Levels of serum fibronectin as a biomarker in gastric cancer patients: Correlation with clinical diagnosis and outcome
- Authors:
- Faruk Tas
- Elif Bilgin
- Senem Karabulut
- Didem Tastekin
- Derya Duranyildiz
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Capa, Istanbul 34390, Turkey
- Published online on: February 2, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.759
-
Pages:
655-659
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Fibronectin is an important component of the extracellular matrix and serves a role in the pathogenesis of multiple malignancies. The expression of fibronectin also affects the outcome for patients with cancer. The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical significance of the serum fibronectin levels in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 63 patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric cancer were enrolled into the present study. Serum fibronectin concentrations were determined by the solid‑phase sandwich enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay method. Age and sex matched healthy controls (n=30) were included in the analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range 28‑82 years). The baseline serum fibronectin levels of the patients with gastric cancer were significantly higher compared with those in the control group (median values, 606, vs. 193 ng/ml; P<0.001). The known clinical variables, including the age of the patient, gender, site of lesion, histology, histological grade, stage of disease and serum tumor markers, including lactate dehydrogenase, carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 19.9, were not found to be correlated with serum fibronectin concentrations (P>0.05). In addition, no correlation was observed in serum fibronectin level and response to chemotherapy (P=0.12). Serum fibronectin concentration demonstrated no prognostic role on survival (P=0.43). In conclusion, the serum levels of fibronectin may have a good diagnostic marker in patients with gastric cancer. However, its predictive and prognostic values remain to be elucidated.
View References
1
|
Pankov R and Yamada KM: Fibronectin at a
glance. J Cell Sci. 115:3861–3863. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Hynes RO: Fibronectins (1st). New York,
NY: Springer-Verlag. 1989.
|
3
|
Williams CM, Engler AJ, Slone RD, Galante
LL and Schwarzbauer JE: Fibronectin expression modulates mammary
epithelial cell proliferation during acinar differentiation. Cancer
Res. 68:3185–3192. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Han S, Khuri FR and Roman J: Fibronectin
stimulates non-small cell lung carcinoma cell growth through
activation of Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin/S6 kinase and
inactivation of LKB1/AMP-activated protein kinase signal pathways.
Cancer Res. 66:315–323. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Jerhammar F, Ceder R, Garvin S, Grénman R,
Grafström RC and Roberg K: Fibronectin 1 is a potential biomarker
for radioresistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Cancer Biol Ther. 10:1244–1251. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
David L, Nesland JM, Holm R and
Sobrinho-Simoes M: Expression of laminin, collagen IV, fibronectin
and type IV collagenase in gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 73:518–527.
1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Grigioni WF, Biagini G, Errico AD, Milani
M, Villanaci V, Garbisa S, Mattioli S, Gozzetti G and Mancini AM:
Behavior of basement membrane antigens in gastric and colorectal
cancer. Immunohistochemical study. Acta Pathol Jpn. 36:173–184.
1986.PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Li Y, Chen Y, Tao Y, Wang Y, Chen Y and Xu
W: Fibronectin increases RhoA activity through inhibition of PKA in
the human gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901. Mol Med Rep. 4:65–69.
2011.PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J,
Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S,
Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D and
Verweij J: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:
revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 45:228–247.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|