This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Sarcomas are tumors with mesenchymal origin and very poor prognosis compromising of 2% of all cancer deaths. These neoplasms are very rare and account for 1 to 2% of all malignancies (1-7). Sarcomas of the female genital tract have a low frequency of 3% (4,8,9). In particular, vulvar sarcomas account for 1 to 2% of all the vulvar tumors, compared to the uterine sarcomas, which represent the vast majority of all sarcomas of the female reproductive system (90%) (2,5-7).

Vulvar sarcomas comprise a highly heterogeneous group of histological types, which include leiomyosarcomas, epithelioid sarcomas, fibrosarcomas, liposarcomas, hemangiosarcomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, angiosarcomas, malignant hemagiopericytomas, neurogenous sarcomas, dermatofibrosarcomas protuberans, Ewing sarcomas, synovial sarcomas, clear cells carcinomas, malignant fibrous histiocytomas and sometimes aggressive angiomyxomas (1,3,4,6,10-12). The age of the described patients with vulvar leiomyosarcomas at the time of clinical presentation ranged between 14 and 69 years of age, with an average age of approximately 30-40 years (4,6,13,14). Vulvar embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma typically presents in girls less than 8 years of age (15). The size of vulvar sarcomas varies between 2 and 10-cm (4). Vulvar sarcomas are usually asymptomatic or they are characterized by non-specific clinical manifestations, such an enlarging vulvar mass with a local discomfort. Vulvar sarcomas located in the Bartholin's gland area are often misdiagnosed as their clinical manifestations are very similar to benign lesions. These lesions are most commonly misdiagnosed as Bartholin's cysts or abscesses resulting in delaying diagnosis and worsening the prognosis (11,12,6). In these cases, the late symptoms include pain, ulceration, bleeding and voiding dysfunction (3,6,11). Vulvar sarcomas are characterized by a high chance of metastasis; it seems that chemotherapy achieves regression of lung metastasis (6,12,14,16).

Leiomyosarcomas are the most common histological variants of vulvar sarcomas (2,5,7,17-22). Vulvar leiomyosarcomas are considered to originate from the smooth muscles within erectile tissue, blood vessel walls, rough ligaments, dartos muscles, erector-pili muscles and from stem cells localized in Bartholin's gland (22-24). Leiomyosarcomas occur most frequently in the labia majora, followed in a decreasing order by the Bartholin's gland area, the pericloitoral area and the labia minora (25,26). Localizations of leiomyosarcomas in the Bartholin's gland area are extremely rare and only few such cases are reported in the international literature (1,2,5,7,10,12,13,17,18). The biological behavior of the vulvar leiomyosarcomas is not fully understood and very little information is available so far (1). Most of the described cases of vulvar leiomyosarcomas in the international literature are about patients from Western countries suggesting therefore genetic disposition and lifestyle connection (27). A possible carcinogenetic precursor of these neoplasms is the chronic inflammation. This hypothesis is supported by the findings of coexistence between vulvar leiomyosarcomas and longstanding lichen sclerosus (28). Also, another predisposing factor of vulvar leiomyosarcomas seems to be the pregnancy because occurrence of them during pregnancy has been reported (10,17,29). It seems that the positivity of estrogen and progesterone receptors is implicated in the development of vulvar leiomyosarcomas. The potential impact of estrogens and progesterone signaling through their receptors may result in induction of proliferation and growth of DNA damaged cells resulting finally in tumorogenesis of the vulvar leiomyosarcomas (10,17,29).

The histopathological examination of the excised mass confirms the diagnosis of the extremely rare entity of vulvar leiomyosarcomas (2,5,7). Given the extreme rarity of vulvar leiomyosarcomas, an optimal treatment strategy has not yet been elucidated. It seems that their primary treatment of choice is the surgical excision, including wide local excision or radical hemivulvectomy. The usefulness of ipsilateral lymphadenectomy in the treatment of vulvar leiomyosarcomas is not clear because these neoplasms metastasize mostly by the bloodstream compared to lymphogenous metastasis. Locally recurrent tumors require adjuvant treatment in the form of radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is placed in the treatment of distal metastases; however the exact role of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy remains uncertain for vulvar leiomyosarcomas, which display very aggressive behavior and rapid progression (2,5,7).

Herein, we present a very rare case of vulvar leiomyosarcoma localized in the Bartholin's gland area in a 42-year-old female and describe its histopathological and immunohistochemical features. Also, the current literature is reviewed in terms of clinical signs and symptoms, diagnosis, biological behavior, prognosis and treatment. Vulvar sarcomas located in the Bartholin's gland are often mistakenly considered as benign lesions resulting in delayed diagnosis.

Case report

A 42-year-old patient presented to outpatient clinic because of a vulvar lump in the area of the left Bartholin's gland with a 6-month history of progressive swelling. In her gynecological history, the patient reported laparoscopic hysterectomy without salpingo-oophorectomy, two years ago, due to heavy metrorrhagia and the uterus was taken out through the vagina directly. The final histological exam of the hysterectomy showed benign leiomyomas within the uterus.

Pelvic examination showed a solid mass of 6.5-cm in maximum diameter, in the area of the left Bartholin's gland. Palpation of the inguinal lymph nodes in either groin was normal; there were no palpable nodes. The patient underwent wide local excision and the mass was enucleated completely from the bed. The surgical specimen was sent for pathological examination. We did not indicate a biopsy of the mass before the excision because our initial clinical diagnosis was as a chronic left Bartholin's gland abscess.

Macroscopically, the tumor was 6.5x4.5x3.5-cm in size with regular margins. Cut surface showed a whitish, homogeneous lesion with fibroelastic consistency.

Microscopic examination of the hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections showed intersecting fascicles of spindle cells (Fig. 1A and B), with moderate to severe atypia (Fig. 2A and B). The number of mitoses was up to 8 per 10 high power fields (Fig. 3A). The neoplasm to its greatest extent was circumscribed and in places had an invasive growth pattern. Tumoral necrosis was not seen. Involved Bartholin' gland by the tumor was identified. The tumor extended focally to the surgical margin (Fig. 3B). The neoplastic cells showed positive staining for smooth muscle actin (SMA) (Fig. 4A), desmin (Fig. 4B), HHF35 (Fig. 4C), caldesmon (Fig. 5A), vimentin (Fig. 5B) and estrogen (Fig. 5C) and progesterone receptors (Fig. 5D). Immunohistochemistry was negative for S100, myoglobulin, keratin 116, CD117, CD34 and CD31.

Figure 1 Spindle cell neoplasm with storiform pattern. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tumor tissues at a magnification of (A) x40 and (B) x100.

Figure 2 Moderate to severe cytological atypia. (A) Severe cytological atypia; hematoxylin and eosin staining of tumor tissues at a magnification of x100. (B) Moderate cytological atypia; hematoxylin and eosin staining of tumor tissues at a magnification of x100.

Figure 3 Presence of mitotic figures. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tumor tissues at a magnification of x200. (B) Focally infiltrated margin, hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue at a magnification of x40.

Figure 4 Immunohistochemical expression of spindled tumor cells for (A) SMA at a magnification of x100; (B) desmin at a magnification of x100; and (C) HHF35 at a magnification of x40.

Figure 5 Immunoreactivity of spindled tumor cells for (A) caldesmon at a magnification of x100; (B) vimentin at a magnification of x10; (C) estrogen receptors at a magnification of x100; and (D) progesterone receptors at a magnification of x100.

Thoracic and upper and lower abdominal CT scans were negative for malignancy. Also, pelvic MRI was non suggestive for infiltrative pelvic lymph nodes. The diagnosis was primary vulvar leiomyosarcoma, localized in the Bartholin's gland area. The patient was discharged from the hospital and during the follow-up, every four months, no local recurrences or metastases of the disease were observed 53 months after surgery and the patient is in excellent physical condition. Although the mass was greater than 5-cm and a focally infiltrated surgical margin was found in the histological specimen, the patient denied further surgery or/and local radiotherapy. During the close follow-up the patient did not complain about itching, burning, pain, numbness at the treatment site, body image disturbance or sexual problems.

Discussion

Primary vulvar leiomyosarcomas are extremely rare tumors and the localization of these tumors in the Bartholin's gland area results in diagnostic delays (7). Clinical differential diagnosis of vulvar leiomyosarcomas located in the Bartholin's gland area include Bartholin's gland cyst or abscess, infectious granuloma, syringeal, lipoma, fibroma, leiomyoma, hidradenoma, hidradentis suppurativa, hematoma, endometriosis, accessory breast gland, warts, paraganglioma or squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, transitional carcinoma, differential carcinoma, melanoma, spindle cell synovial sarcoma, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma, hibrosarcoma and epithelioid sarcoma (4,7,30-38). Furthermore, when the tumor is located in the Bartholin's gland, leiomyosarcoma should be distinguished from adenosarcoma, which is composed by a mixture of benign glandular epithelium and a malignant sarcomatous stroma (39,40). Diagnosis is made by the histopathological examination of a biopsy of the lesion or of the complete excision of the neoplasm. In our case, non-epithelial component was identified microscopically in the tumor and therefore we concluded the diagnosis of vulvar leiomyosarcoma. Metastatic dissemination of vulvar leiomyosarcomas is thought to be through the hematogenous routes. The most common sites of distant metastatic sites have been reported to be the liver and the lungs and occasionally the bones (1,37). The role of the lymphogenous routes for the metastatic dissemination of vulvar leiomyosarcomas is questionable (28).

Vulvar leiomyosarcomas can be distinguished from vulvar leiomyomas or vulvar atypical leiomyomas according to the suggestions of Nielsen et al (38). Three or more of the following histological and pathological characteristics are important for the diagnosis of vulvar leiomyosarcomas: i) The tumor has size greater than 5-cm in diameter; ii) infiltration is seen in the margins of the tumor; iii) the tumoral background consists of more than five mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields; and iv) the tumoral cells show moderate to severe atypia. Leiomyomas exhibit only one of the above features; atypical leiomyomas exhibit only two of these features (38). Both leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas exhibit immunopositivity for muscle markers including smooth muscle actin, muscle-specific actin and desmin and focal positivity for S-100 and cytokeratin (10). In our case, the neoplastic cells showed positive staining for smooth muscle actin (SMA), desmin, HHF35, caldsmon, vimentin and estrogen and progesterone receptors (Figs. 4 and 5).

A preoperative biopsy of vulvar masses located in the Bartholin's gland area and particularly in those with a complicated appearance is highly recommended because early diagnosis is important for curative treatment without delays of these extremely rare neoplasms (3,7,12,16,26). However, in our case we did not indicate a biopsy of the mass before operation because our preoperative diagnosis was as a chronic Bartholin's gland abscess. Superficial lymphadenopathy is due to a cyst, inflammation, lymphoma or metastatic malignant tumor (41,42). In the presence of a pathognomonic inguinal node the use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy is an easy, reliable and safe office procedure, which immediately provides an important tool of diagnosis (41). In the study by Altinboğa and Yüce (43) the lymph node fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) showed sensitivity of 95.4%, specificity of 94.1%, positive predictive value of 95.4% and negative predictive value of 94.1% (43).

The first-line treatment involves surgical excision of the lesion. Localized disease is usually managed with wide local excision with surgically free margins. According to Aartsen and Albus-Lutter (1) the width of normal margin-tissue proposed for the surgeon doing the excision is 2-cm and for the pathologist 1-cm because of the shrinking effect. Poor prognostic factors are considered to be mitotic rate more than 10 mitotic figures per 10 HPF, high histological grade, tumor size >5-cm, local recurrence and distal metastases (38,44). These neoplasms tend to metastasize by bloodstream and therefore ipsilateral lymphadenectomy is questionable (28). The decision to treat with vulvectomy is made by the size of the lesion (7,10,18). Inguinal lymphadenectomy does not improve treatment (1,22). The available data is limited and uncertain regarding radiosensitivity and chemosensitivity in the treatment of the vulvar leiomyosarcomas. However, in the presence of negative prognostic factors radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be given. Important favorite prognostic factors are the lower grade of nuclear atypia, the smaller tumoral size, the pathological confirmation of at least 2-cm negative surgical margins and the absence of local recurrences (1,2,12,14,22,38). Favor immunohistochemical factors include the overexpression of estrogen, progesterone and androgen receptors, the moderate immunopositivity for Ki-67 and the absence of p53 expression (4,22). It seems that the type of operation with inadequately resected tumors is the most significant negative prognostic factor for the appearance of local recurrences and distal metastases, compared to tumoral size of more than 5-cm (1). In addition to these factors, vulvar leiomyosarcomas with more aggressive behavior are defined on the basis of high cellularity, anaplasia, mitotic activity more than ten per 10 high-power fields, high grade of nuclear atypia and presence of tumoral necrosis (12,16). The indications for radiotherapy includes: a) positive margin tumor involvement at the initial surgical treatment and b) tumor size >5-cm (22,25,38,44,45). Pharmacogenomics biomarkers for the prediction of response to chemotherapeutic regimens seem to be involved in the improvement of molecular diagnostics in treatment of a specific subset of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Actually, human equilibrative nucleotide transporter 1 (hENT1) is a molecular biomarker that could predict gemcitabine efficacy in leiomyosarcoma (46). Furthermore, TP53 mutations are significantly associated with longer progression-free survival compared to TP53 wild-type (47). In addition, after 12 weeks of treatment with pazopanib, it has been found that the progression-free survival was positively correlated to high levels of interleukin (IL)-12 and mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 3 (MPC3) levels and negatively correlated with low levels of VEGF2 and high levels of placental growth factor (PGF) (48). In addition, in soft tissue sarcoma the activity of trabectedin was found to inversely correlate with the mRNA levels of BRCA1. Particularly, low levels of mRNA BRCA1 expression were associated with improvement in outcome of patients (49).

In our case, the neoplastic cells showed positive staining for estrogen and progesterone receptors (Fig. 5C and D), suggesting the potential role of estrogen and progesterone in the development and progression of vulvar leiomyosarcoma. However, in our case we did not examine the pre- and post-operative serum estrogen levels of our patient. Nethertheless, the predisposing role of estrogen and progesterone in vulvar leiomyosarcoma tumorogenesis is supported by their occurrence during pregnancy (10,17,29). It is possible that the positivity of estrogen and progesterone receptors may initiate the proliferation and growth of DNA damaged cells resulting in development and progression of vulvar leiomyosarcoma (10,17,29). The role of aromatase inhibitors (AIs), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), progestins and GnRH-analogues for the treatment of vulvar leiomyosarcoma and especially for their recurrences is not clear due to the rarity of this entity and the lack of clinical trials to determine the clinical efficacy and usefulness of the above regiments for first- and second-line therapies. However, we have some evidence in the case of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Particularly, patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma and a high expression rate of ER and PR show good response to hormonal therapy (50). Yamaguchi et al suggested that Letrozole as well as progestins could be the first choice for patients with recurrent or residual low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (51). It seems that letrozole is the first-line hormone drug for postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma, while exemestane and anastrozole are for second-line treatment in patients with recurrent, metastatic and unresectable uterine leiomyosarcoma (52). In a clinical trial by George et al (53) of 27 postmenopausal women with metastatic and/or unresectable uterine leiomyosarcoma with positive estrogen receptors and/or postive progesteron receptors it has been found that the rate of stable disease was 54% in all patients and the 12-week rate of progression free survival 50%. These findings suggest that strong expression of estrogen and progesterone expression in tumors is related with longer progression free survival (53). On the other hand, the use of progestins in uterine leiomyosarcoma should be cautious because medroxyprogesterone acetate in higher doses (5 mg/day) is able to significantly increase the growth of this neoplasm (52). In addition, it has been found that patients who receive tamoxifen treatment for more than five years show an increase in the incidence of uterine leiomyosarcoma to 17/100,000 women yearly (50,54). Therefore, tamoxifen is contraindicated for the treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma (52).

In the present case, we chose to treat our patient with wide local excision because of the patients' age. Also, after the histopathological confirmation of the disease, in view of the absence of pelvic lymph node infiltration suggested by the MRI examination, inguinal lymphadenectomy was decided not to be done. Our patient denied radiotherapy although the tumor extended focally to the surgical margin. In such cases, we recommend radiotherapy because the risk of local recurrence is related to the inadequate resection margins and not to the size of the tumor (39). Furthermore, Aartsen and Albus-Lutter suggested that the degree of differentiation should not be determined for the case of vulvar leiomyosarcoma (1). Therefore, in our case we did not indicate the grade of the vulvar leiomyosarcoma localized in the Bartholin's gland area. In addition, in the present study we resumed reported cases of vulvar leiomyosarcoma in a table according to their histological and immunohistochemical features, treatment and clinical outcome (Table I).

Table I Histological and immunohistochemical features, treatment and clinical outcome of vulvar leiomyosarcoma reported cases.

Table I

Histological and immunohistochemical features, treatment and clinical outcome of vulvar leiomyosarcoma reported cases.

Author- Published year	Age (years)	Size (cm)	MFI	MTCN	IHC	Initial treatment	Margins	Local recurrence	Treatment of recurrence	Follow-up	(Refs.)
Davos and Abell (1976)	41	NS	>10	NS	NS	Wide local excision	NS	NS	-	28 months, alive, NED	(18)
Davos and Abell (1976)	49	NS	>10	NS	NS	Local excision	NS	+	Wide local excision	9 years, alive, NED	(18)
Davos and Abell (1976)	84	NS	>10	NS	NS	Wide local excision	NS	+	No further treatment	6 months, disseminated metastases, died of disease	(18)
Davos and Abell (1976)	54	NS	>10	NS	NS	Local excision	NS	+	Hemivulvectomy; hysterectomy and excision of vaginal mass	9 years, disseminated metastases, died of disease	(18)
Davos and Abell (1976)	35	NS	>10	NS	NS	Local excision	NS	+	Re-excision; radical vulvectomy	9 years, alive	(18)
Møller et al (1990)	54	8	15	Yes- Focal	Desmin: Positive	Radical vulvectomy + inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy	No	No	-	30 months, alive, NED	(55)
Tawfik et al (1994)	52	15	25-30	Yes- Focal	SMA, vimentin, HHF-35, ER, p53: Positive	Local excision + radiotherapy	Infiltrative	No	-	14 months, alive, NED	(25)
Aartsen and Albus-Lutter (1994)	15	7	NS	NS	NS	Radiotherapy 40 Gy		+; 2.5 years	Wide Local Excision + Radiotherapy 40 Gy	24 years, alive, NED	(1)
Aartsen and Albus-Lutter (1994)	41	4.5	NS	NS	NS	Wide local excision	-	-	-	17 years, died of disease	(1)
Aartsen and Albus-Lutter (1994)	75	10	NS	NS	NS	Radical vulvectomy	NS	6 months & 3 months	Local excision -Local excision	4 months, died of disease	(1)
Aartsen and Albus-Lutter (1994)	67	10	NS	NS	NS	Radical vulvectomy	NS	5 months	Radiotherapy 49 Gy	7 years, died of disease	(1)
Fried-Oginski et al (1995)	31	5	4	Yes- Focal	SMA, muscular actin, vimentin: Positive	Local Excision + 8 weeks later Wide Local Excision	NS	10 months	Wide Local Excision + Radiotherapy	NS	(56)
Nielsen et al (1996)	33	5.5	5	NS	SMA, muscular actin, vimentin, desmin, ER, PR: Positive; keratin, S-100: Negative	Local Excision	Infiltrative	4 months	Wide local Excision	36 months, alive, NED	(38)
Nielsen et al (1996)	46	10	5	NS	SMA, muscular actin, vimentin, desmin, ER, PR: Positive; keratin, S-100: Negative	Modified Radical Vulvectomy	No	-	-	30 months, alive, NED	(38)
Nielsen et al (1996)	37	5	8	NS	SMA, muscular actin, vimentin, ER, PR: Positive; keratin, S-100, desmin: Negative	Wide Local Excision	Infiltrative	3 months	Wider Excision; positive margins again; modified radical vulvectomy	36 months, alive, NED	(38)
Nielsen et al (1996)	67	16	10	NS	SMA, muscular actin, vimentin, ER, PR: Positive; keratin, S-100, desmin: Negative	NS	NS	-	Local, radiotherapy chemotherapy	7 months, metastases to lungs and bones, died of disease	(38)
Nielsen et al (1996)	56	5.5	5	NS	SMA, muscular actin, vimentin: Positive; keratin, desmin, S-100, ER, PR: Negative	NS	Infiltrative	NS	NS	NS	(38)
Torres et al (2000)	14	6	-	-	-	Local Excision	-	+; 13 months	Wide Local Excision + Chemotherapy; Wide Local Excision + Radiotherapy 50 Gy; Vulvectomy + Hysterectomy + Radiotherapy 65 Gy	22 Years, alive, NED	(13)
Rubin and Fletcher (2000)	26	1.2	6	Yes, <50%	SMA, desmin: Positive; Cam52, EMA: Negative	Local Excision	Infiltrative	8 months & 35 months	NS	62 months, NED	(57)
Rubin and Fletcher (2000)	30	ND	5	No	SMA, HHF: Positive; desmin, Cam52, EMA: Negative	Local Excision	NS	19 months	NS	11 years: 39 Local Recurrences, died of disease	(57)
Rubin and Fletcher (2000)	32	2	10	No	SMA, desmin: Positive; Cam52, EMA: Negative	Wide Local Excision	NS	-	-	83 months, alive, NED	(57)
Lösch et al (2001)	38	-	-	-	ER, PR, Ki-67: Positive; p53: Negative	-	-	-	-	24 months, alive, NED	(22)
Di Gilio et al (2004)	36	6	2	NS	-	Wide Local Excision + Ipsilateral Lymphadenectomy	NS	-	-	30 months, alive, NED	(10)
Dewdney et al (2005)	36	5	-	-	-	Vulvectomy	-	-	-	13 months, alive, NED	(3)
Rewal et al (2005)	81	5	35-40	Yes	SMA: Positive	Wide Local Excision	NS	9 months	-	Died of unrelated cause (cardiac failure)	(28)
Shankar et al (2006)	58	3	NS	NS	Actin, desmin: Positive	Wide Local Excision	NS	-	-	42 months, alive, NED	(11)
González-Bugatto et al (2009)	52	6	21	No	SMA, Vimentin, Desmin, ER, PR: Positive; S-100, CK, CD31, p53, c-erbB-2, Leukocyte Common Antigen: Negative	Hemivulvectomy + ipsilateral lympadenectomy + radiotherapy 66.6 Gy + chemotherapy	Yes	+; 12 months	Wide local excision	4 years, alive, NED	(12)
Salehin et al (2011)	71	2	10	NS	SMA, Ki-67: Positive	Hemivulvectomy + hysterectomy + salpingo- oophorectomy + inguinal lymphadenectomy	No	NS	NS	NS	(4)
Mowers et al (2014)	48	4 & 10 (5 years later)	NS	NS	SMA, desmin, ER, PR: Positive	Incision and drainage	Infiltrative	+; 5 years	Partial excision and marsupialization; Left radical Hemivulvectomy + hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo- oophorectomy + chemotherapy	18 months, alive, NED	(26)
Levy et al (2014)	57	2.5	16	NS	SMA: Positive; Desmin: Positive	Local excision + Radical excision	Infiltrative - Then, no residual disease	NS	NS	NS	(16)
Teramae et al (2014)	51	13.5	7-10	NS	Desmin, Ki-67: Positive	Local excision	No	-	-	32 months, alive, NED	(44)
Alnafisah and Alfieri (2016)	37	5	NS	NS	SMA, ER, PR: Positive	Wide local excision + Chemotherapy; Left radical vulvectomy + ipsilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy	Residual disease	15 months	Left hemivulvectomy + ipsilateral iliac, inferior epigasric and obturator lymphadenectomy	Lung metastatic disease	(14)
Korkmaz et al (2016)	65	6	20	Yes	Calponin, Ki-67: Positive; S-100: Negative	Local Excision	NS	NS	-	6 months, alive, NED	(7)
Sayeed et al (2018)	72	11	8	Yes	-	Wide local excision	Infiltrative	NS*	NS*	aDied of disease	(58)
Sayeed et al (2018)	56	13.5	34	Yes	-	Wide local excision	Infiltrative	NS*	NS*	aDied of disease	(58)
Sayeed et al (2018)	68	5.5	23	Yes	-	Wide local excision	No	NS*	NS*	aDied of disease	(58)
Nath et al (2019)	38	8	4-5	Yes	SMA, vimentin: Positive; CK, desmin, S-100, HMB-45, CD34, ER, PR: Negative	Wide local excision	-	-	-	21 months, alive, NED	(9)
Sameeta et al, (2019)	63	2.1	25	No	SMA, desmin, ER: Positive; S-100, cytokeratin AE1/AE3: Negative	Wide local excision + radiotherapy	Infiltrative (focal)	NS	NS	NS	(59)
Saquib et al (2020)	63	2.8	22	Yes- Focal	SMA, desmin, caldesmon, Ki-67: Positive; CD117, CD4, vimentin, S100: Negative	Local excision; ipsilateral lymphadenectomy + ipsilateral hemivul- vectomy	Infiltrative (focal); Negative: After the second operation	-	-	NS	(60)
Smith et al (2020)	46	3	NS	NS	SMA, desmin: Positive; cytokeratin AE1/AE3, p40, S100, myogenin, myo-D1, caldesmon, CD34, STAT-6, TLE1: Negative	Local excision; ipsilateral partial radical vulvectomy; posterior radical vulvectomy, bilateral inguino-femoral lympadenectomy	Yes; after 3 operations: Negative	NS	NS	NS	(61)
Swanson et al (2020)	80	5.2	12	Yes	NS	Resection + chemotherapy	No	NS	NS	Liver metastasis at the time of resection	(62)
Swanson et al (2020)	NS	9.7	36	No	SMA: Diffusely positive; h-Caldesmon: Multifocally positive; Desmine: Negative	Resection	Infiltrative	NS	NS	NS	(62)
Swanson et al (2020)	NS	2.5	12	No	Desmin, h-Caldesmon and SMA: Diffusely positive; S100 protein: Negative	Resection	Infiltrative	NS	NS	NS	(62)
Akrivi et al (present case)	42	6.5	8-10	No	Desmin, Caldesmon, Vimentin, SMA, ER, PR: Positive; S100, myoglobulin, Keratin-116, CD117, CD34, CD31: Negative	Wide local excision	Focally infiltrative margin	No	Wide local Excision	53 months, alive, NED	-

[i] MFI, Mitotic figure index per ten high power fields; MTCN, Microscopic tumor cell necrosis; IHC, immunohistochemistry; NED, no evidence of disease; NS, not specified;

[ii] ^aIn the study by Saveed et al metastasis to lung occurred in 2 cases, at 1 and 36 months, respectively, and in the 3rd case occurred extensive local reccurence of the pelvis at 41 months. One patient was treated with adjuvant radiotherapy after recurrence and 2 patients were treated with chemotherapy after lung metastasis. All of the three patients died of the disease at 4, 36 and 56 months.

In conclusions, any vulvar lesion with unusual characteristics in the Bartholin's gland area should be carefully evaluated. Vulvar leiomyosarcomas localized in the Bartholin's gland area could masquerade as chronic Bartholin's gland abscess or as a benign lesion. For vulvar leiomyosarcomas, a wide local excision of the mass with free surgical margins should be a good option of surgery. This is particularly important to perform an effective surgery in cases with these extremely rare neoplasms to avoid recurrences and distal metastases. In case of recurrence, a new extensive surgical resection of the lesion with ipsilateral lympadenectomy and radiotherapy are suggested. Chemotherapy is given in cases of distal metastases.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

CA, ZA, CP, AV were involved treated the patient. SA, MV, ZA, CP, AV, EB, CA, conceived and designed this case report. SA, MV, ZA, CP, AV, VKV, FNV, EB, CA, wrote the initial draft of the report. SA, ZA, CP, AV, EB, CA, collected the clinical data. EB performed histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis and provided the related images. CA, ZA and EB were responsible for confirming the assessment of the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

The patient gave written informed consent for publication of the case details and associated images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References