: Disruption of multidrug and toxin extrusion MATE1 potentiates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Biochem Pharmacol. 80:1762–1767. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moreno-Gordaliza E, Giesen C, Lázaro A, Esteban-Fernández D, Humanes B, Cañas B, Panne U, Tejedor A, Jakubowski N and Gómez-Gómez MM: Elemental bioimaging in kidney by LA-ICP-MS as a tool to study nephrotoxicity and renal protective strategies in cisplatin therapies. Anal Chem. 83:7933–7940. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kume M, Yasui H, Yoshikawa Y, Horinouchi M, Higashiguchi K, Kobayashi Y, Kuroda D, Hirano T, Hirai M and Nakamura T: Transient elevation of serum cystatin C concentrations during perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 69:1537–1544. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Muñoz M, García-Erce JA and Remacha AF: Disorders of iron metabolism. Part 1: Molecular basis of iron homoeostasis. J Clin Pathol. 64:281–286. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chasapis CT, Loutsidou AC, Spiliopoulou CA and Stefanidou ME: Zinc and human health: An update. Arch Toxicol. 86:521–534. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bost M, Houdart S, Oberli M, Kalonji E, Huneau JF and Margaritis I: Dietary copper and human health: Current evidence and unresolved issues. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 35:107–115. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cobanoglu U, Demir H, Sayir F, Duran M and Mergan D: Some mineral, trace element and heavy metal concentrations in lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 11:1383–1388. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zowczak M, Iskra M, Torliński L and Cofta S: Analysis of serum copper and zinc concentrations in cancer patients. Biol Trace Elem Res. 82:1–8. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Díez M, Arroyo M, Cerdàn FJ, Muñoz M, Martin MA and Balibrea JL: Serum and tissue trace metal levels in lung cancer. Oncology. 46:230–234. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Issell BF, MacFadyen BV, Gum ET, Valdivieso M, Dudrick SJ and Bodey GP: Serum zinc levels in lung cancer patients. Cancer. 47:1845–1848. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sweeney JD, Ziegler P, Pruet C and Spaulding MB: Hyperzincuria and hypozincemia in patients treated with cisplatin. Cancer. 63:2093–2095. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang LS, Lin HY, Chang CJ, Fahn HJ, Huang MH and Lin CF: Effects of en bloc esophagectomy on nutritional and immune status in patients with esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 67:90–98. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ganz T: Systemic iron homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 93:1721–1741. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Akutsu Y, Kono T, Uesato M, Hoshino I, Murakami K, Fujishiro T, Imanishi S, Endo S, Toyozumi T and Matsubara H: Are additional trace elements necessary in total parenteral nutrition for patients with esophageal cancer receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy? Biol Trace Elem Res. 150:109–115. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Filler G, Bökenkamp A, Hofmann W, Le Bricon T, Martínez-Brú C and Grubb A: Cystatin C as a marker of GFR-history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem. 38:1–8. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Newman DJ: Cystatin C. Ann Clin Biochem. 39:89–104. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chew JS, Saleem M, Florkowski CM and George PM: Cystatin C - a paradigm of evidence based laboratory medicine. Clin Biochem Rev. 29:47–62. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Oc MA, Demir H, Cekmen MB, Isgoren S, Gorur GD and Bilgili U: Correlation of Cystatin-C and radionuclidic measurement method of glomerular filtration rate in patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin treatment. Ren Fail. 36:1043–1050. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kos FT, Sendur MA, Aksoy S, Sezer S, Civelek B, Yazici O, Yaman S, Eren T and Zengin N: Evaluation of the renal function using cystatin C level in the patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Ren Fail. 35:705–710. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bodnar L, Wcislo GB, Smoter M, Gasowska-Bodnar A, Stec R, Synowiec A and Szczylik C: Cystatin C as a parameter of glomerular filtration rate in patients with ovarian cancer. Kidney Blood Press Res. 33:360–367. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, Feyer P, Clark-Snow R, Koeller JM, Morrow GR, Chinnery LW, Chesney MJ, Gralla RJ, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in oncology: Update 2006. J Clin Oncol. 24:2932–2947. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bjarnadóttir M, Grubb A and Olafsson I: Promoter-mediated, dexamethasone-induced increase in cystatin C production by HeLa cells. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 55:617–623. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yamawaki C, Takahashi M, Takara K, Kume M, Hirai M, Yasui H and Nakamura T: Effect of dexamethasone on extracellular secretion of cystatin C in cancer cell lines. Biomed Rep. 1:115–118. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Adamama-Moraitou KK, Saridomichelakis MN, Polizopoulou Z, Kritsepi M, Tsompanakou A and Koutinas AF: Short-term exogenous glucocorticosteroidal effect on iron and copper status in canine leishmaniasis (Leishmania infantum). Can J Vet Res. 69:287–292. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hodgkinson E, Neville-Webbe HL and Coleman RE: Magnesium depletion in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 18:710–718. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abbasciano V, Mazzotta D, Vecchiatti G, Tassinari D, Nielsen I and Sartori S: Changes in serum, erythrocyte, and urinary magnesium after a single dose of cisplatin combination chemotherapy. Magnes Res. 4:123–125. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bodnar L, Wcislo G, Gasowska-Bodnar A, Synowiec A, Szarlej-Wcisło K and Szczylik C: Renal protection with magnesium subcarbonate and magnesium sulphate in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy: A randomised phase II study. Eur J Cancer. 44:2608–2614. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshida T, Niho S, Toda M, Goto K, Yoh K, Umemura S, Matsumoto S, Ohmatsu H and Ohe Y: Protective effect of magnesium preloading on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: A retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 44:346–354. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |