Expression and significance of 90K/Mac‑2BP in prostate cancer
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 25, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2012.768
- Pages: 181-184
Abstract
Introduction
Prostate cancer has become the most common cancer among males in the United States, surpassing lung cancer, and is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality (1,2). In China, the incidence of prostate cancer is gradually increasing. Due to the absence of a reliable early diagnostic method, most prostate cancer incidences are diagnosed during the late stages, leading to high mortality. As the elderly population increases, prostate cancer becomes a significant international health problem. Prostate cancer has a wide range of individual differences and variability and is more invasive than other tumors. No standard methods for prostate cancer prevention, early diagnosis, treatment or prognosis are currently available (3). Prognostic indicators that benefit the early diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer are required to establish a reliable diagnostic method (4).
In the present study, the protein expression of prostate cancer, normal prostate and benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues were screened using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis to identify early diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic markers for prostate cancer.
Materials and methods
Samples
All tissue samples for proteomic research were obtained from the Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital (Guiyang, China) between July 2009 and May 2001. The samples included 10 each of prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate tissues, respectively, The patients were 55–76 years of age, with a mean age of 65.8 years and a median age of 65 years. The patients did not receive preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. All specimens were pathologically confirmed to be prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia or normal prostate tissue. All samples were immediately stored at −80°C. This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of the People’s Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuchang, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Tissue protein extraction
Up to 100 mg of tissue samples were collected and cut into sections. Cell lysate (∼300 ml) and phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (200 mmol/l) were added to the samples, which were then homogenated, ultrasonically treated and centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then transferred into a new EP tube. The protein was purified according to the kit instructions (Goodtime Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), and the protein concentration was measured.
2-DE gel electrophoresis
The protein sample was placed in an isoelectric focusing (IEF) strip slot, and dry-immobilized pH gradient strips were added for the first-dimension electrophoresis. The IEF parameters were set as follows: 30 V, 12 h (strip rehydration); 500 V, 1 h; 1 kV, 1 h; and 8 kV, 30 min. Following IEF, the balance strip was balanced in a buffer. The tape was transferred to 12.5% SDS-PAGE gel (GE company, USA) for the second electrophoresis. The parameters were set to 2 W/gel for 50 min, and then changed to 17 W/gel until the indicator reached the bottom edge of the electrophoresis gel. The gel was stained according to the instructions of the Deep Purple staining method.
Image acquisition and analysis
The gel was analyzed using a Typhoon 9400 gel imaging system. The mass spectrum was analyzed using Image Master Software. The points of difference were found by gel image recognition and analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using a Student’s t-test. Protein spots expressed differentially by >2-fold were selected. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant protein spot.
Obtaining the mass spectra
The stained gel was placed in a Spothandling workstation. The protein spots were cut automatically before being digested with trypsin and extracted. Following desalting, the sample was analyzed on a target mass matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI TOF) mass spectrometer. Peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) and the five highest ion peaks of peptide tandem MS (MS/MS) spectra were obtained.
MS data analysis
The MS data were searched using the Mascot software in the NCBInr database. The parameters were Homo sapiens species, 75 ppm peptide tolerance and 0.2 ion fragment tolerance. A protein search score >95 was considered to indicate successful protein identification.
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation. The t-test comparison was used to conduct a cross-sectional study of all continuous data. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for correlation analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Gel image analysis
The 2-D maps revealed different protein spots in the 3 groups. The number of protein spots in the prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues was greater than those in normal tissues (Fig. 1).
Map analysis
The average number of protein spots on the normal prostate, prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue gel electrophoresis were 3,066, 3,289 and 2,986, respectively. One of each group of the gels was set as a reference, and the gel patterns for 8 spots were subjected to matching analysis. The average protein points in the prostate normal tissue gel electrophoresis was used as the reference gel, and then the average protein points of the gland carcinoma tissue and benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue were compared with these, the obtained values were 85.6% and 81.3%, respectively. Further repeatability analysis revealed that the 8 spots of protein patterns in prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia were highly repeatable. When the expression of protein spots and expression levels of all protein spots totalled >3 and the same protein changes occurred in the three gel maps, the protein spots were considered to be differential.
MS results
From the 2-D maps of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia, 31 protein spots were identified as being differentially expressed by >2-fold and were selected for MALDI-TOF-MS/MS analysis. A total of 31 PMFs were obtained in 31 points.
Protein identification
The PMF data and a ProFound query were used to search the NCBInr database and protein points were identified by comparison and PMF of the proteins. A total of 18 matched scores equalled >63 points (Table I).
Discussion
In prostate cancer diagnosis, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a relative biological indicator, but it is not very specific for this type of cancer (5). Identifying the tumor markers of prostate cancer is extremely important for prostate cancer prevention, treatment and prognosis.
Oncogenes are genes that control cell growth and have the potential to induce cells to transform into malignant cells. The products of abnormal gene expression in cancer genes allow cells to proliferate indefinitely, allowing immortalization to occur. Searching for cancer genes and taking appropriate measures in cancer treatment are important means of tumor gene therapy. 90K/Mac-2BP (Mac-2 binding protein, cytomegalovirus-2 binding protein) was identified in 1986 by Iacobelli et al and is a tumor-associated antigen (6). It was detected in culture media using the monoclonal antibody SP-2 from CG-5 breast cancer cell lines and has 90-kDa subunits, hence the name 90K. 90K is a highly glycosylated secreted protein, a plant hemagglutinin Mac-2 (galectin-3) ligand. Studies have confirmed that 90K is a serum diagnostic marker for lymphoma (6) as well as lung (7), breast (8), liver (9) and ovarian cancer (10), among others (11,12). 90K is associated with the host response to tumors, which is capable of inducing the expression of cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-2 and IL-6 (13). 90K is also highly expressed in proteomic analysis of prostate cancer, indicating that it is strongly correlated with prostate cancer (14). The present study revealed that 90K is highly expressed in prostate adenocarcinoma and its expression is statistically significant in benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate tissues.
Previous studies have indicated that 90K promotes tumor metastasis and that the tumor promotion mechanism in metastasis is associated with galectins. Galectins (galectin-1 and galectin-3) mainly mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and are involved in cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Galectins are also important in tumor invasion and metastasis. Endogenous galectin ligands include laminin, fibronectin, lysosome-associated membrane protein and 90K. Galectin-1 and galectin-3 are highly expressed in tumor tissues and galectin-3 confers high metastatic potential. Inohara et al(15) revealed that 90K cross-links adjacent cells expressing galectin-l and galectin-3 residues, mediating the blood flow in tumor cell aggregation and thrombus formation and thus promoting swelling and metastatic spread. 90K-bound galectins use a combination of sugar chains. Glycosylation inhibitors inhibit 90K and galectin cross-linking (16). 90K also promotes matrilysin factor expression (17). 90K and galectins are located in the extracellular matrix and various matrix components mediate cell adhesion. Therefore, 90K and galectins enhance tumor cell adhesion and the extracellular matrix to promote the formation of new tumor cell clones. The adhesion of the extracellular matrix may aid tumor cells avoid apoptosis.
To conclude, the proteomic approach used in the present study was effective and is feasible for identifying differentially expressed proteins in prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate tissues. 90K/Mac-2BP may be important for the early diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer and may also be associated with the molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer development.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Science and Technology Fund Project, Guizhou, China [Guizhou Branch co-J Zi (2010) No. 2274].
References
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al: Cancer Statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 54:8–29. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 56:106–130. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Etzioni R, Urban N, Ramsey S, et al: The case for early detection. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:243–252. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Duffy MJ: Evidence for the clinical use of tumour markers. Ann Clin Biochem. 41:370–377. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ryan CJ and Small EJ: Prostate cancer update: 2005. Curr Opin Oncol. 18:284–288. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Iacobelli S, Sismondi P, Giai M, et al: Prognostic value of a novel circulating serum 90K antigen in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 69:172–176. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fornarini B, D’Ambrosio C, Natoli C, et al: Adhesion to 90K (Mac-2 BP) as a mechanism for lymphoma drug resistance in vivo. Blood. 96:3282–3285. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ozaki Y, Kontani K, Teramoto K, et al: Involvement of 90K/Mac-2 binding protein in cancer metastases by increased cellular adhesiveness in lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 12:1071–1077. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
Iacovazzi PA, Guerra V, Elba S, et al: Are 90K/Mac-2BP serum levels correlated with poor prognosis in HCC patients? Preliminary results. Int J Biol Markers. 18:222–226. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeimet AG, Natoli C, Herold M, et al: Circulating immunostimulatory protein 90K and soluble interleukin-2-receptor in human ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 68:34–38. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Greco C, Vona R, Cosimelli M, et al: Cell surface overexpression of galectin-3 and the presence of its ligand 90k in the blood plasma as determinants in colon neoplastic lesions. Glycobiology. 14:783–792. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grassadonia A, Tinari N, Iurisci I, et al: 90K (Mac-2 BP) and galectins in tumor progression and metastasis. Glycoconj J. 19:551–556. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Powell TJ, Schreck R, McCall M, et al: A tumor-derived protein which provides T-cell costimulation through accessory cell activation. J Immunother Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 17:209–221. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sardana G, Marshall J and Diamandis EP: Discovery of candidate tumor markers for prostate cancer via proteomic analysis of cell culture-conditioned medium. Clin Chem. 53:429–437. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Inohara H, Akahani S, Koths K and Raz A: Interactions between galecetin-3 and Mac-2-binding protein mediate cell-cell adhesion. Cancer Res. 56:4530–4534. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ulmer TA, Keeler V, Loh L, et al: Tumor-associated antigen 90K/Mac-2-binding protein: possible role in colon cancer. J Cell Biochem. 98:1351–1366. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bair EL, Nagle RB, Ulmer TA, Laferté S and Bowden GT: 90K/Mac-2 binding protein is expressed in prostate cancer and induces promatrilysin expression. Prostate. 66:283–293. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |