Urine tenascin‑C is an independent risk factor for bladder cancer patients
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 18, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1873
- Pages: 961-966
Abstract
Introduction
In total, >350,000 novel bladder cancer cases are diagnosed worldwide each year (2012), and the majority (>90%) of these are transitional cell carcinomas (1), 70% of which are diagnosed as superficial tumors (Ta, T1 or Tis). Despite previous refinement of various therapeutic strategies, including surgery, intravesical chemotherapy and combination therapy, 50–70% of those superficial tumors are likely to recur (2). As bladder cancer is a relatively common and potentially life-threatening neoplasm, predicting and monitoring the condition is usually a lifelong process using complicated methods (3). Cystoscopy is the primary diagnostic method for bladder cancer as it is reasonably accurate, however, it is also invasive and relatively expensive (4). Urine cytology is highly specific in detecting bladder carcinoma, but it has a low sensitivity in detecting low- to intermediate-grade bladder cancer (5). The lifelong follow-up of patients by invasive cystoscopy with high costs and by cytology with low sensitivity emphasizes the pressing requirement for a urinary biomarker that offers a non-invasive method for the detection of recurrence and for stratifying patients with a high-risk profile.
Tenascin-C (TN-C), an extracellular matrix glycoprotein, exhibits a morphoregulatory role in fetal development and tissue remodeling (6). Recently, accumulating evidence has indicated a supportive role for TN-C in tumor growth, metastasis (7), tumor angiogenesis (8) and the inhibition of immune surveillance (6). In certain tumor types, including breast cancer, glioma and osteosarcoma, high TN-C expression provides a poor patient survival prognosis (6). In patients with bladder cancer, a diffuse TN-C staining pattern in the tumor stroma was shown to be significantly associated with a worse overall patient survival rate compared with the rate in those with moderate or negative staining, while patients with cytoplasmic expression of TN-C had a significantly improved overall survival rate compared with those without (9). Most significantly, only the expression of TN-C in invasive bladder cancer was an independent positive prognostic factor for the overall survival rate in the multivariate analysis (9). However, in another study using univariate and multivariate analyses, it was reported that TN-C expression was not an independent prognostic factor for the recurrence and progression in patients with superficial bladder cancer (10). Thus, the correlation between TN-C and bladder cancer recurrence and progression remains unclear and requires further research.
Various splicing variants or splicing domains of TN-C have been demonstrated to exhibit specific biological functions during tumor progression and may have different diagnostic or predictive values (11). In breast cancer, the increased expression of TN-C splicing variants containing the B domain is positively associated with the invasive phenotype. Similarly, the A1 and D domains of TN-C maybe useful for determining individual bladder cancer biological behaviors (12), and detection of TN-C containing the B and C domains in urine may be used as a marker for the surveillance of bladder cancer recurrence and invasiveness (8,9). However, since splicing domains may be independently included in the molecule leading to >9 different TN-C splicing variants, which may play different roles in cell behavior, it remains difficult to analyze all the splicing variants or splicing domains of TN-C for diagnostic or predictive values. Additionally, one study (13) also demonstrated that it may result in wrong prognostic impressions if only one or certain domains are investigated due to the comprehensive effect of all the TN-C isoforms, which may be crucial in tumor development.
In the present study, based on the constant domains of TN-C, the concentration of urine TN-C of bladder cancer patients and volunteers was determined by ELISA analysis. We aimed to demonstrate the discrepancy of urine TN-C in bladder cancer patients vs. volunteers, and the clinical significance of this discrepancy, including tumor grade, stage and prognosis.
Materials and methods
Urine samples
In total, 66 samples of voided urine from patients with bladder cancer, 42 samples from healthy control volunteers and 33 sample from patients who suffered from urinary tract inflammation without tumors who were enrolled between Nov 2008 and Feb 2012 in the Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University (Xi’an, China) were collected. The patient’s ages ranged between 32 and 82 years old, with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 64.7±12.4 years old and a male/female ratio of 44/22. The healthy volunteers had ages ranging between 35 and 75 years old, with a mean ± SD of 65.3±7.4 years old and a male/female ratio of 29/13. All the bladder cancer urine samples were collected following diagnosis and prior to surgery. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Xi’an Jiaotong University and written informed consent was obtained from all the patients/patient’s families.
ELISA analysis
The ELISA kits were obtained from Shanghai Westang Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) to target the constant domain of TN-C. The lowest concentration that may be detected by the kit is <2 ng/ml. ELISA analysis was performed by a blinded investigator and each sample was analyzed at least in triplicate. Among all 66 patients, 48 were followed up for their life status until the end of the study.
Statistical analysis
Student’s t-test was used for analyzing the differences in the TN-C concentrations between the patients and volunteers. A rank correlation was used for evaluating the correlation between the urine TN-C concentration and the tumor grade/stage and the time from bladder cancer diagnosis to recurrence. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the main hazard factor of survival rate among other factors of age, relapse, gender, grade, stage and concentration of TN-C, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for the survival rate analysis. A value of P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Urine concentration of TN-C in bladder cancer patients is higher than in volunteers
All the 66 bladder cancer patients had been diagnosed with bladder cancer for the first time and they had no history of cancerous disease. The clinicopathological data of the bladder cancer patients is listed in Table I. The mean concentration of the TN-C in the voided urine was 0.0630±0.0331 vs. 0.0028±0.0026 for the bladder cancer patients vs. the healthy control volunteers, respectively (P<0.001). The t-test analysis indicated that between the two groups, the concentration of TN-C in their voided urine was markedly different, as shown in Table II and Fig. 1. The results of the present study indicated that the bladder cancer patients had a higher concentration of urine TN-C compared with the healthy volunteers. However, as reported, our results also provide evidence that inflammation contributes to the elevation of urine TN-C (Table VI).
Table VIUrine TN-C in patients with inflammation compared with healthy volunteers and bladder cancer patients. |
Urine concentration of TN-C has a positive correlation with bladder cancer grade and clinical stage
In order to illustrate the correlation between urine TN-C and tumor grade/tumor stage, the urine TN-C concentrations for differing grades and stages are listed, as shown in Table III. From grades 1–3, the urine TN-C concentration (mean ± SD) was 0.0299±0.0100, 0.0592±0.0155 and 0.1061±0.0141 μg/ml, respectively (P<0.05), however, from stages T1 to T3, the urine TN-C concentration was 0.0593±0.0379, 0.0659±0.0259 and 0.0916±0.0263 μg/ml, respectively (P<0.05). The rank correlation analysis indicated that the coefficient between the concentration of TN-C and bladder cancer grade was 0.9050, and this value in bladder cancer stage was 0.3080, which indicates that the urine concentration of TN-C had a more significantly positive correlation with the tumor grade compared with the tumor stage; the P-value was 0.0000103 and 0.0220034, respectively, as shown in Table IV. These results indicate that the urine concentration of TN-C has a positive correlation with the tumor grade and tumor stage, particularly the former.
Table IVCorrelation analysis of urine TN-C concentration with bladder cancer grade/stage and the time from diagnosis to recurrence. |
Urine concentration of TN-C has a negative correlation with the time from bladder cancer diagnosis to recurrence
In order to illustrate the correlation between the urine concentration of TN-C and the time from bladder cancer diagnosis to recurrence, 48 bladder cancer patients were followed up. In total, 16 of these patients exhibited cancer recurrence (33%), and during the follow-up stage, all 16 patients only had one recurrence. The rank correlation analysis indicated that the coefficient between the urine concentration of TN-C and the time from bladder cancer diagnosis to recurrence was −0.8740 (P=0.0003), as shown in Table IV and Fig. 2, indicating that urine TN-C concentration has a negative correlation with the time from bladder cancer diagnosis to recurrence.
Urine TN-C is one of the hazard factors for the prognosis of bladder cancer patients
Among the 48 bladder cancer patients who were followed up, 24 succumbed to bladder cancer (50%), 16 suffered recurrence of the disease (33%) and the other 8 patients remained alive without bladder cancer (16.7%). In the present study, factors, including tumor grade, stage, age and gender of the patient, recurrence and the urine concentration of TN-C, were analyzed to evaluate the risk factors for the survival rate of the patients with bladder cancer. The urine concentration of TN-C was divided into four grades denoted 1, 2, 3 and 4 according to their percentile: 1, min-X25%; 2, X25–X50%; 3, X50–X75%; and 4, 75%-max (X represents the concentration of urine TN-C). The Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that among the six factors, bladder cancer grade, recurrence and urine TN-C were the independent risk factors for the bladder cancer patients, as shown in Table V; the relative ratio (RR) values were 1.7680, 0.1960 and 1.9310, respectively. The survival rate, as affected by urine TN-C concentration, was then focused on as a single risk factor in the 48 bladder cancer patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether their urine TN-C concentration was above or below the mean study value (0.0690 μg/ml), as shown in Fig. 3. The survival rate between the two groups was observed to be significantly different, indicating that urine TN-C is an independent risk factor for bladder cancer patients.
Table VResults of the Cox proportional hazards analysis for the main risk factor for bladder cancer patients [−2ln(L)=126.86]. |
Discussion
The most difficult obstacle to the therapeutics of bladder cancer is the high rate of tumor recurrence and the absence of specific manifestations to monitor using cystoscopy following surgery. Due to the limitations of invasive and expensive cystoscopy (15), numerous urine marker-based tests for bladder cancer have been developed and tested in different populations in the last decades (16), including cytology, ImmunoCyt™, fluorescence in situ hybridization, proteomics, microsatellite analysis and biomarkers, including BTAstat, BTAtrak, NMP22 (17), FDP, Engrailed-2 (18), Apo-I (19) and UPK3A (15). However, all these biomarkers have their own limitations and must be combined with other biomarkers in order to monitor bladder cancer (20). Currently, no single urine marker guides us in monitoring bladder cancer perfectly, and a set of novel markers are required.
TN-C is a main component of the extracellular matrix in solid tumor tissues (21), and is a molecule of ~300 kDa as an intact monomer and up to 1,800 kDa when assembled into a hexamer. The multi-domain molecule consists of an N-terminal assembly domain, followed by 14.5 EGF-like repeats, 8 constant and ≤9 alternatively spliced fibronectin type III repeats and a C-terminal fibrinogen-like globular domain (6); this special mRNA and protein structure is the reason for its complicated and multiple functions, which involve adhesion/anti-adhesion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, proliferation and cell cycle control (6). A growing body of evidence has indicated the vital role of TN-C in breast (7), pancreatic (22), prostate (23,24) and lung cancers (25) as well as squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (26). In bladder cancer, TN-C has been reported to contribute to migration and invasion (9,27); this function depends on its isoforms, which are produced by divergent splicing of the alternative domains, and those isoforms may also be regarded as prognostic markers of bladder cancer (12,28). In the present study, ELISA kits were used to target the constant splicing domains in order to detect all the isoforms of TN-C in the urine samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study focused on all the isoforms of urine TN-C and the correlation between urine TN-C and bladder cancer grade/stage. The urine TN-C concentration was revealed to be positively associated with the tumor stage and histological grade, which is consistent with a previous study performed in bladder cancer tissues (28). Additionally, the rank correlation analysis also indicated that the urine TN-C concentration had a negative correlation with the time from bladder cancer diagnosis to recurrence, indicating that a higher urine TN-C concentration may be a predictor for bladder cancer recurrence. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that urine TN-C may be regarded as an independent risk factor for the prognosis of bladder cancer, and the Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that urine TN-C, as a single risk factor, is vital in the survival rate of bladder cancer patients.
The present study mainly focused on the total isoforms of TN-C containing the constant domain, but not the specific alternative domain, which is different from the studies previously reported (29). Based on numerous investigations, the superiority of the present study may be attributed to the following points: The exact numbers of functional isoforms that contribute to the progression of bladder cancer remain unclear. The functional isoforms of TN-C may be far beyond the numbers observed in this study. Therefore, targeting one or several specific isoforms of urine TN-C may lead to an underestimation of the actual correlation between TN-C and cancer progression. Furthermore, the concentration of urine TN-C is measured at the nanogram level. Detection of the specific isoforms of TN-C magnifies the random error on this level, since it is too low to be detected perfectly. Detection targeting to the isoform containing the constant domain may provide more accurate results due to its higher concentration compared with any specific isoforms. Additionally, the specificity of the antibodies targeting specific isoforms may also result in false-positive or false-negative errors.
There is another point that is worth noting. The expression of TN-C may be affected by numerous factors (6), including wound healing and inflammation, and the data in Table VI also indicated that the urine TN-C of the patients with infection of the urinary tract was significantly elevated. Therefore, a diagnosis of inflammation/infection must first be excluded when using the urine TN-C concentration for predicting the prognosis of the bladder cancer patients.
In conclusion, the present study indicated that the voided urine concentration of TN-C in bladder cancer patients is significantly elevated and correlated with the progression of the tumor grade and stage, and that elevated urine TN-C concentration may be an independent life-threatening factor for bladder cancer patients. The present study thus provides a potentially useful prognostic marker for patients with bladder cancer and indicates that TN-C concentration merits further investigation.
Acknowledgements
This study was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81101936).
References
Griffiths TR: Action on Bladder Cancer: Current perspectives in bladder cancer management. Int J Clin Pract. 67:435–448. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaufman DS, Shipley WU and Feldman AS: Bladder cancer. Lancet. 374:239–249. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Al Hussain TO and Akhtar M: Molecular basis of urinary bladder cancer. Adv Anat Pathol. 20:53–60. 2013. | |
Kausch I and Böhle A: Bladder cancer. II Molecular aspects and diagnosis. Eur Urol. 39:498–506. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lokeshwar VB, Schroeder GL, Selzer MG, et al: Bladder tumor markers for monitoring recurrence and screening comparison of hyaluronic acid-hyaluronidase and BTA-Stat tests. Cancer. 95:61–72. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Orend G and Chiquet-Ehrismann R: Tenascin-C induced signaling in cancer. Cancer Lett. 244:143–163. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oskarsson T, Acharyya S, Zhang XH, et al: Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs. Nat Med. 17:867–874. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berndt A, Köllner R, Richter P, et al: A comparative analysis of oncofetal fibronectin and tenascin-C incorporation in tumour vessels using human recombinant SIP format antibodies. Histochem Cell Biol. 133:467–475. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Brunner A, Mayerl C, Tzankov A, et al: Prognostic significance of tenascin-C expression in superficial and invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Pathol. 57:927–931. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ioachim E, Michael M, Stavropoulos NE, Kitsiou E, Salmas M and Malamou-Mitsi V: A clinicopathological study of the expression of extracellular matrix components in urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int. 95:655–659. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hancox RA, Allen MD, Holliday DL, et al: Tumour-associated tenascin-C isoforms promote breast cancer cell invasion and growth by matrix metalloproteinase-dependent and independent mechanisms. Breast Cancer Res. 11:R242009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wunderlich H, Berndt A, Anger K, et al: A1 and D domain of tenascin C - New prognostic marker in bladder cancer. J Urology. 179:3152008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fischer D, Brown-Lüdi M, Schulthess T and Chiquet-Ehrismann R: Concerted action of tenascin-C domains in cell adhesion, anti-adhesion and promotion of neurite outgrowth. J Cel Sci. 110:1513–1522 | |
Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, et al: EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 54:303–314. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goodison S, Rosser CJ and Urquidi V: Bladder cancer detection and monitoring: assessment of urine- and blood-based marker tests. Mol Diagn Ther. 17:71–84. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van Rhijn BW, van der Poel HG and van der Kwast TH: Urine markers for bladder cancer surveillance: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 47:736–748. 2005. | |
Jeong S, Park Y, Cho Y, Kim YR and Kim HS: Diagnostic values of urine CYFRA21–1, NMP22, UBC, and FDP for the detection of bladder cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 414:93–100. 2012. | |
Morgan R, Bryan RT, Javed S, et al: Expression of Engrailed-2 (EN2) protein in bladder cancer and its potential utility as a urinary diagnostic biomarker. Eur J Cancer. Feb 21–2013.(Epub ahead of print). | |
Lei T, Zhao X, Jin S, Meng Q, Zhou H and Zhang M: Discovery of potential bladder cancer biomarkers by comparative urine proteomics and analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 11:56–62. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vrooman OP and Witjes JA: Urinary markers in bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 53:909–916. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vargová V, Pytliak M and Mechírová V: Matrix metalloproteinases. EXS. 103:1–33. 2012. | |
Paron I, Berchtold S, Vörös J, et al: Tenascin-C enhances pancreatic cancer cell growth and motility and affects cell adhesion through activation of the integrin pathway. PLoS One. 6:e216842011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xue Y, Li J, Latijnhouwers MA, et al: Expression of periglandular tenascin-C and basement membrane laminin in normal prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate carcinoma. Br J Urol. 81:844–851. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Katenkamp K, Berndt A, Hindermann W, et al: mRNA expression and protein distribution of the unspliced tenascin-C isoform in prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Pathol. 203:771–779. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Parekh K, Ramachandran S, Cooper J, Bigner D, Patterson A and Mohanakumar T: Tenascin-C, over expressed in lung cancer down regulates effector functions of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Lung Cancer. 47:17–29. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pauli C, Stieber P, Schmitt UM, Andratschke M, Hoffmann K and Wollenberg B: The significance of Tenascin-C serum level as tumor marker in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Anticancer Res. 22:3093–3097. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Booth C, Harnden P, Selby PJ and Southgate J: Towards defining roles and relationships for tenascin-C and TGFbeta-1 in the normal and neoplastic urinary bladder. J Pathol. 198:359–368. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berndt A, Anger K, Richter P, et al: Differential expression of tenascin-C splicing domains in urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 132:537–546. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Richter P, Tost M, Franz M, et al: B and C domain containing tenascin-C: urinary markers for invasiveness of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 135:1351–1358. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |