Open Access

miR‑28‑3p inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promotes apoptosis by targeting ARF6

  • Authors:
    • Jiabin Zhang
    • Yi Yao
    • Huizhang Li
    • Shihua Ye
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 24, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10639
  • Article Number: 1205
  • Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Previous studies have reported that the expression levels of microRNA (miR)‑28‑3p are downregulated in prostate cancer (PCa) compared with those in adjacent normal tissues. However, to the best of our knowledge, the function and underlying mechanisms of miR‑28‑3p in PCa have not been reported. The present study aimed to explore the role of miR‑28‑3p and its mechanism in the development of PCa. In the present study, miR‑28‑3p and ADP‑ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) expression levels were analyzed using reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR (RT‑qPCR). Cell proliferation, colony formation, apoptosis, migration and invasion were determined using Cell Counting Kit‑8, colony forming, flow cytometry and Transwell assays, respectively. The association between miR‑28‑3p and ARF6 was investigated using a dual luciferase reporter assay. ARF6, Rac1, Erk1/2 and phosphorylated (p)‑Erk1/2 protein expression levels were analyzed using western blotting. The results of the present study revealed that miR‑28‑3p expression levels were downregulated, whereas ARF6 expression levels were upregulated in PCa cell lines (LNCaP, 22Rv‑1, PC‑3 and DU145) compared with those in the normal prostate line RWPE‑1. The overexpression of miR‑28‑3p promoted cell apoptosis, and inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion. However, the knockdown of miR‑28‑3p exerted the opposite results. The results of the dual luciferase reporter assays, RT‑qPCR and western blotting indicated that ARF6 was a target gene of miR‑28‑3p. Finally, rescue experiments demonstrated that ARF6 overexpression attenuated the effects of the miR‑28‑3p mimic by upregulating Rac1 and p‑Erk1/2 expression in PCa cells. In conclusion, these findings indicated that miR‑28‑3p may inhibit the biological ehaviors of PCa cells by targeting ARF6, and therefore may represent a novel therapeutic candidate for PCa.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality among men worldwide, with an estimated 1,276,000 new prostate cancer cases and 359,000 deaths in 2018(1). As PCa is an androgen-dependent cancer, where endocrine therapy (castration and antihormone therapy) is one of the main methods used to treat the disease (2). The majority of patients with PCa are initially responsive to androgen-deprivation therapy; however, this treatment not only increases the risk of dementia, but it may also induce PCa-related androgen receptor mutations (3,4), which renders PCa difficult to treat. At present, to the best of our knowledge, the pathogenesis of PCa remains poorly understood. An enhanced understanding of the mechanisms involved in the occurrence and development of PCa will be of significant value to the early diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of the disease (5).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs that target specific mRNA sequences to inhibit protein translation (6). It has been reported that miRNAs are involved throughout the entire tumorigenesis process, where they have been closely associated with tumor cell proliferation, differentiation, invasion and metastasis (7). It has also been extensively reported that the expression levels of miRNAs in human cancer tissues are dysregulated (8). In fact, miRNAs have been proposed as alternative biomarkers and therapeutic tools for PCa prognosis and diagnosis (9). For example, miR-15a and miR-16 have been reported to function as tumor suppressors in PCa by inhibiting cell proliferation and invasion (10). In another study, miR-449a induced PCa cell cycle arrest by targeting histone deacetylase 1(11). Furthermore, inhibitors of miR-346, miR-361-3p and miR-197 were found to significantly inhibit PCa migration and invasion (12).

Previously, Fuse et al (13) identified 56 downregulated miRNAs in PCa tissues in comparison to that in adjacent non-PCa tissues, including miR-28-3p. To the best of our knowledge, the role of miR-28-3p in PCa has not been reported. A previous study demonstrated that the knockdown of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) may exert an inhibitory effect on the hormone-independent PCa cell line, PC-3, and the molecular mechanisms associated with these changes were suggested to be due to the downregulation of phosphorylated (p)-Erk1/2 and Rac1 expression (14). In addition, the stable overexpression of the androgen driver tetraspanin 1 markedly promoted cell migration and upregulated the expression of ARF6(15). However, it remains unclear whether miRNAs can target ARF6 in PCa.

The present study aims to explore the role of miR-28-3p and its mechanism in the development of PCa. miR-28-3p and ARF6 expression was quantified in both PCa tissues and cell lines. Based on these previous findings, the role of miR-28-3p and ARF6 in relation to the biological behaviors of PCa cells was investigated.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and culture

Four human PCa cell lines (LNCaP, 22Rv-1, PC-3 and DU145) and normal prostate cells (RWPE-1) were purchased from The Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of The Chinese Academy of Sciences. PCa cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). RWPE-1 cells were cultured in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing bovine pituitary extract (50 µg/ml; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and epidermal growth factor (5 ng/ml, Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). All cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37˚C.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted using 0.5 ml NucleoZOL reagent (Gene Company, Ltd.) from LNCaP, 22Rv-1, PC-3, DU145 and RWPE-1 cells, according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Prime Script™ RT reagent kit (cat. no. DRR037A; Takara Bio, Inc.). The reverse transcription temperature protocol was as follows: 37˚C for 15 min and 85˚C for 5 sec. qPCR was subsequently performed using a SYBR Green Real-Time PCR Master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The following thermocycling conditions were used for qPCR: 50˚C for 2 min, initial denaturation at 95˚C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 30 sec, 55˚C for 1 min and 72˚C for 30 sec. The following primer sequences were used for qPCR: miR-28-3p forward, 5'-CGCGCACTAGATTGTGAGCT-3' and reverse, 5'-AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT-3'; U6 forward, 5'-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACATATACT-3' and reverse, 5'-ACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTC-3'; ARF6 forward, 5'-GCGGCATTACTACACTGGGA-3' and reverse, 5'-CCTGGATCTCGTGGGGTTTC-3'; and GAPDH forward, 5'-GTCAAGGCTGAGAACGGGAA-3' and reverse, 5'-AAATGAGCCCCAGCCTTCTC-3' miR-28-3p expression was normalized to U6 expression levels, whereas ARF6 expression was normalized to GAPDH expression levels. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCq method (16).

Cell transfection

The miR-28-3p mimic (5'-CACUAGAUUGUGAGCUCCUGGA-3'), mimic negative control (NC; 5'-UCUACUCUUUCUAGGAGGUUGUGA-3'), miR-28-3p inhibitor (5'-UCCAGGAGCUCACAAUCUAGUG-3') and inhibitor NC (5'-UCUACUCUUUCUAGGAGGUUGUGA-3') were obtained from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. The ARF6 gene was synthesized and then cloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). To construct the pcDNA-ARF6 recombinant plasmid. Transfection of the empty vector pcDNA3.1 was used as negative control (pcDNA). DU145 cells were seeded at a density of 1x105 cells/well in 24-well plates. Transfection of each oligonucleotide or plasmid into DU145 cells was performed using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 5 µl Lipofectamine 2000 was incubated in 250 µl serum-free RPMI-1640 medium for 5 min at 37˚C. An appropriate amount of miR-28-3p mimic (25 nM), miR-28-3p inhibitor (50 nM), mimic NC (25 nM), inhibitor NC (50 nM), pcDNA (2 µg) or pcDNA-ARF6 (2 µg) was added and incubated for a further 20 min at room temperature. Following the incubation, the final mixture was added to each well and incubated at 37˚C with cells for 48 h. Subsequently, cells were used for the follow-up experiments.

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

Cell proliferation was analyzed using CCK-8 reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1x103 cells/well and cultured for 0, 24, 48, 72 or 96 h. Following the incubation, 10 µl CCK-8 solution was added to each well and further incubated for 2 h at 37˚C. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using a microplate reader.

Colony formation assay

Cell proliferation was also analyzed using a colony forming assay. Briefly, transfected cells in the logarithmic growth phase were collected, and 800 cells/well were plated into a 6-well plate and incubated at 37˚C. The state of the cells was observed until the number of cells in the majority of the individual colonies in the well was ≥50. Following the incubation, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4˚C for 1 h and stained with clean, impurity-free 0.1% crystal violet dye solution for a further 2 min at room temperature. Images of colonies were captured with a digital camera and counted.

Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis

Flow cytometry was performed to detect cell apoptosis using an Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate apoptosis measurement kit (BD Biosciences). Briefly, following transfection, the cells (1x106/m) were washed twice with cold PBS, and stained with 5 µl Annexin V and 10 µl PI for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. Apoptotic cells were analyzed using a BD FACSVerse™ flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed with the FlowJo software Version 10 (FlowJo LLC). The percentage of early and late apoptotic cells was calculated.

Transwell assays

The migratory and invasive abilities of cells were analyzed using Transwell assays. For the migration assays, cells were seeded into 24-well plates, before 1x105 cells suspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium were added to the upper chambers of Transwell plates (Corning, Inc.), whilst RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 20% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After 24 h of incubation at 37˚C, the cells remaining in the upper chamber were removed with a cotton swab, while cells that had migrated to the lower chamber were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 0.5 h at room temperature and stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 15 min at room temperature. Migratory cells from each group were visualized and counted in three randomly selected fields of view using a light microscope (magnification, x400; Olympus Corporation). The percentage migrated area was calculated with Image Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).

For the cell invasion assays, the upper chambers of the 24-well Transwell plates were precoated with standard Matrigel (BD Biosciences) diluted 1:8 in serum-free medium, and were air-dried at 4˚C and thoroughly solidified at 37˚C for 30 min. Subsequently, 100 µl cells from each group suspended in serum-free medium were plated at a density of 1x105 cells/ml into the upper chambers of. The remaining steps are consistent with those aforementioned for the migration assay.

Vector construction and dual luciferase reporter assay

To determine potential target genes of miR-28-3p, TargetScan 7.2 (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) was used. According to the sequence of the ARF6 3'-untranslated region (UTR) found in GenBank (accession no. NM_001663.4), primers were designed and ARF6 was amplified (The template cDNA was obtained from 293T cells) using PrimerSTAR® Max DNA Polymerase (cat. no. R045A; Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and cloned into the psiCHECK™-2 dual luciferase reporter vector (Promega Corporation) to construct a wild-type (WT) dual-luciferase recombinant plasmid (ARF6-WT). The following primer sequences were used for amplified: forward, 5'-CCTCGAGTGACTTCCAGCAGATGGGATG-3' and reverse, 5'-ATTTGCGGCCGCACATACTGAGGTGCAACTGGA-3'. The following thermocycling conditions were used for qPCR: Initial denaturation at 95˚C for 5 min, denaturation at 95˚C for 30 sec, followed by 32 cycles of 55˚C for 30 sec, 72˚C for 45 s and 72˚C for 10 sec. ARF6-Mut were synthesized by Universal biological systems (Anhui) Co., Ltd. (https://www.generalbiol.com/) by mutating the specific binding sequence for miR-28-3p in the 3'-UTR of ARF6. 293T cells purchased from The Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of The Chinese Academy of Sciences and were cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37˚C under 5% CO2. 293T cells (1x106) were cultured in 12-well plates for 24 h at 37˚C. Subsequently, 20 µM miR-28-3p mimic or miR-28-3p inhibitor and 50 ng ARF6-WT or -Mut reporter plasmids were transfected into the cells using Lipofectamine® 2000 at 37˚C. Cells transfected with 20 µM mimic NC or inhibitor NC and 50 ng ARF6-WT or -Mut reporter plasmids were used as control groups. A total of 48 h post-transfection, a Dual Luciferase Reporter assay system (Promega Corporation) was used to measure the relative luciferase activity. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.

Western blotting

Total protein was extracted from collected cells in RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) containing 1 mM PMSF (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and total protein concentration was quantified using a BCA assay (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). In total, 20 µg proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and subsequently transferred onto a PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore), which was blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) diluted in TBS-0.1% Tween-20 buffer at room temperature for 2 h. The membranes were then incubated with the following primary antibodies (all 1:1,000) at 4˚C overnight: Anti-ARF6 (Abcam; cat. no. ab226389), anti-Rac1 (Abcam; cat. no. ab155938), anti-Bcl-2 (Abcam; cat. no. ab194583), anti-Bax (Abcam; cat. no. ab263897), anti-Erk1/2 (Abcam; cat. no. ab17942), anti-p-ERK1/2 (Abcam; cat. no. ab214362) and anti-β-actin (Abcam; cat. no. ab213262). Following the primary antibody incubation, the membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with a HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam; cat. no. ab6721; 1:5,000) at room temperature for 2 h. Protein bands were visualized using SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.; cat. no. 34080) on a VersaDoc™ gel imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Densitometric analysis was performed using the Image J software (version 1.51; National Institutes of Health).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) and data are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical differences between groups were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All experiments were repeated three times.

Results

Expression levels of miR-28-3p and ARF6 in human PCa cell lines

To investigate the role of miR-28-3p and ARF6 in human PCa cell lines, miR-28-3p and ARF6 expression levels were analyzed in four PCa cell lines (LNCaP, 22Rv-1, PC-3 and DU145). Compared with those detected in RWPE-1 cells, the expression levels of miR-28-3p were significantly downregulated in the four PCa cell lines (Fig. 1A), and DU145 cells exhibited the greatest decrease in miR-28-3p expression. Conversely, the mRNA expression levels of ARF6 were significantly upregulated in the four PCa cell lines compared with those in RWPE-1 cells (Fig. 1B), and DU145 cells had the highest expression levels of ARF6. Therefore, DU145 cells were selected for use in subsequent experiments, including the establishment of miR-28-3p mimic-/inhibitor-transfected cells.

Transfection efficiency of miR-28-3p inhibitor and mimic in DU145 cells

To determine the role of miR-28-3p in PCa cells, the human PCa cell line, DU145, was transfected with the miR-28-3p mimic, which is a chemically synthesized double-stranded oligonucleotide that mimics the endogenous mature function of miR-28-3p, or a miR-28-3p inhibitor, which is a modified antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits miR-28-3p function. Cells transfected with the mimic NC or inhibitor NC were used as controls. A total of 48 h post-transfection, the expression levels of miR-28-3p were determined using RT-qPCR. The results revealed that transfection with the miR-28-3p mimic upregulated the expression levels of miR-28-3p by ~30-fold, whereas transfection with the miR-28-3p inhibitor downregulated the expression of miR-28-3p in DU145 cells compared with those in cells transfected with the respective NCs (Fig. 2). These results indicated that the miR-28-3p mimic and inhibitor were able to effectively regulate miR-28-3p expression levels in DU145 cells.

Effect of miR-28-3p on the proliferation of DU145 cells

The effects of miR-28-3p on the proliferation of DU145 cells were determined using a CCK-8 assay. The results demonstrated that the proliferation of miR-28-3p mimic-transfected cells was significantly decreased compared with the mimic NC-transfected cells (Fig. 3A). Conversely, the knockdown of miR-28-3p expression in cells significantly increased the proliferation compared with the inhibitor NC-transfected cells (Fig. 3A). To further analyze cell proliferation, colony formation experiments were performed. The results revealed that the number of colonies was significantly decreased in the miR-28-3p mimic group compared with that in the mimic NC group (Fig. 3B and C). Compared with the inhibitor NC group, the number of colonies was significantly increased in the miR-28-3p inhibitor group.

Effect of miR-28-3p on the apoptosis of DU145 cells

A total of 48 h post-transfection with the miR-28-3p mimic or inhibitor, cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. The results revealed that the apoptotic rate was significantly increased in the miR-28-3p mimic group compared with that in the mimic NC group (Fig. 4A). Compared with the inhibitor NC group, the apoptotic rate was significantly decreased in the miR-28-3p inhibitor group. In addition, the ratio of Bcl-2/Bax was detected by western blotting. The results revealed that miR-28-3p overexpression reduced the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, which may aggravate apoptosis, whereas inhibition of miR-28-3p expression upregulated the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, which could inhibit apoptosis (Fig. 4B).

Effect of miR-28-3p on the migration and invasion of DU145 cells

Whether miR-28-3p regulated human PCa cell migration and invasion was investigated in the PCa cell line, DU145, following transfection with the miR-28-3p mimic, miR-28-3p inhibitor, mimic NC or inhibitor NC. The results revealed that the migratory and invasive abilities of DU145 cells were significantly decreased in the miR-28-3p mimic group compared with those in the mimic NC group (Fig. 5). By contrast, the migration and invasion were significantly increased in the miR-28-3p inhibitor group compared with those in the inhibitor NC group (Fig. 5). These results indicated that miR-28-3p may be a negative regulator of PCa migration and invasion.

ARF6 is a direct target gene of miR-28-3p

TargetScan was used to predict the potential gene target of miR-28-3p. The 3'-UTR of ARF6 was identified to contain a complementary site for the seed region of miR-28-3p (Fig. 6A). To further validate whether miR-28-3p targeted ARF6, a dual luciferase reporter assay was used to determine the relationship between miR-28-3p and ARF6 in the 293T cell line. As illustrated in Fig. 6A, transfection with the miR-28-3p mimic significantly decreased the relative luciferase activity of the ARF6-WT 3'-UTR compared with that in cells following the transfection of mimic NC. Transfection with the miR-28-3p inhibitor significantly increased the relative luciferase activity of the ARF6-WT 3'-UTR compared with that in cells after the transfection of inhibitor NC. Furthermore, these effect was abolished when the nucleotides in the seed binding site of the ARF6 3'-UTR were mutated. Moreover, the effect of miR-28-3p on the expression levels of ARF6 was analyzed using RT-qPCR and western blotting. The results revealed that overexpression of miR-28-3p significantly downregulated the mRNA expression levels of ARF6 in DU145 cells compared with those in the mimic NC-transfected cells (Fig. 6B). Conversely, knockdown of miR-28-3p significantly upregulated the mRNA expression levels of ARF6 compared with those in the inhibitor NC-transfected cells (Fig. 6B). In addition, overexpression of miR-28-3p significantly downregulated the protein expression levels of ARF6 in DU145 cells compared with those in the mimic NC-transfected cells, whereas knockdown of miR-28-3p significantly upregulated the protein expression levels of ARF6 compared with those in the inhibitor NC-transfected cells (Fig. 6C). These results suggested that ARF6 may be a direct target gene of miR-28-3p.

Effect of ARF6 and miR-28-3p overexpression on DU145 cells

The transfection efficiency of pcDNA-ARF6 was validated using RT-qPCR (Fig. 7A). As expected, the expression levels of ARF6 in cells transfected with pcDNA-ARF6 were significantly upregulated compared with those in the pcDNA-transfected cells. To investigate the effect of ARF6 on the miR-28-3p mimic-transfected DU145 cells, pcDNA-ARF6 was transfected into miR-28-3p mimic-transfected DU145 cells. The results of the CCK-8 assay demonstrated that the overexpression of ARF6 significantly attenuated the miR-28-3p mimic-induced inhibitory effect on cell proliferation (Fig. 7B), which was consistent with the results of the cell colony formation assay (P<0.05; Fig. 7C and D).

Apoptosis was further determined by flow cytometry and western blotting after co-transfecting cells with miR-28-3p mimic and pcDNA-ARF6 for 48 h. The results revealed that the apoptotic rate was significantly decreased (Fig. 8A) and the ratio of Bcl-2/Bax was markedly elevated (Fig. 8B) following co-transfection compared with that in the miR-28-3p mimic-transfected group; however, the apoptotic rate was not completely recovered to the same levels as the control. Finally, migratory and invasive abilities were determined using Transwell assays. The results showed that the overexpression of ARF6 in miR-28-3p mimic-transfected cells promoted both migration (P<0.01) and invasion (P<0.01) compared with those in the miR-28-3p mimic group (Fig. 9). These findings suggested that AFR6 may attenuate miR-28-3p mimic-induced inhibitory effects.

Effect of miR-28-3p overexpression and knockdown on p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 expression

To further determine the molecular mechanism of the miR-28-3p-mediated biological functions, the effect of miR-28-3p overexpression and knockdown on p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 expression was analyzed. The results demonstrated that the overexpression of miR-28-3p significantly downregulated the protein expression levels of p-Erk1/2/Erk1/2 and Rac1 in DU145 cells compared with those in the mimic NC-transfected cells, but exerted no effect on Erk1/2 expression (Fig. 10). Meanwhile, the knockdown of miR-28-3p significantly upregulated the protein expression levels of p-Erk1/2/Erk1/2 and Rac1 compared with those in the inhibitor NC-transfected cells, but had no effect on Erk1/2 expression.

Effect of ARF6 and miR-28-3p overexpression on p-Erk1/2 and Rac1

To further determine the mechanism by which miR-28-3p and ARF6 affected the biological functions of PCa cells, the effect of the overexpression of these two factors on p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 expression was investigated. As shown in Fig. 11, the results revealed that transfection with the miR-28-3p mimic significantly downregulated the protein expression levels of Rac1 and p-Erk1/2/Erk1/2, without altering total Erk1/2 expression. Notably, the co-overexpression of ARF6 partially reversed the effects of the miR-28-3p mimic on Rac and p-Erk1/2 expression. Thus, miR-28-3p and ARF6 may mediate the Erk signaling pathway.

Discussion

PCa is a malignant epithelial tumor that occurs in the prostate (17). Numerous miRNAs, such as miR-1, miR-21, miR-106b, miR-141, miR-145, miR-205, miR-221 and miR-375(18), have been reported to be implicated in PCa progression. Among them, miR-28-3p was discovered to play a major role in several tumor types. For example, the overexpression of miR-28-3p increased the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells in vitro (19). Another previous study found that the expression levels of miR-28-3p were significantly upregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues and it was therefore suggested to be a potential novel serum miRNA marker to screen for ESCC (20). In addition, some miRNAs in urine supernatants, including miR-28-3p, were found to be potential noninvasive markers for bladder cancer diagnosis (21). Fuse et al (13) screened 56 downregulated miRNAs in PCa tissues in comparison to non-PCa tissues and discovered that miR-222 and miR-31 inhibited the proliferation, invasion and migration of the hormone-independent PCa cell lines, PC3 and DU145. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, the role of miR-28-3p in PCa remains unclear.

In the present study, the expression levels of miR-28-3p were found to be downregulated in PCa cells compared with those in RWPE-1 cells; thus, it was hypothesized that miR-28-3p may play a role in the development of PCa. To confirm this hypothesis, miR-28-3p-overexpressing and -knockdown models were established in PCa cells, and miR-28-3p overexpression was discovered to inhibit the cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induce the apoptosis of PCa cells. miR-28-3p knockdown was found to promote the cell proliferation, migration and invasion, whilst inhibiting the apoptosis of PCa cells. These results indicated that miR-28-3p may serve as a tumor suppressor in PCa and could represent a target for PCa treatment.

To further investigate the mechanism of miR-28-3p in PCa, potential targets of miR-28-3p were predicted using bioinformatics software and ARF6 was identified as a candidate target gene of miR-28-3p. Subsequently, ARF6 was confirmed as a direct target of miR-28-3p using a dual luciferase reporter assay, RT-qPCR and western blotting. ARF6 is a small GTPase that mainly regulates membrane trafficking and actin remodeling (22). Previous studies have shown that the upregulated expression of ARF6 may be closely associated with the invasion, migration and metastasis of multiple malignant tumor types (23), such as glioma (24), melanoma (25), breast cancer (26), lung cancer (27) and PCa (28). Shan et al (14) also reported that the knockdown of ARF6 effectively inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of PC-3 cells. Thus, miR-28-3p was hypothesized to affect PCa cell behavior via targeting ARF6 expression. In the present study, rescue experiments revealed that ARF6 overexpression could reverse the effect of the miR-28-3p mimic on proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion. These data indicated that ARF6 may be involved in miR-28-3p-mediated PCa progression.

Erk1/2 is a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, and Erk1/2 phosphorylation has been found to promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of PCa cells (29). Rac1, one of the best-characterized members of the small GTPase family, has been reported to be involved in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton, cell proliferation, tumorigenesis and metastasis (30). ARF6 has also been identified as a potent modulator of Erk and Rac1 activity. Hu et al (31) reported that ARF6 regulated glioma cell migration and invasion via a Rac1-dependent pathway. Tague et al (32) revealed that ARF6 promoted melanoma cell invasion by enhancing Erk1/2 phosphorylation. In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, the knockdown of ARF6 inhibited cell migration and invasion by decreasing Erk1/2 phosphorylation levels and Rac1 activity (33). In PC-3 PCa cells, the knockdown of ARF6 inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion by downregulating p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 expression (14). Thus, the present study sought to determine whether miR-28-3p regulated p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 expression by targeting ARF6 in PCa. Western blotting showed that transfection with the miR-28-3p mimic downregulated p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 protein expression levels, indicating that miR-28-3p may suppress p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 in PCa. Furthermore, rescue experiments revealed that the overexpression of ARF6 attenuated the inhibitory effects of the miR-28-3p mimic on p-Erk1/2 and Rac1. Taken together, these results suggested that miR-28-3p may suppress p-Erk1/2 and Rac1 expression, at least partly, by targeting ARF6 in PCa.

In conclusion, the present results suggested that miR-28-3p may act as a tumor suppressor gene in PCa and may be involved in PCa by targeting ARF6 to downregulate the expression of p-Erk1/2 and Rac1. Therefore, miR-28-3p may represent a novel target for the treatment of PCa. However, this study has its own limitations. For example, the effect of miR-28-3p in PCa was only explored in PCa DU145 cells and will need to be investigated in different cell lines in the future to verify the current findings.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (grant no. 2018J01219).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JZ and YY conceived and designed the experiments. HL and SY performed the experiments and analyzed the data. JZ and YY wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. JZ and YY confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Nagaya N and Horie S: Endocrine therapy for prostate cancer. Clin Calcium. 28:1527–1533. 2018.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese).

3 

Nead KT, Sinha S and Nguyen PL: Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer and dementia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 20:259–264. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Fujita K and Nonomura N: Role of androgen receptor in prostate cancer: A review. World J Mens Health. 37:288–295. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Carruba G: Estrogens in prostate cancer. In: Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Perspective. Tewari, AK (ed). Springer, London, pp369-381, 2013.

6 

Guo H, Ingolia NT, Weissman JS and Bartel DP: Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature. 466:835–840. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Tutar Y: miRNA and cancer; computational and experimental approaches. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 15(429)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Krol J, Loedige I and Filipowicz W: The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat Rev Genet. 11:597–610. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Vanacore D, Boccellino M, Rossetti S, Cavaliere C, D'Aniello C, Di Franco R, Romano FJ, Montanari M, La Mantia E, Piscitelli R, et al: Micrornas in prostate cancer: An overview. Oncotarget. 8:50240–50251. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Bonci D, Coppola V, Musumeci M, Addario A, Giuffrida R, Memeo L, D'Urso L, Pagliuca A, Biffoni M, Labbaye C, et al: The miR-15a-miR-16-1 cluster controls prostate cancer by targeting multiple oncogenic activities. Nat Med. 14:1271–177. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Noonan EJ, Place RF, Pookot D, Basak S, Whitson JM, Hirata H, Giardina C and Dahiya R: miR-449a targets HDAC-1 and induces growth arrest in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 28:1714–1724. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Fletcher CE, Sulpice E, Combe S, Shibakawa A, Leach DA, Hamilton MP, Chrysostomou SL, Sharp A, Welti J, Yuan W, et al: Androgen receptor-modulatory microRNAs provide insight into therapy resistance and therapeutic targets in advanced prostate cancer. Oncogene. 38:5700–5724. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Fuse M, Kojima S, Enokida H, Chiyomaru T, Yoshino H, Nohata N, Kinoshita T, Sakamoto S, Naya Y, Nakagawa M, et al: Tumor suppressive microRNAs (miR-222 and miR-31) regulate molecular pathways based on microRNA expression signature in prostate cancer. J Hum Genet. 57:691–699. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Shan XW, Lv SD, Yu XM, Hu ZF, Zhang JJ, Wang GF and Wei Q: Small RNA interference-mediated ADP-ribosylation factor 6 silencing inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion of human prostate cancer PC-3 cells. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 36:735–743. 2016.PubMed/NCBI(In Chinese).

15 

Hongu T, Yamauchi Y, Funakoshi Y, Katagiri N, Ohbayashi N and Kanaho Y: Pathological functions of the small GTPase Arf6 in cancer progression: Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Small GTPases. 7:47–53. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Han W and Li J: Structure-activity relationship analysis of 3-phenylpyrazole derivatives as androgen receptor antagonists. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 38:2582–2591. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Luu HN, Lin HY, Sørensen KD, Ogunwobi OO, Kumar N, Chornokur G, Phelan C, Jones D, Kidd L, Batra J, et al: miRNAs associated with prostate cancer risk and progression. BMC Urol. 17(18)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Almeida MI, Nicoloso MS, Zeng L, Ivan C, Spizzo R, Gafà R, Xiao L, Zhang X, Vannini I, Fanini F, et al: Strand-specific miR-28-5p and miR-28-3p have distinct effects in colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 142:886–896.e9. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu D, Shan X, Zhou X, Qi LW, Wu L, Zhu J, Cheng W, Zhang H, et al: A novel serum microRNA signature to screen esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 6:109–119. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Pospisilova S, Pazourkova E, Horinek A, Brisuda A, Svobodova I, Soukup V, Hrbacek J, Capoun O, Hanus T, Mares J, et al: MicroRNAs in urine supernatant as potential non-invasive markers for bladder cancer detection. Neoplasma. 63:799–808. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Hongu T and Kanaho Y: Versatile in vivo functions of the small GTPase Arf6. Seikagaku. 88:78–85. 2016.PubMed/NCBI(In Japanese).

23 

Li R, Peng C, Zhang X, Wu Y, Pan S and Xiao Y: Roles of Arf6 in cancer cell invasion, metastasis and proliferation. Life Sci. 182:80–84. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Li M, Wang J, Ng SS, Chan CY, He ML, Yu F, Lai L, Shi C, Chen Y, Yew DT, et al: Adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation factor 6 is required for epidermal growth factor-induced glioblastoma cell proliferation. Cancer. 115:4959–4972. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Grossmann AH, Yoo JH, Clancy J, Sorensen LK, Sedgwick A, Tong Z, Ostanin K, Rogers A, Grossmann KF, Tripp SR, et al: The small GTPase ARF6 stimulates β-catenin transcriptional activity during WNT5A-mediated melanoma invasion and metastasis. Sci Signal. 6(ra14)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Hashimoto S, Onodera Y, Hashimoto A, Tanaka M, Hamaguchi M, Yamada A and Sabe H: Requirement for Arf6 in breast cancer invasive activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:6647–6652. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Menju T, Hashimoto S, Hashimoto A, Otsuka Y, Handa H, Ogawa E, Toda Y, Wada H, Date H, Sabe H, et al: Engagement of overexpressed Her2 with GEP100 induces autonomous invasive activities and provides a biomarker for metastases of lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. 6(e25301)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Liang C, Qin Y, Zhang B, Ji S, Shi S, Xu W, Liu J, Xiang J, Liang D, Hu Q, et al: ARF6, induced by mutant Kras, promotes proliferation and Warburg effect in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 388:303–311. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Klemke RL, Cai S, Giannini AL, Gallagher PJ, de Lanerolle P and Cheresh DA: Regulation of cell motility by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Cell Biol. 137:481–492. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Burridge K and Wennerberg K: Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell. 116:167–179. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Hu B, Shi B, Jarzynka MJ, Yiin JJ, D'Souza-Schorey C and Cheng SY: ADP-ribosylation factor 6 regulates glioma cell invasion through the IQ-domain GTPase-activating protein 1-Racl-mediated pathway. Cancer Res. 69:794–801. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Tague SE, Muralidharan V and D'Souza-Schorey C: ADP-ribosylation factor 6 regulates tumor cell invasion through the activation of the MEK/ERK signaling Pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:967I–9676. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Hu Z, Du J, Yang L, Zhu Y, Yang Y, Zheng D, Someya A, Gu L and Lu X: GEPl00/Arf6 is required for epidermal growth factor-induced ERK/Rac 1 signaling and cell migration in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. PLoS One. 7(e38777)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2021
Volume 22 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang J, Yao Y, Li H and Ye S: miR‑28‑3p inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promotes apoptosis by targeting ARF6. Exp Ther Med 22: 1205, 2021.
APA
Zhang, J., Yao, Y., Li, H., & Ye, S. (2021). miR‑28‑3p inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promotes apoptosis by targeting ARF6. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 22, 1205. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10639
MLA
Zhang, J., Yao, Y., Li, H., Ye, S."miR‑28‑3p inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promotes apoptosis by targeting ARF6". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22.5 (2021): 1205.
Chicago
Zhang, J., Yao, Y., Li, H., Ye, S."miR‑28‑3p inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promotes apoptosis by targeting ARF6". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22, no. 5 (2021): 1205. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10639