Open Access

Comparative analysis of two retinal fractures with ultrabroad‑angle fundus photography systems

  • Authors:
    • Yong Guo
    • Hong Yan
    • Chenjun Guo
    • Jue Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 4, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1722
  • Article Number: 34
  • Copyright: © Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of the Opel Panorama 200 and Zeiss Clarus 500 (Carl Zeiss AG) systems in diagnosing retinal fractures. Human subjects were selected from 298 fundus examinations (531 eyes) in ophthalmology from February 2021 to June 2021, including 68 patients with retinal fissures (95 eyes). All fundus tests were performed with Opel Panoramic 200. Zeiss Clarus 500 (Carl Zeiss AG) fundus photography, slit‑lamp full retinal lens (Ocular Mainster Wide Field; Ocular Instruments), and retinal laser photocoagulation was performed for all affected eyes. The diagnostic sensitivity of the two examination methods was compared, and their sensitivities for posterior retina, peripheral nose, crystal eye, cataract, positive experiment, and myopia testing were compared. In all, 68 patients (95 eyes) were clinically examined and treated 112 laser times. For retinal fractures, the Opel Panorama 200 used a check sensitivity of 89.5%, and the Clarus 500 check had a sensitivity of 94.7%, with the difference being non‑significant (P=0.358). Moreover, Clarus 500 diagnosed the sensitivity of the temporal periphery significantly higher than that of Opel Panorama 200 (P=0.048). Opel Panorama 200 displayed statistically significant sensitivity compared with Clarus 500 diagnosis with crystalline and crystal fewer eyes (P>0.05); Clarus 500 sensitivity for cataract diagnosis (crystal turbidity level 3 and above) was significantly higher than that of Opel Panorama 200 (P=0.033). Opel Panoramic 200 displayed significant sensitivity to ocular myopia and medium to moderate myopia (P>0.05). Clarus 500 diagnosed high myopia with a significantly higher sensitivity than Opel Panorama 200 (P=0.045). Opel Panorama 200 and Zeiss Clarus 500 displayed the same level of sensitivity to retinal fissures, with improved sensitivity in refractive turbidity and for retinal fissures located in the far periphery of the temporal side.
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2024
Volume 20 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Guo Y, Yan H, Guo C and Wang J: Comparative analysis of two retinal fractures with ultrabroad‑angle fundus photography systems. Biomed Rep 20: 34, 2024.
APA
Guo, Y., Yan, H., Guo, C., & Wang, J. (2024). Comparative analysis of two retinal fractures with ultrabroad‑angle fundus photography systems. Biomedical Reports, 20, 34. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1722
MLA
Guo, Y., Yan, H., Guo, C., Wang, J."Comparative analysis of two retinal fractures with ultrabroad‑angle fundus photography systems". Biomedical Reports 20.2 (2024): 34.
Chicago
Guo, Y., Yan, H., Guo, C., Wang, J."Comparative analysis of two retinal fractures with ultrabroad‑angle fundus photography systems". Biomedical Reports 20, no. 2 (2024): 34. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1722