DNA integrity is a critical molecular indicator for the assessment of male infertility

Omran,Huda  Mossa; Bakhiet,Moiz; Dashti,Mariam  Ghloom

doi:10.3892/mmr.2013.1390

DNA integrity is a critical molecular indicator for the assessment of male infertility

Authors:
- Huda Mossa Omran
- Moiz Bakhiet
- Mariam Ghloom Dashti
View Affiliations

Affiliations: College of Higher Education, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain, Department of Molecular Medicine, Princess Al‑Jawhara Center for Genetics and Inherited Diseases, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain
Published online on: March 21, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1390
Pages: 1631-1635

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Traditional semen analysis is routinely used for the assessment of male infertility. The present study aimed to evaluate the application of molecular techniques in determining the DNA integrity of the spermatozoa of infertile men in comparison to conventional analysis. Semen samples from 52 infertile patients were analyzed by conventional assays, flow cytometry (FCM) analysis for sperm DNA integrity and colorimetric assays for total antioxidant capacity (TAC). The traditional semen analyses showed that 48.1% of the patients had normospermic samples. The figure decreased to only 25% following the application of molecular tests. DNA FCM revealed that 67.3% of the patients had an abnormal chromatin status (n=36), while at the same time, 36% showed aneuploidy features (n=19), and 59.6% had an abnormal TAC level (n=31). The normozoospermic samples had less DNA fragmentation and a higher mean seminal plasma TAC level (1,500.92±280.29 µM) than the abnormal samples (899.59±375.67 µM). Significant correlations were noted between chromatin condensation and the sperm count (r=587, P<0.001), motility (r=0.625, P<0.001), normal morphology (r=0.658, P<0.001) and white blood cell (WBC) count (r=‑0.299, P<0.005). In addition, the infertile subjects with abnormal chromatin condensation had significantly lower TAC levels than the other subjects and the level was markedly decreased in the samples with severe abnormalities (class 7 and 8). The presence of the aneuploidy cells was negatively correlated with the sperm concentration (r=‑0.339, P<0.005). In conclusion, traditional semen analysis has limited value in the prediction of male fertility and should be combined with other molecular tests to increase its sensitivity.

View Figures

View References

1	Sharma RS, Gaur KK, Pal PC, Manocha M, Tomar D, Khan AA, et al: Semen characteristics: Advancement in andrological assessment. Indian J Clin Biochem. 20:173–183. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	Tremellen K: Oxidative stress and male infertility - a clinical perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 14:243–258. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Makker K, Agarwal A and Sharma R: Oxidative stress and male infertility. Indian J Med Res. 129:357–367. 2009.
4	Mahfouz R, Sharma R, Lackner J, Aziz N and Agarwal A: Evaluation of chemiluminescence and flow cytometry as tools in assessing production of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion in human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 92:819–827. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Eskenazi B, Kidd SA, Marks AR, Sloter E, Block G and Wyrobek AJ: Antioxidant intake is associated with semen quality in healthy men. Hum Reprod. 20:1006–1012. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Nallella KP, Thomas AJ Jr, Alvarez Jg and Sikka SC: Reactive oxygen species as an independent marker of male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 86:878–885. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Pasqualotto FF, Sundaram A, Sharma RK, Borges E Jr, Pasqualotto EB and Agarwal A: Semen quality and oxidative stress scores in fertile and infertile patients with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 89:602–607. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Varghese AC, Bragais FM, Mukhopadahyay D, Kundu S, Pal M, Bhattacharyya AK and Agarwal A: Human sperm DNA integrity in normal and abnormal semen samples and its correlation with sperm characterstics. Andrologia. 41:207–215. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Carrell DT, Emery BR and Hammoud S: Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link? Hum Reprod Update. 13:313–327. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Evenson DP and Wixon R: Clincal aspects of sperm DNA fragmentation detection and male infertility. Theriogenology. 65:979–991. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, Erenpreiss J and Giwercman A: Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod. 22:174–179. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Prisant N, Escalier D, Soufir JC, Morillon M, Schoevaert D, Misrahi M and Tachdjian G: Ultrastructural nuclear defects and increased chromosome aneuploidies in spermatozoa with elongated heads. Hum Reprod. 22:1052–1059. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Ehemann V, Sykora J, Vera-Delgado J, Lange A and Otto HF: Flow cytometric detection of spontaneous apoptosis in human breast cancer using the TUNEL-technique. Cancer Lett. 194:125–131. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Hacker-Klom UB, Göhde W, Nieschlag E and Behre HM: DNA flow cytometry of human semen. Hum Reprod. 14:2506–2512. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Said TM, Kattal N, Sharma RK, Sikka SC, Thomas AJ Jr, Mascha E and Agarwal A: Enhanced chemiluminescence assay vs colorimetric assay for measurement of the total antioxidant capacity of human seminal plasma. J Androl. 24:676–680. 2003.
16	Aziz N and Agarwal A: Evaluation of sperm damage: beyond the World Health Organization criteria. Fertil Steril. 90:484–485. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Aitken RJ, Baker MA and O’Bryan M: Shedding light on chemiluminescence:the application of chemiluminescence in diagnostic andrology. J Androl. 25:455–465. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
18	Marcus-Braun N, Braun G, Potashnik G and Har-Vardi I: Effect of cryopreservation on quality and fertilization capacity of human sperm. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 116:63–66. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Agarwala A and Allamaneni SS: The effect of sperm DNA damage on assisted reproduction outcomes. A review Minerva Ginecol. 56:235–245. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
20	Zini A and Sigman M: Are tests of sperm DNA damage clinically useful? Pros and cons. J Androl. 30:219–229. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Elshal M, El-Sayed IH, Elsaied MA, El-Masry SA and Kumosani TA: Sperm head defects and disturbances in spermatozoal chromatin and DNA integrities in idiopathic infertile subjects: association with cigarette smoking. Clin Biochem. 42:589–594. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Trisini AT, Singh NP, Duty SM and Hauser R: Relationship between human semen parameters and deoxyribonucleic acid damage assessed by the neutral comet assay. Fertil Steril. 82:1623–1632. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Rubes J, Vozdova M, Robbins WA, Rezacova O, Perreault SD and Wyrobek AJ: Stable variants of sperm aneuploidy among healthy men show associations between germinal and somatic aneuploidy. Am J Hum Genet. 70:1507–1519. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Matzuk MM and Lamb DJ: Genetic dissection of mammalian fertility pathways. Nat Cell Biol. 4(Suppl): S41–S49. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Vegetti W, Van Assche E, Frias A, et al: Correlation between semen parameters and sperm aneuploidy rates investigated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in infertile men. Hum Reprod. 15:351–365. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
26	Calogero AE, De Palma A, Grazioso C, Barone N, Romeo R, Rapazzo G and D’Agata R: Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with abnormal semen parameters. Hum Reprod. 16:1172–1179. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Sharma RK, Pasqualotto AE, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ Jr and Agarwal A: Relationship between seminal white blood cell counts and oxidative stress in men treated at an infertility clinic. J Androl. 22:575–583. 2001.
28	Aitken S and Roman SD: Antioxidative system and oxidative stress in the testis. Molecular mechanisms in Spermatogenesis. Cheng CY: Landes Bioscience; New York: 2008