Eliminating the effect of pathomorphologically formed sperm on resulting gravidity using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection method

  • Authors:
    • Eva Blahová
    • Jan Máchal
    • Ladislav Máchal
    • Irena Milaković
    • Šárka Hanuláková
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 6, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1522
  • Pages: 1000-1004
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test whether it is possible to eliminate a high percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm in male ejaculate by assisted reproduction using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) method. Treatment success was evaluated by comparing fertilization, clinical pregnancy and reproduction rates between males with heavy teratospermia (≤1% morphologically normal spermatozoa) and males with a higher percentage (>1%) of normal sperm. In total, 174 patients who had previously undergone 174 ICSI cycles (1 per each pair) were evaluated retrospectively. In the group of patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology (n=37), the percentage of normal spermatozoa was ≤1%. In the second group, males with >1% normal spermatozoa (n=137) were considered as patients with mildly impaired sperm morphology. The results of partner fertilization in these two groups were compared and a lower number of fertilized oocytes was identified in the patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology (P=0.038). However, neither the gravidity nor the take-home baby rates of the partners differed between the patients with mildly and heavily impaired sperm morphology. Trends opposite to that for fertilization were observed for gravidity and delivery [odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29‑1.30; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.26‑1.24, respectively]. This indicates that the lower number of fertilized oocytes was not associated with the overall outcome of fertilization and that patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology experience the same benefit from ICSI as patients with mildly impaired sperm morphology.

Introduction

Morphological abnormalities of spermatozoa are often identified in males with problematic fertility. Male infertility may be classified as oligoasthenoteratozoospermia or azoospermia. The quality of spermatozoa has an essential effect on the fertilization of the oocyte and on the subsequent evolution of the embryo. A direct correlation exists between abnormal sperm and embryo morphology at the later stage of cleavage (1). The first two cycles of embryo cell cleavage are controlled by maternal factors, whilst the paternal effect begins to apply in the embryo from the four-cell stage (2). The quality of DNA in sperm is evaluated as an absence/incidence of fragmentations in late embryonic development, which is the late paternal effect (35).

The first pregnancy and birth of a child following the application of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) method was recorded in 1992 (6). ICSI has increased the success rates of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in couples with the male sterility factor. The fertilization rate following ICSI has been reported to be significantly higher compared with that of the subzonal insemination method (7). ICSI has been found to result in higher fertilization and pregnancy rates; it has been shown to be successful in couples with unexplained infertility (8), boundary spermiogram values (9) and immunological infertility (10), and couples who have experienced repeated failures following conventional treatment by IVF (11). Common indications for use of the ICSI method are low parameters of spermatozoa in the ejaculate. The ICSI method with ejaculated sperm may be successfully used in patients with a low count of morphologically high-quality and motile sperm in the ejaculate. Riedel et al (12) established minimum andrological parameters for in vitro fertility in conventional IVF, specifying a 5×106 cm−3 total count, 30% progressive motility and 30% normal morphology; males exhibiting worse parameters in the ejaculate had an very low prognosis of successful medical treatment. The ICSI method represents an effective procedure for this type of male infertility.

In the present study, fertilization, pregnancy and take-home baby rates were analyzed following ICSI in males with a high percentage of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa. Teratospermia is one of the key parameters in the selection of sperm suitable for ICSI. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether ICSI is a suitable treatment perspective for infertile males with heavy teratospermia (≤1% normal spermatozoa).

Materials and methods

Patients

ICSI was performed between January 2008 and February 2009 to assist reproduction in 174 infertile couples at the Assisted reproduction clinic (Brno, Czech Republic). Success of the treatment was evaluated from the male viewpoint, as the study focused on male infertility. In total, 174 males were subjected to ICSI cycles. The male patients were divided into a group of 137 individuals with mildly impaired or normal sperm morphology (>1% of normal spermatozoa) and a group of 37 individuals with heavily impaired sperm morphology (≤1% of normal spermatozoa). The mean age of the male patients was 34.9±2.8 years and the age of their female partners was 30.5±2.7 years. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine (Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic).

Semen analysis

Spermatozoa were obtained through masturbation following sexual abstinence for 3–5 days. Prior to analysis, samples were incubated for 20 min at 37°C for fluidization. The concentration, motility and morphology of the sperm were assessed according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization (4th edition, 1999). Samples were visually assessed under a microscope.

Sperm processing

Spermatozoa gained from ejaculation were processed using the swim-up method (13) and incubated at a temperature of 37°C with 5% O2, 6% CO2 and 89% N2 in Sydney IVF Sperm Medium (Cook Medical, Brisbane, Australia).

Ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval

Ovarian stimulation was induced by a long protocol in all 174 cycles using triptorelin [a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa); Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Saint-Prex, Switzerland], Metrodin [follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH); Serono, Geneva, Switzerland] and Humegon [human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG); Organon Laboratories Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK). Subcutaneous triptorelin application was initiated from the mid-luteal phase of the previous cycle and continued for 14 days until sufficient downregulation of the pituitary was achieved. The development of follicles was stimulated by FSH and hMG injections. The dose of gonadotropins was individualized, and selected according to the age of the female patient, previous stimulation and response to stimulation. Ovulation was induced by injecting 5,000 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the form of Pregnyl (Organon Laboratories Ltd.) when the two largest follicles were >18 mm. Oocytes were sampled 36 h following hCG application under general anesthesia using ultrasound control.

Oocyte handling

Cumular cells were removed from the oocytes with a denudation pipette (1–2 h following oocyte sampling by ovum pick up) using 80 IU/ml hyaluronidase (in Sydney IVF Fertilization medium) for 10–15 sec. Following the partial removal of cumular cells, the oocytes were further denudated (Sydney IVF Fertilization medium) until complete denudation. The denudated oocytes were placed in a cultivation box (Heracell; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) under conditions of 37°C, 5% O2, 6% CO2 and 89% N2, until required for ICSI. The sperm were injected into the oocytes 2–3 h following ovum pick up. Oocytes used for ICSI were in metaphase II (MII) after extrusion of the first polar body.

ICSI procedure

ICSI was conducted using an inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a micro-manipulator (Research Instruments, Falmouth, UK) and injectors (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). During ICSI, oocytes were maintained in Sydney IVF Fertilization medium, and Sydney IVF PVP (Cook Medical) was used for spermatozoa. The oocytes were placed individually into 10-μl micro-drops of Sydney IVF Fertilization medium and one micro-drop with the Sydney IVF PVP medium was injected with a 2-μl suspension of spermatozoa. Sperm were selected, immobilized, sucked into the ICSI pipette and inserted into the oocyte cytoplasm under a microscope at ×400 magnification, using Hoffman modulation contrast. Prior to injection, the morphological structure of the head, neck and tail of the sperm was assessed, as well as the possible occurrence of vacuoles in the sperm head. Following ICSI, the oocytes were transferred into Sydney IVF Cleavage medium (Cook Medical) and deposited in the cultivation box.

Assessment of fertilization, embryo cleavage and establishment of pregnancy

After 16–18 h, oocytes were checked to verify fertilization. Fertilized oocytes were separated and tested for the occurrence of the two-pronuclei (2PN) stage. The cleavage phase of the embryo was established 25–27 h following oocyte fertilization and early embryo cleavage was assessed (14). The early paternal effect of the sperm is demonstrated prior to the main activation of embryonic genome expression, as it starts between the fourth and the eighth cell stage of embryo preimplantation development (3,4). Embryos of the highest quality were transferred within 72–96 h from the sampling of oocytes using a Wallace catheter (1816N; H.G. Wallace Ltd., London, UK). Parameters evaluated in the embryos included the number and regularity of blastomeres, as well as the incidence or absence of fragments and vacuoles (15). The mean number of transferred embryos was two per transfer. The luteal phase was supported by progesterone in the form of Utrogestan (Besins Manufacturing Belgium S.A., Drogenbos, Belgium) 2× 200 mg daily or by injecting Agolutin (Biotika a.s., Slovenská L̓upča, Slovakia) 50 mg daily and 1,500 IU Pregnyl (N.V.Organon, Oss, The Netherlands on days 1, 4, 7 and 9 following embryo-transfer. In the case of positive chemical gravidity, HCG was detected on day 14 following embryo-transfer. Clinical gravidity was defined as an intrauterine identification of the gestational sac with a heart function. Abortion was defined as gravidity terminated prior to week 20 of pregnancy.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons were made between pregnancy and reproduction rates. The normality of data was tested by the Anderson-Darling normality test and by visual inspection of histograms. As specific parameters exhibited a non-normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continual data. Fisher’s exact test was applied to compare categorical data. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Oocytes injected in the MII phase totaled 2,811 and subsequent fertilization (2PN) was recorded in 2,303 oocytes (82%). Transfer was implemented in all 174 couples and the total number of transferred embryos amounted to 349 with an average count of two embryos per transfer. Clinical gravidity per transfer was achieved in 92 cases (53%). The resulting number of births was 83 (48%) with 108 live-born infants.

Table I summarizes the characteristics of the patients. Table II summarizes characteristics and outcomes of the patients and is divided into groups of males with mildly and heavily impaired sperm morphology. Statistical evaluations were performed of the age of male patients, mean count of oocytes sampled from their female partners, number of oocytes in the MII phase suitable for fertilization, number of fertilized oocytes, number of clinical gravidities and number of deliveries of live-born children. Table II indicates that while the number of fertilized oocytes in the patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology was significantly lower (P=0.038), neither gravidity nor delivery of the partners differed compared with those in the patients with mildly impaired or normal spermatozoa. Trends opposite to that for fertilization were recorded for gravidity [odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29–1.30] and delivery (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.26–1.24). These results indicate that the lower number of fertilized oocytes was not associated with the overall result.

Table I

Basic characteristics of the male subjects and their partners during intervention.

Table I

Basic characteristics of the male subjects and their partners during intervention.

CharacteristicsValue
Male age, years34.9±2.8
Female age, years30.5±2.7
Normal spermatozoa, %11 (3–21)a
Oocytes, n25±8
Mature oocytes, n16±6
Fertilized oocytes, n12 (9–17)a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-etm-07-04-1000'] } Normal distribution values are listed as mean ± SD.

a Non-normal distribution values are listed as median (lower quartile-upper quartile).

Table II

Characteristics and the outcome of fertilization in patients with mildly and heavily defective spermatozoa.

Table II

Characteristics and the outcome of fertilization in patients with mildly and heavily defective spermatozoa.

MorphologyHeavily defective (≤1% normal spermatozoa)Mildly defective (>1% normal spermatozoa)P-value
Age, years35.3±3.134.8±2.70.339
Oocytes, n26±724±80.271
Mature oocytes, n15±616±60.192
Fertilized oocytes, n10 (9–13)a13 (9–17)a0.038
Pregnancy rates, present/absent23/1469/680.266
Delivery, present/absent22/1561/760.138

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-etm-07-04-1000'] } Values with normal distribution are listed as mean ± SD.

a Non-normal distribution values are listed as median (lower quartile-upper quartile).

The present study indicates that there was a significant difference in fertilization rates between the group of males with heavily impaired sperm morphology and those with mildly impaired sperm morphology. The result of a successful treatment was pregnancy and the birth of a healthy child. Statistical evaluation showed no significant difference between the two groups in this respect (Fig. 1).

Discussion

The prospects of producing biological offspring, in couples who previously had no likelihood of doing so, have considerably increased since the ICSI method was introduced in 1992 (first gravidity and delivery of a child following ICSI applied in a female). Following the first successful pregnancy and birth of a healthy child using the ICSI method, the procedure began to be widely used to assist fertilization, particularly in couples affected by male infertility (6). Gradual improvement of procedures in the evaluation of spermatozoa and micromanipulation techniques has opened new horizons for the successful assistance of reproduction in cases of male infertility. Compared with the conventional method of IVF, ICSI yields higher fertilization rates, as well as higher counts of cleaved embryos (16). One of the main differences between conventional IVF and the ICSI method is the ability to select just one sperm and insert it mechanically into the egg cytoplasm (17). Studies by Aytoz et al and Palermo et al found no significant difference between the pregnancy rates for normal and abnormal ejaculates using the ICSI method (18,19), consistent with the results of the present study. The method of selecting a suitable sperm markedly increased the count of fertilized oocytes in IVF/ICSI treatment and provided a general solution for the problem of heavy teratospermia in males who had no likelihood of achieving a successful treatment result. Therefore, the requirements for sperm donors have been markedly reduced.

The correlation between morphology and the low success of conventional IVF treatment has been clearly ascertained (20,21). The normal morphology of sperm is important for binding and penetration through the zona pellucida. Injection of one sperm through the zona pellucida and oolemma into the egg cytoplasm facilitates penetration of the egg, even for sperm previously incapable of overcoming these barriers during normal IVF fertilization. A range of studies have indicated that when using the ICSI method, the high percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm in the ejaculate has no essential effect on the outcome of fertilization, transfer of high-quality embryos and gravidity (10,2225). A study by De Vos showed a lower fertilization rate of oocytes for patients with abnormal spermatozoa but a comparable quality of embryos. Lower implantation and clinical gravidity rates for abnormal sperm were also observed (26). The present study using ICSI observed that lower fertilization rates were obtained in males with heavy teratospermia; however, this did not affect subsequent implantation, clinical gravidity and delivery of a healthy child. Fishel et al (27) conducted a study to compare IVF and ICSI methods using partner sperm and at the same time using donor sperm for IVF in couples with unexplained infertility. The highest fertilization incidence was observed in ICSI with the partner sperm. The conclusion of the study was that ICSI is an effective method of achieving fertilization in higher counts of oocytes, maximizing the number of embryos and minimizing the risk of fertilization failure in the treatment of infertility.

The results of the present study indicate that fertilization of oocytes is less effective in patients with poor morphological quality of sperm cells, compared with the effectiveness in patients with mildly impaired morphology. However, pregnancy and reproduction rates were independent of sperm morphology when ICSI was used. These results are in concordance with previously published studies. Microscopic selection of a sperm with ‘normal’ morphology during the ICSI procedure achieves excellent results, even in heavy teratospermias (28). Following introduction of the ICSI method, 2,000 children conceived using this method have been born; these individuals have not exhibited a higher incidence of malformations compared with those in children born following conventional IVF or in the normal population (29). However, this conclusion does not correspond with later results published by Hansen et al and Bonduelle et al (30,31) or with a subsequent study by Davies et al (32). Hansen et al observed that the incidence of inborn developmental defects diagnosed in the first year of life in children conceived with ICSI was double that in children conceived naturally (30). Factors that may increase the risk include the relatively high age of infertile couples, causes of infertility and the effect of drugs used to induce ovulation or to maintain gravidity in the initial stages of embryonic development, as well as factors connected with methods of assisted reproduction, freezing and unfreezing of embryos, late fertilization of oocytes and polyspermy. In the aforementioned study, a higher incidence of cardiovascular, urogenital, chromosomal and musculoskeletal defects was recorded when the ICSI method was used in assisted reproduction. Following the adjustment for parental risk factors, the incidence of developmental defects was not significantly higher in IVF, while the risk of ICSI-associated defects remained significantly higher following adjustment. An analysis of perinatal results from singleton pregnancies identified significant differences in the gestation age, birth weight, body length, head circumference and Apgar score in children conceived using ICSI when compared those in children born following spontaneous pregnancies (33). The international study by Bonduelle et al focused on children born following ICSI and their subsequent 5-year development (31). During these five years, these children showed a greater probability of requiring physiotherapy and speech therapy and showed a higher susceptibility to respiratory, dermatological or gastrointestinal infections, resulting in a higher need for various types of surgery. The extensive observational study by Davies et al (32) corroborated the conclusions of the two aforementioned studies (30,31) with regard to the increased risk of defects in newly born children conceived through assisted reproduction compared with the risk in children from spontaneous conception. The study by Davies et al is more comprehensive and includes 6,163 children conceived through assisted reproduction and evaluated until the age of five years. The increased risk of inborn IVF-associated defects is not significant following adjustment for parental risk factors, while in the ICSI method the higher risk persists. Notably, results from a comparison between fresh and frozen embryos used in IVF and ICSI cycles indicate that embryos transferred following thawing in the two methods did not show a higher incidence of developmental defects following birth than infants from natural conception. These results may be explained by the theory that embryos are unlikely to survive the demanding process of freezing and unfreezing unless they are of high quality (34). The process of mechanical injection of a selected sperm into the egg cytoplasm in ICSI avoids all natural barriers of spontaneous fertilization. As shown in the study by Fishel et al (27), in conventional IVF using high concentrations of donor sperm, when there is no intervention in the process of sperm penetration into the egg, the fertilization rate was significantly lower than that in the ICSI method with partner sperm, despite the partner sperm not exhibiting the high quality of the donor sperm.

The present study ended at the delivery of a full-term infant. Developmental defects of the fetuses were not observed, which may have been due to the low age of the females included in the study (30.5±2.7 years). Data concerning the subsequent development of the children are not available. Although the ICSI method is often the only option for gravidity and delivery of biological offspring, certain studies indicate that ISCI almost doubles the risk of inborn developmental defects in children (30,32). For males with oligoasthenoteratospermia, ICSI treatment is often the only potentially successful method of producing biological offspring. Despite infertile parents having a number of age-associated negative factors that may increase the risk of developmental defects in the fetus, medication and ICSI remain the most efficient method for males with heavy teratospermia to achieve pregnancy and the birth of a child, as shown in the present study. The development of a new technique of continual monitoring in the cultivation of embryos may provide an improved method for the selection of the embryos that are most suitable for transfer, which may subsequently decrease the incidence of fetal developmental defects (35).

References

1 

Parinaud J, Mieusset R, Vieitez G, Labal B and Richoilley G: Influence of sperm parameters on embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 60:888–892. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Braude P, Bolton V and Moore S: Human gene expression first occurs between the four-and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 332:459–461. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Tesarik J, Greco E and Mendoza C: Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 19:611–615. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Tesarik J: Paternal effects on cell division in the human preimplantation embryo. Reprod Biomed Online. 10:370–375. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Cohen-Bacrie P: Sperm quality and selection. J Gynecol Obstet Bio Reprod (Paris). 37(Suppl 1): S4–S8. 2008.(In French).

6 

Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P and Van Steirteghem AC: Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 340:17–18. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Lui J, Staessen C, Smitz J, Wisanto A and Devroey P: High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 8:1061–1066. 1993.

8 

Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Sattar MA and Amin YM: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization for sibling oocytes in cases of unexplained infertility and borderline semen. J Assist Reprod Genet. 13:38–42. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI and Amin YM: The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the treatment of patients with borderline semen. Hum Reprod. 10:2829–2830. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Camus M, Derde MC, Devroey P and Van Steirteghem AC: The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 10:1123–1129. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Cohen J, Alikani M, Munné S and Palermo G: Micromanipulation in clinical managment of fertility disorders. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 12:151–168. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Riedel HH, Hübner F, Ensslen SC, Bieniek KW and Grillo M: Minimal andrological requirements for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 4(8 Suppl): 73–77. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Enginsu ME, Dumoulin JC, Pieters MH, Evers JL and Geraedts JP: Predictive value of morphologically normal sperm concentration in the medium for in-vitro fertilization. Int J Androl. 16:113–120. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Ferreira R, Baruffi RL and Franco Júnior JG: Embryo selection by the first cleavage parameter between 25 and 27 hours after ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 18:209–212. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Gardner DK and Lane M: Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update. 3:367–382. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lucas H, Lammers J, Pfeffer J, Aknin I, Carré-Pigeon F, Jafou N, Paulus JM and Sifer C: Conventional IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes: a French experience analysis for BLEFCO. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 38:515–520. 2010.(In French).

17 

Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A and Sakkas D: Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence? Hum Reprod. 13:1632–1637. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Aytoz A, Camus M, Tournaye H, Bonduelle M, Van Steirteghem A and Devroey P: Outcome of pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and the effect of sperm origin and quality on this outcome. Fertil Steril. 70:500–505. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Palermo GD, Schlegel PN, Hariprashad JJ, Ergün B, Mielnik A, Zaninovic N, Veeck LL and Rosenwaks Z: Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 14:741–748. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Coetzee K, Kruge TF and Lombard CJ: Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Hum Reprod Update. 4:73–82. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Duran EH, Gürgan T, Günalp S, Enginsu ME, Yarali H and Ayhan A: A logistic regression model including DNA status and morphology of spermatozoa for prediction of fertilization in vitro. Hum Reprod. 13:1235–1239. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Amin YM and Ramzi AM: The effect of sperm parameters on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 64:982–986. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Küpker W, Schulze W and Diedrich K: Ultrastructure of gametes and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the significance of sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 13(Suppl 1): 99–106. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Lundin K, Söderlund B and Hamberger L: The relationship between sperm morphology and rates of fertilization, pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in an in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplazmic sperm injection programme. Hum Reprod. 12:2676–2681. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Svalander P, Jakobsson AH, Forsberg AS, Bengtsson AC and Wikland M: The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is unrelated to ‘strict criteria’ sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 11:1019–1022. 1996.

26 

De Vos A: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Hum Reprod. 15(Suppl 4): 59–64. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Fishel S, Aslam I, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Timson J, Jacobson M, Gobetz L, Green S, Campbell A and Lisi R: Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? Hum Reprod. 15:1278–1283. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

French DB, Sabanegh ES Jr, Goldfarb J and Desai N: Does severe teratozoospermia affect blastocyst formation, live birth rate, and other clinical outcome parameters in ICSI cycles? Fertil Steril. 93:1097–1103. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Bonduelle M, Camus M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Tournaye H, Van Assche E, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Liebaers I and Van Steirteghem A: Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children. Hum Reprod. 14(Suppl 1): 243–264. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C and Webb S: The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. New Engl J Med. 346:725–730. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Bonduelle M, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, Tarlatzis BC, Peters C, Henriet S, Mau C, Victorin-Cederquist A, Van Steirteghem A, Balaska A, Emberson JR and Sutcliffe AG: A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 20:413–419. 2005.

32 

Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson DK, Van Essen P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA and Chan A: Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. New Engl J Med. 366:1803–1813. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Katalinic A, Rösch C and Ludwig M; German ICSI Follow-Up Study Group. Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 81:1604–1616. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Wennerholm UB, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C, Aittomäki K, Hazekamp J, Nygren KG, Selbing A and Loft A: Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data. Hum Reprod. 24:2158–2172. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Kirkegaard K, Agerholm IE and Ingerslev HJ: Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod. 27:1277–1285. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

2014-April
Volume 7 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Blahová E, Máchal J, Máchal L, Milaković I and Hanuláková Š: Eliminating the effect of pathomorphologically formed sperm on resulting gravidity using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection method. Exp Ther Med 7: 1000-1004, 2014.
APA
Blahová, E., Máchal, J., Máchal, L., Milaković, I., & Hanuláková, Š. (2014). Eliminating the effect of pathomorphologically formed sperm on resulting gravidity using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection method. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 7, 1000-1004. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1522
MLA
Blahová, E., Máchal, J., Máchal, L., Milaković, I., Hanuláková, Š."Eliminating the effect of pathomorphologically formed sperm on resulting gravidity using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection method". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 7.4 (2014): 1000-1004.
Chicago
Blahová, E., Máchal, J., Máchal, L., Milaković, I., Hanuláková, Š."Eliminating the effect of pathomorphologically formed sperm on resulting gravidity using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection method". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 7, no. 4 (2014): 1000-1004. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1522