Study on the in vitro changes of human bone marrow‑related mesenchymal stem cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 26, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2024.5464
- Article Number: 23
-
Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Aging is closely associated with the occurrence and progression of senile diseases (1). Previous studies have shown that stem cell senescence is one of the key factors for the aging and functional decline of tissues and organs, which is also a key target for the prevention and treatment of senile diseases (2,3). With the acceleration of global population aging and the increase in life expectancy, research on the biology of aging, prevention and treatment of aging-related diseases is correspondingly increasing in importance (4,5). The concept of stem cell aging is among the most recent and significant concepts in the study of human aging. Stem cells should not be considered 'immortal', but they rather undergo gradual aging as the body ages (6). This aging process in stem cells results in a progressive decline in their self-renewal and multipotent differentiation capacities, which may lead to uncontrolled proliferation and differentiation. Such changes are key initiating factors for the deterioration of structural integrity, functional decline and the emergence of irreparable damage, subsequently contributing to the onset and progression of related age-related diseases (7-9). Additionally, the decline in bone marrow function is another contributing factor to the development of age-related hematopoietic disorders (10,11).
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are attractive targets in the emerging field of stem cell aging research (12,13). Due to their low immunogenicity and unique biological properties, bone marrow MSCs have been widely utilized in clinical applications, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, tissue repair, treatment of autoimmune diseases and as vectors for gene therapy (14,15). The relationship between the bone marrow hematopoietic microenvironment and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) has been frequently likened to a 'soil and seed' analogy (16,17). Bone marrow stromal cells and their precursors, bone marrow MSCs, are essential components of the hematopoietic microenvironment, interacting with hematopoietic progenitor cells that rely on this environment for proliferation, where a dynamic balance is maintained for hematopoiesis (18-20). MSCs serve an important regulatory role in the self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation of HSCs (21,22). Clinical studies have previously shown that reduced or abnormal hematopoietic function is relatively common in the elderly population, presenting as age-related anemia, leukemia and immune deficiencies (23-25). However, the mechanism underlying age-related hematopoietic dysfunction remain unclear, warranting further investigation into whether the aging of bone marrow MSCs is associated with this phenomenon.
Age-gradient-associated differences in MSCs are hypothesized to be key to analyzing hematopoietic decline in the elderly. Previous studies on the dynamics of bone marrow aging have identified significant differences between the hematopoietic microenvironments of the elderly and the younger population (26,27). Previous studies have demonstrated that aging of bone marrow hematopoiesis is closely associated with a decrease in IGF1 in the bone marrow microenvironment, and that Kitl and Igf1 expression are coregulated and variable between individual mice at the middle age and expression of these factors is predictive of HSC activation and lymphoid commitment (11,20). To further elucidate these differences and the microenvironmental theory underlying the decline in hematopoietic function in older individuals, the potential impact of the bone marrow microenvironment on hematopoietic function was investigated in the present study by examining the in vitro changes in bone marrow MSCs. Additionally, the present study seeks to establish a theoretical foundation for understanding the aging hematopoietic microenvironment, emphasizing that the fate of bone marrow hematopoietic cells is influenced not by intrinsic properties but by their external surroundings. This approach also offers novel therapeutic insights for the prevention and treatment of hematopoietic dysfunction in the elderly.
Materials and methods
Sample collection and categorization
Bone marrow samples were originated from the First Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China; collection lasted from 1/1/2024 to 1/6/2024). Volunteers (of either sex) without hematologic malignant diseases who had only symptoms of iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) were eligible for collection. The bone marrow samples were then categorized by age, designating volunteers aged ≤25 years as the young group (Y group), those aged 45-55 years as the middle-aged group (M group) and those aged ≥65 years as the elderly group (O group). Sex and age distribution of patients is included in Table I. The present study was approved (approval no. 2023092) by The Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to publication of the present study.
Bone marrow puncture
The posterior superior iliac spine was selected to be the site for bone marrow puncture. Specifically, 0.2 ml bone marrow fluid was extracted for the preparation of bone marrow smears, followed by Wright's staining (cat. no. S0217; BIOSS) to observe the morphological characteristics of bone marrow cells. A total of 3 ml bone marrow was collected from each volunteer for bone marrow culture.
Bone marrow cytological examination
Qualified bone marrow smears were prepared using Wright's staining technique. In total, 0.5-0.8 ml Wright's Giemsa A solution was added to the smear, ensuring that the staining solution covers the entire specimen for 1 min. Subsequently, Wright's Giemsa B solution was added to the A solution, with a volume that is 2-3X that of the A solution to facilitate thorough mixing, followed by a staining period of 3-10 min. After washing with water and allowing to dry, the proportions and counts of various hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow were observed under a light microscope (Olympus CKX41; Olympus Corporation) to assess whether the bone marrow sample exhibits signs of hematological disorders or malignant lesions.
ELISA
The supernatant from the bone marrow samples and the co-culture system were isolated before the capture antibody solution was added, which took place in a 96-well plate (cat. no. FCP962; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and was incubated overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the plate was washed five times with a washing solution to ensure drying. Plasma was then diluted with the sample diluent to concentrations of 1:5, 1:10, 1:50, 1:100 and 1:2,000 to ascertain the optimal concentration. Finally, the concentrations of stem cell factor (SCF; cat. no. QZ-10611), granulocyte macrophage (GM) colony stimulating factor (CSF; cat. no. QZ-10908), IL-3 (cat. no. QZ-10502) and erythropoietin (EPO; cat. no. QZ-10444; all from Quanzhou Jiubang Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) were measured through antigen-antibody interactions, before the absorbance (450 nm) of the cytokines was quantified using a microplate reader (Rayto RT-6100; Rayto Life and Analytical Sciences Co., Ltd.) in conjunction with a standard curve.
In vitro culture
Human bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated through red blood cell lysis (cat. no. BL503A; Biosharp Life Sciences), lymphocyte separation (cat. no. LTS1077; Tianjin Haoyang Biological Products Technology Co., Ltd.) and density gradient centrifugation (room temperature; 5 min; 16,020 × g). The isolated MNCs were then counted and evenly distributed into 60-mm culture dishes for in vitro culture. During the initial stages of cell culture, the medium DMEM F12 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; cat. no. FSP500; Shanghai ExCell Biology, Inc.) was partially replaced every 3 days until adherent-dependent cells emerged. Subsequently, a complete medium exchange and cell passaging procedures were performed to separate and purify the adherent-dependent cells. Furthermore, during the early phases of the in vitro culture of bone marrow MNCs, the supernatant cells were collected for additional in vitro culture. The supernatant cells were treated with a magnetic bead sorting kits (cat. nos. 130-092-263 and 130-100-453; Miltenyi Biotec GmbH), and these cells were successively treated with CD38- and CD34-labeled magnetic beads, respectively; and CD34-positive and CD38-negative HSCs were collected for co-culture operation under the action of a magnetic field by the negative and positive sorting methods, respectively.
Flow cytometry
After counting (1×106), adherent-dependent cells and suspended cells were allocated to Eppendorf tubes separately and treated with 5% BSA (cat. no. SW3015; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) blocking buffer under light conditions for 30 min. The adherent cells were stained with specific surface marker antibodies (dilution ratio 1:100) at 4°C for 30 min in the dark, including CD73 (cat. no. 561258), CD90 (cat. no. 555595), CD105 (cat. no. 561443), CD14 (cat. no. 557153), CD34 (cat. no. 555821), CD45 (cat. no. 555482) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DR; cat. no. 555811), whilst the suspended cells were stained with the appropriate antibodies against CD34 (cat. no. 555821) and CD38 (cat. no. 567147) (all from BD Biosciences) before identification using flow cytometry. Following washing with PBS (cat. no. G4250-500ML; Wuhan Servicebio Technology Co., Ltd.), the isolated and purified adherent cell pellet was collected, resuspended in 100 μl PBS and mixed gently with 900 μl of pre-chilled 75% ethanol to ensure complete homogenization for subsequent cell cycle assessment. After counting, these cells were also used for apoptosis measurement and subsequently resuspended in 500 μl PBS. Finally, the results of the cell cycle and apoptosis analyses were obtained through flow cytometry (BD FACSAria™ Fusion; BD FACSDiva™ Software; BD Biosciences).
Co-culture
The present study used multiple co-culture systems. The first system utilized bone marrow plasma from groups Y and O to intervene in the proliferation of bone marrow MSCs across the respective groups. The second system leveraged the suspended proliferative characteristics of HSCs and the adherent proliferative characteristics of bone marrow MSCs. In this system, Y group HSCs were selected as the experimental subjects to investigate their hematopoietic activity, with bone marrow MSCs from each group serving as intervention factors to establish an in vitro hematopoietic co-culture system. The third system involved co-culturing the bone marrow MSCs from group Y with the differentiated adherent bone marrow cells from group O. Subsequently, the pre-treated hematopoietic cells were collected for in vitro hematopoiesis assays and assessment of colony forming unit (CFU)-erythroid (E), burst forming unit (BFU)-E, CFU-GM and CFU-granulocytes/erythroids/macrophages/megakaryocytes (GEMM) formation.
Humanized hematopoietic colony formation assay
Y group hematopoietic stem progenitor cells were collected from the hematopoietic co-culture system, added to MethoCult® medium (cat. no. 04034; STEMCELL Technologies, Inc.), shaken well and then plated into culture dishes for incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 14 days. The types and counts of colonies were assessed using an inverted microscope (Olympus CKX41; Olympus Corporation). (A single CFU-E is formed by 8-200 erythrocytes; a single BFU-E is formed by >200 erythrocytes; a single CFU-GM is formed by at least 20 granulocytes and macrophages; a single CFU-GEMM is formed by >500 cells containing erythrocytes, granulocytes and macrophages).
EdU incorporation
Following intervention with bone marrow plasma, equal amounts of Y group bone marrow MSCs were seeded into culture dishes to restore normal proliferation. An equal volume of pre-warmed EdU (cat. no. C0078S; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) working solution (final concentration of EdU at 10 μM) and culture medium was then added to the dishes, followed by an additional 5-h incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2. After EdU labeling was completed, cells were treated with fixation and permeabilization solutions for 15 min, incubated with Click reaction solution in the dark at room temperature for 30 min and then stained for nuclei (cat. no. C1005; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Finally, proliferation was analyzed using fluorescence detection.
Immunofluorescence
After intervention with bone marrow plasma, equal amounts of M group bone marrow MSCs were seeded into culture dishes to restore normal proliferation. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (room temperature; 15 min) and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (room temperature; 15 min). Subsequently, they were incubated with antibodies for senescence-associated proteins p53 (cat. no. BF8013; Affinity Biosciences) (dilution ratio 1:500) and p21 (cat. no. AF6290; Affinity Biosciences) (dilution ratio 1:500) at room temperature for 1 h, followed by blocking (cat. no. P0260; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) (room temperature; 10 min) and incubation with secondary antibodies (DyLight 488, Goat Anti-Mouse IgG; cat. no. A23210; and Dylight 549, Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG; cat. no. A23320; both from Abbkine Scientific Co., Ltd.) (dilution ratio 1:100) at room temperature for 1 h in the dark to form antigen-antibody complexes. Fluorescence was then observed and quantified using a confocal microscope (AX/AX R with NSPARC; Nikon Corporation).
Osteogenesis and adipogenesis
Equal amounts of O group bone marrow MSCs, following intervention with bone marrow plasma, were seeded into culture dishes to restore normal proliferation. Upon reaching 70% confluence, the culture medium was removed, before 2 ml OriCell® Human BMMSC Osteogenic Differentiation Medium (cat. no. HUXMA-90021; Cyagen Biosciences, Inc.) was added into each dish, with the medium replaced every 3 days. After 2-4 weeks of induction, alkaline phosphatase staining (cat. no. G1481; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was performed to assess osteogenic differentiation. Similarly, when the bone marrow MSCs attained 70% confluence, the upper culture medium was removed and 2 ml OriCell® Human BMMSC Adipogenic Differentiation Medium A (cat. no. HUXMA-90031; Cyagen Biosciences, Inc.) was added to each dish. Following 3 days of induction, the medium was aspirated and 2 ml OriCell® Human BMMSC Adipogenic Differentiation Medium B (cat. no. HUXMA-90031; Cyagen Biosciences, Inc.) was introduced. After 1 day, medium B was discarded and medium A was reinstated. The two media were thereafter alternated in this manner whilst regularly monitoring cell status. Finally, Oil Red O staining (cat. no. G1262; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was used to evaluate the adipogenic differentiation of the cells.
Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8)
Bone marrow MSCs were seeded into 96-well plates, with 100 μl (containing 2,000 cells) added to each well. Following this, 10 μl CCK-8 (cat. no. C0038; Beyotime Institute of Biotechology) solution was added to each well and the cells were incubated in a culture incubator (cat. no. BB150-2TCS-L; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 6 h. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm and cell viability was analyzed based on the results.
Transmission electron microscopy
Bone marrow MSCs were digested with trypsin (cat. no. 25200072; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), counted and the cell pellet (≥106) was collected. Next, 3% paraformaldehyde fixative was gently added along the wall of the tube for at least 2 h at room temperature. Cell precipitates were stained (room temperature; 3 h) with heavy metal salts and embedded (room temperature; 1 h) in epoxy resin. After making ultrathin sections, (70-100 nm) they were used for observation. The prepared samples were subsequently sent to the Electron Microscopy Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University for observation.
β-galactosidase staining
Bone marrow MSCs were cultured to 70% confluency and then the upper layer of medium was removed. Following a wash with PBS, β-galactosidase fixation solution was added and the cells were fixed at room temperature for 15 min. After fixation, PBS was used to wash away the fixative and the cells were incubated overnight at 37°C with β-galactosidase staining solution (cat. no. C0602; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). For suspended hematopoietic stem progenitor cells, these cells were collected by centrifugation and stained using the same method. The stained cells were then placed on a glass slide for observation under an optical microscope.
Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq)
The isolated and purified Y group and O group bone marrow MSCs were sent to the Beijing Genomics Institute for RNA-Seq (BGI Genomics Co., Ltd.). The sequences and expression information of the transcripts from both groups were analyzed (https://biosys.bgi.com/#/report/login) using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment methods. The sequencing results were processed using the STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/) and Cytoscape software (Cytoscape 3.7.2; https://cytoscape.org/download.html) to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis of differentially expressed genes.
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
Under enzyme-free conditions, RNA was extracted from human bone marrow MSCs using an RNA extraction kit (cat. no. R0018M; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Primer sequences for the genes to be validated are included in Table SI. Reverse transcription was performed using RT kit (cat. no. RR037A; Takara Bio, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol, followed by qPCR using SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (cat. no. 639676; Takara Bio, Inc.) on the circulator real-time detection system (Bio-Rad). Actin was used as the reference gene. (Thermal cycle conditions: the first step of pre-denaturation 95°C for 30 sec, the second step 95°C for 10 sec and 60°C for 30 sec, cycle 40 times). The quantification method was the ΔΔCq method (28).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate at a minimum. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 9.5 (Dotmatics). Measurement data were expressed as the mean ± SD. Comparisons between two groups of data that met the criteria of normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were performed using an unpaired t-test. For comparisons among multiple groups, one-way analysis of variance was employed, followed by Tukey's post hoc test. For comparisons of data between groups at different time points, repeated measures ANOVA was utilized, with Bonferroni correction for post hoc analysis. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the relationships among various indicators. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Analysis of age-related differences in bone marrow function
For the present study examining the causes of diminished bone marrow function in the elderly, 184 anemia samples were collected using random sampling methodology (Table SII). Bone marrow smears indicated that the proportions of myeloid, erythroid and lymphoid lineages, in addition to the counts of megakaryocytes, were normal across all samples, suggesting the absence of hematological malignancies (Fig. 1A-C). Statistical analysis revealed that the O group comprised the highest proportion of samples, suggesting a significant degradation of hematopoietic function in the elderly. Furthermore, there were no sex differences among the groups, indicating that the decline in hematopoietic function did not vary between elderly male and female population (Table I).
The lipid composition in bone marrow samples exhibited differential levels based on age, with the O group showing the highest lipid content (Fig. 1D and F). MNCs were obtained from the bone marrow samples using density gradient centrifugation, where the data indicated a gradual decline in the number of MNCs as age increased (Fig. 1E and G). Assessments of hematopoietic-related factors in bone marrow plasma showed reduced levels of SCF, GM-CSF, IL-3 and EPO in the O group (Fig. 1H). In vitro cultured, magnetically-sorted bone marrow hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (Fig. 1I and J) were subsequently analyzed for the expression of surface markers using flow cytometry, revealing that CD34 was positive and CD38 was negative, consistent with the definition of bone marrow HSCs (Fig. 2A). Statistical analysis indicated that the content of HSCs sourced from the O group was the lowest, whilst that from the Y group was the highest (Fig. 1K). In the early stages of the in vitro culture of bone marrow MNCs (Fig. 1L), the upper culture medium of the O group exhibited the highest lipid production (Fig. 1M), although this phenomenon was not observed in subsequent culture and passaging stages. On day 6 of in vitro culture, bone marrow MSCs displayed trends of adherent aggregative proliferation under microscopy. Flow cytometry for the expression of surface markers demonstrated that CD73, CD90 and CD105 were positive, whilst CD14, CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR2 were negative, aligning with the definition of bone marrow MSCs (Fig. 2B). Compared with the other groups, the O group exhibited the smallest clustered area of bone marrow MSCs and the fewest number of cells forming clusters (Fig. 1N and O). These results suggested that the decline in bone marrow function among the elderly population is attributed to a reduction in the number of stem cells and a deterioration of their functional capacity, which is closely associated with the bone marrow microenvironment. However, the causal relationship remains to be validated.
Changes in the bone marrow microenvironment lead to a decrease in MSC numbers and function
To further investigate the effects of alterations in the bone marrow microenvironment on bone marrow MSCs, the in vitro proliferation of MSCs derived from bone marrow plasma samples of the Y and O groups across age gradients was next assessed (Fig. 3A). Control group results (no intervention) exhibited distinctively dense contact phenomena in MSCs during extensive proliferation (Fig. 3B). Microscopic observations revealed that MSCs in the experimental Y group exhibited a regular and organized growth pattern, forming membrane ridges at points of contact (Fig. 3C). Under identical culture conditions, MSCs in the experimental O group displayed fused growth characteristics, with unclear cell boundaries and varied morphologies (Fig. 3D). EdU assays demonstrated a reduced proliferative capacity in Y group MSCs in the O group compared with that in the control group (Fig. 3E and F). Immunofluorescence results indicated that Y group bone marrow plasma could decrease the expression of senescence-associated proteins p53 and p21 in M group MSCs, whereas M group MSCs exhibited increased levels of p53 and p21 following intervention with O group bone marrow plasma (Fig. 3G and H). Regarding the multidirectional differentiation capacity of bone marrow MSCs, a complementary trend toward osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation was observed (29). Differentiation results suggested that, compared with those in the control group, Y group bone marrow plasma enhanced the osteogenic potential of O group MSCs whilst diminishing their adipogenic capacity (Fig. 3I and J). During the in vitro culture phase, Y group bone marrow plasma significantly increased the viability of MSCs across all groups, whilst O group plasma led to decreased cell viability in all groups (Fig. 3K). Electron microscopy results revealed that MSCs from the experimental Y group contained abundant intracellular materials and active organelles, most notably the endoplasmic reticulum. By contrast, MSCs from the experimental O group exhibited irregular membrane folds, enlarged cell bodies, increased translucent intracellular materials and significant cell differentiation (Fig. 3L). These findings suggested that bone marrow MSCs are influenced by their growth environment, where modulating such bone marrow microenvironment will likely effectively alter the stemness of these cells (30,31).
Changes in MSCs lead to a decrease in hematopoietic capacity of HSCs
To investigate the direct relationship between age-related changes in bone marrow stem cells and hematopoiesis in the elderly population, bone marrow MSCs from various age groups were co-cultured with HSCs from the Y group using in vitro modeling (Fig. 4A). The MSCs co-cultured for this experiment exhibited robust proliferative capabilities in vitro (Fig. 4B). Statistical analysis indicated that during the early stages of proliferation in vitro, Y group MSCs displayed the highest proliferation capacity, whilst there was no statistically significant difference in cell numbers among the groups as culture time extended (Fig. 4E). Cell viability assessments revealed that primary cultured MSCs maintained robust cell viability at all stages (Fig. 4F). The proliferation of stem cells is closely associated with cell contact, where prolonged in vitro culture time may reduce the differences in stemness among the stem cells (32-35). Microscopic observations indicated that MSCs predominantly exhibited a spindle shape, where after extensive proliferation, a fusion growth phenomenon was observed, particularly pronounced in the O group (Fig. 4C). β-galactosidase staining for cellular aging indicated a significant presence of senescence-positive MSCs at areas of severe cell fusion growth (Fig. 4D and G). The levels of hematopoietic-related factors in different co-culture system supernatants were next measured and it was found that O group MSCs, as intervention factors, exhibited the lowest expression of SCF, GM-CSF and IL-3 when co-cultured with Y group HSCs (Fig. 4H). Compared with that in other systems, co-culturing with O group MSCs resulted in the significant aging of Y group HSCs (Fig. 4I), as evidenced by the increase in the proportion of senescence-positive HSCs (Fig. 4J). In human bone marrow colony formation assays, CFU-E and BFU-E colonies formed earliest, where statistical analysis of colony numbers indicated age-related differences among the experimental groups, with the O group exhibiting the poorest colony formation capability. In terms of CFU-GM and CFU-GEMM formation, the number of colonies and the density of cells within colonies differed significantly. Y group HSCs co-cultured with Y group MSCs formed a greater number of colonies with higher cell density, whilst Y group HSCs co-cultured with O group MSCs produced the fewest colonies with the lowest cell density (Fig. 4K). These results suggested that the state of MSCs coexisting with HSCs in the bone marrow will likely affect the hematopoietic capacity of HSCs (Fig. 5).
Loss of stemness in MSCs during in vitro culture
Bone marrow MSCs serve an important role in bone marrow function. To investigate the growth characteristics of MSCs, their morphological features were analyzed at various stages of in vitro culture. During the early primary culture of Y group MSCs, cells exhibited a spindle shape, characterized by relatively large nucleoplasm and a small number of protruding branches at the ends. As age increased or as the in vitro culture progressed, the intracellular content of MSCs became more abundant, where the nucleoplasm decreased and the spindle characteristics gradually diminished, resulting in a transformation to polygonal or irregular shapes until differentiation into terminal cells. This morphology was commonly observed in the long-term in vitro culture of O group MSCs (Fig. 6A and C). Culturing results indicated that the various morphologies of MSCs coexisted in the different age groups, each with specific proportions and patterns. Electron microscopy observations revealed that MSCs primarily existed in the following two states: A quiescent phase and an active phase. Compared with quiescent MSCs, those in the active phase exhibited increased organelle function, particularly in the endoplasmic reticulum, along with an increase in vesicular structures (Fig. 6B). Cell cycle analysis showed that MSCs predominantly remained in the G1 phase during in vitro culture, with age-related differences based on the culture stage. In the primary culture (P0 stage) of Y group MSCs, the proportion of cells in the G1 phase was the highest, whilst in the passaged culture (Pn, n≥3) of O group MSCs, the proportion of cells in the G1 phase was the lowest (Fig. 7A and C). Apoptosis results indicated that as age increased and culture time extended, the proportion of apoptotic MSCs was also increased, with a particularly rapid rise in late-stage apoptosis (Fig. 7B and D). These findings suggested that the stemness of MSCs evolves in relation to differences in origin and culture stage, highlighting the importance of the in vitro culture phase as a critical factor for intervening in their stemness.
Identifying key causes of MSC stemness loss through transcriptomics analysis
In the investigation of the key factors influencing the differences in stemness among bone marrow MSCs, early in the primary culture of the O group, certain bone marrow materials were found to exhibit substratum adherence, resembling the behavior of MSCs, primarily consisting of morphologically diverse bone marrow stromal cells, alongside the generation of highly refractive bone marrow terminal substances. Under these conditions, MSCs demonstrated reduced proliferation (Fig. 8A and B). Passage of these bone marrow materials showed no significant changes (Fig. 8C and D). The MSCs were then isolated from these materials for passage culture, where the results indicated that MSCs could effectively proliferate when the influence of the bone marrow materials was removed (Fig. 8E). When the efficiently proliferating Y group MSCs were co-cultured with these bone marrow materials, the morphology of the Y group MSCs transitioned from distinctly spindle-shaped to irregular polygonal forms, characterized by fusion growth (Fig. 8F). These results suggested that changes in the stemness of MSCs are influenced by their growth microenvironment.
To analyze this variability in MSC proliferation, Y group and O group MSCs, which were isolated and purified, were observed using both optical and electron microscopy. Y group MSCs primarily communicated through three types of contact: 'Synapse-to-synapse', 'synapse-to-nuclear zone' and 'nuclear zone-to-nuclear zone'. By contrast, O group MSCs exhibited more complex modes of contact due to increased synaptic branching and morphological diversity, with these three forms of cell contact being more pronounced among O group MSCs (Fig. 8G). Electron microscopy results indicated that Y group MSCs had smooth plasma membranes, uniform cell shapes and equal cell body sizes, whilst O group MSCs displayed irregular membrane protrusions, diverse cell morphologies and increased accumulation of translucent intracellular materials and glycogen (Fig. 8H).
In the transcriptomic analysis, KEGG enrichment analysis of differential genes between Y group and O group MSCs indicated significant differences in hematopoiesis and cell adhesion. Cluster heat maps revealed distinctions in genes related to hematopoiesis and cell adhesion between the two groups (Fig. 8I and J). GO_cellular component enrichment results suggested that the differences between Y group and O group MSCs are reflected in spatial changes of the plasma membrane and cell membrane transport systems (Fig. 9A). GO_molecular function enrichment results highlighted that the differences in membrane components predominantly manifested in the expression of cell recognition-related receptors and signaling molecules on membranes (Fig. 9B). GO_biological process enrichment results indicated that these differences are closely associated cell proliferation, adhesion, immune recognition and regulation of bone marrow MSCs (Fig. 9C). PPI analysis displayed the associations of the top 53 differential genes with the greatest variation (Fig. 9D). Finally, RT-qPCR validation results demonstrated substantial differences in cell growth and communication between Y group and O group MSCs (Fig. 9E), with differential validation also observed in genes associated with signaling recognition and immune response (Fig. 9F). These findings suggested that bone marrow MSCs exhibit varying functional stress responses to changes in the bone marrow microenvironment, ultimately adapting their stemness to meet the organism's demands.
Discussion
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is one of the primary modalities for treating hematologic malignancies (36,37). Transplanting HSCs in conjunction with bone marrow MSCs can enhance transplantation success rates and promote postoperative hematopoietic reconstruction (38). However, not all transplantation outcomes in clinical settings are favorable. Therefore, in addition to selecting appropriate donors, further investigation into bone marrow MSCs is essential for analyzing strategies to optimally reconstruct the hematopoietic niche (39,40).
Exosomes have emerged as a focal point in the study of bone marrow MSCs (41). The therapeutic effects of exosomes derived from bone marrow MSCs primarily result from their ability to mitigate inflammatory damage (42,43). This phenomenon is closely associated with the low immunogenicity of bone marrow MSCs (44). These attributes make MSCs widely used in regenerative medicine (45,46). This is likely to be one of the key functional manifestations of these cells within the bone marrow microenvironment and a significant factor for successful bone marrow transplantation. Experimental results indicate that the decline in bone marrow function in the elderly is not solely attributable to hematopoietic stem progenitor cells. The reduction in bone marrow MSCs signifies a dysfunction within the bone marrow of older individuals, whilst the formation of numerous terminal bone marrow cells serves as a compensatory mechanism for sustaining bone marrow function (47). The biological differences observed in isolated and purified bone marrow MSCs at various stages of in vitro culture are both a consequence of and a contributor to variations in the bone marrow microenvironment (48). Bone marrow MSCs achieve this adaptation through morphological and functional changes. Modifications in cell contact mechanisms and plasma membrane composition allow these cells to efficiently sense the requirements of the bone marrow. The heightened activity of organelles, primarily the endoplasmic reticulum and the increased presence of vesicular materials, suggest that bone marrow MSCs can effectively process signals from the bone marrow microenvironment. Compared with that in the Y group, O group bone marrow MSCs exhibited elevated expression of numerous immune-related genes, with receptors and pathways associated with immune function being activated within the membrane system (49). It has been previously reported that aging hematopoiesis tends to favor myeloid differentiation (50). Therefore, during the aging process, bone marrow MSCs will likely coordinate changes in the bone marrow microenvironment with the hematopoietic functions of hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (51).
The present study examined the relationship among the bone marrow hematopoietic microenvironment, hematopoietic stem progenitor cells and aging, to elucidate the factors contributing to the decline in hematopoietic function in the elderly. The accumulation of 'abnormalities' within the bone marrow microenvironment during cellular activities diminishes the stemness of stem cells and alters the expression of stemness-related genes. The fate of bone marrow stem cells is influenced not only by the cells themselves but also by their surrounding environment. In treating hematologic diseases in the elderly, the interactions among bone marrow stem cells merit further investigation, particularly compared with the changes resulting from the intrinsic aging of hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (52,53).
Overall, MSCs can assume an important role in bone marrow transplantation therapy and the treatment of hematopoietic disorders, which may provide ideas for novel therapeutic or adjuvant approaches (54). Because of the invasive procedures and ethical requirements of bone marrow aspiration, it was chosen to collect bone marrow from volunteers presenting with symptoms of IDA, in order to exclude the interference of hematologic malignant diseases on the one hand, and mainly because these individuals showed normal results on review after non-radiochemotherapy. Although the anemic samples may be representative of the general population, our approach minimizes the study limitations. The present study only dissected the differential changes in MSCs in young and old individuals from the perspective of an age gradient. Changes in the bone marrow microenvironment are highly complex with multifactorial outcomes. Other perspectives are needed to fully resolve the causes underlying differences in bone marrow function. Differences in the recruitment and migration capacity of MSCs can be performed in future studies, combined with self-renewal capacity assays and multidirectional differentiation capacity assays to assess capability of MSCs in different age groups. In clinical treatment, more effective bone marrow functional recovery can be achieved not only by screening the source of MSCs, but also by interventions to improve the function of the recipient's own MSCs, in addition to by enhancing the stemness of MSCs in transplantation therapy (55,56).
In conclusion, the findings of the present study provide novel theoretical support in utilizing MSCs for the treatment of hematological diseases, especially in bone marrow transplantation. On this basis, the stemness changes of MSCs were analyzed and are expected to establish more effective screening methods and interventions.
Supplementary Data
Availability of data and materials
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author. The data generated in the present study may be found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information under accession number PRJNA1183324 or at the following URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1183324.
Authors' contributions
CW and ZY performed all the experimental assays. LW, ZW, JH and YW designed the study. KD and JS analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. CW and YW confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved (approval no. 2023092) by The Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University (Chongqing, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to publication of the present study.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81873103 and 81673748).
References
Khaltourina D, Matveyev Y, Alekseev A, Cortese F and Ioviţă A: Aging fits the disease criteria of the international classification of diseases. Mech Ageing Dev. 189:1112302020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hakimizadeh E, Tadayon S, Zamanian MY, Soltani A, Giménez-Llort L, Hassanipour M and Fatemi I: Gemfibrozil, a lipid-lowering drug, improves hepatorenal damages in a mouse model of aging. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 37:599–605. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hakimizadeh E, Zamanian MY, Borisov VV, Giménez-Llort L, Ehsani V, Kaeidi A, Hassanshahi J, Khajehasani F, Movahedinia S and Fatemi I: Gemfibrozil, a lipid-lowering drug, reduces anxiety, enhances memory, and improves brain oxidative stress in d-galactose-induced aging mice. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 36:501–508. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cai Y, Song W, Li J, Jing Y, Liang C, Zhang L, Zhang X, Zhang W, Liu B, An Y, et al: The landscape of aging. Sci China Life Sci. 65:2354–2454. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tchkonia T, Palmer AK and Kirkland JL: New horizons: Novel approaches to enhance healthspan through targeting cellular senescence and related aging mechanisms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 106:e1481–e1487. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Rudolph KL: Stem cell aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 193:1113942021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu B, Qu J, Zhang W, Izpisua Belmonte JC and Liu GH: A stem cell aging framework, from mechanisms to interventions. Cell Rep. 41:1114512022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
López-Otín C, Pietrocola F, Roiz-Valle D, Galluzzi L and Kroemer G: Meta-hallmarks of aging and cancer. Cell Metab. 35:12–35. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Plakhova N, Panagopoulos V, Vandyke K, Zannettino ACW and Mrozik KM: Mesenchymal stromal cell senescence in haematological malignancies. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 42:277–296. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aguilar-Navarro AG, Meza-León B, Gratzinger D, Juárez-Aguilar FG, Chang Q, Ornatsky O, Tsui H, Esquivel-Gómez R, Hernández-Ramírez A, Xie SZ, et al: Human aging alters the spatial organization between CD34+ hematopoietic cells and adipocytes in bone marrow. Stem Cell Reports. 15:317–325. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Young K, Eudy E, Bell R, Loberg MA, Stearns T, Sharma D, Velten L, Haas S, Filippi MD and Trowbridge JJ: Decline in IGF1 in the bone marrow microenvironment initiates hematopoietic stem cell aging. Cell Stem Cell. 28:1473–1482.e7. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weng Z, Wang Y, Ouchi T, Liu H, Qiao X, Wu C, Zhao Z, Li L and Li B: Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell senescence: Hallmarks, mechanisms, and combating strategies. Stem Cells Transl Med. 11:356–371. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Al-Azab M, Safi M, Idiiatullina E, Al-Shaebi F and Zaky MY: Aging of mesenchymal stem cell: Machinery, markers, and strategies of fighting. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 27:692022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu Y, Ge J, Huang C, Liu H and Jiang H: Application of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for aging frailty: From mechanisms to therapeutics. Theranostics. 11:5675–5685. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burnham AJ, Daley-Bauer LP and Horwitz EM: Mesenchymal stromal cells in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood Adv. 4:5877–5887. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ambrosi TH and Chan CKF: A seed-and-soil theory for blood ageing. Nat Cell Biol. 25:9–11. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shannon K and Link DC: Soil and Seed: Coconspirators in therapy-induced myeloid neoplasms. Blood Cancer Discov. 1:10–12. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deniz IA, Karbanová J, Wobus M, Bornhäuser M, Wimberger P, Kuhlmann JD and Corbeil D: Mesenchymal stromal cell-associated migrasomes: A new source of chemoattractant for cells of hematopoietic origin. Cell Commun Signal. 21:362023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nachmias B, Zimran E and Avni B: Mesenchymal stroma/stem cells: Haematologists' friend or foe? Br J Haematol. 199:175–189. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Young KA, Telpoukhovskaia MA, Hofmann J, Mistry JJ, Kokkaliaris KD and Trowbridge JJ: Variation in mesenchymal KITL/SCF and IGF1 expression in middle age underlies steady-state hematopoietic stem cell aging. Blood. 144:378–391. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou Y, Cai X, Zhang X, Dong Y, Pan X, Lai M, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Li X, Li X, et al: Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells from human pluripotent stem cell-derived brain organoid enhance the ex vivo expansion and maintenance of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 15:682024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tang A, Strat AN, Rahman M, Zhang H, Bao W, Liu Y, Shi D, An X, Manwani D, Shi P, et al: Murine bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells have reduced hematopoietic maintenance ability in sickle cell disease. Blood. 138:2570–2582. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rossi M, Meggendorfer M, Zampini M, Tettamanti M, Riva E, Travaglino E, Bersanelli M, Mandelli S, Antonella Galbussera A, Mosca E, et al: Clinical relevance of clonal hematopoiesis in persons aged ≥80 years. Blood. 138:2093–2105. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stauder R, Valent P and Theurl I: Anemia at older age: Etiologies, clinical implications, and management. Blood. 131:505–514. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Colom Díaz PA, Mistry JJ and Trowbridge JJ: Hematopoietic stem cell aging and leukemia transformation. Blood. 142:533–542. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang L, Guan Q, Wang Z, Feng J, Zou J and Gao B: Consequences of aging on bone. Aging Dis. 15:2417–2452. 2023.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar N, Saraber P, Ding Z and Kusumbe AP: Diversity of vascular niches in bones and joints during homeostasis, ageing, and diseases. Front Immunol. 12:7982112021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen Q, Shou P, Zheng C, Jiang M, Cao G, Yang Q, Cao J, Xie N, Velletri T, Zhang X, et al: Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: Adipocytes or osteoblasts? Cell Death Differ. 23:1128–1139. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Redondo J, Bailey S, Kemp KC, Scolding NJ and Rice CM: The bone marrow microenvironment in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: Implications for mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cells Transl Med. 13:219–229. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Tan L, Liu X, Dou H and Hou Y: Characteristics and regulation of mesenchymal stem cell plasticity by the microenvironment-specific factors involved in the regulation of MSC plasticity. Genes Dis. 9:296–309. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Xie Y, Tang C, Huang Z, Zhou S, Yang Y, Yin Z, Heng BC, Chen W, Chen X and Shen W: Extracellular matrix remodeling in stem cell culture: A potential target for regulating stem cell function. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 28:542–554. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Samal JRK, Rangasami VK, Samanta S, Varghese OP and Oommen OP: Discrepancies on the role of oxygen gradient and culture condition on mesenchymal stem cell fate. Adv Healthc Mater. 10:e20020582021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kann AP, Hung M and Krauss RS: Cell-cell contact and signaling in the muscle stem cell niche. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 73:78–83. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Le Saux G, Wu MC, Toledo E, Chen YQ, Fan YJ, Kuo JC and Schvartzman M: Cell-cell adhesion-driven contact guidance and its effect on human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 12:22399–22409. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X, Huang R and Zhang X and Zhang X: Current status and prospects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 135:1394–1403. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang YJ, Pei XY and Huang XJ: Haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in China in the era of targeted therapies: Current advances, challenges, and future directions. Lancet Haematol. 9:e919–e929. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li T, Luo C, Zhang J, Wei L, Sun W, Xie Q, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Xu S and Wang L: Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells co-infusion in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 12:2462021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Katzerke C, Schaffrath J, Lützkendorf J, Janssen M, Merbach AK, Nerger K, Binder M, Baum C, Lauer K, Rohde C, et al: Reduced proliferation of bone marrow MSC after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with clinical outcome. Blood Adv. 7:2811–2824. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Comazzetto S, Shen B and Morrison SJ: Niches that regulate stem cells and hematopoiesis in adult bone marrow. Dev Cell. 56:1848–1860. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lotfy A, AboQuella NM and Wang H: Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes in clinical trials. Stem Cell Res Ther. 14:662023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang S, Lei B, Zhang E, Gong P, Gu J, He L, Han L and Yuan Z: Targeted therapy for inflammatory diseases with mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes: From basic to clinics. Int J Nanomedicine. 17:1757–1781. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Regmi S, Raut PK, Pathak S, Shrestha P, Park PH and Jeong JH: Enhanced viability and function of mesenchymal stromal cell spheroids is mediated via autophagy induction. Autophagy. 17:2991–3010. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Song N, Scholtemeijer M and Shah K: Mesenchymal stem cell immunomodulation: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 41:653–664. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoang DM, Pham PT, Bach TQ, Ngo ATL, Nguyen QT, Phan TTK, Nguyen GH, Le PTT, Hoang VT, Forsyth NR, et al: Stem cell-based therapy for human diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 7:2722022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsiapalis D and O'Driscoll L: Mesenchymal stem cell derived extracellular vesicles for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Cells. 9:9912020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang X, Chen D, Long H and Zhu B: The mechanisms of pathological extramedullary hematopoiesis in diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 77:2723–2738. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sanmartin MC, Borzone FR, Giorello MB, Pacienza N, Yannarelli G and Chasseing NA: Bone marrow/bone pre-metastatic niche for breast cancer cells colonization: The role of mesenchymal stromal cells. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 164:1034162021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Massaro F, Corrillon F, Stamatopoulos B, Dubois N, Ruer A, Meuleman N, Bron D and Lagneaux L: Age-related changes in human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells: Morphology, gene expression profile, immunomodulatory activity and miRNA expression. Front Immunol. 14:12675502023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kwack KH, Zhang L, Kramer ED, Thiyagarajan R, Lamb NA, Arao Y, Bard JE, Seldeen KL, Troen BR, Blackshear PJ, et al: Tristetraprolin limits age-related expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Front Immunol. 13:10021632022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
da Silva Gonçalves CE and Fock RA: Semaphorins and the bone marrow microenvironment: New candidates that influence the hematopoietic system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 76:22–29. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kokkaliaris KD and Scadden DT: Cell interactions in the bone marrow microenvironment affecting myeloid malignancies. Blood Adv. 4:3795–3803. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hofmann J and Kokkaliaris KD: Bone marrow niches for hematopoietic stem cells: Life span dynamics and adaptation to acute stress. Blood. 144:21–34. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mohseni R, Mahdavi Sharif P, Behfar M, Modaresi MR, Shirzadi R, Mardani M, Jafari L, Jafari F, Nikfetrat Z and Hamidieh AA: Evaluation of safety and efficacy of allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in pediatric bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BoS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Stem Cell Res Ther. 14:2562023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Si YC, Li Q, Xie CE, Niu X, Xia XH and Yu CY: Chinese herbs and their active ingredients for activating xue (blood) promote the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells. Chin Med. 9:132014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang Z, Wang L, Jiang R, Li C, Chen X, Xiao H, Hou J, Hu L, Huang C and Wang Y: Ginsenoside Rg1 prevents bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell senescence via NRF2 and PI3K/Akt signaling. Free Radic Biol Med. 174:182–194. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |