Prognostic role of lemur tyrosine kinase 3 in postoperative gastric cancer

  • Authors:
    • Zhengguang Li
    • Jun Wu
    • Mei Ji
    • Liangrong Shi
    • Bin Xu
    • Jingting Jiang
    • Changping Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 3, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2014.301
  • Pages: 756-760
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The treatment of gastric cancer has been unsatisfactory thus far; therefore, novel targets and treatment strategies are urgently required. Lemur tyrosine kinase (LMTK)3 is an estrogen receptor‑α (ERα) modulator with a central role in endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Moreover, the expression and polymorphisms of LMTK3 are correlated with the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Since estrogen receptor (ER) is also expressed and plays a role in gastric cancer, we herein investigated the expression of the LMTK3 protein in 83 gastric cancer patients by tissue microarray and analyzed the correlation between LMTK3 expression and the prognosis of gastric cancer. Our results demonstrated that LMTK3 was more frequently expressed in gastric cancer tissues compared to non‑cancerous mucosa (79.5 vs. 45.8%, respectively; P=0.000). The LMTK3 expression was significantly correlated with the depth of invasion (P=0.002) and disease stage (P=0.035). The Kaplan‑Meier analysis revealed that the postoperative survival of the LMTK3‑negative group was superior to that of the LMTK3‑positive group (P=0.043). Moreover, the multivariate analysis identified LMTK3 expression as an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer (P=0.019). These findings suggested that the expression of LMTK3 may be a negative prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Moreover, targeting LMTK3 is a potential strategy for the treatment of gastric cancer, although the biological functions of LMTK3 in gastric cancer require further investigation.

Introduction

The incidence of gastric cancer has been on the decline globally over the last few years, although it remains rampant in several countries and is currently the fourth most common type of cancer worldwide (1,2). In China, in particular, more new cases of gastric cancer are diagnosed annually compared to any other country. Gastric cancer is difficult to diagnose in an early stage and the long-term prognosis remains disappointing (3,4). Over the last few decades, there have been no notable advances in conventional therapy and the median survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer ranges between 9 and 11 months. Targeted therapy is a novel promising strategy for the treatment of malignancies. In gastric cancer, trastuzumab was shown to reduce the risk of death by 26% in the ToGA trial, when combined with chemotherapy in patients exhibiting high human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (5). However, the median overall survival in that study was only 13.8 months and the results were unsatisfactory. Moreover, a series of clinical trials indicated that there is currently no molecular-targeted agent superior to trastuzumab (6). Therefore, further investigation is required to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of gastric cancer, identify novel treatment targets or design therapeutic strategies.

Lemur tyrosine kinase (LMTK)3, which is a member of the LMTK family, is a serine/threonine-protein kinase that may be involved in the β-catenin pathway and leukemic cell survival (7,8); however, the biological function of the gene remains unclear. Giamas et al (9) recently demonstrated that LMTK3 is an estrogen receptor-α (ERα) regulator, with a central role in endocrine resistance. Moreover, the expression of LMTK3 was associated with breast cancer phenotype and patient prognosis (10).

It was reported that estrogens may play a role in gastric carcinogenesis (11) and tamoxifen may prevent gastric cancer in Helicobacter pylori-infected INS-GAS mice (12). Furthermore, estrogen receptor (ER) has been detected in gastric cancer tissues and proven to be correlated with prognosis (1315). Therefore, ER and related genes may represent potential targets for the treatment of gastric cancer (16). In view of the role of LMTK3 in breast cancer, we herein investigated the expression of LMTK3 and its correlation with the clinicopathological parameters and prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Materials

The gastric cancer tissue microarray (TMA) was purchased form Outdo Biotech Co., Shanghai, China. The tumor samples were obtained from 83 patients with primary operable gastric cancer who had undergone surgical resection between 2006 and 2007. All the patients in this series were Chinese, including 55 men and 28 women, with a mean age of 64.3 years (range, 37–84 years). All the cases were evaluable after array construction. All the patients underwent potentially curative tumor resection and none had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. The tumor histological types and grading were reviewed and classified according to the WHO classification criteria; the disease stage was determined according to the TNM staging system.

Immunohistochemistry

Anti-LMTK3 mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) was optimized to a working concentration of 2 μg/ml on full-face excisional tissue sections. Subsequently, gastric cancer TMA was conducted, comprising 4-μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue cores immunostained with the optimized anti-LMTK3 monoclonal antibody on the Leica BOND-MAX automated system (Leica Microsystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed in citrate buffer (ER1) for 5 min. Detection was achieved using the Polymer Detection kit (Leica Microsystems Inc., Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK). These detection systems contain peroxidase block, protein block, post primary block, Novolink polymer, 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen, Novolink DAB substrate buffer (polymer) and hematoxylin for subsequent counterstaining of the TMAs. Negative controls were performed by omission of the primary antibody.

LMTK3 immunoreactivity was detected in the nucleus and cytoplasm of gastric cancer cells to a variable degree. The stained specimens were then categorized into 6-degree classes according to the quantitative score. Initially, 4 degrees of the proportional score (PS) for the positively-stained cells were assigned as follows, according to the frequency of positive tumor cells: 0, none; 1, 1/100–1/4; 2, 1/4–1/2; and 3, >1/2. Thereafter, 4 degrees of the intensity score (IS) were assigned as follows, according to the intensity of the staining: 0, none; 1, weak; 2, intermediate; and 3, strong. The PS and the IS were then added to obtain a total score (TS), which ranged between 0 and 6. According to the TS, the LMTK3 expression of the tumor was classified as negative when the score was 0–3 and as positive when the score was 4–6. All the cases were independently scored by two of the investigators who were blinded to the clinicopathological or outcome data. In case of discrepancies between the two investigators, a consensus was reached via simultaneous examination using a double-headed microscope.

Statistics

The statistical analysis for TMAs was performed using SPSS version 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical significance was evaluated using the Chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. A multivariate COX regression analysis was used to evaluate independent associations. The survival curves were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the significance was determined by the log-rank test. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for each variable. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

Detection of the LMTK3 expression in gastric cancer

Immunostaining analysis revealed that LMTK3 was detected predominantly in the nucleus of gastric cancer cells, with variable cytoplasmic staining (Fig. 1). LMTK3 was also expressed in the adjacent non-cancerous mucosa; however, the positive rate in gastric cancer tissue was significantly higher compared to that in non-cancerous mucosa (79.5 vs. 45.8%, respectively; P=0.000; Table I).

Table I

Association between LMTK3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in gastric cancer.

Table I

Association between LMTK3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in gastric cancer.

LMTK3

CharacteristicsCasesNegativePositive (%)χ2P-value
Tissue25.7390.000
 Gastric cancer831766 (79.5)
 Non-cancerous mucosa834538 (45.8)
Age (years)0.0040.948
 ≤50725 (6.0)
 >50761561 (73.5)
Gender0.9960.318
 Male551342 (50.6)
 Female28424 (28.9)
Stage4.4450.035
 I+II1120 (24.1)
 III+IV844 (53.0)
Tumor size (cm)0.2840.594
 ≤5491138 (45.8)
 >534628 (33.7)
Depth of invasion9.2720.002
 T1+T21789 (10.8)
 T3+T466957 (68.7)
Lymph node metastasis0.3280.567
 N0+N1826 (31.3)
 N2+N3940 (48.2)
Distant metastasis1.3810.240
 M0741757 (68.7)
 M1909 (10.8)
Lymphatic and vascular invasion0.9870.321
 Negative691653 (63.9)
 Positive14113 (15.7)
Location0.1250.940
 Upper826 (7.2)
 Middle29623 (27.7)
 Lower46937 (44.6)
Grade1.990.158
 I+II37532 (38.6)
 III+IV461234 (41.0)

[i] LMTK3, lemur tyrosine kinase 3.

Correlation of LMTK3 expression with clinicopathological parameters and postoperative survival in gastric cancer

In the present study, we investigated the correlation of LMTK3 expression with clinicopathological parameters and postoperative survival. Our results suggested that LMTK3 expression was significantly correlated with the depth of invasion (P=0.002) and disease stage (P=0.035), which were obviously associated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. There was no significant correlation with the other clinicopathological parameters (Table I).

The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the postoperative survival of the LMTK3-negative group tended to be superior to that of the LMTK3-positive group, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.043; Fig. 2). Furthermore, as shown in Table II, the multivariate analysis confirmed that the hazard risk (HR) of death was significantly higher in the group with positive LMTK3 staining compared to the negative group (HR=3.071, 95% CI: 1.375–9.283). Therefore, it was suggested that positive LMTK3 staining may be associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Table II

Multivariate survival analysis of prognostic factors by Cox regression analysis.

Table II

Multivariate survival analysis of prognostic factors by Cox regression analysis.

Clinicopathological parametersHR (95% CI)P-value
LMTK3
 Higher/lower3.071 (1.375–9.283)0.019
Gender
 Female/male0.684 (0.375–1.247)0.215
Age (years)
 ≤50/>500.896 (0.350–2.295)0.819
Grade
 III+IV/I+II1.373 (0.881–2.139)0.161
Size (cm)
 >5/≤51.279 (0.720–2.727)0.401
TNM stage
 III+IV/I+II3.642 (2.934–10.887)0.015

[i] HR, hazard risk; CI, confidence interval; LMTK3, lemur tyrosine kinase 3.

Discussion

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide; however, over the last few decades, there have been no significant advances in the treatment of gastric cancer and the conventionally used methods have been proven unsatisfactory. Molecular-targeted therapy has become indispensable in the treatment of malignancies, such as trastuzumab for breast cancer and gefitinib or erlotinib for non-small-cell lung cancer. However, to date, only a limited number of targeted agents were shown to be of clinical benefit for gastric cancer, including trastuzumab and ramucirumab (17). Due to the significant heterogeneity of gastric cancer, HER2 is only overexpressed in only a few patients and the majority of the patients cannot benefit from trastuzumab (18,19). To overcome the difficulties in gastric cancer treatment, more efficient biomarkers, molecular targets and novel therapeutic strategies are urgently required.

Endocrine therapy is important for the treatment of hormone-dependent malignancies, such as breast and prostate cancer. Estrogen and ER also play and important role in gastric cancer. According to epidemiological evidence and animal studies, estrogen plays a protective role in gastric tumorigenesis (2022). Although not a direct target organ of sex hormones, ERα and ERβ were both found to be expressed in gastric cancer tissue. Further investigation demonstrated that the expression of ER was correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients, with the two subtypes playing different roles (13,14,2326). As regards ER, certain studies on anti-estrogen endocrine therapy have been conducted on gastric cancer; however, the results were not satisfactory and did not significantly affect the treatment outcome (2730). Despite the unsatisfactory attempts, it was suggested that endocrine therapy may be a useful strategy for the treatment of gastric cancer, provided another efficient related target was utilized to improve the effect, rather than directly blocking ER (31).

The first studies on LMTK3 were mainly focused on breast cancer. However, we recently demonstrated the presence of LMTK3 protein in the blood of patients with colorectal cancer and serum LMTK3 may be a valuable biomarker for predicting disease progression and prognosis in such patients (32). Wakatsuki et al (33) reported that LMTK3 polymorphisms are correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer, but they did not extensively investigate LMTK3 protein expression. In the present study, we demonstrated that the positive rate of LMTK3 protein expression in gastric cancer was significantly higher compared to that in the adjacent non-cancerous mucosa. Furthermore, the expression of LMTK3 was correlated with depth of invasion and cancer stage. In addition, LMTK3 appeared to be strongly positive in all 9 specimens with distant metastasis (Table I), strongly indicating that the expression of LMTK3 is correlated with metastasis of gastric cancer, if the sample is of adequate size. Furthermore, the survival analysis demonstrated that the expression of LMTK3 was negatively associated with postoperative survival in gastric cancer patients. The multivariate analysis identified the expression of LMTK3 as an independent negative prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

In breast cancer, LMTK3 was shown to induce the estrogen pathway via ERα phosphorylation and high baseline LMTK3 expression was found to be associated with a poorer overall and disease-free survival (9,10). Of note, LMTK3 silencing through RNA interference significantly enhanced the growth inhibitory effect of tamoxifen in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell lines (9). According to the function of LMTK3 in breast cancer, targeted inhibition of LMTK3 aimed at enhancing the effect of endocrine therapy may be an efficient treatment strategy for gastric cancer, particularly in patients expressing ERα.

In conclusion, our results demonstrated that the expression of LMTK3 may be a useful biomarker as a negative prognostic factor in gastric cancer and a potential novel target for the treatment of gastric cancer. Given the differences in the ER subtype distribution between breast and gastric cancer, LMTK3 may be more than a modulator of ERα in gastric cancer (33). The association between LMTK3 and ERβ requires further investigation and the role of LMTK3 in the development of gastric cancer should be elucidated by further studies.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Technology Project of Changzhou Social Development (no. CS20102016) and the Natural Science Funds for Young Teacher of Soochow University (no. Q3124943).

References

1 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:10–29. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Kamangar F, Dores GM and Anderson WF: Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 24:2137–2150. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Huang JY, Xu YY, Sun Z, et al: Comparison different methods of intraoperative and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13:4379–4385. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Meyer HJ and Wilke H: Treatment strategies in gastric cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 108:698–705. 2011.

5 

Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, et al: Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 376:687–697. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

De Vita F, Giuliani F, Silvestris N, et al: Current status of targeted therapies in advanced gastric cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 16(Suppl 2): S29–S34. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Naik S, Dothager RS, Marasa J, Lewis CL and Piwnica-Worms D: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 is synthetic lethal to aberrant beta-catenin activation in colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 15:7529–7537. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Tyner JW, Deininger MW, Loriaux MM, et al: RNAi screen for rapid therapeutic target identification in leukemia patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:8695–8700. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Giamas G, Filipovic A, Jacob J, et al: Kinome screening for regulators of the estrogen receptor identifies LMTK3 as a new therapeutic target in breast cancer. Nat Med. 17:715–719. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Stebbing J, Filipovic A, Ellis IO, et al: LMTK3 expression in breast cancer: association with tumor phenotype and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 132:537–544. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Camargo MC, Goto Y, Zabaleta J, Morgan DR, Correa P and Rabkin CS: Sex hormones, hormonal interventions, and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 21:20–38. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Sheh A, Ge Z, Parry NM, et al: 17β-estradiol and tamoxifen prevent gastric cancer by modulating leukocyte recruitment and oncogenic pathways in Helicobacter pylori-infected INS-GAS male mice. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 4:1426–1435. 2011.

13 

Ryu WS, Kim JH, Jang YJ, et al: Expression of estrogen receptors in gastric cancer and their clinical significance. J Surg Oncol. 106:456–461. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Xu CY, Guo JL, Jiang ZN, et al: Prognostic role of estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 17:2503–2509. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Deng H, Huang X, Fan J, et al: A variant of estrogen receptor-α, ER-α36 is expressed in human gastric cancer and is highly correlated with lymph node metastasis. Oncol Rep. 24:171–176. 2010.

16 

Zhou J, Teng R, Xu C, et al: Overexpression of ERα inhibits proliferation and invasion of MKN28 gastric cancer cells by suppressing β-catenin. Oncol Rep. 30:1622–1630. 2013.

17 

Cho JY: Molecular diagnosis for personalized target therapy in gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 13:129–135. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Gravalos C and Jimeno A: HER2 in gastric cancer: a new prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target. Ann Oncol. 19:1523–1529. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Jorgensen JT and Hersom M: HER2 as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer - a systematic analysis of data from the literature. J Cancer. 3:137–144. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Furukawa H, Iwanaga T, Koyama H and Taniguchi H: Effect of sex hormones on the experimental induction of cancer in rat stomach - a preliminary study. Digestion. 23:151–155. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Lindblad M, Ye W, Rubio C and Lagergren J: Estrogen and risk of gastric cancer: a protective effect in a nationwide cohort study of patients with prostate cancer in Sweden. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 13:2203–2207. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Chandanos E and Lagergren J: Oestrogen and the enigmatic male predominance of gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 44:2397–2403. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Gan L, He J, Zhang X, et al: Expression profile and prognostic role of sex hormone receptors in gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 12:5662012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Matsuyama S, Ohkura Y, Eguchi H, et al: Estrogen receptor beta is expressed in human stomach adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 128:319–324. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Wang M, Pan JY, Song GR, Chen HB, An LJ and Qu SX: Altered expression of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: correlation with prothymosin alpha and clinicopathological parameters. Eur J Surg Oncol. 33:195–201. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Chandanos E, Rubio CA, Lindblad M, et al: Endogenous estrogen exposure in relation to distribution of histological type and estrogen receptors in gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 11:168–174. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Kitaoka H: Chemo-endocrine therapy of diffuse carcinoma of the stomach and its clinical evaluation. Jpn J Cancer Clinics. 31(Suppl 9): 1189–1194. 1985.(In Japanese).

28 

Harrison JD, Morris DL, Ellis IO, Jones JA and Jackson I: The effect of tamoxifen and estrogen receptor status on survival in gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 64:1007–1010. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kojima O and Takahashi T: Endocrine therapy of scirrhous carcinoma of the stomach. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 13:2526–2531. 1986.(In Japanese).

30 

Kitaoka H: Sex hormone dependency in diffuse carcinoma of the stomach and results of chemo-endocrine therapy. Jpn J Cancer Clinics. 30(Suppl 6): 741–748. 1984.(In Japanese).

31 

Kim MJ, Cho SI, Lee KO, Han HJ, Song TJ and Park SH: Effects of 17β-estradiol and estrogen receptor antagonists on the proliferation of gastric cancer cell lines. J Gastric Cancer. 13:172–178. 2013.

32 

Shi H, Wu J, Ji M, et al: Serum lemur tyrosine kinase 3 expression in colorectal cancer patients predicts cancer progression and prognosis. Med Oncol. 30:7542013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Wakatsuki T, LaBonte MJ, Bohanes PO, et al: Prognostic role of lemur tyrosine kinase-3 germline polymorphisms in adjuvant gastric cancer in Japan and the United States. Mol Cancer Ther. 12:2261–2272. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-October 2014
Volume 2 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li Z, Wu J, Ji M, Shi L, Xu B, Jiang J and Wu C: Prognostic role of lemur tyrosine kinase 3 in postoperative gastric cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2: 756-760, 2014.
APA
Li, Z., Wu, J., Ji, M., Shi, L., Xu, B., Jiang, J., & Wu, C. (2014). Prognostic role of lemur tyrosine kinase 3 in postoperative gastric cancer. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 2, 756-760. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2014.301
MLA
Li, Z., Wu, J., Ji, M., Shi, L., Xu, B., Jiang, J., Wu, C."Prognostic role of lemur tyrosine kinase 3 in postoperative gastric cancer". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 2.5 (2014): 756-760.
Chicago
Li, Z., Wu, J., Ji, M., Shi, L., Xu, B., Jiang, J., Wu, C."Prognostic role of lemur tyrosine kinase 3 in postoperative gastric cancer". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 2, no. 5 (2014): 756-760. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2014.301