Open Access

Association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia as defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus in older outpatients at a hospital specializing in geriatric medicine: A cross‑sectional study with baseline data of prospective cohort study (JUSTICE‑TOKYO study)

  • Authors:
    • Daisuke Asaoka
    • Koji Sugano
    • Kei Matsuno
    • Nobuto Shibata
    • Hideki Sugiyama
    • Noemi Endo
    • Yoshiyuki Iwase
    • Miyuki Tajima
    • Naoko Sakuma
    • Megumi Inoue
    • Mariko Nagata
    • Taeko Mizutani
    • Mizuki Ishii
    • Sachi Iida
    • Yoshiko Miura
    • Yuji Nishizaki
    • Naotake Yanagisawa
    • Akihito Nagahara
    • Katsumi Miyauchi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 25, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1811
  • Article Number: 123
  • Copyright: © Asaoka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

To the best of our knowledge, little is known about the association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia in university‑affiliated geriatric hospital in elderly. The present study aimed to investigate, in a multidisciplinary setting, the prevalence of sarcopenia and association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia in older outpatients at Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center (Tokyo, Japan). Between October 2020 and December 2021, a cross‑sectional study of outpatients aged ≥65 years [458 male (44%) and 584 female (56%); mean age, 78.2±6.1 years] was conducted to assess prevalence of sarcopenia, according to Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria, and the relationship between dietary variety status and sarcopenia. Patient profile, comorbidities, drug use, neuropsychological data, abdominal symptoms, pulmonary function and dietary variety status were collected. Of 1,042 subjects, there were 223 (21.4%) with [142 male (63.7%) and 81 female (36.3%); mean age, 80.6±6.3 years] and 819 (78.6%) without sarcopenia [316 male (38.6%) and 503 female (61.4%); mean age, 77.6±5.8]. In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, low body mass index, high Brinkman Index and phase angle, low quality of life, history of daycare use, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis and low Mini‑Mental State Examination and Dietary Variety Score were related to sarcopenia. The prevalence of sarcopenia was higher in than in community‑dwelling individuals. Dietary variety status was associated with sarcopenia.

Introduction

Defined as loss of skeletal muscle mass in old age, sarcopenia is associated with a risk of physical disability, decreased quality of life (QOL) and increased mortality (1). In Japan, because the population is rapidly aging, sarcopenia is an important consideration when contemplating measures to increase the healthy longevity of older people and prevent requirements for nursing care. According to meta-analysis (2), the sarcopenia prevalence in individuals aged >60 years depends on the set of classification criteria used as follows: European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP) 2, 10; EWGSOP, 23; AWGS (the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia), 14; International Working Group on Sarcopenia, 14; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, 12 and muscle mass definition, 27%, respectively. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) was established in 2014(3) and renamed the AWGS 2019 Consensus. Several studies have reported that sarcopenia prevalence ranges from 7 to 8% (4,5) in Asian countries, but varies widely across study design, population and settings. To the best of our knowledge, few previous reports have focused on the association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia in older outpatients at a university-affiliated geriatric hospital in Japan (6).

The aim of this study was to investigate, in a multidisciplinary context, the prevalence of AWGS 2019 consensus-defined sarcopenia and its association with dietary variety status in older outpatients at a university-affiliated geriatric hospital.

Materials and methods

Study design

The present single-center, cross-sectional study used the baseline data of prospective cohort study Juntendo Sarcopenia Registration of Exploring for Predictors and Prognosis in the elderly in Tokyo (JUSTICE-TOKYO) (7), in accordance with the guidelines contained in the STROBE Checklist (8).

The JUSTICE-TOKYO study is a prospective, observational cohort study of consecutive outpatients aged ≥65 years attending Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. The study enrolled 1,042 patients between November 2020 and November 2021 and will be completed in 2025. The participants will be followed up annually for 4 years after enrollment to determine survival, incidence of falls, number of hospitalizations and skeletal muscle mass. At enrollment, baseline data including patient profile [age, body mass index (BMI), Brinkman Index (BI), drinking habits, sex, history of falls, daycare use, social frailty, phase angle (PhA) and QOL], comorbidities, questionnaires [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15), Abdominal symptom-related QOL (Izumo scale) scores, constipation scoring system (CSS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT)] (9-13), physical and skeletal muscle mass, physiological function test and nutritional assessment data were collected and entered prospectively into the Research Electronic Data Capture system, which provides web-based software for the creation of secure online forms (14).

Exclusion criteria

Patients were excluded for the following reasons: i) Inability to walk independently because of severe osteoarthritis or neuromuscular disease, ii) immobility, iii) delirium tremens at presentation, iv) history of gastrointestinal, renal, acute cerebrovascular, coronary, hepatic and respiratory events, v) inability to be interviewed by questionnaire and vi) predicted life expectancy <1 year because of malignant disease.

Research instruments

Inclusion was limited to patients whose information at registration included all of the following:

i) Age, body mass index (BMI), Brinkman Index (BI) (15), drinking habits (0, rarely drinks alcohol; 1, drinks alcohol 1-4 days/week and 2, drinks alcohol 5-7 days/week), sex, history of falls and daycare use, social frailty, phase angle (PhA) and quality of life assessed by EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) (16-18). Social frailty was assessed using questions regarding living alone, going out less frequently compared with the prior year, visiting friends sometimes, feeling helpful to friends or family and talking with someone every day. Resistances to a multi-frequency alternating current applied to the trunk, arms and legs were measured to determine body composition and impedance characteristics, including capacitive reactance and PhA, were analyzed by an MC-780A body composition analyzer (TANITA Corporation). PhA was calculated as follows: [- arc tangent (reactance/resistance) x180˚/π] (19). PhA represents resistance of the cell membrane, the volume of somatic cells and the distribution of intra- and extracellular fluid; higher PhA generally indicates good cell health, while lower value of PhA reflects structural damage to the cell membrane and decreased cell density, indicating poor cell function (20). Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) standard method for measuring an appendicular skeletal muscle mass in sarcopenia was used (21). PhA cannot be measured by the DXA method but can be measured by the BIA (Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis) method to investigate whether PhA is associated with sarcopenia in older outpatients (22). QOL was evaluated by EQ-VAS (0=worst health, 100=perfect health), commonly used in primary care. Anthropocentric measures, physiological performance test, walking speed, and various questionnaires [(Izumo scale), constipation scoring system (CSS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT), Dietary Variety Score (DVS)] (11-13,23) were conducted by nurses and nutritionists.

ii) Comorbidities [history of atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction/hemorrhage, diabetes mellitus (DM), hospitalization for heart failure, hypertension, interstitial pneumonia, malignant disease, myocardial infarction and osteoporosis]. The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was calculated for each patient (24,25). T-score and young adult mean (YAM) % were measured by DXA of the total hip and lumbar spine (L2-L4). Prodigy Advance scanner (GE Healthcare) was used to perform DXA. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in accordance with Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research criteria (26).

iii) Use of therapeutic agents (statins, acid secretion suppressants, laxatives, steroids, analgesics, antidementia drugs, antipsychotic drugs) and number of oral medicines. Data on medications and number of oral medicines were obtained by pharmacists from patient health notebooks.

iv) Neuropsychological examinations [Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)] (9,10) were performed by psychiatrists.

v) Abdominal symptom-related QOL (Izumo scale) scores (constipation-, diarrhea-, fullness-, reflux- and upper abdominal pain-related QOL) (11). QOL impairment was ranked from 0 (no impairment) to 15 (symptomatic).

vi) Severity of constipation was rated using the constipation scoring system (CSS) (12), comprised of eight items: Abdominal pain, assistance for evacuation, duration of constipation, frequency of bowel movements, incomplete evacuation, length of time/attempt, number of unsuccessful attempts at evacuation/24 h and painful evacuation. The overall CSS score, which is the sum of the item scores, ranged from 0 to 30, with a higher score signifying constipation symptoms were worse. Gastroenterologists performed the constipation severity assessments using CSS and Izumo scales.

vii) Pulmonary function data [arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT)] results, restricted and obstructive ventilatory impairment) (13,27). The 8-item CAT was used to assess the impact of COPD on health status. CAT score ≥10 indicated a high symptomatic level. Pulmonary function tests including vital capacity (VC), forced VC (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) were performed on a Minato System 21 (Minato Medical Science Co., Ltd.). The pulmonary function tests, CAT and eating assessment test 10 (EAT10) (28) were evaluated by a respiratory physician.

viii) Nutritional status [hypozincemia, controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, DVS)] (23,29). Hypozincemia was defined as requiring treatment with zinc acetate hydrate (Novelzin® Tablets, Nobelpharma K.K.) or serum zinc levels <80 µg/dl. Zinc is a trace element essential for life. Appetite loss (30), depression (31), and taste abnormality (32) are hypozincemia-associated symptoms and risk factors for hypoalimentation. CONUT score (0-12; calculated from serum albumin and total cholesterol levels and total lymphocyte count) (29) was used to measure objective nutritional status. Comprising 10 food-based components (23), DVS was calculated as follows. First, consumption frequencies during 1 week were determined for each of 10 food items (meat, fish/shellfish, eggs, milk, soybean products, green/yellow vegetables, potatoes, fruit, seaweed and fats/oils). Second, scores were assigned as follows: 1, eaten almost daily and 0, not eaten almost daily. Third, the item scores were summed and the total DVS was in the range 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater dietary variety.

ix) Oral function [Oral Frailty Index (OFI)-8 and EAT10] (28,33). Oral frailty was defined as OFI-8 score ≥4. The EAT10 tool was used to assess dysphagia severity. The data were collected within 3 months after registration.

Definition of sarcopenia

Diagnostic algorithm recommended by AWGS 2019 Consensus was used to define (21). The handgrip strength was measured twice each with both hands using a handgrip dynamometer (Toei Light Co., Ltd.), and the larger value was noted as the maximum muscle strength. Low grip strength was defined as <28 for male and <18 kg for female patients, according to AWGS criteria. Gait speed, manually assessed using a stopwatch, was defined as slow when <1.0 m/sec according to AWGS criteria. Lean mass and regional fat were assessed from whole-body DXA scans (Prodigy Advance, GE Healthcare). Subjects were positioned for whole-body scans in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. The whole-body fat mass and lean mass were divided into arms, legs and trunk. The appendicular lean mass was estimated as the sum of the lean mass of the upper and lower limbs. The appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated as the appendicular lean mass divided by the square of the height (34). A low appendicular skeletal muscle mass was defined as appendicular SMI <7.0 in male and <5.4 kg/m2 in female patients.

Statistical analysis

Subjects were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups and risk factors for sarcopenia were compared by uni- and multivariate analyses. Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. In univariate analyses, χ2 test was used for categorical variables and unpaired Student t tests were used for continuous variables. Independent variables with P<0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the strength of any associations. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 28 software (IBM Corporation). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Clinical characteristics of patients

The clinical characteristics are summarized in Table I. Participant recruitment flow diagram is shown in Fig. 1. Mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 5.5±1.4. Sex- and age-specific prevalence of sarcopenia is shown in Table II. Sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia were diagnosed in 223 and 819 patients, respectively. The total prevalence of sarcopenia was 31.0 in male and 13.9% in female patients.

Table I

Clinical characteristics of participants (n=1,042).

Table I

Clinical characteristics of participants (n=1,042).

CharacteristicValue
Mean age, years78.2±6.1
Sex (%) 
     Male458 (44.0)
     Female584 (56.0)
Mean BMI, kg/m222.9±3.9
Mean Brinkman Index359.1±615.5
Mean alcohol0.5±0.8
Mean phase angle, ˚-4.7±0.8
Mean EQ-5D score75.0±17.0
History of falls (%) 
     Yes203 (19.5)
     No839 (80.5)
History of daycare use (%) 
     Yes91 (8.7)
     No951 (91.3)
Social frailty (%) 
     Yes679 (65.2)
     No363 (34.8)
Cerebral infarction/hemorrhage (%) 
     Yes79 (7.6)
     No963 (92.4)
Myocardial infarction (%) 
     Yes44 (4.2)
     No998 (95.8)
Hospitalization for heart failure (%) 
     Yes41 (3.9)
     No1,001 (96.1)
Interstitial pneumonia (%) 
     Yes54 (5.2)
     No988 (94.8)
Malignant disease (%) 
     Yes228 (21.9)
     No814 (78.1)
Hypertension (%) 
     Yes606 (58.2)
     No436 (41.8)
Diabetes mellitus (%) 
     Yes180 (17.3)
     No862 (82.7)
Atrial fibrillation (%) 
     Yes87 (8.3)
     No955 (91.7)
Osteoporosis (%) 
     Yes343 (32.9)
     No699 (67.1)
Mean age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index5.5±1.4
Statin use (%) 
     Yes434 (41.7)
     No608 (58.3)
Acid secretion suppressant use (%) 
     Yes573 (55.0)
     No469 (45.0)
Laxative use (%) 
     Yes228 (21.9)
     No814 (78.1)
Steroid use (%) 
     Yes50 (4.8)
     No992 (95.2)
Analgesic drug use (%) 
     Yes114 (10.9)
     No928 (89.1)
Antidementia drug use (%) 
     Yes29 (2.8)
     No1013 (97.2)
Antipsychotic drug use (%) 
     Yes261 (25.0)
     No781 (75.0)
Mean number of oral medicines6.1±3.5
Mean MMSE score26.5±3.1
Mean GDS-15 score4.2±3.0
Mean reflux-related QOL score1.8±2.4
Mean upper abdominal pain-related QOL score1.1±2.0
Mean fullness-related QOL score1.6±2.4
Mean constipation-related QOL score2.2±2.6
Mean diarrhea-related QOL score2.0±2.6
Mean CSS score3.5±3.7
Mean SpO2,%97.2±2.1
Mean CAT score8.5±6.6
Restricted ventilatory impairment (%) 
     Yes172 (16.5)
     No870 (83.5)
Obstructive ventilatory impairment (%) 
     Yes260 (25.0)
     No782 (75.0)
Hypozincemia (%) 
     Yes820 (78.7)
     No222 (21.3)
Mean CONUT score1.0±1.1
Mean DVS3.7±2.2
Oral frailty (%) 
     Yes522 (50.1)
     No520 (49.9)
Mean EAT10 score1.6±3.7

[i] EQ-5D, EuroQol-5Dimention; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; GDS-15, Geriatric Depression Scale 15; QOL, quality of life; CSS, constipation scoring system; SpO2, saturation of percutaneous oxygen; CAT, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test; CONUT, controlling nutritional status; DVS, Dietary Variety Score; EAT10, eating assessment test 10.

Table II

Prevalence of sarcopenia.

Table II

Prevalence of sarcopenia.

A, Total (n=1,042)
Age, yearsNumber of patientsNumber of casesPrevalence, %
65-69851517.6
70-742313314.3
75-792783813.7
80-842747025.5
≥851746738.5
B, Male (n=458)
Age, yearsNumber of patientsNumber of casesPrevalence, %
65-69421126.2
70-74941414.9
75-791232318.7
80-841134741.6
≥85864754.7
C, Female (n=584)
Age, yearsNumber of patientsNumber of casesPrevalence, %
65-694349.3
70-741371913.9
75-79155159.7
80-841612314.3
≥85882022.7
Association between sarcopenia and covariates in univariate analysis

Table III shows the association between sarcopenia and covariates in univariate analysis and the prevalence of sarcopenia. Between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups, there were significant differences in age, BMI, Brinkman Index, cerebral infarction/hemorrhage, history of falls and daycare use, myocardial infarction, number of oral medicines, PhA, proportion of males, QOL, history of hospitalization for heart failure, malignant disease and diabetes mellitus, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, use of antidementia drugs, number of oral medicines, MMSE, GDS-15, reflux-related QOL and CSS score, restricted ventilatory impairment, CONUT score, DVS, oral frailty and EAT10 score.

Table III

Association between sarcopenia and covariates in univariate analysis.

Table III

Association between sarcopenia and covariates in univariate analysis.

CovariateSarcopenia (n=223)Non-sarcopenia (n=819)P-value
Mean age, years80.6±6.377.6±5.8<0.001
Sex (%)   
     Male142 (63.7)316 (38.6) 
     Female81 (36.3)503 (61.4)<0.001
Mean BMI, kg/m220.8±3.123.4±3.9<0.001
Mean Brinkman Index543.0±309.0309.0±568.9<0.001
Mean alcohol0.5±0.50.5±0.80.366
Mean phase angle, ˚-4.4±0.9-4.8±0.8<0.001
Mean EQ-5D score71.6±17.576.0±16.7<0.001
History of falls (%)   
     Yes54 (24.2)149 (18.2) 
     No169 (75.8)670 (81.8)0.044
History of daycare use (%)   
     Yes36 (16.1)55 (6.7) 
     No187 (83.9)764 (93.3)<0.001
Social frailty (%)   
     Yes155 (69.5)524 (64.0) 
     No68 (30.5)295 (36.0)0.125
Cerebral infarction/hemorrhage (%)   
     Yes26 (11.7)53 (6.5) 
     No197 (88.3)766 (93.5)0.009
Myocardial infarction (%)   
     Yes16 (7.2)28 (3.4) 
     No207 (92.8)791 (96.6)0.013
Hospitalization for heart failure (%)   
     Yes14 (6.3)27 (3.3) 
     No209 (93.7)792 (96.7)0.042
Interstitial pneumonia (%)   
     Yes17 (7.6)37 (4.5) 
     No206 (92.4)782 (95.5)0.064
Malignant disease (%)   
     Yes63 (28.3)165 (20.1) 
     No160 (71.7)654 (79.9)0.009
Hypertension (%)   
     Yes140 (62.8)466 (56.9) 
     No83 (37.2)353 (43.1)0.114
Diabetes mellitus (%)   
     Yes58 (26.0)122 (14.9) 
     No165 (74.0)697 (85.1)<0.001
Atrial fibrillation (%)   
     Yes21 (9.4)66 (8.1) 
     No202 (90.6)753 (91.9)0.516
Osteoporosis (%)   
     Yes83 (37.2)260 (31.7) 
     No140 (62.8)559 (68.3)0.125
Mean age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index6.1±1.55.4±1.4<0.001
Statin use (%)   
     Yes86 (38.6)348 (42.5) 
     No137 (61.4)471 (57.5)0.292
Acid secretion suppressant use (%)   
     Yes127 (57.0)446 (54.5) 
     No96 (43.0)373 (45.5)0.507
Laxative use (%)   
     Yes55 (24.7)173 (21.1) 
     No168 (75.3)646 (78.9)0.257
Steroid use (%)   
     Yes12 (5.4)38 (4.6) 
     No211 (94.6)781 (95.4)0.646
Analgesic drug use (%)   
     Yes22 (9.9)92 (11.2) 
     No201 (90.1)727 (88.8)0.562
Antidementia drug use (%)   
     Yes11 (4.9)18 (2.2) 
     No212 (95.1)801 (97.8)0.0278
Antipsychotic drug use (%)   
     Yes57 (25.6)204 (24.9) 
     No166 (74.4)615 (75.1)0.842
Mean number of oral medicines6.8±3.66.0±3.50.002
Mean MMSE score25.3±3.526.8±2.9<0.001
Mean GDS-15 score5.0±3.24.0±3.0<0.001
Mean reflux-related QOL score1.5±2.11.8±2.40.030
Mean upper abdominal pain-related QOL score1.0±2.11.1±2.00.652
Mean fullness-related QOL score1.6±2.51.7±2.40.804
Mean constipation-related QOL score2.3±2.82.2±2.50.616
Mean diarrhea-related QOL score2.2±2.92.0±2.50.375
Mean CSS score4.0±4.13.3±3.60.013
Mean SpO2 (%)97.0±4.097.3±1.10.156
Mean CAT score9.1±6.98.4±6.50.118
Restricted ventilatory impairment (%)   
     Yes60 (26.9)112 (13.7) 
     No163 (73.1)707 (86.3)<0.001
Obstructive ventilatory impairment (%)   
     Yes66 (29.6)194 (23.7) 
     No157 (70.4)625 (76.3)0.071
Hypozincemia (%)   
     Yes186 (83.4)634 (77.4) 
     No37 (16.6)185 (22.6)0.053
Mean CONUT score1.4±1.30.9±1.1<0.001
Mean DVS3.3±2.33.8±2.2<0.001
Oral frailty (%)   
     Yes127 (57.0)395 (48.2) 
     No96 (43.0)424 (51.8)0.021
Mean EAT10 score2.2±4.21.4±3.50.004

[i] EQ-5D, EuroQol-5Dimention; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; GDS-15, Geriatric Depression Scale 15; QOL, quality of life; CSS, constipation scoring system; SpO2, saturation of percutaneous oxygen; CAT, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test; CONUT, controlling nutritional status; DVS, Dietary Variety Score; EAT10, eating assessment test 10.

Association between sarcopenia and covariates in multivariate analysis

In multivariate analysis, age, male sex, BMI, Brinkman Index, PhA, QOL, history of daycare use, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, MMSE and DVS were related to sarcopenia (Table IV).

Table IV

Association between sarcopenia and covariates in multivariate analysis.

Table IV

Association between sarcopenia and covariates in multivariate analysis.

CovariateStandardized coefficientOR95% CIP-value
Age0.0611.06321.028-1.100<0.001
Male1.9036.70283.818-11.767<0.001
BMI-0.2720.76190.715-0.812<0.001
Brinkman Index0.0001.00041.000-1.0010.021
Phase angle0.6191.85761.385-2.491<0.001
EQ-5D-0.0150.98530.975-0.9960.007
History of falls0.2421.27350.789-2.0570.323
History of day care use0.6461.90711.038-3.5040.038
Social frailty0.2301.25830.822-1.9270.291
Cerebral infarction/hemorrhage0.2091.23220.600-2.5300.569
Myocardial infarction0.5151.67330.725-3.8600.227
History of hospitalization for heart failure0.3821.46490.523-4.1020.467
Interstitial pneumonia0.5041.65550.764-3.5870.201
Malignant disease0.1881.20670.773-1.8840.409
Hypertension0.1741.19020.786-1.8020.411
Diabetes mellitus0.7802.18231.381-3.4490.001
Osteoporosis0.5951.81301.078-3.0480.025
Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index-0.0190.98140.707-1.3620.910
Antidementia drug use-0.5730.56380.141-2.2560.418
Number of oral medicines0.0131.01300.953-1.0770.678
MMSE score-0.0850.91840.862-0.9780.008
GDS-15 score0.0451.04590.981-1.1150.171
Reflux-related QOL score-0.0530.94800.867-1.0360.240
CSS score-0.0030.99740.946-1.0510.922
SpO20.0211.02140.955-1.0930.538
CAT score0.0041.00430.968-1.0420.816
Restricted ventilatory impairment0.2381.26920.787-2.0480.329
Obstructive ventilatory impairment0.1431.15400.747-1.7830.519
Hypozincemia-0.3640.69500.432-1.1190.134
CONUT score-0.0150.98510.835-1.1620.859
DVS-0.0920.91200.834-0.9970.043
Oral frailty0.0431.04360.690-1.5780.840
EAT10 score-0.0050.99490.943-1.0490.850

[i] EQ-5D, EuroQol-5Dimention; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; GDS-15, Geriatric Depression Scale 15; QOL, quality of life; CSS, constipation scoring system; SpO2, saturation of percutaneous oxygen; CAT, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test; CONUT, controlling nutritional status; DVS, Dietary Variety Score; EAT10, eating assessment test 10.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first large cross-sectional, multidisciplinary study examining the prevalence of sarcopenia according to AWGS 2019 consensus criteria and the association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia in older outpatients of a university-affiliated geriatric hospital in Japan. Sarcopenia prevalence was higher than previously reported in community-dwelling individuals (2) and dietary variety status was associated with sarcopenia.

According to a systematic review and meta-analysis, muscle mass is most commonly assessed by BIA, followed by DXA and computed tomography scan (35). The most frequently employed sarcopenia classification criteria established by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) (36) and AWGS, were used in 95 and 55 studies, respectively (31). According to the aforementioned meta-analysis, the sarcopenia prevalence in individuals aged >60 years depended on the set of classification criteria used as follows: EWGSOP2, 10; EWGSOP, 23; AWGS, 14; International Working Group on Sarcopenia, 14; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, 12 and muscle mass definition, 27%, respectively. Here, sarcopenia prevalence was higher (21.4%) than the mean of the reported prevalence of AWGS-defined sarcopenia (2). This discrepancy may be attributed to the higher number of patients with multiple severe disease at a university-affiliated geriatric hospital. Additionally, the mean age of participants was higher in here (78.2±6.1 years) than in other studies (71-74 years) (37-40). In a prospective study of the relationship between sarcopenia and falls in persons aged ≥80 years (mean age, 86.7 years) in Italy, sarcopenia was identified in 25.4% of participants (41). Hence, interpretation of sarcopenia prevalence should consider diagnostic criteria used and the characteristics of the population under study (37-41).

The present study showed a higher prevalence of sarcopenia among male compared with female patients. However, a meta-analysis of studies using the AWGS definition did not find a difference in the sarcopenia prevalence based on sex (2). Participants in the present study were all outpatients at a university-affiliated geriatric hospital. This resulted in a higher mean age compared with previously reported community-dwelling older populations (2). Since a previous Japanese cohort study showed that sarcopenia prevalence increases with age in males (37), the higher mean age may underlie the present high sarcopenia prevalence among males.

In the present study, sarcopenia was significantly associated with Brinkman Index, history of daycare use, PhA, QOL and DM. Previous reports indicate a higher prevalence of smokers in male patients with sarcopenia (38) although the association is not confirmed (40). Because PhA reflects cell membrane fragility, muscle mass and strength and nutritional status, its use as a proxy for predicting falls and identifying individuals at risk of disability has been suggested (42). Matsumoto et al (43) demonstrated that a history of falls may serve as a simple screening tool to help prevent osteoporosis and sarcopenia. A 2-year prospective observational study indicated that sarcopenia prevalence is a significant predictor of falling (44). In older adults, injuries and fractures from falls lead to reduced physical activity and strength and confinement to bed (38,39). PhA from BIA is a valuable and simple prognostic tool for identifying older individuals at risk of disability who may benefit from preventive treatment (45). The present study also evaluated quality of life using the EQ-VAS questionnaire, which is commonly used in primary care to assess health. Previous studies have demonstrated the value of EQ-VAS in assessing frailty and decline in EQ-VAS in predicting frailty (46,47). DM and heart failure are risk factors for skeletal muscle mass decrease (48,49). Studying sarcopenia and its association with DM and heart failure may provide insight into sarcopenia prevention, diagnosis and management.

The present study also showed that osteoporosis and sarcopenia are significantly associated. Hida et al (50) suggested that sarcopenia increases the risk for osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Simultaneous muscle loss and abnormal bone metabolism caused by sarcopenia-associated systemic disorder, including malnutrition and diabetes, could contribute to this association (50). Neuropsychological examination in the present study revealed that sarcopenia was associated with low MMSE and high GDS-15 score. Several studies have suggested that cognitive impairment is associated with sarcopenia (38,51,52). Nishikawa et al (53) reported an independent association between decreased grip strength and increased risk for depression progression in patients with chronic liver disease.

A systematic review conducted by Jang et al (54) concluded that dietary variety can decrease risk of sarcopenia. The present study found a significant association CSS and sarcopenia in univariate analysis. A previous study in Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan) demonstrated that sarcopenia is an independent predictor for CSS score (55). Decreased abdominal pressure due to low muscle mass for sarcopenia may contribute to functional defecation disorder (49). DVS was associated with sarcopenia. Momoki et al reported that DVS is associated with sarcopenia in elderly female community residents in Japan (56).

The present study had limitations. First, participants were outpatients aged ≥65 years at a single university hospital. Background variables such as exercise routines, dietary pattern, occupation, education level and marital status was not investigated. Therefore, it is possible that the present findings cannot be generalized. Due to the higher number of patients with high degrees of multimorbidity, sarcopenia prevalence may be overestimated because of unhealthy subject bias. Furthermore, as the present study was a cross-sectional study, it is not possible to infer a causal relationship with sarcopenia. A longitudinal study should be conducted to investigate the effects of sarcopenia prevention.

In conclusion, the present large cross-sectional study demonstrated that sarcopenia was more prevalent in outpatients than previously reported in community-dwelling older individuals and dietary variety status was associated with sarcopenia.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Hisafumi Yamagata and Dr. Maiko Suzuki (Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan), Dr. Ryota Kanemaru and Dr. Tomoko Yamada (Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan), Dr. Yurina Sugita (Department of Cardiology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Shinsuna, Koto, Tokyo, Japan) and Dr. Ran Matsudaira (Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan) for patient referral. The authors would also like to thank Ms. Mutsuko Hatanaka and Ms. Ryoko Yamaguchi (Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan) for data input.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research; grant nos. 21K11633 and 16K09042).

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

DA and KMi confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. DA, KS, AN and KMi designed the study. DA and KMa interpreted data. DA wrote the manuscript. NY and YN performed statistical analysis. NSi, HS, NE, YI, MT, NSa, MI, MN, TM, SI and YM administered questionnaires. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center Ethics Committee approved the study (approval no. G20-0011). Informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Lee JS, Visser M, Nevitt M, Kritchevsky SB, Tylavsky FA and Newman AB: Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Alternative definitions of sarcopenia, lower extremity performance, and functional impairment with aging in older men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 55:769–774. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Petermann-Rocha F, Balntzi V, Gray SR, Lara J, Ho FK, Pell JP and Celis-Morales C: Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 13:86–99. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, Chou MY, Chen LY, Hsu PS, Krairit O, et al: Sarcopenia in Asia: Consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 15:95–101. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Iidaka T, Kodama R, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Tanaka S and Akune T: Is osteoporosis a predictor for future sarcopenia or vice versa? Four-year observations between the second and third ROAD study surveys. Osteoporos Int. 28:189–199. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Yoshida D, Suzuki T, Shimada H, Park H, Makizako H, Doi T, Anan Y, Tsutsumimoto K, Uemura K, Ito T and Lee S: Using two different algorithms to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 14 (Suppl 1):S46–S51. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Kiuchi Y, Tsutsumimoto K, Doi T, Kurita S, Nishimoto K, Makizako H and Shimada H: Effect of dietary diversity on incident of disability in community-dwelling older adults with sarcopenia: A 40-month follow-up longitudinal study. Maturitas. 179(107887)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Matsuno K, Asaoka D, Sugano K, Takahashi K and Miyauchi K: Rationale and design of Juntendo Sarcopenia Registration to explore the predictors and prognosis of sarcopenia and frailty in the elderly in TOKYO (JUSTICE-TOKYO). Geriatr Gerontol Int. 24:168–172. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC and Vandenbroucke JP: STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 12:1495–1499. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Folstein MF, Folstein SE and McHugh PR: ‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 12:189–198. 1975.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Sugishita K, Sugishita M, Hemmi I, Asada T and Tanigawa T: A validity and reliability study of the Japanese version of the geriatric depression scale 15 (GDS-15-J). Clin Gerontol. 40:233–240. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Furuta K, Ishihara S, Sato S, Miyake T, Ishimura N, Koshino K, Tobita H, Moriyama I, Amano Y, Adachi K, et al: Development and verification of the Izumo Scale, new questionnaire for quality of life assessment of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 106:1478–1487. 2009.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese).

12 

Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P and Wexner SD: A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:681–685. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen WH and Kline Leidy N: Development and first validation of the COPD assessment test. Eur Respir J. 34:648–654. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N and Conde JG: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 42:377–381. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Brinkman GL and Coates EO Jr: The effect of bronchitis, smoking, and occupation on ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis. 87:684–693. 1963.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Makizako H, Shimada H, Tsutsumimoto K, Lee S, Doi T, Nakakubo S, Hotta R and Suzuki T: Social frailty in community-dwelling older adults as a risk factor for disability. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 16:1003.e7–e11. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Baumgartner RN, Chumlea WC and Roche AF: Bioelectric impedance phase angle and body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 48:16–23. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

EuroQol Group: EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 16:199–208. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Bellido D, García-García C, Talluri A, Lukaski HC and García-Almeida JM: Future lines of research on phase angle: Strengths and limitations. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 24:563–583. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Norman K, Stobäus N, Pirlich M and Bosy-Westphal A: Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis-clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. Clin Nutr. 31:854–861. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S, et al: Asian working group for sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 21:300–307.e2. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Mushnick R, Fein PA, Mittman N, Goel N, Chattopadhyay J and Avram MM: Relationship of bioelectrical impedance parameters to nutrition and survival in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int. Suppl:S53–S56. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Kumagai S, Watanabe S, Shibata H, Amano H, Fujiwara Y, Shinkai S, Yoshida H, Suzuki T, Yukawa H, Yasumura S and Haga H: Effects of dietary variety on declines in high-level functional capacity in elderly people living in a community. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 50:1117–1124. 2003.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese).

24 

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL and MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 40:373–383. 1987.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J and Gold J: Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 47:1245–1251. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Soen S, Fukunaga M, Sugimoto T, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Endo N, Gorai I, Shiraki M, Hagino H, Hosoi T, et al: Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: Year 2012 revision. J Bone Miner Metab. 31:247–257. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

No authors listed. Guideline of respiratory function tests-spirometry, flow-volume curve, diffusion capacity of the lung. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. Suppl:S1–S56. 2004.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese).

28 

Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J and Leonard RJ: Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 117:919–924. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Ignacio de Ulíbarri J, González-Madroño A, de Villar NG, González P, González B, Mancha A, Rodríguez F and Fernández G: CONUT: A tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population. Nutr Hosp. 20:38–45. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Levenson CW: Zinc regulation of food intake: New insights on the role of neuropeptide Y. Nutr Rev. 61:247–249. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Nowak G, Szewczyk B and Pilc A: Zinc and depression. An update. Pharmacol Rep. 57:713–718. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Kinomoto T, Sawada M, Ohnishi Y, Yamaguchi T, Tsuge S, Ogawa S, Washizuka M, Minaguchi J, Mera Y and Takehana K: Effects of polaprezinc on morphological change of the tongue in zinc-deficient rats. J Oral Pathol Med. 39:617–623. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Tanaka T, Hirano H, Ohara Y, Nishimoto M and Iijima K: Oral Frailty Index-8 in the risk assessment of new-onset oral frailty and functional disability among community-dwelling older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 94(104340)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield SB, Ross RR, Garry PJ and Lindeman RD: Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 147:755–763. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Shafiee G, Keshtkar A, Soltani A, Ahadi Z, Larijani B and Heshmat R: Prevalence of sarcopenia in the world: A systematic review and meta-analysis of general population studies. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 16(21)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, et al: Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing. 39:412–423. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Kurose S, Nishikawa S, Nagaoka T, Kusaka M, Kawamura J, Nishioka Y, Sato S, Tsutsumi H and Kimura Y: Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults visiting regional medical institutions from the Kadoma sarcopenia study. Sci Rep. 10(19129)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Kitamura A, Seino S, Abe T, Nofuji Y, Yokoyama Y, Amano H, Nishi M, Taniguchi Y, Narita M, Fujiwara Y and Shinkai S: Sarcopenia: Prevalence, associated factors, and the risk of mortality and disability in Japanese older adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 12:30–38. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Uemura K, Makizako H, Lee S, Doi T, Lee S, Tsutsumimoto K and Shimada H: The impact of sarcopenia on incident homebound status among community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study. Maturitas. 113:26–31. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Nakamura K, Yoshida D, Honda T, Hata J, Shibata M, Hirakawa Y, Furuta Y, Kishimoto H, Ohara T, Kitazono T, et al: Prevalence and mortality of sarcopenia in a community-dwelling older japanese population: The Hisayama study. J Epidemiol. 31:320–327. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Landi F, Liperoti R, Russo A, Giovannini S, Tosato M, Capoluongo E, Bernabei R and Onder G: Sarcopenia as a risk factor for falls in elderly individuals: results from the ilSIRENTE study. Clin Nutr. 31:652–568. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Matsumoto Y, Tada M, Yamada Y, Mandai K, Hidaka N and Koike T: The bioimpedance phase angle is more useful than sarcopenia as a predictor of falls in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a 2-y prospective cohort study. Nutrition. 102(111729)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Matsumoto H, Tanimura C, Kushida D, Osaka H, Kawabata Y and Hagino H: FRAX score and recent fall history predict the incidence for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 31:1985–1994. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Matsumoto H, Tanimura C, Tanishima S, Osaki M, Noma H and Hagino H: Sarcopenia is a risk factor for falling in independently living Japanese older adults: A 2-year prospective cohort study of the GAINA study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 17:2124–2130. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Uemura K, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Nakakubo S, Kim MJ, Kurita S, Ishi H and Shimada H: Predictivity of bioimpedance phase angle for incident disability in older adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 11:46–45. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Kim S, Won CW, Kim BS, Kim S, Yoo J, Byun S, Jang HC, Cho BL, Son SJ, Lee JH, et al: EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) as a predicting tool for frailty in Older Korean adults: The Korean frailty an aging cohort study (KFACS). J Nutr Health Aging. 22:1275–1280. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Beaudart C, Demonceau C, Reginster JY, Locquet M, Cesari M, Cruz Jentoft AJ and Bruyère O: Sarcopenia and health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 14:1228–1243. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Park SW, Goodpaster BH, Lee JS, Kuller LH, Boudreau R, de Rekeneire N, Harris TB, Kritchevsky S, Tylavsky FA, Nevitt M, et al: Excessive loss of skeletal muscle mass in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 32:1993–1997. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Fülster S, Tacke M, Sandek A, Ebner N, Tschöpe C, Doehner W, Anker SD and von Haehling S: Muscle wasting in patients with chronic heart failure: Results from the studies investigating co-morbidities aggravating heart failure (SICA-HF). Eur Heart J. 34:512–519. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Hida T, Shimokata H, Sakai Y, Ito S, Matsui Y, Takemura M, Kasai T, Ishiguro N and Harada A: Sarcopenia and sarcopenic leg as potential risk factors for acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture among older women. Eur Spine J. 25:3424–3431. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Maeda K and Akagi J: Cognitive impairment is independently associated with definitive and possible sarcopenia in hospitalized older adults: The prevalence and impact of comorbidities. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 17:1048–1056. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Nishiguchi S, Yamada M, Shirooka H, Nozaki Y, Fukutani N, Tashiro Y, Hirata H, Yamaguchi M, Tasaka S, Matsushita T, et al: Sarcopenia as a risk factor for cognitive deterioration in community-dwelling older adults: A 1-year prospective study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 17:372.e5–e8. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Nishikawa H, Yoh K, Enomoto H, Ikeda N, Takashima T, Aizawa N, Nishimura T, Nishiguchi S and Iijima H: Reduced grip strength is associated with progression of depressive status in chronic liver diseases. Ann Palliat Med. 10:3976–3987. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Jang EH, Han YJ, Jang SE and Lee S: Association between diet quality and sarcopenia in older adults: Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Life (Basel). 11(811)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Asaoka D, Takeda T, Inami Y, Abe D, Shimada Y, Matsumoto K, Ueyama H, Matsumoto K, Komori H, Akazawa Y, et al: Association between the severity of constipation and sarcopenia in elderly adults: A single-center university hospital-based, cross-sectional study. Biomed Rep. 14(2)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Momoki C, Habu D, Ogura J, Tada A, Hasei A, Sakurai K and Watanabe H: Relationships between sarcopenia and household status and locomotive syndrome in a community-dwelling elderly women in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 17:54–60. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2024
Volume 21 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Asaoka D, Sugano K, Matsuno K, Shibata N, Sugiyama H, Endo N, Iwase Y, Tajima M, Sakuma N, Inoue M, Inoue M, et al: Association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia as defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus in older outpatients at a hospital specializing in geriatric medicine: A cross‑sectional study with baseline data of prospective cohort study (JUSTICE‑TOKYO study). Biomed Rep 21: 123, 2024
APA
Asaoka, D., Sugano, K., Matsuno, K., Shibata, N., Sugiyama, H., Endo, N. ... Miyauchi, K. (2024). Association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia as defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus in older outpatients at a hospital specializing in geriatric medicine: A cross‑sectional study with baseline data of prospective cohort study (JUSTICE‑TOKYO study). Biomedical Reports, 21, 123. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1811
MLA
Asaoka, D., Sugano, K., Matsuno, K., Shibata, N., Sugiyama, H., Endo, N., Iwase, Y., Tajima, M., Sakuma, N., Inoue, M., Nagata, M., Mizutani, T., Ishii, M., Iida, S., Miura, Y., Nishizaki, Y., Yanagisawa, N., Nagahara, A., Miyauchi, K."Association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia as defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus in older outpatients at a hospital specializing in geriatric medicine: A cross‑sectional study with baseline data of prospective cohort study (JUSTICE‑TOKYO study)". Biomedical Reports 21.2 (2024): 123.
Chicago
Asaoka, D., Sugano, K., Matsuno, K., Shibata, N., Sugiyama, H., Endo, N., Iwase, Y., Tajima, M., Sakuma, N., Inoue, M., Nagata, M., Mizutani, T., Ishii, M., Iida, S., Miura, Y., Nishizaki, Y., Yanagisawa, N., Nagahara, A., Miyauchi, K."Association between dietary variety status and sarcopenia as defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 consensus in older outpatients at a hospital specializing in geriatric medicine: A cross‑sectional study with baseline data of prospective cohort study (JUSTICE‑TOKYO study)". Biomedical Reports 21, no. 2 (2024): 123. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1811