Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on endocrine system (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 5, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2024.1816
- Article Number: 128
-
Copyright: © Ruiz-Santiago et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
1. Introduction
Major depressive disorder (MDD) constitutes a major public health issue, since it affects a significant proportion of the population (1). The World Health Organization reported in 2019 that 280 million individuals worldwide were living with depression, including 23 million children and adolescents (2). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed antidepressants administered to treat this disorder (3). SSRI-induced inhibition of serotonin, also termed 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), reuptake increases 5-HT levels in the synaptic cleft, thereby prolonging the activation of the postsynaptic 5-HT receptors, resulting in a disturbance in the neuroendocrine response (4). Furthermore, SSRIs can indirectly increase intracellular glucocorticoid concentrations via inhibition of P-glycoprotein, thus enhancing glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function (5). Depression is one of the most frequently diagnosed psychiatric disorders during pregnancy (6). SSRIs such as fluoxetine, are administered as antidepressants during pregnancy; however, fluoxetine can cross the transplacental barrier and affect 5-HT levels in the fetus (6). Therefore, a number of studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of fluoxetine on offspring exposed during pregnancy and lactation (6,7). As with fluoxetine, other SSRIs such as citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline and fluvoxamine, have also been studied with regard to their adverse effects on the endocrine system (8). In the present review, the current evidence detailing the impact of SSRIs, including fluoxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline and fluvoxamine, on the endocrine system is reported. The current literature suggests that SSRI can negatively affect glucose metabolism, sexual function and fertility by disrupting the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, pancreas and gonads. Since SSRIs are often prescribed for extended periods, it is crucial to monitor the patient closely with particular attention to the function of the endocrine system.
2. Methods
For the present narrative review, literature related to the effects of SSRIs on the endocrine system was searched using the PubMed database (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The search terms included the following: ‘SSRI’, ‘SSRIs’, ‘selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors’, ‘fluoxetine’, ‘citalopram’, ‘escitalopram’, ‘paroxetine’, ‘sertraline’, ‘fluvoxamine’, ‘adverse effects’, ‘side effects’, ‘endocrine’, ‘thyroid hormones’ and ‘endocrine system’. Combinations of search terms were also used, which included: ‘SSRI(s) and endocrine’ or ‘endocrine system’, ‘antidepressant (such as fluoxetine) and endocrine’ or ‘endocrine system’, ‘thyroid hormones’ and ‘adverse effects’ or ‘side effects’. Clinical studies, in vitro and preclinical studies using rodents were selected.
3. Fluoxetine
Fluoxetine, an SSRI approved for therapeutic use by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1987, is a selective inhibitor of 5-HT uptake. A study demonstrated that acute administration of fluoxetine increases extracellular 5-HT levels in the frontal cortex, ventral hippocampus and raphe nucleus (9). In addition, chronic administration of fluoxetine has been found to increase dopamine and norepinephrine (NE) levels in the prefrontal cortex, diencephalon, hippocampus and striatum (10). Fluoxetine is indicated for patients with MDD, anxiety, bulimia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic attacks or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (11). Fluoxetine is a highly lipophilic compound that is absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration and is mainly eliminated through urine and to a lesser extent through feces (10). The plasma half-life of fluoxetine is reported to be 48-96 h, but its active metabolite, norfluoxetine, lasts for 7-14 days (12). The typical fluoxetine dose varies from 20 to 80 mg daily (13,14), resulting in plasma concentrations of 1.73±1.00 µM.
Fluoxetine and the HPA axis
The activity of the HPA axis is associated with MDD and the response to antidepressants, as a result of the intricate interplay within the serotonergic system, which regulates feeding, water intake, sexual drive, reproduction and circadian rhythms (15,16). An initial study examining the impact of stress and fluoxetine treatment on female rats during pregnancy revealed a decline in corticosterone levels and GR expression, as well as its hippocampus coactivator, in male offspring during adolescence, which may result in an altered stress response (17). However, Knaepen et al (18) observed a reduction in the serum levels of corticosterone-binding globulin (CBG) in Sprague Dawley rats' offspring exposed to stress during pregnancy and lactation, with no impact on corticosterone concentration in response to pain. This was observed in rats receiving fluoxetine treatment during the same period.
A previous study reported that exposing prepubertal mice to prenatal fluoxetine significantly increased their corticosterone response to acute stress (6). Furthermore, exposing adult mice administered prenatal fluoxetine to continuous stress reduced their general activity, as well as behaviors related to anxiety and depression. In addition, it was observed that adult mice exposed to prenatal fluoxetine were insensitive to glucocorticoids, indicating an interruption in regulating the negative feedback of the HPA axis to stress (7). Gemmel et al (19) found that serum CBG levels and 5-HT levels in the hippocampus increased in prepubertal male and female Sprague Dawley rats exposed to perinatal fluoxetine. A decrease in presynaptic densities and immature neurons in the dentate gyrus was also observed, but only in males. Furthermore, fluoxetine was found to lower GR expression in the hippocampal CA2 and CA3 regions and to reduce the density of glutamate receptor interacting protein 1 in the hippocampal CA1 region of prepubertal and adolescent individuals (17,19).
A study that solely focused on mice female offspring with prenatal exposure to fluoxetine (1 mg/kg/day) reported a fluoxetine-increased corticosterone response to continuous stress. By contrast, in adult mice, fluoxetine increased the corticosterone response to acute stress and suppressed the response to continuous stress. In addition, the study concluded that prenatal fluoxetine exposure led to disrupted negative control feedback of the HPA response to stress in the offspring upon reaching adulthood (20). A number of studies have reported behavioral and relationship changes, including aggressive interactions, sibling play time, crawling time, mating time, open field activity time, immobility time in forced swimming tests and performance time in T mazes, which may be linked to prenatal fluoxetine effects on the HPA axis (7,19,20).
Common side effects reported in patients
Fluoxetine is widely prescribed to treat psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety (20-80 mg/day) (21,22). Fluoxetine was the first SSRI discovered and acts by inhibiting 5-HT reuptake at serotonergic presynaptic nerve endings, thereby exerting its antidepressant effect (21,23). Due to its higher specificity compared with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, fluoxetine causes fewer side effects. However, patients undergoing fluoxetine treatment are still prone to treatment-related conditions (23). Fluoxetine has a hepatic metabolism (21,24), with a half-life of 24-96 h, which is 196-360 h for norfluoxetine. The impact of this treatment on body weight and cholesterol, lipoprotein and triglyceride levels has been examined in individuals undergoing treatment for depression. This is because it has been shown to induce lipid metabolism abnormalities (21,22,24).
There is a higher incidence of depression in insulin-dependent individuals (0.5 IU/kg per day), and it has been established that fluoxetine (20 mg/day) causes alterations in glucose homeostasis in these patients (25). Long-term use of SSRIs has also been associated with an increased risk of diabetes, (26,27). In addition, there have been numerous reports of hypoglycemic episodes and loss of consciousness incidents related to the use of fluoxetine (25,28,29). For instance, a previous study reported the case of a patient with congenital chronic hyperinsulinism in which the use of fluoxetine led to hypoglycemic episodes (26).
Another notable negative side effect that causes concern among fluoxetine users is sexual dysfunction (SD) (at doses from <10 to 60 mg/day). Although SD is not uncommon in psychiatric patients, the use of SSRIs appears to increase its prevalence (30,31). Symptoms of SD are gender-associated, even when SD affects both men and women (23,31). In men, SD manifests as decreased libido, difficulty maintaining an erection, anorgasmia and retarded ejaculation (23,32,33). In women, reduced sexual desire and sexual arousal, alterations in lubrication and orgasm retardation were reported (31,34). In addition to inhibiting 5-HT reuptake, SSRIs also interact with other neurotransmitters, including NE and dopamine. Furthermore, sexual activity is associated with multiple neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, 5-HT and adrenaline. Studies have shown that drugs that elevate 5-HT levels frequently have an adverse effect on sexual function (34-36). Furthermore, SSRIs have been shown to impact male fertility by affecting sperm quality, quantity and motility (35,36). Finally, it has been recommended that the use of fluoxetine should be avoided during the third trimester of pregnancy due to an increased risk of hemorrhage and fetal nervousness (11).
Effect on gonads
It is known that fluoxetine induces alterations in the reproductive systems of both male and female rat offspring (37-44). In male rats, a diminished weight of the testicles and seminal glands, reduction of Leydig cells and a shorter length of seminal tubes were observed (39,44). In female rats, it caused irregular reproductive cycles, an increase of secondary and total follicles, and also apoptotic ovarian cells when exposed during gestation (37). Testosterone production in male rats is associated with luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which are regulated by gonadotropin (38). 5-HT is known to modulate the secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on the HPA axis, resulting in a direct effect of 5-HT on testosterone levels (39). Although SSRIs increase 5-HT levels in the brain, these drugs also interfere with the HPA axis. Fluoxetine is a commonly prescribed SSRI, but research has implicated adverse effects of fluoxetine that vary according to dose and age at the time of administration (40). For instance, studies have shown that a fluoxetine concentration of 10 mg/kg administered to adult male rats reduces FSH and testosterone levels, sperm count and mobility, and seminiferous tubule size. Steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) gene expression is also decreased (40-42). In a previous study, administration of 20 mg/kg fluoxetine to Holtzman male rats over a short period (11 days) significantly decreased the weight of the testicles as well as the diameter and volume of the seminiferous tubules. In addition, the number and size of Sertoli and Leydig cells were reduced, accompanied by a concurrent reduction in steroidogenic activity, which resulted in lower serum testosterone levels (43).
The administration of fluoxetine (5 mg/kg day) to prepubertal rats has been reported to result in alterations in the levels of gonadotropins and sexual steroids (such as LH, FSH, progesterone and testosterone) upon reaching adulthood (38). Sperm quality can also be affected in juvenile rats, as reported by Ayala et al (38). Further evidence indicates negative consequences for male descendants of fluoxetine-exposed (5-20 mg/kg) rats during the gestation and lactation periods. The observed effects of fluoxetine exposure include reductions in seminiferous tubules and epithelium, nuclear diameter in Sertoli and Leydig cells, as well as body and testicular weight and sperm production (39,44). Furthermore, female offspring from rats exposed to fluoxetine (5-10 mg/kg/day) during the fetal and neonatal periods (45) displayed irregular reproductive cycles, increased total ovarian follicles and an increased number of ovarian apoptotic cells (37). These findings suggest that prenatal exposure to fluoxetine has long-term side effects on the reproductive function of female descendants. A study in rats (CII-ZV conventional strain) evaluated the effects of short-term treatment during puberty. The results indicated that a concentration of 5 mg/kg fluoxetine resulted in decreased ova shedding, the production of atretic follicles and structural abnormalities in oocytes (46).
Pancreas
As aforementioned, there have been reports regarding the negative effects of SSRIs on patients with depression and diabetes, or depression and congenital hyperinsulinism. It has also been reported that long-term SSRI use is related to an increased risk of metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes (3,27,47). Pancreatic β-cells synthesize and store 5-HT, which is released along with insulin (48). It has been reported that SSRIs at concentrations ranging from 30 to 100 µM can directly impact the function of these cells, inhibiting glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) by pancreatic islets and inducing apoptosis (3). In an in vitro study using INS-1E cells, a rat insulinoma β-cell line, it was found that chronic exposure to 1 µM fluoxetine reduced GSIS and increased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the level of oxidative damage. The authors related this phenomenon to a reduced enzymatic activity of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, but no negative effects were found on cell viability (47). It has also been suggested in previous reports that the susceptibility of pancreatic β-cells to oxidative stress could be due to a lower production of the enzymes related to metabolism and the neutralization of ROS (49,50).
Mitochondria have important roles in cell types with a high energy demand, such as neurons and sensory, skeletal and cardiac muscle cells. Elmorsy et al (51) explored the possibility of fluoxetine diabetogenic effects on the mitochondria of pancreatic β-cells via glucose metabolism signaling and its effect on insulin secretion. Similar to previous reports, cytotoxicity caused by fluoxetine was observed at a concentration of 30 µM, and the level of cytotoxicity increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner. It was determined that this cytotoxicity was due to the blocking of the mitochondrial complex, ATP production inhibition and an increase in ROS. As such, it was concluded that the effect of fluoxetine on GSIS could be related to oxidative stress and lower ATP production. In another attempt to understand the relationship between fluoxetine administration and GSIS inhibition, Cataldo et al (48) performed a study using pancreatic β-cells and found that these cells can synthesize and secrete 5-HT in response to glucose (48). A decrease in GSIS was also observed when the cells were treated with 10 µM fluoxetine or 5-HT. However, there was no increase in extracellular 5-HT following fluoxetine treatment, which was consistent with the lack of expression of three different serotonin transporters (SERTs) in these cells, ruling out that the reduced insulin secretion was due to fluoxetine blocking these SERTs (48).
E-cadherin is also essential to pancreatic β-cell function, particularly in GSIS, since it enhances cellular adhesion and stabilizes the structure of the pancreas. In addition, an increase in free calcium in the cytosol is indispensable for insulin secretion by the pancreatic islets (52). In a study to assess whether fluoxetine affects E-cadherin or Ca2+-mediated cell adhesion, it was demonstrated that 30 µM fluoxetine affects GSIS, consistent with other studies, and that this effect is associated with E-cadherin homeostasis and a reduction in Ca2+ storage in the endoplasmic reticulum (53).
In contrast to the results of the aforementioned studies, there have also been reports that SSRIs, mostly fluoxetine, citalopram and escitalopram, exhibit beneficial effects on glycemic index control in moderately obese adults (54) and in patients with type II diabetes mellitus (55). In addition, a recent study by Liu et al (56) reported that fluoxetine at therapeutic concentrations (<3 µM, as aforementioned) not only did not compromise cell viability, but also enhanced GSIS in human and mouse pancreatic islets in vitro. Furthermore, an increase in pancreatic β-cell proliferation and cytokine-induced apoptosis protection was reported. Although these results contradicted those of previous studies regarding fluoxetine-mediated GSIS alteration, they concurred on the notable role of this drug in this particular metabolic process.
4. Citalopram
Citalopram is frequently prescribed as an initial therapy for depression. Although it is a blend of R and S stereoisomers, the therapeutic impact of citalopram is mostly linked to the S-enantiomer, since it has a stronger association with the SERT compared with the R-enantiomer (57,58). Citalopram undergoes a series of chemical transformations, beginning with an initial demethylation to form desmethylcitalopram. This is then followed by a second demethylation to form didesmethylcitalopram. Finally, the didesmethylcitalopram is deamidated by MAO-A and MAO-B to form a propionic acid derivative (59).
An age-dependent stimulatory effect of citalopram on CRH secretion has been observed in healthy men, as both adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels increased significantly with acute infusion of citalopram (4). A stimulatory effect on ACTH and cortisol secretion was demonstrated following acute administration of various serotonergic agonists (such as 5-HT1B+1A agonist RU 24969, and 8-OH-DPAT) in rats (60). Citalopram has also been shown to have an inhibitory effect on CYP in the steroidogenic pathway. However, it should be noted that escitalopram is a more potent CYP17 stimulator. Consequently, the stimulatory effect of escitalopram is observed on the hydroxylase reaction, whereas the main effect of citalopram is on the lyase enzyme, which is expressed as five steroidogenic apoenzymes in the adrenal gland, including CYP17A1, CYP21A2, CYP11A1 and CYP11B1/CYP11B2. When CYP11A1 (also known as StAR) is affected, it can result in adrenal insufficiency with low adrenal and gonadal steroid production (58). In a recent study, Durell et al (61) reported an adverse effect on weight loss associated with the combined intake of citalopram or escitalopram and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). It was demonstrated that escitalopram/citalopram may reduce the weight loss effect of GLP-1 RA therapy. Two mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain this phenomenon: i) Escitalopram/citalopram may increase the antidiabetic treatment burden secondary to weight gain, thus reducing the effect of GLP-1 RAs; and ii) a possible interaction between the molecules may result in a diminished capacity to lose weight with GLP-1 RAs. However, the authors recommended additional studies be performed to further investigate the mechanism by which these antidepressants reduce weight loss due to AR GLP-1 therapy and to describe in more detail the proposed mechanisms.
Effect on gonads
It has been observed that repeated pharmacological doses of citalopram reduced the sperm concentration, increased DNA damage and induced morphological damage to testicular tissue. This was due to citalopram inducing changes in LH and testosterone levels, which have an important role in spermatogenesis, and decreasing glutathione (GSH) precursor levels, which is a sign of testicular oxidative stress (62). According to Ilgin et al (62), abnormal sperm morphology increased in both the head and tail with the administration of 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg of citalopram in male rats. It should also be noted that spermatogenesis is regulated by endocrine activity, which occurs through the hypothalamus-pituitary-testes axis (62). Therefore, increased LH levels appear to be associated with the toxic effects of citalopram on sperm concentration and morphology (62). Reproductive and sexual functions, such as sexual behavior and arousal, are primarily regulated by the pulsatile secretion of GnRH from the hypothalamus (63). This hormone acts on pituitary gonadotropins, which control the production and release of FSH and LH, and these gonadotropins control the development and maturation of the gonads, stimulating steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis in the testes and folliculogenesis in the ovaries (64). Therefore, SSRIs may interfere with the neuronal activity of GnRH (63).
5. Escitalopram
Escitalopram is classified as an allosteric 5-HT reuptake inhibitor and is one of the most widely used antidepressant drugs. Escitalopram has a high affinity for the SERT and hence amplifies serotonergic activity in the central nervous system (CNS). In terms of inhibiting 5-HT reuptake, escitalopram (the S-enantiomer) is at least 100 times more effective than the R-enantiomer. In addition, via inducing a structural alteration of the SERT, escitalopram binds to the allosteric site at a lower affinity, which appears to maintain and extend escitalopram binding to the primary site (65,66). Escitalopram can also alter and restore the reactivity of the HPA axis in rats (67).
HPA axis
In a study on chronically stressed rats, researchers observed a decrease in the expression of CRH and its receptors in the hypothalamus, accompanied by an increase in the GRs. In addition, a decrease in circulating corticosterone levels was detected, suggesting a possible association with HPA axis dysfunction (57). Chronically elevated glucocorticoid levels may have negative impacts on the functionality of the CNS, causing atrophy and altering connectivity, particularly in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. In addition, glucocorticoids can increase the number of inflammatory cells and produce proinflammatory cytokines, both within the CNS and the periphery. Hyperactivity of the HPA axis may also be linked to the neuroinflammatory process (57). Cytokines can activate the HPA axis and impair the function of the GR at various levels. These effects occur through the inhibition of GR translocation to the nucleus, the inhibition of GR-mediated gene transcription or the stimulation of GRβ (the inactive form of GR) synthesis (68).
Melatonin is involved in the regulation of sleep-wake cycles and thus affects 5-HT receptor-mediated activation of the HPA axis. Therefore, SSRIs-induced changes in melatonin levels could explain alterations in cortisol levels during wakefulness, suggesting that SSRIs may affect the HPA axis through modulation of corticosteroid receptors (69).
Flandreau et al (57) demonstrated that escitalopram has a significant impact on several genes, such as glucocorticoid receptors, which contributes to its effect on HPA axis activity. In this study, GR transcription increased in the hypothalamus and hippocampus of both the control group and the group with chronic corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) overexpression in the central nucleus of the amygdala of Wistar rats. This occurred due to the potential of escitalopram to increase GR levels. CRF is a 41-amino-acid peptide discovered due to its role in regulating HPA axis activity and has since been identified as a key mediator of the endocrine response, since imbalance of this stress response-related system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders, particularly MDD (57).
However, the results of a previous study indicated that escitalopram may reduce HPA axis reactivity and lower τ phosphorylation levels, improving the behavior in depressed and resistant rats (resistant to chronic stress) (67), meaning that escitalopram normalizes the reactivity of the HPA axis in depressed patients by inhibiting the release of CRF in the central nucleus of the amygdala, and increases the density of the GR in the hippocampus and hypothalamus. In this sense, the escitalopram S-enantiomer exhibits efficacy in the normalization of different pathophysiological parameters related to the function of the HPA axis, since, according to another study, escitalopram reduces cortisol concentrations in patients with generalized anxiety disorder, which is also associatedwith clinical improvement (70). This therapeutic mechanism is distinct from its effect on depressive symptoms. Therefore, it is concluded that the pharmacodynamic influence of escitalopram specifically reduces the activity of the HPA axis (71).
Effect on gonads
Escitalopram may also have an effect on semen parameters. Koyuncu et al (64) found a significant decrease in sperm concentration, motility and morphology, suggesting that these negative changes may be linked to impaired sperm transport. However, other factors such as sperm membrane damage, alterations in hormonal homeostasis and sperm DNA damage, may also be attributed to escitalopram. In 2013, Bourke et al (72) conducted a study on pregnant women and found that prenatal exposure to escitalopram did not affect targets in the hippocampus of offspring. Similarly, employing an epigenome-wide sequencing approach, researchers discovered that neither clinical maternal psychiatric illness nor prenatal antidepressant exposure is connected to methylation differences in fetal-origin cord blood (73). Consequently, an assay conducted during prenatal exposure to escitalopram indicated that exposure did not result in any changes in the behavior or gene expression of several neuropsychiatric targets in the hippocampus of rats (72).
6. Paroxetine
Among all the currently available SSRIs, paroxetine, a phenylpiperidine derivative, is known to be the most effective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor despite being a poor inhibitor of NE uptake (74). Since paroxetine has a lower affinity for the histaminergic, dopaminergic or catecholaminergic systems than TCAs, it is less likely to have adverse effects towards the central and autonomic nervous systems. It should also be noted that paroxetine has a certain affinity for the muscarinic cholinergic receptor, although this is lower than that of TCAs (74,75).
Effect on gonads
Paroxetine inhibits aromatases, which can alter the balance between androgens and estrogens. In addition, in an in vitro study using the human adrenocarcinoma cell line H295R, paroxetine was observed to alter steroid secretion. An increase in progesterone and a decrease in testosterone were also observed during paroxetine exposure, suggesting inhibition of CYP17 and perhaps CYP21(76). However, paroxetine exposure produced an increase in 17β-estradiol, suggesting, in contrast to previous data, a stimulatory effect on aromatase (76). Paroxetine is also associated with an increased risk of delayed ejaculation, decreased sexual desire and impotence, implying the inability to achieve an erection in men and inadequate lubrication in women (77). Furthermore, a study has shown that the risk of SD is higher in paroxetine users compared with other SSRIs (77). Previous studies have also shown that paroxetine has a significant negative impact on the sexual function of male rats (lower Johnsen scores and testicular volume) (41) and increases the serum estradiol levels in female rats (78). By contrast, chronic exposure to paroxetine does not affect the serum levels of FSH and LH in female rats; however, chronic postnatal exposure to paroxetine may alter the timing of puberty and reproductive functions in female rats (78).
7. Sertraline
Sertraline is commonly used to treat disorders such as depression, OCD, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and anxiety (79). However, sertraline has a potential negative effect on the reproductive system, as it has been reported to have an inhibitory effect on the aromatase enzyme, resulting in decreased hormone production in H295R cells (76), and it was shown that certain N-demethylated metabolites of sertraline inhibit aromatase with greater potency compared with sertraline (76). However, demethylated sertraline is a weaker SERT reuptake inhibitor than sertraline. Nonetheless, demethylated sertraline may contribute to the prolonged SERT blockade obtained with sertraline administration, and laboratory investigations have shown this to be more potent in mice than in rats (80). It remains elusive to what extent norsertraline (desmehtylsertraline) enhances the therapeutic efficacy of the parent compound in humans (80,81).
Another undesirable side effect of sertraline is its relationship with sexual disorders (82). This is associated with hormonal abnormalities and decreased fertility, as it decreases the levels of testosterone, LH and FSH and increases prolactin in male rats (83). A possible explanation for these adverse effects is that sertraline may interfere with steroidogenesis. This interference can occur both indirectly, by inhibiting the transcription of regulatory genes associated with steroidogenesis, and directly, by inhibiting the steroidogenic CYP enzymes (84). In addition, the negative sexual effects of SSRIs are often linked to an elevation in the pituitary hormone prolactin, which has several physiological effects that reduce fertility and libido. As a result, hyperprolactinemia is a common occurrence with the use of sertraline. Thus, SSRIs increase prolactin release in vivo through two different impacts on the tuberoinfundibular dopamine neuroendocrine (TIDA) network, both of which result in reduced dopamine production. First, by increasing 5-HT levels, SSRIs potentiate the potassium-mediated hyperpolarization potassium inward rectifier, 5-HT1A/G protein-coupled rectifier. Second, independently of 5-HT, SSRIs decrease intrinsic TIDA excitability by suppressing oscillatory activity and action potential discharge through reductions in transient sodium currents. When these effects are combined, the TIDA system shuts down, resulting in increased prolactin release (83). Thus, these findings point to a unique mechanism for sertraline-induced hyperprolactinemia and sexual adverse effects (83,85).
It has been shown that sertraline exhibits a negative effect on testicular tissues due to the action of 5-HT on reproductive hormone regulation and spermatogenesis, causing dose-dependent toxicity in testicular tissue. The reproductive toxicity of sertraline was also characterized by a significant decrease in sperm concentration and a significantly altered sperm morphology and motility (86). Consistent with previous research, sertraline treatment caused oxidative stress in testicular tissue in rats, evidenced by an increase in lipid peroxidation and a weakening of the antioxidant defense system. Furthermore, lipid peroxidation often causes alterations in biological membrane permeability and fluidity, which can have a significant impact on cellular integrity (87). It has been shown that sertraline-induced reproductive damage is mainly caused by ROS, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage and reduced GSH levels. The cause of oxidative stress is a disruption in the balance between the creation of ROS and the intracellular capacity to scavenge ROS, leading to severe cellular damage (88). It is important to note that oxidative stress has been linked to a decrease in cell mass and a loss of pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 expression (89).
Pancreas
Prolonged SSRI use has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of diabetes. In cultured Min6 cells and isolated mouse islets, the short-term inhibitory effects of sertraline were shown to be due to a significant decrease in GSIS (3). The mechanism underlying this effect may involve the activation of insulin substrate receptor-2 (IRS-2) kinases such as glycogen synthase kinase-3, which enhance IRS-2 phosphorylation at selective inhibitory Ser sites, resulting in insulin inhibition (3). A previous study in rats showed that exposure to sertraline during gestation did not affect the birth weight of the offspring. However, it did result in a reduction in the pancreatic β-cell area (90).
8. Fluvoxamine
Fluvoxamine is a commonly prescribed medication for the treatment of OCD and has a powerful and selective inhibitory effect on the presynaptic 5-HT reuptake. By contrast, it has minimal affinity for α1-adrenergic, α2-adrenergic, β3-adrenergic, dopamine2, histamine H1, 5-HT1, 5-HT2 and muscarinic receptors, and does not inhibit MAO (91,92). It has also been demonstrated that fluvoxamine exerts an influence on the hormonal response (93). A study on patients with borderline personality disorder demonstrated that fluvoxamine reduces the hyperresponsiveness of the HPA axis, as evidenced by a reduction in the ACTH and cortisol response to the dexamethasone/CRH test (94). In another study, fluvoxamine was administered to patients with postmenopausal climacteric symptoms (50 mg/day) over a 6-week period. The results indicated that fluvoxamine was effective in alleviating climacteric symptoms, suggesting that it may act by modulating the levels of sex hormones (95). Furthermore, a study on ovariectomized rats demonstrated that fluvoxamine is also able to improve estrogen-dependent changes in behavior, suggesting an important role in the modulation of this group of hormones (96). In addition, at a dose of 25 mg/kg, fluvoxamine was observed to increase plasma levels of β-endorphin and β-lipotropin in male rats, as well as stimulate prolactin secretion (97). This effect was attributed to its ability to affect the 5-HT pathway, although there is currently no clear evidence to support this hypothesis. Fluvoxamine has also been demonstrated to reduce leptin resistance (98). Leptin resistance is defined by a diminished sense of satiety, an increased intake of nutrients and an augmented total body mass, which frequently culminates in obesity (99).
9. Effect of SSRIs on thyroid hormones
The potential impact of SSRIs on thyroid function has been a subject of interest due to the possibility of interactions between these medications and thyroid hormones. Research has demonstrated that SSRIs can influence thyroid function by affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis. A number of studies have indicated that treatment with SSRIs may lead to changes in thyroid hormone levels, which could potentially affect thyroid function (100-102). A meta-analysis by Caye et al (101) evaluated thyroid function before and after SSRI treatment in euthyroid patients with depression. They found that SSRI treatment was associated with a reduction in T4 and free T4 levels, as well as a decline in T3, but there was no impact on TSH levels. Fluoxetine has been found to enhance the activity of the 5'D-II deiodinase isoenzyme, which converts T4 to the active compound T3(102). In a study by de Carvalho et al (103), euthyroid patients with depression who were treated with fluoxetine exhibited a significant reduction in T3 and T4 levels. A case study of a 53-year-old woman reported that escitalopram induced hypothyroidism, despite the patient being reported as asymptomatic (104). A similar case was reported in a 56-year-old man who, following treatment with paroxetine, was diagnosed with hypothyroidism. However, in this case, the patient exhibited symptoms (105). These findings suggest that SSRIs may have a detrimental effect on thyroid function. Of note, in clinical practice, experts have explored the potential benefits of supplementing T3 with SSRIs as a way to enhance the efficacy of antidepressant treatment. While there is more robust evidence supporting the use of T3 with tricyclic antidepressants, the evidence for combining T3 with SSRIs is more limited (106). In fact, the relationship between thyroid function and depression is complex. In certain cases, thyroid hormone supplements can actually help antidepressant drugs work better (107). It has been suggested that T3 adjuvant administration could be worth considering in patients who do not respond to tricyclic antidepressants or SSRIs, particularly if they have subclinical hypothyroidism or autoimmune thyroiditis (108). Nevertheless, the evidence in this field remains scarce and further investigation is required.
10. Conclusions
SSRIs, the most widely utilized antidepressants worldwide, have been shown to have adverse effects on the endocrine system, emphasized by a dysregulation in glucose metabolism, sexual function and fertility (Table I). This alarming topic necessitates particular consideration, as the awareness of these effects could aid physicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment plan and, more notably, in monitoring the clinical progress of patients during SSRI treatment, with particular emphasis on the endocrine system.
The present review encompasses in vitro, clinical and preclinical studies. However, it should be noted that this work has certain limitations. Firstly, only preclinical studies in rodents were considered in order to circumscribe this review. Secondly, the time period for the literature search was not delimited. Consequently, the majority of the included literature was from the past 12 years. However, certain key papers published prior to 12 years ago were included due to their continued relevance. In addition, the literature search only included English-language articles and was conducted exclusively in the PubMed database.
This work compiles pertinent data on the effects of SSRIs on the endocrine system, which could assist clinicians in selecting the most suitable treatment and clinical follow-up. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies with clinical follow-up of SSRI-treated patients, while incorporating sex hormones, thyroid profile and pancreatic function monitoring.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: The study was supported by Sistema Nacional de Investigadoras e Investigadores-Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías, México (grant nos. CVU248685 to EAC and CVU169786 to GPS). The National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñíz of México partially supported this work.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
Conceptualization: GPS and EAC; investigation: CRS and CVRP; supervision: GPS and EAC; visualization: GPS and EAC; writing-original draft: CRS, CVRP, GPS and EAC; writing-reviewing and editing: GPS and EAC. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Alboni S, Van DIjk RM, Poggini S, Milior G, Perrotta M, Drenth T, Brunello N, Wolfer DP, Limatola C, Amrein I, et al: Fluoxetine effects on molecular, cellular and behavioral endophenotypes of depression are driven by the living environment. Mol Psychiatry. 22:552–561. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Isaac R, Boura-Halfon S, Gurevitch D, Shainskaya A, Levkovitz Y and Zick Y: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) inhibit insulin secretion and action in pancreatic β cells. J Biol Chem. 288:5682–5693. 2013. | |
Berardelli R, Margarito E, Ghiggia F, Picu A, Balbo M, Bonelli L, Giordano R, Karamouzis I, Bo M, Ghigo E and Arvat E: Neuroendocrine effects of citalopram, a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, during lifespan in humans. J Endocrinol Invest. 33:657–662. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ruhé HG, Khoenkhoen SJ, Ottenhof KW, Koeter MW, Mocking RJT and Schene AH: Longitudinal effects of the SSRI paroxetine on salivary cortisol in major depressive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 52:261–271. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dubovicky M, Belovicova K, Csatlosova K and Bogi E: Risks of using SSRI/SNRI antidepressants during pregnancy and lactation. Interdiscip Toxicol. 10:30–34. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Avitsur R: Prenatal fluoxetine modifies the behavioral and hormonal responses to stress in male mice: Role for glucocorticoid insensitivity. Behav Pharmacol. 28:345–355. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Edinoff AN, Akuly HA, Hanna TA, Ochoa CO, Patti SJ, Ghaffar YA, Kaye AD, Viswanath O, Urits I, Boyer AG, et al: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse effects: A narrative review. Neurol Int. 13:387–401. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Malagié I, Trillat AC, Jacquot C and Gardier AM: Effects of acute fluoxetine on extracellular serotonin levels in the raphe: An in vivo microdialysis study. Eur J Pharmacol. 286:213–217. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Perez-Caballero L, Torres-Sanchez S, Bravo L, Mico JA and Berrocoso E: Fluoxetine: A case history of its discovery and preclinical development. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 9:567–578. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wille SMR, Cooreman SG, Neels HM and Lambert WEE: Relevant issues in the monitoring and the toxicology of antidepressants. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 45:25–89. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Catterson ML and Preskorn SH: Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Clinical relevance. Pharmacol Toxicol. 78:203–208. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Benfield P, Heel RC and Lewis SP: Fluoxetine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs. 32:481–508. 1986.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Reis M, Aamo T, Spigset O and Ahlner J: Serum concentrations of antidepressant drugs in a naturalistic setting: Compilation based on a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. Ther Drug Monit. 31:42–56. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gomez F and García-García L: Anxiogenic-like effects of fluoxetine render adult male rats vulnerable to the effects of a novel stress. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 153:32–44. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Alboni S, Benatti C, Montanari C, Tascedda F and Brunello N: Chronic antidepressant treatments resulted in altered expression of genes involved in inflammation in the rat hypothalamus. Eur J Pharmacol. 721:158–167. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pawluski JL, Rayen I, Niessen NA, Kristensen S, van Donkelaar EL, Balthazart J, Steinbusch HW and Charlier TD: Developmental fluoxetine exposure differentially alters central and peripheral measures of the HPA system in adolescent male and female offspring. Neuroscience. 220:131–141. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Knaepen L, Rayen I, Charlier TD, Fillet M, Houbart V, van Kleef M, Steinbusch HW, Patijn J, Tibboel D, Joosten EA and Pawluski JL: Developmental fluoxetine exposure normalizes the long-term effects of maternal stress on post-operative pain in Sprague-Dawley rat offspring. PLoS One. 8(e57608)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gemmel M, Hazlett M, Bögi E, De Lacalle S, Hill LA, Kokras N, Hammond GL, Dalla C, Charlier TD and Pawluski JL: Perinatal fluoxetine effects on social play, the HPA system, and hippocampal plasticity in pre-adolescent male and female rats: Interactions with pre-gestational maternal stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 84:159–171. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Avitsur R, Grinshpahet R, Goren N, Weinstein I, Kirshenboim O and Chlebowski N: Prenatal SSRI alters the hormonal and behavioral responses to stress in female mice: Possible role for glucocorticoid resistance. Horm Behav. 84:41–49. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ghaeli P, Shahsavand E, Mesbahi M, Kamkar MZ, Sadeghi M and Dashti-Khavidaki S: Comparing the effects of 8-week treatment with fluoxetine and imipramine on fasting blood glucose of patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 24:386–388. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pan SJ, Tan YL, Yao SW, Xin Y, Yang X, Liu J and Xiong J: Fluoxetine induces lipid metabolism abnormalities by acting on the liver in patients and mice with depression. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 39:1463. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Masand PS and Gupta S: Long-term side effects of newer-generation antidepressants: SSRIS, venlafaxine, nefazodone, bupropion, and mirtazapine. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 14:175–182. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Shahsavand Ananloo E, Ghaeli P, Kamkar MZ and Sadeghi M: Comparing the effects of fluoxetine and imipramine on total cholesterol, triglyceride, and weight in patients with major depression. Daru. 21(4)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Biagetti B and Corcoy R: Hypoglycemia associated with fluoxetine treatment in a patient with type 1 diabetes. World J Clin Cases. 1:169–171. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Giri D, Price V, Yung Z, Didi M and Senniappan S: Fluoxetine-induced hypoglycaemia in a patient with congenital hyperinsulinism on lanreotide therapy. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 8:347–350. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Andersohn F, Schade R, Suissa S and Garbe E: Long-term use of antidepressants for depressive disorders and the risk of diabetes mellitus. Am J Psychiatry. 166:591–598. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sawka AM, Burgart V and Zimmerman D: Loss of hypoglycemia awareness in an adolescent with type 1 diabetes mellitus during treatment with fluoxetine hydrochloride. J Pediatr. 136:394–396. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Deeg MA and Lipkin EW: Hypoglycemia associated with the use of fluoxetine. West J Med. 164:262–263. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Preeti S, Jayaram SD and Chittaranjan A: Sexual dysfunction in patients with antidepressant-treated anxiety or depressive disorders: A pragmatic multivariable longitudinal study. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 28:9–16. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
AlBreiki M, Al Maqbali M, AlRisi K, AlSinawi H, AlBalushi M and Al Zakwani W: Prevalence of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction among psychiatric outpatients attending a tertiary care hospital. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 25:55–60. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rowland D, McMahon CG, Abdo C, Chen J, Jannini E, Waldinger MD and Ahn TY: Disorders of orgasm and ejaculation in men. J Sex Med. 7:1668–1686. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Solomon R, Shvartsur R and Azab AN: The association between psychotropic drug use and fertility problems among male subjects. J Psychiatr Pract. 25:22–33. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Trenque T, Maura G, Herlem E, Vallet C, Sole E, Auriche P and Drame M: Reports of sexual disorders related to serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the French pharmacovigilance database: An example of underreporting. Drug Saf. 36:515–519. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Relwani R, Berger D, Santoro N, Hickmon C, Nihsen M, Zapantis A, Werner M, Polotsky AJ and Jindal S: Semen parameters are unrelated to BMI but vary with SSRI use and prior urological surgery. Reprod Sci. 18:391–397. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Safarinejad MR: Sperm DNA damage and semen quality impairment after treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors detected using semen analysis and sperm chromatin structure assay. J Urol. 180:2124–2128. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Moore CJ, DeLong NE, Chan KA, Holloway AC, Petrik JJ and Sloboda DM: Perinatal administration of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor induces impairments in reproductive function and follicular dynamics in female rat offspring. Reprod Sci. 22:1297–1311. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ayala ME, Gonzáles A, Olivarez RM and Aragón-Martínez A: Fluoxetine treatment of prepubertal male rats uniformly diminishes sex hormone levels and, in a subpopulation of animals, negatively affects sperm quality. Reprod Fertil Dev. 30:1329–1341. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
de Oliveira WM, de Sá IR, de Torres SM, de Morais RN, Andrade AM, Maia FC, Tenorio BM and da Silva Junior VA: Perinatal exposure to fluoxetine via placenta and lactation inhibits the testicular development in male rat offspring. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 59:244–250. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Elsedawi BF, Hussein Y, Sabry MA and Aziz JA: Effect of fluoxetine on the testes of adult albino rats and the possible protective role of curcumin. Anat Sci Int. 96:187–196. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Erdemir F, Atilgan D, Firat F, Markoc F, Parlaktas BS and Sogut E: The effect of sertraline, paroxetine, fluoxetine and escitalopram on testicular tissue and oxidative stress parameters in rats. Int Braz J Urol. 40:100–108. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sakr HF, Abbas AM, Elsamanoudy AZ and Ghoneim FM: Effect of fluoxetine and resveratrol on testicular functions and oxidative stress in a rat model of chronic mild stress-induced depression. J Physiol Pharmacol. 66:515–527. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Câmara ML, Almeida TB, de Santi F, Rodrigues BM, Cerri PS, Beltrame FL and Sasso-Cerri E: Fluoxetine-induced androgenic failure impairs the seminiferous tubules integrity and increases ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL1): Possible androgenic control of UCHL1 in germ cell death? Biomed Pharmacother. 109:1126–1139. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Monteiro Filho WO, de Torres SM, Amorim MJ, Andrade AJ, de Morais RN, Tenorio BM and da Silva Junior VA: Fluoxetine induces changes in the testicle and testosterone in adult male rats exposed via placenta and lactation. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 60:274–281. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
dos Santos AH, Vieira ML, de Azevedo Camin N, Anselmo-Franci JA, Ceravolo GS, Pelosi GG, Moreira EG, Kiss AC, Mesquita Sde F and Gerardin DC: In utero and lactational exposure to fluoxetine delays puberty onset in female rats offspring. Reprod Toxicol. 62:1–8. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Romero-Reyes J, Cárdenas M, Damián-Matsumura P, Domínguez R and Ayala ME: Inhibition of serotonin reuptake in the prepubertal rat ovary by fluoxetine and effects on ovarian functions. Reprod Toxicol. 59:80–88. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
De Long NE, Hyslop JR, Raha S, Hardy DB and Holloway AC: Fluoxetine-induced pancreatic beta cell dysfunction: New insight into the benefits of folic acid in the treatment of depression. J Affect Disord. 166:6–13. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cataldo LR, Cortés VA, Mizgier ML, Aranda E, Mezzano D, Olmos P, Galgani JE, Suazo J and Santos JL: Fluoxetine impairs insulin secretion without modifying extracellular serotonin levels in MIN6 β-cells. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 123:473–478. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Grankvist K, Marklund SL and Täljedal IB: CuZn-superoxide dismutase, Mn-superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase in pancreatic islets and other tissues in the mouse. Biochem J. 199:393–398. 1981.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lenzen S, Drinkgern J and Tiedge M: Low antioxidant enzyme gene expression in pancreatic islets compared with various other mouse tissues. Free Radic Biol Med. 20:463–466. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Elmorsy E, Al-Ghafari A, Helaly ANM, Hisab AS, Oehrle B and Smith PA: Editor's highlight: Therapeutic concentrations of antidepressants inhibit pancreatic beta-cell function via mitochondrial complex inhibition. Toxicol Sci. 158:286–301. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dissanayake WC, Sorrenson B and Shepherd PR: The role of adherens junction proteins in the regulation of insulin secretion. Biosci Rep. 38(BSR20170989)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chang HY, Chen SL, Shen MR, Kung ML, Chuang LM and Chen YW: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, impairs E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and alters calcium homeostasis in pancreatic beta cells. Sci Rep. 7(3515)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tharmaraja T, Stahl D, Hopkins CWP, Persaud SJ, Jones PM, Ismail K and Moulton CD: The association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and glycemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychosom Med. 81:570–583. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ye Z, Chen L, Yang Z, Li Q, Huang Y, He M, Zhang S, Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhao W, et al: Metabolic effects of fluoxetine in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. PLoS One. 6(e21551)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu B, Ruz-Maldonado I, Toczyska K, Olaniru OE, Zariwala MG, Hopkins D, Zhao M and Persaud SJ: The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine has direct effects on beta cells, promoting insulin secretion and increasing beta-cell mass. Diabetes Obes Metab. 24:2038–2050. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Flandreau EI, Bourke CH, Ressler KJ, Vale WW, Nemeroff CB and Owens MJ: Escitalopram alters gene expression and HPA axis reactivity in rats following chronic overexpression of corticotropin-releasing factor from the central amygdala. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 38:1349–1361. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hansen CH, Larsen LW, Sørensen AM, Halling-Sørensen B and Styrishave B: The six most widely used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors decrease androgens and increase estrogens in the H295R cell line. Toxicol In Vitro. 41:1–11. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nikisch G, Mathé AA, Czernik A, Thiele J, Bohner J, Eap CB, Agren H and Baumann P: Long-term citalopram administration reduces responsiveness of HPA axis in patients with major depression: Relationship with S-citalopram concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and clinical response. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 181:751–760. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jørgensen H, Knigge U, Kjær A, Møller M and Warberg J: Serotonergic stimulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone and pro-opiomelanocortin gene expression. J Neuroendocrinol. 14:788–795. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Durell N, Franks R, Coon S, Cowart K and Carris NW: Effect of antidepressants on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist-related weight loss. J Pharm Technol. 38:283–288. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ilgin S, Kilic G, Baysal M, Kilic V, Korkut B, Ucarcan S and Atli O: Citalopram induces reproductive toxicity in male rats. Birth Defects Res. 109:475–485. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Prasad P, Ogawa S and Parhar IS: Serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram inhibits GnRH synthesis and spermatogenesis in the male zebrafish. Biol Reprod. 93(102)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Koyuncu H, Serefoglu EC, Yencilek E, Atalay H, Akbas NB and Sarıca K: Escitalopram treatment for premature ejaculation has a negative effect on semen parameters. Int J Impot Res. 23:257–261. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sanchez C, Reines EH and Montgomery SA: A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike? Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 29:185–196. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pastoor D and Gobburu J: Clinical pharmacology review of escitalopram for the treatment of depression. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 10:121–128. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wu C, Gong WG, Wang YJ, Sun JJ, Zhou H, Zhang ZJ and Ren QG: Escitalopram alleviates stress-induced Alzheimer's disease-like tau pathologies and cognitive deficits by reducing hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity and insulin/GSK-3β signal pathway activity. Neurobiol Aging. 67:137–147. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Benatti C, Alboni S, Blom JMC, Mendlewicz J, Tascedda F and Brunello N: Molecular changes associated with escitalopram response in a stress-based model of depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 87:74–82. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ronaldson A, Carvalho LA, Kostich K, Lazzarino AI, Urbanova L and Steptoe A: The effects of six-day SSRI administration on diurnal cortisol secretion in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 235:3415–3422. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tafet GE and Nemeroff CB: Pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders: The role of the HPA axis. Front Psychiatry. 11(443)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Knorr U, Vinberg M, Gether U, Winkel P, Gluud C, Wetterslev J and Kessing LV: The effect of escitalopram versus placebo on perceived stress and salivary cortisol in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with depression-A randomised trial. Psychiatry Res. 200:354–360. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bourke CH, Stowe ZN, Neigh GN, Olson DE and Owens MJ: Prenatal exposure to escitalopram and/or stress in rats produces limited effects on endocrine, behavioral, or gene expression measures in adult male rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 39:100–109. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schroeder JW, Smith AK, Brennan PA, Conneely KN, Kilaru V, Knight BT, Newport DJ, Cubells JF and Stowe ZN: DNA methylation in neonates born to women receiving psychiatric care. Epigenetics. 7:409–414. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nevels RM, Gontkovsky ST and Williams BE: Paroxetine-the antidepressant from hell? Probably not, but caution required. Psychopharmacol Bull. 46:77–104. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bourin M, Chue P and Guillon Y: Paroxetine: A review. CNS Drug Rev. 7:25–47. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jacobsen NW, Hansen CH, Nellemann C, Styrishave B and Halling-Sørensen B: Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on three sex steroids in two versions of the aromatase enzyme inhibition assay and in the H295R cell assay. Toxicol In Vitro. 29:1729–1735. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jing E and Straw-Wilson K: Sexual dysfunction in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and potential solutions: A narrative literature review. Ment Health Clin. 6:191–196. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ulker N, Yardimci A, Kaya Tektemur N, Colakoglu N, Ozcan M, Canpolat S and Kelestimur H: Chronic exposure to paroxetine or bupropion modulates the pubertal maturation and the reproductive system in female rats. Reprod Biol. 20:154–163. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Singh HK and Saadabadi A: Sertraline. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2023. | |
Fuller RW, Hemrick-Luecke SK, Littlefield ES and Audia JE: Comparison of desmethylsertraline with sertraline as a monoamine uptake inhibitor in vivo. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 19:135–149. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
López-Muñoz F and Alamo C: Active metabolites as antidepressant drugs: The role of norquetiapine in the mechanism of action of quetiapine in the treatment of mood disorders. Front Psychiatry. 4(102)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rothmore J: Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Med J Aust. 212:329–334. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lyons DJ, Ammari R, Hellysaz A and Broberger C: Serotonin and antidepressant SSRIs inhibit rat neuroendocrine dopamine neurons: Parallel actions in the lactotrophic axis. J Neurosci. 36:7392–7406. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Munkboel CH, Larsen LW, Weisser JJ, Møbjerg Kristensen D and Styrishave B: Sertraline suppresses testis and adrenal steroid production and steroidogenic gene expression while increasing LH in plasma of male rats resulting in compensatory hypogonadism. Toxicol Sci. 163:609–619. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gregorian RS, Golden KA, Bahce A, Goodman C, Kwong WJ and Khan ZM: Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Ann Pharmacother. 36:1577–1589. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hamdi H: The preventive role of wheat germ oil against sertraline-induced testicular damage in male albino rats. Andrologia. 51(e13369)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Van der Paal J, Neyts EC, Verlackt CCW and Bogaerts A: Effect of lipid peroxidation on membrane permeability of cancer and normal cells subjected to oxidative stress. Chem Sci. 7:489–498. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Atli O, Baysal M, Aydogan-Kilic G, Kilic V, Ucarcan S, Karaduman B and Ilgin S: Sertraline-induced reproductive toxicity in male rats: Evaluation of possible underlying mechanisms. Asian J Androl. 19:672–679. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pinney SE and Simmons RA: Epigenetic mechanisms in the development of type 2 diabetes. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 21:223–229. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
De Long NE, Gutgesell MK, Petrik JJ and Holloway AC: Fetal exposure to sertraline hydrochloride impairs pancreatic β-cell development. Endocrinology. 156:1952–1957. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Benfield P and Ward A: Fluvoxamine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs. 32:313–334. 1986.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sukhatme VP, Reiersen AM, Vayttaden SJ and Sukhatme VV: Fluvoxamine: A review of its mechanism of action and its role in COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 12(652688)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Anderson IM, Deakin JF and Miller HE: The effect of chronic fluvoxamine on hormonal and psychological responses to buspirone in normal volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 128:74–82. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rinne T, de Kloet ER, Wouters L, Goekoop JG, de Rijk RH and van den Brink W: Fluvoxamine reduces responsiveness of HPA axis in adult female BPD patients with a history of sustained childhood abuse. Neuropsychopharmacol. 28:126–132. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Oishi A, Mochizuki Y, Otsu R and Inaba N: Pilot study of fluvoxamine treatment for climacteric symptoms in Japanese women. Biopsychosoc Med. 1(12)2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ishibashi Y, Izumo N, Iwata K, Morikawa T, Kameyama T, Watanabe Y, Manabe T and Matsuzaki H: Research and Report Fluvoxamine reverses estrogen-dependent decline in voluntary activities and decreased amygdala levels of serotonin in ovariectomized rats. J Brain Sci. 46:5–19. 2016. | |
Cella S, Pen̄alva A, Locatelli V, Novelli A, Cocchi D and Müller EE: Neuroendocrine studies with fluvoxamine: Animal data. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 15 (Suppl 3):357S–364S. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hosoi T, Miyahara T, Kayano T, Yokoyama S and Ozawa K: Fluvoxamine attenuated endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced leptin resistance. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 3(12)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Obradovic M, Sudar-Milovanovic E, Soskic S, Essack M, Arya S, Stewart AJ, Gojobori T and Isenovic ER: Leptin and obesity: Role and clinical implication. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 12(585887)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kotkowska Z and Strzelecki D: Depression and autoimmune hypothyroidism-their relationship and the effects of treating psychiatric and thyroid disorders on changes in clinical and biochemical parameters including BDNF and other cytokines-A systematic review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 15(391)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Caye A, Pilz LK, Maia AL, Hidalgo MP, Furukawa TA and Kieling C: The impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the thyroid function among patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 33:139–145. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baumgartner A, Dubeyko M, Campos-Barros A, Eravci M and Meinhold H: Subchronic administration of fluoxetine to rats affects triiodothyronine production and deiodination in regions of the cortex and in the limbic forebrain. Brain Res. 635:68–74. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
de Carvalho GA, Bahls SC, Boeving A and Graf H: Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on thyroid function in depressed patients with primary hypothyroidism or normal thyroid function. Thyroid. 19:691–697. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Eker SS, Akkaya C, Ersoy C, Sarandol A and Kirli S: Reversible escitalopram-induced hypothyroidism. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 32:559.e5–e7. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Takahashi M, Sawayama E, Sawayama T and Miyaoka H: Reversible paroxetine-induced symptomatic hypothyroidism. Pharmacopsychiatry. 40:201–202. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cooper-Kazaz R and Lerer B: Efficacy and safety of triiodothyronine supplementation in patients with major depressive disorder treated with specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 11:685–699. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hage M and Azar ST: The link between thyroid function and depression. J Thyroid Res. 2012(590648)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jackson IM: Does thyroid hormone have a role as adjunctive therapy in depression? Thyroid. 6:63–7. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |