Analysis of blood flow and local expression of angiogenesis‑associated growth factors in infected wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 28, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.1997
- Pages: 1749-1754
Abstract
Introduction
Wound healing and the management of difficult-to-treat wounds have been the focus of traumatology departments, particularly the infected wound. It has been well recognized that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) accelerates wound healing. The NPWT device included a section of foam placed in the wound and covered with an occlusive dressing (1). The functions of NPWT include resolving infection, completing wound debridement, reducing the time required to produce a healthy granulation bed and increasing wound contraction (2). Although extensive research has been performed to investigate the mechanisms of action by which NPWT increases the rate of healing, and its probable beneficial effects in various basic and clinical circumstances, the molecular mechanism of NPWT has rarely been reported to interpret this phenomenon
A crucial link of how the NPWT system promotes wound healing mainly focuses on the increased blood supply. Angiogenesis is a complex process, which is controlled and regulated by angiopoietin and anti-angiogenesis factors. Various growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factors (acidic and basic FGFs) and angiopoietin are involved in neovascularization (3). The angiogenesis-associated growth factors that essentially contribute to the maturation, stabilization and remodeling of the vasculature were hypothesized to be differentially expressed following treatment with a NPWT system in an infected wound.
In order to detect the expression of these angiogenesis-associated growth factors, a protein biochip array technique was used, which was constructed on the surface of a biochip. A carrier component transports the biochips to different treatment stations within the analyzer, and following ligand binding, a chemiluminescent signal is produced, which is measured by a charge-coupled camera device and quantified by imaging software (4). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which a protein biochip array technology has been used to detect the molecular mechanism of the NPWT system.
Materials and methods
Patients
A total of 20 patients (13 males and 7 females) aged between 28 and 47 years (mean, 36.4) with a full-thickness infected wound, which could not be closed immediately at the Department of Orthopedics in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China), were include in this study. Patients consented to partaking in the study. The etiology of all wounds was trauma. All patients required initial debridement and necrotic soft tissue excisions. Spaced holes were drilled in the exposed bone and necrotic exposed tendons were excised. Following a proper debridement, patients were administered with a NPWT foam under a continuous pressure of −125 mmHg (all materials from VSD Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), no layer of protection was used between the foam and the wound. Various antibiotics, according to a drug sensitivity test, were used until the infection had been controlled. All wounds were finally covered following a number of VSD dressing renewals when a clean, red granulating wound bed was achieved. A full-thickness skin graft or a local transposition flap was selected as a final covering based on the situation of granulation tissue and exposed deep tissue. The study was approved by the local ethical committee (approval no. 2011059, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China).
Following primary debridement and on the third day during NPWT, a Laser Doppler Blood Perfusion imager (Perimed Ltd., Beijing, China) and PeriScan PIM 3 system (Perimed Ltd.) was used to scan the blood flow of each wound, and the PIMsoft software (version 1.5; (Perimed Ltd.) was used to analyze the blood flow on the scanned images. At the same time, a 3×5×5 mm granulation tissues sample in the centre of each wound was collected. Then all samples were maintained at −80°C until analyzed.
Proteomic analysis
Quantbody human angiogenesis antibody array 1 (RayBiotech Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) was used to assay the samples mentioned previously, 10 angiogenesis-associated growth factors, including angiogenin, angiotesin-2 (ANG-2), EGF, heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), leptin, bFGF, placenta growth factor (PIGF), VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) were detected in the current study. Samples of granulation tissues were treated consulting the specification of biochip array used. The protein array was performed following the user manual (version July 2010).
Statistical analysis
Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and were compared by analysis of variance. Values of each angiogenesis factor expression level and blood flows pre-primary debridement and three days later were compared. Data were analyzed with the SPSS 17.0 (SPSS. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Outcomes of wound repair
No complications were noted regarding NPWT. Following NPWT, all patients presented with a clean, red, granulating wound bed and successful reconstruction had been achieved by skin grafting (15 patients) or using local flaps (5 patients). The average wound healing time was 31 days (range, 21–44 days). The number of dressing changes was between 1 and 4, with an average of 1.8 times.
Wound blood flow
All wounds were scanned using the PeriScan PIM 3 system, and an image of each wound was captured (Fig. 1). A mean quantitative value of blood flow in the whole wound was calculated by PIMsoft software (Table I). A marked boost of blood flow was observed following NPWT, the mean blood flow prior to NPWT was 63.38±15.09; and on the third day this increased statistically to 297.13±54.67 during NPWT (P<0.001).
Protein biochip array analysis
The granulation tissue samples collected prior to and on the third day during NPWT, were observed to detect the changes in the expression level of the factors mentioned on the biochip array. Examples of the array are shown in Fig. 2. When angiogenesis factors were compared pre- and during NPWT therapy, an increase was observed in the protein levels of angiogenin, EGF, ANG-2, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), PDGF, VEGF and PIGF; however, significant variations only occurred in ANG-2 (P=0.001), EGF (P=0.000), PDGF (P=0.018) and VEGF (P=0.000). In addition, the levels of bFGF significantly decreased (P=0.007). The expression levels of HB-EGF and leptin were too low to measure the variation following NPWT (Fig. 3).
Discussion
A complex soft tissue defect wound is difficult to manage. Application of NPWT has been shown to exhibit a marked effect on promoting wound healing (5). Earlier in vivo studies of wound healing showed that NPWT improved removal of edema fluid and increased blood flow, granulation tissue formation and bacterial clearance in wounds (6,7). Lee et al (8) reported that NPWT application produces successful surgical reconstruction for large, deep skin and soft tissue defects without extensive radical flap surgery or loss of skin graft. In the current study, no complications were observed and high quality granulation tissue was achieved in each patient. Less local flaps were required during NPWT therapy, the wounds repaired using local flaps were one third of those that recieved skin grafting, and the success rate of the skin grafts were 100%, due to the several advantages, including stabilizing the skin graft and preventing the collection of fluid under the skin graft (9).
The current study suggests that the increase of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis may be a significant effect of NPWT. Increased blood supply enhances the migration of inflammatory cells in and around the wound. Previous studies focus on the effect of angiogenesis-related factors during vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. These factors act on endothelial cells within blood vessels around the injured tissue leading to the sprouting of new capillaries to perfuse the wound tissue. These capillaries function to mobilize a diverse collection of cell types into the peripheral blood and promote angiogenesis, either by directly incorporating into neovasculature or indirectly by serving as an additional source of angiogenic growth factors/cytokines. In addition, they have been show to exhibit direct effects on keratinocytes (10,11). Jacobs et al (12) used an in vivo application of the vacuum-assisted closure foam with negative pressure, which resulted in increased growth factor production, improved angiogenesis and collagen deposition. However, no previous study has used system to explore these cytokines following NPWT. The ability to detect a number of factors at once may have been problematic previously; however, protein chip detection has been broadly used in various fields (13) due to its advantages of high sensitivity, simultaneous detection of multiple protein expression levels, and ease of use. The use of a protein biochip array in the current study may provide a novel insight into molecular events, which may improve wound healing.
VEGF, a mitogenic factor, which acts on endothelial cells, is crucial in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis (14), and is regarded as one of the most important molecules involved in the process of angiogenesis (15). Labler et al (16) reported that the levels of VEGF in wound fluid were significantly higher in patients treated with NPWT compared with those treated with gauze. Our previous study showed an increase in VEGF levels using NPWT compared with a traditional gauze treatment (17). In addition, in this study significantly higher levels of VEGF were observed in the wound following NPWT.
ANG-2 is an angiogenic factor associated with maturation, stabilization and remodeling of vasculature (18), and promotion of endothelial cell survival (19). Shyu et al (20), observed a synergistic effect of angiopoietin and VEGF in promoting angiogenesis. This effect was implicated in the FOXC2-Ang2 signaling system, which is crucial for controlling vascular function (21). It has not been previously reported whether angiopoietin-2 levels alter following NPWT; however, in the current study, a significant increase was observed following NPWT.
PDGF is a co-factor that acts with VEGF to generate stable angiogenesis (22), and it has been reported to stimulate and enhance novel tissue formation in bone and soft tissue models (23). Combination of Ang-2 and PDGF may increase urokinase plasminogen-activator receptor expression (24), which is significant in the signaling pathways involved in wound healing. Shah et al (25) observed that the application of growth factors, such as PDGF, may aid in the healing of chronic, non-healing wounds. EGF is secreted by platelets, macrophages and fibroblasts, which act in a paracrine manner on keratinocytes (26). An in vitro study has shown that EGF was upregulated following acute injury, thus significantly accelerating reepithelialization (27). EGF and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) increase the tensile strength of the wound (28). PlGF, an angiogenic mediator promoting pathophysiological neovascularization, is expressed during cutaneous wound healing (29). The diabetic mouse model of Erba et al (30) indicated that the NPWT device was associated with a significant activation of the wound, expression of PDGF and EGF, superior granulation tissue formation rich in collagen I, as well as superior wound epithelialization. Shah et al (25) found that the application of growth factors, including PDGF may aid in the healing of chronic, non-healing wounds. In the current study, all three cytokines were expressed at elevated levels following NPWT, however the increase of PIGF was not identified to be statistically significant. A study period longer than three days may demonstrate a significant increase in PIGF due to its involvement in improving in wound closure by enhancing angiogesis (29). A similar trend was observed with angiogenin, a plasma protein with angiogenic and ribonucleolytic activity implicated in wound healing. Further studies are required to investigate the lack of significant difference in the present study.
HGF is a multifunctional cytokine that is capable of stimulating multiple intracellular signaling pathways to induce a marked variety of biological activities in a wide spectrum of cell types. HGF stimulates migration and proliferation of keratinocytes and has been suggested to be involved in wound healing (31). Chen et al (32) also observed that HGF exhibits a potential role in reepithelialization and cilium hyperplasia. However, in the current study HGF levels were not identified to be significantly different following NPWT, however it remained at a high level and exhibited a rising tendency.
Leptin is a recently identified cell factor, which promotes novel angiogenesis, and modulates inflammatory and immune function (33). Murad et al (34) reported that leptin is acutely upregulated in the injured skin, and proposed that this local production of leptin serves a critical functional role as an autocrine/paracrine regulator of normal wound healing. A burn wound rat model suggested that topical application of leptin promotes reepithelization to shorten the wound healing time (35). An animal study by Kim et al (36) indicated that HB-EGF is involved in the wound-healing process. HB-EGF may reduce the required frequency of EGF application since it may cause prolonged EGFR signaling when immobilized in the wound (37). To the best of our knowledge, the current study was the first to demonstrate the influence of NPWT on leptin and HB-EGF; however, the results showed a low expression level and the changes were not significant. This may indicate that NPWT has less influence on leptin and HB-EGF.
As a single polypeptide, bFGF is one of the 22 members of the FGF family and is produced by a variety of cell populations, mainly by activated macrophages and thrombocytes (38). bFGF is involved in a number of physiological and pathophysiological processes, including growth, wound and bone healing, cell differentiation and proliferation. Local administration of bFGF in skin flaps markedly increased tissue viability and accelerated the wound healing process (39). Jacobs et al (12) designed an animal model in which NPWT led to increased expression of VEGF and bFGF in the first 5 days. However, in the current study, bFGF was observed at low levels on the third day during NPWT. A clinical phenomenon may indicate that incipient granulation tissue under NPWT easily collapses if the negative pressure is removed. The granulation tissue may lack collagen, which is not generated without bFGF. It perhaps performs at a higher level in the later phase during NPWT, thus, the tendency of bFGF under NPWT is hypothesized to increased following initial decrease. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report this, thus, further studies are required to confirm this mechanism.
In addition, the angiogenesis-associated growth factors were not individually involved in angiogenesis, but interacted with and activated each other to promote angiogenesis. For example, in a study by Ko et al (40), VEGF enhanced neoangiogenesis, however, this was not effective on the maturation of organized reepithelization. The neoangiogenesis induced by EGF was not dominant, but did enhance the maturation of organized reepithelization. The key ability of bFGF is to induce angiogenesis via stimulation of VEGF expression (41). There are a number of studies of this, however these require further investigation. Investigation of the association and effects in disparate wounds and different phases may indicate whether angiogenesis modulation is involved in combined wound therapy.
The cause of these changes in the angiogenesis-associated growth factor levels and the underlying mechanisms were not mentioned in the current study. Quinn et al (42) showed that mechanical stretching regulates VEGF and bFGF gene expression in cultured pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells; however, the specific mechanisms remain unclear. The authors hypothesize that further research may provide an explanation. The factors detected in the current study are limited, as a number of other cytokines, including interleukin, TGF-β, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), GM-CSF, matrix metal proteinase 9 (MMP-9) are also involved in wound angiogenesis. Whether these cytokines are expressed differently under subatmospheric pressure also requires further investigation.
In conclusion, NPWT therapy can promote wound healing, and the mechanism may include: significantly increasing blood flows, and significant increases in VEGF, EGF, PDGF, ANG-2 and decreased bFGF after NPWT therapy. However, how these angiogenesis-associated growth factors act under subatmospheric pressure in wounds also requires further investigation.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by grants from the National Science Funds of China (project code, 81171713), and by the Doctoral candidate Independent research of Wuhan University (grant no. 2012303020203).
Reference
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Abu-Rumman P, Espensen EH, Vazquez JR, Nixon BP and Boulton AJ: Outcomes of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy on wounds of the diabetic foot. Ostomy Wound Manage. 48:64–68. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Argenta LC and Morykwas MJ: Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plas Surg. 38:563–577. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Murugesan S, Mousa SA, O’connor LJ, Lincoln DW II and Linhardt RJ: Carbon inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor- and fibroblast growth factor-promoted angiogenesis. FEBS Lett. 581:1157–1160. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fitzgerald SP, Lamont JV, McConnell RI and Benchikh el O: Development of a high-throughput automated analyzer using biochip array technology. Clin Chem. 51:1165–1176. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Laat EH, van den Boogaard MH, Spauwen PH, van Kuppevelt DH, van Goor H and Schoonhoven L: Faster wound healing with topical negative pressure therapy in difficult-to-heal wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Plast Surg. 67:626–631. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI and McGuirt W: Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 38:553–562. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mouës CM, Vos MC, van den Bemd GJ, Stijnen T and Hovius SE: Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Repair Regen. 12:11–17. 2004. | |
Lee DL, Ryu AY and Rhee SC: Negative pressure wound therapy: an adjuvant to surgical reconstruction of large or difficult skin and soft tissue defects. Int Wound J. 8:406–411. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hanasono MM and Skoracki RJ: Securing skin grafts to microvascular free flaps using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device. Ann Plast Surg. 58:573–576. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu L, Marti GP, Wei X, Zhang X, Zhang H, Liu YV, Nastai M, Semenza GL and Harmon JW: Age-dependent impairment of HIF-1alpha expression in diabetic mice: Correction with electroporation-facilitated gene therapy increases wound healing, angiogenesis, and circulating angiogenic cells. J Cell Physiol. 217:319–327. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wilgus TA, Matthies AM, Radek KA, Dovi JV, Burns AL, Shankar R and DiPietro LA: Novel function for vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 on epidermal keratinocytes. Am J Pathol. 167:1257–1266. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jacobs S, Simhaee DA, Marsano A, Fomovsky GM, Niedt G and Wu JK: Efficacy and mechanisms of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in promoting wound healing: a rodent model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 62:1331–1338. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Roesli C and Neri D: Methods for the identification of vascular markers in health and disease: from the bench to the clinic. J Proteomics. 11:2219–2229. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara N: Molecular and biological properties of vascular endothelial growth factor. J Mol Med (Berl). 77:527–543. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kadowaki I, Ichinohasama R, Harigae H, Ishizawa K, Okitsu Y, Kameoka J and Sasaki T: Accelerated lymphangiogenesis in malignant lymphoma: possible role of VEGF-A and VEGF-C. Br J Haematol. 130:869–877. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Labler L, Rancan M, Mica L, Härter L, Mihic-Probst D and Keel M: Vacuum-assisted closure therapy increases local interleukin-8 and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in traumatic wounds. J Trauma. 3:749–757. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou M, Yu A, Wu G, Xia C, Hu X and Qi B: Role of different negative pressure values in the process of infected wounds healing treated by vacuum-assisted closure: an experimental study. Int Wound J. 10:508–515. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, et al: Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science. 277:55–60. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Harfouche R and Hussain SN: Signaling and regulation of endothelial cell survival by angiopoietin-2. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 291:H1635–H1645. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shyu KG, Chang H and Isner JM: Synergistic effect of angiopietin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor on neoangiogenesis in hypercholesterolemic rabbit model with acute hindlimb ischemia. Life Sci. 73:563–579. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xue Y, Cao R, Nilsson D, et al: FOXC2 controls Ang-2 expression and modulates angiogenesis, vascular patterning, remodeling, and functions in adipose tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:10167–10172. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Heldin CH and Westermark B: Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol Rev. 79:1283–1316. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin Q, Wei G, Lin Z, Sugai JV, Lynch SE, Ma PX and Giannobile WV: Nanofibrous scaffolds incorporating PDGF-BB microspheres induce chemokine expression and tissue neogenesis in vivo. PLoS One. 3:e17292008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bezuidenhout L, Bracher M, Davison G, Zilla P and Davies N: Ang-2 and PDGF-BB cooperatively stimulate human peripheral blood monocyte fibrinolysis. J Leukoc Biol. 81:1496–1503. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shah JM, Omar E, Pai DR and Sood S: Cellular events and biomarkers of wound healing. Indian J Plast Surg. 45:220–228. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shiraha H, Glading A, Gupta K and Wells A: IP-10 inhibits epidermal growth factor-induced motility by decreasing epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated calpain activity. J Cell Biol. 146:243–254. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brown GL, Curtsinger L III, Brightwell JR, et al: Enhancement of epidermal regeneration by biosynthetic epidermal growth factor. J Exp Med. 163:1319–1324. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brown GL, Curtsinger LJ, White M, et al: Acceleration of tensile strength of incisions treated with EGF and TGF-beta. Ann Surg. 208:788–794. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cianfarani F, Zambruno G, Brogelli L, et al: Placenta growth factor in diabetic wound healing: altered expression and therapeutic potential. Am J Pathol. 169:1167–1182. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Erba P, Adini A, Demcheva M, Valeri CR and Orgill DP: Poly-N-acetyl glucosamine fibers are synergistic with vacuum-assisted closure in augmenting the healing response of diabetic mice. J Trauma. 71:S187–S193. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakamura T, Sakai K, Nakamura T and Matsumoto K: Hepatocyte growth factor twenty years on: Much more than a growth factor. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 26:188–202. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen M, Guan M, Li J, Wang H and Yang B: Effects of hepatocyte growth factor on wound healing of rabbit maxillary sinus mucosa. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 41:253–258. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Goldberg AC, Goldberg-Eliaschewitz F, Sogayar MC, Genre J and Rizzo LV: Leptin and the immune response: an active player or an innocent bystander? Ann NY Acad Sci. 1153:184–192. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Murad A, Nath AK, Cha ST, Demir E, Flores-Riveros J and Sierra-Honigmann MR: Leptin is an autocrine/paracrine regulator of wound healing. FASEB J. 17:1895–1897. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wen H, Wu G, Chen W, Yang H and Fu J: Topical application of leptin promotes burn wound healing in rats. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 32:703–706. 2012.(In Chinese). | |
Kim JM, Bak EJ, Chang JY, Kim ST, Park WS, Yoo YJ and Cha JH: Effects of HB-EGF and epiregulin on wound healing of gingival cells in vitro. Oral Dis. 17:785–793. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tolino MA, Block ER and Klarlund JK: Brief treatment with heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor, but not with EGF, is sufficient to accelerate epithelial wound healing. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1810:875–878. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Robson MC, Phillips LG, Lawrence WT, et al: The safety and effect of topically applied recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor on the healing of chronic pressure sores. Ann Surg. 216:401–406. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fayazzadeh E, Ahmadi SH, Rabbani S, Boroumand MA, Salavati A and Anvari MS: A comparative study of recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and erythropoietin (EPO) in prevention of skin flap ischemic necrosis in rats. Arch Iran Med. 15:553–556. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ko J, Jun H, Chung H, et al: Comparison of EGF with VEGF non-viral gene therapy for cutaneous wound healing of streptozotocin diabetic mice. Diabetes Metab J. 35:226–235. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hayward P, Hokanson J, Heggers J, Fiddes J, Klingbeil C, Goeger M and Robson M: Fibroblast growth factor reserves the bacterial retardation of wound contraction. Am J Surg. 163:288–293. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Quinn TP, Schlueter M, Soifer SJ and Gutierrez JA: Cyclic mechanical stretch induces VEGF and FGF-2 expression in pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 282:L897–L903. 2002.PubMed/NCBI |