Combination treatment of captopril and prazosin to treat patients with gestational hypertension
- Authors:
- Published online on: August 13, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6604
- Pages: 3694-3702
Abstract
Introduction
Gestational hypertension is a disease that occurs during pregnancy and leads to symptoms including hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia and chronic hypertension (1,2). This disease adversely affects maternal and fetal health (3). Gestational hypertension is one of the leading causes of maternal, fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality (4,5). A previous report has suggested that the incidence rate of gestational hypertension is 7–12% in China, which is higher than the worldwide average (3.2–5.0%) (6). It has been demonstrated that clinically assisted reproductive technology treatment may increase the incidence of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (7). In addition, there are a number of factors that induce gestational hypertension and have been identified to serve a role in the etiology of these hypertensive disorders, including work stress, depression and anxiety (8,9). Furthermore, reports have indicated that vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor serve a crucial role in the process of gestational hypertension and may be potential targets for the treatment of patients with gestational hypertension in the clinic (10–12).
Antihypertensive drugs are typically used in clinical treatment for remission of patients with hypertension during the gestation period (13). Notably, the mechanisms of formation of gestational arterial hypertension for women during pregnancy have previously been investigated and results have indicated that vasodilation-converting enzyme contributes to the progression of gestational hypertension (14). Therefore, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor was investigated and the efficacy for hypertension in the clinic has been studied. Tovar-Rodriguez et al (12) have previously investigated a combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a diuretic that was highly effective in hypertension. Furthermore, the influence of the treatment of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on baroreflex sensitivity and flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery has also been demonstrated previously in essential hypertension (15). Captopril is an antihypertensive agent that targets angiotensin converting enzyme for the treatment of gestational hypertension (16). In the present study, the efficacy of captopril for the treatment of gestational hypertension, compared with prazosin, was investigated.
Prazosin is an α-adrenergic receptor inhibitor, which is used for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure (17). It has previously been revealed that a higher expression of α-adrenergic receptor is associated with the aggravation of gestational hypertension and α-adrenergic receptor blockers are beneficial for patients with hypertension (18). The present study further analyzed the therapeutic effects of prazosin on patients with gestational hypertension compared with captopril. Although the effects of prazosin on patients with diabetic nephropathy may induce positive α-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies, the efficacy of prazosin is evident on the improvement of gestational hypertension (19). Furthermore, it was observed that prazosin as an α-adrenergic receptor blocker, significantly reduced hypertension, heart failure and symptoms induced by gestational hypertension.
The aim of the present clinical study was to evaluate the combined treatment of captopril and prazosin for patients with gestational hypertension in a relatively large sample of pregnant outpatients (n=324) who had undergone gestational hypertension. The present study also investigated the potential molecular mechanism of captopril and prazosin in the processes of gestational hypertension. The results indicate that combination treatment with captopril and prazosin is more efficient for gestational hypertension than treatment with either captopril or prazosin. These clinical outcomes indicate that a therapeutic regimen of captopril and prazosin may be a potential therapeutic option for patients with gestational hypertension.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The current phase-II study (approval no. HMCH20090236-A4) was performed between February 2009 and August 2011 in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for Haidian Maternal and Child Healthcare. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Haidian Maternal and Child Health Care Center (Beijing, China). All patients were required to review trial protocols and amendments and to provide written informed consent.
Patients
A total of 324 patients with gestational hypertension (aged 22–42 years old) were randomly divided into four groups (Captopril, n=92; Prazosin, n=88; Combination, n=94; Placebo, n=50) and double-blind trails were conducted once daily in the Haidian Maternal and Child Healthcare unit. Patients were recruited between February 2009 and August 2011. A detailed description of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, allocation method and other details were provided in previously published studies (20,21). All patients were divided into four groups following the principle of random double-blind and control experiments. Patients with gestational hypertension received treatment with captopril (n=92) and prazosin (n=88), combination therapy of captopril and prazosin (n=94) or placebo (n=50). Patients with gestational hypertension received captopril (0.5 mg/kg, n=5; 1.0 mg/kg, n=5; 1.5 mg/kg, n=6; 2.0 mg/kg, n=6; 2.5 mg/kg, n=10; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), prazosin (0.02 mg/kg, n=5; 0.06 mg/kg, n=5; 0.10 mg/kg, n=7; 0.14 mg/kg, n=8; 0.18 mg/kg, n=7; Sigma-Aldrich), combined treatment (Captopril: 0.06 mg/kg and prazosin, 1.0 mg/kg) or a placebo (starch; Sigma-Aldrich; 1.0 mg/kg) that were administered orally. Patient trials were performed in a comfortable room.
Study design
The present double-blind study was performed in three phases: i) The baseline phase (consisting of 1-week of dose-titration treatment); ii) the double-blind treatment phase (consisting of 2-week dose-titration treatment); and iii) the 2-week post-treatment phase for patients with gestational hypertension who volunteered to continue to complete the study. A total of 39 patients ceased participation between phases II and III due to adverse side effects, including headache, angioedema, rash, pruritus, amblygeustia, palpitation, fever and tachycardia. Patients with gestational hypertension were randomized to undergo the double-blind treatment with captopril, prazosin, combined treatment or placebo, which were administered once daily. Patients with gestational hypertension continued to receive treatment with 0.06 mg/kg captopril, 1.0 mg/kg prazosin, combined therapy (Captopril: 0.06 mg/kg and Prazosin, 1.0 mg/kg) or placebo to achieve the final investigation throughout the post-treatment phase.
ELISA
Blood samples were collected from patients following 4-weeks treatment. Serum was separated using centrifugation at 6,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min. Commercial ELISA kits were used to measure plasma concentration levels of vasodilation-converting enzyme using a BACE1 ELISA kit (cat. no. MA1-744; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and an α-adrenergic receptor ELISA kit (cat. no. PA5-32660; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in patients with gestational hypertension, following the manufacturer's protocol. Final results were recorded at 450 nm on an ELISA plate reader.
Activity of angiotensin vasodilation-converting enzyme
Activity of vasodilation-converting enzyme was analyzed in patients following treatment. The activity of vasodilation-converting enzyme was conducted according to a previous report (22). The serum activity of angiotensin converting enzyme was determined using the spectrophotometric method using the synthetic substrate Hip-Gly-Gly (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) (23).
Outcome measures
An automated sphygmomanometer was used to assess the function of patients with gestational hypertension. The artery-to-vein ratio was used to analyze the efficacy of captopril, prazosin and combination treatment for patients with gestational hypertension. Clinical gestational hypertension parameters were evaluated as described in a previous study (24). The data of gestational hypertension was recorded and the degree of hypertension was calculated.
Efficacy and safety assessments
Efficacy assessments, including the median percentage reduction scores and response rate were analyzed in patients with gestational hypertension from the baseline and double-blind phases in the presence of each group's respective treatment. In addition, overall safety and pharmacokinetic analysis were conducted according to previous clinical studies (25,26). Furthermore, at least one safety assessment of the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events was conducted in all randomized patients following the administration of treatment. A dose-response analysis was conducted when the last dose of drugs was administered.
Evaluation of toxicity
The toxicities of captopril and prazosin were assessed using the National Gestational Hypertension Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (27). A biochemical profile measurement of blood pressure and urinalysis were performed every 2 days during gestational hypertension treatment periods. Furthermore, electrocardiograms and biochemical detection were performed every 3 days. Toxicity was defined as any of the drug-related toxicities defined in a previous study (28).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean, unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance of differences between mean values was assessed by Student's t-test for unpaired data. Comparisons of data between multiple groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by a post-hoc Turkey honest significant difference test. Continuous variables are presented as the mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). Treatment effect is presented as median reduction in knee osteoarthritis over the treatment period. Robust nonparametric Hodges-Lehmann estimates of median drugs treatment effects and 95% CI are provided. Responder rates and treatment-emergent adverse events were analyzed by χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 324 patients participated in the present clinical investigation to analyze the efficacy of captopril and prazosin in the treatment of gestational hypertension. The mean age of patients with gestational hypertension was 33.6±9.8 years old. The characteristics of patients with gestational hypertension are summarized in Table I. In addition, it was revealed that the percentage of patients with gestational hypertension who are ≥35 years old was significantly higher than those <35 years old (Fig. 1). Furthermore, incidence rate of coronary heart disease induced by gestational hypertension was significantly higher in patients aged >35 years old (Fig. 2). A total of 285 patients continued to complete the double-blind treatment period and the post-treatment phase.
Duration of treatment, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of captopril and prazosin
To analyze the optimal dose of captopril and prazosin in patients with gestational hypertension, the duration of treatment, DLT and MTD of captopril and prazosin were identified. The duration of treatment with captopril and prazosin was 4 weeks in patients with gestational hypertension. The dosing cohorts were 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mg/kg for captopril and 0.02, 0.06, 0.10, 0.14 and 0.18 mg/kg for prazosin. The doses of 1.5 and 2.0 mg/kg were identified as the MTD and DLT of captopril, respectively. In addition, 0.10 and 0.14 mg/kg of prazosin were identified as the MTD and DLT of prazosin, respectively. MTD and DLT were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0) of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (29). It was observed that the lowest-dose cohorts of antihypertensive agents presented the lowest number of captopril or prazosin dose reductions. Common treatment-emergent adverse events of captopril were headache, angioedema, rash, pruritus, amblygeustia, palpitation, fever and tachycardia (Table II). The common treatment-emergent adverse events of prazosin were palpitation, orthostatic hypotension, nausea, tinnitus, vomiting, sleepiness and diarrhea (Table III). Notably, the majority of patients with gestational hypertension required a reduced drug dosage to combat cumulative toxicity following treatment with the MTD dose (data not shown). Therefore, patients were administered 1.0 mg/kg captopril and 0.06 mg/kg prazosin to complete the present study.
Treatment-emergent adverse events of comprehensive treatment of captopril and prazosin
The treatment-emergent adverse events of comprehensive treatment of captopril and prazosin were analyzed in patients with gestational hypertension. Patients with gestational hypertension in each group received at least one dose of their respective group's treatment and a post-baseline safety evaluation, which included analysis of toxic events. As depicted in Table IV, following the last dose of captopril and prazosin, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in single agent treatment and combination treatment were rash and palpitation (≥10% each). These side effects were catabolic and were resolved following termination of the treatment.
Table IV.Treatment-emergent adverse events for hypertension and proteinuria by common toxicity criteria grade. |
Efficacy of comprehensive treatment of captopril and prazosin for gestational hypertension
Following analysis of the treatment-emergent adverse events of comprehensive treatment of captopril and prazosin, the therapeutic effects of captopril and/or prazosin were examined on blood pressure, proteinuria, artery-to-vein ratio and edema for patients with gestational hypertension. As depicted in Fig. 3, it was observed that blood pressure was significantly improved in patients treated with captopril or prazosin compared with placebo. However, combination treatment of captopril and prazosin was significantly more effective compared with either captopril or prazosin alone. Similar results were also observed in proteinuria levels in patients with gestational hypertension, which recovered to healthy levels (80–120 mm Hg) in the captopril and/or prazosin groups, compared with placebo treatment (Fig. 4). In addition, it was revealed that the artery-to-vein ratio was significantly increased by the treatment of captopril or prazosin compared with placebo and combination treatment induced a significant increase compared with either single agent (Fig. 5). Furthermore, the edema stores of patients with gestational hypertension were significantly reduced following treatment with captopril or prazosin compared with placebo and combination treatment induced a significant decrease compared with either single agent (Fig. 6). Together, these clinical outcomes revealed that combination therapy with captopril and prazosin significantly ameliorated the clinical features of gestational hypertension.
Analysis of plasma concentration of vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor in patients with gestational hypertension
The expression and activity of vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor was subsequently detected in patients with gestational hypertension following treatment with captopril and/or prazosin. As demonstrated in Fig. 7, compared with the placebo group, the plasma concentration of vasodilation-converting enzyme was significantly downregulated following prazosin treatment. Treatment with captopril alone or combination treatment led to a significant decrease compared with prazosin treatment alone. It was observed that the activity of vasodilation-converting enzyme was also significantly inhibited in patients with gestational hypertension following treatment with captopril or combination treatment in comparison with both the placebo and prazosin groups (Fig. 8). In addition, it was revealed that the plasma concentration levels of α-adrenergic receptor in patients with gestational hypertension were downregulated following treatment with prazosin or combination treatment in comparison with both the placebo and captopril groups (Fig. 9). Together, these clinical outcomes indicate that expression levels of vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor may be downregulated by captopril and prazosin, respectively, which contribute to the recovery of gestational hypertension.
Pharmacodynamics analysis
After examining the efficacy of comprehensive treatment of captopril and prazosin, the pharmacodynamics of captopril and prazosin were analyzed in patients with gestational hypertension during the clinical therapeutic period. The plasma concentration levels of captopril and prazosin were analyzed in patients with gestational hypertension following treatment with captopril and/or prazosin. As depicted in Fig. 10, the plasma concentration levels of captopril peaked at 3 h post-treatment. In addition, the plasma concentration levels of prazosin reached a maximum 3–7.5 h following administration (Fig. 11). Furthermore, the maximum concentrations (Cmax) of captopril or prazosin were observed to increase linearly with increasing dosages (Figs. 12 and 13). The present study presented that the median terminal elimination half-time (t½) of captopril or prazosin ranged between 1 and 12 h at the indicated dose. Furthermore, there was no drug accumulation observed after patients received captopril or prazosin by observing the Cmax values. Together, these data indicate that captopril and prazosin exhibited efficient concentration and functional times.
Discussion
Previous studies have indicated that vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor serve a crucial role in the initiation and development of patients with gestational hypertension, which respectively target angiotensin and α-adrenergic receptor and subsequently lead to gestational hypertension (18,30). In the present study, the association among the plasma concentration levels of vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor and hypertension was investigated in patients with gestational hypertension. In addition, the efficacies of the antihypertensive drugs captopril and prazosin, which target vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor, respectively, have been examined in patients with gestational hypertension.
Following a 4-week baseline, patients with gestational hypertension were randomized to a double-blind treatment with captopril, prazosin, combined therapy or placebo once daily. Although previous results indicated that treatment with captopril or prazosin was able to regulate the plasma concentrations of vasodilation-converting enzyme and α-adrenergic receptor, respectively (19,31), to the best of our knowledge, the clinical outcomes of combined captopril and prazosin have not been investigated in previous studies. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the clinical application of combined treatment with captopril and prazosin. The safety, treatment-emergent adverse events, positive observations and pharmacodynamics of the comprehensive treatment of captopril and prazosin were also evaluated to make a comprehensive assessment for the therapeutic effects for patients with gestational hypertension. Treatment responses have assessed median percent reduction in hypertension that was improved with comprehensive treatment of captopril and prazosin compared to a single agent and placebo. Furthermore, the overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the presence of captopril and prazosin were rash and palpitation during the treatment of gestational hypertension, which is consistent with previous reports (32,33). The clinical data of the present study have demonstrated that captopril and prazosin are able to alleviate gestational hypertension and hypertension-related indictors.
Captopril is an inhibitor of vasodilation-converting enzyme that is used as a clinical oral drug for the treatment of hypertension in a number of countries. A number of previous studies have investigated the therapeutic effects of captopril on patients with gestational hypertension in clinical. Woodworth et al (29) have demonstrated the effect of long-term captopril therapy on patients with hypertension and diabetes determined by the biochemical parameters of intrarenal blood flow and renal function. In addition, Van Guilder et al (30) have indicated that comprehensive effects of low-dose oral spironolactone and captopril therapy present more benefits for spontaneous hypertension and heart failure. Furthermore, Reusz et al (31) have recently suggested the influence of captopril treatment on occupational activity of engine operators with hypertension. These outcomes indicate that captopril is an efficient drug for the treatment of hypertension in preclinical and clinical experiments. The outcomes also confirm the efficacy of captopril on gestational hypertension. Furthermore, the treatment-emergent adverse events and pharmacodynamics of Captopril were evaluated and studied to systematically analyze the drug metabolism during the treatment for patients with gestational hypertension. The outcomes indicate that captopril is a relatively efficient antihypertensive drug for the treatment of gestational hypertension.
Prazosin is an α-adrenergic receptor inhibitor that can significantly inhibit vasoconstriction by targeting the α-adrenergic receptor in the vascular endothelial cells. Previous studies have indicated that prazosin inhibits the activity of α-adrenergic receptor leading to the improvement of activity of vascular endothelial cells in patients with hypertension (34,35). In addition, Franklin et al (27) have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerance of prazosin in patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes. Furthermore, Joglekar and Nanivadekar (34) also compared the efficacies of oral therapy with combined enalapril, prazosin and hydrochlorothiazide in the acute treatment of severe hypertension in Nigerian patients. The present study investigated the efficacies of combined treatment of captopril and prazosin for the treatment of gestational hypertension and it was demonstrated that prazosin treatment also inhibits the serum concentration levels of α-adrenergic receptor in patients with gestational hypertension. These results of the present study revealed that captopril and prazosin used in combination had a higher efficacy than when the drugs were administered alone in patients being treated for gestational hypertension. Furthermore, pharmacodynamic analysis indicated that captopril and prazosin may be maintained at efficient concentrations in patients with gestational hypertension.
In conclusion, the present study investigated the clinical efficacy of combination treatment with captopril and prazosin in patients with gestational hypertension in a phase-II clinical study. Although previous studies have identified a number of drugs that exhibit direct effects on gestational hypertension, it is important to investigate the overall role of captopril and prazosin in affecting hypertension and hypertension-related indicators (36,37). The clinical outcomes presented that captopril and prazosin revealed novel options in gestational hypertension management and an increasing number of clinical reports demonstrate promising results. Of note, this clinical analysis indicates that pharmacokinetic interactions of captopril and prazosin are important determinants in optimizing therapy for gestational hypertension. Therefore, clinicians require monitoring the clinical responses and tolerability when patients undergo treatment with captopril and prazosin. Overall, the observations of the present study indicate that patients with gestational hypertension comprehensively treated with captopril and prazosin demonstrated beneficial effects on gestational hypertension.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The analyzed data sets generated during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
BH designed and performed experiments. XD, HI and JZ analyzed the data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The current phase-II study (approval no. HMCH20090236-A4) was performed between February 2009 and August 2011 in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for Haidian Maternal and Child Healthcare. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Haidian Maternal and Child Health Care Center (Beijing, China). All patients were required to review trial protocols and amendments and to provide written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Kennedy DA, Woodland C and Koren G: Lead exposure, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: A systematic review of cause and effect. J Obstet Gynaecol. 32:512–517. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang YH, Chen YP, Liang CC, Chang YL and Hsieh CC: Impetigo herpetiformis with gestational hypertension: A case report and literature review. Dermatology. 222:221–224. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu YC, Sun Y and Yang HX: Chronic hypertension superimposed on preeclampsia at 13 gestational weeks: A case report with review. Chin Med J (Engl). 125:2067–2069. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Schoenaker DA, Soedamah-Muthu SS and Mishra GD: The association between dietary factors and gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Med. 12:1572014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pengo MF, Rossi GP and Steier J: Obstructive sleep apnea, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: A review of the literature. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 20:588–594. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zainul Rashid MR, Lim JF, Nawawi NH, Luqman M, Zolkeplai MF, Rangkuty HS, Mohamad Nor NA, Tamil A, Shah SA, Tham SW and Schindler AE: A pilot study to determine whether progestogen supplementation using dydrogesterone during the first trimester will reduce the incidence of gestational hypertension in primigravidae. Gynecol Endocrinol. 30:217–220. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang YA, Chughtai AA, Farquhar CM, Pollock W, Lui K and Sullivan EA: Increased incidence of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia after assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 105:920–926.e922. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hua X, Zhang J, Guo Y, Shen M, Gaudet L, Janoudi G, Walker M and Wen SW: Effect of folic acid supplementation during pregnancy on gestational hypertension/preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens pregnancy. 35:447–460. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Basaran A, Basaran M, Topatan B and Martin JN Jr: Effect of chorionic villus sampling on the occurrence of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 17:65–72. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang C, Li J and Wang K: Clinical analysis of the therapeutic effect of patients with gestational hypertension combined with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrom. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 28:1521–1522. 2014.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI | |
Sakar MN, Atay AE, Demir S, Bakir VL, Demir B, Balsak D, Akay E, Ulusoy AI and Verit FF: Association of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene G894T polymorphism and serum nitric oxide levels in patients with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med. 28:1907–1911. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tovar-Rodriguez JM, Medel-Lagunes Idel C, Acosta-Altamirano G and Vargas-Hernandez VM: Clinic characteristics of patients with trophoblastic gestational disease complicate with hypertension. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 81:578–586. 2013.(In Spanish). PubMed/NCBI | |
Vasapollo B, Novelli GP, Gagliardi G, Tiralongo GM, Pisani I, Manfellotto D, Giannini L and Valensise H: Medical treatment of early-onset mild gestational hypertension reduces total peripheral vascular resistance and influences maternal and fetal complications. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 40:325–331. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Davidovich IM, Bloshchinskaia IA and Petrichko TA: Gestational arterial hypertension. Mechanisms of formation. Treatment with normodipin. Ter Arkh. 75:50–54. 2003.(In Russian). | |
Munakata M, Aihara A, Nunokawa T, Ito N, Imai Y, Ito S and Yoshinaga K: The influence of one-year treatment by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on baroreflex sensitivity and flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery in essential hypertension-comparison with calcium channel blockers. Clin Exp Hypertens. 25:169–181. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu Y and Zhu J: Quality of life of patients with mild hypertension treated with captopril: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 112:302–307. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Rudner S and Browne P: Case report: Management of secondary hypertension in a feline with the use of transdermal prazosin. Int J Pharm Compd. 14:488–491. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Iwatsubo K and Umemura S: Alpha adrenergic receptor blockers for patients with hypertension. Nihon Rinsho. 6:294–299. 2006.(In Japanese). | |
Zhao LS and Xu CY: Effect of prazosin on diabetic nephropathy patients with positive α1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies and refractory hypertension. Exp Ther Med. 9:177–182. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Hassanabadi H, Fathi M, Ghorbani E, Babaee M and Azma K: Knee osteoarthritis injection choices: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (A one-year randomized clinical trial). Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 8:1–8. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rodriguez-Merchan EC: Intraarticular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 1:5–8. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Goetz RM and Holtz J: Enhanced angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in aortae from hypertensive rats: Evidence for a causal link. Clin Sci (Lond). 97:165–174. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Paiva L, Lima E, Neto AI and Baptista J: Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity of fucus spiralis macroalgae and influence of the extracts storage temperature-A short report. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 131:503–507. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mattar MM, Morad MA, El Husseiny NM, Ali NH and El Demerdash DM: Correlation between JAK2 allele burden and pulmonary arterial hypertension and hematological parameters in philadelphia negative JAK2 positive myeloproliferative neoplasms. An egyptian experience. Ann Hematol. 95:1611–1616. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gobbi A, Lad D and Karnatzikos G: The effects of repeated intra-articular PRP injections on clinical outcomes of early osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 23:2170–2177. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Filardo G, Kon E, DI Matteo B, DI Marino A, Sessa A, Merli ML and Marcacci M: Leukocyte-poor PRP application for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Joints. 1:112–120. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Franklin HR, Simonetti GP, Dubbelman AC, ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Taal BG, Wigbout G, Mandjes IA, Dalesio OB and Aaronson NK: Toxicity grading systems. A comparison between the WHO scoring system and the common toxicity criteria when used for nausea and vomiting. Ann Oncol. 5:113–117. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boss DS, Glen H, Beijnen JH, Keesen M, Morrison R, Tait B, Copalu W, Mazur A, Wanders J, O'Brien JP, et al: A phase I study of E7080, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 106:1598–1604. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Woodworth T, Furst DE, Alten R, Bingham CO III, Yocum D, Sloan V, Tsuji W, Stevens R, Fries J, Witter J, et al: Standardizing assessment and reporting of adverse effects in rheumatology clinical trials II: The rheumatology common toxicity criteria v.2.0. J Rheumatol. 34:1401–1414. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Van Guilder GP, Pretorius M, Luther JM, Byrd JB, Hill K, Gainer JV and Brown NJ: Bradykinin type 2 receptor BE1 genotype influences bradykinin-dependent vasodilation during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Hypertension. 51:454–459. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reusz GS and Kis E, Cseprekál O, Szabó AJ and Kis E: Captopril-enhanced renal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pediatric hypertension. Pediatr Nephrol. 25:185–189. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hanon O, Giacomino A, Troy S, Bernaud C, Girerd X and Weber S: Efficacy of and tolerance to prolonged release prazosin in patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 49:390–396. 2000.(In French). PubMed/NCBI | |
Hall DR, Odendaal HJ, Steyn DW and Smith M: Nifedipine or prazosin as a second agent to control early severe hypertension in pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 107:759–765. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Joglekar SJ and Nanivadekar AS: A randomized, controlled, multicenter study to compare prazosin GITS with enalapril in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus. Bombay Hypertension Study Group. J Assoc Physicians India. 1:52–62. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Joglekar SJ, Jaguste V and Nanivadekar AS: Prazosin GITS vs atenolol in patients with hypertension and normal lipid profile: A randomized, controlled multicenter study. Hyderabad Hypertension Study Group. J Assoc Physicians India. 1:41–51. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Morishita S, Hagihara M, Itabashi M, Ishii Y, Yamamoto W, Numata A, Motohashi K, Matsumoto K, Fujisawa S and Nakajima H: Development of pulmonary arterial hypertension during oral dasatinib therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Rinsho Ketsueki. 57:999–1003. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Galappatthy P, Waniganayake YC, Sabeer MI, Wijethunga TJ, Galappatthy GK and Ekanayaka RA: Leg edema with (S)-amlodipine vs conventional amlodipine given in triple therapy for hypertension: A randomized double blind controlled clinical trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 16:1682016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |