1
|
Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et
al American Society of Clinical Oncology: American Society of
Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node
biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 23:7703–7720.
2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al:
Breast Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care; Ontario's Program
in Evidence-Based Care: Surgical management of early stage invasive
breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg. 48:185–194.
2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Dabakuyo TS, Fraisse J, Causeret S, et al:
A multicenter cohort study to compare quality of life in breast
cancer patients according to sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary
lymph node dissection. Ann Oncol. 20:1352–1361. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M, et al: The
risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for
breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node
dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures. Ann Surg.
240:462–471. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Yang WT, Chang J and Metreweli C: Patients
with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and
gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph
nodes. Radiology. 215:568–573. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J and Pisani P:
Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 55:74–108. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al:
Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total
mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the
treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 347:1233–1241.
2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al:
Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in
the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med.
332:907–911. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Lacour J, Le M, Caceres E, Koszarowski T,
Veronesi U and Hill C: Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy
plus internal mammary dissection. Ten year results of an
international cooperative trial in breast cancer. Cancer.
51:1941–1943. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Maddox WA, Carpenter JT, Laws HL, et al: A
randomized prospective trial of radical (Halsted) mastectomy versus
modified radical mastectomy in 311 breast cancer patients. Ann
Surg. 198:207–212. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Turner L, Swindell R, Bell WG, et al:
Radical versus modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann R
Coll Surg Engl. 63:239–243. 1981.PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Cabanas RM: An approach for the treatment
of penile carcinoma. Cancer. 39:456–466. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Kim T, Giuliano AE and Lyman GH: Lymphatic
mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast
carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cancer. 106:4–16. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Turner RM, Cody HS
and Macaskill P: Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of
axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its
accuracy and utility in staging the axilla. Ann Surg. 254:243–251.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
15
|
Ko EY, Han BK, Shin JH and Kang SS: Breast
MRI for evaluating patients with metastatic axillary lymph node and
initially negative mammography and sonography. Korean J Radiol.
8:382–389. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
16
|
Mameri CS, Kemp C, Goldman SM, Sobral LA
and Ajzen S: Impact of breast MRI on surgical treatment, axillary
approach, and systemic therapy for breast cancer. Breast J.
14:236–244. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
17
|
Garcia Fernández A, Fraile M, Giménez N,
et al: Use of axillary ultrasound, ultrasound-fine needle
aspiration biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in the
preoperative triage of breast cancer patients considered for
sentinel node biopsy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 37:16–22. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
18
|
Harnan SE, Cooper KL, Meng Y, et al:
Magnetic resonance for assessment of axillary lymph node status in
early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J
Surg Oncol. 37:928–936. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
19
|
Kvistad KA, Rydland J, Smethurst HB,
Lundgren S, Fjosne HE and Haraldseth O: Axillary lymph node
metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic
contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol. 10:1464–1471. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
20
|
Peare R, Staff RT and Heys SD: The use of
FDG-PET in assessing axillary lymph node status in breast cancer: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast
Cancer Res Treat. 123:281–290. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
21
|
Valente SA, Levine GM, Silverstein MJ, et
al: Accuracy of predicting axillary lymph node positivity by
physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic
resonance imaging. Ann Surg Oncol. 19:1825–1830. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
22
|
Hwang SO, Lee SW, Kim HJ, Kim WW, Park HY
and Jung JH: The comparative study of ultrasonography,
contrast-enhanced MRI, and18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting axillary
lymph node metastasis in T1 breast cancer. J Breast Cancer.
16:315–321. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
23
|
Quon A and Gambhir SS: FDG-PET and beyond:
molecular breast cancer imaging. J Clin Oncol. 23:1664–1673. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
24
|
Omoto K, Matsunaga H, Take N, et al:
Sentinel node detection method using contrast-enhanced
ultrasonography with Sonazoid in breast cancer: preliminary
clinical study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 35:1249–1256. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
25
|
Aoki T, Moriyasu F, Yamamoto K, Shimizu M,
Yamada M and Imai Y: Image of tumor metastasis and inflammatory
lymph node enlargement by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. World
J Radiol. 3:298–305. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|