[Corrigendum] MicroRNA‑183 suppresses the vitality, invasion and migration of human osteosarcoma cells by targeting metastasis‑associated protein 1

• Authors:
  • Xiaoya Sun
  • Yan Xu
  • Shanfeng Zhang
  • Xinjie Li
  • Yadong Wang
  • Yan Zhang
  • Xuefeng Zhao
  • Yuebai Li
  • Yisheng Wang

• View Affiliations

  
  Affiliations: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, P.R. China, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, P.R. China
• Published online on: November 4, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10947
• Article Number: 25

• Copyright : © Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Article

Exp Ther Med 15:[Related article:] 5058–5064, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6068

Subsequently to the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors’ attention that, on p. 5061, certain of the data panels featured in Fig. 2C (showing the results of Transwell assay experiments) and Fig. 2E (showing the results of scratch-wound healing assay experiments) featured some overlapping data panels, such that the data, which were intended to represent experiments performed under different experimental conditions, may have been derived from the same original source.

Figure 2 miR-183 upregulation inhibits proliferation, invasion and migration in osteosarcoma cells in vitro. (A) The transfection efficiency of miR-183 mimic was assessed using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. (B) A Cell Counting Kit-8 assay was used to assess proliferation in miR-183 mimic-transfected, control and NC cells. (C) The effect of the miR-183 mimic on cell invasion was detected using a Transwell assay (magnification, x200) and (D) quantified. A scratch-wound healing assay (magnification, x100) was performed, (E) assessed at 0, 24 and 36 h and (F) quantified. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01. miR, microRNA; NC, negative control.

The authors have re-examined their raw data and identified the data that should have been included in these two figure parts. The corrected version of Fig. 2 is shown below, now including replacement data for Fig 2C and E. Note that these errors did not have a major impact on either the overall results or on the conclusions reported in this study. The authors regret that these data were mistakenly and inadvertently incorporated into Fig. 2, and apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused.