Open Access

The role of microalgal extracts and their combination with tamoxifen in the modulation of breast cancer immunotherapy (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Omar Mahmoud Al-Shajrawi
    • Ibraheam A.M. Tarawneh
    • Tengku Ahmad Damitri Al Astani Damitri Al Astani Tengku Din
    • Hafeez Abiola Afolabi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 1, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2024.2801
  • Article Number: 6
  • Copyright: © Al-Shajrawi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Cancer is one of the deadliest health menaces humans have ever witnessed. It is a leading cause of human mortality. Today, it remains a main leading cause of death globally primarily due to lifestyle changes and population ageing. A total of ~12.7 million cancer cases and 7.6 million cancer deaths were reported in 2008. In developing countries, cancer accounted for 56% of cases and 64% of deaths. Tamoxifen is the most reputable and recommended specific oestrogen receptor modulator drug used for the treatment of breast cancer. In the past decade, algae have demonstrated remarkable potency for advanced life applications. They can remain a focus of interest in the coming decades because they are one of the most diverse organisms in the entire ecosystem with immense bio nutritional benefits. Algae and their extracts play a pivotal role in the pharmaceutical industry as bioactive compounds and new drugs and nutraceutical industry as probiotics and antioxidants. However, a broad range of the health benefits of these organisms remains to be explored. The present review highlights the applications and co‑application of microalgal crude extracts with tamoxifen for breast cancer immunotherapy. Given that recent studies have suggested that tamoxifen is an essential and primary treatment for breast cancer, the present review focused on the identification of a new treatment approach involving the co‑application of tamoxifen and microalgal extracts to provide promising anticancer activity with few side effects on normal cells. The present review includes a general background and blueprint for the use of microalgal extracts as potential and affordable treatments or adjuncts for breast cancer management.

1. Introduction

Cancer incidence. Globally, cancer is amongst the most prevalent diseases and the second most common cause of mortality after cardiovascular diseases likely due to changing lifestyles, genetics and population ageing. In 2008, 12.7 million cancer cases and 7.6 million cancer deaths were reported worldwide, of which 56 and 64% were reported in developing countries, respectively (1). Between 2007 and 2008, 23% of the 500,000 deaths reported in the United States were cancer-related (2). Leukaemia is the most common cause of death amongst those <40 years old, whereas lung cancer is the most common cause of death amongst those aged ≥40(3). The most common cancer amongst women is breast cancer, which is most prevalent amongst women in the age group of 20-59 years-old, whereas leukaemia and lung cancers are common in age groups <20 and >60 years old, respectively. Globally, breast cancer accounts for 23% of all reported cancer cases and is responsible for 14% of all cancer-related deaths in women worldwide (the highest amongst cancer-related deaths) (4).

Several risk factors for breast cancer have been extensively investigated and commonly include early menarche age, late menopausal age, short breastfeeding sessions, late-early-full-term pregnancy, nulliparity and low parity (5). However, studies have been conducted mainly in developed countries in the Western world. Although a handful of studies in Asia have reported similar findings as those in the West, they were primarily conducted in cities and urban areas wherein lifestyles are somewhat comparable to Western lifestyles; therefore, they not represent a considerable part of the Asian population (6,7). Hence, an extensive and all-inclusive study with a large sample size is warranted to determine whether risk factors play the same role amongst Asian populations in third-world countries as those in the West. Such data will substantially contribute to a suitable strategic approach for improving breast cancer awareness and management in Asia (8).

Cancer is an unregulated proliferation of cells leading to excessive cell division (9). The growth stages of cancer cells from normal to malignant are demonstrated in Fig. 1. Cancer cells exhibit six essential changes in their physiology that lead to progression and metastasis: i) Insensitivity to growth-inhibiting signals; ii) self-sufficiency in the presence of various growth signals; iii) limitless replicative potential; iv) tissue invasion and metastasis; v) sustained angiogenesis; and vi) evasion of programmed cell death (apoptosis) (10,11). Cancer can be divided into carcinomas, lymphomas, sarcomas and leukaemia. Carcinomas are the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the skin, lungs, pancreas, breasts and in other different organs or glands (12,13). Lymphomas are related to the lymphocytes of the body's immune system, and sarcomas arise from muscle, bone, cartilage, or fat and are uncommon cancer types (14). Leukaemia is the cancer of the blood, bone marrow and bone; metastasis is the distribution and growth of cancer in different locations or organs in the body (15). The stages of development common to almost all cancer types are illustrated in Fig. 1. Firstly, the cancer starts in the innermost lining (stage 1). Later, the cancer moves to the inner wall of tissue and then distributes outside tissue to the nearest tissues (extravasation) but not to the lymph nodes (stage 2). It then spreads specifically to the closest lymph nodes; however, not to other parts of the body (stage 3). Finally, the cancer metastasises to other vital organs of the body, such as the lungs and liver (stage 4) (16).

Breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide (17). The age-adjusted breast cancer incidence in Malaysia is 47.4/100,000, which is ~50% of that in North America. The Chinese have the highest incidence of breast cancer (59.9/100,000), followed by Indians (54.2/100,000) and Malays (34.9/100,000) (18). The estimated incidence and death rates of all cancer types and breast cancer worldwide in 2020 as reported by the WHO is demonstrated in Fig. 2.

According to GLOBOCAN 2012, breast cancer is the second most prevalent cancer and fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with an age-standardised incidence rate of 43.3 per 100,000 women per year and a worldwide mortality rate of 12.9% in 2012 (19,20). In the USA, the cancer mortality rate decreased by 1.8% per year in male patients and by 1.6% in female patients between 2004 and 2008, and the age-standardised cancer death rate reduced by 1.5% (175.8 per 100,000). The cancer incidence rates in men (by 0.6% per year) are declining as a result of medical development and health care, whereas those in women have remained the same. Between 1990 and 2008, the cancer-related death rate decreased by ~22.9% in male patients and 15% in female patients (21,22).

In 2016, the global cancer prevalence ranged from 0.2-2% and was roughly similar as reported in numerous previous studies, which revealed that breast cancer had the highest incidence amongst all cancers in the world (~0.12%) with a total of 8.16 million cases (23,24). Between 2008 and 2017, breast cancer prevalence rates worldwide increased by 20% (25). In 2002, the AVON Breast Cancer Foundation reported that >39,600 breast cancer-related deaths occurred in a population of American women (26). Furthermore, in 2018, breast cancer was reported to be the second most widespread cancer in the world, accounting for 2 million cases, and the most predominant cancer in women (27).

In Malaysia, breast cancer is an important cause of death amongst the population regardless of the sex; however, is more prominent in women than in men (28). Colorectal cancer is more dominant in male patients than in female patients (29). Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the Malaysian population and second most common cancer amongst male patients; it is responsible for 29% of cancer-related deaths in men and 26% of all cancer-related deaths in women worldwide (30). The National Cancer Registry (NCR) reported data upholding the latter finding. Specifically, data from the NCR revealed that >2,000 reported cases of lung cancer exhibited male predisposition with the M:F ratio of 1,445:603. Lung, prostate, bronchus and colorectal cancers accounted for the highest proportion of cancer-related deaths amongst both sexes. In terms of predisposition, the most prominent cancers amongst female patients are breast, lung, bronchus and colorectal cancers, whereas those amongst male patients are lung, prostate, bronchus and colorectal cancers (31).

Cancer treatment pathways

Chemotherapy and surgery are the most common therapies for cancer. However, chemotherapeutic agents are associated with several side effects, including digestive problems, DNA damage, hair loss, non-specific targets and leukopenia. Moreover, the development of drug resistance decreases the efficiency of drugs in chemotherapy (32-34). Anticancer therapeutic pathways work through numerous mechanisms of action. They include invasion, metastasis, induction of apoptosis in cancer cells and inhibition of cancer cell growth (35). Apoptosis may be initiated by a mitochondrial-mediated (intrinsic) pathway or by a death receptor-mediated (extrinsic) pathway (36,37); each of these strategies involves the activation of caspases (38).

Numerous cancer therapies that have been developed have been associated with intrinsic drug resistance, which reduces the likelihood that patients with cancer will have promising survival times. Amongst all cancer mechanisms, genetic alterations or aberrations have been designated as the primary culprit in cancer development and metastasis (39). Radiotherapy and anticancer agents/drugs may target various signalling pathways in the cell cycle. This effect activates the apoptotic machinery (programmed cell death) of cancer cells towards cell survival pathways (40). The ratios and percentages of survival and apoptotic pathways result in the overall efficacy of anticancer therapy and are all activated by therapeutic agents (41). In cancer cells, caspases result in apoptosis by inducing caspase-cascade signals. Proapoptotic proteins/enzymes, such as caspases 8, 9 and 3, may be downregulated in various malignancies (42).

A protein known as TP53 contains tumour protein P53, a tumour-suppressor gene. Its primary function in cell cycle transitions involves regulating and managing damage reactions (DNA damage detection) and apoptosis (43). The association between P53 and drug resistance has been thoroughly investigated in several clinical trials and studies, and most works have established strong associations between P53 variants and chemoresistance, especially in ovarian and lung carcinomas (44). However, a solution to these issues has yet to be found due to the multifactorial characteristics of symptoms.

Protein kinase B (PKB), also known as AKT, is present in a broad range of cancers and plays a vital role in cancer progression along with downstream receptors that control cancer cell progression (45,46). AKT prevents apoptosis by inactivating numerous proapoptotic factors, such as mammalian rapamycin target, the Bcl-2-associated death promoter Poor and caspase-9, hence contributing to cancer cell survival and progression (47). Tumour metastasis is another complicated process involving: i) The detachment of cells from the primary tumour, (ii) invasion into the surrounding normal tissue, (iii) further intravasation into the blood circulatory system and (iv) extravasation and growth in other organs. The cytoskeleton plays a crucial role in promoting the colonisation of metastatic tumour cells. Rho GTPases are one of the important families of GTPases, which regulate the actin cytoskeleton 12; Rho enhances tumour cell metastasis by increasing cell movement (16).

Natural products from microalgae

Algae are organisms that can perform photosynthetic activity; worldwide, they naturally grow in freshwater and wastewater environments that are mainly located near the sea (48). They have the potential for advanced life applications, at least in the coming five decades, because they are one of the most diverse groups of organisms in the ecosystem; their roles depend on their supply and demand, as well as technology (49). Although algae and their extracts are being extensively used in the pharmaceutical industry as bioactive compounds and new drugs and in the nutraceutical industry as probiotics and antioxidants, they have not yet not been explored entirely and may have several applications that require investigation (48).

Algae can be classified into different sizes on the basis of their natural visualisation. Macroalgae can be visualised naturally (for example, seaweeds), whereas microalgae require microscopy aids to be visualised (48). Microalgae contain vitamins, amino acids, proteins, pigments, polyunsaturated fatty acids, minerals and antioxidants. They possess a wide range of biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral, antiallergy and antitumoral activities (50,51). They have also been found to exhibit antibacterial, antifungal and antineoplastic properties (52). Marine algae can decrease the risk of cancer because they may exert potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and are rich in dietary fibre (53). The role of marine microalgae in anticancerous activity may reduce the dangerous side effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapeutic drugs (51).

As aforementioned, microalgae are photosynthetic and can produce hydrocarbons and lipids through the consumption of carbon dioxide and solar energy, thus behaving as a source of energy for the environmental ecosystem (54). They contain various components that could be utilised for human health and provide protection against chronic diseases (55). Microalgae have been described as a rich source of carbon. Therefore, they have a wide range of applications, including pharmaceuticals, health supplements, cosmetics and biofuels (56). They have also been employed in wastewater remediation (57). Microalgae produce several high-value products (HVPs), such as food, agar, alginates, carotenoids, fatty acids and pigments, which are beneficial for wild and marine creatures and have several applications in the pharmaceutical, industrial and nutraceutical sectors. They contain long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as omega-3 and omega-6, which are beneficial for the cardiac and neurological development of the human body (58). Spirulina and Chlorella species are leading the worldwide microalgae market because they are gaining acceptance in food and health-related supermarkets and stores (48). Compared with traditional protein sources, such as fish, eggs and soybean, microalgae provide more substantial contributions to protein supply, making them an improved source of natural protein in terms of quality and quantity (48).

Microalgae are classified into four main groups on the basis of their colours: Green (chlorophytes), red (rhodophytes), blue green (cyanobacteria) and other colours (chromophytes) (48). Each group consists of hundreds of species, and every species has thousands of strains (59). The carotenoids, polysaccharides and sterols obtained from marine microalgae are natural sources of drugs. They exhibit potential anticancer activities against different cancer types, as illustrated in Table I (60). Microalgae are the primary source of various valuable products, such as fibre, enzymes, protein, oil, carbohydrates and minerals (calcium, magnesium, iron, potassium and iodine) and are considered as nutritional supplements and health products for humans (61). They also have a remarkable vitamin content. Land-grown vegetables lack vitamin B12, whereas microalgae are a valuable source of this vitamin, along with vitamins C, B1 and B2(62).

Table I

Microalgal pharmaceutical significance.

Table I

Microalgal pharmaceutical significance.

First author/s, year'DiseaseType of microalgaeCompositionSignificance(Refs.)
Cha et al, 2008Colon carcinomaChlorella ellipsoideaCarotenoid extractSignificant(66)
Kusaikin et al, 2010Colorectal adenocarcinomaSynedra acusPolysaccharideRevealed a dose-time dependent trend(67)
Pasquet et al, 2011Breast cancerDunaliella tertiolectaViolaxanthinApoptosis induction in MCF-7 cells(68)
Erfani et al, 2015Breast adenocarcinomaCladophoropsis sp.Ethanol extractHas high cytotoxic effects(69)
Srivastava et al, 1988Skin melanomaAmphidinium carteraeHexane fractionPrognostic significance in intermediate thickness melanomas(70)
Kim et al, 2014Liver hepatocellular carcinomaNavicula incertaStigmasterol (phytosterol)Revealed potent apoptosis inductive effects(71)

Asia, Australia and the USA were the first to start the production of microalgae in the 1980s (63). Previous technological advancements and progress in biotechnology have enabled the production of high-value nutrients, such as fatty acids, phycobilin, carotenoids, polysaccharides, poly-hydroxy-alkanoates and sterols, from microalgae through the management of culture systems (64). Microalgae could survive in aquatic and non-aquatic ecosystems (65) and tolerate a wide range of parameters; for example, temperature, salinity and pH. Microalgal bioactive components play an essential role in disease-inhibiting and health-promoting products. The pharmaceutical value of microalgae is revealed in Table I.

2. Applications of microalgae

Algae have been used as a source of food and therapeutics for different illnesses in Japan, Taiwan, China and Australia for ≥2,000 years (48). Historically, microalgae have supplied nutrients to humans; for example, Nostoc, a genus of cyanobacteria, has been consumed by the Chinese for 20 centuries (66). The microalgal environment is surrounded by various factors that contribute to the production of numerous compounds, such as carbohydrates, lipids, proteins and other secondary metabolites of medicinal value (67). The most common algal products include hydrocolloids, carotenoids and polyunsaturated fatty acids and have wide applications in food, feed, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and chemicals (48).

The global application of alga-based products in different sectors (for example, pharmaceuticals) has increased (68). Various products in the pharmaceutical industry are derived from microalgae and used as antiviral, antimicrobial and antifungal drugs and therapeutic proteins. The pharmaceutical products derived from microalgae include omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), β-carotene and astaxanthin (69). Algal products are categorised into three types on the basis of their market value, namely, high-, medium- and low-value products (48). Microalgae and cyanobacteria are marketable resources of HVPs (for example, β-carotene, astaxanthin, pigments and algal extracts), which are used in cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries (48).

EPA and DHA derived from algae participate in the inhibition of numerous diseases, including thrombosis, atherosclerosis and arthritis (48). Omega-3 and omega-6 are the two most important fatty acids extracted from microalgae (70), wherein they are found in high concentrations (48). In contrast to humans, the microalgal species Crypthecodinium, Thraustochytrium and Schizochytrium contain the omega-3 fatty acid DHA, and Phaeodactylum, Chlorella and Monodus contain EPA (48).

Astaxanthin is one of the most prominent and active carotenoid molecules present in various types of microalgae. It is the most abundant pigment in nature and isolated from microalgae through extraction (71). The global astaxanthin market has been estimated to be US $257 million (48). Aquaculture utilises the majority of astaxanthin produced from microalgae specifically in fish coloration. The market size of astaxanthin was last assessed in 2016 and found to be US $555.4 million (48). Astaxanthin is used in the salmon feed industry due to its antioxidant activity (48). It is produced commercially; however, it is distributed naturally in several different species of microalgae. It is most abundant in Hematococcus pluvialis. Astaxanthin has been used widely in the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries due to its antioxidant and fortification activities (72). β-Carotene is another molecule that is abundant in microalgae. It provides health benefits to humans because it is a favourable source of vitamin A and has antioxidant effects (59). The carotenoid content of most algae is 0.1-2%. However, Dunaliella, if cultured under the appropriate conditions of high salinity and light intensity, could yield up to 14% of β-carotene (73). The prospective product areas of algae include nutrient-rich food, bioenergy, bioactive medicine, novel enzymes, special chemicals, bio-fertilisers and bioremediation.

3. Microalgae types in the literature

Chlorella species are non-flagellate autotrophic green microalgae composed of single spherical cells with diameters of ~2-10 µm (73). They contain chlorophylls a and b in their chloroplasts, which help them in photosynthesis. They require CO2, water, sunlight and a small amount of minerals for rapid growth and can be grown commercially in large circular tanks, photobioreactors and ponds. Initially, Chlorella is grown indoors in small culture flasks and then inoculated into outdoor tanks and ponds for large-scale production. Chlorella is harvested through centrifugation or auto-flocculation; the harvested biomass is then dried, and the obtained powder is used for different purposes. Chlorella contains high amounts of various biologically active compounds and is also used as a source of food, feed and medicine. The biochemical composition of Chlorella is 11-58% protein, 12-28% carbohydrates and 2-46% lipids. Chlorella also contains various vitamins, such as provitamin A, β-carotene, vitamin E, thiamine B1, riboflavin B2, niacin B3, vitamin B6, inositol, vitamin B12, biotin, folic acid and pantothenic acid (74-77). Chlorella has been found to have favourable environmental remediation effects and bioenergy generation ability (51,78-80).

Microalgae are a reliable source of feedstock because of their broad accessibility and can be a favourable source of oil. A study investigated the calorific values of Chlorella strains, including four freshwater strains (Chlorella sorokiniana, Chlorella protothecoides, Chlorella emerson and Chlorella vulgaris) and one marine strain (C. minutissima) and suggested that Chlorella strains might be suitable for use as a diesel replacement (81). The utilisation of C. protothecoides as a biodiesel source (82,83).

The role of iron in microalgae growth has been reported in numerous studies. Through fluorescence methods and estimations assumed over 12 years, it was determined that iron has a prominent role in managing and directing phytoplankton biomass under high nitrate low-chlorophyll conditions and in oligotrophic waters close to the equator and further south (84,85). However, the response of some biochemical compounds, for example, lipids, in microalgae when the deficiency of ‘bioavailable’ iron is the primary factor restricting algal biomass production has rarely been reported (86,87). Nitzschia communis (88), Dunaliella (89), Botryococcus braunii (90) and the diatom Chaetoceros muelleri (91) were also found to be valuable biofuel sources. Previous investigations have revealed that the lipid content of microalgae might change under different conditions, such as fluctuating salinity (92), silicon deficiency (88), nitrogen deficiency (89), phosphate limitation (90) and excessive cadmium (91), and alternately co-immobilised over alginate globules by the bacterium Azospirillum brasilense (90,93). Dry biomass oil levels of 20-50% can be obtained and might reach 80%.

Chlorella strains have great potential to be used as a tool for biodiesel development because of their straightforward cultivation and fast growth. Under general growth conditions, the lipid content of Chlorella reaches ~14-30% by dry biomass weight (85,94), which cannot satisfy the commercial criteria for biodiesel output. As already stated, iron is the main factor in improving phytoplankton abundance in ocean waters. In addition, some cultivation conditions may increase lipid quantities. The effect of iron on the production and lipid composition of the marine strain C. vulgaris has been studied to determine whether iron may facilitate biomass productivity or lipid aggregation under laboratory conditions. Studies on microalgae and their associations are demonstrated in Table II. These studies demonstrated that the final cell density and lipid content of the marine strain C. vulgaris increased by introducing chelated iron into cultures in the late exponential growth stage and C. vulgaris increased considerably when its cells were reinoculated into new media with high iron concentrations (95).

Table II

Studies on microalgae and pharmaceutical significance.

Table II

Studies on microalgae and pharmaceutical significance.

First author/s, yearDiseaseMicroalgae type, extract or active compoundType of cell linesSignificance(Refs.)
Renju et al, 2014Prostate cancerChlorella marina carotenoids (lycopene), Dose 50 µMPC-3 cell lineSignificant(101)
Saad et al, 2006Liver cancerChlorella vulgaris Hot water extract, 1,600 µg/mlHepG2Significant(102)
Wu et al, 2005Liver fibrosisSpirulina and Chlorella water extractHepG2 and HSCs cellsSignificant(103)
Yusof 2010HepatomaHot water extract of Chlorella vulgaris 1.6 mg/mlHepG2 and WRL68 normal liver cellsThe anticancer mechanism of C. Vulgaris in hepatoma cells (HepG2) is by inhibiting DNA synthesis, triggering DNA damage and inducing apoptosis(104)
Pugh et al, 2001Immunosti mulatory activityPolysaccharides from Spirulina platensis (Immulina), Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (Immunon) and Chlorella pyrenoidosa (Immurella)THP-1 human monocytesMicroalgal polysaccharides have the main role in immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer and infectious diseases(105)
Jayshree et al, 2016Breast cancerC. vulgaris and C. reinhardtii methanol extractMCF-7Significant(106)
Cha et al, 2011Human colon cancerCarotenoids extracted from Chlorella ellipsoidea and Chlorella vulgarisHCT116xanthophylls of C. ellipsoidea significant and more effective than Chlorella vulgaris extracts(66)
Sedighi et al, 2016Breast cancerChlorella vulgaris peptides 50 mg/mlBreast cancer cellsSignificant(107)
Yasukawa et al, 1996Tumor promotion mouse skinSterols from Chlorella vulgarisIn vivo miceSignificant(108)

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme studied the autotrophic growth of microalgae. Autotrophic growth provides several benefits. For example, i) microalgae can convert and produce energy from the sun at the cost of inexpensive natural resources (for example, H2O and CO2) (96), leading to global CO2 reduction; and ii) microalgae may flourish in areas wherein salty water, excessive solar exposure and lack of vital nutrients prevent certain crops from developing (97,98). The concept of the autotrophic growth of microalgae for biodiesel development is fascinating, enticing and technically feasible. Nevertheless, this culture style makes achieving high microalgal biomass densities difficult because light absorption is inversely proportional to cell density (85). Cell coverage can also induce insufficiency, resulting in the low productivity of algal lipids and biomass (99). Additionally, the insufficient production of biomass often increases the cost of biomass processing (100,101).

Microalgae can be grown in heterotrophic systems for developing cost-effective algal oil production wherein organic compounds, such as organic acids and sugars, act as carbon sources. This culture style removes the need for light and thus offers the possibility of drastically increasing cell density, efficiency and productivity (102). Some microalgae can proliferate heterotrophically (103). The heterotrophic algal growth system has been documented to produce not only high algal biomass productivity but also high cellular oil contents (104,105). The heterotrophic growth of C. protothecoides on corn compound hydrolysate resulted in a 3.4-fold higher biomass yield than the autotrophic growth system and increased lipid content by 4.2-fold.

Compared with that during autotrophic growth, the production of biomass and lipids during heterotrophic growth is higher; however, it remains not as cost-effective because it requires a higher amount of organic carbon (acetate or glucose) than that of all other nutrients. A cheap tool has to be sought to offset high carbon expenses. Crude glycerol obtained during biodiesel processing can offer such a tool. While the demand for biodiesel continues to increase, crude glycerol is flooding the market (106). The prices of synthetic glycerol decreased from $0.25/lb in 2004 to $0.025-0.05/lb in 2006(66). The low demand and increased supply of crude glycerol have driven biodiesel manufacturers to search for ways to dispose of this by-product (107).

4. Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen is one of the well-recognised and most recommended specific oestrogen receptor (ER) modulators (108). The FDA affirmed its use for the treatment of women and men with early-stage breast cancer or malignant growth after a medical procedure or to diminish the danger of disease recurrence (109). Tamoxifen has been used to decrease the chance of breast malignancies in women who have not been diagnosed; however, they are at higher-than-normal risk for these malignancies. In women with ER-positive early breast cancer, the risk of recurrence reduced to 50% after 5 years of treatment with tamoxifen [Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (2015)]. The long-term use of tamoxifen is related to extreme reactions, for example, nausea, and can cause aneuploidy and endometrial and hepatic diseases. The critical characteristics of tamoxifen are revealed in Table III.

Table III

Tamoxifen characteristics

Table III

Tamoxifen characteristics

NameTamoxifen
Molar mass371.515 g/mol
Formula C26H29NO
Other namesTMX; ICI-46474
Trade nameNolvadex, Genox, Tamifen, and others
Elimination half-life5-7 days
Bioavailability~100%

Tamoxifen (ICI 46, 474) is a triphenylethylene derivative and exists in trans-isomeric form. This tetra-substituted olefin is a nonsteroidal antihormonal drug used for the treatment of breast cancer. It is administered orally and available in the form of citrate salt with the common marketed name Nolvadex (110-114). The citrate salt of tamoxifen exists in the form of a fine white crystalline powder, which is readily soluble in organic solvents, for example acetone, methanol and ethanol, and is partially soluble in water. The stability of tamoxifen citrate depends on its exposure to light and moisture. If properly stored, it can be stable for 5 years. However, humid conditions are unsuitable for this compound, and it becomes hygroscopic under conditions of high humidity. It has been applied worldwide for >40 years and is the most common antioestrogen drug used in chemotherapy. It is usually prescribed for the treatment of oestrogen-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen binds competitively to the ER of cancer cells to form a nuclear complex, which results in oestrogen inhibition and decreases DNA synthesis. The pharmacological activity of this drug requires metabolic activation. The 2D6 cytochrome P450 converts the pharmacologically inactive tamoxifen into endoxifen (100). Tamoxifen has been found to decrease the rate of breast cancer with its long-term use. It is amongst the highly recommended breast cancer drugs due to its fewer side effects than other treatments. It has been the primary choice for the therapy of postmenopausal, node-positive, oestrogen/progesterone receptor-positive and postmenopausal, node-negative, oestrogen/progesterone receptor-positive women since the ‘90s. It is one of the common drugs recommended after breast cancer surgery and radiation therapy and for the treatment of women who are at risk of developing invasive carcinoma (115).

Nausea, vaginal dryness, irregular periods, hot flashes and decreased urine amount are amongst the common side effects of tamoxifen (92,116). Another important side effect of tamoxifen is its agonistic effect on all tissues, namely, bones, ovaries, heart and liver, including breast tissues. It participates in forming excess reactive oxygen species within the mitochondria, leading to cell apoptosis (94). In a few cases, the long-term use of tamoxifen also involves the blistering, peeling and loosening of the skin, cataracts, anxiety, chest pain, cough, confusion, pelvic pain, pain and swelling of arms and legs and diarrhoea.

5. Immunological mechanisms of action

As aforementioned, tamoxifen has differential effects on various tissues. Two types of ER exist, namely, ER-α and ER-β (117). Tamoxifen exhibits differential expression with both of these ligand receptors (81). For decades, the antiproliferative action of tamoxifen was considered to be due to its agonistic effect on ER-α. However, in 1996, tamoxifen was reported to have an antagonistic effect on ER-β (118,119). The expression of tamoxifen on ER-α either leads to the inhibition of cell growth or death of cancer cells. The anti-oestrogenic mechanism of tamoxifen on ER-α can induce apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. However, the in vitro mechanism of tamoxifen was found to be concentration-dependent; at low concentrations (nM), tamoxifen can only inhibit the growth of cells, whereas at high concentrations (µM), it leads to cell death (120).

6. Metabolism of tamoxifen

N-desmethyl tamoxifen and 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl tamoxifen are the primary metabolites found after the oral administration of tamoxifen. The enzyme responsible for the metabolism of tamoxifen into 4-hydroxy tamoxifen is cytochrome P450 2D6, which undergoes further metabolism to afford endoxifen. These active metabolites account for tamoxifen's antiproliferative and ER binding ability, and their decreased production will affect the efficacy of the drug because they have the potential to induce apoptotic cell death in MCF-7 (ER-positive), MDA MB 231 (ER-negative) and BT-20 (ER-negative) cell lines (121). Therefore, induced apoptosis might be the primary mechanism of the antitumour activity of tamoxifen. Nevertheless, several attempts have been made to study the non-ER-mediated mechanism of tamoxifen at the cellular and molecular levels due to its efficacy in ER-negative cancers. It has also been used to treat other malignancies, including hepatocellular, ovarian, renal and pancreatic cancers, other than breast carcinoma (122). Therefore, the antitumour effect of tamoxifen is due to a combination of ER-mediated (genomic) and non-ER-mediated (non-genomic) mechanisms. Various signalling proteins are involved in nongenomic pathways, including TGF-β, calmodulin, MAP kinases and protein kinase C (123-125). The statistics of tamoxifen are revealed in Table IV.

Table IV

Statistics of Tamoxifen.

Table IV

Statistics of Tamoxifen.

First author/s, yearDiseaseTreatmentType of cellsSignificance(Refs.)
Shen et al, 2010Lung cancer(Tamoxifen + Gefitinib) 106 mol/l for 72 hA549 and H1650Significant(130)
Torti et al, 1984Prostate cancerTamoxifen Citrate, Oral (10-50 mg/twice day)In vivo Non-significant(131)
Hoelting et al, 1995Follicular and papillary thyroid cancer1.5 µMFTC133, FTC236, and FTC238Significant(132)
Chen and Thompson, 2003Breast cancer10 µMMDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231Significant(133)
He et al, 2015Glioblastoma15 µMA172, U251, BT325 and U87Significant(134)

7. Other related drugs

Other antioestrogen drugs are used as the second line of breast cancer treatment. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the comparative effects of tamoxifen and other antioestrogen drugs, for example megestrol acetate. In a survey, Nie et al concluded that tamoxifen and megestrol acetate could induce responses as initial treatments. They also studied the combined effects of both drugs however they did not obtain encouraging results (126). However, tamoxifen is still preferable because it has fewer side effects than megestrol acetate. Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, has been used to treat metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women who are steroid hormone receptor-positive. Compared with tamoxifen, letrozole effectively reduced the risk of periodic disease development in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer (127).

Tamoxifen is one of the most common drugs used as a first-line breast cancer treatment around the globe. Although the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics parameters of tamoxifen have been widely studied, its paragenetic factor still remains to be explored. In vivo studies are performed to evaluate and screen the effects of new drug molecules for the treatment of any disease. Various studies have been conducted to assess the in vivo effects of tamoxifen and reported different results. The over-dosage of tamoxifen has not demonstrated any acute toxicity. However, tamoxifen has been found to induce retinopathy in a dose-dependent manner (128). Data on toxicity in children are unavailable. Tamoxifen has exhibited osteogenic agonist effects in some animal species at high dosages (129). The effect of tamoxifen and microalgal extracts on normal and breast cancer cells is depicted in Fig. 3. As aforementioned, tamoxifen is used as a first-line breast cancer treatment.

Nonetheless, an important side effect of tamoxifen is damage to normal breast cells. Microalgal extracts may affect both cell lines; however, not normal cells. The present review highlights that the co-application of tamoxifen with microalgal extracts may lead to the targeted apoptosis of breast cancer cells and have minimal cytotoxic effects on normal cells.

8. Perspectives

The prospective product areas of algae include nutrient-rich food, bioenergy, bioactive medicine, novel enzymes, special chemicals, bio-fertilisers and bioremediation. They do not depend on one factor and are instead multifactorial with multiple target pathways. Therefore, further studies must be conducted to enhance the positive effects of already available drugs. Given that natural products have always been a great source of interest, the co-application of active algal extracts with tamoxifen can enhance activity against cancer cells or might be a helpful treatment for minimising the side effects of tamoxifen in other ways. Microalgal extracts may affect both cell lines; however, not normal cells. The present review highlights that the co-application of tamoxifen with microalgal extracts may lead to the targeted apoptosis of breast cancer cells and have minimal cytotoxic effects on normal cells. More research interest is necessary to clarify their ideal dosages, mechanisms of action and potential adverse effects.

9. Future directions

Tamoxifen is one of the most common drugs used in the first-line treatment of breast cancer worldwide. Although its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics parameters have been widely studied, its paragenetic factor has yet to be explored. Previous studies have determined that microalgal extracts, especially those with astaxanthin, have an essential role in anticancerous effects. However, to date, no studies have been conducted to investigate the modulatory action of microalgal extracts targeting specific mechanisms related to inflammation or immunological pathways. Previous studies have demonstrated that the cell cycle and treatment progression of cancer are unclear. They do not depend on one factor and are instead multifactorial with multiple target pathways. Therefore, further studies must be conducted to enhance the positive effects of already available drugs. Given that natural products have always been a great source of interest, the co-application of active algal extracts with tamoxifen can enhance activity against cancer cells or might be a helpful treatment for minimising the side effects of tamoxifen in other ways.

10. Conclusion

The regulation of breast cancer immunotherapy will benefit immensely from the use of microalgal extracts and tamoxifen. Both substances have the potential to strengthen the immune system's response to breast cancer cells, thereby improving therapy outcomes in affected patients. Tamoxifen's well-established involvement in the treatment of breast cancer and astaxanthin's antioxidant qualities imply a synergistic relationship that could enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, before considering the inclusion of these two essential compounds in clinical practice for improving breast cancer immunotherapy, additional research is necessary to clarify their ideal dosages, mechanisms of action and potential adverse effects.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be found in PubMed and Google Scholar at the following URL: https://scholar.google.com/, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

Authors' contributions

OMAS and TADAATD conceptualized the study. OMAS and HAA wrote the original draft. OMA, HAA, IAMT and TADAATD reviewed and edited the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Favoriti P, Carbone G, Greco M, Pirozzi F, Pirozzi REM and Corcione F: Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: A review. Updates Surg. 68:7–11. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Ferlay J, Parkin DM and Steliarova-Foucher E: Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer. 46:765–781. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Mohammadian M, Pakzad R, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A and Salehiniya H: A study on the incidence and mortality of leukemia and their association with the human development index (HDI) Worldwide In 2012. WCRJ. 5(e1080)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Nigjeh SE, Yeap SK, Nordin N, Rahman H and Rosli R: In Vivo anti-tumor effects of citral on 4T1 breast cancer cells via induction of apoptosis and downregulation of aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. Molecules. 24(3241)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Oh H, Eliassen AH, Beck AH, Rosner B, Schnitt SJ, Collins LC, Connolly JL, Montaser-Kouhsari L, Willett WC and Tamimi RM: Breast cancer risk factors in relation to estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, and Ki67 expression in normal breast tissue. NPJ Breast Cancer. 3(39)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Brind J, Condly SJ, Lanfranci A and Rooney B: Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on South Asian women. Issues Law Med. 33:32–54. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Iyengar NM, Chen IC, Zhou XK, Giri DD, Falcone DJ, Winston LA, Wang H, Williams S, Lu YS, Hsueh TH, et al: Adiposity, inflammation, and breast cancer pathogenesis in Asian women. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 11:227–236. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Saini P, Henshall C, Brett J, Watson E and Smith L: Interventions to improve the uptake of breast, cervical and bowel cancer screening in South Asian women living in high income countries. Prospero International prospective register of systematic reviews. LJMU Research Online (In Press).

9 

Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, Xiong HQ, Crane CH, Wang H, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Evans DB and Wolff RA: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 13:1035–1046. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Poste G and Fidler IJ: The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Nature. 283:139–146. 1980.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Gupta GP and Massagué J: Cancer metastasis: Building a framework. Cell. 127:679–695. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Shuda M, Arora R, Kwun HJ, Feng H, Sarid R, Fernández-Figueras MT, Tolstov Y, Gjoerup O, Mansukhani MM, Swerdlow SH, et al: Human Merkel cell polyomavirus infection I. MCV T antigen expression in Merkel cell carcinoma, lymphoid tissues and lymphoid tumors. Int J Cancer. 125:1243–1249. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Johnston WW: The malignant pleural effusion. A review of cytopathologic diagnoses of 584 specimens from 472 consecutive patients. Cancer. 56:905–909. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Electronic address: elizabeth.demicco@sinaihealthsystem.ca 1; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive and integrated genomic characterization of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Cell. 171:950–965.e28. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Rybka J, Gębura K, Wróbel T, Wysoczańska B, Stefanko E, Kuliczkowski K and Bogunia-Kubik K: Variations in genes involved in regulation of the nuclear factor-KappaB pathway and the risk of acute myeloid leukaemia. Int J Immunogenet. 43:101–106. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Riihimäki M, Hemminki A, Sundquist J and Hemminki K: Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer. Sci Rep. 6(29765)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Curado MP: Breast cancer in the world: Incidence and mortality. Salud Publica Mex. 53:372–384. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Tan MM, Ho WK, Yoon SY, Mariapun S, Hasan SN, Lee DS, Hassan T, Lee SY, Phuah SY, Sivanandan K, et al: A case-control study of breast cancer risk factors in 7,663 women in Malaysia. PLoS One. 13(e0203469)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D and Bray F: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 136:E359–E386. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Coccia M: What is the Cause of Breast Cancer? A Socioeconomic Analysis. CocciaLab Working Paper 2017 – No. 16. SSRN - Elsevier, Rochester, NY, 2017.

21 

Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD and Arias E: Mortality in the United States, 2017. NCHS Data Brief. (328):1–8. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Miniño AM, Murphy SL, Xu J and Kochanek KD: Deaths: Final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 59:1–126. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Lengacher CA, Reich RR, Paterson CL, Ramesar S, Park JY, Alinat C, Johnson-Mallard V, Moscoso M, Budhrani-Shani P, Miladinovic B, et al: Examination of broad symptom improvement resulting from mindfulness-based stress reduction in breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 34:2827–2834. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Flores-Pérez A, Marchat LA, Rodríguez-Cuevas S, Bautista VP, Fuentes-Mera L, Romero-Zamora D, Maciel-Dominguez A, de la Cruz OH, Fonseca-Sánchez M, Ruíz-García E, et al: Suppression of cell migration is promoted by miR-944 through targeting of SIAH1 and PTP4A1 in breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 16(379)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA and Jemal A: Breast cancer statistics,. 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:439–448. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Leslie NS, Deiriggi P, Gross S, DuRant ME, Smith C and Veshnesky JG: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding breast cancer screening in educated Appalachian women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 30:659–667. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A and Siegel RL: Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 69:438–451. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Hisham AN and Yip CH: Spectrum of breast cancer in Malaysian women: Overview. World J Surg. 27:921–923. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Lim GC: Overview of cancer in Malaysia. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 32 (suppl_1):S37–S42. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Kan CS and Chan KM: A review of lung cancer research in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 71 (Suppl 1):S70–S78. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Naing C, Lai PK and Mak JW: Immediately modifiable risk factors attributable to colorectal cancer in Malaysia. BMC Public Health. 17(637)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Rezakhani L, Rashidi Z, Mirzapur P and Khazaei M: Antiproliferatory effects of crab shell extract on breast cancer cell line (MCF7). J Breast Cancer. 17:219–225. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Singh S, Chitkara D, Mehrazin R, Behrman SW, Wake RW and Mahato RI: Chemoresistance in prostate cancer cells is regulated by miRNAs and Hedgehog pathway. PLoS One. 7(e40021)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Fanciullino R, Ciccolini J and Milano G: Challenges, expectations and limits for nanoparticles-based therapeutics in cancer: A focus on nano-albumin-bound drugs. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 88:504–513. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Farooqi AO, Cham M, Zhang L, Beasley MB, Austin JH, Miller A, Zulueta JJ, Roberts H, Enser C, Kao SJ, et al: Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199:781–786. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Soriano ME and Scorrano L: Traveling Bax and forth from mitochondria to control apoptosis. Cell. 145:15–17. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Foo CS, Su D, Chong CK, Chng HC, Tay KH, Low SC and Tan SM: Breast cancer in young Asian women: Study on survival. ANZ J Surg. 75:566–572. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Park HH: Structural features of caspase-activating complexes. Int J Mol Sci. 13:4807–4818. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Takayama T, Miyanishi K, Hayashi T, Sato Y and Niitsu Y: Colorectal cancer: Genetics of development and metastasis. J Gastroenterol. 41:185–192. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Ma Y, Kepp O, Ghiringhelli F, Apetoh L, Aymeric L, Locher C, Tesniere A, Martins I, Ly A, Haynes NM, et al: Chemotherapy and radiotherapy: Cryptic anticancer vaccines. Semin Immunol. 22:113–124. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Green DR: Apoptotic pathways: Ten minutes to dead. Cell. 121:671–674. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Zhou X, Zhang J, Jia Q, Ren Y, Wang Y, Shi L, Liu N, Wang G, Pu P, You Y and Kang C: Reduction of miR-21 induces glioma cell apoptosis via activating caspase 9 and 3. Oncol Rep. 24:195–201. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Fischer M: Conservation and divergence of the p53 gene regulatory network between mice and humans. Oncogene. 38:4095–4109. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

El Shamieh S, Saleh F, Assaad S and Farhat F: Next-generation sequencing reveals mutations in RB1, CDK4 and TP53 that may promote chemo-resistance to palbociclib in ovarian cancer. Drug Metab Pers Ther 34:/j/dmdi.2019.34.issue-2/dmpt-2018-0027/dmpt-2018-0027.xml, 2019.

45 

Miles J, Applebee CJ, Leboucher P, López Fernández S, Lee DJ, Guarch R, Ward S, Parker PJ, López JI and Larijani B: Time resolved amplified FRET identifies protein kinase B activation state as a marker for poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BBA Clin. 8:97–102. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Abdullah MA, Bahamid AAA, Alshajrawi OMS, Nazir MS and Tahir Z: Integrated biomaterials engineering of oil palm fibres and microalgae for bioenergy, environmental remediation, and conversion into value-added-products. OP Conf. Ser: Earth Environ. Sci. 448(012091)2020.

47 

Zhou Y, Yu F, Luo B, Luo H and Liu C: Cytrarabine (Ara-c) promotes cell apoptosis by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Protein Kinase B (AKT/PKB). Process Biochemistry. Vol 82. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp144-152, 2019.

48 

Rahman KM: Microalgae biotechnology for food, health and high value products. Springer, Singapore; 2020. 479 p. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-0169-2_1.

49 

Antoprete G and Berni P: Algae: An opportunity to obtain products with high value, to contribute to the reduction of environmental pollution and to achieve environmental sustainability. Journal of commodity science, technology and quality. 50:101–117. 2011.https://www.sci.unich.it/ricerca/jcs/content/2011/2011-01-06.pdf.

50 

Abdullah MA, Ahmad A, Shah SMU, Shanab SMM, Ali HEA, Abo-State MAM and Othman MF: Integrated algal engineering for bioenergy generation, effluent remediation, and production of high-value bioactive compounds. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 21:236–249. 2016.

51 

Abdullah MA, Shah SMU, Shanab SMM and Ali HEA: Integrated Algal Bioprocess Engineering for Enhanced Productivity of Lipid, Carbohydrate and High-Value Bioactive Compounds. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 6:61–92. 2017.

52 

Cioffi N, Torsi L, Ditaranto N, Tantillo G, Ghibelli L, Sabbatini L, Bleve-Zacheo T, D'Alessio M, Zambonin PG and Traversa E: Copper nanoparticle/polymer composites with antifungal and bacteriostatic properties. Chem. Mater. 17:5255–5262. 2005.

53 

Prakash JW, Marimuthu J and Jeeva S: Antimicrobial activity of certain fresh water microalgae from Thamirabarani River, Tamil Nadu, South India. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 1:S170–S173. 2011.

54 

Schade S and Meier T: A comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of cultivating microalgae in different production systems and climatic zones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Algal Res. 40(101485)2019.

55 

Smit AJ: Medicinal and pharmaceutical uses of seaweed natural products : A review. J Appl Phycol. 16:245–262. 2004.

56 

Doušková I, Kaštánek F, Maléterová Y, Kaštánek P, Doucha J and Zachleder V: Utilization of distillery stillage for energy generation and concurrent production of valuable microalgal biomass in the sequence : In: Energy Conversion and Management. Vol 51. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p606-11, 2010.

57 

Alam A and Wang Z: Microalgae biotechnology for development of biofuel and wastewater treatment. Springer, Singapore, p646, 2019.

58 

Mata TM, Martins AA and Caetano NS: Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications : A review. In: Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. Vol 14. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp217-232, 2010.

59 

Hochman G and Zilberman D: Algae farming and its bio-products. In: In Plants and BioEnergy. Springer, New York, NY, pp49-64, 2014.

60 

Guedes AC, Amaro HM and Malcata FX: Microalgae as sources of carotenoids. Mar Drugs. 9:625–644. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Apt KE and Behrens PW: Commercial Developments In Microalgal Biotechnology. J Phycol. 35:215–226. 1999.

62 

Martinez Hernandez A, Urbanke H, Gillman AL, Lee J, Ryazanov S, Agbemenyah HY, Benito E, Jain G, Kaurani L, Grigorian G, et al: The diphenylpyrazole compound anle 138b blocks Aβ channels and rescues disease phenotypes in a mouse model for amyloid pathology. EMBO Mol Med. 10:32–47. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Enzing C, Ploeg M, Barbosa M and Sijtsma L: Microalgae-based products for the food and feed sector: An outlook for Europe. 2014. (PDF) Microalgae-based products for food and feed sector: an outlook for Europe.

64 

Boroumand Moghaddam A, Moniri M, Azizi S, Abdul Rahim R, Bin Ariff A, Navaderi M and Mohamad R: Eco-friendly formulated zinc oxide nanoparticles: Induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in the MCF-7 cancer cell line. Genes (Basel). 8(281)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Cole JJ: Interactions between bacteria and algae in aquatic ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 13:291–314. 1982.

66 

Cha KH, Koo SY and Lee DU: Antiproliferative effects of carotenoids extracted from Chlorella ellipsoidea and Chlorella vulgaris on human colon cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem. 56:10521–10526. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Kusaikin MI, Ermakova SP, Shevchenko NM, Isakov VV, Gorshkov AG, Vereshchagin AL, Grachev MA and Zvyagintseva TN: Structural characteristics and antitumor activity of a new chrysolaminaran from the diatom alga Synedra acus. Chem Nat Compd. 46:1–4. 2010.

68 

Pasquet V, Morisset P, Ihammouine S, Chepied A, Aumailley L, Berard JB, Serive B, Kaas R, Lanneluc I, Thiery V, et al: Antiproliferative activity of violaxanthin isolated from bioguided fractionation of Dunaliella tertiolecta extracts. Mar Drugs. 9:819–831. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Erfani N, Nazemosadat Z and Moein M: Cytotoxic activity of ten algae from the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea on human breast cancer cell lines; MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and T-47D. Pharmacognosy Res. 7:133–137. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Srivastava A, Laidler P, Davies RP, Horgan K and Hughes LE: The prognostic significance of tumor vascularity in intermediate-thickness (0.76-4.0 mm thick) skin melanoma. A quantitative histologic study. Am J Pathol. 133:419–423. 1988.PubMed/NCBI

71 

Kim YS, Li XF, Kang KH, Ryu BM and Kim SK: Stigmasterol isolated from marine microalgae Navicula incerta induces apoptosis in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. BMB Rep. 47:433–438. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Ciferri O: Spirulina, the Edible Microorganism. Microbiol Rev. 47:551–578. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Athasivam R, Radhakrishnan R, Hashem A and Abd Allah EF: Microalgae metabolites: A rich source for food and medicine. Saudi J Biol Sci. 26:709–722. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tân PF, Westra WH, Chung CH, Jordan RC, Lu C, et al: Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 363:24–35. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

75 

Ambati RR, Phang SM, Ravi S and Aswathanarayana RG: Astaxanthin: Sources, extraction, stability, biological activities and its commercial applications-a review. Mar Drugs. 12:128–152. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

76 

Cardozo KHM, Guaratini T, Barros MP, Falcão VR, Tonon AP, Lopes NP, Campos S, Torres MA, Souza AO, Colepicolo P and Pinto E: Metabolites from algae with economical impact. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 146:60–78. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

77 

Grune T, Lietz G, Palou A, Ross AC, Stahl W, Tang G, Thurnham D, Yin SA and Biesalski HK: Beta-Carotene is an important vitamin A source for humans. J Nutr. 140:2268S–2285S. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Rajendran S, Rathish RJ, Prabha SS and Anandan A: Green electrochemistry-a versatile tool in green synthesis: An overview. Port Electrochim Acta. 34:321–342. 2016.

79 

Thomford NE, Dzobo K, Chopera D, Wonkam A, Skelton M, Blackhurst D, Chirikure S and Dandara C: Pharmacogenomics implications of using herbal medicinal plants on African populations in health transition. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 8:637–663. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

80 

Balandrin MF, Klocke JA, Wurtele ES and Bollinger WH: Natural plant chemicals: Sources of industrial and medicinal materials. Science. 228:1154–1160. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

81 

Johnson DT and Taconi KA: The glycerin glut: Options for the value-added conversion of crude glycerol resulting from biodiesel production. Environ Prog. 26:338–348. 2007.

82 

Widjaja A, Chien CC and Ju YH: Study of increasing lipid production from fresh water microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 40:13–20. 2009.

83 

Nick GL: Addressing human exposure to environmental toxins with Chlorella pyrenoidosa. (Medicinal Properties in Whole Foods). Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients. (237):28–33. 2003.

84 

Gerardo ML, Van Den Hende S, Vervaeren H, Coward T and Skill SC: Harvesting of microalgae within a biorefinery approach: A review of the developments and case studies from pilot-plants. Algal Res. 11:248–262. 2015.

85 

Illman AM, Scragg AH and Shales SW: Increase in Chlorella strains calorific values when grown in low nitrogen medium. Enzyme Microb Technol. 27:631–635. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

86 

Fathima HM and Geetha RV: Phytochemical screening and antioxidant activity of Thymus vulgaris. Drug Invention Today. 11:1803–1806. 2019.

87 

ABDULLAH MA, Shah SMU, Ahmad A and El-Sayed H: ALGAL biotechnology for bioenergy, environmental remediation and high-value biochemicals. biotechnology and bioinformatics: advances and Applications for Bioenergy, Bioremediation and Biopharmaceutical Research 301, 2014.

88 

Dempster TA and Sommerfeld MR: Effects of environmental conditions on growth and lipid accumulation in Nitzschia communis (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol. 34:712–721. 1998.

89 

Takagi M and Karseno and Yoshida T: Effect of salt concentration on intracellular accumulation of lipids and triacylglyceride in marine microalgae Dunaliella cells. J Biosci Bioeng. 101:223–226. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

90 

Rao AR, Dayananda C, Sarada R, Shamala TR and Ravishankar GA: Effect of salinity on growth of green alga Botryococcus braunii and its constituents. Bioresour Technol. 98:560–564. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

91 

McGinnis KM, Dempster TA and Sommerfeld MR: Characterization of the growth and lipid content of the diatom Chaetoceros muelleri. J Appl Phycol. 9:19–24. 1997.

92 

Xu H, Miao X and Wu Q: High quality biodiesel production from a microalga Chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. J Biotechnol. 126:499–507. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

93 

Behrenfeld MJ and Milligan AJ: Photophysiological expressions of iron stress in phytoplankton. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 5:217–246. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

94 

Lynn SG, Kilham SS, Kreeger DA and Interlandi SJ: Effect of nutrient availability on the biochemical and elemental stoichiometry in the freshwater diatom Stephanodiscus minutulus (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol. 36:510–522. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

95 

Reitan KI, Rainuzzo JR and Olsen Y: Effect of nutrient limitation on fatty acid and lipid content of marine microalgae 1. J Phycol. 30:972–979. 1994.

96 

Guschina IA and Harwood JL: Lipids and lipid metabolism in eukaryotic algae. Prog Lipid Res. 45:160–186. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

97 

Lebsky VK, Gonzalez-Bashan LE and Bashan Y: Ultrastructure of interaction in alginate beads between the microalga Chlorella vulgaris with its natural associative bacterium Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum and with the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Can J Microbiol. 47:1–8. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

98 

Bashan Y and De-Bashan LE: Protection of tomato seedlings against infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato by using the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Appl Environ Microbiol. 68:2637–2643. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

99 

Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E and Isambert A: Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng. 101:87–96. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

100 

Liu ZY, Wang GC and Zhou BC: Effect of iron on growth and lipid accumulation in Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresour Technol. 99:4717–4722. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

101 

Renju GL, Muraleedhara Kurup G and Bandugula VR: Effect of lycopene isolated from Chlorella marina on proliferation and apoptosis in human prostate cancer cell line PC-3. Tumour Biol. 35:10747–10758. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

102 

Saad SM, Yusof YAM and Ngah WZW: Comparison between locally produced Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella vulgaris from Japan on proliferation and apoptosis of liver cancer cell line, HepG2. Malays J Biochem Mol Biol, pp32-36, 2006.

103 

Wu LC, Ho JA, Shieh MC and Lu IW: Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of Spirulina and Chlorella water extracts. J Agric Food Chem. 53:4207–4212. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

104 

Yusof YA, Saad SM, Makpol S, Shamaan NA and Ngah WZ: Hot water extract of Chlorella vulgaris induced DNA damage and apoptosis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 65:1371–1377. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

105 

Pugh N, Ross SA, ElSohly HN, ElSohly MA and Pasco DS: Isolation of three high molecular weight polysaccharide preparations with potent immunostimulatory activity from Spirulina platensis, Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Planta Med. 67:737–742. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

106 

Jayshree A, Jayashree S and Thangaraju N: Chlorella vulgaris and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Effective antioxidant, antibacterial and anticancer mediators. Indian J Pharm Sci. 78:575–581. 2016.

107 

Sedighi M, Jalili H, Ranaei-Siadat SO and Amrane A: Potential health effects of enzymatic protein hydrolysates from Chlorella vulgaris. Appl Food Biotechnol. 3:160–169. 2016.

108 

Yasukawa K, Akihisa T, Kanno H, Kaminaga T, Izumida M, Sakoh T, Tamura T and Takido M: Inhibitory effects of sterols isolated from Chlorella vulgaris on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced inflammation and tumor promotion in mouse skin. Biol Pharm Bull. 19:573–576. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

109 

Carvalho WF and Granéli E: Acidotropic probes and flow cytometry: A powerful combination for detecting phagotrophy in mixotrophic and heterotrophic protists. Aquat Microb Ecol. 44:85–96. 2006.

110 

Chisti Y: Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv. 25:294–306. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

111 

Chisti Y: Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends Biotechnol. 26:126–131. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

112 

Roselet F, Vandamme D, Roselet M, Muylaert K and Abreu PC: Effects of pH, salinity, biomass concentration, and algal organic matter on flocculant efficiency of synthetic versus natural polymers for harvesting microalgae biomass. Bioenergy Res. 10:427–437. 2017.

113 

Martínez F and Orús MI: Interactions between glucose and inorganic carbon metabolism in Chlorella vulgaris strain UAM 101. Plant Physiol. 95:1150–1155. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

114 

Benemann JR and Oswald WJ: Systems and economic analysis of microalgae ponds for conversion of CO {sub 2} to biomass. Final report. California Univ., Berkeley CA (United States). Dept. of Civil Engineering; 1996. Systems and economic analysis of microalgae ponds for conversion of CO{sub 2} to biomass. Final report (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOV.

115 

Lv JM, Cheng LH, Xu XH, Zhang L and Chen HL: Enhanced lipid production of Chlorella vulgaris by adjustment of cultivation conditions. Bioresour Technol. 101:6797–6804. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

116 

Hu J, Nagarajan D, Zhang Q, Chang JS and Lee DJ: Heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae for pigment production: A review. Biotechnol Adv. 36:54–67. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

117 

Thompson JC and He BB: Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Appl Eng Agric. 22:261–265. 2006.

118 

Liang Y, Sarkany N and Cui Y: Biomass and lipid productivities of Chlorella vulgaris under autotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic growth conditions. Biotechnol Lett. 31:1043–1049. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

119 

Boele FW, Schilder CM, de Roode ML, Deijen JB and Schagen SB: Cognitive functioning during long-term tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Menopause. 22:17–25. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

120 

Abdel-Qadir H, Amir E, Fischer HD, Fu L, Austin PC, Harvey PJ, Rochon PA, Lee DS and Anderson GM: The risk of myocardial infarction with aromatase inhibitors relative to tamoxifen in post-menopausal women with early stage breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 68:11–21. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

121 

Tamoxifen KS: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Open Access Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2017;1: 1-8, 2017. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/122001.

122 

Buckley MM and Goa KL: Tamoxifen: A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use. Drugs. 37:451–490. 1989.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

123 

Fukuno N, Matsui H, Kanda Y, Suzuki O, Matsumoto K, Sasaki K and Tamura S: TGF-β-activated kinase 1 mediates mechanical stress-induced IL-6 expression in osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 408:202–207. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

124 

Elnaggar YS, El-Massik MA and Abdallah OY: Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems of tamoxifen citrate: Design and optimization. Int J Pharm. 380:133–141. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

125 

Kamato D, Burch ML, Piva TJ, Rezaei HB, Rostam MA, Xu S, Zheng W, Little PJ and Osman N: Transforming growth factor-beta signalling: Role and consequences of Smad linker region phosphorylation. Cell Signal. 25:2017–2024. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

126 

Moon AS and Dorigo O: Long-term efficacy of megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in a recurrent adult granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol Rep 36 100770, 2021.

127 

Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, Cawthorn S, Hamed H, Holli K and Howell A: International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I Investigators. Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer-96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 99:272–282. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

128 

Cella D and Fallowfield LJ: Recognition and management of treatment-related side effects for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 107:167–180. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

129 

Lash TL, Fox MP, Westrup JL, Fink AK and Silliman RA: Adherence to tamoxifen over the five-year course. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 99:215–220. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

130 

Shen H, Yuan Y, Sun J, Gao W and Shu YQ: Combined tamoxifen and gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer shows antiproliferative effects. Biomed Pharmacother. 64:88–92. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

131 

Torti FM, Lum BL, Lo R, Freiha F and Shortliffe L: Tamoxifen in advanced prostatic carcinoma. A dose escalation study. Cancer. 54:739–743. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

132 

Hoelting T, Siperstein AE, Duh QY and Clark OH: Tamoxifen inhibits growth, migration, and invasion of human follicular and papillary thyroid cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:308–313. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

133 

Chen J and Thompson LU: Lignans and tamoxifen, alone or in combination, reduce human breast cancer cell adhesion, invasion and migration in vitro. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 80:163–170. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

134 

He W, Liu R, Yang SH and Yuan F: Chemotherapeutic effect of tamoxifen on temozolomide-resistant gliomas. Anticancer Drugs. 26:293–300. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2025
Volume 22 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Al-Shajrawi OM, Tarawneh IA, Tengku Din TD and Afolabi HA: The role of microalgal extracts and their combination with tamoxifen in the modulation of breast cancer immunotherapy (Review). Mol Clin Oncol 22: 6, 2025.
APA
Al-Shajrawi, O.M., Tarawneh, I.A., Tengku Din, T.D., & Afolabi, H.A. (2025). The role of microalgal extracts and their combination with tamoxifen in the modulation of breast cancer immunotherapy (Review). Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 22, 6. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2024.2801
MLA
Al-Shajrawi, O. M., Tarawneh, I. A., Tengku Din, T. D., Afolabi, H. A."The role of microalgal extracts and their combination with tamoxifen in the modulation of breast cancer immunotherapy (Review)". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 22.1 (2025): 6.
Chicago
Al-Shajrawi, O. M., Tarawneh, I. A., Tengku Din, T. D., Afolabi, H. A."The role of microalgal extracts and their combination with tamoxifen in the modulation of breast cancer immunotherapy (Review)". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 22, no. 1 (2025): 6. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2024.2801