AXL upregulates c‑Myc expression through AKT and ERK signaling pathways in breast cancers
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 8, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2618
- Article Number: 22
Abstract
Introduction
AXL is a member of the TAM (Tyro3, AXL, Mer) family of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and is activated by its ligand Gas6, which leads to activation of several downstream signaling pathways, depending on the cell types, mainly phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK). AXL has also been implicated in the pathophysiology of numerous cancers including breast, gastric, prostate, ovarian and lung (1-4). It enhances cancer cell survival, angiogenesis, metastasis and drug-resistance (2,4,5).
c-MYC is a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper transcription factor that dimerizes with MAX to bind DNA and regulate gene expression (6). c-Myc plays an essential role in cell cycle progression (7-9), cellular differentiation (10), metabolism (11), cancer progression (12) and drug resistance (13).
More than 1 million new breast cancer (BC) cases are diagnosed each year worldwide and account for most cancer-related deaths in women (14). Among BCs, some basal-like BCs are estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative and HER2 negative, causing triple-negative BC (TNBC), which accounts for 10-20% of all BC cases. These tumors are aggressive with poor prognosis due to ineffective target therapies.
In BC, 30-50% of tumors overexpress c-MYC (15), and it is considered that c-Myc is an enhancer of tumorigenesis in BC. Notably, c-MYC is elevated in TNBC compared with other cancer subtypes (ER+ (estrogen receptor alpha positive), HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive) (16).
AXL has been reported to be overexpressed in BC, and is a negative prognostic indicator for survival in patients with BC (17). AXL is also an inducer of Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-induced downstream effector, that is required for BC metastasis and progression (1,18). AXL also mediates BC cells resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapies (19). Thus, AXL represents a promising target in BC therapies (20).
Based on the observation that both c-Myc and AXL overexpressed in TNBC, it was hypothesized that as a receptor tyrosine receptor, AXL maybe regulate c-Myc expression in BC. It was revealed that AXL could upregulate c-Myc expression in an AKT- and ERK-dependent manner.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and reagents
293T cells, HeLa cells, MDA-MB-231 cells were purchased from The Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. 293T cells, HeLa cells, MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Zhejiang Tianhang Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). MCF7 cells were purchased from Procell Life Science & Technology and cultured in MEM medium (cat. no. PM150410; Procell Life Science & Technology) supplemented with 0.01 mg/ml insulin (cat. no. PB180432; Procell Life Science & Technology) and 10% FBS (cat. no. 164210-500; Procell Life Science & Technology). All the cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere at 37˚C with 5% CO2. Cell line authentication was achieved by genetic profiling using the polymorphic short tandem repeat (STR) method at the Forensic Science Center, Jining Medical University (Shandong, China). R428 was purchased from MedChemExpress and used as previously described (21). LY294002 and U0126 were purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology.
Western blotting
Total cellular proteins were extracted from cells with RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (all from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), and the quantity was determined by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Then 10 µg proteins were subjected to 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The membrane was blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5% non-fat milk solution and incubated overnight at 4˚C with the following primary antibodies: AXL (1:1,000; cat. no. 8661), phosphorylated (p)-AKT (1:1,000; cat. no. 4060), AKT (cat. no. 4691; all from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), ERK1 + ERK2 (1:10,000; cat. no. ab184699), p-ERK1 + ERK2 (1:10,000; cat. no. ab76299; both from Abcam) and c-Myc antibody (1:1,000; cat. no. ab32072; Abcam). Following incubation with primary antibodies, membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (cat. no. ZB-2301) or goat anti-mouse (cat. no. ZB-2305; both from OriGene Technologies, Inc.) secondary antibodies (1:5,000) at room temperature for 1 h. Immunoblot bands were visualized using ECL reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). GAPDH (1:1,000; cat. no. TA-08; OriGene Technologies, Inc.) was included as an endogenous protein loading control.). All the experiments were repeated three times. ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, version 1.53m) was used for the densitometric analysis.
Nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction
Nuclear and cytoplasmic protein were extracted using nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction kit (cat. no. P0027) from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology according to the manufacturer's instructions. These experiments were repeated three times.
Plasmids, short hairpin (sh)RNA and transfection
AXL plasmid (cat. no. 105932) or AXL kinase-dead plasmid (cat. no. 105934; both from Addgene, Inc.) were gifts from Rosa Marina Melillo (22). Transfection of plasmids (AXL or empty vector) was performed using Lipo8000 (cat. no. C053; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, Lipo8000 and vector were incubated in DMEM without FBS for 5 min and added the cell medium for 4 h. ~44-48 h later, cells were harvested for analysis. Lentivirus for shRNA targeting AXL (shAXL-3) (5'-GGGTGACAATGTGGGAGATTG-3') and Control viruses (Cont; 5'-TTCTCCGACGTGTCACGT-3') were purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., and the titer for both of them was 109 TU/ml. For viral transfection, viruses (5 µl/ml) and polybrene (2 µg/ml) were added to the cell medium (MOI=~5 for HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells), after 3 days cells were treated with puromycin (2 µg/ml) for ~1 week to select transfected cells. Then, cells were cultured at puromycin (0.5 µg/ml) for maintenance.
Analysis of protein expression of AXL and c-Myc from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA)
TCPA is a resource for cancer functional proteomics data over a large number of tumor and cell line samples using reverse-phase protein arrays as a part of The Cancer Genome Atlas Project (23). To analyze the association between AXL and c-Myc in BCs, their protein expression data was downloaded from TCPA (n=901) (https://www.tcpaportal.org/tcpa/download.html). The samples whose AXL expression marked with NA (n=156) were excluded. The expression association between AXL and c-Myc was analyzed by SPSS (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc.) using Pearson's correlation analysis (n=745). To further analyze the samples without c-Myc amplification, data of c-Myc amplification of the samples were extracted from cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/). After excluding these samples with c-Myc amplification, the expression association between AXL and c-Myc was analyzed by SPSS using Pearson's correlation analysis (n=648).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences between experimental and control groups were analyzed using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test (2 groups) or a one-way ANOVA (>2 groups) followed by a multiple post hoc comparisons test (Dunnett's test) using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
AXL increases c-Myc expression
To determine the association of AXL and c-Myc, AXL was overexpressed in MCF7 and 293T cells which did not express AXL, and it was revealed that exogenous AXL increased c-Myc expression (Fig. 1A and B). Furthermore, c-Myc expression was revealed to be dependent on AXL amount transfected; increasing AXL transfection led to elevated c-Myc expression (Fig. 1C and D). c-Myc is located in the nucleus, therefore the expression of cytoplasmic and nuclear c-Myc was explored. It was identified that nuclear c-Myc was upregulated in response to AXL overexpression (Fig. 1E). The present results also showed a part of AXL was also located in the nucleus, which was consistent with previous results (24).
To further determine the association between AXL and c-Myc, AXL expression was knocked down in two AXL-high expression cell lines, HeLa and MDA-MB-231. AXL knockdown using shRNA decreased c-Myc expression in both cell lines (Fig. 2A and B). Re-overexpression of AXL in shRNA-knockdown HeLa and MDA-MB-231 recovered c-Myc expression (Fig. 2C and D). R428, a selective AXL inhibitor (25), suppressed c-Myc expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2E and F). Thus, it was concluded that AXL could increase c-Myc expression.
AXL increases c-Myc expression through AKT and ERK pathway
AKT and ERK are the main downstream signaling pathways of AXL (4,26). It was observed that overexpression of AXL is accompanied by activation of AKT and ERK pathways, which are manifested by p-AKT and p-ERK, respectively (Fig. 1C and D). Thus, to understand the mechanisms underlying AXL-upregulated c-Myc, MDA-MB-231 cells were first treated with AKT and ERK inhibitors LY294002 and U0126, respectively, and it was revealed that LY294002 and U0126 suppressed the activation of AKT and ERK, respectively (Fig. 3A and B). Moreover, both inhibitors suppressed c-Myc expression in a time-dependent manner, suggesting that both pathways are important in maintaining c-Myc expression (Fig. 3A and B). Subsequently, it was investigated whether both signaling pathways are involved in AXL-upregulated c-Myc. Overexpression of AXL led to c-Myc upregulation; however, overexpression of kinase-dead AXL (K567R) did not increase c-Myc expression as markedly as AXL. AXL activated AKT and ERK signaling while AXL-KD activated AKT weakly and did not activate ERK signaling (Fig. 3C and D). These results suggested both AKT and ERK signaling are important for c-Myc upregulation by AXL.
AXL is associated with c-Myc expression in patients with BC
To further study the association between AXL and c-Myc, protein expression data from patients with BC of TCPA (23) was examined. It was revealed that there is a trend association between AXL and c-Myc (P=0.059) (Fig. 4). In BCs, c-Myc protein expression was closely correlated with c-Myc amplification (27), suggesting a subset of c-Myc overexpression is caused by c-Myc amplification, and it was hypothesized that c-Myc in this part of tumors was more dependent on amplification but not signaling pathways. Indeed, when this subset of samples was excluded, AXL and c-Myc were associated with each other significantly (P=0.020) (Fig. 4).
Discussion
c-Myc is now known to be one of the most frequently dysregulated oncogenes. It is overexpressed by different mechanisms in 60-70% of human solid and hematopoietic tumors (7,11,12). It was found in a pan-cancer copy-number analysis to be the third most amplified gene in human cancers (11). Besides copy-number amplification, numerous dysregulated signaling pathways also contribute to the overexpression of c-Myc, such as Wnt-APC pathway found in human colon carcinoma (28) and NOTCH signaling pathway found in T cell leukemia (29). c-MYC contributes to the genesis of numerous human cancers. It has been revealed to be linked to numerous key biological processes of cancer cells including proliferation, stem cell properties, metabolism, metastasis, cancer immune and genome instability (11,12,30).
In the present study, a new mechanism of c-Myc overexpression in BC cells was demonstrated, in which AXL upregulates c-Myc expression through the AKT and ERK signaling pathways. The results are in accordance with those of Hong et al (13), which displayed a close association between AXL and c-Myc in esophageal adenocarcinoma.
In the present study, to the best of our knowledge, exogeneous AXL was first overexpressed in 293T and MCF7 cells, both of which do not express AXL. As a result, c-Myc expression was upregulated in a dose-dependent manner. Conversely, knockdown of AXL expression in MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cells decreased c-Myc expression. Furthermore, R428, a selective AXL inhibitor, also suppressed c-Myc expression. Collectively, these results supported a role of AXL in c-Myc upregulation in BC cells. Furthermore, the association between AXL and c-Myc was supported by data from tumor tissues of patients with BC. To understand the mechanism underlying c-Myc upregulation by AXL, the AKT and ERK pathways were examined. It was revealed that both of the two pathways are important for c-Myc upregulation by AXL. Nevertheless, the detailed mechanisms must be further studied. These experiments were not performed, which is a limitation to the present study.
In conclusion, in the present study, it was demonstrated that AXL upregulates c-MYC expression through activation of the AKT and ERK signaling in BC cells.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: The present study was supported by innovation and entrepreneurship training program for college students of Jining Medical University (grant no. cx2021138), the Enterprise Technology Innovation Project of Jinan (grant no. 201940901085) and the Project of Medicine and Health Development Plan of Shandong (grant no. 2019WS176).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
GZ, HoZ and QG designed the study. XS, HC, SY, ZT, ZW, FL, WH and HaZ performed the experiments and analyzed the data. GZ, QG and HoZ prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. HoZ and QG confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Paccez JD, Vogelsang M, Parker MI and Zerbini LF: The receptor tyrosine kinase Axl in cancer: Biological functions and therapeutic implications. Int J Cancer. 134:1024–1033. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Graham DK, DeRyckere D, Davies KD and Earp HS: The TAM family: Phosphatidylserine sensing receptor tyrosine kinases gone awry in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 14:769–785. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Qu X, Liu G, Zhong X, Li X and Zhang Q: Role of AXL expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 12:5085–5091. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang G, Wang M, Zhao H and Cui W: Function of Axl receptor tyrosine kinase in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 15:2726–2734. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang Z, Lee JC, Lin L, Olivas V, Au V, LaFramboise T, Abdel-Rahman M, Wang X, Levine AD, Rho JK, et al: Activation of the AXL kinase causes resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy in lung cancer. Nat Genet. 44:852–860. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Conacci-Sorrell M, McFerrin L and Eisenman RN: An overview of MYC and its interactome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 4(a014357)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
García-Gutiérrez L, Delgado MD and León J: MYC oncogene contributions to release of cell cycle brakes. Genes (Basel). 10(244)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bretones G, Delgado MD and León J: Myc and cell cycle control. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1849:506–516. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Singh AM and Dalton S: The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. 5:141–149. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gómez-Casares MT, García-Alegria E, López-Jorge CE, Ferrándiz N, Blanco R, Alvarez S, Vaqué JP, Bretones G, Caraballo JM, Sánchez-Bailón P, et al: MYC antagonizes the differentiation induced by imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia cells through downregulation of p27(KIP1.). Oncogene. 32:2239–2246. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stine ZE, Walton ZE, Altman BJ, Hsieh AL and Dang CV: MYC, metabolism, and cancer. Cancer Discov. 5:1024–1039. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dang CV: MYC on the path to cancer. Cell. 149:22–35. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hong J, Maacha S and Belkhiri A: Transcriptional upregulation of c-MYC by AXL confers epirubicin resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Mol Oncol. 12:2191–2208. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Padayachee J, Daniels A, Balgobind A, Ariatti M and Singh M: HER-2/neu and MYC gene silencing in breast cancer: Therapeutic potential and advancement in nonviral nanocarrier systems. Nanomedicine (Lond). 15:1437–1452. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 490:61–70. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gjerdrum C, Tiron C, Hoiby T, Stefansson I, Haugen H, Sandal T, Collett K, Li S, McCormack E, Gjertsen BT, et al: Axl is an essential epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-induced regulator of breast cancer metastasis and patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:1124–1129. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chang H, An R, Li X, Lang X, Feng J and Lv M: Anti-Axl monoclonal antibodies attenuate the migration of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 22(749)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Meyer AS, Miller MA, Gertler FB and Lauffenburger DA: The receptor AXL Diversifies EGFR signaling and limits the response to EGFR-Targeted inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Sci Signal. 6(ra66)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Khera L and Lev S: Accelerating AXL targeting for TNBC therapy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 139(106057)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Han S, Wang Y, Ge C, Gao M, Wang X, Wang F, Sun L, Li S, Dong T, Dang Z, et al: Pharmaceutical inhibition of AXL suppresses tumor growth and invasion of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 20(41)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Avilla E, Guarino V, Visciano C, Liotti F, Svelto M, Krishnamoorthy G, Franco R and Melillo RM: Activation of TYRO3/AXL tyrosine kinase receptors in thyroid cancer. Cancer Res. 71:1792–1804. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li J, Lu Y, Akbani R, Ju Z, Roebuck PL, Liu W, Yang JY, Broom BM, Verhaak RG, Kane DW, et al: TCPA: A resource for cancer functional proteomics data. Nat Methods. 10:1046–1047. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Brand TM, Iida M, Corrigan KL, Braverman CM, Coan JP, Flanigan BG, Stein AP, Salgia R, Rolff J, Kimple RJ and Wheeler DL: The receptor tyrosine kinase AXL mediates nuclear translocation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Sci Signal. 10(eaag1064)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Holland SJ, Pan A, Franci C, Hu Y, Chang B, Li W, Duan M, Torneros A, Yu J, Heckrodt TJ, et al: R428, a selective small molecule inhibitor of Axl kinase, blocks tumor spread and prolongs survival in models of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 70:1544–1554. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Linger RM, Keating AK, Earp HS and Graham DK: TAM receptor tyrosine kinases: Biologic functions, signaling, and potential therapeutic targeting in human cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 100:35–83. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Blancato J, Singh B, Liu A, Liao DJ and Dickson RB: Correlation of amplification and overexpression of the c-myc oncogene in high-grade breast cancer: FISH, in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical analyses. Br J Cancer. 90:1612–1619. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, Hermeking H, Zawel L, da Costa LT, Morin PJ, Vogelstein B and Kinzler KW: Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science. 281:1509–1512. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Palomero T, Lim WK, Odom DT, Sulis ML, Real PJ, Margolin A, Barnes KC, O'Neil J, Neuberg D, Weng AP, et al: NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:18261–18266. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Casey SC, Baylot V and Felsher DW: The MYC oncogene is a global regulator of the immune response. Blood. 131:2007–2015. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |