Effects of cyclin E gene silencing on the proliferation of esophageal cancer cell lines, EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30

Retraction in: /10.3892/mmr.2018.8406

  • Authors:
    • Na Wang
    • Min Li
    • Wen-Qiao Zang
    • Yun-Yun Ma
    • Yuan-Yuan Wang
    • Guo-Qiang Zhao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 18, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1280
  • Pages: 799-804
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

In order to observe the effects of cyclin E gene silencing by small interfering RNA (siRNA) on the growth, proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of esophageal cancer cell lines, including EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30, siRNA vectors targeting cyclin E gene were constructed and then transfected into the EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 human esophageal cancer cell lines. Cyclin E mRNA and protein expression were determined by RT-PCR and western blotting. Cell proliferation and clonality were detected using a CCK-8 test and soft agar colony formation assay. Cell cycle distribution, apoptosis and invasion of EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 cells were evaluated with flow cytometry and a transwell culture system. After siRNA vectors targeting the cyclin E gene were transfected into EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 cell lines, compared with blank and negative control groups, the expression of cyclin E mRNA and protein (P<0.01), colony-forming units and the number of cells penetrating the transwell membrane (P<0.05) were significantly decreased, the cells in the S and G2/M phase were reduced, the cells in the G0/G1 phase were increased and the apoptosis rate was increased (P<0.01) in the experimental groups. Cyclin E gene silencing effectively inhibits growth, proliferation and invasion of esophageal cancer cells.

Introduction

Esophageal cancer, a type of gastrointestinal malignancy, is common in China. Its morbidity and mortality rank first in the world, particularly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (1). In esophageal cancer there is usually high expression of cyclin E, indicating that high expression of cyclin E is associated with esophageal cancer (2). We speculate that cyclin E gene silencing by small interfering RNA (siRNA) is likely to inhibit esophageal cancer cell proliferation, which may provide a new method for inhibiting the growth and metastasis of esophageal cancer cells. In this study, siRNA vectors targeting the cyclin E gene were transfected into EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 human esophageal cancer cell lines, and the effects of cyclin E gene silencing on growth, proliferation and invasion of esophageal cancer cells were observed.

Materials and methods

Construction of siRNA vectors targeting cyclin E

The double-stranded oligonucleotide siCE951 encoding the corresponding shRNA was synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Co., Ltd. (China) according to the nucleotide fragment of the cyclin E mRNA sequence (NM 057182.1) 951–969 with BamHI and HindIII incision enzyme residues on both ends, respectively. The synthetic oligonucleotide chain was inserted into the pRNA-U6.1/Neo vector (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) between the BamHI and HindIII sites, and then transformed into E. coli DH5α for incubation. The recombinant plasmid was extracted followed by sequencing to confirm the insertion sequence. The recombinant vector pRNA-U6.1/Neo-siCE951 was obtained.

Cell culture and transfection

EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cell lines were placed in a 24-well plate at 2×105 cells per well in order to be incubated in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. When cell adhesion reached 90–95%, pRNA-U6.1/Neo-siCE951 and pRNA-U6.1/Neo-Con plasmids were respectively transfected into EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 cells using Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The study included experimental groups transfected with pRNA-U6.1/Neo-siCE951 plasmid, negative control groups transfected with pRNA-U6.1/Neo-Con plasmid and blank control groups transfected only with liposomes. Twelve hours after transfection, the medium was replaced by complete medium containing 600 μg/ml G418 for 4-week culture at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in order to obtain stably transfected cells for future use.

Cyclin E mRNA expression detected by RT-PCR

Total RNA from each group was extracted using Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The cyclin E mRNA in each group was amplified with a One Step SYBP PrimeScript® RT-PCR kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). The amplification primers of cyclin E were 5′-CGGGTCCACAGGGATGCGAAGGA-3′ and 5′-CAG GTGTGGGGATCAGGGAGCA-3′. The amplification primers of internal control GAPDH were 5′-GCCTTCCGTGTC CCCACTGC-3′ and 5′-CAATGCCAGCCCCAGCGTCA-3′. Amplification reaction conditions were: pre-denaturing at 94°C for 20 sec and 60°C for 60 sec, for 40 cycles. Amplification was performed 5 times for each sample. The relative expression level of cyclin E mRNA was indicated with the ratio of cyclin E to internal control GAPDH.

Cyclin E protein expression detected by western blotting

Cell disruption was performed with RIPA for protein extraction. The protein concentration in the supernatant was determined using the Bradford method to adjust the protein load. The protein sample underwent SDS-PAGE, and was then transferred to a membrane. The membrane was sealed in 25 ml of fresh nonfat dry milk for 1 h followed by the addition of 1:800 mouse anti-cyclin E monoclonal antibody and mouse anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), for a 1- or 2-h incubation at room temperature. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:2000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) was added for 1-h incubation followed by coloration. The gray values of western blot bands were determined with Kodak Digital ID Image analysis software. The relative expression level of cyclin E protein was indicated with the gray value ratio of cyclin E to internal control GAPDH.

Cell proliferation

EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cell lines were placed in a 96-well plate at 1×104 cells per well with 5 wells for each group. The absorbance value of each well was determined using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Shanghai, China), and then the average absorbance value was calculated. The cell growth curve in each group was drawn with incubation time as the horizontal axis and with OD value as the vertical axis.

Analysis of the cell cycle using flow cytometry

Cells in the logarithmic growth phase were placed in a 6-well plate at a density of 1×106 cells per well. After trypsinization, the cells were centrifuged at 800 rpm for 15 min for cell collection. The cells were resuspended in 0.4 ml PBS followed by addition of 0.7 ml absolute alcohol containing 3% serum for fixation at 4°C for 24 h. RNase-A was added to a final concentration of 50 μg/ml for digestion in a water bath for 30 min at 37°C. Propidium iodide (PI, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to a final concentration of 65 μg/ml for staining in an ice bath for 30 min away from light. After filtration with 300-screen nylon mesh, the cells were observed with a flow cytometer. The amount of cells in the G0/G1, S and G2/M phases were calculated. Testing was performed in triplicate in each group.

Apoptosis detected with Annexin V/PI double-staining flow cytometry

The cells were collected by centrifugation, and then washed three times with 1 ml cold PBS. After centrifugation, the cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. After cell collection, the cells were resuspended. PI was added for staining in an ice bath for 5 min away from light. The cells were washed with PBS and then observed with a flow cytometer.

Soft agar colony formation assay

Agarose (1.2%) and 2X RPMI-1640 medium were mixed (at a ratio of 1:1) in a petri dish, and then 2X antibiotics and 20% of fetal calf serum were added. Agarose (0.7%) and 2X DMEM medium were mixed (1:1), followed by addition of 0.2 ml cells (5×103/ml), which were added into the petri dish mentioned above for a 10- to 14-day incubation. Ten fields were selected to count the colony-forming units (number of cells >50 was counted as a colony-forming unit) under an inverted microscope in each group.

Transwell culture system

The cells were adjusted at 2×105/ml in each group 48 h following transfection. The upper chamber of 24-well Transwell Permeable Supports with 8-μm pores (Corning Cat. no. 3422) was loaded with 200 μl cell suspension, and the lower chamber was loaded with 500 μl medium containing 10% serum for incubation in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C for 48 h. Five wells were set up for each group. The cells on the Matrigel and in the upper chamber were collected using cotton swabs. Ten fields were selected to be observed under a microscope and the mean was calculated.

Statistical analysis

Statistical treatment was performed with SPSS 16.0 software. All data are expressed as the means ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used for data analysis. Statistical significance was established at P<0.05.

Results

Construction of siRNA vectors targeting cyclin E

Recombinant vectors were transformed and transfected bacteria were obtained. Sequencing for the target gene in the recombinant plasmid was performed. Results of sequencing were consistent with the hairpin single-strand DNA that had been designed, demonstrating that recombinant vectors were successfully constructed.

Cyclin E mRNA expression detected using RT-PCR in transfected cells of each group

After siRNA vectors were transfected into EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 cells, the level of cyclin E mRNA expression was detected with fluorescence-quantitative PCR in each group. Results indicated that compared with the control groups, the level of cyclin E mRNA expression was significantly decreased in each experimental group (P<0.01, Fig. 1), demonstrating that cyclin E mRNA expression was significantly inhibited in EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cells.

Cyclin E protein expression detected by western blotting

Western blotting revealed the specific band at 54 kDa in the experimental groups and blank and negative control groups (Fig. 2). The western blot was significantly stronger in the blank and negative control groups than in the experimental groups, demonstrating that the designed siRNA vectors targeting cyclin E gene effectively interfered with cyclin E protein expression in EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cells.

Cell proliferation

Cell growth curves are shown in Fig. 3. There was no significant difference in absorbance values between the blank and negative control groups (P>0.05). Compared with the blank and negative control groups, the absorbance values on the third, fourth and fifth day were significantly decreased in the experimental groups (P<0.05), demonstrating that inhibition of cyclin E expression can decrease the growth velocity of EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cells.

Cell cycle detected with flow cytometry

The status of the cell cycle is shown in Fig. 4. Compared with the blank and negative control groups, the number of cells in the S and G2/M phases were reduced and the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase were increased in experimental groups (P<0.05), demonstrating that inhibiting cyclin E expression inhibits the cell cycle process, namely that the number of cells in the S and G2/M phases are reduced and the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase are increased in EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cells.

Apoptosis detected using Annexin V/PI double-staining flow cytometry

The early apoptosis rates were 10.67% in EC9706 cells, 11.7% in Eca109 cells and 13.83% in KYSE30 cells, and they were all significantly higher than that in the blank and negative control groups (P<0.01, Fig. 5).

Soft agar colony formation assay

The average number of colony-forming units in the experimental groups and the blank and negative control groups are shown in Fig. 6. There was no significant difference in the average number of colony-forming units between the blank and negative control groups (P>0.05). Compared with the blank and negative control groups, the average number of colony-forming units was significantly decreased in the experimental groups (P<0.05), demonstrating that inhibition of cyclin E expression decreases the number of colony-forming units in EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cells.

Results of the transwell culture system

The average numbers of cells penetrating the transwell membrane in the experimental groups and the blank and negative control groups are shown in Fig. 7. There was no significant difference in the average number of cells penetrating the transwell membrane between the blank and negative control groups (P>0.05). Compared with the blank and negative control groups, the average number of cells penetrating the transwell membrane was significantly decreased in the experimental groups (P<0.05), demonstrating that inhibition of cyclin E expression decreases the invasive ability of EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cells.

Discussion

Carcinogenesis is a complex, multi-factor, multi-stage and multi-step process (35). One of the important mechanisms of carcinogenesis involves disorder of the cell cycle leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation (6,7). The cell cycle, a highly ordered process, is regulated by a variety of proteins, and cyclins are important in ensuring a normal cell cycle occurs (8,9). Previously, studies on the pathogenesis of esophageal cancer have mainly focused on environmental, nutritional and genetic factors (1012). In recent years, great progress has been made in studies on the pathogenesis of esophageal cancer at the molecular level. It has been confirmed that the genes related to esophageal cancer include P53, cyclin D1, VEGF, GPR39, Wnt-1 and cyclin E(1318). Cyclin E, a type of G1 cyclin, was first discovered by Koff et al in 1991 (19). Cyclin E promotes cell cycle G1/S transition and cell division along with CDK2 (20). Under normal conditions, cyclin E begins to be synthesized in G1 metaphase, reaches a peak in the G1/S phase, and rapidly descends in the S phase; and cyclin E expression is strictly regulated by cells. In abnormal conditions, a variety of factors lead to cyclin E overexpression, which activates its downstream protein to allow cell over-proliferation, leading to tumor formation (2123).

RNA interference technology can specifically block or reduce the expression of the target gene and plays a role in inhibiting tumor growth (2427). It has been reported that siRNA targeting cyclin E gene silencing effectively inhibits cancer cell growth (2831).

Based on our results, we believe that cyclin E silencing significantly decreases the expression of cyclin E mRNA and protein in EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 esophageal cancer cells, which further inhibits overactivity of its downstream proteins and induces cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase, inhibiting cancer cell division and retarding cancer cell growth. The transwell assay indicated that cyclin E silencing decreased the invasive ability of esophageal cancer cells, which may be associated with the fact that cyclin E silencing decreases the expression of cancer cell metastasis-related molecules. The correlation between cyclin E and cancer cell invasion remains to be further studied. This study provides an experimental basis for exploring the pathogenesis and targeted therapy of esophageal cancer.

References

1 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:10–29. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Fujii S, Tominaga O, Nagawa H, Tsuno N, Nita ME, Tsuruo T and Muto T: Quantitative analysis of the cyclin expression in human esophageal cancer cell lines. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 7:491–496. 1998.

3 

Meng X, Zhong J, Liu S, Murray M and Gonzalez-Angulo AM: A new hypothesis for the cancer mechanism. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 31:247–268. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Meng X and Riordan NH: Cancer is a functional repair tissue. Med Hypotheses. 66:486–490. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Erdman SE and Poutahidis T: Cancer inflammation and regulatory T cells. Int J Cancer. 127:768–779. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Satyanarayana A and Kaldis P: Mammalian cell-cycle regulation: several Cdks, numerous cyclins and diverse compensatory mechanisms. Oncogene. 28:2925–2939. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Sánchez I and Dynlacht BD: New insights into cyclins, CDKs, and cell cycle control. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 16:311–321. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Stamatakos M, Palla V, Karaiskos I, Xiromeritis K, Alexiou I, Pateras I and Kontzoglou K: Cell cyclins: triggering elements of cancer or not? World J Surg Oncol. 8:1112010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Malumbres M and Barbacid M: To cycle or not cycle: a critical decision in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 1:222–231. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Berretta M, Lleshi A, Fisichella R, Berretta S, Basile F, Li Volti G, Bolognese A, Biondi A, De Paoli P, Tirelli U and Cappellani A: The role of nutrition in the development of esophageal cancer: what do we know? Front Biosci. 4:351–357. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Chen YK, Lee CH, Wu IC, Liu JS, Wu DC, Lee JM, Goan YG, Chou SH, Huang CT, Lee CY, Hung HC, Yang JF and Wu MT: Food intake and the occurrence of squamous cell carcinoma in different sections of the esophagus in Taiwanese men. Nutrition. 25:753–761. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Islami F, Boffetta P, Ren JS, Pedoeim L, Khatib D and Kamangar F: High-temperature beverages and foods and esophageal cancer risk - a systematic review. Int J Cancer. 125:491–524. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Taghavi N, Biramijamal F, Sotoudeh M, Khademi H, Malekzadeh R, Moaven O, Memar B, A’rabi A and Abbaszadegan MR: p16INK4a hypermethylation and p53, p16 and MDM2 protein expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 10:1382010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Shimada H, Matsushita K and Tagawa M: Recent advances in esophageal cancer gene therapy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 14:3–8. 2008.

15 

Shimada H, Matsubara H and Ochiai T: p53 gene therapy for esophageal cancer. J Gastroenterol. 37(Suppl 14): 87–91. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Xie F, Liu H, Zhu YH, Qin YR, Dai Y, Zeng T, Chen L, Nie C, Tang H, Li Y, Fu L and Guan XY: Overexpression of GPR39 contributes to malignant development of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 11:862011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Tanaka T, Ishiguro H, Kuwabara Y, Kimura M, Mitsui A, Katada T, Shiozaki M, Naganawa Y, Fujii Y and Takeyama H: Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) in esophageal cancer correlates with lymph node metastasis and poor patient prognosis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 29:832010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

He J, Sheng T, Stelter AA, Li C, Zhang X, Sinha M, Luxon BA and Xie J: Suppressing Wnt signaling by the hedgehog pathway through sFRP-1. J Biol Chem. 281:35598–35602. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Koff A, Cross F, Fisher A, Schumacher J, Leguellec K, Philippe M and Roberts JM: Human cyclin E, a new cyclin that interacts with two members of the CDC2 gene family. Cell. 66:1217–1228. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Sauer K and Lehner CF: The role of cyclin E in the regulation of entry into S phase. Prog Cell Cycle Res. 1:125–139. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Mazumder S, Plesca D and Almasan A: A jekyll and hyde role of cyclin E in the genotoxic stress response: switching from cell cycle control to apoptosis regulation. Cell Cycle. 6:1437–1442. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Schildkraut JM, Moorman PG, Bland AE, Halabi S, Calingaert B, Whitaker R, Lee PS, Elkins-Williams T, Bentley RC, Marks JR and Berchuck A: Cyclin E overexpression in epithelial ovarian cancer characterizes an etiologic subgroup. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 17:585–593. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Zhou YJ, Xie YT, Gu J, Yan L, Guan GX and Liu X: Overexpression of cyclin E isoforms correlates with poor prognosis in rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 37:1078–1084. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Sharp PA: RNA interference: 2001. Genes Dev. 15:485–490. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Hannon GJ: RNA interference. Nature. 418:244–251. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K and Tuschl T: Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 411:494–498. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

McCaffrey AP, Meuse L, Pham TT, Conklin DS, Hannon GJ and Kay MA: RNA interference in adult mice. Nature. 418:38–39. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kim DH and Rossi JJ: Strategies for silencing human disease using RNA interference. Nat Rev Genet. 8:173–184. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Jankovic R, Radulovic S and Brankovic-Magic M: siRNA and miRNA for the treatment of cancer. J BUON. 14(Suppl 1): S43–S49. 2009.

30 

Gondi CS and Rao JS: Concepts in in vivo siRNA delivery for cancer therapy. J Cell Physiol. 220:285–291. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Liang Y, Gao H, Lin SY, Goss JA, Brunicardi FC and Li K: siRNA-based targeting of cyclin E overexpression inhibits breast cancer cell growth and suppresses tumor development in breast cancer mouse model. PLoS One. 5:e128602010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March 2013
Volume 7 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang N, Li M, Zang W, Ma Y, Wang Y and Zhao G: Effects of cyclin E gene silencing on the proliferation of esophageal cancer cell lines, EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2018.8406. Mol Med Rep 7: 799-804, 2013.
APA
Wang, N., Li, M., Zang, W., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhao, G. (2013). Effects of cyclin E gene silencing on the proliferation of esophageal cancer cell lines, EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2018.8406. Molecular Medicine Reports, 7, 799-804. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1280
MLA
Wang, N., Li, M., Zang, W., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, G."Effects of cyclin E gene silencing on the proliferation of esophageal cancer cell lines, EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2018.8406". Molecular Medicine Reports 7.3 (2013): 799-804.
Chicago
Wang, N., Li, M., Zang, W., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, G."Effects of cyclin E gene silencing on the proliferation of esophageal cancer cell lines, EC9706, Eca109 and KYSE30 Retraction in /10.3892/mmr.2018.8406". Molecular Medicine Reports 7, no. 3 (2013): 799-804. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1280