Open Access

Prevalence of ACA variations: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

  • Authors:
    • George Fotakopoulos
    • Alexandros G. Brotis
    • Ourania Fotakopoulou
    • Charalampos Gatos
    • Konstantinos Mantzarlis
    • Vasiliki Epameinondas Georgakopoulou
    • Pagona Sklapani
    • Nikolaos Trakas
    • Kostas N. Fountas
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 15, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.178
  • Article Number: 54
  • Copyright : © Fotakopoulos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and its divisions enclose symptomatically critical and supplementary differentiations. Anatomical variations of the distal ACA that are irregularly detected can be separated into three major groups, namely, azygos, bihemispheric and median ACA variations. The present study performed a systematic review and meta‑analysis. The PICOS criteria and electronic databases, namely the Cochrane Library, PubMed (until December, 2023), Embase (until December, 2023) and MEDLINE (until December, 2023) were used to identify 48 articles to fulfill the eligible criteria. As a limited number of studies exist on the prevalence of ACA anatomical variations, the present meta‑analysis aimed to determine the precise incidence of these variants. In addition, with the comparative description between cadaveric (autopsy) and imaging cases, more accurate results were extract from the prevalence presentation of the distal ACA variants. On the whole, no statistically significant differences were found between autopsy and imaging studies. 

Introduction

The anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and its divisions enclose symptomatically critical differentiations. Anatomical variations of the distal ACA that are irregularly detected can be separated into three main groups, namely azygos, bihemispheric and median ACA variations (1). The azygos ACA appears after the fusion of the two A2 sections, which pass through the medial wall of the brain and separate under the genus (2-7). In addition, when one of the two A2 divisions is hypoplastic, the contralateral artery separates to irrigate the hemispheres at the same time. This structure is known as a bihemispheric ACA (6,8,9). When an additional third distal ACA branch appears, running to the distal medial surface of one or both hemispheres, this anatomical variant is named median ACA (8,10-12). The acquaintance with the ACA structure is essential for neurosurgeons and radiologists in the identification and managing pathological injuries, although avoiding lesions such as aneurysm development and low irrigation, leading to cerebral ischemia (13).

As the number of available studies on the prevalence of the ACA anatomical variations are limited, the present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the precise incidence of these variants. In addition, with the comparative description between cadaveric (autopsy) and imaging cases, more accurate results can be extracted from the prevalence presentation of the distal ACA variants.

Data and methods

Literature search strategy

The present meta-analysis examined the relative studies involving intracranial ACA variations imaging vs. autopsy evaluation throughout electronic records, counting the Cochrane Library, PubMed (until December, 2023), Embase (until December, 2023), and MEDLINE (until December, 2023). For the study protocol establishment and plan, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied. The key words ‘anterior cerebral artery’, ‘Anatomy A1’, ‘Anatomy A2’, ‘anterior cerebral artery variations’ and ‘anterior cerebral artery anomalies’ were used.

Selection of studies

For the evaluation of the risk of bias, the Cochrane Collaboration tool was applied by two authors (GF and AGB) for each article. The evaluation included random sequence generation and allocation concealment. The assessed results were classified according to the percentage of the risk into low, high or unclear. In the case of a discrepancy, a different investigator with authority provided the concluding solution. The flow chart of the data extraction procedure is presented in Fig. 1.

Screening

The following exclusion criteria were used: Duplicate articles and those without clear results were excluded from the final article pool. Bibliographic fields, such as title, abstract and investigators were noticeable through the screening. The final article pool excluded duplicate articles and those with no clear results. Records were identified through database searching (n=422 articles) and an additional search through additional bases also identified articles (n=5). Documentations after duplicates were eliminated (n=427). The records were screened (n=233), and records were ruled out (n=172). Full-text articles were evaluated for inclusion criteria (n=61) and eliminated for unclear or confusing results (n=13). The remaining articles were included in the qualitative procedure (n=48). The inclusion criteria were the following: i) Included relative studies involving intracranial ACA variations imaging vs. autopsy evaluation; ii) were primary research articles; and iii) studies published in the English language.

Extraction process

The following entities were extracted from the selected studies: Estimations of associations between different ACA variations, sample sizes and sample characteristics, the prevalence of each ACA variation, and comparisons between imaging and autopsy data. A total of 48 articles were independently found to fulfill the criteria. There is no test to evaluate the export agreement. The extraction procedures are usual compromises and depend on a large sample of patients (>24.949 patients in the 48 included studies).

For the primary research question, the present study used PICOS criteria (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study), to determine eligibility into the article pool. The complete information of these studies is presented in Table I.

Table I

Determined prevalence of anatomical characteristics based on study type (autopsy or imaging).

Table I

Determined prevalence of anatomical characteristics based on study type (autopsy or imaging).

A, Autopsy
Author(s), year of publicationStudy designTotal no. of patients, n=24, 949 (100%)Azygos ACA, n=127/22, 429 (0.6%)Bihemishperic ACA, n=109/1, 811 (6.0%)Median ACA, n=319/6, 706 (4.7%)(Refs.)
Windle et al, 1888Retro200609(15)
Fawcett and Blachford, 1905Retro7000023(16)
Jain, 1964Retro3000026(18)
Fisher, 1965Retro414700(19)
LeMay and Gooding, 1966Retro107400(20)
Ring and Waddington, 1968Retro25020(22)
Dunker and Harris, 1976Retro20200(23)
Ozaki et al, 1977Retro1460021(25)
Perlmutter and Rhoton, 1978Retro250160(26)
Tulleken, 1978Retro75108(24)
Kayembe et al, 1984Retro440010(29)
Gomes et al, 1986Retro30101(30)
Marinković et al, 1990Retro22002(31)
Ogawa et al, 1990Retro2060027(32)
Nathal et al, 1992Retro134005(33)
van der Zwan et al, 1992Retro25020(34)
Serizawa et al, 1997Retro30102(37)
Stefani et al, 2000Retro38103(12)
Avci et al, 2001Retro25101(38)
Kulenović et al, 2003Retro100001(39)
Paul and Mishra, 2004Retro50010(40)
Ugur et al, 2005Retro20110(41)
Tao et al, 2006Retro45001(42)
Ugur et al, 2006Retro50200(44)
Kahilogullari et al, 2008Retro300010(46)
Kapoor et al, 2008Retro1,0009023(10)
Nordon and Rodrigues, 2012Retro50003(49)
Swetha, 2012Retro70001(50)
Gunnal et al, 2013Retro39071(51)
Kedia et al, 2013Retro500911(5)
Cilliers et al, 2018Retro30005(54)
B, Imaging
Author(s), year of publicationStudy designTotal no. of patients, n=24, 949 (100%)Azygos ACA, n=127/22, 429 (0.6%)Bihemishperic ACA, n=109/1, 811 (6.0%)Median ACA, n=319/6, 706 (4.7%)(Refs.)
Baptista et al, 1963Retro38114550(17)
Wollschlaeger et al, 1967Retro291300(21)
Huber et al, 1980Retro7,7821700(27)
Kwak et al, 1980Retro2960013(28)
Sanders et al, 1993Retro5,190200(35)
Macchi et al, 1996Retro100209(36)
Uchino et al, 2006Retro89118027(43)
Bharatha et al, 2008Retro5041 0(45)
Lehecka et al, 2008Retro1014154(6)
Saidi et al, 2008Retro72040(47)
Nowinski et al, 2009Retro96000(7)
Zurada et al, 2010Retro115203(48)
Stefani et al, 2013Retro15021(53)
Hamidi et al, 2013Retro112595(52)
Kovač et al, 2014Retro4557410(13)
Wan-Yin et al, 2014Retro3,5721400(55)
López-Sala et al, 2020Retro4266022(56)

[i] ACA, anterior cerebral artery; Retro, retrospective.

Secondary research question(s) were associated with the study design and method (imaging or autopsy).

Expectations and hypotheses

It was hypothesized that there is a difference between autopsy and imaging studies concerning the prevalence of ACA variations. The variables used were azygos ACA, bihemispheric ACA and median ACA. All prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated these modalities were included. By contrast, reviews, editorials, pediatric cases, case reports, uncertain methods, or one of the two modalities separately from that article pool were excluded. Moreover, in order to reduce the risk of bias in the contained studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied as a quality evaluation measurement (Table II) (14).

Table II

Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) quality assessment of final article pool.

Table II

Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) quality assessment of final article pool.

A, Autopsy
 Newcastle-Ottawa Scale 
Author(s), year of publicationStudy designSelectionComparabilityExposureTotal scores(Refs.)
Windle et al, 1888Retro3339(15)
Fawcett and Blachford, 1905Retro3339(16)
Jain, 1964Retro3339(18)
Fisher, 1965Retro3339(19)
Lemay and Gooding, 1966Retro3339(20)
Ring and Waddington, 1968Retro3339(22)
Dunker and Harris, 1976Retro2237(23)
Ozaki et al, 1977Retro2237(25)
Perlmutter and Rhoton, 1978Retro2338(26)
Tulleken, 1978Retro3339(24)
Kayembe et al, 1984Retro3339(29)
Gomes et al, 1986Retro3339(30)
Marinković et al, 1990Retro3339(31)
Ogawa et al, 1990Retro3339(32)
Nathal et al, 1992Retro3339(33)
van der Zwan et al, 1992Retro3339(34)
Serizawa et al, 1997Retro3339(37)
Stefani et al, 2000Retro3339(12)
Avci et al, 2001Retro3339(38)
Kulenović et al, 2003Retro3339(39)
Paul and Mishra, 2004Retro3339(40)
Ugur et al, 2005Retro3238(41)
Tao et al, 2006Retro3328(42)
Ugur et al, 2006Retro3339(44)
Kahilogullari et al, 2008Retro3339(46)
Kapoor et al, 2008Retro3339(10)
Nordon and Rodrigues, 2012Retro3339(49)
Swetha, 2012Retro3339(50)
Gunnal et al, 2013Retro3339(51)
Kedia et al, 2013Retro3339(5)
Cilliers et al, 2018Retro3339(54)
B, Imaging
 Newcastle-Ottawa Scale 
Author(s), year of publicationStudy designSelectionComparabilityExposureTotal scores(Refs.)
Baptista et al, 1963Retro3238(17)
Wollschlaeger et al, 1967Retro3339(21)
Huber et al, 1980Retro3339(27)
Kwak et al, 1980Retro3339(28)
Sanders et al, 1993Retro3339(35)
Macchi et al, 1996Retro3339(36)
Uchino et al, 2006Retro3339(43)
Bharatha et al, 2008Retro3339(45)
Lehecka et al, 2008Retro3339(6)
Saidi et al, 2008Retro3339(47)
Nowinski et al, 2009Retro3339(7)
Zurada et al, 2010Retro3339(48)
Stefani et al, 2013Retro3339(53)
Hamidi et al, 2013Retro3339(52)
Kovač et al, 2014Retro3339(13)
Wan-Yin et al, 2014Retro3339(55)
López-Sala et al, 2020Retro3339(56)

[i] Retro, retrospective.

Statistical analysis

A random- and fixed-effects form meta-analysis was used to evaluate the proportion estimate for every outcome independently, as the I2 statistic was used to calculate the heterogeneity. A value of I2 in an amount <50% was considered as low heterogeneity, and an amount >50% was considered as high heterogeneity. The consequences were illustrated on forest plots. The Egger's regression test was used for the calculation of the risk of publication bias. The statistical package R We applied for all statistical analyses (R: Language and Environment, 2010). A value of P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

In total, 48 articles (5-7,10,12,13,15,16-56) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The entire number of participants was 24,949 [20,399 (81.7%) in imaging and 4,550 (18.3%) in autopsy observed groups]. The study sample was based on 48 articles (5-7,10,12,13,15,16-56) (Table I) and all of these articles were retrospective.

Azygos ACA variations

Information regarding azygos ACA variations was available in 26 articles (5,6,10,12,13,15,17,19-21,23,24,27,30,35-38,41,43-45,48,52,55,56). The total number of patients was 22,429 [19,920 (88.8%) in imaging and 2,509 (11.2%) in autopsy observed groups]. The prevalence of azygos ACA was 1.5% (mean) (95% CI, 0.01-0.02, P<0.01) (Table III and Fig. 2A). The heterogeneity was extensive (I2=83%). When examining the funnel plot, it was established that there was a significant publication bias (P<0.01; Fig. 2B). No significant differences were found between the prevalence established in autopsy (2%) and imaging (1%) studies (Table III).

Table III

Parameters for the results of the meta-analysis.

Table III

Parameters for the results of the meta-analysis.

 GroupsOverall effectHeterogeneityPrevalence (%)
ParametersIncluded Trials (n=48)ImagingAutopsyEffect estimate95% CII2 (%)P-valueImagingAutopsy
Azygos261992025090.01(0.01-0.02)83<0.0121
Bihemishperic1311366750.01(0.03-0.12)89<0.017.511
Median32289238140.05(0.04-0.07)85<0.0156

[i] I2, the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance; CI, confidence interval.

Bihemishperic ACA variations

As regards bihemispheric ACA variations, information was available in 13 articles (5,6,13,17,22,26,34,40,41,47,52-54). The total number of patients was 1,811 [1,136 (62.7%) in imaging and 675 (37.3%) in autopsy-observed groups]. The prevalence of bihemishperic ACA was 7.5% (mean) (95% CI, 0.03-0.12) (Table III and Fig. 3A). The heterogeneity was significant (I2=89%). When examining the funnel plot, it was established that there was a high publication bias (P<0.01) (Fig. 3B). No statistically significant differences were found between the prevalence of autopsy (11%) and imaging (7.5%) studies (Table III).

Median ACA variations

As regards, median ACA variations, information was available in 32 articles (5,6,10,12,13,15-18,24,25,28-33,36-39,42,43,46,48-54,56). The total number of patients was 6,706 [2,892 (43.1%) in imaging and 3,814 (56.9%) in autopsy observed groups]. The prevalence of the median ACA variant was 5.5% (mean) (95% CI, 0.04-0.07, P<0.01) (Table III and Fig. 4A). The heterogeneity was considerable (I2=85%). When examining the funnel plot, it was established that there was a high publication bias (P<0.01) (Fig. 4B). No considerable differences were found between the prevalence evaluated in imaging (5%) and autopsy (6%) articles (Table III).

Discussion

Anatomical variations of the distal ACA that are irregularly detected can be separated into three main groups, namely azygos, bihemispheric and median ACA variations (1) (Fig. 5). Concerning the topography and morphology, the azygous ACA variation reveals a particular midline vessel created from the connection of bilateral A1 segments next to the typical locality of the anterior communicating artery (A-comm) (20). Thus, mainly the A-comm is mislaid or hypoplastic, and the formed midline vessel passes through the inter-hemispheric fissure, supplying the medial hemispheres with blood (20). The clinical interest of the azygous ACA is that its appearance consists of pathologies leading to infarcts or aneurysms (57,58). According to the literature, the occurrence of an azygous ACA is 0.3% (2,59). The present meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of azygos ACA was 1.5% [autopsy (2%) and imaging (1%)].

Another moderately comparable anatomic modification is the bihemispheric ACA, where one of the two contralateral A1 segments is hypoplastic (59). Thus, the bihemispheric ACA feeds the two pericallosal regions equally with blood and its one-sided callosomarginal region (59). A with the azygos ACA, the bihemispheric ACA variation is connected with a number of pathologies, such as infarcts and aneurysms, in the regions where it supplies (59,60). In the literature, the prevalence of the bihemispheric ACA variation was found to be 0.20-8.0% (5,27). The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of bihemishperic ACA was 7.5%, and no significant differences were found between the prevalence in autopsy (11%) and imaging (7.5%) studies.

Strongly related to the azygos ACA is an additional variant where a median ACA is detected, and the third distal ACA appearance divisions to the distal medial region of one or both hemispheres (8,10,11). This variation may be the result of a hypoplastic ACA and the persistent expansion of the median artery of the corpus callosum (61). The literature demonstrates a wide range in the prevalence of median ACA between 1.0 and 35.0% (5,48). The present study revealed that the median ACA variant was 5.5%, and there were no notable differences between the prevalence evaluated in imaging (5%) and autopsy (6%) articles.

The present meta-analysis had certain limitations that should be mentioned. The main inadequacy was that its retrospective character was associated with potential miscalculations in assembling and understanding the records from the medical history.

In conclusion, the variations of the ACA's provide significant blood supply to anatomically valuable regions, such as the corpus callosum, or frontal lobe and basal ganglia. In addition, the pathologies behind their appearance, such as infarcts or aneurysm development, are critical. Thus, the knowledge of the ACA variations in prevalence may aid clinicians in managing aneurysms or tumors and other surgical procedures involving these regions, providing a strong justification for more extensive prospective clinical investigations.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

GF and VEG conceptualized the study. VEG, CG, AGB, OF, KM, GF, NT, PS and KNF analyzed the data, and wrote and prepared the draft of the manuscript. VEG and GF provided critical revisions. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, and have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. GF and VEG confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Use of artificial intelligence tools

During the preparation of this work, AI tools were used to improve the readability and language of the manuscript or to generate images, and subsequently, the authors revised and edited the content produced by the AI tools as necessary, taking full responsibility for the ultimate content of the present manuscript.

References

1 

Jinkins JR: 2000 Atlas of Neuroradiologic Embryology, Anatomy, and Variants. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PA, 2000.

2 

Burbank NS and Morris PP: Unique anomalous origin of the left anterior cerebral artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 26:2533–2535. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Cavalcanti DD, Albuquerque FC, Silva BF, Spetzler RF and Preul MC: The anatomy of the callosomarginal artery: Applications to microsurgery and endovascular surgery. Neurosurgery. 66:602–610. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Hussain Z, Corkill RA, Kuker W and Byrne JV: Distal aneurysms of the unpaired ACA: Embryologic and therapeutic aspects. Neuroradiology. 47:209–214. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Kedia S, Daisy S, Mukherjee KK, Salunke P, Srinivasa R and Narain MS: Microsurgical anatomy of the anterior cerebral artery in Indian cadavers. Neurol India. 61:117–121. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Lehecka M, Dashti R, Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M, Koivisto T, Ronkainen A, Rinne J and Jääskeläinen J: Microneurosurgical management of aneurysms at the A2 segment of anterior cerebral artery (proximal pericallosal artery) and its frontobasal branches. Surg Neurol. 70:232–246. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Nowinski WL, Thirunavuukarasuu A, Volkau I, Marchenko Y, Aminah B, Puspitasari F and Runge VM: A three-dimensional interactive atlas of cerebral arterial variants. Neuroinformatics. 7:255–264. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Dimmick SJ and Faulder KC: Normal variants of the cerebral circulation at multidetector CT angiography. Radiographics. 29:1027–1043. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Parmar H, Sitoh YY and Hui F: Normal variants of the intracranial circulation demonstrated by MR angiography at 3T. Eur J Radiol. 56:220–228. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Kapoor K, Singh B and Dewan LI: Variations in the configuration of the circle of Willis. Anat Sci Int. 83:96–106. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Niederberger E, Gauvrit JY, Morandi X, Carsin-Nicol B, Gauthier T and Ferré JC: Anatomic variants of the anterior part of the cerebral arterial circle at multidetector computed tomography angiography. J Neuroradiol. 37:139–147. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Stefani MA, Schneider FL, Marrone AC, Severino AG, Jackowski AP and Wallace MC: Anatomic variations of anterior cerebral artery cortical branches. Clin Anat. 13:231–236. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Kovač JD, Stanković A, Stanković D, Kovač B and Šaranović D: Intracranial arterial variations: A comprehensive evaluation using CT angiography. Med Sci Monit. 20:420–427. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M and Tugwell P: The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2014. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

15 

Windle BC: The arteries forming the circle of Willis. J Anat Physiol. 22 (Pt 2):289–293. 1888.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Fawcett E and Blachford JV: The circle of Willis: An examination of 700 specimens. J Anat Physiol. 40 (Pt 1):63.2–70. 1905.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Baptista AG: Studies on the arteries of the brain. ii. The anterior cerebral artery: Some anatomic features and their clinical implications. Neurology. 13:825–835. 1963.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Jain KK: Some observations on the anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. Can J Surg. 7:134–139. 1964.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Fisher CM: The Circle of Willis: Anatomical Variations. Annals of Vasc Dis. 2:99–105. 1965.

20 

LeMay M and Gooding CA: The clinical significance of the azygos anterior cerebral artery (A.C.A.). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 98:602–610. 1966.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Wollschlaeger G, Wollschlaeger PB, Lucas FV and Lopez VF: Experience and result with postmortem cerebral angiography performed as routine procedure of the autopsy. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 101:68–87. 1967.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Ring BA and Waddington MM: Roentgenographic anatomy of the pericallosal arteries. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 104:109–118. 1968.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Dunker RO and Harris AB: Surgical anatomy of the proximal anterior cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. 44:359–367. 1976.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Tulleken CA: A study of the anatomy of the anterior communicating artery with the aid of the operating microscope. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 80:169–173. 1978.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Ozaki T, Handa H, Tomimoto K and Hazama F: Anatomical variations of the arterial system of the base of the brain. Nihon Geka Hokan. 46:3–17. 1977.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Perlmutter D and Rhoton AL Jr: Microsurgical anatomy of the distal anterior cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. 49:204–228. 1978.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Huber P, Braun J, Hirschmann D and Agyeman JF: Incidence of berry aneurysms of the unpaired pericallosal artery: Angiographic study. Neuroradiology. 19:143–147. 1980.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Kwak R, Niizuma H, Hatanaka M and Suzuki J: Anterior communicating artery aneurysms with associated anomalies. J Neurosurg. 52:162–164. 1980.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Kayembe KN, Sasahara M and Hazama F: Cerebral aneurysms and variations in the circle of Willis. Stroke. 15:846–850. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Gomes FB, Dujovny M, Umansky F, Berman SK, Diaz FG, Ausman JI, Mirchandani HG and Ray WJ: Microanatomy of the anterior cerebral artery. Surg Neurol. 26:129–141. 1986.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Marinković S, Milisavljević M and Marinković Z: Branches of the anterior communicating artery. Microsurgical anatomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 106:78–85. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Ogawa A, Suzuki M, Sakurai Y and Yoshimoto T: Vascular anomalies associated with aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery: Microsurgical observations. J Neurosurg. 72:706–709. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Nathal E, Yasui N, Sampei T and Suzuki A: Intraoperative anatomical studies in patients with aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery complex. J Neurosurg. 76:629–634. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Van der Zwan A, Hillen B, Tulleken CA, Dujovny M and Dragovic L: Variability of the territories of the major cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg. 77:927–940. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Sanders WP, Sorek PA and Mehta BA: Fenestration of intracranial arteries with special attention to associated aneurysms and other anomalies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 14:675–680. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

36 

Macchi C, Catini C, Federico C, Gulisano M, Pacini P, Cecchi F, Corcos L and Brizzi E: Magnetic resonance angiographic evaluation of circulus arteriosus cerebri (circle of Willis): A morphologic study in 100 human healthy subjects. Ital J Anat Embryol. 101:115–123. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

37 

Serizawa T, Saeki N and Yamaura A: Microsurgical anatomy and clinical significance of the anterior communicating artery and its perforating branches. Neurosurgery. 40:1211–1216. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Avci E, Fossett D, Erdogan A, Egemen N, Attar A and Aslan M: Perforating branches of the anomalous anterior communicating complex. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 103:19–22. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Kulenović A, Dilberović F and Ovcina F: Variation in the flow and branching of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries. Med Arh. 57:3–5. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

40 

Paul S and Mishra S: Variations of the anterior cerebral artery in human cadavers: A dissection study. J Anat Soc India. 53:15–16. 2004.

41 

Ugur HC, Kahilogullari G, Coscarella E, Unlu A, Tekdemir I, Morcos JJ, Elhan A and Baskaya MK: Arterial vascularization of primary motor cortex (precentral gyrus). Surg Neurol. 64 (Suppl 2):S48–S52. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Tao X, Yu XJ, Bhattarai B, Li TH, Jin H, Wei GW, Ming JS, Ren W and Jiong C: Microsurgical anatomy of the anterior communicating artery complex in adult Chinese heads. Surg Neurol. 65:155–161. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Uchino A, Nomiyama K, Takase Y and Kudo S: Anterior cerebral artery variations detected by MR angiography. Neuroradiology. 48:647–652. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Ugur HC, Kahilogullari G, Esmer AF, Comert A, Odabasi AB, Tekdemir I, Elhan A and Kanpolat Y: A neurosurgical view of anatomical variations of the distal anterior cerebral artery: An anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 104:278–284. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Bharatha A, Aviv RI, White J, Fox AJ and Symons SP: Intracranial arterial fenestrations: Frequency on CT angiography and association with other vascular lesions. Surg Radiol Anat. 30:397–401. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Kahilogullari G, Comert A, Arslan M, Esmer AF, Tuccar E, Elhan A, Tubbs RS and Ugur HC: Callosal branches of the anterior cerebral artery: An anatomical report. Clin Anat. 21:383–388. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Saidi H, Kitunguu PK and Ogeng'O JA: Variant anatomy of the anterior cerebral artery in adult brains. Afr J Neurol Scie. 27:97–105. 2008.

48 

Zurada A, Gielecki J, Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol AA, Chlebiej M, Maksymowicz W, Nowak D, Zawiliński J and Michalak M: Three-dimensional morphometry of the A2 segment of the anterior cerebral artery with neurosurgical relevance. Clin Anat. 23:759–769. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Nordon DG and Rodrigues OF: Variations in the brain circulation-the circle of Willis. J Morphol Sci. 29:243–247. 2012.

50 

Swetha B: Anatomic features of distal anterior cerebral artery supply on corpus callosum: A detailed study on 140 cerebral hemispheres. J Neurol Sci (Turkish). 29:46–56. 2012.

51 

Gunnal S: Variations of anterior cerebral artery in human cadavers. Neurology Asia. 18:249–259. 2013.

52 

Hamidi C, Bükte Y, Hattapoğlu S, Ekici F, Tekbaş G, Önder H, Gümüş H and Bilici A: Display with 64-detector MDCT angiography of cerebral vascular variations. Surg Radiol Anat. 35:729–736. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Stefani MA, Schneider FL, Marrone ACH and Severino AG: Influence of the gender on cerebral vascular diameters observed during the magnetic resonance angiographic examination of willis circle. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 56:45–52. 2013.

54 

Cilliers K, Vorster W and Page BJ: The anatomical variation of the circulus arteriosus cerebri in a cadaver cohort representing the population dynamics of the Western Cape. Br J Neurosurg. 32:61–67. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Wan-Yin S, Ming-Hua L, Bin-Xian G, Yong-Dong L and Hua-Qiao T: Azygous anterior cerebral artery and associated aneurysms: Detection and identification using 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. J Neuroimaging. 24:18–22. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

López-Sala P, Alberdi N, Mendigaña M, Bacaicoa MC and Cabada T: Anatomical variants of anterior communicating artery complex. A study by computerized tomographic angiography. J Clin Neurosci. 80:182–187. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Nutik S and Dilenge D: Carotid-anterior cerebral artery anastomosis. Case report. J Neurosurg. 44:378–382. 1976.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Huh JS, Park SK, Shin JJ and Kim TH: Saccular aneurysm of the azygos anterior cerebral artery: Three case reports. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 42:342–345. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Tahir RA, Haider S, Kole M, Griffith B and Marin H: Anterior cerebral artery: Variant anatomy and pathology. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 10:16–22. 2019.PubMed/NCBI

60 

Lasjaunias P, Brugge KG and Berenstein A: Surgical neuroangiography. Vol 3. Springer, Berlin, 2006.

61 

Pekcevik Y, Hasbay E and Oncel D: Colloid cyst of the third ventricle associated with anterior cerebral artery trifurcation and agenesis of the corpus callosum: Findings on MRI and CT angiography. Pediatr Radiol. 42:1130–1133. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-October 2024
Volume 4 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 2754-3242
Online ISSN:2754-1304

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Fotakopoulos G, Brotis AG, Fotakopoulou O, Gatos C, Mantzarlis K, Georgakopoulou VE, Sklapani P, Trakas N and Fountas KN: Prevalence of ACA variations: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Med Int 4: 54, 2024.
APA
Fotakopoulos, G., Brotis, A.G., Fotakopoulou, O., Gatos, C., Mantzarlis, K., Georgakopoulou, V.E. ... Fountas, K.N. (2024). Prevalence of ACA variations: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Medicine International, 4, 54. https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.178
MLA
Fotakopoulos, G., Brotis, A. G., Fotakopoulou, O., Gatos, C., Mantzarlis, K., Georgakopoulou, V. E., Sklapani, P., Trakas, N., Fountas, K. N."Prevalence of ACA variations: A systematic review and meta‑analysis". Medicine International 4.5 (2024): 54.
Chicago
Fotakopoulos, G., Brotis, A. G., Fotakopoulou, O., Gatos, C., Mantzarlis, K., Georgakopoulou, V. E., Sklapani, P., Trakas, N., Fountas, K. N."Prevalence of ACA variations: A systematic review and meta‑analysis". Medicine International 4, no. 5 (2024): 54. https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.178